TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KeyboardChemistry Archive

View 0 posts and 40 comments by KeyboardChemistry on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Hey man, If you are wondering whether or not you should be a better person, the answer is that you should be a better person. If you, as an individual, with a lifetime of experiences and beliefs, think that kicking your gaming habit might make you a better person-- then a lot of observation and thought have gone into forming that opinion without you even realizing it. You may even have already decided, in which case, you're using this post to hold off a bit longer. =)
/r/seduction16/03/12 03:59 PM
3

Through the lens of psychological types, this seems to only illustrate somewhat obvious differences between Thinking types and Feeling types. Approx. 60% of males are thinkers, and 60% of females are feelers. As a male feeler, I related far more to the communication expectations for women.
/r/seduction06/03/12 12:04 AM
9

It sounds kinda obvious that you just aren't reading these girls correctly. They're obviously into you, and they're being open and honest with you when they say stuff like that-- so when you hurt their feelings by using unecessary seduction moves-- they withdraw, as anyone does when their feelings are hurt. Just because you have a tool doesn't mean you always need to use it.
/r/seduction01/03/12 04:11 PM
4

I don't think he spoiled anything that wasn't already explicitly made available to you in the first quarter of the book. You might be overthinking it.
/r/seduction17/12/11 09:23 PM
2

I think this means familiar as in "fucking overcasual". Like not caring how you look, picking your nose, farting, making a mess, binge eating candy in secret, etc, etc. I think there are exceptions to this rule, of course. If someone derives pleasure from reading Twilight or jacking off to Gay porn despite being straight, that is totally cool. Just make sure its something you feel all right with internally. I know for me that if I spend a day or two where I do nothing but get high and play video…
/r/seduction07/12/11 03:26 PM
11

I actually think this was a brilliant. As an Atheist, I'm all right with Christians in general. But I don't think I could ever handle a Christian who can't handle their religion being mocked a wee bit. This approach filters out girls that lack a sense of humor or take their religion too seriously.
/r/seduction06/12/11 11:41 AM
2

http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes1.htm After you get your type, it gives you a bunch of pretty good links for learning more. To be honest: I'm a huge evangelist for MBTI. I think it is the best that modern science has done to examine the various personalities, motivations, potential weaknesses and strengths of many different people. It is least useful for people who score very low on each of the types, since that will place you sort of "between" types, with neither being very accurate. …
/r/seduction17/11/11 04:45 PM
-1

Just because I'm super curious OP, what is your MBTI personality type?
/r/seduction17/11/11 04:29 PM
2

I don't feel that what you said is disempowering-- I feel that is an example of "mean world syndrome". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_world_syndrome Sure, some guys have gotten fucked over by the system, and we should totally be concerned about them and do our best to ensure that kind of thing doesn't happen. But to let that stuff consume you to the point where you have to bring it up in the midst of a light-hearted conversation about approaching women? No, you're not going to fucking getting…
/r/seduction13/10/11 03:38 AM
7

Go back to MRA where you belong. Better yet, find something useful to help vent dissatisfaction with your life.
/r/seduction13/10/11 03:14 AM
4

I think its more of a philosophical issue than a practical one. While it might seem to the useful and intelligent posters of this community that basically they're being mistreated because half of the posts are garbage-- they have to be aware of the invisible, silent audience who is respectfully absorbing the wisdom.
/r/seduction12/10/11 11:19 PM
4

I think the problem is this: A vast, vast majority of people read the sidebar, looked at other posts, and practiced in the field. And a vocal minority posted lots of stupid shit. You have to always be conscious that 90% of the community isn't posting or asking questions-- they're just reading what others are saying.
/r/seduction12/10/11 11:01 PM
0

You should really refer to MFA as much more help can be provided there. Black Sketchers are a massive no. Hideous, hideous, hideous. Especially as a bigger guy, you should be wearing some nice boots. A nice pair of quality shoes can make any guy-- any guy-- look a thousand times better.
/r/seduction10/09/11 08:06 PM
12

When people did this it creeped me the fuck out. Please don't do this.
/r/seduction09/09/11 01:09 AM
2

I actually think you're right, but that you have genders reversed. You're underestimating the effects of Testosterone. Too lazy to cite sources, but it appears that testosterone tends to make us the gender more readily governed by our chemicals. In terms of evolutionary psychology, it makes perfect sense. We need to be impulsive, daring risk-takers in order to produce as many children as possible and survive. Women need to be more consistent so that they can keep their offspring alive. The reaso…
/r/seduction05/09/11 03:44 AM
5

On the sidebar of a different sub-reddit, which is fucking retarded. They really need to just put it there.
/r/seduction04/09/11 04:14 PM
1

You just suck. I don't feel a greater explanation is needed since your post makes it so self-evident. Edit: The fact that this douche is being upvoted and I'm being downvotes shows what a disconnect sedditors have from reality. Do any of you hope to get married one day? There's some massive cognitive dissonance going on if you think striving to make women happy in long term relationships is a futile endeavor.
/r/seduction21/08/11 05:10 PM
1

I dated one. She is now an atheist whore and I love her. =)
/r/seduction10/07/11 04:38 PM
2

Looking for a debate. Belief without evidence is the opposite of science. If you want to worship sky faeries, feel free, but you lose the right to be friends with science.
/r/seduction10/07/11 04:37 PM
30

Thank you for being a light in the darkness. Jesus fucking christ.
/r/seduction14/06/11 03:21 AM
8

This just isn't true. Lots of people go there and ask questions on how to look like James Bond. If you say "Hey I'm $20 and want to dress well but casual and cheap" you will be helped.
/r/seduction11/05/11 04:53 PM
7

In what will definitely be the minority opinion: I definitely think afungi was right and that eliminating some of the more obvious misogyny would make this sub-reddit seem more respectable. But the masses have spoken. Perhaps merely awareness will help.
/r/seduction30/04/11 06:26 PM
3

I think this guy is right, and that lots of the other posters here are valuing "the game" over the goal. If you can make her and yourself happier by doing things a different way, go for it.
/r/seduction28/04/11 02:28 AM
2

I definitely agree that there is a difference. However, there is not a working scientific definition of honor, from which I could challenge the assertion that women are less capable of understanding honor than men. Therefore, I turned to the psychological understanding of morality to assert that women are just as able as men.
/r/seduction12/04/11 11:08 PM
1

Most sane people agree =/ Just gonna wait for society to catch up with us.
/r/seduction12/04/11 09:23 PM
1

This is true. If your insurance wont cover it definitely just go with Adderall. Fuck universal healthcare not being the status quo yet.
/r/seduction12/04/11 09:12 PM
3

I would personally recommend Vyvanse. It's basically chemically very similar to Adderal, but they tweaked it a bit and removed some of a specific type of amphetamine. As a result, you feel more yourself and less like you're on a drug... but with all the performance enhancing effects. You forget you're on it until you realize how effectively you've been using your time compared to if you didn't take it. With Adderal I felt like I could focus on ants making an ant hill or watch paint drying, with …
/r/seduction12/04/11 09:01 PM
1

If you really want to do this like a boss get ADHD meds-- or speed. Conversations have never been easier or more fun. :P Obviously I don't actually recommend this unless you have ADHD.
/r/seduction12/04/11 08:48 PM
1

Define honor. My so-called "Strawman" is the exact same thing as if I had said "women are no worse at honor than men", I used used a term with some scientific meaning via psychology rather than a word one can fill with just about any meaning they want. E.g: Honor-killing. Whatever. r/seduction can be a big circle-jerk of Misogyny.
/r/seduction12/04/11 08:21 PM
1

Morality is the closest thing to honor that exists in an objective sense. If you can provide something that isn't wishy-washy that can take the place of honor for the sake of this argument, feel free to. But there isn't. So yes, I do treat them as synonyms. For obvious reasons, there have been no psych studies on whether or not women have "honor" on the same level as men; so "morality" stands in. And yes I went off-topic, with the intention of illustrating the horrors of letting your world-view …
/r/seduction12/04/11 08:06 PM
-6

Too stupid to be worth conversing with then. Edit: I read and comprehended what he was saying and provided a counter-argument which he was incapable of understanding. And I already continue this argument in various places throughout this thread so there wasn't much else to add. To be a coward is to go along with the ridiculous misogyny going on in this thread that this sub-reddit is condoning.
/r/seduction12/04/11 05:24 PM
8

No, because this is idiotic. Honor is an abstract-- the closest thing to an objective sense of honor we have in a psychological sense is a measurement of one's moral reasoning ability. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kohlberg%27s_stages_of_moral_development Women aren't any fucking worse at morals than men are. Your pseudo-darwinist bullshit terrifies me, because it shows me what the conservatives are going to sound like in 60 years once they drop the religious bullshit from their arguments and har…
/r/seduction12/04/11 04:56 PM
7

This is a fair interpretation. A better way perhaps would be to say "Don't ever compromise your honor just because someone else doesn't understand." However, I think lots of people here on Reddit are interpreting it as saying that women can't understand honor because it is something exclusive to males.
/r/seduction12/04/11 04:52 PM
3

That is mostly a result of social-constructs, not wiring. Sexual competition between women is much more fierce because of economic inequality, and because men are STILL the pursuer. Once women become aggressive as pursuers, men will feel much more conscious of the fact that we are always in the midst of sexual competition with eachother-- something that we can blissfully ignore at the moment because of how much privilege being male still offers.
/r/seduction12/04/11 04:47 PM
5

The seduction community is VERY good at understand the biological and psychological differences between men and women-- why can't you apply all that knowledge to this situation? High value men are simply rare as fuck. It's understandable, in a way that doesn't make them worse people are or any less capable of honor, that women are often more cut-throat. Your bro breaks up with an attractive, awesome girl-- you don't feel the need to pursue her because attractive, awesome women are a dime a dozen…
/r/seduction12/04/11 04:45 PM
40

"Honor is a Christian abstraction, don't expect Jews to understand." Works just as well for Atheists. "Honor is an American abstraction, don't expect those Iraqis to understand." But its all right to say about women, am I right? Edit: Since each reply has pretty much said the same thing I'll respond here. You're telling me that 51% of the world is incapable of understanding the concept of honor and expecting this to be a defensible notion? And telling me that I AM the one who doesn't understand?…
/r/seduction12/04/11 03:51 PM
34

The misogyny is strong in this one!
/r/seduction12/04/11 02:47 PM
5

Thing you would find interesting: Post-modernism, anti-foundationalism, social-constructivism, etc etc etc. Seriously interesting shit that basically agrees with you.
/r/seduction11/04/11 01:13 AM
1

I'm in a similar boat. Lots of bitterness about parents I'm now learning have always been mentally ill and the various problems that caused for me growing up (including a sense of poverty). It has shaped my personality in a lot of ways, and in the end I managed to take what I had and craft a uniquely excellent and successful person, but not without lots of small problems that I'm learning to work through. I'm constantly amazed by how much better (and by extension, attractive) of a person I can b…
/r/seduction07/04/11 10:58 PM
1

This might be a bit too generic to be useful, but my opinion: You need to be able to turn the charm on sometimes, even if its in a "fake it til you make it" kind of way. In an awkward situation, the person cracking a great joke to diffuse the situation and make everyone else feel comfortable-- they feel awkward too, its how they know its time to act. But your actual personality can be exactly as you are and your story, and I mean this non-sarcastically, is very sympathetic. You're not driven bec…
/r/seduction07/04/11 10:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter