KinSundry Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	Woman who pushed husband off a cliff because she regretted her marriage pleads guilty, avoids 1st degree murder charge I love how I can see this in /r/JusticePorn titled "Woman who lied to police now admits to having pushed husband off cliff. Takes guilty plea for second degree murder." And over there it's a good thing. Yet I come here and we're complaining that she isn't being charged enough. It's not like 1st degree murder is a minor crime, and she hasn't been sentenced yet, so maybe we wait for that before jumping on this.	/r/MensRights	13/12/13 02:13 PM
3	You guys want to talk about a REAL issue instead of free condoms? : AdviceAnimals Goddamn, what a prick. Thanks for the link	/r/MensRights	21/11/13 06:10 PM
1	Boys are bullied to suicide all the time, but 2 girls do it and finally the government passes anti-bullying laws Very sadly true	/r/MensRights	21/11/13 03:27 PM
9	Boys are bullied to suicide all the time, but 2 girls do it and finally the government passes anti-bullying laws You raise a solid argument, Louis C.K. must be sith! Although Darth Louis doesn't sound very intimidating to be honest	/r/MensRights	21/11/13 03:26 PM
0	Boys are bullied to suicide all the time, but 2 girls do it and finally the government passes anti-bullying laws I agree, there isn't any one group or individual that is prone to bullying or being bullied. But if we want the world to recognize that women can be physically abusive towards men we have to recognize that men can be emotionally abusive towards women.	/r/MensRights	21/11/13 03:23 PM
-3	Boys are bullied to suicide all the time, but 2 girls do it and finally the government passes anti-bullying laws What the fuck are you complaining about? New laws that protect people? Should there be special punishments for each gender? If you want to talk about Men's Rights please do, but if you're going to rage because a girl's death brought attention to an issue that effects men AND women you can fuck right off. We don't need your kind around here. In the off chance you gave this post a shit title by mistake maybe paint out that a more appropriate title would be something along the lines of "Canadian Go…	/r/MensRights	21/11/13 03:19 PM
-1	Boys are bullied to suicide all the time, but 2 girls do it and finally the government passes anti-bullying laws I cannot even comprehend how you're being downvoted for this. I thought the exact same thing, instead I find an article I've already read and personally find to be completely gender neutral.	/r/MensRights	21/11/13 03:11 PM
0	Boys are bullied to suicide all the time, but 2 girls do it and finally the government passes anti-bullying laws I'd imagine it'd be handled the same. The legislation defines an "intimate image" as one that "depicts a person engaged in explicit sexual activity or that depicts a sexual organ, anal region or breast." That's about as gender neutral as possible.	/r/MensRights	21/11/13 03:05 PM
3	Boys are bullied to suicide all the time, but 2 girls do it and finally the government passes anti-bullying laws There are a plethora of ways the genders in these situations can be reversed. If anything women are significantly harsher to each other than men.	/r/MensRights	21/11/13 03:01 PM
-7	Boys are bullied to suicide all the time, but 2 girls do it and finally the government passes anti-bullying laws Comedian. I'm pretty sure we're all aware men can ruin lives and women can cause physical damage.	/r/MensRights	21/11/13 02:57 PM
3	You guys want to talk about a REAL issue instead of free condoms? : AdviceAnimals I searched that thread and could not find this comment, I don't know if it was higher up before but it sure isn't now. The overwhelming majority of comments are discussing that domestic violence is a gender neutral issue.	/r/MensRights	21/11/13 02:54 PM
2	You guys want to talk about a REAL issue instead of free condoms? : AdviceAnimals I'm impressed with the quality of comments at advice animals, not what I expected.	/r/MensRights	21/11/13 02:45 PM
3	My school's fundraisers are against men. Almost certain OP isn't a mother. Just a female student at the school.	/r/MensRights	10/11/13 05:01 PM
5	Man wins custody of kids: 'It contravenes all human rights. Sammy and Benji are two vulnerable little boys who have a right to their mother in their lives. This woman sounds like a fucking twit and this article could hardly be more biased.	/r/MensRights	08/11/13 02:26 PM
0	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. You know what. We've been at this way to long. Yes people are bad. Yes bad people get away with it sometimes. Did you know the guy who beheaded Tim McLean is essentially already free? And has been for more than a year? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Tim_McLean#Aftermath Stupid shit happens. Sometimes the system fucks up.	/r/MensRights	07/11/13 07:02 AM
1	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. Listen to yourself, you keep denying these things and then instead of admitting it happens, you try and sidestep the subject. Sorry, it's nearly 2am where I am, my arguments are very likely not the greatest. I admit, it is possible for people who don't deserve it to go away from punishment. That does not make it the norm. My incredulity came from the amount of people that seemed to think this was common practice. And I have heard of battered women's defense, I'm just not well versed on it	/r/MensRights	07/11/13 06:47 AM
0	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. You about 30 mins ago - "Link to a story? I find it hard to believe anyone convicted of murder could get away without sentencing." Sorry, I should have specified that I did not mean self-defense. Sure, battered person syndrome most likely has been misused. People going out and murdering for fun aren't very likely to get off. Tell me, when will feminists start targeting women as abusers of men? You know, since they recognise men can be victims too and everything. I like that you choose to lump a …	/r/MensRights	07/11/13 06:37 AM
0	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. Before I even decide whether this is worth continuing, do you consider Battered Person Syndrome to be a legitimate diagnosis?	/r/MensRights	07/11/13 06:17 AM
0	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. Great, it was created for women. And wow, people realized men can be battered as well. That men can suffer abuse as well. This sort of diagnosis was created to rationalize chaotic behavior in relatively average individuals. I'm not sure what you're trying to argue here.	/r/MensRights	07/11/13 06:07 AM
-2	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battered_person_syndrome Most commonly used by women. Doesn't mean men cannot suffer from it.	/r/MensRights	07/11/13 05:36 AM
-1	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. Once again, if you could provide an example of this that would be great, because so far I've heard nothing. I'd be more interested in the cases from Canada because to the best of my knowledge people don't get away with that shit.	/r/MensRights	07/11/13 05:33 AM
-2	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. Link to a story? I find it hard to believe anyone convicted of murder could get away without sentencing. And why is it hard to believe the court system would not keep the 10-12 year old girl being kept in a stable location where she can get the treatment/education/medication she needs? Side note: Insulting me devalues your own opinion.	/r/MensRights	07/11/13 02:10 AM
0	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. Oh man, I totally forgot there is clearly tons of rape and torture in juvie. It doesn't say in the article where he's going. Where do you think he's going? Maximum security prison? Edit: And as a child, all he had to do was whimper abuse and the authorities would have been all over the case. He's not being thrown to the wolves because he's a boy. He's receiving a sentence for murdering his father.	/r/MensRights	06/11/13 10:34 PM
2	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. I couldn't agree more. I'm not exactly sure how things work in America, but what are the chances he'll still receive what he needs after getting out?	/r/MensRights	06/11/13 10:17 PM
1	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. In a more positive light, at least he's in a stable location now. The article mentioned since being in juvie he's been clothed, fed, and has gone from flunking fourth grade, to near finishing seventh. And he now receives the counseling, attention, and medication he needs.	/r/MensRights	06/11/13 09:25 PM
1	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. I was attempting to argue with the bulk of his statement that compared a child murderer to a child victim of statutory rape. Which I happen to feel either demeans the victims of statutory rape by blaming the victim, or absolves murder of wrongdoing. However you are correct, I was unnecessarily aggressive initially.	/r/MensRights	06/11/13 08:33 PM
-3	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. I can imagine a 10-12 girl facing the same sentence here. The boy is in a better situation now than he was in the first place. He has a stable environment, proper education, safety, shelter, and people to help him. In this case the justice system worked to provide what an individual needs, rather than a punishment.	/r/MensRights	06/11/13 07:43 PM
-5	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. Did you read the article? The kid got 40 to life, but will get out between 20 and 23. The sentence is a technicality. Please share an article with me that details a boy tried as an adult in a statutory rape case. Children are tried as children. This child was tried as a child and will serve a child sentence. And please, if you're going to use words like 'pedantic', at least use them in the correct context.	/r/MensRights	06/11/13 07:38 PM
4	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. Why is this a Men's Rights issue? And what specifically is the difference between "men's human rights" and "women's human rights"? Edit: I agree though, this is one of the saddest things I've come across in a long time	/r/MensRights	06/11/13 07:07 PM
4	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. Yes. This kid's story has a lot to do with feminism. I must have missed where they gave full custody to the father. /s	/r/MensRights	06/11/13 07:05 PM
-7	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. Are you seriously comparing a child murdering someone to a child being sexually abused by someone? How is your view of childhood that fucking skewed?	/r/MensRights	06/11/13 07:05 PM
16	An abused 10 year old gets 40 years to life. This ruling is evidence that the state of California views 10 year olds as more responsible for their own actions than wives who allege abuse. After reading the comments here I have two questions. Did anyone else read the article? And, why is this a Men's Rights issue? The kid did NOT get 40 years. The title is misleading. The kid, while I agree is only a kid, would only end up more fucked if he wasn't placed somewhere, does anyone seriously think sending him to his mother/step-mom/grandmother would actually help? The mother is fucked, who knows what's up with the step-mom, and the grandmother admitted she couldn't handle him and was h…	/r/MensRights	06/11/13 07:03 PM
2	Feminist Forces /r/science to Change Its Banner From One With Fair Distribution of Sexes to One Of All Women I'm okay with looking like a crazy asshole, my problem here is that we're looking like crazy ignorant assholes. It makes us no better than the people we'd like to confront.	/r/MensRights	03/11/13 12:40 AM
5	Feminist Forces /r/science to Change Its Banner From One With Fair Distribution of Sexes to One Of All Women Honestly I would love to do the exact same thing, the mod for /r/science has actually changed the banner to Dr. Bunsen Honeydew and Beaker from the Muppets	/r/MensRights	02/11/13 09:02 PM
4	Feminist Forces /r/science to Change Its Banner From One With Fair Distribution of Sexes to One Of All Women To the best of my knowledge this isn't anywhere on /r/science , this is way off topic for their front page	/r/MensRights	02/11/13 08:59 PM
5	Feminist Forces /r/science to Change Its Banner From One With Fair Distribution of Sexes to One Of All Women The original image contained 20 prominent scientists, 3 of which were women. It is now 12 women, probably because the mod of /r/science that does that felt pressured to do so. I agree it's not equal now, but this was ONE woman that wanted it changed. If we all go about blaming the entirety of /r/feminism we just end up looking like a bunch of crazy assholes. Even the OP over at /r/feminism acknowledged her mistake about the 'no women' thing. Sure, a fair bit over there are jubilant that it's all…	/r/MensRights	02/11/13 08:25 PM
13	Feminist Forces /r/science to Change Its Banner From One With Fair Distribution of Sexes to One Of All Women The thread over at /r/feminism is literally full of them. The larger portion of the comments, or at least any comments towards the top, are pointing out that the banner change was unnecessary. /u/nallen , the guy that makes the banner for /r/science showed up there to talk about it as well. The top comment over there points out that the original banner has three women in it.	/r/MensRights	02/11/13 08:09 PM
69	Feminist Forces /r/science to Change Its Banner From One With Fair Distribution of Sexes to One Of All Women This would probably be better seeing as half of this comment thread wants to attack /r/feminism over this. I went there and read the comments, and the solid majority of them believe that the original woman that complained over reacted. The fellow from /r/science showed up there and has the second highest comment on the thread at the moment. If anyone else read the comments, before assuming the entire /r/feminism subreddit was attacking they would realize it's the minority even there up in arms. …	/r/MensRights	02/11/13 07:12 PM
8	Would this commercial make it to air if the roles were reversed? Of course it would, it's an advertisement that plays off gender stereotypes. Man forgets to pay bill, makes up for it with soft cuddle animal, because all women like that right? Flip side, woman spends to much money shopping, makes up for it with sexy lingerie/expensive booze, because all men like that right?	/r/MensRights	30/10/13 06:33 PM
9	Statutory rape is "hilarious" to this future teacher Depends on what you mean by that, if you mean everyone has something in them they must control; then yes. If you mean they are lesser than men because they have something in them that needs controlling; no, fuck off.	/r/MensRights	06/09/13 03:54 PM
14	Statutory rape is "hilarious" to this future teacher Thank you, It's nice to know someone else actually read the entire comment	/r/MensRights	06/09/13 02:50 PM
2	You don't see these in the ladies clothes department. Don't. Go. There. Men DO NOT insult other men in a satirical manner! EVER!	/r/MensRights	19/08/13 05:01 AM
1	You don't see these in the ladies clothes department. I don't know a single women, from my fiancee, to my friends, to my own mother, that does not make jokes about women.	/r/MensRights	19/08/13 05:00 AM
2	You don't see these in the ladies clothes department. Learn to take a fucking joke. Shit like this is why half the people that know of this subreddit consider it a circle-jerk. You're making everyone look bad. And the reason you don't see shirts like this in the ladies department? Women generally don't wear joke shirts. I'm glad to see there's at least a few people in here with sense enough to see a joke when they read it,	/r/MensRights	18/08/13 08:23 PM
17	You don't see these in the ladies clothes department. Finally someone sounding reasonable.	/r/MensRights	18/08/13 08:20 PM