TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kiltan Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by Kiltan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Actually it's heart disease. But did you mean physical damage leading to death? Well in that case it's vehicles.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 10:12 PM
8

First of all you clearly have no fucking idea what Occam's Razor is because that is not an example of it. Secondly nobody said white males' problems are worse or more important than other's problems.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 10:07 PM
10

Is it really that hard as a female?
/r/MensRights21/10/16 10:05 PM
1

Yep, it appears that we both have one. It's more of a belief really.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 02:38 AM
1

lol I think you know you were being facetious. But I do believe a substantial amount of people hold the opinion, but I can't prove that. That's my belief. I know it's an opinion, I just don't know how common it is.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 02:31 AM
1

And your argument is there are technically people in the world who don't think it? How exactly is that any more concrete? At least I provided examples. It is a problem for comedians to present bullshit information as facts and manipulate public opinion in doing so. That's all my point ever was. The only reason we went off on this ridiculous tangent is because all you cared about was "winning" and after I proved you wrong when you claimed I was making stuff up (which you then refused to take resp…
/r/MensRights21/10/16 02:19 AM
1

Could you stick to one reply next time and not force me to respond to 3 separate comments? I never specified how many people. I never said all people. I didn't even say most people. I just said people. I provided proof for that statement. Yet you continue to pretend that I haven't and continue to say the burden of proof is on me, despite me already backing up my claim. If you want to continue to refuse that my statement is true despite providing evidence then the burden of proof is now on you, s…
/r/MensRights21/10/16 02:04 AM
1

you only provided a single example Meanwhile you have provided nothing. Unless your point is some people on the internet think that, which is very different than 'people' What in the actual fuck are you talking about? People on the internet are not people? Here's another article for you: http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/1672758 Your turn.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 01:42 AM
1

Now you're just making shit up. And actually I did provide proof for my claim. Which is that many people trust comedians more than the media. That's when you said I'm just making shit up. So I proved it to you with, yes, opinions from the internet, which I'm still not sure why you refused to accept that, since that is literally what the claim was to begin with, that people (who may or may not be on the internet, irrelevant) share this opinion. I may not know how widespread the belief is, but I p…
/r/MensRights21/10/16 01:10 AM
1

My point in asking you to back up your side of the argument was that you can't claim that my claim is wrong when you have no data to suggest people trust the media more than comedians, on the other hand, I actually do have good reason for believing in my claim, which just so happens to go against yours. Therefore the evidence is more strongly on my side than it is yours. And yes, you did explicitly say that I made it up.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 12:47 AM
1

It really doesn't matter what I say because you've got your mind made up. First you say "you made that up" and when I proved you wrong on that you countered with "lol you read it on the internet" or "that article doesn't count" it's like arguing with a brick wall.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 12:00 AM
1

Dude, I provided as much evidence as possible. Again, there are not any official statistics on this one specific claim. What do you expect me to do? I gave examples of the opinion being popular, coupled with the statistic on trust of media. I think any reasonable person would be able to see what direction it's leaning toward.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:51 PM
2

You're right, I guess all these people saying the exact same thing and all of the people that agree with them are just, I don't know, robots? Programs? I guess they're not real people sharing the same opinion? If you say so. And like I said, this one is obvious, I wouldn't have had to even search for it on the internet if you hadn't been so stubborn in your ignorance of the obvious.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:40 PM
2

I'm sorry that there's not currently a poll, but unless you're living under a rock it should be a rather obvious observation, which is why many websites have written articles on it, and many shower thoughts and famous twitter users have posted the popular "We used to listen to politicians and laugh at comedians, now we listen to comedians and laugh at politicians." With politicians it's the same thing as the news, like I said with my 2nd link which you didn't have a rebuttal for, less than half …
/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:19 PM
-1

Actually it's pretty commonly well known. There are several articles that talk about how people trust comedians more than journalists, here's my top google result: https://medium.com/@rosekellywhite/do-we-trust-comedians-more-than-journalists-1a4b46a6588b#.i8jyk89gg Contrast this with the fact that trust in the media is at an all-time low: http://www.gallup.com/poll/185927/americans-trust-media-remains-historical-low.aspx
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:53 PM
0

People would definitely not like what I said, but I'd be in the clear from being called out for spewing random horseshit as undeniable fact, just because of my profession. Remember we live in a time where people take comedians more seriously than newscasters. They (often) present truth in a funny and ironic, socially satirical way. This trend has been going on for decades. It's common sense to be able to tell when a joke is just a joke, and when a joke is poking fun at a truthful observation, wh…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:33 PM
-1

It doesn't matter if he's a comedian or not, he's presenting something as a fact, not an opinion. He makes as if he is joking about a factual statement. That's the point of his joke, to provoke the thought, "why do women still trust us, given these facts?" Which works great, when it's not total bullshit. It's like me getting on stage and saying, "Did you know, and I swear this is true, you can fact check me if you want to. 100% of the rapes in Berlin are caused by Middle Eastern migrants. 100%, …
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:06 PM
-3

I didn't say that. I said he is saying something as if it is fact. You can't say "Globally and historically men are the #1 threat to women. Want to know what the #1 threat to men is? Heart disease." When there is no truth to the statement. It's one thing to joke about women going out with strange men who may hurt them, it's another thing to rattle off this bullshit, deliberately making it sound like a fact. Especially when he couldn't be further from the truth. This "difference" between men and …
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:45 PM
-11

That's like me saying "Black people literally all steal and commit murder! Every single one of them!" And then when people get mad about it saying, "Calm down I was just joking. Didn't you notice the stage and microphone?" He's making an absurd statement, passing it off as fact. I don't give a fuck if he's a comedian or not. Obviously it has had negative social implications since, like I said, this school used his quote verbatim to "teach" their students.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:16 PM
-9

Except the problem is a). This school or company took what he said, verbatim, and claimed it as fact. This is their fault, not his. And b). He's dead wrong. He's not just exaggerating. He's saying that quite literally men are the #1 threat of death and injury to women, and that for men it's heart disease. Well that's a stupid thing to say because the #1 threat of death to women is also heart disease.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:47 PM
3

Or the fact that women are more likely than men to provoke a domestic violence attack.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 02:51 AM
13

Get em before 8 or it's too late is a motto of the ruling elite that has more sinister meanings than just one.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 02:50 AM
1

All childhoods should be like MY childhood!
/r/MensRights11/10/16 08:06 AM
3

Take it from someone who has posted things like this on Facebook, you will not change any minds, and yes your close ones will view you differently. They'll think you're sexist/racist/ignorant. The brainwashing is very strong. They're zombies. You can't teach zombies to stop being zombies.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:27 AM
0

Cool, glad I could be of service!
/r/MensRights29/08/16 11:46 PM
1

My sister's husband spends about an hour every afternoon sitting in the van while it is running and the children are sleeping in the back seat, so that my sister can take a nap by herself in the house. I wish I was kidding.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/16 06:11 PM
0

If you don't know the reason for that you should look into some statistics.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 03:59 PM
7

Is it though? I haven't seen any numbers but off hand I would assume women are on average more than 33% less physically as strong as men. Most men, even those that don't lift, could probably lift a lot more than 33% more than women.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/16 05:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter