TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Khaemwaset Archive

View 1 post and 31 comments by Khaemwaset on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
115

Khaemwaset/r/MensRights28/04/13 04:14 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

5
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:44 PM
1

That actually describes my point well.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 08:27 PM
1

Scared people do a lot of retarded shit, trust me.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 07:24 PM
1

Why are you putting words in my mouth? Think clearly, instead of feeling your way through situations. What if she just got out of an extremely traumatizing and abusive situation and against her better judgement, she needed to walk to get something at night? I didn't say her reaction was appropriate, it can simply often be more than her being a bitch. People react to stress differently.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 06:29 PM
1

Not a pass. It's just not a big deal.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 04:13 PM
1

I wasn't justifying it at all. I was saying her reaction may have been based on more than what the OP thought it was.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 04:13 PM
2

I'm saying stop perceiving experiences from your limited emotional response alone, and consider alternate contributors to the direction an interaction takes. It's not always about you.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 03:26 PM
3

Possibly. It's not like she did anything illegal. She was reacting to conditions based on her own internal experience, just as the OP was uncharacteristically asking for a smoke based on his own internal experience.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 03:08 PM
9

You also don't know her state of mind, and how the rest of her day had been. You're summing her up as a person based on a 10 second interaction. Maybe she was scared. Maybe she had a shit day. Maybe it wasn't about you.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:12 PM
1

They're not invalid because you declare them to be, and it ultimately doesn't matter how you concern yourself with someone else's points.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 01:19 PM
0

I saw her a few months ago at the airport in Cabo, Mexico. She certainly doesn't need to lose any.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 05:23 PM
0

No.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 02:36 PM
0

I don't know if I'd call a mixed team "hockey". :) Bashing a puck around, sure.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 04:33 AM
2

Because men don't go into women's dressing rooms to conduct interviews.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 04:30 AM
1

His stance on enforcers is 100% accurate. His stance on visors is ONLY relevant to enforcers, or those who fight. If you're going to be fighting, don't hide behind a visor. that's his position.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 08:37 PM
1

Not competitive then. I played both, and got in more fights playing lacrosse than hockey, and we took our helmets off to fight.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 07:52 PM
1

You never played, did you?
/r/MensRights28/04/13 07:33 PM
1

As someone who played very competitively, his stance on enforces and visors is spot on.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 07:10 PM
1

I don't think he's ever been wrong about anything lol.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 06:26 PM
9

Perhaps then it shouldn't be part of the job. Cherry is rarely wrong, actually, but then again I've played the sport.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 04:16 PM
0

Transphobic is a word now? Give me a fucking break.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:10 PM
14

That's what I'm seeing as well. They aren't actually protesting anything, they seem to be roleplaying the role of an activist. Really all it is, is self-indulgent back patting.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 04:15 PM
21

Yeah, but I still don't understand what they're actually protesting.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 04:00 PM
11

WTF. What are they protesting?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 03:21 PM
8

Reads like it was written by a 5 year old.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 12:42 PM
1

Second dude on the right looks pretty average. Big deal.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:06 PM
13

To be honest, I never read instructions.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 03:34 PM
-2

It is sad when I feel like I can read through Colbert and Jon Stewart's comedy to learn the news better than I can read through the News Media's bullshit. Meaning you feel you can learn the news "better" (how articulate) through their comedic offerings on events than through other media outlets. This is due to your own biases, which they likely developed FOR you. If you don't get this, forget it, you're a moron.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 03:54 PM
5

I don't think you understand what "honest" means if you're using it to describe someone with an admitted bias.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 03:42 PM
0

LOL, sorry, did you think you wrote something of substance there? You feel like you can get a better understanding of the world through Colbert and Stewart rather than other media outlets because they simply re-enforce your already established opinion (which they probably developed for you).
/r/MensRights24/04/12 03:40 PM
14

That's only because you happen to agree with Colbert and Stewart's political ideologies.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 12:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter