TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kilnaga Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by Kilnaga on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, I don't think they should be. But I take the position that such public lists of sexual predators should not exist in the first place.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 03:35 AM
3

I believe that it's a natural, instinctual drive. Then you would believe incorrectly. We actually used to have default custody land with the father until feminists pushed the Tender Years Doctrine on us.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:17 PM
6

Traditionalist men don't, and that's the rub. This doesn't make any sense to me. I mean, traditionally, almost all men had crazy, flowing, long hair and massive beards (What with local Barber Shops and SuperCuts not exactly being a thing throughout most of history). It really isn't until more modern times that men started wearing their hair shorter. And to all those silly traditionalists: if long hair was good enough for Jesus, why isn't it cool with you? D:
/r/MensRights26/09/15 07:43 AM
3

DC isn't a state and doesn't have a Governor.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:01 PM
1

http://rationalrevolution.net/articles/redefining_the_political_spectru.htm
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:47 AM
2

Please explain further. How is it "actually over-socialization" exactly? In what way(s)?
/r/MensRights29/12/14 09:39 PM
1

Hahahaha, like America will let you stop paying taxes so easily.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 08:55 AM
1

What kind of shit prostitute doesn't take the payment up front before handing over the goods?
/r/MensRights18/12/14 08:54 AM
1

Because the circumcised men need more masturbation in order to get off, what with having less nerve endings in their penises perhaps?
/r/MensRights18/12/14 08:44 AM
5

Why the divide still? Let's scrap both of those as well and stick to "Human Rights."
/r/MensRights23/11/14 11:42 AM
2

Yet another fancy degree to place on one's resume for the position of Starbucks barista.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 10:52 AM
2

Expecting radfems to have a sense of humor. How cute.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:24 AM
2

Dude, those are all like, fucking fantastic reasons to do this. I jump constantly because I get bored and like smashing buttons to occupy my time. Pretty much the only reason I jump constantly. I need to be engaged in games I play. I can't just stand around a town, or the outside of an instance and wait patiently. I need to be doing something or I'll get bored and disengage from the game. So I jump. And jump. And jump, jump, jump. I also run in circles (or figure eights) around groups of people.…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 09:55 AM
3

I'm sure all those kids who got dropped off at hospitals/police departments/fire stations sure have a bone to pick with the mother who abandoned them there too. We totally already have children who grow up pissed they were abandoned, this change wouldn't be anything new other than allowing men the same options as women.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 05:17 AM
3

What's so bad about that is a preponderance of evidence standard is actually less of an evidentiary standard than the whole beyond a reasonable doubt thing. It requires less proof, not more, for a conviction. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_burden_of_proof
/r/MensRights28/03/14 06:27 AM
3

Go watch The Matrix or Terminator. Now, realize it is the Humanists who started that fight by not granting equal rights to sentient beings. What? Terminator? Didn't Skynet nuke the planet practically the second it came online? Humanity didn't have much time to deny Skynet shit before it took everybody out.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 04:43 AM
2

Lysistrata is hilarious. It involves most of the characters running around stage wearing giant leather phalluses.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 04:28 AM
25

That is one extreme pussy pass.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:25 AM
1

But certain issues it propagates are just premised and argued incorrectly. Like your comment here? You set up a nice false equivalency to get away with saying this: Men, even as potential victims, have more agency when it comes to rape One gender possessing more individual agency than another is quite the opposite of what the MRA spouts off. The real equivalency would be to do what an earlier poster up the page said to do, just turn the genders around. Being penetrated against your will by multi…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 11:40 AM
1

What's that story about the monkey and the pleasure button? Doesn't it starve itself to death via endless masturbation? Pretty much what humans would do.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 10:53 AM
1

I completely agree. The problem really stems from how children are raised and implanted with cultural bias/gender roles. It's the much bigger societal problem that needs to get solved. But hey, until then why not throw money at programs of the type we know haven't worked in the past, that'll fix things, right?
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:24 PM
1

I think you've touched on both parts of the problem, just didn't put the two together. As you've said they trying to rope in more female programmers. Your own anecdotal experience tells us the small percentage of females who tend to go into tech/engineering fields have had tech/engineering as a hobby for years. I don't see how paying highschool girls to take one programming course is going to engender years of experience and enjoyment of a hobby that gets turned into a career. You need to catch …
/r/MensRights01/03/14 07:46 AM
1

I'm not saying they don't. You were the one saying English didn't have a gender neutral pronoun, which it does.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 07:21 AM
2

Somebody has clearly never heard of singular "they." They/them/their, gender neutral pronoun. So hard to use this word over him/her, nobody who speaks English has ever heard of these words. Nope, no sir, they don't exist.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 07:04 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they Learn some grammar.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 11:04 AM
2

Why does it have to? The comment at the top of the tree is "in-cited facts from a smug looking dude." I'm referencing the first part of his comment, un-cited facts. I don't see any reason why the two HAVE to be related, you're the one forcing that connection here.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 11:11 AM
2

I think part of the rift here is that when they say presentation, you think "the way the guy looks." When they are saying presentation, they we talking about the message as a whole. You said is information is accurate, and it is. The problem with the PRESENTATION of this information, as many of already stated, is that he did NOT cite his information. Random "numbers and facts" brought up as such without citation/statistics/etc backing it up can be easily written off by the people the message is …
/r/MensRights24/02/14 10:23 AM
5

Indeed, I'm all for "Respect is given, but can be taken away."
/r/MensRights23/02/14 12:35 PM
4

People with the foresight to be prepared to defend themselves if threaten with violence don't belong in society? But people who go around attacking others with physical violence, no matter the level of force, do belong then?
/r/MensRights23/02/14 12:23 PM
6

I'm sorry, if somebody else has already thrown the first punch, it isn't my actions that decide if the fight starts. The fight has ALREADY STARTED. Although just because the fight has already started doesn't mean one has to choose to continue. This line of thinking is crazy radfem BS. "The woman hitting the man isn't starting the fight, it's the man's actions that start the fight."
/r/MensRights23/02/14 12:21 PM
1

That makes Dent a completely separate breed of completely fucking crazy. "I don't like the ratio of male to female paedophiles. Solution: make more female kiddie diddlers." Like w.t.f.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:41 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:36 AM
1

The side of the mountain doesn't discriminate. If you can't hack the slope you shouldn't be competing, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:05 AM
2

Making a fake Facebook, lying about her age. Deleting the Facebook, recreating it months later. RECREATING IT MONTHS LATER, doesn't sound like "some silly mistake" but a rather planned out/intentionally malicious affair to me.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 09:10 AM
1

People were getting married in ancient Egypt looooooooooong before the Ambrahamic religions popped up. Those guys didn't even really get too heavily in marriage until they were around for quite a few centuries. Marriage as an institution is really little more than some property/contract law. Laws for inheritance for instance could be established once we had legal contracts like marriage to help enforce them.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 01:52 PM
2

Except it belonged to the realm of law before it did religion. Early property law to establish/regulate/etc the buying/selling/bartering of women for lands/goods/money.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:09 AM
0

Yes, equating it to ass-grabbing in order to dismiss it. He mentioned "sexual assault and rape." Idk, but last time I checked rape was quite a bit more than a little "ass-grabbing." I'd say the comparison is quite apt, not that much difference between getting stabbed with a penis over a knife.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:24 AM
14

No it isn't. The left/right divide is a scale on economic/fiscal issues ranging between Communist collectivism and neoliberalism/American libertarians. The up down scale goes between fascist authoritarians and anarchic libertarians. Communism is not the opposite of fascism. Complete fucking anarchy is.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:13 AM
22

Or almost always get custody in a divorce.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 02:07 PM
2

"Political Correctness" is bunk. It is the acceptable face of prejudice, sexism, racism, etc.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 11:16 AM
-2

I really don't think men or women should be getting jail time for something like this. Forced institutionalization with proper mental health care professionals would probably be the more beneficial route, as somebody doing something that crazy has something wrong with them.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 05:42 PM
2

No, that would actually be something they'd want as explained above. Women laugh more AT jokes than men. So a female audience would be a good thing. It's the female panelists/comedians that don't get as many laughs as men.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 06:22 AM
1

Could you expand on this perchance? I've heard plenty of people trot out the link between roe v wade and crime rates but I've never seen discussed lead paint as a causal link in that argument. It sounds interesting, and if there is science backing it up, I'd be interested in seeing it.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 12:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter