TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kimba93 Archive

View 0 posts and 158 comments by Kimba93 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Stop making individual dating autonomy into social issues. This would literally end 95% of the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 09:55 AM
1

Whilst those in support of changing the law to recognise this But does the case in Northern Ireland (slide 8) not show that the law already allows women to be charged with rape?
/r/MensRights09/10/23 12:00 PM
1

Yes, because men complimenting me is, by and large, rather meaningless. I guess you see men as emotionally disposable? You don't even value nice words from them? Men don't believe themselves to inherently be owed compliments. Of course not. It's not men. It's men like you, who talk about how lonely men are because hot women don't compliment them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 01:45 AM
1

I literally follow this sub too. Come on.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 01:43 AM
2

Jesus Christ, you say it out loud. You don't dance around it. "I don't want compliments from men, I want compliments from women, unprompted, preferably from women I'm trying to attract, at best case gorgeous supermodels with great personalities." Not many men are so open about their entitlement. Thank you for saying what probably many men think secretely. "Men never get compliments!!" = "Hot women should compliment me."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 01:28 AM
2

men not engaging in the exact same forms of affection that they crave in women. This is absurd, the narratives "No one cares about men" or "No one gives men compliments" are meant as no one, both men and women. Men don't say "I find it sad that women never give me compliments", they say "I find it sad that no one gives me compliments." You making it all about women shows how ridiculously entitled many men feel though, you literally say men need compliments from women but not from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 01:12 AM
1

Absolutely not, we care about women's issues and support solving them. You mean in "Tell women to date the bottom 80% of men"? This is you caring about "women's issues"? Same can't be said about women for men. More women are interested in actual men's issues than men themselves. More women are against the draft or foreign interventions, most social workers who help homeless are women, women love supporting men. Unfortunately, many men still think "supporting men" can only mean "Give men more sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 04:51 PM
1

Just that they see the world as women being on their team, and men not being on their team. This is just false. If anything, it's more men who have this binary thinking. How are these things misogynistic lol? Incels are one of the most disgusting, degenerate scum of the Earth. They not only openly call to enslave women, they even encourage each other to kill themselves. Redpillers spend all their time in their "debates" calling women whores, cum buckets, narcissistic liars, etc., and only give a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 04:40 PM
1

I'm speaking about the majority in western countries The majority of women in Western countries has nothing against men, I would say the majority is more pro-men than men themselves. which redpillers, MGTOWs or MRAs are generally not incels, redpillers, MGTOW and MRA are the most disgusting misogynists coming from the West, the fact that you think they'e not misogynistic at all shows how broken your worldview is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 04:20 PM
1

We don't see the world as "us and them" when it comes to women. There is no "we", not all men are the same. Of course many men see women as "the other" and are against helping them and even for oppressing them, especially the modern misogyny (incels, redpillers, MGTOW, MRA) but of course "classical misogynists" ("women don't deserve rights", Islamic patriarchy) too. It's ridiculous to think there aren't many men who see women as "the other" that are hostile to them in many ways. My goodness, jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 11:52 PM
1

do you think women can do no wrong? WTF?? Of course women can do wrong. They can kill, beat, rape, steal, lie, deceive, etc., like men. There was a story of a man on Reddit whose wife killed his two children after he threatened to leave her because she was cheating. Women can do all evil things. Still this sub is misogyny on steroids. The comment I quoted was an example as well as your reaction to my comment (accusing me of denying women can be evil simply because I pointed out at misogyny).
/r/MensRights11/09/23 06:05 PM
0

The mechanism of the M/F apartheid is becoming well enough known. Oestrogen closes down a great deal of right-brain processing, post-adolescence. While this prepares for women's role as a genetic filter, it also insulates from daily dosis (sic) of reality. Another dosis of women-are-evil effect here, thanks for proving it.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 03:54 PM
-4

IMHO, the 4x higher male suicide figures result from female inability to recognise male problems, or ascribe any meaningful weight to them. The world must be translated into concepts that females can understand, or you're sunk. Your daily dosis of the women-are-evil-effect in r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 03:56 AM
1

You are dismissing the lived experiences of the men who did got help and the people who work in DV services that helped them, and with your framing of the issue ("feminists are to blame!!") you are creating an enemy more than garnering empathy for the victims.
/r/MensRights01/09/23 07:24 AM
1

I hope you don't ignore reality. It's not good to tell men there's no help for them when it's not true, and then say it's because feminists will threaten them violently. You don't have to like feminism at all to just tell the truth and then try to make things better with trying to garner empathy, which would do a lot of good. But instead your post is just an anti-feminist hate post and will inspire no one to do more to help male victims of DV.
/r/MensRights01/09/23 06:42 AM
0

Nope. It's normal help for abused men. You can ask people who work in DV services, all of them say they encounter male victims (just like the guy I responded to said his aunt helped male victims). It's false to say "there's no help available" when it's so clearly not true (and yes, there can be more), men can get help in these services. Your hostile and confrontantive attitude is very harmful, mostly for the male victims.
/r/MensRights01/09/23 05:37 AM
0

"86.9 percent of the programs that have completed their profiles at DomesticShelters.org say they welcome male victims of domestic violence. (Also important to note, you don’t need to be seeking shelter to reach out to a domestic violence program.)" https://www.domesticshelters.org/articles/ending-domestic-violence/a-guide-for-male-survivors-of-domestic-violence You should mention this and tell men there is help available (and yes, saying there can be more), instead of indulging in senseless rag…
/r/MensRights01/09/23 05:20 AM
0

Thanks for your comment. I think most DV shelters actually do take men (despite men being a small minority of people who go there), it's not just the shelter your aunt started. u/TheTinMenBlog didn't mention it, and instead told lies about supposed oppression of shelters for men. He's more anti-feminist than pro-men.
/r/MensRights01/09/23 02:54 AM
1

No woman should be shamed or even forced to marry a man they don't want. If they don't find a man they want, they should be left alone and not be shamed or forced to lower their standards, period. And I'm sure you're not thinking about the women here, you're clearly thinking about the "lonely men" that would get wives if women would be forced to marry them.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 10:26 PM
0

But if none meet their standards, it is that way, that's what I meant. You don't want to force them to lower their standards, right? If so, this wouldn't benefit the women, clearly this would only benefit the "lonely men" who would get wives, even if these women wouldn't want these men.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 09:35 PM
-1

That's okay, this means they prefer to be single than to be with the men they could be. This is no problem, no one should be shamed or even forced to be with someone they don't want, don't you think?
/r/MensRights24/08/23 09:01 PM
0

It's okay for women to be single, so what's the problem? I hope your argument is not to force women out of college so that they can later date men without degrees ...
/r/MensRights24/08/23 05:17 PM
1

So white men are treated worse than black men in the West? Lol at you.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 02:41 PM
1

Is it also particularly toxic to white men? White men have 3-times higher suicide rates than black men.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 02:34 PM
0

I think many, if not all, of the men who say "No one gives me compliments" also never give compliments to others. It's no wonder they feel underappreciated, they never appreciate others and the others reciprocate this.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 10:55 AM
2

But why do we need to fix it again? "Men" don't need to fix it, it's just that some men would benefit from not seeing all of their self-worth coming from sex, money and social dominance. I think most men (>80%) already do this and have other sources of self-worth (friends, hobbys, career, partner, etc.). It would be good if more men join them and stopped seeing themselves as "losers" because they aren't promiscuous, rich and dark-triad. To appeal whom exactly? To no one. It's about men themselve…
/r/ExRedPill17/07/23 02:46 PM
0

"Sacrificed their own happiness"? That sounds horrible. And you want that back? Why? Why should men sacrifice their own happiness again? Why not choose another life? Are you telling me that men can only choose between sacrificing their own happiness for women, or sacrificing their own happiness with being lonely? I'm a man and I think this view is horrible. Men should have happiness in their lives, we should not say that men can only choose between different sorts of unhappiness.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 03:41 AM
-1

Honestly it does sound like you want to say that the major motivation for men to work is to have a housewife and children depending on them. That's not healthy. You can do what you want, but working should not be only for getting a woman. Considering that your first comment was sneaky about strong, independent women, it comes off as you being frustrated about women not being housewives anymore and men losing meaning.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 09:20 PM
-2

That's fine for you. But with money, you can travel around the world, buy lot of funny stuff, and generally feel like a high achiever. Many men would wan this. Your comment sounded like you think most men only work to get a woman. This is weird, as you don't even need much money to get a woman, but it's also weird considering that most women have no problem with working while being single. Do women have a higher natural drive to work than men? Or why do single men struggle so much to find a moti…
/r/MensRights10/06/23 08:49 PM
-1

What's the point of working a dangerous and demanding job for men who aren't loved and have nothing to protect or provide for? Getting money to finance a great life for yourself and feeling the achievement of having helped to build something? Is that nothing to you? You would only work for a woman?
/r/MensRights10/06/23 07:32 AM
0

This was very honest of you.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 07:22 AM
0

Yet another piece of evidence that women are more attracted to violent men. The vast majority of women are in relationships with kind, good men. You have to be out of your mind to believe that the average man who has a girlfriend/wife is a sociopath, almost ALL are good guys. Your last sentence indicates that you are indeed a "nice guy" like in the cliché.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 12:17 AM
0

Feminists look at men in high political office and think, "They must be using their political power to favor other men over women. Because if I was in their shoes, I would definitely be using my political power to favor other women over men". Women were not allowed to held public office until 1920. This was clearly a way in which the men in power had an in-group bias, meaning they were using their power to favor men over women. And there were plenty of others, women were not allowed to work in l…
/r/MensRights24/05/23 06:40 PM
0

Im telling you-half the conflict in our cities would not exist without women expecting men to act "On their behalf" or the endless abuse women give men that is "normal" and "accepted". Sure bro, men doing violent crime do it for their women, you are so right.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:16 PM
-6

Very funny comment.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:20 AM
0

You only picked up one item out of 10 because it was the most easily attackable AND because you were triggered. Lol, you admit it was easily attackable, thanks. Not triggered, but amused. On top of that you're completely silent about what a solution could be There's no "solution", there is no right to sex for men or women. Try to get a partner, if you do, good, if not, try to be happy with other means. IF OP's will is "helping men" of course. You continue to say it, you want to "help men" by tel…
/r/MensRights25/04/23 10:06 AM
1

Bullying and supporting bullying is an emotional thing, you are an emotional person, I hope you become rational one day.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:37 AM
0

Back in the day there were heroes keeping women's egos in check, they were called bullies Thanks for telling on yourself.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:21 AM
0

Every man has the right to go for a woman he wants, no matter his or her rating, and every woman has a right to go for a man she wants, no matter her or his rating, and they should not be shamed for it. Imagine actually saying women can help men by "not being hypergamous" lol.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:00 AM
0

Don't be hypergamous Lol that's a funny way of saying "don't date men you are attracted to."
/r/MensRights25/04/23 06:39 AM
-2

What's bad about classifying misogyny as a hate crime? And what has this to do with your incel stats? You think women are responsible for misogyny because they don't "give" incels sex?
/r/MensRights09/03/23 03:06 AM
-1

It's very difficult for someone 9 months pregnant to earn a living. How on Earth does that justify not allowing women to provide for themselves? Do you want to justify the enslavement of women because "it's difficult to work when you're pregnant"? And of course it says a lot when you assume that women had to be pregnant all the time throughout all their lives. Apart from the fact that it wouldn't have justified slavery anyway. I guess you don't want to talk about it, as it's very uncomfortable f…
/r/MensRights03/03/23 11:20 PM
-1

So it is actually meant to protect her from having to work for a living. Because they were not allowed to provide for themselves, at least in terms of earning income. They were like slaves. A thing that you just don't mention, I guess it feels uncomfortable to you.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 08:16 AM
1

A loss of income is the single largest predictive factor for a wife wanting to divorce her husband. Where does it say in the study? It doesn't say anything about the reasons for a spouse (man or woman) filing for divorce at all, it just mentions correlations without exploring causation. And nowhere does it say that after a man loses his job, the divorce rate goes up. It just mentions that full-time employed men have lower divorce rates - it doesn't mention if they were full-time employed when th…
/r/MensRights03/03/23 06:12 AM
-2

This sub actively discourages men from showing emotions because "Men don't need to talk, men need solutions." And everyone who is a man knows that it's men who shame other men the most with terms like "pussy", "sissy", "soyboy", "cuck", "beta", "simp."
/r/MensRights28/01/23 09:09 PM
-1

The link doesn't say what you say. Nearly 600 Canadian and American parents were shown images of children between the ages of eight and 12 conveying sadness, anger, or neutral expressions as part of the study. Participants were then told to sort each image into a “pleasant” or “unpleasant” category. “If you were quicker to report the crying boy as ‘unpleasant,’ the idea is you have an implicit bias towards boys showing that emotion,” explained Thomassin. I don't know how you come to the conclusi…
/r/MensRights28/01/23 02:49 AM
-1

Fathers tell their sons not to cry much more often, I don't know how you can come to the conclusion that it's mothers. This is ridiculous. And I mean, do you want to say that men should cry more? I hear in these subs all the time how men are naturally stoic and not as emotional as women and don't need to cry or go to therapy, now that's actually mothers oppressing their sons and men should cry more?
/r/MensRights28/01/23 01:58 AM
0

Wouldn't it be good if we change that and normalize men seeking help and not shaming them for it, instead of saying "Men don't need to talk, men need solutions"?
/r/MensRights28/01/23 01:36 AM
0

Literally this whole sub is talking about problems without offering solutions.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 01:29 AM
0

white fragility Another racist comment, what's the point? I'm actually castizo, but that's beside the point. Why do you have to attack me based on my (supposed) race? Why not just use arguments? I have read your post already, and I know the historic reality of coverture as well as all the bullshit MRA talking points. What you say sounds like "blacks were never oppressed, actually a lot of blacks had slaves too, most whites didn't have the right to vote either, and in the segregation whites and b…
/r/MensRights25/01/23 12:34 AM
-1

That's actually where this myth came from: upper class white women who hated their husbands and had too much free time on their hands Ridiculous, not only are you completely wrong about history, you are also openly sexist and racist, and very gross about it. Disgusting. I'm not a woman and not a feminist by the way, though I guess you can find another way to insult me based on an innate trait I have. Everyone who knows even a little bit about history knows that coverture was women being the lega…
/r/MensRights25/01/23 12:12 AM
-2

Coverture actually put more on the shoulders of the husband than it did the wife because it basically put everything in his name This is what slavery is. Slave owners had the total responsibility for their slaves too, in the U.S. they were legally responsible for feeding, clothing and giving their slaves shelter (see slave codes), and were held legally responsible if the slave did financial damage to another person. It was also legal to rape slaves, just like wives (marital rape). The legal stat…
/r/MensRights24/01/23 06:18 PM
-1

There’s many ways to end inequality in dating that require none of that. Sure. I'm sure of that.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 05:57 AM
0

Okay, so we both can agree that women can demand what they want in dating, looks/finances/personality, whatever, and that they shouldn't be forced to date someone if they don't want it.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 05:49 AM
-3

Indeed, he didn't, and I never accused him of it. I just mentioned that "ending" the inequality in dating is not possible because there's no right to sex.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 05:41 AM
-6

It was 3% in 1960, today it's 30%. So things are changing, it's not true that "society still has this custom." And it's kinda impossible for it to be 50/50 if men and women don't earn the same.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 02:57 AM
-16

You can't end the wage gap without first ending the inequality that exists in the dating world. I don't care about the gender wage gap, so I don't care about "ending it", but holy shit, there is no right to sex, so you can't "end" the inequality in dating either.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 02:41 AM
-7

It wasn't a case of men banning women from things because they thought they were less than them. It was though, wives couldn't work without their husbands' permission under coverture rule, and not own property, own a business, sign contracts, sue someone, nothing, they were treated like slaves. I don't see why this has to be denied, it's more than 100 years ago, no reason to deny it.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 02:37 AM
-10

The problem is society still has this custom Today already 1/3 of American wives out-earn their husbands: https://nypost.com/2021/02/04/only-30-percent-of-us-wives-earn-more-than-their-husbands-data/ Why you ignore that?
/r/MensRights24/01/23 02:31 AM
0

Do women get more often pregnant than men?
/r/MensRights22/01/23 06:13 PM
0

I think killing men is very bad too. So wouldn't it be good for the whole society to prevent incels from becomig violent by doing something against this hate group?
/r/MensRights13/01/23 10:57 AM
1

A woman doesn’t need to be hyper social and low inhib to fuck tons of guys, all she has to do is go up to guys and ask. You have to be hyper social and low inhib as woman to go to strangers and ask for sex. Most women are nervous when a man asks them out for a date, so they won't be confident enough to just ask strangers for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 01:14 PM
1

Most women are capable of fucking tons of guys with zero effort. Gigacope. Most women aren’t hyper social and low inhib. Most women are too scared to meet a man they don’t know and have sex with him. I agree that women who exhibit high degrees of extroversion and confidence fuck more than the average amount of men. Most women are not like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 12:53 PM
0

Guys who fuck large numbers of women are usually way above average in one or many of the areas that important for sexual success. You mean, for example way above average in low-inhibness? People who are low-inhib enough to be very outgoing, ask many women out, don't feel crushed after rejections, etc.? Yes, that's what I mean. Personality matters the most. Either for dominant men who have many FWB or soft men who are in poly/swinger relationships. there would be no epidemic of rising male virgin…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 11:41 AM
1

So first it's about looks, then money can do it too, then social status can do it too, and now a low-inhib personality can do it too. Now wait until you find out that there are short, physically weak guys with friendly personalities who are in poly relationships and regularly fucking different women in swinger clubs. So why not just say it? Personality matters. Or, basically, not being a social shut-in matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 09:29 AM
1

You don’t literally have to be a male model to fuck women bruh. Indeed, being of average looks is enough to fuck tons of women. That was my point. So don’t start with the bluepill copium “outgoing” bullshit. Considering that he actually has 40 kids now, he's definitely very outgoing. There can't be any doubt to that. I bet if he had a job he already wouldn't have enough time to meet so many women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:32 PM
1

Lol yeah, that dude is a Chad as well. Ridiculous. Here are other pics of him, he is not attractive and only gets women who are not attractive either. https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article5432566.ece/ALTERNATES/n310p/PAY-Keith-Macdonald.jpg https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article5432596.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/PAY-Keith-Macdonald.jpg https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/06/08/12/29720BC200000578-0-image-a-38_1433761992056.jpg He would probably get close to zero matches on Tinder. How …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 03:51 PM
1

How many matches do you think he would get on dating apps? Is this unemployed man who has 10 kids with 10 different women a Chad? https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/meet-the-man-who-has-10-children-248565
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 03:37 PM
1

I actually meant not attractive. He definitely isn't a guy who could work as a model, don't pretend otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:12 PM
1

He doesn't have good facial features, he would have been rated very bad on OKCupid and you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:11 PM
0

We can afford to lose way more women than men. So you want to lose all wars so that more women get killed? What point is there in this?
/r/MensRights01/01/23 01:19 PM
1

So women's weaknesses get them a free pass to forcefully dispose of men's lives on women's behalf? No. It's just that the people who started wars wanted to win them, so they chose to draft men and not women, as a female army (or even 50/50 male-female) would have lost the war. Why do you think the Confederates conscripted whites and not blacks? Did the Confederates hate white people?
/r/MensRights01/01/23 01:05 PM
1

shouldn't we have a female-only draft in reparation to all those dead boys forced into their disposable roles as women's and the state's human sacrifices in war? No, because then we would lose all wars.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 12:59 PM
1

What has this to do with my question? Do you think it's okay that women want better educated and more wealthy men than themselves?
/r/MensRights01/01/23 12:57 PM
1

So you think there's actually no problem with women wanting better educated and more wealthy men than themselves? Because you agree that there's no right to a wife?
/r/MensRights01/01/23 12:45 PM
1

If women would be half of the army, Ukraine would lost the war. Men are physically stronger than women and that's important for the military. So there are practical reasons that have nothing to do with oppression of men. There were also practical reasons why the Confederate States conscripted white men for the civil war and not black men, it had nothing to do with racism against whites.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 12:44 PM
1

Yes, there's no right to a husband. Of course not. And there's equally not a right to a wife. Do you disagree?
/r/MensRights01/01/23 12:35 PM
1

Hundreds of thousands of men have already been slaughtered for women's and wealthy men's benefit in Ukraine and Russia. Women benefit from the war in Ukraine? Really? So their lives are better now than before the war? Women still want men better educated and more wealthy than themselves. Where men were expected to marry women far less educated and without any income, women won't do the same for men. Bro, there's no right to a wife. Everyone is allowed to have preferences and to stay single, this…
/r/MensRights01/01/23 12:04 PM
1

In fact, men were socially programmed and conditioned to believe, by women and women's state violence proxy, that as a man, if you didn't provide for and protect women, you weren't worthy, as a man, of love, marriage or affection. Even if this was true (it wasn't), what's wrong about having standards? Men also have standards for women, young, beautiful, good personality are preferred over others. And even if women have higher standards, that's okay too, as it is their preference. There's no "rig…
/r/MensRights01/01/23 12:01 PM
1

Really bad examples. Women don't have affirmative action quotas, not only did it never happen, the Supreme Court ruled against that possiblity. VAWA is not discriminatory against men. What do you have against that? The name of the law? So basically, semantics? WEEA wasn't discriminatory against men and doesn't exist anymore. It's incredible how bad your examples are, you are literally proving all the time that there's no institutional discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 11:41 AM
1

This man is unattractive and poor, yet still has 21 kids: https://www.wvlt.tv/2021/03/16/kpd-asking-for-help-to-find-suspect-in-rape-burglary-investigation/
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 10:27 AM
4

Fantastic comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 10:17 AM
-1

This is flat-out wrong in many places Ridiculous. What I said is not wrong. But I'm not going to barge into a women's forum screaming about the "truth" of the data just to cling to a victimhood monopoly Yes, true. The only thing you will do is go to men's forums and "tell" about the "truth" of the data just to cling to a victimhood parity that doesn't exist. And of course no activism will done to prevent these crimes, it's all just to achieve "parity" and then shut up.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 12:46 PM
-1

A drunken hookup isn't rape, but someone sober sleeping with someone blackout drunk is And under the CDC's definition, a drunken hookup can be called rape. That's the issue. With our current understanding of rape, men and women rape each other at equal rates. That's false in all aspects. First, the CDC studies from 2014, 2015, 2017 already show other numbers (you can't just always look at the 2010-11 study because you like the results), and second, the CDC definition is neither the legal nor the…
/r/MensRights05/12/22 10:29 PM
-1

The CDC definition of "rape" is not "sex without consent", so it contains things that are not rape, and you know it. Yes, feminists were stupid when they included things that were not "sex without consent" as "rape", of course, I agree with you. Yet that's not a reason to use this wrong and stupid definition (just for trolling feminists?), we should use the right one, this is what the TIME article is saying and I agree with it.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 08:53 PM
0

or we need to reexamine the nuance of what we're calling rape altogether and see what conclusion we reach That's exactly what the article did. It says the rape numbers of the CDC are too high (for men and women), and that rapes (violently or when a not incapacitated person had sex with an incapacitated person) are more common against women.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 08:29 PM
0

I read the TIME article. It clearly said that most cases of "made-to-penetrate" are very likely not rape, just drunk sex (and that many women who say in CDC surveys that they were raped had just drunk sex too and were not raped). So the TIME article says that the CDC rape numbers are misleading, because they are too high (for men and women). I don't know what you didn't understand about that. The article was very clear. It's all in the title: "The CDC's rape numbers are misleading".
/r/MensRights05/12/22 08:02 PM
0

Your own link refuted every single point you made. This was ironic, you didn't even notice.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 07:37 PM
-1

Of course it refutes every single point you were trying to make. Men don't get raped as often by women than women by men, this claim is completely false.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 07:05 PM
-1

Your own link said the following: most of us would agree that to equate a victim of violent rape and a man who engages in a drunken sexual act he wouldn’t have chosen when sober is to trivialize a terrible crime. It is safe to assume that the vast majority of the CDC’s male respondents who were “made to penetrate” someone would not call themselves rape victims - and with good reason. But if that’s the case, it is just as misleading to equate a woman’s experience of alcohol-addled sex with the ex…
/r/MensRights05/12/22 02:40 PM
0

How are men a disadvantaged second class? The stats mentioned about suicide, homicides, work deaths and homeless are less than 0.1% of the U.S. population. There are more male millionaries than men who are homeless or die by suicide, homicide or at work every year. It's ridiculous to use these stats to prove "second-class" status, in fact it's worse than the Gender Wage Gap talk.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 02:33 PM
0

Many feminists believe and push patriarchy theory which states the patriarchy oppresses women as a sex What women exactly do you think feminists say are oppressed? They don't say that white, straight, affluent women living in safe areas are oppressed, so which women feminists claim are oppressed? Can you specify it?
/r/MensRights29/11/22 06:32 PM
0

I never claimed all feminists believe all women are oppressed. Okay. I misunderstood what you said here: Claiming women are oppressed is how feminists justify advantaged for women. Maybe you can clarify what you mean. What women do you think feminists say are oppressed? They don't say that white, straight, affluent women living in safe areas are oppressed, so which women feminists claim are oppressed?
/r/MensRights29/11/22 03:36 PM
1

There are many feminist women who are white, straight, financially well-off and live in safe areas and can't stop to talk about how "privileged" they are because of all this. The notion that all feminists believe all women are oppressed is false. Also, do you agree with OP that men are second-class citizens today?
/r/MensRights29/11/22 01:58 PM
-1

Which ones do you want to preserve? Mating and procreating is a no-brainer, something else?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/11/22 10:16 AM
2

As a result gender roles are natural and cannot in essence be unethical. But don't LWMA believe that the traditional male role was to be disposable? Is that not in essence unethical?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/11/22 05:40 AM
1

Imagine not admitting your contradictions and instead doubling down on them.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 11:21 PM
1

Imagine trying to explain your obvious contradictions away like that.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 11:13 PM
0

Imagine first saying belief isn't necessary and then saying it comes with maturity.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 02:20 PM
-2

Imagine believing that.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 03:17 AM
-2

Imagine actually believing that.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 02:18 AM
1

What do you say about this stat: https://www.crimeinamerica.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Screen-Shot-2022-03-19-at-12.17.13-PM.png Care to explain?
/r/MensRights14/11/22 06:07 AM
1

Typical of someone with daddy issues. Comments like this make me ask: Why do MRA always say society should take men's mental health problems more serious, when they make fun of mental health problems among women and even call women mentally ill for fun (as you just said she has daddy issues without haing any idea about her life)?
/r/MensRights14/11/22 01:57 AM
-1

despite the fact men are victims of violent crime more so than women That's not true. In many years, women are more likely to be victims of violent crime, for example 2020. Here are some stats: https://www.crimeinamerica.net/women-have-higher-or-equal-rates-of-violent-criminal-victimization/ society is gynocentric, part if this is caring more about women’s well being. How does society care more about women's well-being? Men get vastly more help in almost anything. Even in college, affirmative ac…
/r/MensRights14/11/22 01:51 AM
-7

Men face more violence than women. This is irrefutable. You're wrong: Women have higher or equal rates of violent criminal victimization: https://www.crimeinamerica.net/women-have-higher-or-equal-rates-of-violent-criminal-victimization/ (Here a screenshot for the data for 2020) Yet feminism prioritizes only the violence against women. Why? Is that fighting for equality? No, its not. If they were for equality they'd be prioritizing violence against men. First, feminism is very clearly and loudly …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/22 09:58 PM
1

it is possible that widespread victim services for men won't have the same effect as they did for women, but we can't know that until that happens There are a lot of services for male DV victims, MRA always say there aren't, but there are many. It's just that men are much less likely to need the in the first place, as most victims of serious injuries of DV are women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/22 12:26 AM
1

Isn't it possible that men are just on statistical average more violent and therefore more likely to kill their partners? Don't you think this is an option?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/22 06:39 PM
1

now, i should say that i believe that a man who kills his female partner is more likely to have done so defensively than a woman who kills her male partner Why do you believe that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/22 04:20 PM
0

Women often complain that men always want to "solve their problems" instead of just being a supportive listener. This is always framed as something that men need to change. But they never seem to consider the reason why men do that in the first place; it's because it's generally what we want when we open up. If you open up to a person, you want to do it only so that the problem is solved? I think this is not true for the vast majority of men. Like for example, if a man opens up that he feels a l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/22 07:20 PM
0

Wait, strict gun laws are effective mental health care?
/r/MensRights30/10/22 02:59 AM
1

They are a disengaged army in waiting, reeady to be mobilised by a charismatic leader or nefarious icon. Hating men so much could end so badly. You're already preemptively blaming women for men following a "charismatic leader" and doing terrible things?
/r/MensRights29/10/22 10:50 PM
0

it's almost exclusively young American men who do mass shooting I wonder why there are so less mass shootings in Germany, Spain or Denmark. What could be the difference to the U.S.?
/r/MensRights29/10/22 10:40 PM
1

Whenever I ask for evidence of a Western patriarchy, the answers are always the same – ‘men are 72% of politicians!’ Or ‘men are 85% of Fortune 500 CEOS!’ Really? I feel like the answers are always the Gender Wage Gap (I know, different life choices) and women being "too sexualized" and denied abortion rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/22 02:22 PM
1

Truth is they don’t have too because it’s private Yeah that's the point. He was slut-shaming feminist women, literally calling them out for liking "rough sex with the most masculine men", like that would be something bad. Everyone can have his own preferences. I don't think anyone would shame a LWMA or MRA if he had sex with feminist women either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/22 11:44 AM
1

Would you feel okay if the word "toxic masculinity" would be changed to "internalized misandry"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/22 06:30 AM
2

So you think feminist women want to be dominated, taken rough, spanked, etc. by masculine men in the bedroom because they don't want to work 80 hours a week, compensate for the incompetence of others, can't receive undermining comments gracefully and don't want to deal with "boys club" politics and not have a work/life balance? That's a remarkable conclusion to say the least.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/22 05:06 PM
1

Which responsibility and accountability do you mean? Can you give examples?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/22 03:55 AM
2

So you think most feminist women do not want to command? As you mentioned that this goes beyond sexual preferences, you think that feminist women actually don't like to command in the outside world either, they want men to do it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/22 03:20 AM
2

Do you think most feminist women unconsciously like the patriarchal authority and want it back?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/22 02:05 AM
3

Of course they’ll claim their sexuality and ideology are entirely unrelated Why do you think otherwise? Why are sexual preferences political?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/22 07:30 PM
1

What level of aggression, in which form, is acceptable? If none, you'll have to explain why. If some then you'll also have to explain what and why. You know that I was talking about stuff like murder, assault, rape and other sorts of physical harm? Do you think a healthy society needs a certain amount of that?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 07:52 PM
1

So let me get this straight: When men use violence against women, it's because mothers abuse boys and mothers should stop it - but when men use violence against men, it's just a part of male nature and not necessary a big problem, so not a reason to care much?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 05:36 PM
1

Okay, and now my follow-up question: How should society handle the violence of men against men? What should society do about that? Are fathers who abuse their boys to blame, and therefore abusive fathers are the problem? See, that was my point, that you didn't answer: Who is responsible for the violence of men against men? And what should we do about it? There is much more violence of men against men, than of men against women. You don't care about it, or do you just don't like to talk about men…
/r/MensRights02/10/22 05:02 PM
1

I think that people are 100% responsible for their actions, but there are occasionally mitigating circumstances, and always explanations for that behaviour. That does sound like you think adults are not always responsible for their behavior. And you literally said that men's violence against women could be stopped if mothers stopped abusing their boys, so you absolutely did blame mothers for the behavior of adult men.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 03:31 PM
1

Of course, no special treatment. But how does that answer my question? I believe adults are fully responsible for their behavior, that means that male killers, rapists and abusers are 100% responsible for their crimes and no one else. Do you agree with that or not?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 03:15 PM
1

I believe adults are fully responsible for their behavior. That means that male killers, rapists and abusers are 100% responsible for their crimes and no one else. What do you think?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 12:42 PM
1

Don't you see any responsibility and accountability in male killers, rapists and abusers? Are their parents to blame for everything?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:47 AM
1

And do you think mothers are sexist because their fathers abused them so much?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:30 AM
1

Is there some place you want to lead me to? Yes. If you "don't know" if violence from men against men is caused by fathers abusing their boys, how do you know that violence from men against women is caused by mothers abusing their boys?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:05 AM
1

I meant violence from men against men. Is that caused by fathers abusing their boys?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:02 AM
1

If you believe that violence against women is primarily caused by mothers abusing their boys, do you also believe that violence against men is primarily caused by fathers abusing their boys?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 01:52 AM
1

Do you think that men are only capable of negative influences? No. Do you think that violence against women is caused by mothers abusing their boys, but violence against men is NOT caused by fathers abusing their boys? How does that make sense?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 01:43 AM
1

You said that violence against women is caused is caused by mothers abusing their boys. How is violence against men then not caused by fathers abusing their boys?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 01:39 AM
1

So are you telling me that men killing men is not caused by fathers having abused their boys?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 01:37 AM
1

I knew it. Fathers hurt boys. We need less fathers, so that the crime rates go down.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 01:32 AM
1

Ah, okay. However, if male violence on women is caused by mothers abusing boys, is male violence on men caused by fathers abusing boys, too? Why would men kill so many men if not because they hate men because their father, a man, abused them?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 01:29 AM
1

Literally, violence against women could stop in a single generation if all women stopped abusing boys entirely. Do you think women abuse boys because the women have been abused by their fathers, so it's all the father's fault?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 01:09 AM
-4

This is not true. The Independent article says there were 20 beds reserved only for men. But there are obviously others reserved for people of both genders who can be accessed by men (and yes, I know many are reserved only for women). The Mankind Initiative mentioned 78 spaces who are open for men, this number is already higher than 20. The fact that 78 spaces exist should be mentioned, it is important.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/22 07:51 AM
1

It was definitely not a feminist movement. The founder was an admiral and some of its members were even explicitly anti-feminist. Admiral Charles Fitzgerald, who was a strong advocate of conscription wanted to increase the number of those enlisting in the armed forces. Therefore he organized on 30 August 1914 a group of thirty women in his home town of Folkestone to hand out white feathers to any men that were not in uniform. Fitzgerald believed using women to shame the men into enlisting would …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/22 01:25 AM
1

You didn't anwer my question. Isn't it possible that most women kill in self-defense, but most men not? In almost every other country in the world, before and after DV shelters came up, most deadly victims of DV were women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/22 12:32 AM
-1

You said abused men cannot go into refuges. That is a false statement. Men have refuges, including for DV. It is important to tell the truth. A space very likely doesn't contain only one bed, so beds and refuges are not comparable (and even then, 78 are more than 1/100 of 3,600). So it's definitely more than 1% help for men. I said women have more refuges, but it's incorrect to say that men have none, and it may harm victims who may think they have nowhere to go even if there is help.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/22 12:23 AM
-5

Men cannot work in refuges, abused men cannot go into refuges They can. Women have more refuges, but there are 78 spaces open for male victims of DV, 20 of them are male-only. http://www.mankind.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Refuges-for-Male-Victims-of-Domestic-Abuse-Briefing-July-2016.pdf
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/22 11:57 PM
2

the drop in the number of men killed by their partners is due to an increase in the amount of services available to women to get themselves and their children out of abusive homes without killing their partner. the implication should hopefully be clear: the exclusion of men from victim resources serves both to have the obvious effect of being shit for men and children stuck with an abusive woman, but also leading to preventable deaths for women. Are you actually saying that large parts of men ar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/22 11:32 PM
1

100 years ago men's life expectancy was more than women's? You're wrong, it wasn't: https://u.demog.berkeley.edu/~andrew/1918/figure2.html Also, the life expectancy has gone up a lot for both. In US prisons the population is about 93% male Was that ever different in the past? And of course, the reason is that men commit more crimes than women. In case you didn't know incarceration en masse is a modern thing. Yeah, and it was because of the drug war. Was the drug war a feminist plan to incarcerat…
/r/MensRights18/09/22 04:05 PM
1

I was talking about the actual numbers. Men are much less likely to die at work today and the draft is abolished in most Western countries. So how are men today more disposable?
/r/MensRights18/09/22 03:49 PM
1

male disposability is increasing How is male disposability increasing? Work deaths are at a record low, the draft has been abolished in most Western countries (it isn't enforced in the U.S. either), men's lives are not more disposable today.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 03:21 PM
1

What do you mean? Women working is bad for the sustainability of the population, or did you mean something else?
/r/MensRights18/09/22 01:32 PM
0

Well the richest countries on Earth right now all have high female workforce participation rates, so women working is definitely nothing bad for the economy.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 12:56 PM
1

There are no gendered custody laws in the U.S.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 03:38 AM
1

What exactly would men say if they were listened to?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/22 02:57 AM
-4

Yes maybe men are more likely to be perpetrators of big crimes against men but those are few and far between. Dude, all the things MRA vent about almost exclusively focus on the bottom 1% of men: "The majority of homicide victims are men, the majority of suicide victims are men, the majority of homeless people are men, the majority of work deaths are men", etc., all of these combined make up less than 1% of men, yet it's almost all what MRA focus about. How can you say these issues are "few and …
/r/MensRights22/08/22 07:21 PM
1

Lol 59% of women voted for Hillary Clinton 2016, but Donald Trump won the election.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/22 10:35 PM
1

Are you really saying that women could "bring the change they want to see in men" if they would date shy guys, nice guys, etc.? What about men not putting their whole self-worth in sexual success and find ways to be happy single if necessary (through friendships, hobbys) and if they want to do somethig about their dating struggle, actually trying to improve themselves (like being less shy)?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/22 10:09 PM
0

Well, 99.9% of men do. Why do they need to be treated like they allbelong to that .1% that don't? How about 100% of women take half of thatresponsibility? It's like saying "Men are half to blame if they get divorce-raped, why do they marry" or "Men are half to blame when they get falsely accused of rape, why do they date women" or "Men are half to blame when they get raped in prison, why do they commit crimes that bring them to prison". Eveything wrong too. The perpetrators are 100% to bame. The…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:08 PM
-4

yes in the mistreated category of women all women blame all men Yes all mistreated women generalize all men That was the generalization I meant. You think all women who were mistreated behave the same. And of course it's wrong. There are women who have been mistreated and don't blame all men. You clearly have a lot of resentment against women.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 10:15 AM
-4

You aren't generalizing all women? Of course you are: Man dont work like that atleast 97% of man. But woman on the other hand are totally different from us. When a woman gets mistreated by man she blames all men they start movements to reduce men to 10% they even abort their male child. They call all men pigs and dogs. You even said "they" (=women) lol. read the whole conversation where i say that every society and category has good and bad people but you ll not find anything where i said one wh…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 09:46 AM
-12

When a woman gets mistreated by man she blames all men they start movements to reduce men to 10% they even abort their male child. They call all men pigs and dogs. You are criticizing women for generalizing all men while you are generalizing all women. How ironic. And no, not all women generalize all men. Both genders do this sometimes, but most people from both genders don't do it, even if they sometimes become resentful. You clearly have a lot of resentment against women and do generalize wome…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 09:19 AM
0

Guess which side is calling racist for anyone using the argument that mass migration causes security and public safety issues even when backed with sources proving that crime is more predominant (percentage wise, obviously) in the migrant population or the countries of their origin? On the male migrant population, to be precise. I think there should be a preference for female refugees (women and girls) coming from war-torn countries, as, like you said, male refugees from countries like Syria and…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 08:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter