| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings1) What you gave is not a reason, it's a description. Yes we want a treated and untreated group, but why? Controlling for the placebo effect is one reason, but it comes under the larger bracket of confounding factors, as many of which should be controlled for as possible. I used controls to test the effectiveness of hormones on plant growth - and they sure as hell don't experience placebo effects with no CNS. We used the controls to make sure that the environment we grew the plant in, the exact … | /r/MensRights | 07/11/17 01:16 PM |
| 1 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findingsSummoning /u/locks_are_paranoid bc I don't want to type this out again. If taking a baseline measurement was a suitable substitute for a control group, why would anyone use them? You'd be paying for more subjects, paying more staff to monitor them, creating more admin for yourselves, and for what? More importantly, why would scientists bother taking a baseline if they are already using a control group? The reason why is that the baseline data and control group are used for different things. The … | /r/MensRights | 07/11/17 12:16 PM |
| 2 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findingsIt doesn't matter if it was a preliminary experiment - it still isn't valid and as I pointed out, it's clear that we're missing a large portion of the story. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 11:12 PM |
| 1 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findingsOK, before anyone gets worked up, I think MGM is abhorrent and we should all have a right to foreskins. I am however reserving judgement on the regulations until I have read them myself. That said, this study caught my eye for looking somewhat suspect, and it just got worse and worse the more I looked. No control. This invalidates the result entirely. Without a child put in the exact same position minus only the snip itself, there's nothing to say that the trauma wasn't caused by being restraine… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 11:00 PM |
| 1 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findingsThat still doesn't address the lack of a control. I know it seems pedantic, but you've got to control for factors like restraining the baby's head and body, placing them in the confined (and possibly noisy) MRI Scanner with a stranger, who fiddles with their bits for the same amount of time using a blunt knife and bell. Basically do everything but snip, to exclude the possibility of any other factors causing the trauma, because a control is not merely a non-treatment group. It's an identical-but… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 10:06 PM |
| 1 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findingsYou don't get to skimp on controls just because you have a baseline measurement. That's bad science. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 07:32 PM |
| 3 | Irony Time - The Red Pill Wins "Women In Film Award"Good on her! Don't see how it's ironic though. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/17 08:33 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter