Kerreb17 Archive

TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	[Houston, Texas] Tech school. I Dated my instructor for 4 months. Broke up last night. She said something to administration, I don't know what. I am now suspended and not allowed on campus while she keeps her job. Do I have a case? What kind of lawyer should I seek? I think that site is referring to Texas Penal Code, Title 5, Section 21.12. It applies to high schools (secondary schools) at the latest, so that theory might be shot. http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/PE/htm/PE.21.htm#21.12 It would definitely be worth getting an attorney to at least consult. I might have missed something, like an agency regulation or something like that.	/r/MensRights	25/04/17 04:25 AM
3	One of the main reason men are fucked up: fucked up female teachers in public schools "To motivate someone to excel, tell them they can't." Humans are curious creatures, huh? Makes you wonder how many people knowingly play the role of the heel so that others can find the greatness in themselves... Not saying that applies to this teacher, but it's food for thought.	/r/MensRights	13/01/17 01:35 AM
10	Absolutely pathetic, even by NY Mag standards: "Who Said It: Donald Trump or an MRA?" Mexican is a nationality, not a race.	/r/MensRights	21/05/16 05:58 PM
2	Dad who wants custody after mom marries convicted sex offender takes case to Supreme Court Just to clarify, the courts are technically not allowed to change laws (that's the role of Congress), but they are allowed to rule laws as unconstitutional and thus unenforceable. This can either invalidate the entire law ("invalid on its face") or make the law unenforceable in specific circumstances ("invalid as applied"). If no laws involved in the case are unconstitutional, then the courts have a duty to rule according to those laws. The courts can't change the law of the land per se, but fut…	/r/MensRights	06/04/16 04:12 PM
1	US EEOC Report: More than half of all allegations of sexual harassment are determined to be without reasonable cause Reasonable cause is a level of proof. A cause (suspicion) is considered "reasonable" when a person of normal intelligence, being presented with the available evidence, would consider the conclusion to be valid. To answer your question, cases of reasonable cause are not justified by the available evidence: a reasonable person would not come to the same conclusion. In this case, a reasonable person would not believe that ~50% of sexual harassment resolutions are justified (sufficiently backed up b…	/r/MensRights	20/02/16 08:04 PM

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter