TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KeyWeek Archive

View 0 posts and 113 comments by KeyWeek on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Because sex isn’t the only important thing
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/19 01:45 AM
1

Sex slavery was,and is, definitely a thing, but you example above has little relevance to OP’s hypothetical. The situation would have likely been one tribe destroying another by killing all its men, and taking all its women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/19 04:19 PM
1

One study in one region does not make it a fact. Even if we were to assume it is universally true, that does not mean it is anything like the OP’s hypothetical. It would most likely have been due to intertribal conflicts, where one tribe is fighting another for whatever reason
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/19 02:57 PM
1

If it’s not consensual then it’s not OK, but consent is between the two people engaging in the activity. There is some messed up stuff going on in that business, but in most situations it’s not possible to tell if the woman is being forced. In some cases it may be very obvious. The fact that some women are forced into this is a tragedy, and I definitely think the guy should educate himself about the industry, and make reasonable effort to know if it’s a coercion situation I think prostitution sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/19 02:44 PM
1

Buying a car is not an accomplishment.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 02:04 PM
1

Sure, but what’s your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 07:33 AM
2

This is incredibly flawed reasoning. Zuckerberg and Bezos and gates had women throwing themselves at them when they were single, and probably to some extent today, but it’s not the same as rock star groupies. It’s way more subtle, and it doesn’t happen In public venues the same way as the famous.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 05:03 AM
1

Being able to buy a car is an accomplishment. Buying it is simply a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 04:52 AM
2

I see nothing wrong with it. Fuck who you want as long as it’s consensual. I agree it can be a good learning opportunity In some cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 04:49 AM
5

True, but they might be hiding something different. Maybe a crime, maybe just something super embarrassing. In my opinion, there’s a middle ground where they don’t have to hand over their phone, but that the phone can be inspected in the presence of an attorney, and they attorneys job is to get to the truth of the matter, but can help the accuser keep not tape related info out of the hands of the police.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/19 01:42 PM
1

Hypergamyness is BS as TRP defines it: “The instinctual urge for women to seek out the best alpha available. This is marked by maximizing rejection (therefore women are the selective gender). A woman will vet her alpha through various shit tests ... this will enable her to jump to the next male with ease and little remorse.” And it is especially BS how the incel crowd interprets it, which seems to be that all women will immediately drop their current partner at the hint of an “alpha” male being …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/19 06:18 AM
5

Weak
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/19 05:57 AM
1

What’s worse, to be a criminal, or fuck a criminal?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 11:35 PM
1

I guess my whole point is that arguing that women should only marry in the early twenties and have kids in their early 20s because you think that's the only time they should have kids is pretty stupid and lacks nuance. (Not necessarily you specifically, just a general you and with everyone making this argument) Agreed. Also when you look at an increase of birth defects and cancer risks in regard to advanced paternal age older men aren't doing much better statistically. It all has to do with cell…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 04:02 AM
1

The reason birth defect risk increases with age is not because of decreased motility, it has to do with DNA damage as cells replicate. I understand perfectly well how DNA and mutation work. Risk is far more pronounced in women, even then it's going from a small risk to a slightly bigger, but still small risk. Many of the studies do not correct for maternal age, and the difference is generally small 1.5% risk of autism in general population And again, it's highly debatable about the affect on a f…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 03:48 AM
0

Not if she's a mother, because mothers tend to be paid less and are less likely to be hired than women who have no children due to the sexist expectation that she will quit and become a stay-at-home mom just because she gave birth. It's incredibly illegal but it doesn't stop people from doing it. Yes, that is true, and it is totally fucked up. My premise is based on the concept being proposed here where she is marrying a guy in early to mid 30s, and does not start immediately having children. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 07:07 PM
0

Highly debatable: https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/mutations-that-arise-in-aging-sperm-add-little-to-autism-risk/ Like most science reporting, it's mostly fear mongering to get views. Most of what I've read says there is a lowering of fertility rates in men as they age, due to lower sperm concentration and lower motility, but not much well supported science suggesting that it leads to higher levels of disability in the children that are conceived.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 06:57 PM
2

Just to be clear, I don't care if women in their 20s follow this advice, and while I think some of it is true, I think a lot is just conservative / religious BS. I'm debating more for the sake of debate. I also think womens SMV peaks in their late 20s to early 30s, but that could be me as I'm older and I like women that are mature and have their shit together. For women that really only have the physical qualities to offer, then yes, it's more in the early 20s. One premise of OP’s claim MUST BE …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 05:28 AM
1

Mid-50s does seem over the line. Way over the line. Why did he leave it so late? He's already got grown kids and wants to have more. His sperm won't be of the same quality as that of a younger man - that's even if he's able to get someone pregnant. True, but a bit overstated. There are plenty of men that age that have kids. And he'll be 75 or 80 by the time the kids reach 20. It's his preference not mine, I agree it's a bit old to be having kids. But it is doable. And knowing him, he will likely…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 04:48 AM
0

These days women can also have children and careers, plus husbands can now help with the children, plus 40s is nowhere near too old for a man to have kids. I’m an early 40s guy that plans to have more kids, and has a 5 year old now). I have a mid 50s friend who wants kids, neither he, nor I, expect the mother to be a homemaker. There are plenty like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 08:45 PM
2

A woman in her early to mid 20s would have gone to college and therefore doesn’t need to be a homemaker just because she married. She can have the same, if not better, career prospects after getting married.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 07:36 PM
1

False
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 07:33 PM
2

Compare how she is with you as compared to everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 02:04 AM
1

If you believe you are getting IOIs try not to talk yourself out of it, just act.most important to remember, do as I say, not as I do (I psyche myself out too 🤷‍♂️)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 02:01 AM
1

That was a good decision. I will be quite old if I ever have grandchildren 😞
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 01:02 AM
2

Don’t wait. Kids don’t care about your wealth, they just care that you spend time with Em and pay attention to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 01:01 AM
1

I had my son just after I turned 37. I wish I had started earlier, but I also want more children. At this age the desire for more kids, in part, has driven me to improve my physical condition, as it takes a lot physically to have kids. Age slows you down for sure, but I also see other fathers that are older that are doing just fine, although some of them seem like they can’t keep up with their kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 01:00 AM
1

Interesting, I’d love to see the source information.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 12:47 AM
2

do you think there is an abundance of men who can fulfill both of these needs (hot and secure)...? No, because the hot guy will be hit on by other women, this causing insecurity in the woman, even if he is totally loyal and would never stray. The fact that the woman knew she had security is probably why she was open... no risk for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 12:35 AM
1

She completed her judgment of him when he couldn't talk about his hobbies obviously the Bud Light remark was loaded when she recalled the story to me. I'm not talking about your friend at this point, as it's a second hand story with limited detail. I'm more responding to your staunch defense of the beer issue, and comments like "all bud light drinkers are dull and boring". If you had early on just been like "yeah, maybe the bud thing was a bit much, it's really all the other things that turned h…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 05:37 AM
1

I'm still not entirely clear who you are suggesting I am, but it I can assure you I'm no Fabio. I never had a girlfriend until college, then I had 1 while in college (but not the whole time). Was more or less involuntarily celibate during most of my 20s, with a couple relationships, then I got married and was monogamous the whole time. Now I'm getting divorced so I'm interested in the dating world again. I've had a couple casual experiences in my life many years ago, but I've multiple times gone…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 04:46 AM
1

What kind of guy am I? How did I not leave them alone? How did gamergate matter? I vaguely remember it, but never really knew the details. Oh, and I grew up before the internet was common, much less high speed, not sure how it’s relevant though
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 12:04 AM
1

You brought up "high value". Judging somebody on their alcohol preference the moment you meet them sounds pretty superficial. I know you believe that all bud light drinkers are dull and boring, but it's just not a fact. I've not seen any correlation between alcohol preference and internal character, EDIT: or personality. It wasn't the main dealbreaker Cool, but the way you presented it and the way you've been so strongly defending it makes it appear to be so but she was put off by a grown up bei…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 08:58 PM
0

Some strategies come out of the TRP philosophy, but ultimately the core is philosophy. For example: the concept of hypergamy is a philosophical attempt to understand why women behave that way. It on its own is not actionable, but can be used to try and come up with actionable strategies. There are some strategies mixed in with the core of TRP, but that really just mixing the game with the philosophy. Game doesn't care about the why, it's just a set of strategies that when skillfully applied, can…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 08:19 PM
-1

> the HARD PART is going from meeting to CLICKING to FUCKING, on a mans schedule in a way that suits the MAN That's what is about, game is about. TRP is a philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 08:00 PM
1

What is superficial about putting a smile on someone's face because you made them or recommended to them a tasty drink or food? When my husband and I serve our in laws (or friends) dinner it gets talked about for years after. ​ That's cool that you do that, I've thrown mean dinner parties too, but that's not what we are talking about, so not relevant to this conversation. ​ Explain to me all of these other non-superficial things you and other people in this thread do that makes that look like pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 07:50 PM
1

For sure!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 06:31 PM
2

In the immortal words of xzibit "tonight I just met my next ex-wife"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 05:21 PM
1

Your knowledge of basic drinks Oh I know way more than just the basics, but going too far into that is a major tangent. makes you more knowledgeable than many others which makes you more interesting and "valuable" in several ways I don't know where you got some weird morality angle here? I'm not talking morality, I'm talking value, perhaps I should have used "valuable" rather than "better". I'm talking about true value, not surface value of being able to conduct small talk on a variety of superf…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 05:15 PM
1

And yet there are plenty of people that are fascinating and interesting that also drink Bud. I love food and drink and know a lot about it. I know the difference between mezcal and tequila, bourbon and whiskey and can whip up a mean Negroni, I know the different types of bitters. I don't think that makes me better than somebody else. Some high value people are super into food, others are not, but they have other things they care about. The guy was a dud, it happens. I have no problem with your f…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 03:35 PM
1

I mean sure if they were to happen it would be a bummer, but it is also unlikely to happen. I have multiple friends who’ve gone through divorce and it doesn’t work out that way in reality. Payments like that are generally when the woman has no real skills and has full custody. Yes, sometimes the guy gets totally screwed over, but most of the time that’s not the case. My opinion is that worrying about getting into a situation like this is like deciding to become a criminal because sometimes peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 02:52 PM
1

but because the internet didn't exist back then I’m not that old 🤣. But yes, it was much smaller and these communities would have been much harder to find, and the RP philosophy didn’t yet exist. they where more forced to socialized and grow out of it. Definitely, and that is the crux of the problem. The internet is here to stay, and people can way more easily entirely isolate themselves from the real world and other viewpoints.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 06:12 AM
0

Yes, I generally agree, but it seems like it's much worse than it once was. Maybe it was always there, but they had no visibility before. I had a few friends that would meet the term, to greater or lesser degrees, today, although it was from way before the term existed. Overweight, nerdy, spending way too much time on videogames and porn. They were generally decent people, just sadly ignorant of how to talk to women, and generally socially awkward. They all eventually got their shit together to …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 05:14 AM
1

I’m not assuming anything. Coolcat is claiming women like getting abused by attractive men and implying that they only allow attractive men to abuse them. I’d like to see some supporting evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 03:55 AM
1

Tacky? maybe. A valid way to judge somebody’s character? Probably not. I think we are going to have to agree to disagree on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 03:00 AM
2

They get abused by ugly guys too. I'd be interested to see a study on attractiveness and willingness to suffer abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 02:48 AM
1

yes, I am making assumptions, just like everyone has to. That's how human interactions work Sure, everybody makes assumptions in life, but neither you, nor she, have to make this assumption. You could also not make any assumption in this case, life would have continued on just fine. You are then treating your assumption as fact and using it to justify your opinion. we don't live in his head Right, which is why you shouldn't assume you know what he's thinking or his intent. He may not have meant …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 02:39 AM
1

Sorry, asking if a woman wants a bud is not treating her like a bro, you are making assumptions about his intent. Like I said, maybe a minor faux pas, not a federal offense. I absolutely agree his game was weak and she should not have continued to go out with him, but the bud shit is ridiculous. Nobody is perfect, and sounds like she made her decision before any of his other failures even came up. This is like if he non-jokingly asked her if she wanted a meal off of the kids menu. No, asking her…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 02:18 AM
2

The issue is she expected him to know what she wanted and to make it happen. Fine to want the guy to know that, but to expect it is unreasonable. All the other stuff raised about the guy was valid, but the bud light thing says more about the woman that the guy. At worst he made a trivial faux pas with the bud thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 02:04 AM
2

If you understood that you wouldn't make that comment. Women in abusive relationships don't call the cops even when they get hit, until they finally get wise and realize they don't need to put up with that shit. ​ Women that call the cops when they didn't get hit are scum and I would argue they are in fact the abuser. The reality is that most of the time a woman calls the cops and says they got hit it is usually true. Just like when a woman says she got raped it is usually true. ​ There are some…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 02:01 AM
2

Nah, the replies were saying she was being shallow for judging the guy about liking bud light, and making a whole bunch of assumptions about that. The OP could have been like "OK, the bud light thing was kinda lame, but everything else was valid", but instead she dug in her heels on the bud light thing, which is completely ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 01:48 AM
3

I feel like actual ugly people might disagree with that...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 01:42 AM
2

That's not a small amount of weight, that's about 15-25% of what is considered the ideal weight for women between 5'2" and 5'10"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 01:28 AM
3

I didn't see much making excuses for the dude, a lot of saying one particular criteria the chick used to judge him was BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 01:23 AM
1

Sure courts aren’t perfect. Going to jail because you don’t follow court orders should be expected. I’m sure some of those orders are unreasonable, but like I said, shit ain’t perfect. I’d need to see more detail regarding licenses before I can comment. But my main point is living in fear of something that isn’t likely to happen, and is t that bad if it does happen, is not a good way to live.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 10:57 PM
5

Because how does that make them high value? There are tons of high value guys that don't drink. There are tons of high value guys that don't drink all kinds of different alcohol. There are tons of high value guys that wouldn't make a recommendation. There are tons of high value guys that would be happy to see that she's a down to earth woman that can go with the flow, even though she classes it up on the regular. The real questions is why do you think this is a metric of high value? Especially n…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 10:15 PM
5

I haven't seen her profile, but I can't imagine any dating profile where the man should know a woman doesn't want bud light, unless it explicitly says so. And I'm not blaming her for anything, I'm saying making judgments about a person based on just that is unreasonable and unsound, whether it be her or you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 10:04 PM
3

Well, what's unreasonable about that comment is you assuming you know what he is thinking, as well as assuming that any woman that drinks bud light is a "regular bar ho". The fact that he took her out on a date means he most likely does not agree with your assumption. You are just coming off as narcissistic and judgmental, making all kinds of unwarranted assumptions. I think bud light is piss, but I can conceive of the idea that somebody else could like it. She can want him to know that she want…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 09:52 PM
4

Please, Trump supporters are guys that drive through crowds and send mailbombs.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 09:18 PM
5

The point to me is your friend is making decisions on superficial trivialities. The fact that he likes bud light doesn’t mean he has no class, or is low class. Sure, she might have liked to have him ask, but to have it as wan expectation and write him off for that is ridiculous. If you had left that little tidbit out, I’d have been 100% on your side, but that part is just totally unreasonable, and the fact that you are defending it so hard reinforced my belief that that is what the overall decis…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 08:39 PM
1

No argument, just my opinion... but that's exactly my point: If you don't have assets to lose, why worry about financial impacts of divorce? If you've got enough to worry about, then you've got nothing to worry about, just get the most you can based on the law and your personal position. ​ I get that it's not quite that simple, but the concern about financial impacts of divorce are way overblown.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 08:02 PM
2

If she knows beer, then she probably likes beer. If she doesn't know wine, then assuming that the wine I pick is going to be something she will like is presumptuous, and probably wrong. Most alcohols are an acquired taste and often quite personal. It's also presumptuous to assume that she even wants it. What's wrong with her just making her own choices on something as simple and basic, but also personal, as food or drink? Especially on a first date when he doesn't know anything about her? If she…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 07:52 PM
5

I would never even think to offer to help a date choose her food or drink on a first date as it seems patronizing to me. I assume she knows what she wants and can read a menu. ​ Like I said on my other comment, the other issues this guy seems to have were valid reasons not to like him, but this is just a ridiculous expectation, bordering on childishness in my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 07:30 PM
1

My personal income is on the top 10% of household income in the US, my net worth is somewhere around top 25%, although it will depend how the home sale goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 07:24 PM
5

What help is expected here, to choose her own drink? That seems ridiculous to me, how is a man supposed to know what she wants on the first date, and why would he even think she can't choose her own drink?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 06:49 PM
2

That stuff about the bud light is ridiculous, even if just turned off. Maybe he likes bud light? That makes her (and you) look like you are judging on an extremely superficial basis. ​ The rest are legit reasons not to want to move forward, but the bud light comment makes me question the validity of the other criticisms. Sounds like she already made her decision based on that, and was looking for any reason not to like the guy. But if all the rest was true, then fine, don't date him any further.…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 06:46 PM
1

No; what makes me feel insecure is family courts that make me trapped in relationships by financial circumstances. As one good MGTOW youtuber said, the moment a man says "I DO" he enters a competition with divorced version of himself. And rules of this competition are changed randomly. This is something men worry about way too much. I'm going through a divorce, so I'm experiencing this very directly. I earned more throughout our relationship, and had successful investments. My ex had a good job …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 06:32 PM
1

As much as men bitch about being providers- they want that shit more than women do! Not really, that's just an assumption. And who's bitching about it? I work to support myself and those I care for. I help my parents out as they don't have much. I'm happy to do it for them, but I'd rather they had saved and planned better. Similarly I'm happy to do it for my partner if need be, but I don't have any need to be the provider. Look at their disdain for career women. Some disdain career women, most d…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 06:22 PM
2

That's a good clarification, I don't think many understand the difference and how important it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 06:10 PM
1

Wow, very well said. This pretty much sums up how I feel. I don't care about being the provider, but it kind of happens naturally.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 06:01 PM
1

Yeah, I guess my question should be more about effective approaches to helping them. I think the world would be better off, as well as the uncles, if we could find ways to help them. The lost causes are probably not worth the effort, but I feel like a lot of them just need better perspectives.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 05:21 PM
2

I suggest it’s a negative feedback loop. Maybe it starts as effect, but then the porn sets unrealistic expectations, which put the guy further away from getting it, then the normal porn becomes less interesting and they move on to kinkier stuff... rinse and repeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 05:19 PM
6

I think "need" is the wrong perspective, and it's going to be different for everybody. ​ I'm 44. For me it depends on what's going on internally and externally. Sometimes I want it multiple times in a day sometimes I can go a week without it, but that's pretty much the limit, and that's usually when something is wrong in the relationship. The idea of having a regular schedule, like X times per week sounds pretty miserable to me. Some guys will still want it multiple times every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 05:46 AM
3

Can the incels be helped? It seems like most of them are completely clueless and misguided about life. I know some of them are beyond help, but do any of them listen to advice? EDIT: I realize this is not a good question, of course some can be helped. A better question is how to best identify and help those that can be. Seems like a sad and lonely place to be stuck in, and the world is better off with fewer angry frustrated guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 05:38 AM
3

Do it as best you can, but do it. It's part of life, people's hearts get broken, it's just part of life. Way better to end it now than drag it out. ​ One note: ... there are so many things that I need to fix in my life before I could even ... ​ That's just an excuse. Everybody has so many things to fix in their lives. Always. Anybody who thinks otherwise is completely deluding themselves. Don't delay things because of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 04:41 AM
1

I'd say that goes both ways
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 04:16 AM
2

No, there's nothing inherently wrong with it. ​ Some people will judge you, but you can choose not to be bothered by that. It could be an indication of some sort of emotional or psychological disorder, or some other deficit, but that is not necessarily so.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 03:15 AM
3

How do people, day in and day out, labor under the delusion that it is actually possible to trust another human being? Now if one were to say "I accept that it could happen, and I'm ok with that", that's one thing. This is basically it... Although the "I'm ok with that" part doesn't have to mean you have to be OK with your partner cheating, but having the confidence to know that you will move on and have a good life if it happens. Also, trust is usually built over time, so you don't develop trus…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 03:09 AM
3

1-5 children are not biologically related to the father named on their birth certificate citation please
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 12:27 AM
1

Don't listen to people of the opposite gender's advice around dating. Go find people of your own gender that are of a similar level of attractiveness as you that are successful at dating and get their advice. ​ Generic advice to all genders: Be interesting and maximize your attractiveness toward your target type.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 12:18 AM
4

They aren't. You are just seeing the gay dudes you notice, which are of course the more attractive ones. And they are putting tons of effort into their appearance. You aren't noticing the fat ugly gay men, and on top of that there are a lot of gay men that look the same as straight men, and you therefore don't even know they are gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 12:14 AM
1

If the only men who get to see it are those that get to experience, all the more reason to avoid it, unless I'm misunderstanding your point. I've not lived that life, and while like I said the idea of doing it for a while sounds great, the idea of doing it for the rest of my life seems very unappealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 07:33 PM
1

Most of your other comments are pretty valid, but this is incorrect. Few of either gender want to think of themselves as burying and unappealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 06:35 AM
6

“But on the other side of the fence, the married men are looking at the man fucking hot babes and living the bachelors lifestyle with envy.” I’m sure this is true for some men, but is no way universal. A lot of men look at that and see it as fairly empty. It’s fun for a while, but a never ending string of casual relationships can become meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 05:07 AM
10

In my 40s, and people have not been denying looks ever matters in my experience. Both looks and personality matter, but they have inverse importance. A 10 physically can go a lot further with a week personality, than a 5. Looks are probably more important, especially at the beginning of an interaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 03:12 AM
1

Insults don't make your arguments any more vaild legions of men willing to give other men a hard time for it Some fool's video is hardly evidence of that statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 06:53 PM
1

Obviously you do care, or you would t bother to respond. pressuring to conform to masculinity is not the same as your original claim, and you’ve still failed to provide any valid evidence. Provide some or peace.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 06:40 PM
1

Red pill is a fairly specific theory about women, blue pill is a general rejection of that philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 01:19 AM
1

I can’t comment on your personal arguments, but your anecdotal experience is not the same as legions of men doing it, which was your claim. I’ve seen no evidence of this
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 01:09 AM
1

That’s just an assertion, I’m not seeing a bunch of guys saying it is men’s job to get single women coupled up. Where is this happening? Please provide supporting evidence. Since you are making the assertion it is your responsibility to support it. My experience is the opposite. Most guys I know think that if a woman is single and doesn’t want to be then it is her fault, basically her standards are higher than warranted, or she has some serious personality defect.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 07:18 PM
1

No man is out there giving other men a hard time about it. Nobody is saying “dammit guys, Charlize is single, somebody needs to step up and date her!” Most everybody is just rolling their eyes at this story, and a few idiots are thinking “I’d date her”
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 06:33 PM
1

I was wondering how long it would take that article to make it here. Because it sells ads?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 06:30 PM
1

LOL!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 06:26 PM
1

I've already explained why it's not comparable, which makes it a bad analogy. Feel free to explain what you are SPECIFICALLY comparing it to (hey, I can use ALL CAPS too!). If all you want to do is continue to say you are right without supporting it, feel free, but I'll move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 05:51 PM
1

In that last reply you didn't relate it to dating at all, are you now backing off from that? If you are not comparing it to dating / approaching women then the statements are true, but irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 05:22 PM
0

You are comparing aproaching people as a realtor at an open house is comparable to approaching women at a bar. As a former agent, and a man, I am quite familiar with both. Approaching people at an open house are not even cold, as they are basically telling you by going that they are interested in buying a house, and there is nobody else there who is competing with you for their attention, plus they are very likely to come talk to you even if you don't approach them, and you have an obvious topic…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 04:58 PM
0

I get the analogy, it’s just a bad one, for the reasons I stated. Cold approaching in the street can be easier than bar approaches. You just need to not be an idiot and have a minor opener.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 04:35 PM
1

The realtor analogy is terrible. I was also a realtor, and hosting an open house is nothing like a bar or club, as there is no competition. At an open house you are the only realtor there, except for the occasional agent looking with their client.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 06:25 AM
1

I assume you meant to say “same thing”, which it is not. Cheating is having sex or a relationship without your partner’s knowledge or agreement. Swinging is open and agreed to by both parties, so threfore not cheating
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 02:43 PM
1

I agree, which is why it’s better to divorce than stay together in a high conflict marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 02:41 PM
0

Swinging is not cheating, and literally is not what you seam to think it means. Im not a swinger, or in an open relationship, but I understand the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 02:04 AM
1

There are many women that are non-monogamous
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 01:25 AM
1

From your linked citation: “For studies based on populations chosen for reasons other than disputed paternity (table 1) median PD is 3.7% (IQR = 2.0%–9.6%). While this is not a measure of population prevalence it does suggest the widely used (but unsubstantiated) figure of 10% PD21 may be an overestimate for most populations.” So not only does your link not support your claim, it is saying that the claim of 10% of children being not of the stated father is dramatically overestimated.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 01:08 AM
1

Yeah you did. You chose the only part of the study that reinforced your belief, and then misrepresented it in you statement. 30% of children are not illegitimate, 30% are when the father is so convinced that they call for a paternity test, which also means they are still wrong 70% of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 12:46 AM
1

Somewhat better vs far better is just semantics, still better. I agree that having parents that get along is better than splitting up, but that says more about having loving caregivers, rather than marriage or divorce. The parents could be divorced, but live together as roommates.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 12:41 AM
2

It’s unfortunate that your boyfriend was so affected, but that is an anecdotal story. Here are some links that support my position: https://www.york.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/2017/research/rowing-harmful/ “The damage caused to a child’s development during a family breakdown is done before the parents separate, a study suggests.” https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/nov/22/children-divorce-resolution-survey-rather-parents-separate https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/shift-mind/20150…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 12:35 AM
1

Staying together when the people can’t stand each other is way worse for the kids
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 11:27 PM
8

Most studies conclude the opposite, divorce has little impact on children, it is how the parents treat each other that causes harm. Divorce is far superior than parents who stay in a marriage but despise each other
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 04:17 PM
1

Ok, read some of it. You picked the highest range, which was reported in the case of disputed paternity, and ignored the median of 3.7%, which is most likely the actual rate when looking at the general population. You also ignored the bottom range.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 04:03 PM
2

The one line answer: that number is global, but dating is hyper local. In more depth: the 50/50 number is based on the total human population, but the available pool of potential partners is a minute fraction of the global population. At the top level it is dramatically reduced by age and location selection. But there are dozens, possibly hundreds of other factors that reduce the available partners. Some of these factors can result in a wildly different ratio than the global average. For example…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 03:48 AM
1

Most hardcore gamers start quite young, often before dating really happens, and they therefore fail to develop the necessary social or physical skills to be of any interest to girls and women. Then due to their lack of viable partners they spend even more time on video games and porn, it becomes a vicious downward spiral
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 02:49 AM
1

Citation please
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 01:11 AM
2

I suggest you ask him. It sounds like you suspect he is, but suspicion is not a great foundation for a relationship. There are 3 primary possibilities, he cheated, and he will tell you the truth, he didn't cheat and he'll tell you the truth, or he did cheat, but he'll lie. ​ If he did cheat and he owns up to it, there is promise, but he will also have to have learned something from it, what it was that triggered him to cheat, and why he wouldn't want to do it again. But at least in that scenario…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 03:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter