TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KingKnotts Archive

View 0 posts and 341 comments by KingKnotts on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

A quick search suggests she probably got hit with the general statute and him the one for doing so to a financial institution.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 06:41 PM
5

Draft =/= combat roles people got drafted into roles that weren't combat roles all the time. Beyond that there is a very simple alternative ABOLISH THE DRAFT. It's outdated and the punishments for men not registering are extremely harsh.
/r/MensRights13/12/25 05:32 AM
2

Dude you are the one that is struggling with basic comprehension...
/r/MensRights12/12/25 07:10 PM
3

Yes, she has been arrested even
/r/MensRights12/12/25 07:07 PM
8

Iron Man was explicitly made to appeal to girls and was quite a success. #1 character at Marvel in terms of fan mail from girls back in the day even. More recently Nightwing has been used to appeal to female readers etc. You know what these did that made them a success though? They didn't make a point to try to alienate the boys. Nightwing gets some not so subtle things that you can easily not notice but once you do is hard to not see like more of a focus on his ass than is normal for male chara…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 11:01 AM
7

The irony in that studies consistently show women are significantly worse than men at handling pain except thermal pain... And the argument always goes to labor, something the body quite literally builds up massive supplies of one of the strongest pain killers to prepare for... And pretending that it's both their natural pain tolerance, and not grasping what the word "tolerance" means and pretending women wouldn't almost instantly tap out of they could once the pain starts....ya know like the VA…
/r/MensRights01/03/25 03:20 PM
3

Premarital tests in general not specifically ones designed for torture.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 03:11 PM
0

Spousal support is absolutely justified in some circumstances, particularly short term spousal support with someone that was a stay at home spouse left to raise children. The simple reality is there is a big difference between "the partner you encouraged to stop working for years to tend to the family, should be provided for long enough to reasonably find gainful employment" and "you should provide for your former partner for the rest of your life." Spousal support should not be for several year…
/r/MensRights20/02/25 05:38 PM
7

..it doesn't say she was with him for 20 years
/r/MensRights20/02/25 05:28 PM
12

Nobody should be getting spousal supportfor life
/r/MensRights20/02/25 05:26 PM
5

Literally the first sentence... "A Wyoming mother-of-four murdered her three young daughters before turning the gun on herself, leaving one of her daughters fighting for her life in intensive care. She killed 3 of them, 1 is alive.. You literally are not even finishing the sentence. It's not poorly written.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 10:16 AM
5

Because you are not understanding what it said. She SHOT AND KILLED 3 OF THEM, the remaining DAUGHTER she also shot but is still alive...you literally didn't even read the article
/r/MensRights13/02/25 09:17 AM
1

They do by implication. You don't need to say a character is straight of you show them have internal monologue about desiring a woman or multiple women... But never men for example. Batman is straight, he is so straight they literally invented Catwoman to make it explicitly clear "he is straight, he isn't molesting Dick you weirdos." Back when that one crackpot tried arguing stuff like that them sharing a bed.... because Dick had a nightmare like TWO DAYS after his parents died and didn't want t…
/r/MensRights09/02/25 01:57 PM
1

I mean basically every woman I've dated has been quite open to the idea of at least trying a threesome in the context of not being in a relationship.... It's also not even close to a new thing, it's been well documented for over 50 years... A lot of women are bi in their teens, to late twenties.... There is even a lot of psychology and sociology research on the topic to try to address possible reasons for why it legitimately is a phase for many women and has been every time we have studied it, m…
/r/MensRights09/02/25 01:46 PM
1

Characters don't need to explicitly identify as straight... In fact the irony here is as someone that is ace.... We can't even have Holmes who was depicted as ace (or at least on the ace spectrum considered there is literally only ONE woman he shows any interest in and it's not romantic, and commented on by Watson that he doesn't show any interest in them)... Because the same people that care about diversity always make ace characters not be ace. Shatterstar with Marvel was meant to be ace... Im…
/r/MensRights08/02/25 08:44 PM
-2

Tbh no it's because a LOT of women are bi... But you know what they aren't? Willing to overcome the anxiety every boy has had to stomach and actually risk being rejected enough to ask a woman out. My partner years into us being together realized she is bi after she no longer was living with relatives and finally was able to watch porn comfortably instead of reading smut... And was surprised that my reaction basically was "I know... Damn near every woman wants to enjoy a nice pair of tits besides…
/r/MensRights08/02/25 08:39 PM
2

The troll blocked me
/r/MensRights19/12/24 09:25 PM
4

That's literally not true... Not a single state bans abortion. Not even 1. And plan b does in fact prevent pregnancy. You are blatantly lying.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 08:40 PM
3

You are literally lying and intentionally using deceptive language. Yet again, under the law women are not enslaved for their body, only men are. If you are male, the government has the legal authority to force you to die for it. That does not apply to women. Women aren't forced into getting pregnant by the law. Plan B access which prevents pregnancy from even occuring is legal in all 50 states for victims of rape as is abortion access in the early stages of pregnancy. You are willfully lying. I…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 08:30 PM
9

Women aren't enslaved. Every state permits women to get plan b, abortions in the case of rape early in pregnancy, etc. And no women don't have less rights over their body than men do. Per the law, men are to die if the government ever feels it's needed... Women don't have this obligation. Yes, we have no had to actually draft soldiers in years, but from a legal perspective men absolutely have less rights to their body than women. You are a bad faith actor.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 08:11 PM
12

"Child support is the parent's obligation, and I always find it to have perverse ulterior motive to argue against child support." You literally are accusing someone of having a perverse ulterior motive for pointing out male victims of rape (including literal children) have been forced to pay child support....
/r/MensRights19/12/24 08:05 PM
1

Dude if you bothered to read you would realize I haven't said there isn't a bias towards shooting men, but that the implication that men should be under half by simply comparing population size is wrong. You keep arguing about something I haven't claimed. Which was the point of the rhetorical question because you are too stupid to grasp you don't have a gotcha, because again... I was explaining why the "49% of the population" argument is bad.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 10:43 PM
-2

Which is an entirely separate issue. Paternity testing is legal in France when it's over a dispute and you actually intend on splitting. France is unfairly vilified with the way people often criticize it... Because there is a MASSIVE difference between paternity testing is illegal, and PRIVATE paternity testing is illegal. And people often criticize it more harshly than is justified due to the misconception that it means paying for kids that aren't yours AFTER a break up/divorce... Which isn't t…
/r/MensRights18/11/24 08:42 PM
1

It's also not ENTIRELY illegal in France. A judge can order it for things like contested paternity for child support. What is illegal is private testing.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 08:20 PM
1

You are a idiot. What percentage of murderers are male? What percentage of armed robbery is committed by males? The relevant statisticsdo not at all imply men should account for less than half of police shooting victims. You are willfully dishonest. I explained quite clearly that the POPULATION is a bad metric to use exactly because you need to look at interactions. You don't have some gotcha with me by pointing out that men are still overrepresented, I didn't say they aren't I explained why pop…
/r/MensRights18/11/24 08:10 PM
-3

To be fair men should (statistically) be more than 49% of those killed by police, proportionality of the population isn't what's important but percentage of interactions (and type). Lethal force by police is a problem but when you look at interactions in which it's situations in which society feels lethal force is justified (someone attempting to shoot another person for example), it does disproportionately mean men are expected to be shot by police more than 49% of the time, this also applies w…
/r/MensRights18/11/24 04:33 AM
15

I support no draft and abortion rights, as well as criminalizing cosmetic circumcision, and allowing men to opt out of a babies life including child support if they do so while abortion is an option or upon finding out if the mother hid the fact. With a minor caveat of you lose your say in both directions in the case of rape. If you rape someone you can be forced to pay child support or to get an abortion (if the victim wants it). This prevents the issue of sick stuff like molested kids being or…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:40 PM
5

The left sided with Hamas propaganda including using figures given from organizations literally controlled by Hamas that they bragged about knowing the American left would believe... the right sided with Israel... Which is the party that was attacked.... Israel isn't a warmonger, they are the ones actually fighting for survival meanwhile the call made by Palestinians is to make the area Arab and goes back to previous calls for genocide by them...the right siding with Israel isn't siding with sup…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:31 PM
17

"Petty" isn't really a good choice when one group decided that you should die for them.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:27 PM
5

"K, so I am going to walk to the principal's office and inform them that you are clearly committing a title 9 violation because you allow the female students to do more disruptive behavior and only target the boys... Which I have witnesses for and I am sure would be shown when they look at your history of disciplining students." I got a professor fired and essentially black listed over what was in some ways even less than a detention.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 03:37 AM
17

Women commit the most DV that isn't really surprising.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 06:06 AM
1

Men going their own way
/r/MensRights30/07/24 01:28 PM
5

One of them should risk there life... Over her property...
/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:30 PM
1

You made a much longer comment in response to something that was way shorter lol
/r/MensRights08/01/23 06:03 PM
1

1 Feminism is about female empowerment including superiority, this is literally why rad fems were and are still considered feminists. 2 Men are taught not to report such things, because unlike with women the norm for men doing so is being ridiculed and dismissed, the same way when boys are molested by teachers people massively downplay it. Ask any male waiter how handy women can be and how they are essentially made to not put up a fuss over behavior that if the roles were reversed would get peop…
/r/MensRights07/01/23 11:38 AM
3

It is your responsibility to take care of offspring you engaged in an activity knowing could create them... You voluntarily gambled. You consented to the activity you don't get to pretend that you aren't aware it could create a child. To refuse to take care of the child you are responsible makes you a piece of shit. I believe both should have rights over the situation but you don't get to tango and then refuse to take care of your offspring because you have bad taste in partners. Get snipped if …
/r/MensRights16/11/22 08:13 PM
1

It's not the child's fault they are born. You took the risk knowing they could be conceived. The mentality you have is harmful to the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 05:45 PM
-11

That is literally not what he said, he said he hasn't seen her in 3 days and she has been distant in texts but they are still talking and are supposed to see each other tomorrow... He isn't being ghosted, it sucks but she is processing that he enjoyed what he was doing there and he didn't even have it in him to admit it, instead his face and trying to avoid answering it gave it away. There is a reason that most of the vets were understanding of needing time to process it while also being underst…
/r/MensRights09/10/22 03:53 PM
1

Nobody thinks sexist discrimination is a bad thing.... interesting statement there...
/r/MensRights13/09/22 03:24 PM
1

Because fewer women are actually qualified in said fields
/r/MensRights13/09/22 03:22 PM
1

When admitting guilt means saving an innocent person... Ya know the whole better for 10/100 guilty people escape justice than 1 innocent person be punished.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 05:23 AM
1

There is.... The problem is prosecutors don't charge women for it out of fear it will have a chilling effect and because ultimately it would mean women would be less willing to admit they lied later.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 01:52 AM
4

No it gets people sexually victimized and killed
/r/MensRights22/07/22 01:50 AM
4

A small portion of rape allegations are probably false. This is where the 2% figure comes from (conveniently the absolute lowest estimate and by a significant margin). If Jill accuses John of raping her after a party but doesn't realize John left the party early because he had to go to work...it is pretty easy to prove the accusation is false.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 01:40 AM
-5

No, absolutely not. And least not without a major change to the suggestion... Recanting shouldn't be punished if done before being charged for lying about it. It is already illegal to lie on a police report, to provide false and malicious testimony, etc... The people that like aren't charged but I the rarest of cases out of fear of it having a chilling effect on actual cases of rape. However, there is also the reality charging them with a serious crime makes women less willing to admit that they…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 01:37 AM
2

No that is paranoia to the point of irrationality. When you get to the point of not even making eye contact with women you are at the point of dehumanizing them out of fear which makes your life worse and opens you up to different complaints. In reality it is simply much more pragmatic to treat everyone as an acquaintance unless you have an actual rapport with them. The problem is building rapport with people largely involves the fact anyone that starts to do so is taking a risk and thus it is a…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 05:36 AM
4

Talking about your relationships is pretty normal in the work place, and so is physical contact with coworkers. Like any job I worked that had me actually interact with coworkers there is always at least one or two employees that if I saw for the first time that day in the break room got a side hug before we would bullshit, if they did something awesome got a high five, etc. If they recently changed their hair in a major way a quick "nice hair cut/love the new color" etc. ​ The problem is if you…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 05:28 AM
1

Perceived discrimination is not the same as sexual assault. It has repeatedly been shown women perceive equal treatment as discrimination. For example the fact men tend to talk over each other when disagreeing because ape brain says louder = right, however women tend to perceive it as them being talked over due to being a woman. When in reality it is just humans are more primative than they think.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:53 PM
1

Most women know they are pregnant between 5 and 6 weeks, however exercising due diligence would make most people know before 6 weeks... Which is still significantly earlier than most states restrict it and not an actual ban.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:09 PM
2

Acknowledging rights and privileges are separate is not a lack of empathy. Infringing on rights of others in the name of addressing privileges is morally and ethically wrong. Men being drafted is morally and ethically wrong because it violates the most fundamental right anyone has and on top of that it only does so for one sex.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:30 PM
1

The same ability to opt out of parenthood that women have is not a paper abortion, also women don't need to buy menstrual products every month. Fairness is irrelevant to if something is a right or a privilege. Men have the privilege of not needing to go through periods or pregnancies, it isn't a right.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:26 PM
2

Abortion isn't illegal in most states, most states place limitations on it not outright banning it.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:21 PM
7

Women don't have to go through pregnancy... It is actually extremely easy to not have to go through pregnancy...by simply being responsible like an adult. Also rights =/= privileges... What you keep describing is a privilege not a right. You are wanting government intervention with sex based discrimination in the name of benefiting one sec to create equal outcome... That is literally advocating violating rights to address privileges.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:54 AM
17

Men have to register to die, women still have autonomy over their body... If they dont want to be pregnant they can avoid sex, use protection, use the morning after pill, and get an abortion provided the other body hasn't developed beyond a certain point.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:04 AM
17

Not having to go through with a pregnancy isn't a right, and equal rights isn't giving women free menstrual products disproportionately at the expense of men (disproportionately pay taxes)
/r/MensRights06/07/22 12:59 AM
3

You are going to die masturbating?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:06 PM
1

The he became abusive part...
/r/MensRights26/05/22 07:27 PM
7

Even in the US not all sex offenders are publicly listed. I know someone that ended up on the lowest category in my state that basically just amounted to for a few years going to the police station like 1/year and normal probation stuff.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 04:55 PM
-2

Nobody thinks 0 female leaders have started wars, propensity for doing so is what people are talking about and it is dishonest to pretend otherwise. The claim that women leaders don't start wars is wrong but not because 1 example... Unless you have so little social skills that you do not understand what people actually are talking trying to say.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 06:13 PM
-19

Not exactly. Queens were more likely than kings if married and less likely than kings if unmarried. Single queens however were more likely to be attacked and to defend their allies but the least likely group to actually start wars. And in the case of married queens it is more an issue that they often put their husband in charge of the military. The Queen not only ends up less involved in war as a result but their partner now has a hammer. This makes the decision to go to war easier. Meanwhile ki…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 01:11 PM
-5

And Alexander the great did what?
/r/MensRights16/03/22 12:50 PM
9

You think the time that men are being dehumanized and used as fodder is not the time to be concerned... You are right, years ago was. However the second best time is now.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 12:37 AM
19

Look up the death rates with war by sex.... It is absolutely a men's issue. Women and children are casualties, men are the targets.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 12:35 AM
18

Saying most men would want to fight actually makes it worse to be compelling any men to do so. If my fiancee is leaving the country and I want to go with her for her own safety and because she is tiny and frail with medical issues... Me being forced to fight is not going to accomplish anything since I place 0 value on any country that views me as fodder when I have someone that their safety is my concern and I cannot give by being in another country.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 12:33 AM
37

"Do not be angry about people surviving war and the men who value their family enough to fight for them" Last I recall being made into a slave to risk your life without any say is the exact opposite of a choice. It is being forced to die for the crime of being born with a penis.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 12:28 AM
0

...again the wording is IRRELEVANT UNDER THE LAW.... This is a very well established legal principle. This is why if you pick up a copy of your states legal code you will find laws using male pronouns without much effort (mostly because despite it being an issue with most legal guidelines for decades it does slip through sometimes and many old laws used it as a way of saying anyone). It isn't that the laws do not apply to women it is that the laws are made by politicians and worded based on how …
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:31 AM
-2

You mean whoever does not have primary custody is ordered to pay for the care of the child. There is not any contradiction, the rape victim and the baby are both innocent victims.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:01 AM
-2

That is wrong and everyone acknowledges it is wrong, and the money is not for the women, the money is for the children, who are of no fault in any of it.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 11:26 PM
-2

In every state they have the legal right. Gendered language is surprisingly irrelevant with the law for the most part. The real issue is despite the fact lawyers will acknowledge this, it isn't lawyers that you would be dealing with when trying to do so. First there is the paternity issue, maternity is essentially a fact while paternity is not. Then there is the real issue... laws based around the safety of the new born really do not like the idea of Parent A is wanting to get rid of the child t…
/r/MensRights23/02/22 11:08 PM
-1

In all places the father can. The law applies in a sex neutral way even when referring to one sex unless an exception is made which is a high burden to meet. The reality is in 0 states would it be upheld that a father wouldn't be able to do so if the mother is dead for example. The problem is basically anyone that would choose to fight to make the law be applied as it is constitutionally mandated would be vilified and almost certainly have their right to do so anonymously violated since it will …
/r/MensRights23/02/22 10:51 PM
-4

Technically speaking father's and mothers both can use them and either parent can get their child if the other tries to abandon it under safe haven laws. The entire purpose of safe haven laws is about child safety. In practice it is very rarely the case that father's would have a reason to use them.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 08:34 PM
-8

That is 100% undeniably wrong and an EXTREMELY fucked up take. Nobody has the right to make decisions about someone else's sexual autonomy and for very good reasons (such as parents that "consented" to their children with mental disorders or in comas being impregnated because they wanted grandkids). There is no ethical argument for not owing money to a child that you consented in making (known risk from sex) because the other person could have opted out at a later time. You could have opted out …
/r/MensRights23/02/22 08:16 PM
1

Nobody is saying that it should be different for women, it shouldn't happen to either sex. The databases have intended purposes and databases for victims of sex crimes is not intended to be used against the victims. Databases for criminals are intended for that purpose. There is a very real slippery slope you are walking down that leads to them having everyone's DNA to use since it's in medical databases already.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 05:02 PM
-5

Not really, that is more of an issue of the past and with illegal jobs which are a real but minor problem in Japan nowadays. The government actually has addressed the issue very well by making it so they need to approve overtime and limiting how much someone can do. That said time off of work does not mean free time without pressure because there is still cultural expectations of socializing after work and stuff. Japan has addressed the problem while the US is actually one of the most overworked…
/r/MensRights18/02/22 01:23 AM
4

You basically are arguing if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear as an argument against ones right to privacy. The argument you are making is literally why the framers of the Constitution made it a right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. People's rights matter.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 11:06 PM
-20

Rape kits literally should never be used as evidence in any cases except for rape. It is extremely unethical and for very obvious reasons. This isn't a men's rights issue at all.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 02:10 AM
0

Criminals and law abiding citizens all have privacy rights, hers were violated. On top of that the argument that the solution is just don't commit crimes is very much pushing into the reasoning for WHY the constitution addresses searches and seizures. Just like the government has no right to go through your house looking to see of you might be doing anything illegal they have no fucking right going through a database of VICTIMS of crimes looking for potential criminals.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 02:09 AM
-2

That is a VERY fucked up and horrible take. NOBODY should be disincentivized from reporting to the police that they were the victim of a crime especially those that are victims of serious crimes.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 02:03 AM
-1

They also don't prosecute them when they admit to lying because they don't want people afraid to admit to a lie out of fear of prison to lead to people staying in prison that shouldn't be. On top of that nobody is encouraging women to report false rapes.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 02:00 AM
1

No it doesn't at all. Evidence obtained from rape kits ethically should only be used for their intended purpose, to find the rapist. There is no argument for giving them a lesser punishment or anything if they are found through normal means being made and is is blatantly misrepresenting what was said to act like it is. There is no ethical argument for discouraging people from coming forward about being raped because of something unrelated to the rape that involved them.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:56 AM
-8

No they are not, if you have no warrants in your name but robed a store 2 years ago. You will not be arrested for reporting someone robbing you.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 11:20 PM
-7

If you committed a crime and get raped you shouldn't be discouraged from coming forward out of fear of being arrested.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 11:17 PM
-15

Yes but how the government gets evidence very much matters on an ethical level. Any lawyer would tell you using evidence obtained on a way we want people to offer shouldn't be used like that. It's similar to the whole the women lying about being raped should receive harsh sentences comes into... It sounds good in theory until you realize that women that lied are then incentivized to not admit to lying and more men would have their lives ruined.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 11:15 PM
3

Something like 1/5 people cheat, which is pretty high.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 12:19 AM
15

Feminism =/= women's experiences. On top of that women's experiences of discrimination often simply aren't factually accurate. For example the idea its sexist when men interrupt or speak over women... Which conveniently ignores the fact that men and women socialize differently and it is very well documented that men do it to each constantly. Is it rude? Absolutely. However, it is not men being sexist, its just being ape brained at times and that for literally millions of years males have been en…
/r/MensRights19/01/22 04:22 PM
1

What does sex based discrimination towards men (a human rights violation) have to do with men's rights? Dude you are a joke.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 09:25 AM
1

Riiight totally not pointing out that discrimination based on sex is patently illegal.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 09:24 AM
1

They are being discriminated against because they are men, that is not hard to grasp.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 09:23 AM
1

And that someone... Wasn't them. You seem to think that if a black person were to do something wrong all black people being punished is okay.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 12:55 PM
1

Because they are men and they didn't do anything. Ffs by your logic if a black person kills someone we should just arrest all black people.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 12:55 PM
1

No I didn't, read my comments again and look for me calling it fair. I said punishing all students is more justifiable than specifically punishing the boys when it comes to the law. Being a student isn't a protected class, sex is. Now if you are incapable of reading you should probably stop trying to argue with people.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 12:52 PM
1

That isn't what I said at all but nice straw man.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 12:20 AM
1

Most people are pointing out it's absurd to punish the guys and not the girls as well, nobody is advocating punishing the girls but that to only punish the guys I'd blatantly sexist. Legally punishing both is far more justifiable than punishing all guys but none of th girls.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 11:00 PM
1

That subreddit is a joke when it comes to legal advice, it literally boils down to "ask a lawyer" for everything from people that know what they are talking about because people that are qualified know answering the legal question could be considered legal advice and is a no no.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 10:54 PM
1

Regardless of when it is illegal. "Black students can only go to the bathroom between classes." Does this sound like something you think is probably legal?
/r/MensRights09/12/21 10:51 PM
1

You are pretending all the guys should be punished for what one person did and think it's more absurd to punish all students vs blatantly illegal sex based discrimination.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 10:48 PM
2

It is legal is 0 school districts in the US, allowing girls but not boys makes it patently illegal.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 10:46 PM
0

Funny considering it literally says otherwise under exceptions if you read it.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 11:26 PM
0

Schools do enforce it, when lawsuits are made. There are multiple teachers and professors known for suing to get it enforced. Also boys programs tend to get cut because they get a disproportionate amount of the funding. 53% of the student body is female but about 40% of the funding goes towards women's programs. You are mentioning programs that 1 are not sex based 2 are low cost as women's programs. In terms of sports programs at schools there is also still not even close to proportional represe…
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:08 PM
7

Not exactly... It excludes in total or in part religious institutions with religious tenets as reason for discrimination, military academies, and historically single sex schools, etc. It is perfectly legal to have boys or girls only schools that receive funding for example.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:46 PM
10

Title IX does not allow positive discrimination and not once is historically disadvantaged groups ever mentioned. https://www.justice.gov/crt/title-ix-education-amendments-1972 It does not allow positive discrimination against groups due to being historically disadvantaged.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:34 PM
-12

This is patently false, it is enforced both ways. The problem is it is only enforced via litigation and the threat thereof and most people are less passionate about those issues when they involve boys and men.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:24 PM
16

No, feminism is about female empowerment it is not and has never been about equality for both sexes. Workers feminists opposed the ERA specifically because it would remove special privileges for women in the work place, feminists supported drafting men, etc. Feminism is not about gender equality, you can make that claim when they tackle issues like homelessness and its disproportionate impact on men, that men are given harsher prison sentences than women, etc.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 11:27 PM
11

1 Who here is trashing women? 2 Acknowledging men are physically superior is not trashing women. 3 You seem to think women reproduce asexually, a reminder you would not be alive if not for a man. 4 Someone birthing you doesn't make you owe them anything, nobody asks to be born and plenty of pieces of shit have had kids.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 11:24 PM
-2

Sex work objectively should be illegal, legalizing sex work is linked to increased human trafficking because the demand is significantly higher than the supply that would legally exist as well as the fact it makes minors engaged in sex work seen as less of an issue. Idealistically sex work would be legalized because the reasons it is illegal are inaccurate. However, there is legitimate harm caused by legalization because it legitimizes the practice leading to higher demand and thus more traffick…
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:54 PM
2

Saying it's what the person considers it without knowing what was said is dishonest. When examples of being called subhuman are included you are being a piece of shit for pretending it isn't. "Women are subhuman" is blatantly misogynistic to the point one would expect it to be incel satire. The MRA movement is harmed by people supporting and ignoring blatant bigotry by those that happen to have a shared interest in the movement. It's similar to the problem with mgtow... Instead of focusing on th…
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:48 PM
2

I mean I made r/logicalracism as a joke (racism against triathlons is justified)... There is nothing inherently wrong with subs simply due to their name, to dismiss the possibility of the reason being humor is dishonest and the same type of bullshit used to argue a comedian was actually dog whistling to neo Nazis because he made his dog respond to Nazi lines.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:37 PM
11

Ah yes... the competition of not wanting to be viewed as a sex object and people like you saying treating one sex like a sex object is fine and they shouldn't complain about not wanting to be viewed that way
/r/MensRights16/10/21 06:08 PM
1

Which is irrelevant for what the punishment should be when someone ACTUALLY does do so.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 05:20 PM
2

That isn't how the law works at all...
/r/MensRights13/09/21 05:20 AM
1

"to appease the noisy bitch"...wtf is wrong with you.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 05:11 AM
1

Evidently you didn't read the linked thread...
/r/MensRights13/09/21 05:09 AM
1

It isn't twisting it at all. 15-17 is practically an adult. And yes suspensions are viewed as holidays to a lot of teenagers. My sister was suspended almost every month for example simply because the fact she wanted to not have to go to school.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 05:06 AM
1

At 5 I knew not to touch someone without their permission... At no point did I end up touching someone sexually without their permission. This is not an issue that self control is hard.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 05:04 AM
1

Ah yes... It is so hard to not sexually touch someone against their will... It is not at all comparable to a minefield it is VERY easy to not touch someone sexually without consent.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 05:03 AM
-2

Touching someone sexually without their consent should not have no punishment for either sex. It is normalizing the exact type of behavior that leads to women believing that they can force men to have sex with them.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 06:04 PM
0

Ah yes, you touched someone sexually without consent as someone that is almost an adult... Here is a vacation and a talking to.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 06:02 PM
1

At 15-17 you know better. If you touch someone sexually against their will expulsion is a slap on the wrist and charges are absolutely justified. It isn't misandry to treat crimes like crimes. There isn't consistency with enforcing it, however allowing such things without serious punishment is why there are so many women that think they can force guys into having sex. It shouldn't be dismissed when guys or girls do it.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 06:01 PM
2

15-17
/r/MensRights12/09/21 05:57 PM
1

At 15+ he knows better. He should be expelled and face charges if the woman wants them filed. This isn't grade school or even middle school, these are high school students. Touching another person sexually against their will should carry a serious punishment.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 05:56 PM
0

Nobody is attacking women by acknowledging feminism is pro women not pro equality leading to systemic discrimination against men in the name of feminism. For example the war on education is blatantly anti male claiming it is sexist if women do not do at least as well as men, but are fine with men doing worse. Leading to changes experts have said are bad for boys being made.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 09:22 PM
2

The fact they have a pro feminism rule makes it a problem. When you are not able to criticize the ideology that is used to discriminate against men you are not a place to actually do anything about men's issues.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 04:53 PM
2

The fact you are attacking and mischaracterizing people that oppose sexist discrimination and acknowledge issues men face like higher homelessness, being the sex sent to die in every dangerous situation, mental health discrimination, etc speaks volumes of your idea of equality.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 04:28 AM
2

The flaw is it is technically compatible. Definition 1 is gender equality, definition 2 is female empowerment. Wanting women to have special treatment and benefits is under definition 2. Wanting women to be treated as equals to men is under definition 1. However... If you oppose definition 2 you will be labeled as opposing definition 1.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 04:24 AM
9

Feminism is never and has never been solely a view of equal rights. In fact radical feminism dominates the modern feminist movement, which does reject the idea of equality in favor of female empowerment. This is why they consider women being homeless a problem but not men, why they push the idea the education system is sexist against women when it is objectively sexist in favor of women and against men, etc. This is not even addressing the fact that multiple types of feminists such as Workers fe…
/r/MensRights14/07/21 04:20 AM
9

You see by including women AND children we end up with more than men are impacted...
/r/MensRights11/07/21 02:46 PM
2

Legalizing sex work increases human trafficking... Legalizing while on the surface should be done it actually would lead to more human sex trafficking... For anyone wondering why I will just link a thread...https://www.reddit.com/r/UnpopularFacts/comments/nv3b0t/legalizing_sex_work_increase_human_traffic/
/r/MensRights11/07/21 06:08 AM
1

The fact you feel the need to resort to ad hom and cannot debunk it shows your own intellectual weakness.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 04:09 AM
0

Confirmation bias... In a list of every ruler in that period of time... I don't think you understand how confirmation bias works.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 03:27 AM
1

Unmarried female rulers caused less wars than male rulers who caused less than married women.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 03:25 AM
-4

It's literally from the paper people always reference when arguing female rulers cause more wars, despite misstating what was actually found. PDF warning https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w23337/w23337.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjNrKuJktbxAhXNyp4KHWdFAhQQFjABegQIFRAC&usg=AOvVaw2_1rhz1OvKZ9S9bGNCzfqT&cshid=1625839300282
/r/MensRights09/07/21 01:57 PM
-3

Here is the PDF of the study... https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w23337/w23337.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjNrKuJktbxAhXNyp4KHWdFAhQQFjABegQIFRAC&usg=AOvVaw2_1rhz1OvKZ9S9bGNCzfqT&cshid=1625839300282 It's pretty well known of an analysis of wars based on rulers and marital status and what people constantly misrepresent when arguing female rulers being more war hungry and stuff.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 01:56 PM
-10

I'm just going to point out unmarried women were the least likely rulers to actually start wars... Married female rulers were also historically significantly more effective than male rulers when it came to war because they had a better division of labor. If you average out actually starting war between married and unmarried men are more prone to actually starting war (though women are attacked more and more likely to defend allies so don't necessarily lead to less involvement in war). Specifical…
/r/MensRights09/07/21 06:25 AM
4

Sounds like either you had a shitty lawyer or made the mistake of not having a lawyer. Any good lawyer would have immediately objected and even if the judge still decided that appealed it. "Your honor my client has video evidence of her repeatedly and clearly assaulting him as well as a documented police report." Even if they won't allow the video directly the police report would be an easy way to get the content of the video in.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 09:51 PM
9

There is no source of it actually happening in the post.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 02:01 PM
8

You provide no source and a quick search doesn't show anything so I suspect this is made upbullshit but.... assuming it is at least rooted in something true this is likely simply due to norms of family court having people do underhanded shit as the norm and Ohio Revised Code 2933.52 The court does not want to encourage secret recordings. Judges largely set their own rules, so it would be possible a new judge just didn't have much experience with hidden recordings coming up and made a rule after …
/r/MensRights29/06/21 12:54 PM
13

Not really because women are generally believed, because judges at the end of the day are human and we are biased towards women.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 12:40 PM
2

Their hate policy only applies to minorities. Despite backing down on the wording due to blowback they have repeatedly said as much when anti male and anti white subs have been reported.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 02:38 AM
1

They had to work =/= they had to work any specific job. At the end of the day women were choosing to do the dangerous jobs during wartimes because they were paying more. It was a choice. Have a nice life.
/r/MensRights19/06/21 03:36 AM
1

I have, because my family went through both sides. Women were forced to do the work men were already doing and being told they couldn't do combat positions. Women that wanted to serve could serve non combat roles. You cannot convince m women didn't have it easier because they objectively had it far easier. They had to worry about family members dying... The men had to worry about dying themselves and how their family would survive. The men were far more likely to die doing the jobs forced onto t…
/r/MensRights18/06/21 05:01 PM
2

Actually that is not true and a blatant misrepresentation of what studies have shown. Female rulers while involved in significantly more wars did not start more wars. They were more likely to be attacked and to get involved in wars defending their allies. The difference in terms of starting wars is not nearly as extreme, and while married queens were significantly more likely to start wars, they also tended to have their spouse or closely related male relatives as the military leader, and delega…
/r/MensRights18/06/21 07:34 AM
1

Women literally opposed being drafted and even now there are plenty of feminists that have opposed treating women as equals with the military, because at the end of the day they don't want to have to potentially make the same sacrifice they are okay with men being forced to make... and lets not forget it is extremely well documented that women harassed boys and veterans for being cowards by not fighting because everyone that was seen as a man was viewed as having the duty to be fighting to the p…
/r/MensRights18/06/21 07:19 AM
6

We're you aware that boys were taught not to hit girls even in self defense? If so you were taught you could do so
/r/MensRights13/06/21 03:08 AM
6

Women grade discriminate against boys but male teachers don't. Similar we know that female teachers are more prone to removing boys from the learning environment than male teachers are. Nobody is saying everything is due to women being teachers... However, if you think education is important women being teachers at such high rates especially during the formative years which male teachers are viewed as pedophiles is part of the problem.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 03:27 PM
10

How about for starters that women are taught they can attack men and that men cannot defend themselves in such cases, and that men are taught not to defend themselves. There are multiple videos that have went viral demonstrating this. Girl(s) attack a guy, hitting him multiple times, he swings back one time... "You can't hit them they're a girl". Women commit far more domestic abuse, and often are initiators in reciprocal abuse. The fact that when the man hits back she is more likely to be serio…
/r/MensRights12/06/21 03:21 PM
12

You haven't clue what you are talking about. Men are the sex that is sent to die, makes up the majority of the homeless, given harsher prison sentences, actively discriminated against with education, etc. Girls are taught they are a princess from birth, that boys cannot even hit them in defense, etc.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 03:10 PM
5

You would be very wrong then, male suicide is not predominantly LGBT men. In part because the LGBT is virtually non existent (less than 5% of the general population identify as LGBT mostly youth and disproportionately women). Intentionally or not you are minimizing a problem men face by arguing that it is probably just one segment that ideologically you view as oppressed. Oh also with the willingness to seek help. The VAST majority of men that attempt suicide repeatedly try to get help. The prob…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 09:51 PM
3

You can't sue for someone else. Fun fact, the same reason you cannot do this prevents a lot of unconstitutional laws from being challenged.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 02:14 AM
0

You can wear virtually any with the right type of gas mask or using a shit ton of vaseline. A bardas will accommodate virtually any beard for example because it was designed to do so. A general rule is no beards that interfere with the mask you are to use. The military has considered allowing facial hair again because we know how to factor it in with design as many major countries do and which styles of beard are fine with which designs. The type of mask used dictates which beards are fine, for …
/r/MensRights06/02/21 10:02 PM
5

They are an abomination but they are beards...
/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:55 PM
3

What a coincidence though... That every form of gas mask used by a major country does work with a limited amount of beards. The problem lies entirely with the choice and mask, with masks being made to allow for more common beards in some countries.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:52 PM
5

You can have one with a respirator actually. You cannot have one that interferes with it, which the majority of popular Western beards do. The reason they say you can't has to do with the fact clarifying which do and which don't is far more work than saying not to do so to begin with.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:36 PM
5

There are a handful, the CDC even had a decent list of what you can and what you cannot wear with masks. Beards are more likely to be a problem than mustaches, but basically every beard that is small and close to the mouth is fine. Beards that are centered around the chin are where it is a problem unless you want a bardas as your mask. Bardas just arent something the US really has a demand for currently. They have had very little use in the US, they were used a bit when we accommodated beards mo…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 04:51 PM
5

False, because the implication is all. Especially when used in response to someone pointing out it is only a problem for some beards to begin with which for it to be wrong would require it be a problem for a beards. This is similar to if someone says snakes are poisonous and someone corrects them by pointing out they mean venomous (both are implicitly talking about venomous snakes) , and you respond by saying garter snakes are poisonous so they are right.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 03:41 PM
21

No, they do not. SOME beards do. It is 100 dependant on the length and type of beard. For example it is physically impossible for a soul patch to do so.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 03:07 PM
53

Beards are zero issues. You might not be aware but we already have ones that deal with it due to Sikhs being required to have one. A beard doesn't prevent properly wearing a gas mask. The length and type of beard can but they have regulations to address that for them. Allowing all men to have beards within those standards isn't a problem. Nobody is going to have any issues because they have a soul patch something that isn't permitted not for legitimate concerns but rather because beards aren't a…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 02:48 PM
3

They are right... But only because it's considered childish for men to actually care about their self. God forbid that some men actually value happiness over money for example. Let's be honest here if you have to pick between a 60 hour a week job making 100k a year or a 40 hour week making 60k while it works out to a bit less an hour it also means giving up time to spend caring about your mental well being and bettering yourself. It isn't childish to not chase money at the expense of your own we…
/r/MensRights05/02/21 10:01 PM
4

No, no they don't. In fact the response from quite a few feminists over possibly drafting women was after every inequality facing women is addressed we can talk about it.
/r/MensRights02/02/21 11:30 PM
17

That is not a justification. Even if it is only men 20% of the time... men are disproportionately imprisoned and there is no argument for not allowing it for men at all. On top of that discrimination based on a protected characteristic...
/r/MensRights23/01/21 05:08 PM
2

Just an FYI while that is likely the case at least a portion of the time "crib death" is SIDS as well, and they made boxes to prevent that from happening back in the day before cribs were a thing to allow the baby to nurse but not for the mom to roll over the baby, babies still suddenly died.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 07:51 AM
3

I prefer the tattoo analogy. Do you think if a parent wants to they should be able to tattoo anything they want onto their kid? Everyone acknowledges it is a permanent decision and should be made by the child just like mutilating their genitals is.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 07:36 AM
9

No they wouldn't. You have 0 clue what you are talking about, they have a strong correlative link suggesting a small portion of SIDS cases may be at least in part due to circumcision. Smoking causes lung cancer. Everyone with lung cancer does not smoke. Everyone that smokes does not develop lung cancer.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 12:29 AM
6

It is not mindless speculation, and proving a causative link requires excluding every other possible factor. It is not statistically significant to prove causation but is enough to suggest it is very likely at least a contributing factor. How about you stop being a propagandist troll.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 12:18 AM
6

Babies that are circumcised DISPROPORTIONATELY die from SIDS. Nobody is saying SIDS only happens due to circumcision, in fact what they suggest is that it likely is a contributing factor. Much like how not everyone that has lung cancer smokes, and not everyone that smokes gets lung cancer. You have 0 scientific literacy.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 11:52 PM
5

They have shown a statistical link between a part of the male body with the most nerve endings by far being removed and SIDS. That is literally WHAT THE ARTICLE SHOWS. On top of that you do not under stand what SIDS is at all if you think it instantly kills someone. You are blatantly delusional and uninformed.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 11:31 PM
5

You are delusional.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 11:17 PM
10

I think slavery is wrong, I think genocide is wrong, I think molesting children is wrong. This might surprise you but a lot of people would get "bent out of shape" by people saying that they just have a different opinion on such topics. You might not think removing an important part of someone's genitals from them is mutilation, however you are wrong. On top of that the vast majority of people do not support the idea it is okay to mutilate babies. There is a reason outside of America circumcisio…
/r/MensRights13/12/20 10:47 PM
12

It makes them experience less pleasure while doing so. Remember, it also got popular in the US due to the same guy that said cereal would make boys not masturbate.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 10:29 PM
8

You are supporting cosmetic mutilation of newborns, claiming scientists do not know what they are talking about and that you know for sure that they are wrong. That isn't being open minded, it is being close minded while claiming you are being open minded because you know your argument has no merits.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 10:18 PM
7

In certain countries yes, not around the globe, and SIDS happens during the first 48 hours in some cases, beyond that it happened all the time before babies were frequently vaccinated. You have zero clue what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 10:15 PM
14

The underlying reason for circumcision in the US is literally to stop boys from masturbating. On top of that it does impact the physical and mental health for many people.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 09:35 PM
12

The mutilation of baby boys absolutely is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 09:28 PM
11

Got it the anti vaxxer blames vaccines... for a cause of death that occurs before any vaccines are given. On top of that historically circumcision definitely caused plenty of deaths due to infections. It wasn't an important thing to document because infant mortality rates were EXTREMELY high (and in the past there were some merits for circumcision due to the fact cleaning the area frequently was not always possible). Beyond that their understanding of physiology was quite horrible, such as extre…
/r/MensRights13/12/20 09:26 PM
21

It should not be the parent's choice to mutilate a child. Also science disagrees with your claim.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 06:20 PM
2

Funny because the husband was suspended for pushing him over it happening, as well as his swimming naked around the female agents, and he has had dozens of complaints about his touching women over the years. Funny how damn near all of Trumps accusers shut up once he was elected, and multiple recanted and had their own friends and family say they were lying. Also fuck off with the BS snowflake comment, you have claimed to be an indentured servant because you need to work for a living.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 10:26 PM
-1

McCain was labeled a racist when he ran against Obama. Romney was made fun of over his religion when he ran against Obama. Trump was labeled a Nazi when he ran against Clinton, and for the past 4 years because he won. This is despite condemning white supremacists repeatedly and having several Jews in his family, and winning the Ultra Orthodox Jewish vote. Do you really want to make the argument that it is fair? Obama defended drone striking a kid by blaming Bush and is directly responsible for a…
/r/MensRights13/11/20 04:57 PM
7

Obama is a massive piece of shit that in response to it being discovered he ordered a kid to be killed... blamed Bush for giving him the power to do so at his discretion. Omar is an anti-Semite and so is Blasio. Biden never saw a war he didn't like, and touched a secret service member's wife inappropriately as well as sexually harassed the female agents. It is about politics. If Obama was a republican the same people that idolize him would call him a child killer. FFS it took Romney being the so…
/r/MensRights13/11/20 04:41 PM
1

It is legitimate, you being too stupid to recognize the difference between a legitimate system of government and one that is illegitimate does not make the government illegitimate. When the stance of the government is the people have no right to know what you plan to do on what is an extremely major issue, you are working towards an illegitimate government that does not believe it is accountable to the people. A reminder, Trump for all his flaws is a populist, he cares too much about what people…
/r/MensRights01/11/20 06:42 PM
1

Biden said the people do not have the right to know if he will pack the court, and politicians on the left are demanding to do so. Trump is an idiot, however it isn't the right that is trying to destroy the democracy of the country and the legitimacy of the legal system.
/r/MensRights01/11/20 12:23 AM
1

It was not between full and part time it only compared full time earnings and was explicitly not for the same work. Career choice was an acknowledged factor thy couldn't account for due to the information they had available. The actual findings never were about for the same work, is it is stated it is done to argue for example that female managers are paid nearly a quarter less for being women.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 07:15 AM
2

It is NOT statistically true how it is often stated. They key thing that makes it not true is the part often added that it is for the same work.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 06:40 AM
2

The vast majority of women are not feminist either.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 03:44 AM
2

Let me try rephrasing this because we largely are disagreeing over one thing. You said "[focusing] on the imbeciles only gives the imbeciles power..." Have you considered that the OPPOSITE might be true? Some of the most harmful practices that are now normalized were put into place because there wasn't enough attention paid towards those that were pushing for change that would harm one sex to help the other. If more attention was paid to Ellen Pence and those working with her the Duluth Model ne…
/r/MensRights27/09/20 09:45 PM
2

Try finding MRAs with actual power saying and doing the asinine shit. It isn't MRAs that are getting laws made that discriminate against one sex, it isn't MRAs establishing sexist policies, etc. To fight a problem you need to acknowledge it. The Duluth Model is not going to go away without people acknowledging it is not based on facts but sexist feminist ideology. I am not saying all of feminism is sexist, the ideology responsible for it was however a sexist feminist one even according to the pe…
/r/MensRights27/09/20 08:39 PM
1

I would say the post is a justified critique of the movement in the modern day. The first one dismissed the concerns and attacked the person for being a man and mentioning that our issues are dismissed while saying nobody would do as much, only for another feminist to jump in and in fact not just brush it off but say they deserved it. It was not saying that all feminists are bad but pointing out that a vocal portion are dismissive of the issues of men. It is also VERY similar to the reactions ma…
/r/MensRights27/09/20 07:50 PM
2

I didn't see your second comment yet lol My point is pretending they aren't feminists because they aren't for gender equality only further empowers the sexist forms of feminism which have already caused a lot of harm because they are shielded from critique.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 07:27 PM
2

The thing is when critique of the sexist forms of feminism is dismissed it shields the sexist ideologies. Those that hold the sexist view will gladly use the first definition when attacked to make those attacking them out to be sexist and those that believe in gender egalitarianism will largely blindly follow. Saying they are not feminists not only is a no true Scotsman fallacy but only aids them.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 07:23 PM
2

It rarely is stated as pushing men down, it is INDIFFERENCE to the fact it harms men in most cases. Take the education example. Have you ever wondered why boys doing better than girls in math is treated as being due to sexism but that girls do better in English is not? Have you ever wondered why politicians constantly talk about making education better for girls specifically but NEVER for boys despite the fact it is boys that do worse? Also try bringing up the SCUM Manifesto to a group of femini…
/r/MensRights27/09/20 07:15 PM
4

The thing is it IS feminism. One of the things people that identify as feminists do not get is there are TWO definitions of feminism. 1 Is essentially gender egalitarianism. 2 Female empowerment, the key thing about this one is it is NOT for the purpose of definition 1 but also includes the blatantly sexist forms of feminism. Examples of the 2nd definition is workers feminism and radical feminism. Workers feminists opposed the Equal Rights Amendment because they would lose special treatment in t…
/r/MensRights27/09/20 06:17 PM
3

While I acknowledge the punctuation is bad, I would like to point out you do not know what my age is.
/r/MensRights16/09/20 08:12 PM
7

I was going to say this really seems like shitty taste on your end. I have had one ex do anything pushing into the abuse category and it was obliviousness on her part not something intentional. I know plenty of men that have never been abused because they don't initiate and instead weed out the rare crazy woman that initiates. The worst I had in terms of intentional behavior is an ex that was jealous of my best friend (female) that is now my fiancee and shortly before I broke up with said ex sta…
/r/MensRights16/09/20 07:42 PM
1

"WOMEM"
/r/MensRights04/09/20 01:04 AM
5

Honestly most "small" tits are not very small. The people with the insecurity about it often have Cs or large Bs. While while smaller than average are perfectly normal.
/r/MensRights29/08/20 05:21 AM
-6

They started with the small beasts example, hair plugs does fix being bald. While they are not without their faults in trying to correct them they can be corrected. One of the faults in trying to correct them is that unless you do so via a high quality method it is obvious that the physical trait is an insecurity.
/r/MensRights29/08/20 03:43 AM
-4

I agree about the reasons not to do so, however it is an insecurity that can be "fixed". Hell at the end of the day one can get big tits easily without surgery... It just would be a horrible choice to do so (fat will go everywhere). There are things one should accept about their self and should not be shamed for that can be "fixed".
/r/MensRights29/08/20 03:40 AM
12

Women can fix small tits.
/r/MensRights29/08/20 02:17 AM
0

You are an idiot talking out of your ass. Being married or not is not the problem at all. You are needing to include broken homes just to get that conclusion. The reality is being married is just signing a few expensive pieces of paper. For fucks sake kids wouldn't even know unless their parents tell them.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 01:28 AM
2

Long story short much like with Hitler the part they initially occupied tended to have the view they are/want to be part of said county. The problem is neither stopped with said part or tried the proper diplomatic route.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 01:23 AM
2

I am not familiar with their sentencing guidelines but the US is abnormally harsh in how long we sentence people compared to many majority white countries. Even in the US it can be a very light sentence depending on factors sometimes being just probation. There is a documented history of abuse which made the fear objectively justified. Due to the history of being abused including by him she has subjective reason to be afraid for their safety. She is likely a first time offender. There is also th…
/r/MensRights07/08/20 01:47 PM
-7

He wasn't murdered, he was killed. The two are not the same thing. Regardless of thee sex of the offender or the victim it is not murder in this case, murder is not applicable when someone acts out of fear for the safety of their self or others. Manslaughter is applicable however since the intent requirement is much lower.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 01:28 PM
1

She was not found to be acting in self defense. She was not guilty of murder under the law because her actions were not due to a depraved indifference to the value of human life. If you kill someone out of FEAR for your safety or the safety of others you are not guilty of murder, but it is also not (necessarily) self defense.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 01:23 PM
2

Murder requires a depraved indifference to human life. Acting out of fear for your safety or the safety of others is not murder under the law.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 01:18 PM
7

So female nurses are more entitled to help than male nurses to you despite the male nurses being more likely to die from it... That is an interesting take. Also just an FYI it is not raising the minimum wage for just women, it is doing so for both sexes based on what a single mother needs to earn.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 08:17 PM
7

You know that when most people refer to the witch trials they are referring to the Salem witch trials, right? Which is why I didn't point out that a very large portion globally were men. https://www.newstatesman.com/2018/11/quarter-people-executed-witchcraft-were-men-and-other-surprising-facts
/r/MensRights02/08/20 11:52 AM
11

You do realize men were killed in the witch trials right? Of the 25 killed 6 were men, on top of that they were over 325 years ago.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 09:17 AM
2

Most feminists you meet in life are TERFs at least to some degree. At the end of the day the vast majority of people do not think trans people are the sex they identify as, they think you are a dick if you do not call them their preferred pronoun because it creates unnecessary conflict. They are not going to pretend giving birth is something men can do. This is similar to the LGBT view on basically every sexuality but their own. They do share some issues, however they are not all for the same re…
/r/MensRights01/08/20 05:07 PM
1

For what it is worth you can almost certainly get a cancer screening covered before your age insurance requires if you are at high risk and have a doctor saying it is necessary. That said you would likely only be covered for the type of cancer he had.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 04:53 PM
6

No True Scotsman.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 09:14 PM
3

I have said it before and I will say it again. If you are not okay with listening and trying to empathize when someone talks to you about things like being molested, attempted suicide, and other deeply troubling issues how fucking dare you complain about them not opening up because it is way harder to open up about these things than it is to listen. You do not know what problems someone else has faced in life. When women say they want men to be open about their emotions they do not mean it the v…
/r/MensRights13/07/20 02:57 AM
5

Both sexes disproportionately primarily are friends with their own sex and friends of the opposite sex are largely due to attraction when it comes to men due to evolutionary reasons. There is a reason young women will bitch to MALE friends about how all guys are assholes and then get pissed off if called out for insulting the person when the truth is simply THEY choose to date assholes. Beyond that it is safe to say you are probably a woman and do not understand how male brains work. The sexes d…
/r/MensRights13/07/20 01:55 AM
10

Fuck off. Most off the homeless are men, domestic violence against men leads to men being arrested due to an ideologically based theory that the male is always the aggressor that the woman responsible for spoke against later in life admitting it was based on ideology not evidence, suicide rates are higher for boys, boys are significantly more likely to fail classes, less likely to go to college,etc. Men are given much harsher prison sentences when convicted of crimes than women. Mutilating the g…
/r/MensRights13/07/20 01:39 AM
9

Most rape is largely about sex not power. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/insight-therapy/201602/rape-is-not-only-about-power-it-s-also-about-sex https://medium.com/the-establishment/its-not-about-sex-it-s-about-power-and-other-lies-261c99fc0a0a https://www.huffpost.com/entry/rape-is-about-sex-and-we-need-to-stop-saying-its-not_b_9866496
/r/MensRights28/06/20 11:15 PM
0

Having watched the video, she (mostly) isn't wrong. The problem is she largely acts like a lot of the stuff like it almost entirely is coming from one way (men to women) while pretending the other is not a major issue. She also didn't dox anyone in this video (she did in a previous video she deleted). Society fails both sexes and chooses to excuse them when they do things that they should not do far more than it should. The behavior she is on the receiving end of is unacceptable harassment that …
/r/MensRights12/05/20 08:00 PM
1

The US allows you to be forced to pay for a child that is not yours. France despite the fact that you cannot casually get a paternity test thankfully at least does not follow the same level of absurdity. While getting a DNA test for peace of mind is not an option, once the court is involved a DNA test can easily be ordered to make sure it actually is your kid or not. France not allowing DNA testing is commonly misunderstood and treated as trying to protect women at the expense of men. Which whil…
/r/MensRights23/04/20 09:21 PM
1

You literally have been arguing with me specifically on the matter of France. You mentioned France to begin with, my entire comment was explaining where France's unique stance actually comes from and it has nothing to do with your bullshit claim. Funny considering I am not a feminist and nothing I said is supporting of feminists. Again on a fundamental level if you consider children to have the same medical rights as adults and a right to privacy at all France is right. The reason parents are of…
/r/MensRights23/04/20 07:47 PM
0

Again you do not even have basic reading comprehension. If the child is not yours you do not have to pay child support in France, since a DNA test ordered by the court will reflect that. The French also do not have alimony. You are not forced to pay for a child that is not yours. You have a lot of strong opinions for someone that has no clue what the fuck they aree talking about. Though that goes well with your need for using strawman arguments.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 04:17 PM
0

Fuck off you piece of shit. No it isn't, it is already something addressed for child support. I literally have said nothing of the sort, meanwhile you are blatantly lying and misrepresenting what I have said. If you consider children to have the same rights it is the logical result. It is not in the child's interest to allow DNA testing to be forced onto them by a parent that just wants to know that it really is their kid in a relationship they are staying in. It has nothing to do with how eithe…
/r/MensRights23/04/20 03:55 PM
0

That has jack fucking shit to do with why the French do not allow children to be forced to take a DNA test. It is literally NOT in the child's interest. It is a violation of the rights of the child that only serves to create peace of mind for one or both parents. On a fundamental level they are right. Even if in practice it fucks over men way more than women who, ultimately it is the logical conclusion if you apply rights to everyone. Edit: it is also worth mentioning that judges can still order…
/r/MensRights23/04/20 01:40 AM
1

No it wasn't it was something psychologists have said for a long time. There is a time and place, bottling up your emotions isn't healthy. On top of that one of the biggest reasons that Egypt holds that view is the fact that over 90% of its population follows a backwards religion that is extremely sexist and violent. Egypt is over 90% Muslim. Of Muslims polled in Egypt 94% believe you cannot be moral if you don't believe in God. 95% hold the view that sex outside of marriage is immoral. 94% find…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 11:27 PM
4

The idea of men being able to be emotional is way older than Oprah. There is a big difference between being an emotional wreck and expressing one's emotions.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 10:40 PM
1

This reminds me of a professor I had for a diversity class that was required for my program. It is a really long story but due to her behavior I ended up getting her fired from two different jobs.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 09:42 PM
1

Judge Judy is arbitration not mediation. She hears evidence and makes her decision based on it, compared to mediation which requires all parties agree.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 07:20 PM
3

Technically her rulings are legally binding arbitration agreements which they agree to do in place of going to court since they don't end up paying for her rulings instead they just take the money out of how much they pay people to appear on the show.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 07:17 PM
7

"With a stage light shining on them, Taylor lifted Rainey’s skirt and grabbed her bare buttocks and vagina. She tried to break away, but he did it again — this time lifting her rear end up and exposing her intimate parts to the gawking crowd. As Rainey struggled to push him away and lower her skirt, he grabbed her bare buttocks and vagina a third time. He also grabbed and ‘juggled’ her breasts for the entertainment of the onlookers, " On top of that he repeatedly lied to the court and harassed h…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 09:42 PM
3

I am just going to point out that when you try to trick a judge they can just adjust it for that reason. There is a lot of things judges can do to prevent someone from hiding wealth.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 09:40 PM
4

"With a stage light shining on them, Taylor lifted Rainey’s skirt and grabbed her bare buttocks and vagina. She tried to break away, but he did it again — this time lifting her rear end up and exposing her intimate parts to the gawking crowd. As Rainey struggled to push him away and lower her skirt, he grabbed her bare buttocks and vagina a third time. He also grabbed and ‘juggled’ her breasts for the entertainment of the onlookers, " No he sexually assaulted her, they also both violated the con…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 09:38 PM
10

1 it wasn't over a groping it was over a sexual assault (way beyond just grabbing her ass) which happened in front of a crowd including him exposing her to the crowd 2 he repeatedly harassed her during the trial 3 he lied to the court repeatedly 4 he skipped the trial and then lied about the reason. OP posted a MASSIVELY misleading title. "With a stage light shining on them, Taylor lifted Rainey’s skirt and grabbed her bare buttocks and vagina. She tried to break away, but he did it again — this…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 09:36 PM
2

This was only a civil trial.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 08:42 PM
3

Realize what he was accused of... and then add in repeatedly lying to the court and harassing the woman during the trial, and even skipping court and lying about why he didn't show up. I would say it is a slap on the wrist if the accusation is true. If he actually did sexually assault her he belongs in prison.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 08:02 PM
2

The threads title is not even close to accurate. 1 the sexual assault included repeatedly groping he including exposing her to a crowd, 2 it wasn't during a date for the TV show it actually was in violation of the contract they signed with the TV show, 3 only 1 million of that was over the sexual assault the rest was due to his behavior during the entire court case including lying to the court repeatedly.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:44 PM
2

If he did what he is accused of he should have to serve way more than a few months in prison, and he should lose his wealth. Sexually assaulting someone should not be a slap on the wrist for either sex.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:40 PM
7

I would say if someone actually is sexually assaulted by someone losing their wealth is a slap on the wrist when the piece of shit belongs in prison.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:37 PM
2

Except that he sexually assaulted her in front of a crowd and almost everything in the title is also wrong or misleading.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:28 PM
5

Stop trying to make this sub look bad.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:25 PM
1

EVERYONE had it really bad back in the day unless you were in nobility. It was not the women that would be executed en masse after battles in most cases, and it was not the women being sent to die en masse to protect the other sex. It was not the women that were forced to do constant labor, etc.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 06:43 PM
1

Men have been seen as lesser beings for thousands of years. It is why the men are expected to die to save the women.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 01:06 PM
6

Except that it means that it is against women most of the time despite how normalized sexism against men is. The education system is designed to be sexist against men, men are valued as being worth less than women, female abuse against men is due to sexism as many women will tell you (the reason they hit men is they know they won't hit them back), etc.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 12:01 AM
6

Remind me which sex has died en masse due to sexism?
/r/MensRights04/04/20 11:55 PM
1

People return to school much later in life pretty often, hell for some industries it is pretty normal to take a class or two every few years. You probably don't realize how normal it is, but if you go to college or university you will find that there are plenty of older people especially in night and online classes. For example I know a lot of teachers that returned to school due to requirements to teach higher grades or because they want to become professors. Plus different places have differen…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 06:56 PM
6

They lied to you, the charges weren't dropped but they did get a slap on the wrist compared to if the roles were swapped. Basically all they got was community service.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 02:15 PM
1

One is just suspended for 2 years.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 02:13 PM
1

Sorry, I didn't notice the typo with that sentence typing married and unmarried so much I was bound to mess one of them up lol Married queens were the most likely followed by both married and unmarried kings, then at the bottom was unmarried queens.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 03:26 PM
0

It doesn't support the idea female rulers are more likely to start wars which you claimed. Its just the married ones were more likely to start them.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 09:21 PM
2

History doesn't support your claim as it is stated. In fact the source everyone constantly gets the idea from doesn't conclude that at all. It specifically found married women started wars more often than married or unmarried kings, but unmarried queens were rarely initiators of war.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 06:21 PM
7

There is a reason it was specifically married queens that were more likely to start wars compared to single kings, married kings, and single queens. Queens that were not married were not war hungry, they were disproportionately attacked however. In terms of starting wars married queens were at the top no contest, but both married and unmarried kings were more likely to start a war than an unmarried queen. You will notice the source of female rulers being in more wars does not support the idea of…
/r/MensRights25/03/20 06:14 PM
-7

To be fair part of the reason wars are more likely to start when you have a female ruler is usually they put their husband in charge of the military. Leading to less opposition than you would see from leaders not sleeping with you.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 05:22 PM
3

2 has no concern with equality, enslaving all men also would fall under definition 2.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 05:11 AM
3

No they don't. Definition 1 is concerned with equality, definition 2 is not concerned with equality. Female supremacy and the subjugation of the male sex would be feminist under the second definition. Radical feminism is still feminism, and radical feminism includes extremely sexist views.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 04:40 AM
2

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/feminism No it isn't.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 04:27 AM
1

Reddit doesn't have a policy against it, but it does against ban evasion. Technically provided you never actually post on a sub you are banned from you are good. Since r/rape doesn't ban you until you comment on it the first time you can use an alt to post there provided you never comment here on it.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 04:11 AM
4

Feminism is cancer. There are two definitions of feminism 1 sexual egalitarianism 2 female empowerment. We support 1, we acknowledge 2 is sexist bullshit. You will find more support for ERA here than you would among feminists who split over it. Feminists meanwhile created and support the Duluth Model which even the people responsible for oppose now and regret because it extremely unjustly assumes all domestic violence is committed by men.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 04:08 AM
3

Feel free to post in r/rape2, I made the sub literally for this very reason.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 03:58 AM
6

This isn't a hate sub... in fact a lot of the people here are women the demographic you seem to think this sub hates.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 03:56 AM
1

I mean the rest of the sentence does make the point that seeing yourself as an equal while needing a bunch of one sided protections basically means you aren't. That isn't a sexist statement. This almost certainly isn't by a Japanese woman either.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 04:57 PM
1

Not just the women, also the men. When they survey men a very large amount feel they are not in a position to marry or have kids due to how much time they spend working. They want to be at a point in their life that it isn't a massive burden and that they can be good husbands and fathers but are aware of the reality of what their work life requires.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 04:52 PM
1

The cake shop was an actual argument of freedom to practice his religion and against compelled speech. A company does not have the right to discriminate against protected characteristics simply because they want to. A barber shop is open to the public, social clubs are allowed to discriminate barber shops are not. Places like barber shops however do not have to change the types of services they provide. If a woman comes in wanting a crew cut he would have to do so provided he offers crew cuts to…
/r/MensRights18/02/20 02:00 PM
1

Not really, it is no worse than going shopping to me. It isn't fun but it is hardly the end of the world and I can at least kill time while I wait. It isn't like she would actually care if I went somewhere else while she got her hair done.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 01:47 PM
2

They broke Jim Crow laws... Yes what you said actually would have them in prison. The Black Panthers legally open carried to protect their communities and racists changed the law to make open carry illegal. They still carried because the reality is not doing so would have meant more of their people being killed by racists. Marrying someone of another race was illegal, being married to someone of another race was illegal. YOU are the one disregarding how US law works because we have long operated…
/r/MensRights18/02/20 05:17 AM
1

That is essentially what is done a lot actually.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 04:42 AM
3

No they don't. WTF is wrong with you? By your logic people that fought for civil rights belong in prison. You would have people locked up for interracial marriage when the SCOTUS struck down such laws as unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 04:41 AM
4

It is one's moral obligation to stand up against unjust laws. Those that fought segregation also chose to break the law.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 04:37 AM
-3

You do not have the right to refuse service on the basis of protected characteristics. There literally are a bunch of federal laws as well as laws in every state prohibiting it. You have no fucking clue what you are talking about. Exceptions are specific such as why social clubs can discriminate. Your local burger joint cannot refuse to serve blacks. You cannot require someone provide services they normally do not however. If you provide crewcuts and a woman asks for a crewcuts you cannot refuse…
/r/MensRights17/02/20 05:45 PM
-2

A business cannot discriminate against protected classes just because they feel like it. Social clubs can because freedom of association (female only gyms use this basis), hair places do not need to change their styles but cannot simply discriminate against sex. However, some states do have separate certificates/liscenses for each sex when it comes to hair. Basically boiling down to tomboys can go to a barber and drag queens can go to a hair salon.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 05:05 PM
-1

I mean I have went with my GF for her to get her hair done. She also would go with me to the barber in the same situation. You just kill time on the phone or reading a book.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 05:03 PM
4

WTF is wrong with you, someone isn't automatically perverted for asking what if they want a girl instead of a boy.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 03:30 PM
1

I will be honest here finding sexist comments here isn't that hard. They are often from understandable frustration on topics like male rape victims facing a double standard.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 05:09 PM
3

Rape isn't about sex but power remember? So as a man you only care about power and as a gay you have less and thus are obviously a walking rapist waiting for a woman to overpower.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 04:59 PM
1

There is one in the city I live in. It's not a common thing but single screen theaters having bathrooms only for 2 people at a time does happen. Hell the big movie theater near us has 2 single stalls near the lines, but 2 large rest rooms on each end once you get pat the ticket check.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 10:10 PM
3

I have, it is not that common but it does happen.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 03:34 PM
0

I have been in theaters that do have small restrooms. It does happen especially with smaller theaters.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 03:27 PM
5

Except that is not the simplest or even most logical explanation. The truth is more likely based on building code in the state changing. This happens to mens rooms in several of states due to being single stall + urinal and the code deciding single stall restrooms are considered gender neutral. Meanwhile when built usually they will be 2 stalls for women and 1 stall + 1 urinal for men. This meets the requirements in damn near every state since they often allow a urinal to be counted as a stall f…
/r/MensRights02/01/20 04:05 AM
4

Fuck off, nobody has time to deal with trolls like you.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 03:51 AM
1

r/jailbait is banned Also the porn industry isn't actually aimed at men. It is pretty well split in who it is aimed at. In fact the larger industry (the sex industry) is MASSIVELY female centered.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 01:21 AM
3

Not really, most of Europe is still happily embracing "progress" with only a small portion seeing it for the BS it often is. They aren't near rebellion. Nowadays most people do not care enough unless the government goes to China levels of BS.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 07:03 PM
-1

It is illegal to do so, people protest in front of the SCOTUS almost always off of the official grounds and are routinely arrested for protesting in front of it. In fact if you bother to add one simple word you instead get... https://wjla.com/resources/media/299cb353-945d-44c9-b308-0ada22502ff9-large16x9_kAVpRIOSDFF.JPG?1538854907910 https://www.peoplesworld.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/960x540APkavanaugh_protest_arrests_DC.jpg https://media4.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2018_40/2595221/181006-kava…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 07:27 AM
-4

This is simply not true. The following are ALL recognized as unprotected speech... Obscenity Fighting words Defamation (including libel and slander) Child pornography Perjury Blackmail Incitement to imminent lawless action True threats Solicitations to commit crimes Treason Plagiarism While nobody is going to argue against CP being illegal, the first three are all legal speech to restrict that can in fact include hate speech. On top of that the federal government DOES outlaw speech ironically en…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 07:04 AM
-2

Speaking critical of something does NOT make you a danger to the public. WTF type of delusion do you have? Speech is not endangering anyone. You do realize its legal to protest on roads right? It isn't ignoring road safety, they close down roads for protests all the time. It is specifically prohibited for interstate highways and bridges. You don't have any civil rights experts supporting your argument, meanwhile legal experts HAVE been fighting 40 U.S. Code § 6135 the entire time. In fact the ON…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 02:44 AM
-4

The SCOTUS is the most important place to be able to protest in front of, civil rights experts have opposed it being illegal to protest there for the 70 years that it has been the case. As I already pointed out, the US has already restricted what you can do. Also you cannot really protest anywhere else. In almost every case of where it is important to protest they LEGALLY can send you to protest elsewhere and they do. Political rallies for example often force protesters to be completely out of t…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 01:51 AM
-7

The US has ruled free speech doesn't apply to words that offend people. Look into the rulings relating to fighting words.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 01:46 AM
11

Because it is still one of the best in the world. Honestly nobody would seriously put it in the bottom 1/4 of the countries. There are a LOT of countries that none of us would want to live in. The UK is in the middle of sending itself back in the name of progress. People forget most European countries and the US are doing a lot of the same stupid shit.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 12:36 AM
-16

Fuck off with the US propaganda, the UK is not disarmed. It is relatively easy to get a gun. On top of that while the hate speech being illegal BS is stupid, its not nearly as bad as the death of the 1st in the US. You cannot protest in front of the SCOTUS. There is literally a law that prohibits protesting in front of the highest court. "It is unlawful to parade, stand, or move in processions or assemblages in the Supreme Court Building or grounds, or to display in the Building and grounds a fl…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 12:32 AM
2

No it isn't and saying it is is extremely dishonest. In fact Asian cultures very much understand that toxic masculinity is a thing but masculinity itself is not toxic. The might makes right, and loudest voice is right mentality both are toxic aspects associated with masculinity. Meanwhile self discipline is viewed positively.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 02:01 AM
1

Yes but it actually does have mainstream support.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 09:50 PM
2

Except that people generally aren't okay with that and those that believe that are a fringe minority. There are also black supremacist groups which have advocated genocide against whites. Fringe minorities are not representative of the norm. On top of that what is considered acting white is very subjective. The love of my life supposedly acts white because of things like that she talks properly and likes to read. I know plenty of black people that share the view that such things are white behavi…
/r/MensRights11/12/19 04:49 PM
7

Most people that criticize the black community actually openly acknowledge we need more good role models in the black communities. Murder rates are ridiculously high among black men due to massive societal failures. Even when people try to dismiss the problem as mostly being gang related it still goes back to societal failure that makes them receptive to joining gangs.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 03:54 PM
13

Less stigmatized? You clearly have never been a fat guy. No people are far more likely to bully and harass you over it for one simple fact. Fat women are still women and people will stand up for them more often if they appear to be being mistreated.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 05:35 PM
1

Almost every comic they did after introducing her until they started pandering to the crowd that complained about how their relationship isn't healthy and had her hook up with Ivy instead. Multiple writers have in their own words said that he does love her at least to some extent. He also in universe has repeatedly shown he views such things as a weakness because it can be exploited and used against you.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 03:48 PM
1

To be fair comic Joker and Harley DO at least love each other... the thing people do not grasp is that is literally WHY he tries to kill her repeatedly. He views it as a weakness not a strength.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:35 AM
4

Are you saying I am not a King?
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:31 AM
-1

Lets be honest here... neither sex was saving their self on marriage. Marriage was a social pressure that people were forced into the woman got pregnant or else they would both look bad.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:18 AM
2

Stop womansplaining to me, also typical woman always assuming you are right because you are a woman.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 02:03 AM
1

Women that agree with the first article are often the women nobody wants to touch. They don't have a problem due to sexualizing someone being wrong but because they are the loser in the situation.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 11:56 PM
3

Have you considered the fact that it's due to men disproportionately having the ideal traits for leadership. This is similar to how the average grades work out. Boys tend to make up both extremes. A small minority of people make ideal leaders... Some of the most important traits are ones that men tend to have more due to the fact we are competition oriented.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 04:20 PM
15

It's due to choice not sexism. The average woman in the STEM field is less qualified and paid more for their position on top of it the apparent sexism goes away when you look at the amount of people getting an education in said field. Also nice to know you think so lowly of women that they need constant support for the STEM field but boys need none.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 04:14 PM
9

Fuck off troll
/r/MensRights23/10/19 04:11 PM
2

Honestly the SOR should be abolished in the first place it has repeatedly been shown to increase the chance that someone reoffend and decrease the chances of them maintaining treatment. It exists to make people feel safer not to actually make people safer.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 04:43 PM
1

You had sex without being married... So you cannot get married. No no they shouldn't.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 04:41 PM
6

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11962537/Whats-so-funny-about-a-mens-rights-debate.html Jess Philips for one, when it was suggested they discuss the issue of male suicide she laughed at them. Feminists aren't trying to dismantle the patriarchy, they have also never considered any mens issues as important they only care about empowering women. Feminism does oppose mens voices, they have repeatedly attempted to silence the voice of male victims. Feminists have consistently opposed the…
/r/MensRights10/10/19 02:27 PM
1

Yes that would be reciprocal domestic abuse.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 01:18 AM
2

Incidents of abuse.... Women tend to attack men first a lot more than men attack women first.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 08:48 PM
2

Yes. Because women are valued over men and always have been. Combine that with the physical difference between the two sexes on average and the fact most women don't want to work. Seriously financial abuse is even pushed as a thing now. If she doesn't want to work and you don't want her spending your money without your permission it is even considered abusive.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 08:46 PM
4

Nobody is saying men should abuse women. Feminists however have pushed that women abusing men is virtually non-existent.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 08:43 PM
12

No it has to do with the fact voices for men are ridiculed and shamed by the feminists. If feminism was concerned about merely having equality by lifting up women where they are unduly burdened nobody would have a problem with them. Male suicide is made into a joke because of feminists, so is the fact men have to register for the draft. Frankly the idea any group claims to be for equality by speaking up for one side but opposes another side even having a voice means they aren't for equality.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 05:39 PM
8

The fact it involves men is what makes it treated as a nonissue, a lot of female genital mutilation is frankly less severe than circumcision. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98f3IavuEgQ
/r/MensRights04/10/19 03:43 PM
9

Do you think that AS A BABY when it was done to you that it caused you harm? You not remembering being harmed does not mean it isn't harmful. Hell the same applies to piercing babies ears. Most people that do ear piercings even will tell you they don't like doing it because it clearly hurts the baby when it happens and babies dont want it done.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 03:20 PM
8

Do you think cutting someones flesh is harming them? People don't consider their self harmed because they are taught not to. Your view is based on being Jewish, in which it is a religious requirement. Even those that are not observant still do so because it is a tradition that is a part of their culture. There are cultures that have the daughters raped by a stranger for their first sexual experience as well as ones that teach little boys that they have to suck off grown men and swallow their sem…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 02:53 PM
10

Not really, do you think someone has the right to mutilate someone else's body? Personally I don't think anyone has the right to cause another human being harm without their permission unless acting in defense. I am not going to say it is top of the list of things I care about. Issues like suicide are way higher, but I do think it is an issue we should address given its popularity in America literally was to make sex less pleasurable to make boys less likely to masturbate. Now it is "well they d…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 02:34 PM
9

Begone troll
/r/MensRights04/10/19 02:27 PM
3

Not completely true, they can to restore and maintain peace when there is reason to believe it would be disrupted if behavior was allowed to continue and the like. As well as they can do so for things like establishing a parameter for a crime scene. The biggest example of this that comes up is protesters and opposing protesters. If they are antagonistic groups the police can force them to be far enough away from each other to minimize a chance of disturbing the peace but cannot favor either side…
/r/MensRights27/09/19 01:23 AM
1

It is perfectly legal to refuse a police order, the law is very specific in when you must obey them. Usually being when there is a breach of the peace caused by your actions.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 01:02 AM
18

You wouldn't go to jail. Literally all you have to do is ask if it is illegal. The officer will acknowledge nothing about it is illegal... they just dont like it. That said they will try to pressure you into leaving anyway. Source: I have been stopped by police at least 100 times for walking late at night with baggie clothes, relaxing at a park, being on a beach at night (it is a public beach that technically only restricts when you can swim), etc. It turns out most cops will not do anything bec…
/r/MensRights27/09/19 12:56 AM
5

No, there is no requirement to claim paternity in the first place. You also enjoy the benefit getting forced into a DNA test is extremely hard. So unless you chose to claim the child, its hard to prove they are yours. However, once you make that decision, it is not in the childs interest for them to prove otherwise since the benefits they gain would be endangered. While it is in my head...A child can agree to it as well but that mostly only matters for older children. They have a few reasons for…
/r/MensRights19/09/19 04:43 AM
6

Not quite... A judge can approve a DNA test. They also have a very legitimate albeit different approach to it. Individuals have a right to privacy when it comes to medical information. Parents have access to the medical information of a child when it is in the childs interest (which basically means damn near always). You are not required to agree that the child is yours. However, once you make that agreement there is no argument that it is in the childs interest to prove that they are not your c…
/r/MensRights19/09/19 03:37 AM
3

And because men have been arrested for doing so... and there is often no established primary care giver due to the laws only applying to babies under 1 year.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 03:22 AM
4

I do, in the US there is not any legally enforceable law for what you are talking about. The attempt to pass ridiculous laws against the right to choose that were that extremewere stopped for being outright against RvW.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 09:08 PM
11

All over, google mattress girl.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 03:02 PM
4

Plan B Plan B Not how the law actually works Not how the law actually works
/r/MensRights14/09/19 03:01 PM
11

This is patently false, https://www.newson6.com/story/34240493/ok-man-ordered-to-pay-child-support-despite-not-being-father https://nypost.com/2017/07/23/man-ordered-to-pay-65k-in-child-support-for-kid-who-isnt-his/
/r/MensRights14/09/19 02:59 PM
5

As someone that was guaranteed a free ride at two of the best universities for it when I wanted to do game design... I have experienced most of that outside of the kid issue. I gave up on being a game designer and went for a completely different field because I decided being happy wouldn't happen in a hell hole like the major game studios with shitty pay and being treated like shit. It was a dream job to young me but the reality of the industry made me decide to do something else. I would prefer…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 09:20 PM
1

Men are conditioned since birth to be providers and happiness is secondary to financial success. Women aren't pressured to chase the paycheck. They tend towards more satisfying and fulfilling jobs or jobs that offer a higher degree of flexibility. Add in physical labor which is some of the best paying jobs for those with low education being physically taxing and harder for women. Then you have jobs that aren't safe and have hazard pay which men do in large number because we are taught to do so s…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 09:00 PM
5

Alternatively pay declines due to women entering the industry accepting lower pay and not insisting to be paid as much. Women report success less often then men and push for raises less frequently and aggressively. Men work more hours on average. Men call out less. Men do overtime more often. It's not as simple as more women means we can pay less for the job. There are a lot of factors in play and men and women both have factors that come into play for pay. If EVERY job paid the same amount men …
/r/MensRights25/08/19 08:55 PM
2

... Not possible for most women, there actually are women that look like Barbie naturally just like the woman with a waist small enough you can wrap just your hands around her whole waist. Also most male celebrities are on a bunch of drugs including steroids, in some cases to look beyond normally possible. This is something several celebrities have acknowledged as a problem for their own health. However it is not something people usually think of for perspective.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 01:48 AM
1

Not to be that person but an acquittal is not being found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt the jury exists to favor the accused on the idea its better the guilty go free than innocent not. There is a problem with a LOT of the elements of a trial favoring prosecution but being innocent and found guilty is significantly less likely than the opposite while both do occur the guilty go free more often due to the jury.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 09:21 PM
2

I suggest googling Adam ruins everything DNA
/r/MensRights31/05/19 09:11 PM
2

I agree that verifying they are being honest is an issue but that does not make the issues illegitimate. Neither parties consent should always be needed. It says if they still oppose it they will help with your options moving forward, that doesn't mean it doesn't matter what he is. You have options in any case and it is virtually impossible to put a child up for adoption without the other parent being able to take full custody if they are able.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 08:08 PM
3

Being unknown, you can't get consent. Incarcerated, they cannot raise the child. Abusive, they should not raise the child. These are very legitimate reasons the mother shouldn't be prevented over. Incarnation if its short term is less likely to be an issue but long term incarnation adoption should still be an option for the sake of the child. There is the possibility to do an open adoption including to a relative of the person as well if they still want to be in their life while incarcerated whi…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 04:54 PM
12

Here is a simple one.... you are removing part of their body which serves a purpose and removing it does nothing of benefit and is done for cosmetic reasons. Its abuse.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 06:53 PM
2

Getting married makes you legally responsible if they have a child during it that is not yours. Yet again notice the man is the only one fucked in the situation.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:20 AM
1

The problems mostly come from the fact men cannot prove they are the parent in time in most cases. Judges are justifiably hesitant to order DNA testing before the baby is born and while it is being argued in court that you are the father and object she can still legally do so unless ordered by the court not to (which wouldn't happen unless she expressed a desire to do so). The window is so tight that is fucks the men over in most cases since they do not have the ability to establish parental rig…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:17 AM
2

It is not illegal, child abandonment (the crime)is not what I am talking about is the abandonment of parental obligations such as safe haven laws which have massive design flaws. Due to the anonymous nature men are not informed and will only know if told of they decided as a couple to do so. In practice men cannot do so, men that have tried to take advantage of safe haven laws have been arrested for doing so meanwhile women can. This is because unless you are married or your name is on the birth…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:10 AM
1

They are called safe haven laws, there is not an indefinite amount of time (usually between 3 days and a month) but it is anonymous you can leave it at whatever locations the state law says. Generally speaking it is expected you will do something to make sure someone realizes the baby is there (such as ring a doorbell and walkaway somewhere out of sight and watch to make sure it gets noticed). It is a case of well intentioned legislation that has fucked up results. This can also happen with adop…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:02 AM
3

If the mother CHOOSES to keep the child knowing that the father does not want anything to do with it she should be the one taking care of the child. She is afterall also the only one able to in practice also abandon her parental rights after the child is born. After the child is born the mother can legally surrender her parental obligations by leaving the child at one of several different places such as fire departments, hospitals, etc. There is no means which in practice men can actually surren…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:50 AM
2

I will give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that by wrong he meant immoral/unjust not false. Most people agree on the more extreme absurdities that men face being unjust.... They just won't do anything to change it. This is like the court saying lying about wearing a condom to trick someone into having sex is rape but lying about being on the pill to do so isn't on the basis all men apparently would still choose to have sex but obviously women would refuse despite no evidence being show…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:35 AM
2

Except that the ability to abandon parental responsibility lies solely with the woman even after they have given birth and nobody is advocating forcing women to get abortions or anything else. Women LEGALLY can abandon their parental obligations even after a child is born with 0 repercussions. That is not something men enjoy the luxury of. When it comes to parental responsibility there is 0 reason men should be forced to pay for a child they did not want that a woman chose to keep.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:29 AM
3

Are you not willing to go to sleep knowing that there is the POSSIBILITY that something could happen? The possibility of something to happen does not mean it is reasonable to assume something would happen. If you got a vasectomy you did the most that can reasonably asked of someone to prevent pregnancy from occurring.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:25 AM
8

I think most people here would agree both sides being treated the SAME is preferable meaning if women can opt out so should men be able to, notice nobody is arguing that women shouldn't be able to do so merely that women have a choice in opting out while men don't. Hell male rape victims that were not even old enough to consent can be forced to pay child support for the result of their rape with no say in the matter at all.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:53 PM
13

So what you are saying is when you decide to go to sleep and wake up to being raped it is your fault? How about when the person pokes a hole in the condom? Or any of the many other ways that men have ended up creating children without choosing to do so... WTF is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:49 PM
1

Except womens rooms are much worse than mens rooms, seriously ask any janitor.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 01:25 PM
4

The funny thing is they actually have one of the lowest recidivism rates out of every category of crime. It was largely something made up by Hollywood with the only commonly referenced study making that claim being heavily discredited due to multiple major issues (almost all of them were high risk offenders, any future arrests were treated as them being guilty offending even if the charges were dropped, etc).
/r/MensRights30/05/18 12:17 PM
2

Fun fact, coin flips are not actually 50/50 they favor one side SLIGHTLY more than the other due to the slight weight differences. IIRC with the US quarter (eagle back) heads is slightly more common.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 11:14 PM
73

Hell I would just ask a random woman "can you check to see if the womans room is empty for me I need to change my kid and there aren't any changing tables in the mens room". Most people are decent if a situation is explained to them.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 12:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter