| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | [FR] Kiss closed two sisters at the same time at the bar. Was on the brink of an F-closeThe fact that it was taken even remotely seriously kinda scares me. | /r/seduction | 23/10/13 08:32 AM |
| 2 | Looks Don't MatterIf you look better automatically, then yeah, you've got the table set for you, and your failure will likely be more based on the fact that you "fucked something up." For those of us who aren't naturally attractive, we don't have that benefit in most cases. We have to make up for it in other ways -- and since we generally can't change our looks, we have to figure out how to do it in those other ways. But this is the point. Looks do matter, they just all that matters. | /r/seduction | 16/11/12 01:01 AM |
| 2 | What are some tips for a guy at the beginning of a relationship?The look on his dad's face was amazing. | /r/seduction | 11/03/12 09:44 PM |
| 5 | What are some tips for a guy at the beginning of a relationship?Kriiiisten, you're such a good liiiiistener. | /r/seduction | 11/03/12 08:11 PM |
| 1 | This about sums it up.Certainly, though I'd prefer people just used birth control and avoided the issue in the first place. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/11 02:17 AM |
| 1 | This about sums it up.Yes, technically the father can...if he has sole custody of the child within the first 30 days...but how likely is that? Since we're talking about legality, technically is really all that matters. Just because the woman has an easier time doing it doesn't make it any more 'unfair'. The bottom line is just that, within the legal system, men need a way to secede their parental rights after conception and before childbirth (or a very limited time thereafter, which they'd need permission from the ot… | /r/MensRights | 27/08/11 02:16 AM |
| 1 | This about sums it up.No parent, male or not should be forced to be a parent against their will up until the point the child is born. Once you agree and the child is born, you're in it for the long haul as far as I'm concerned. Barring extenuating circumstances, once you have a kid you lose the right to just go "nope, sorry, I don't feel like it so I'm out of here" as far as I'm concerned. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/11 02:02 AM |
| 1 | This about sums it up.Well technically the father can do that as well, after the baby is born. That has nothing to do with "men's rights" and everything to do with poor parenting and maturity. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/11 10:44 PM |
| 1 | This about sums it up.Oh no, I have no problem with a man not wanting to be a father. It's a lot of pressure and responsibility on a person and not something to be taken lightly or without consent. My point is that when a father decides sometime during the pregnancy that he's not ready and wants out, the child is going to be born anyway, as biologically, he has no way to terminate the pregnancy without the mother's consent. If a mother decides during a pregnancy she's not ready one of two things happens: 1) She abort… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/11 10:43 PM |
| 1 | This about sums it up.Court. Sue for custody. If he had partial custody, then she doesn't have the legal right to give up full custody to the state, which is a requirement for legal adoption. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/11 10:19 PM |
| 1 | This about sums it up.I did, I probably just wasn't clear about it. I think that adoption should be considered on a case by case basis (as it's done now), if the woman can prove that as a single parent she has the means to give the child a loving home and to provide for him/her there's no reason not to allow it. As long as she's financially and emotionally capable of caring for the child, no. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/11 10:19 PM |
| 1 | This about sums it up.Safe haven laws are also vastly different state to state, and much of their legality is still open for interpretation. A father who wanted his child back if the mother abandoned it does have legal recourse, though it'd be without precedent (as far as I'm aware). | /r/MensRights | 26/08/11 09:48 PM |
| 1 | This about sums it up.I should've clarified that the mother has the option to take it to term and then put the baby up for adoption as an alternative to abortion, but that's just a middle of the road compromise between the two. Adoption isn't an option unless both parents don't want the baby and choose to not abort. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/11 09:16 PM |
| 3 | This about sums it up.What you've done here is nonchalantly implied that abortion is not a big factor when analyzing the ethics on this topic. I was mostly just setting the ethics of abortion aside. It was just a simple statement of fact that if the mother has an abortion, there's no child to support anymore. For the purposes of discussion, it's common to just ignore facets that are only tangentially related. Do you think women should be allowed to be single mothers by their own choosing? If a woman wants to go to th… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/11 09:14 PM |
| 12 | This about sums it up.The problem I think he has, and I agree with to certain extent, is that the situation at the end of the day ends up different. If the woman chooses to abort, there is no child to support. If the man chooses to not be a parent, the child is still alive, just bereft a parent. The alternative when parties disagree would be to either force an abortion or force the woman to carry it to term, both of which I don't think I'm comfortable with. The existing system is by no means perfect, but I'm not sure… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/11 05:14 PM |
| 2 | Any "female PUA" books?The soldering burns build character. | /r/seduction | 12/08/11 02:51 PM |
| 2 | I'm TofuTofu. Ask Me Anything about Japanese girls.Welcome to asia. | /r/seduction | 09/07/11 12:01 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter