TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Khufu2589 Archive

View 0 posts and 210 comments by Khufu2589 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

The system is set-up to move the Overton window in a way to make women look disavantaged even when they're not. Feminist studies is specialized in producing manipulated statistics that falsify our perception. And then policies designed to correct this "injustice" in fact implement priviledges for women and discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 01:49 PM
9

And why do you keep repeating your debunked argument like it would make it more credible? You sound blinded by your ideology and unable to see anything else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/21 02:17 AM
6

They could even reform further and ban circumcision altogether.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 08:36 PM
7

They've been groomed by the system. They probably dont even realize how they act. They just apply what they've learn, and apply the feminists policies coming from education academic, teachers unions and feminists politicians.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 05:32 PM
1

Or birthing people. lol!
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/21 03:58 PM
15

Or it could be that men believe feminist propaganda about women's moral superiority.
/r/BlackPillScience13/06/21 09:28 PM
2

It's on the poster.
/r/AntiFeminists28/03/21 12:07 AM
29

Refusing to submit to the demands of radical activists is not transphobic.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 02:23 AM
27

It's time for society to evolve past the Bronze age and to stop molesting male babies for absolutely no valid reasons.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 07:15 PM
5

JC dude, you need to diversify your sources.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/21 03:44 AM
6

You cannot judge something as unbiaised if you have only one source. He brush aside any conflicting information, a.k.a. he cherry pick what he is presenting his audience. Mass media does that all the time due to ideological conformity and time constraint.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 04:18 PM
-1

Why not? Edit: I'm serious. The article uses the word 'male' to designate men plenty of time, but you it's only when the word 'female' is used Why's that?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 04:10 AM
6

I think, based on my experience and observations, that men are also less finacially supported by their own familly once they reach the college/university level. Ive never found any reasearch on this, but when I was at uni, men were exhausted from working long hours and attending classes, while women tended to perform due to their ability to concentrate on their studies.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 08:38 PM
1

And what would be the league of a man that isn't tall and handsome?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 06:41 AM
0

Not to mention that sometimes, some women will reject men by expressing disgust and acting repulsed.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 04:56 AM
1

What powers? What the hell are you even talking about? It might sound based in gender studies classes, but it is absolutely not related to the real world. It's dehumanizing and erase any issues men can have.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 04:51 AM
6

Your post touches several issues. The education system has been proved to systematically disavantaged boys, right from the start, leading to an education gap at the higher levels. Secondly, when radical activists push for policies aimed at correcting a perceived biais that doesnt exist based on manipulated statistics, i.e. the feminist modus operandi, you create new injustices or exacerbate those that already exist. This is an all out war against white men, at every levels.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 02:03 PM
14

If the wage gap and the glass ceiling are keeping women down, why are they complaining about men having a lower status?
/r/MensRights23/12/20 05:04 PM
30

Affirmative action is not equality, it's discrimination.
/r/MensRights23/12/20 04:58 PM
4

My alarm bell started to ring when I saw that Netflix sci-fy time travel movie showing that is was a good thing to execute people for wrong think. I cannot find it anymore but that was troubling.
/r/MensRights23/12/20 01:52 AM
2

It's the 'women are wonderful' effect.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 11:49 PM
2

I have mo medical training. How does this contradict what he said?
/r/MensRights06/12/20 04:06 AM
2

Please enlighten us.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 11:26 PM
3

Apparently there's a verg questionable study saying that circumcision reduce the risk of STD transmission.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 07:59 PM
7

That theory might be the result of Islamic countries pushing for it.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 07:39 PM
1

Where is this about?
/r/MensRights26/11/20 03:36 PM
3

Except that this is an output of Cultural marxism, which has the ultimate objective of destroying "Patriarchy" and "White Supremacy", which are synonymous of Western civilization and capitalism.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 01:37 AM
3

No, we'll be nothing more than serfs at this point.
/r/AntiFeminists22/11/20 06:28 PM
8

What they're doing is implementing measures aimed at reducing men net wealth by preventing their employment and them from accessing the capitals necessary to open their own business, beccause banks now also have their own diversity quotas.
/r/AntiFeminists22/11/20 04:08 PM
1

Yes, it seems.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 01:56 AM
3

Anh attemps to adapt these laws to reality is met with a wall of angry feminists. There's a reason why they look the way they are, and this reason is feminism, altough I agree that sometimes obselete views on society can also come at play,but it's quite minor in comparison imo.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 10:39 PM
7

That objectively false. Our current family laws are the results of decades of feminist activism and pressure. Our politicians are fucking cowards.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 09:35 PM
2

I would take everything coming from APA with a grain of salt. They drank the woke Kool Aid and sometimes sound like raging SJWs. Altough the crime rate of men is obviously higher, you should take into consideration that these statistics are skewed because men are overwhelmingly more likely to be arrested, prosecuted and condemned for the same crime.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 09:10 PM
1

That's interesting and would need to be further developped. Do you have any sources talking about this. I think sub-culture is definitively an issue, and metroplitan vs smaller town culture would likely make a difference.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 09:01 PM
1

Culture, dont forget culture.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 08:57 PM
5

The Left shamelessly distorts statistcs when it suits them. First, they make sure to penalize fathers throught gynocentric laws, and then use the outcome as a justification to even more penalize them and implement priviledges for women.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 08:53 PM
10

Why would mothers be the more important parent?
/r/MensRights20/11/20 08:51 PM
6

You go back at them by saying that there's more blacks incarcerated because of their higher crime rating, and then you grab the popcorn.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 08:49 PM
3

It's the outcome of indoctrination. No logic, no rationality, only feelings and ideological rethoric.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 08:45 PM
1

Most of Europe is. North America, Australia and NZ as well.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 09:08 PM
1

Do you know something I dont?
/r/MensRights17/11/20 07:59 PM
5

And where are you gonna go? Wokeness is generalized in the Western world.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 01:40 PM
3

What a disgusting abomination!
/r/MensRights17/11/20 01:38 PM
1

Rgis is one ofthe feminist endstates. Sorry, but with the woke wave it wont get better.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 09:21 PM
1

It's useful for them to forment victimhood. It's part of their indoctrination process.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 10:53 PM
6

They can also avoid anything invented or built by men for that matter, including food.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 10:36 PM
15

Leave and dont look back.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 07:55 PM
115

But she's craving to be a victim. A whole hierarchy and belief system is built around it.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 04:07 PM
2

Critical race theory, radical feminism and gender theory in their academic format really sounds like the vile stuff nazis and other were spielling end of 19th and beginning of 20th. You're not wrong.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 10:05 PM
2

Radical feminism dates back at least from the early 60s
/r/MensRights10/10/20 10:01 PM
3

They probably fantasize that they qould end up with an army of subservient Chad.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 09:58 PM
1

Classic liberal feminists maybe, but I'm definitively on the same side than he neo-marxists ones, a.k.a. mainstream feminism.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 09:50 PM
1

Cultural marxists always have been adept of the tshe Cult of Victimhood. They'll use either it or empowerment according to circumstances, and often both at the same time if necessary.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 09:45 PM
1

They consider real equality to be a de facto right wing boogeyman.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 06:46 PM
1

Wokeness in a nutshell. If they say something offensive and that we are offended, it's because we are offensive. This is totalitarism.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 07:03 PM
3

Dying for a society that considerer us to be second class citizens? No fucking way. Open the gates and let the barbarian hords in. It's the fall of the Western civilization and the beginning of a new dark age era.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 01:22 PM
3

Unfortunately the lawyer who did this was killed this month. How convenient for certain people.
/r/MensRights12/08/20 08:05 PM
1

FGM is a tradition as well. Hundred of boys die in the US every year because of complications, and countless more are horribly mutilated. The same issue with girls would cause an universal uproar. It's definitively barbaric.
/r/AntiFeminists10/08/20 02:45 PM
6

Mainstream feminism has sadly proven to be midrandrist in numerous instances, as well as completely intellectualy dishonnest.
/r/AntiFeminists10/08/20 02:28 PM
34

She's pushing for genocide. It's as extreme as it gets, but alas not a new thing. The SCUM manifesto was published in the 60's and it still considered as one of the important document of radical feminism. They're still teaching it universities.
/r/AntiFeminists10/08/20 02:26 PM
13

Because it's Male Genital Mutilation, and it's barbaric.
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/20 10:46 PM
7

If they can open and close a fucking door they can deal with a toilet seat.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 12:24 PM
7

"Bring it on" would be more effective.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 09:13 PM
11

But the feminists have created the very thing they swore to destroy Animal farm.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 12:04 AM
16

Is it not in the US where healt organisations dedicated to women is well over 3000, while it's a handful for men?
/r/MensRights01/08/20 01:09 PM
4

'Trans baby' lol! Lunatics.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/20 04:14 PM
2

I agree with you. All citizens should be allowed to have a say on subjects impacting society, including conscription and abortion. To divide the population into subgroups, each with tailored freedom and legal accountability, is a tactic used by cultural marxists to destroy the social fabrics of Western nations. This is a tactic used by the ennemy, and we should fight it by adhering to classic liberals values.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 04:15 PM
2

Well you're consistent, something that's too much absent from today's polarized discourse, particularly on the left. My upvote to you, sir.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 09:44 PM
1

Could you explain to me how the military industrial complex dispropotionaly affects black American?
/r/MensRights06/07/20 09:42 PM
1

It might be a different one.
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/20 07:50 PM
28

There you go. Personnal insults out of nowhere, the thrue mark of a sjw. Not to mention your frail argumentation.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 01:21 AM
28

How are they oppressed?
/r/MensRights06/07/20 01:13 AM
3

"How can she slap?"
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/20 05:51 PM
25

All these little things, when added together, contribute to creating a misandrist society.
/r/MensRights21/06/20 03:56 AM
2

In Montreal they virtually banned tazers: too dangerous because they had a small rate of lethality. So now the cops have to rely on their guns, and on their guns only, unless they call for the sector's tazer to be brought to their location.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 09:23 PM
1

There are instances where unarmed people can be a dangerous threat.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 09:19 PM
1

Ok could we stop pretending that this non binary thing is not totally insane.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 02:24 AM
3

This is another example that the end state feminism is aiming for is not equality, but supremacy. You've got to look at the whole picture. In Quebec, there's also such a law that warrants public agencies' boards to have AT LEAST 50% of women. All of them, except one, has a female majority. But yet, this exception is presented as problematic by the feminist groups, the gouvernement and the medias.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 02:15 AM
3

New rules, that will stop criminals.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 01:39 AM
0

I was talking about the Canadian law referenced in the article. Civilians have to go throught edicated training, vetting and security measures to be able to own weapons. So they're probably the last ones you should be worried about.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 08:15 PM
2

The vast majority of murders are comitted with illegal weapons. 'Assault style rifle' means scary looking gun. And even then, in their last wave of bannings they included a lots of bolt-action rifles.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 07:13 PM
3

That's the new Globalist way my friend.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 07:05 PM
3

Killers in Canada dont use legal guns, as in this case here, so yeah the current restrictions are designed to punish lawful citizens for ideological reasons, while leaving the criminals alone.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 07:03 PM
1

13 women and 9 men, but I guess the article rouded it up to 100% women.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 07:00 PM
0

Linking the Orlando shooting to misogyny is intellectually dishonest and clealy intended to white wash it to fit the current narrative. Same goes with the weapon ban laws. The shooter, like the vast majority of killers, used illegal weapons, and ther is simply no logical justification for the ban.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 06:59 PM
3

Dont under estimate the institutional creep. This loud minority is drafting the policies that are governing our society.
/r/AntiFeminists06/05/20 12:24 AM
4

Some women.
/r/AntiFeminists05/05/20 10:56 PM
10

Doesn't matter. People like her still have way too much influence. She would probably be one of the leaders of WHO if she would be alive today.
/r/AntiFeminists05/05/20 03:15 PM
30

Nothing, and they will blame men when it starts to crumble.
/r/AntiFeminists05/05/20 03:12 PM
1

Wait! How come Trudeau's picture is not in there?
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/20 05:41 AM
0

Of course they wont admit it. They're probrably not even self-aware.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 01:25 PM
-1

From what I've seen, it's not so much the rate of domestic abuse as much as the severity. Most of victims, men and women, dont need to go to a shelters. But some perpretators, generaly men, are so violent and perseverent in their persecution that the shelters have to be anonymous locations, otherwise the life of its occupiers would be in danger.
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/20 01:36 AM
3

It would be in direct contradiction with their ideology.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 03:00 PM
5

Got to feel opressed, otherwise the whole purpose of the victimhood culture by which they identify themselves would cease to exist.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 02:59 PM
3

Absolutly not. It's recurring all over the world, in universities, governement agencies, etc. Once they reach equality, they change the definition of the word, or create new ones, like the abhorrent 'equity'. We're sliding into totalitarism, one step at the time. The diversity ideology is as bigoted and supremacists as those they like to denounce throught their usual list of *ist and *phobes.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 02:57 PM
1

It's 'chauvinistic female pigs', in feminist language. These females should really ChECk THEir PriVIledGeS.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 02:50 PM
10

This is probably the only parts that really happened. Everything else is an ideological preparation for the declaration of faith at the end.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 12:19 AM
1

International organizations are prone to ideological biais and shouldn't be blindly trusted.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:44 PM
-4

I agree with you on this; this bill needs to have strict control measures with accountability, but no identity politics.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 12:40 AM
5

I agree with that up to a certain point. There's cases where couple have to makes decisions to favor a career over the other one, like when your're having children for example. If you divorce, then the person who made the sacrifice ends up being disavantaged.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 09:08 PM
15

The storyline and the special effects are actually good, but the over sensitivity of Burnham, and of other characters, is annoying as hell and left you wondering how such a chaotic organization can manage to explore anything.
/r/AntiFeminists16/03/20 08:15 PM
3

Classic example of double-think right on top with the " women are the main victims of war" thing.
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/20 07:26 PM
4

Well, as a matter of basic decency I will still care about murdered women.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 12:57 AM
3

I dont think they have it planned up that far. Once things start collapsing around them, they'll still find a way to blema patriarchy.
/r/AntiFeminists09/03/20 11:08 PM
7

Shouldn't she be reported to authorities before she kill her husband, in case she's serious?
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/20 05:09 AM
20

That 'equality' was renamed 'equity' by the left, which basically means that everybody is equal, but some( the protected groups) are more equal than others(hetero white men). It's rebranded bigotery, nothing more.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 11:27 PM
2

I think I'm confused. Is your previous posting sarcastic or not.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 01:23 AM
2

So when they're leaving out gays or black, what are they?
/r/MensRights03/03/20 12:46 AM
1

Because Diversity = no white man.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 12:45 AM
3

You're talking about gender cultural norms, not genders. There's only two of those, and they're based on sex. Altough the Gender theory stating that there's an infinite numbers of genders is indeed socially constructed.
/r/AntiFeminists29/02/20 02:23 PM
13

It's gonna be funny and pertinent as long as the gender theory bs is still pushed.
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/20 04:52 PM
1

Culture of outrage in action.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 05:45 PM
1

If this is what makes you happy.
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/20 10:59 PM
1

Please provide us with your insight.
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/20 08:51 PM
1

Why do you think so?
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/20 08:50 PM
26

For feminists, it means "activist for domestic abuse awareness against women". It's doctrinally implied.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 10:13 PM
5

Women can’t punch, they can only hit? Weird. That's the newspeak the sjws are trying to impose on the rest of society. Control the language, control thoughts.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 10:09 PM
5

Well feel free to go on subs hating on men and whites. They're is plenty of them to keep you busy. Cuck and white knight are not incel terms. You dont get to link terms that describe reality to unpopular movements, even though there absolutly pertinents, just to discredit any criticism and the originator of the comment. It is not for nothing that feminist are trying to erase the term and concept misandry from our collective use and memory; they dont want it to be used againat them to describe th…
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/20 04:35 PM
4

And what's incel about this sub exactly?
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/20 03:15 PM
9

"The man should make more money to compensate for..." Then they're gonna bitch about the wage gap. They will always use every mental gymnastic to demonize men.
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/20 04:01 PM
3

I'm still being downvoted lol.
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/20 03:05 PM
-2

"It's not women, it's womxn you Nazi!" Edit: /s
/r/AntiFeminists10/01/20 09:30 PM
4

The 'at least' can be found in the majority of 'equity' laws. It's generalized institutional misandry.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 12:01 AM
44

But wait, I thought the dictionary defined feminism as promoting fair and equal treatment between the sexes? They're promoting 'equity' now, not equality. They make up rules as they go, so that they can keep going with as little resistance as possible, one step at the time.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 08:39 PM
1

Must be satire. It doesn't have the usual terminology used by SJW. Too much direct to the point.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/19 04:18 PM
1

You voted for Corbyn, and Jess Philips?
/r/MensRights24/12/19 04:14 PM
8

Apparently, "respect the space" is the SJW code word for sexist segregation.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/19 04:33 AM
10

For cultural marxists, educated is synonymous with ideological orthodoxy. They change the meaning of the words to control the population's thoughts. Exactly like Orwell describe in 1984.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/19 10:51 PM
21

I cant manage to grasp the delusionnal universe these people perceive to live in.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/19 10:27 PM
1

Did they get rid of these cultural marxist? That would be a great news. #Resistance
/r/MensRights17/12/19 09:22 PM
1

Isn't the Upper Canada Law Society the organisation that forces it's members, i.e. all lawyers in Ontario, to sign a Diversity Engagment form for them to not be disbarred? Do you belive that this SJW cabale will be sympathetic to men being discriminated?
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:33 AM
18

Oh God! That vile witch also writes in the newspapers. Hope she will go down with Corbyn. And I'm not even British.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/19 02:55 AM
6

And there should be a workplace death card dor men only as well.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:21 AM
5

You're supporting classic liberal feminism, which is similar to MRA, sadly today's mainstream feminism has been hijacked by marxist radicals, and can be described as a hate supremacist movement.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 04:41 AM
29

So are women, but you're probably too indoctrinated to realise it.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 04:38 AM
1

It's still mental illness. She would be better off receiving mental health support to heal her than to engulf in her own delusions.
/r/AntiFeminists02/12/19 03:20 AM
20

Either they need men or they dont.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 02:00 AM
5

Stop oppressing objects!
/r/MensRights27/11/19 04:20 PM
3

This is where SJWs jump in and explain to you that this is in fact 'equity', that it is beautiful, and that you should never, NEVER question it, otherwise you're an incel Nawhdzi.
/r/AntiFeminists23/11/19 02:41 PM
3

I have absolutly no thrust in any system insane enough to torture children. Who knows, maybe it was a 'woke' jury.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 03:29 PM
3

Why would anyone listen and trust an insane woman that says that her 3yo children is in fact a trans female? If it's a credibility contest the dude wins overwhelmingly.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 02:18 PM
4

So what? It's not a judgement of his caracther. She's a SJW nutjob who's willing to sacrifice her son's mental health to show her wokeness. That's child abuse clear and simple. And if you use your own favorite search engine, you'll find out that she's pushing this same exact agenda on her young patients (she's a doctor of somekind).
/r/MensRights17/11/19 04:19 AM
7

"Excuse me Baltimore Museum of Art, I have a Michelangelo that's been in my family for centuries that I would like to donate. Say what? Ah too bad he was a men then. Better luck next time."
/r/MensRights17/11/19 03:17 AM
6

I wonder how they plan to rectify the centuries of imbalance in warfare and work related deaths. What a fucking cancer.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 03:12 AM
2

Please enlighten us. Every one knows that mainstream medias are bastions of thruth.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 02:50 AM
9

Totally unrelated, the Seattle Times logo looks like a Waffen SS Division symbol.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 05:09 PM
1

The new Stars Wars pushed their identity polity down our throat, not to mention that they dont respect the legacy of the first trilogy. But they have good special effects.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 05:01 PM
2

Is she not the one who raise her boy as a girl?
/r/MensRights15/11/19 04:51 PM
3

"Candidates will have to proved to be worthy of our Glorious Party and show total and complete adherence to the Party lines and dogmas"
/r/MensRights13/11/19 12:22 AM
2

"...to create a life, to feel it grow inside you" Women are responsible of 100% of abortions, so I guess they can create death on a mass scale as well.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 03:36 AM
7

'Intellectual'?
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/19 08:18 PM
20

Nowadays we see entitlement rage.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 09:49 PM
5

Maybe it's because they want to take over and lady-like men are easier to subjugate, if they're not already willingly subservients.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 12:08 AM
2

Which one?
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:25 PM
1

"Lame, all lame! - SJWs
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:24 PM
3

Is there a group called UN Men?
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:19 PM
12

Bang on!
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:16 PM
13

That's the whole point dude. It's a matter of having the 'good' crowd.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:16 PM
1

That's because they think that everything bad stem from the Patriarchy and toxic masculinity, and everything good from feminism.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:12 PM
7

I like how you mentionned Parental Rights. It just happens that every attempt to improve the issue is systematically opposed by feminists. Now, how should we act on this?
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:07 PM
5

I'm sure we gonna get a truthful, logical and realistic description of the feminist movement by the feminists themselves. LMAO
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:04 PM
13

Why dont you just consult feminist academic papers and feminist academics, politicians, legalists, and any mainstream feminist organisations? There's plenty of insane ideas over there. Moderate feminists that actually believe in true equality, i.e. equality of opportunity, as per the brochure definition of feminism and which is similar to the men rights movement btw, are systematically shuned and canceled by the proto-maoist pink guards for heresy. Like it or not, radical misandrist marxists hav…
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:02 PM
1

Wait until you get more experience and you will see for yourself. For a lot of the women, height is not a preference, it's a requirement. There's nothing comparable for men. Short men dont get laid because they get rejected, tall women dont get laid as often as they would like to because they reject others. As for the 'oppression' thing; a significant minority of women wont hesitate to express their conptempt of short men in a way that would trigger a UN campaign if the same would be done agains…
/r/MensRights03/11/19 01:48 AM
1

My best girlfriend is 4ft 11in so I have no problem with small people - she's actually married to a man who is 6ft 3in! They're oblivious! The memes write themselves.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 01:38 AM
5

Dont hesitate to make a comment on the youtube page.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 01:32 AM
1

Tell Putin about it. He'll take off his shirt and deal with the problem.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 01:20 AM
14

Repeatedly break the freaking glass when nobody is watching, preferably from the balls' room. At some point they'll get the message.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 01:17 AM
1

A culture gets to decide if there are 0, 2, 3 or possibly more genders By that are you referring to SJWs that unilateraly decided to make up a bunch of absurd genders with assorted pronoms. Now that's a social construct!
/r/AntiFeminists30/10/19 12:57 PM
1

Good. We agree; gender = sex. So there's only two.
/r/AntiFeminists30/10/19 02:37 AM
0

Let's start with a mental health program that make them accept reality. If someone thinks he something else than what he really is, he has a mental issue. "is to treat them as their preferred gender and to call them by the pronouns they are most comfortable with" No fucking way I'm gonna call a furry 'xir'. "Either that or you find a practical and easy way to change what hormones a human body produces." Fun fact; trans take hormones specifically because their body is not producing it, or in the …
/r/AntiFeminists30/10/19 02:35 AM
1

*she
/r/MensRights28/10/19 01:34 AM
1

No it's not. It goes againt the post-modernist ideology though. But I agree 100% with you.
/r/AntiFeminists26/10/19 04:52 PM
1

Please explain to us the difference between gender and sex.
/r/AntiFeminists26/10/19 12:13 AM
1

There's legal precedence where gender theory is treated as science and pushed on society. Look at that bat shit crazy pediatrician in Texas the unilateraly decided that her 3 y.o. son was a girl, despite the legal objections of the father.
/r/AntiFeminists26/10/19 12:13 AM
1

Gender "expectations" are a social construct, not genders. Men in society X might like to wear skirts, but not in society Y. But they're still men. There's only two genders.
/r/AntiFeminists26/10/19 12:09 AM
1

And this is exactly why they should get mental health support instead of indulging their delusions by acknowledging their made up genders and pronoms.
/r/AntiFeminists26/10/19 12:06 AM
2

Wow! Are you saying that genders are not a social construction but biological instead? That changes everything.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/19 10:16 PM
2

but I think male achievement in general would be proportionally smaller if boys today had not had male role models throughout history Is this why cultural marxists are taken down the pictures of historical deens from the faculty walls? By erasing history, they can rewrite it as they wish
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/19 10:13 PM
2

Why are 'they' not trying to get more men interested in all the other fields since they are the minority in most of them, instead of having gynocentric programs in place.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/19 10:08 PM
2

I dont know. Maybe you're not fanatical enough for their liking. But you might not be a suprenacist either.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/19 10:05 PM
1

That's bs and you know it. Gerder-based discrimination is only accepted, and even celebrated, if it's done against men.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/19 09:46 PM
1

I tought math was made by men, for men. It seems that feminists were wrong after all.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/19 09:28 PM
2

are better at this stuff than men statistically speaking So can we use the same argument to favor men in the domains where it applies? Tyou sound like a female supremacist and a discrimination apologist.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/19 09:27 PM
3

You can used your mental gymnastic as much as you want, but if organizations start selecting male employes based on their gender for any reasons, like you do for women, it would be branded as mysogynistic and sexist, and it would cause an outrage and probably banned right away.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/19 09:22 PM
2

If they're selection employees based on their gender (male or female), then it's sexist discrimination.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/19 09:17 PM
15

Let's encouraged our boys to become doctors now.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/19 09:08 PM
1

Ad hominem my friend, Ad hominem.
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/19 10:56 PM
1

When you need to find a reason to feel opressed.
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/19 03:55 PM
2

Maybe this is what you think in your circle, but they really dont.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 05:00 AM
1

Or a cuck.
/r/AntiFeminists11/10/19 07:20 PM
2

/r/askreddit also have at least one retard as mod.
/r/AntiFeminists11/10/19 07:01 PM
1

Or they could redo the painting to make the subjects POC or women. They could even have a black muslim trans woman in there. But it's not erasing the past, it's just modernizing it.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 09:08 PM
1

The hell is she saying? I cannot even make sense of anything she has written.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 02:45 AM
2

What!? Not a all. Google it, you'll see for yourself.
/r/ExRedPill28/06/19 05:27 PM
3

SOME women are hypergamous. You're generalizing big time. Real men are not white knights, because white knights only defends women, even if they're wrong. Real men defend everybody when it's right, as per basic decency. See the "How can she slap" video for a good example.
/r/ExRedPill28/06/19 04:35 PM
2

The hypergamy, "Chad" and "Beta" thing is real, however grossly over exagerrated. This is what makes the RedPill so effective; it's rooted in reality, but a partial one. This is the basis of all grievance ideologies; cherry pick what supports the narrative, and ignore the rest.
/r/ExRedPill28/06/19 04:19 PM
1

Just went on the link; I cant believe these idiots have any kind of legitimacy. They're clearly far left and totally biased.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/19 03:23 PM
2

The Regressive Left use the Diversity excuse to alienate white men from their own society forever, because oppressor cannot oppress if they are a minority with no political or economical powers. They openly state is as one of their objective. Hence the diversity push in the private sector and mass migration campaigns. Diversity means no white men.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 02:55 AM
2

What's you definition of whiteness?
/r/MensRights22/12/18 02:43 AM
1

And do yo really think whites (Europeans) did not get hurt through centuries by other population. Your cherry picking your fact so that they fir your ideology.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 02:43 AM
1

Then again, lots of speculation here, not to mention the ad hominem. I'm sure you wouldn't go around going around insulting the tall chick, would you? Yes, short me are dismissed by some woman based on height alone. Yes, some are even insulted and berated. Agree that self-improvement should be everybody's goal. Your belligerent attitude is a perfect example. ​
/r/MensRights22/12/18 01:15 AM
1

Once again, these are not my groups.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 10:55 PM
1

I condemn any incitation to rape, violence or oppression. It doesn't mean the everything that is said is wrong. The problem with feminists misandric statements and actions is that they are widely accepted in academic circles, media and even political and legal institutions. Then again, the intent here is not to demonize an entire gender(look at the feminists to see what it would really look like), it's to criticise woman who have a double standard and that are often very rude about that specific…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 06:53 PM
2

"By my opinion your opinions are vastly more toxic and divisive. Should I go through /r/mensrights to find examples? How about /r/redpill how about the various incel subs." Your assumption is wrong: these are not my opinions. I'm not saying that I agree or disagree with them, but I am not a contributor on these subs. Even if I would be a contributor, I would probably disagree with a lot of that I would be reading(like everywhere else), which would itself only be a limited portion of the publishe…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 06:38 PM
2

"then you should understand you can be criticized too. " Agreed, as long as it done in a respectful way and is rooted in rationality. "Sorry if you're so sensitive that you think your hate for something can't be criticized," Why would somebody hate a toxic radical ideology that is governed by emotions and lacks any intellectual integrity, not to mention the overwhelming stench of misandry that comes from it? "even when the way you're doing it is objectively pathetic." See 1st sentence.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 04:13 PM
3

Feminism will be criticized as long as it deserve to be. And men can vent about impossible beauty standards imposed on them if they want to; it doesn't say anything about their personality and Reddit is the perfect media to do it. You're the whiny bitch here.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 03:09 AM
2

Because decent and mature people care about not hurting other people.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 03:00 AM
1

Popular culture cause anorexia, and other problems too, including for men, if you care.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 02:59 AM
1

To clarify, I am not criticizing Judaism or any other religions; I am pointing out that we should practice it with judgement and put the Holy Books into their historical context.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 04:10 AM
7

Stoning adulterers is also in the Bible.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 04:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter