TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kickmekicku Archive

View 0 posts and 146 comments by Kickmekicku on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

What’s going on here??? I don’t get it
/r/MensRights22/11/18 07:06 PM
1

Yes you did. You compared a child hitting someone stronger then them to a woman doing the same.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 12:32 AM
9

Did you just say women are like children?
/r/MensRights21/11/18 09:03 PM
5

She's just a friend you want to see more of, think of it like that. Hanging around in the same places she does doesn't make you a stalker. Going there and not saying anything to her may seem a little strange tho.
/r/seduction22/10/18 07:20 PM
4

oof... Should've gone and sat with her dude.
/r/seduction22/10/18 07:13 PM
18

Unethical how?
/r/seduction22/10/18 02:31 AM
3

Cunt?
/r/MensRights30/09/18 09:45 PM
0

My insults have nothing to do w/ my political views. I'm just grasping for straws tbh. If anything I'm trying to give you an out for being so pig headed.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 08:32 PM
0

"Women don't die in wars" Ok
/r/MensRights03/09/18 04:47 PM
0

LMAO! To be so blinded by hate that you can't admit women were once second class citizens. You were allowed to beat your wife, women could only speak when spoken to, not allowed to hold public office, not to mention, oh yeah, VOTE! https://www.sss.gov/About/Return-to-the-Draft/Postponements-Deferments-Exemptions A quick list of reasons you may be exempt from the draft. You are obviously still allowed to vote if you are a minister, which is one of the exemptions on there.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 04:13 PM
0

Striving to have the same rights as your contemporaries IS equality. There are millions of people, men included, who are not required to sign up for the draft but are allowed to vote. These are the facts. This "emotional" puddle I have apparently dissolved into is an outburst of frustration at the idea that this subreddit is becoming more about hating women then it is about helping men. You cannot rewrite history, women were for thousands of years treated as second class citizens. No matter how …
/r/MensRights03/09/18 04:03 PM
1

Who asked you I mean.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 03:55 PM
1

Who asked?
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:12 AM
0

Lol, you’re insane dude. You’re “argument” is a moving goal post. As soon as I shut down your inane rambling that women shouldn’t vote cuz they don’t serve in the military, you say then only community service should be rewarded w/ voting rights. Which women do serve the community, so now they have to be net tax payers, which many are. You have no leg to stand on, so you shifted your argument and then looked for a reason to bail. You’re ignorant and a coward.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:11 AM
1

He literally didn’t know what the first wave of feminism was about, how is it my job to play the historian? Suffrage by the way.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 11:04 PM
-3

Community service which of course women do. So they should be allowed to vote, so shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 07:22 PM
-9

So physically incapable men should also not be allowed to vote because they’d be turned away by the military? You’re a fool
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:57 PM
-16

Oh, you've been in combat? If you haven't I am sure you will wait until you cut your teeth on the battlefield before voting.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:32 PM
-4

Their main goal was suffrage, how is that supremacy?
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:26 PM
-1

I'm not going to explain basic US history to you. If you want to be less ignorant, do your own research.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:25 PM
2

Weeeelll, no. First wave feminists really were for equality.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:41 PM
3

Oh wow “some”! Well your movement is forgiven! Hey guys! Third wave feminism is A-OK, some of them don’t condone rape!
/r/MensRights24/08/18 03:39 AM
3

Perfect
/r/MensRights22/08/18 06:19 PM
3

sexual penetration (by a foreign object) of an unconscious woman ... Mhm, yeah that's rape.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 03:02 AM
2

Get on it OP
/r/MensRights03/08/18 02:50 AM
30

THEN YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM!!! /s
/r/MensRights17/07/18 03:12 AM
57

The maids don’t have to either. They choose to.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:12 PM
6

Men are superior in some ways. You’d have to be in pure denial to deny men have superior bodily strength The genders are equal. But pretending like they are identical is stupid.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:20 AM
3

Let's be honest, all women are really oppressed by their own biology. This is what I was responding to. I was pointing out that means biologically superior strength does not mean women are inherently disadvantaged.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 09:26 PM
-16

Did you bother to read my comment? Or the one I was responding too?
/r/MensRights13/06/18 08:50 PM
-34

Being marginally weaker is being oppressed? They can carry children, produce food for them. Have higher pain tolerances. Women are biologically superior to men in a lot of ways.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 08:34 PM
1

Gettin laud is easy, proper grammar is hardest.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:39 AM
-2

No, but you are an asshole for going onto a fetish subreddit and shitting on someone’s fetish
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:28 AM
1

every weekend for the last 5 years
/r/MensRights14/05/18 03:54 AM
1

Condescension and bombast. Eat a cock.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 02:30 AM
1

The rest of your post was ingratiating nonesense. Read as: I didn’t bother reading Typical narcissist bullshit, responds to a comment he didn’t read. Not only are you a dumbass, but you’re a lazy dumbass
/r/MensRights13/05/18 06:41 PM
6

The large majority of women are actually rather boring and witty/ funny women are incredibly rare. Wrong. Perhaps there are less professional female comedians because they do not pursue the arts as fervently as some men. But the women I know are equally as comedically crafty as the men I know, and I know FAR more hopelessly unfunny men then I do women. Once you get past the unrelenting lure of sexual promise that that females undoubtedly project and you ejaculate Of course the only appeal of wom…
/r/MensRights13/05/18 05:18 AM
35

You seriously sound like a bitter virgin. Women are not evil Women are people Shut the fuck up
/r/MensRights12/05/18 08:28 PM
23

The UK has such a fucked up legal system
/r/MensRights11/05/18 07:02 PM
5

I still wouldn't care.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:37 AM
2

Your fucking cunt
/r/MensRights06/05/18 12:05 AM
-2

You would rather surrender every year of your life from here on out, dressing, feeding and making well, someone who could never return the affection or the gratitude; than die? If you would, you are better than most people. But I strongly suspect you wouldn't, same as I, or anyone else would not.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 08:11 AM
0

r/incels would luuuuuv your company. Taking care of someone for the rest of your life is arguably more difficult than surrendering your life to protect someone. While it is selfish of her to leave him, there are very few people among us who could do what she has been doing the last 3 years, let alone indefinitely.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 09:42 PM
4

He gave up his life so that she could have one. If he did this just so she could care for him selflessly and live a miserable shitty life, what was the point of his sacrifice?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 09:22 PM
1

Yeah honest to god, let’s get over it.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 01:42 AM
2

not typically like this subreddit to downvote for this kinda stuff....
/r/MensRights19/01/18 12:20 AM
6

In reality, the mugger did something nobel. By stealing his condoms the white male was rendered sexually inert, and therefore not a risk to women.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 10:25 PM
3

The silent majority I would wager
/r/MensRights18/01/18 10:24 PM
3

I was with you til that last paragraph...
/r/MensRights04/01/18 12:08 AM
150

Well I’ll be damned, how incredibly polite of them!
/r/MensRights21/11/17 03:18 AM
19

I think the point of the post was to point out that there are holes in feminist logic. They saying that what women find attractive is based of the influence of the patriarchy and what not, is blatantly not true. As this post points out.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 02:24 AM
12

Wake up dude. You are in a very amiable subreddit and getting downvoted. You are way over the line, and if you can’t see that then there is no point in us talking. Also, I have had this account for 6-7 years, I am by no means a troll, which of course you would know if you paid any attention.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 02:21 AM
16

Well your last 2 comments make you an ultra-defensive autist, so I guess we're even. EDIT: And if we are going to talk about racism, you just DIRECTLY said that white people own modern medicine and that black people don't deserve it because of 1 stupid scene in a comic book.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 11:15 PM
12

Holy shit. Yikes dude.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 11:10 PM
32

Oooookkaaaayyy, Lets take it down a couple of notches.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 11:07 PM
116

He’s an actor with a position in a multi-billion dollar show, he did the right thing for his career. It’s shitty that he had to redact the statement at all. Feminists say people shouldn’t call out false rape accusations since it “shuts down conversation”. And yet here they are shutting down conversation in sexual objectification.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 01:38 PM
2

“Stop equating ‘Science’ with Truth” I shit my pants from the shear amount of blind-unironic-stupidity in that title.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 01:23 PM
2

I mean, the brain of men and women are different, it's a fact, not bigotry.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 04:12 PM
2

I'm going to unsubscribe if r/cringeanarchy twitter accounts are going to routinely make it to the front page.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 07:41 PM
1

Wow, your reading comprehension must be sub 4th grade. My argument was that these posts do not belong on this sub. You see, the first part of your response IS a counter argument! You did it! Albeit unintentionally.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 08:42 PM
-2

Hahahah! Read your responses again, fucking idiot. I love how you try and dissect what I said, but offer no counter argument. Uniformed, Obvious falsehoods, inform yourself. And yet you offer no new information or way for me to do any of those things. Just the type of person I would expect to leave a "Fuck off you moron" comment.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 05:19 PM
1

You're right, Comic about horses = feminism debunked! How did I not see that!
/r/MensRights27/09/17 04:53 PM
-3

Yes the wage gap is a myth, and that does affect men. But this is just a silly comic making fun of feminist stances. This sub isn't for trashing women, or for poe dunk fucktards like you who actually think this somehow strengthens MR's stance.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 04:52 PM
0

This is anti-fem dogshit, it has nothing to do with men at all. I know retards like you came here for the "Hur-Dur wemen r stoopid" but all that does is make us look like shit.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 04:49 PM
-14

Please keep this shit out of r/MensRights, this is not what our sub is about.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 02:49 AM
3

Because you can't punish someone for something they might do.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 03:03 AM
13

Pwn'd I guess? /s
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:57 PM
3

Yeah OP, r/mensrights has subscribers from all over the political spectrum, don't go shitting on any one group.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 10:45 AM
10

Not exaggerating, my 65 year old grandmother, 2 years after a double lung transplant and 2 years before she died, did 10 push ups in front of me without an unreasonable amount of effort. I loved my grandma more than anything, but I wouldn't EVER want her defending my country's borders, sorry ma.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:56 PM
35

"After 100 years of perfect female dominated culture, men rediscover that they are stronger than women, oh woe is the day."
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:54 PM
1

Blatantly not true. But Ok. The saying is that the strongest man is always stronger than the strongest woman.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:50 PM
1

I mean come on.... its the air force..
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:50 PM
5

Cut the shit with the emotes in the title, makes us look like a bunch of whiny teenagers.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:19 PM
4

Why burden themselves and their customers with these silly legal work-arounds instead of politely asking women to refrain from entering?
/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:04 PM
6

Would you make the same argument against women only gyms?
/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:00 PM
2

See that is where we get into a lot of problems, we shouldn't stop people from doing anything, we should just allow all people to do it equally. Instead of saying no one can have a gender segregated business, why not say everyone can? Why take something away instead of giving it to both/all parties?
/r/MensRights07/08/17 06:59 PM
10

Well I think it's pretty obvious that this salon wants to function as more of a "No girl allowed" club. And furthermore, any private business has the right to turn away customers for any reason.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 06:54 PM
1

Oh come on.... there are black male cops..
/r/MensRights07/08/17 02:00 AM
1

More like 5-6.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 03:54 PM
24

Nice to see that that sub recovered.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 08:53 PM
2

How is that your response?
/r/MensRights24/07/17 05:50 PM
2

You literally think that a female action star will lead to women thinking they can fight men. This is delusional. I don't watch a Jason Borne movie and think I can fight 4 guys at once, or that I can hit a target at 500 meters w/ a handgun. Now I can only assume you have realized your mistake and are using the names of psychology studies to in turn appear smarter. Edit: Oh! And the 3 or 4 other people in this thread who pointed out the same thing I did, you downvoted all of them.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:44 PM
2

Lol, you're fuckin' stupid. Real life isn't a fucking movie.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 12:11 AM
2

Yeah wtf are you talking about? There are good female action characters. I have never in my life seen a woman mix herself up in a bar fight w/ a man. This is a shitty movie w/ a shitty premise, it doesn't make female characters like black widow/wonder woman less cool.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 10:29 AM
4

That's exactly the point, they are paid more out of basic laws of the economy, not because of some over arching sexism.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 07:30 AM
3

Holy shit, this comment should be at the top since most people (myself included) only skimmed the article. How are you going to say what men find attractive when YOU AREN'T EVEN TESTING MEN!?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 08:09 PM
9

To be honest, we all like to be fat and lazy, you just don't hear men bitching about women not finding their saggy-soggy man-titties attractive. At Least not as often.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 08:02 PM
67

What the fuck? Why Mount & Blade????
/r/PussyPass19/04/17 02:17 AM
33

Well if they built the fortune together, she does deserve her share. Now when it comes to cheating on your partner the line blurs, she did break a contract and should have seen penalties for it.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 06:35 PM
1

This is despicable, I hate that feminists call men entitled for doing stuff like looking at them or saying no.Especially when the thought that you can hit someone with no repercussions is a literal example of entitlement. But those were no doubt the best punches I have ever seen a girl throw, usually they either flail or hammer fist, this chick was jabbin' like Ali. That dude has a stone jaw, man.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 04:19 AM
-1

"Debunked" is a strong word, its more just a voicing of the argument against, which is to be expected in any controversial topic.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:20 AM
10

Poignant post, not positive what its relevance is to men's rights.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 01:25 AM
1

you are the one who started the snarky comments, I already agreed that perhaps "rape" is not the best term to describe what happened in this case, but I think the point of the post was more about how if the sexes had been reversed people WOULD have considered it a rape even though nothing has changed aside from the gender of the parties.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 07:19 AM
1

You're right, this teacher did nothing wrong, I'm sorry.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 05:20 AM
1

Well no, she fucked her life up by fucking a child. I'm sure there are plenty of guys who would have had her.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 12:44 AM
1

I did, I'm glad the author pointed that out, but seriously, what is with the almost apologetic tone towards the rapist?
/r/MensRights19/01/17 12:23 AM
3

The first of your links is about a 19 year old sleeping with a supposed 17 year old for which there would be no punishment, he was only punished after it came out she was 14. Thanks for wasting my time. The second one is between a 19 and 15 year old, well outside of the age range that I had mentioned in my earlier comment. Your fifth link reiterates exactly what I said Laws around the world define the socially appropriate age of consent anywhere from 13 to 18. Anyone under that limit can bone an…
/r/MensRights19/01/17 12:21 AM
5

Well you seem wholly unaware of statutory rape laws now that I more fully understand your point, not surprised, the condescending cunts are always the stupid ones. Kids under the age of 18 are allowed to fuck each other all they want, and most places have laws where you can engage with someone sexually if you are within a certain range of ages (1-2 years I think). So no, some high-school lovers are not rapists or sex offenders in any way, emotionally or legally. I would go as far to say that lea…
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:48 PM
3

Oh you think so huh? I wonder how terrible rush hour traffic is on that lil' 'Ol thing called the autobahn.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:42 PM
2

You sound like a guy who makes wild and unfounded assumptions.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:20 PM
4

I guess fucking so. What I am wondering is if we are on the same page why did you bother to transcribe the fucking Iliad into your shitty comment and send it to my inbox.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:20 PM
2

Wait, are you saying the boy should be punished?
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:12 PM
2

Punching someone capable of defending themselves =/= being a father at 13.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:11 PM
4

Okay, a small percentage of people in America likely have the physical and mental capability of driving 160 MPH on the highway without endangering anyone around them or themselves, just because some people are capable of it doesn't mean there should not be laws forbidding it. Children are on the whole stupid and easily manipulated, I would say especially young boys. So if we deem that one boy had enough foresight to see the possible consequences of his actions and allowed him to fuck a 20 year o…
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:10 PM
1

Hell if I know, I am not attracted to little kids.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:06 PM
3

So you say I am arguing arbitrarily over laws, while you are doing the same thing over words. If you so desperately want to split hairs don't call it 'rape', call it In ability to consent like in your example of being drunk or drugged. The fact of the matter remains that the boy and the teacher had a very inappropriate sexual relationship and she should be punished duly. Imagine if a 25 or so year old man had sex with a incredibly horny 13 year old girl, what would you call that?
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:03 PM
2143

Honest to god, the way the article paints it, it DOES sound like this kid seduced her. But statutory rape is still rape, it exists because underage kids are not capable of making good decisions in regards to sexual relationships.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 04:25 PM
1

Relatively/pound for pound she is saying she's the best tennis player.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 06:59 PM
3

I think you guys are confusing what she said. She is obviously not saying that if she were allowed to compete in men's tennis she would beat the top ranked men. She is saying that if she had been a man and had the equivalent of her career in men's tennis that she would be considered the greatest of all time, which may or may not be true, I'm not a huge tennis buff.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 06:57 PM
-7

ITT: Fuck women, men rule.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 08:47 PM
8

He makes it painfully obvious that he has no idea what he is talking about. He's just making jokes.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 02:40 AM
25

"When Smith didn't react strongly enough for her, she started hitting him with open hands." How fucking retarded is this woman? Her 6'2, 220 pound boyfriend just TANKED a pot of BOILING WATER!! And she thinks it's a good idea to FUCKING HIT THIS PERSON!?!?!
/r/MensRights10/11/16 05:29 PM
1

Oh boy... You went through some serious mental gymnastics there. No, I do not thinking owning a daughter is a form of slavery. Haha. I think if you own another human, THEY ARE THE SLAVE. Jesus fuck, if the guy didn't want to own a daughter he could just not have had a daughter. Same with slaves. And, for the last time, I did not say always, in fact I said the exact opposite. Please reread my original comment and you will see that what I am telling you is true.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 12:15 AM
1

Well Jesus Christ man, that's all I said in the beginning, you started the whole argument! All I said was typically women have been more oppressed then men, even if that has not held true in all cases. Typically is probably accurate Those were my exact words.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 11:55 PM
1

Name some laws or regulations that negatively effect only men. That are not in modern times.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 11:27 PM
0

... Oh shit... You're right! Puts on tin foil hat I bet women being considered their father's property was fabricated as well! And the fact that women weren't allowed to vote until 1920 is just made up! The notion that a rape victim in parts of the world can be beheaded for infidelity if she is female is also likely just rumors and nonsense. Proof Proof Proof Oh.. Wait, no, I guess not...
/r/MensRights06/11/16 10:59 PM
-3

Maybe because for thousands of years it was fine to beat the fuck out of your wife? Which is just 1 example.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 03:39 PM
29

I mean, women were the sex oppressed for thousands of years. "Typically" is probably accurate, you notice however that it doesn't say "always".
/r/MensRights06/11/16 02:43 AM
1

Ok, so instead of him defending himself he engaged in a consensual scuffle with another adult. He still isn't in the wrong for winning.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:04 PM
1

Oh dude, have you ever heard Kathleen Madigan? She's absolutely hilarious.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 06:48 PM
6

Oh wow, really? I'd never heard that.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 10:39 PM
58

I didn't even mind the SJW stuff, everyone has a message. I hated that she stole jokes from other comedians because people stopped laughing at her "OMG I'm such a slut." jokes.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:04 PM
19

Bill Burr said it best, there is an epidemic of gold digging whores.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 05:23 AM
5

They aren't segregated, if there was a female soccer player who could burn defenders and punch holes in soccer nets, they would be recruited by a major league soccer team. At the professional level a team will do whatever it takes to win, I am positive no team would turn away a star soccer player if she was a female.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 05:01 AM
1

Professional sports in my opinion would be the most UNBIASED platform when it comes to gender. If there was a woman who crushed every 102 MPH fast ball thrown at her out of every MLB stadium with a wooden bat, there are literally 0 teams that would turn her away because she had a vagina. If any woman could preform as well as a male athlete, they would play in men's professional sports. I sure as shit know that if a female football player was getting back to back 100 yard games, that I would want…
/r/MensRights30/05/16 02:51 AM
2

I'm with you there, I'm just saying you don't really waste a vote voting for who ever you think is best, but you do by not participating.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 03:15 AM
2

Yah know, I do have one positive thing to say about Trump, he is supposedly a supporter of NASA. And when in a race where we are comparing awful qualities to see who has the least horrific views, something like that might be a deciding factor.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 03:14 AM
4

I agree all the candidates are shitty, but not voting actually will just increase the chance of us getting the worst candidate into office, in times like these you really just have to vote for the shiniest turd.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 01:37 AM
1

There's already a law for that. Charge them with lible or slander.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 01:53 AM
2

Well what if you really did get raped and for one reason or another can't prove it? Should you still be charged with a sentence?
/r/MensRights15/04/16 12:45 AM
2

Why does this look like a "Cards Against Humanity" card?
/r/MensRights15/04/16 12:37 AM
2

haha, oh, ok. So what are you trying to say, i thought both of the reporters in that video were rather reasonable.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 05:30 AM
11

What the fuck are you saying? Reread your comment and tell me if it makes any sense.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 06:10 AM
7

I don't understand what you are trying to say.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 03:55 AM
-15

I like how you got downvoted. Either people really don't know how the internet works, or they're just too new to 4chan to understand.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 05:45 PM
3

I will take some hate for this, but on the real doh. Evolutionary men are really made to be disposable.Think about it, stone age shit. Think if there were a tribe of 1'000 men and 1 woman, how many children could they bare, 1, it takes 9 months to make a child so if you are lucky you could get twins, but mostly likely, one a year which for survival purposes, not a great ratio. but if there were 1,000 women and 1 man, how many children could the tribe bare a year? the answer 1'000!. Find me the m…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 07:40 AM
1

I have a feeling she won't be so happy she did this if (God Forbid) any thing bad ever does happen to her.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 10:28 PM
16

Oh no! Where else will I go for an intelligent conversation about how much better I am than all religious people?
/r/MensRights03/01/16 05:22 PM
2

He even went through that logically with her though, even if you aren't a U.S citizen, you are still subject to our laws when on U.S ground. It's the same fucking anywhere.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 07:56 PM
1

I think he was trying to say that the knee-jerk reaction of some people when they hear about a situation like this is "atta-boy!" which is about as much of a defense as saying men can't be raped.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 03:26 AM
3

At first I disagreed with you comment, but as I thought about it more I realized how correct you were. If a truly sensational female athlete was capable of competing on a professional level along side men, teams in every sport would pick her up. If there was a girl who could kick 75 yard field goals, every NFL team in the nation would be interested in her, they don't care about what their players carry between their legs, they care about winning games.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 01:33 AM
1

Sir Charge
/r/MensRights27/07/15 12:31 AM
54

Oh so you only value her for her looks! Male oppressive pig!
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:32 PM
1

Why would labels like that concern you? Do you think that your political opponents are completely incapable of forming logical, well founded ideas?
/r/MensRights12/07/15 08:55 PM
2

At 3:50, was that the girl who protested the slut walk a few weeks ago?
/r/MensRights30/06/15 10:48 PM
0

Good thing my family line is FUCKING TINY.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter