| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findingsOK, before anyone gets worked up, I think MGM is abhorrent and we should all have a right to foreskins. I am however reserving judgement on the regulations until I have read them myself. That said, this study caught my eye for looking somewhat suspect, and it just got worse and worse the more I looked. No control. This invalidates the result entirely. Without a child put in the exact same position minus only the snip itself, there's nothing to say that the trauma wasn't caused by being restraine… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 11:00 PM |
| 1 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findingsThat still doesn't address the lack of a control. I know it seems pedantic, but you've got to control for factors like restraining the baby's head and body, placing them in the confined (and possibly noisy) MRI Scanner with a stranger, who fiddles with their bits for the same amount of time using a blunt knife and bell. Basically do everything but snip, to exclude the possibility of any other factors causing the trauma, because a control is not merely a non-treatment group. It's an identical-but… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 10:06 PM |
| 1 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findingsYou don't get to skimp on controls just because you have a baseline measurement. That's bad science. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 07:32 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter