TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kinseyincanada Archive

View 0 posts and 175 comments by Kinseyincanada on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

All in saying is it's kind of silly to say men had it harder because they had to go to war. Women wernt seen as equal so they wernt allowed. It's like saying slaves had it better financially because they didn't have to worry about money.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 09:43 PM
10

Well kinda hard for women to die in a war when men didn't let them fight
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:26 PM
0

Because workers deserve basic rights?
/r/MensRights06/04/14 02:39 AM
0

Or you know mandated coverage like the majority of the world.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 02:28 AM
1

But men can also get maternity leave.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 02:03 AM
0

And yet you will trust a sub that refers to feminists as feminazis? Don't you see the how that's kind hypocritical?
/r/MensRights21/03/14 06:24 AM
-1

"What fraction are women-only, and what fraction are men-only" Catholic Charity Mens Hostel is men only, Yukon has men only beds, so does the Beacon heres the thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/vancouver/comments/20xof8/vancouver_dtes_shelter_removes_beds_for_men_to/
/r/MensRights21/03/14 06:20 AM
1

Because it costs money to open them
/r/MensRights21/03/14 06:09 AM
-1

Read the thread in r/Vancouver. I know my city and I know this shelter. The overwhelming vast majority of beds in the city are for men with a tiny fraction being women only.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 06:05 AM
0

The bed were not being used at all. They didn't refuse anyone anything. The wing before was just for men. Where was all the outrage over them denying women?
/r/MensRights21/03/14 05:52 AM
-8

The funding came from private donors. So I just don't understand why you rather have an unused wing for men rather than a wing for women?
/r/MensRights21/03/14 12:42 AM
-10

You rather they kept the wing unused?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 10:20 PM
-7

Errr the wing wasn't being used. They arnt kicking anyone out they are just increasing it.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 10:20 PM
4

Is there any evidence that not dressing a certain way in any way prevents rape?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 12:38 AM
1

Or ya know live in a normal fucking society that can seem up skirt photos illegal.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:52 PM
2

Pretty sure forcing and drugging someone to get an abortion is a super shitty thing to do
/r/MensRights31/01/14 08:00 PM
1

There is a guy a few comments down with upvotes saying this was self defense...
/r/MensRights29/01/14 10:29 PM
1

Sorry meant wearing a seatbelt
/r/MensRights24/01/14 07:02 AM
7

wearing a seatbelt has been proven to reduce injury. Clothing and being in a bad neighborhood haven't shown to reducer rape
/r/MensRights24/01/14 06:33 AM
4

No one ever gets offender by fake rape accusations?
/r/MensRights26/12/13 04:47 PM
1

Look if you wanna rise out all your condoms because you don't truss your girlfriend at all go right ahead. I have every right to think you're crazy as fuck.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 10:55 PM
0

What's the downside you arnt planing to attack her are you?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 04:05 AM
-2

He is 100% legally right to do so. Still makes it a crazy paranoid behavior. If he doesn't trust this girl enough to not mark his used condoms then why they he'll is he with her? Would you be ok with a girl constantly carrying a weapon just In case you attack and rape her? Statistically that's a more likely scenario than sperm jacking.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 02:21 AM
2

What if she constantly carried a weapon just in case you would attack and rape her
/r/MensRights04/12/13 01:59 AM
6

Because it's come off as crazy as fuck
/r/MensRights04/12/13 01:57 AM
5

Except the multiple cases where women have been forced to be strip searched that come out plenty of times. There are a ton of examples, this isn't limited to men
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:27 PM
10

its the top post in twox right now
/r/MensRights25/09/13 03:28 AM
-1

the fuck does this have to do with r/bestof?
/r/MensRights23/07/13 11:39 PM
-5

So no proof then?
/r/MensRights23/07/13 09:57 PM
-13

any proof of the evil feminist scheme?
/r/MensRights23/07/13 09:02 PM
0

there have been restrictions for certain subs for some time now
/r/MensRights23/07/13 09:02 PM
-1

Its also accurate in the sense that men's rights exists to primarily bitch about feminism and not actually help men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:57 PM
5

well considering a gift is considerably different than sexual texts, i dont think its a fair comparison.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 09:26 PM
2

ok so we have the cops talking to him and his mom yelling at him. Where does feminism come in? You dont think its just possible the kid had severe mental issues?
/r/MensRights18/06/13 09:10 PM
2

what facts? you just rambled on about feminism. There is zero evidence that he was going to be charged what so ever. He was making unwanted sexual texts towards someone and the police spoke with him. Maybe the kid committed suicide because he got rejected? or because he was depressed ort a thousands other reasons that are more logical then feminism bad.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:59 PM
4

ok so this kid was sending unwanted sexual texts to a girl and then he killed himself and thats because of feminism and not him being depressed and having other issues? its feminism? Is there anything this sub doesnt blame feminism on?
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:35 PM
6

feminsm made him kill himself after sending unwanted sexual texts to a girl?
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:32 PM
2

where do you even come up with this crap?
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:31 PM
3

"Det Sgt Lee Neiles, of Kent Police, told the inquest: 'She wanted them to stop so yea she did
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:30 PM
-1

Well considering I personally know people in this investigation and they all say her claims are 100% true. I know you are lying.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 04:33 PM
-1

yea thats my point, you can easily be lying, you have provided zero proof to any of your claims what so ever. The onus is on you to provide proof. You cant just say this girl is lying you need actual evidence.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 04:29 PM
-2

That's not proof. You can easily be lying
/r/MensRights18/06/13 01:55 PM
3

Because they commit more crimes
/r/MensRights09/03/13 09:51 AM
1

well I know she was arrested
/r/MensRights19/02/13 06:23 PM
1

Well that was like half his comment, it's the one part I was addressing.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 05:03 PM
1

It said feminism can't be about equality because it has the word fem in it. Since men's rights had the word men in it, I assume that it can't be about equality because it has men in it.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 04:21 PM
-4

So then it isn't about gender equality
/r/MensRights19/02/13 06:47 AM
1

We one of your point is that feminism can't be about gender equality because it has "fem" in it. So men's rights can't be about gender equality because it only has men in it.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 06:42 AM
-4

So then men's rights isn't about gender equality?
/r/MensRights19/02/13 04:17 AM
3

Is that why she was arrested and held on bail?
/r/MensRights19/02/13 04:14 AM
0

Yea it wasn't equal for women to be in the same roles as men so why should the standards be equal? It would be women who are equal to men were refused the same roles. Now that's its equal it should be equal for the same roles. Someone said regular troops are supposed to do 37 push-ups. That doesn't seem crazy ridiculous.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:49 PM
0

Yea because females weren't allowed in combat
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:42 PM
2

well there currently isnt a draft going on
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:03 PM
1

it takes a male to get pregnant its not just the girls fault
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:02 PM
0

there no indication that it wont be the same
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:58 PM
-3

its actually awesome
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:56 PM
1

seems silly to call a movement mens rights when its for everyone
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:55 PM
1

So maybe we should segregate all men and women cause these men can't seem to control themselves rationally. Some just tape them others irrationally protect them.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:08 PM
0

Good thing were making steps to make it more equal
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:01 PM
1

Canada
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:00 PM
1

So woman shouldn't be allowed in combat because men can't treat them equally. Sounds like a problem with the men. Seems contradictory that they would commit war crimes over them getting hurt, when there are high numbers if sexual assault against women on army bases
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:56 PM
1

So you honesty believe there isn't a single female that can do 35 push ups?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:53 PM
1

Ok if the military testing is not spot on, how do we know the men are up to the task?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 09:22 AM
1

They have tests to determine if you are fit enough, if a woman can pass then there is no problem. How hard is that to understand?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 08:48 AM
2

Good thing they have tests to determine this
/r/MensRights24/01/13 08:34 AM
0

"So for their service to their country, their willingness to sacrifice their lives, the intense hatred they get from a significant portion of society, the possibility of grievous bodily harm, including PTSD and loss of limbs, and their potential future in the work world, men should also be willing to potentially sacrifice their ability to reproduce entirely?" Women are doing the exact same thing
/r/MensRights24/01/13 07:13 AM
2

Men have to meet a higher standard because they wee allowed in combat
/r/MensRights24/01/13 06:04 AM
0

Shouldn't the men also get forced vasectomies?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 06:03 AM
3

How about everyone gets exempted
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:59 AM
3

It's equal in other countries
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:58 AM
1

It's lower because they weren't allowed in combat....it's equal in other countries
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:58 AM
-6

So now you're ok with women fighting? What happened to your boys club?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:54 AM
0

So all those countries who have had females In combat just are in shambles? They have different strength tests because they weren't allowed in combat.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:53 AM
3

Good thing they have physical fitness tests to determine this.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:48 AM
5

What about all those countries where it's been fine?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:46 AM
1

was a war supported by the US and supported on the other side by China and the Soviets. It wasnt a war between two major countries.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:04 AM
0

The threat of an all out nuclear war has ended the threat of a major war between two large armies on the caliber of a world war.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 01:44 AM
1

At that point the US would drop a nuke and end it.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 01:43 AM
11

Because forcing people to go to war is completely unethical and wrong. There is no looming threat to the US. There will be no all out war, we've moved past that.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:01 PM
3

I'm still waiting for someone to prove this. Fine then all the other countries that do.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 10:47 PM
0

I'm only talking about company roles, nothing more.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:57 PM
2

...yes the US literally just announced that. I still don't know what you are referring too.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:39 PM
10

Not having a draft is also equal and a vastly better option
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:37 PM
28

probably because a Draft is a terrible idea and should be opposed by everyone
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:24 PM
6

Israel still has women in the army i have no idea what you are referring to. In 2007 they made it even harder for women to get exemptions and paved a way for more promotions. It also works fine in Canada, New Zealand, Denmark, and especially Norway Australia is changing to make women able to fight on the front lines. Tons of countries have women in combat roles
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:23 PM
8

seems to work fine in other countries
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:57 PM
2

So now men's rights is about equality? Figured with a name like men's rights it would just be about men's rights
/r/MensRights31/12/12 06:43 PM
2

Is there an official feminist lobby now? By cant feminism and men's rights be about equal rights? The fact that men's rights continues I universally shit all over feminism shows that equal rights is the last thing this group cares about. All it does is put two groups who should be advocating together against each other.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 04:47 PM
1

So it's wrong for feminism to focus on one gender, but it's ok for men's rights to focus on one gender? Since men's rights tries to turn feminism into some sort of super hitler belief, arnt they trying to create a monopoly as well?
/r/MensRights31/12/12 03:59 PM
1

So it's ok because men's rights is upfront about its sexism?
/r/MensRights31/12/12 03:40 PM
2

So it's bad for feminism to focus on one gender but ok for men's rights?
/r/MensRights31/12/12 03:04 PM
1

Are you against men's rights because its about one gender?
/r/MensRights31/12/12 10:01 AM
0

I'll agree that it suggest we don't know, but I can't say it suggest its a huge problem nor would I personally say its a non problem
/r/MensRights30/12/12 12:42 AM
3

Can't it also suggest that false rape accusations arnt a huge deal if its 2%? I will agree in more study
/r/MensRights30/12/12 12:08 AM
28

How the hell can something be between 2-90%? What a useless statistic.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 11:56 PM
1

So your first paragraph you say it doesn't mater how drunk they are but right there in the second you say if they are blackout drunk it's rape. So what is it? You're contradicting yourself
/r/MensRights29/12/12 03:39 AM
-2

Those illegal guns were legal guns once
/r/MensRights28/12/12 04:16 AM
8

Kinda like how men's rights talks about circumcision?
/r/MensRights23/12/12 08:48 PM
-10

Fair enough, it's jut your comment came off as saying men seem to be suffering more
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:33 PM
-12

So then you think men suffer more?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:20 PM
1

That cat-calling can make you feel unsafe?
/r/MensRights11/12/12 10:48 PM
1

am i the only one who took it metaphorically? I dont seem them asking politicians to pass laws that make cat-calling into sexual assault.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 10:32 PM
-1

but this person isnt even saying that cat-calling should be a crime, simply that it makes them unsafe which i can completely understand
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:33 PM
-2

except in defamation cases, death threats or all the other limits to what you can say
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:56 PM
2

Almost every top comment is talking about circumcision, hat more do you want?
/r/MensRights21/11/12 12:03 AM
3

kinda like how this cake top is supped to be funny?
/r/MensRights15/11/12 03:28 AM
3

What? How the fuck is it similar to being a Jew? It's banning people for insulting and degrading other players?
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:46 AM
0

so the only time a person can be raped is if they fight back?
/r/MensRights28/10/12 10:06 PM
3

He's a hero for exposing his dick?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:30 PM
-1

Personally I would rather write a cheque than push out a kid, but to each his own i guess. What about those dead beat dads where child support is actually needed for the child? Will they get a free pass?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:37 AM
1

all im saying is being forced to pay for child support at least isnt the exact same as having to carry a child for nine months and the medical risks that can be associated with it.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:47 AM
3

because not all feminists are crazy? its like saying all mens rights activists are rapists and hate women.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 10:40 PM
1

Except for the whole pregnancy thing
/r/MensRights25/10/12 10:30 PM
-6

It's not encouraging this behavior, if you wanna show me multiple cases where women were awarded money to blatant false rape cases then show them. False rape cases are not some epidemic. You are free to disagree with this program, go write your political leaders to take away this funding, go organize a protest if you want
/r/MensRights20/10/12 11:40 PM
-3

Its incredibly hard to prove a rape case. This fund is primarily awarded to those victims whose attacker was found guilty. Its not like you scream rape and are handed 11k, it even says "can sometimes" be awarded.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 10:46 PM
-7

It also pays for women who were raped, just because a person wasnt prosecuted doesnt mean they didnt do it.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 10:13 PM
1

Because shit loads of people take advantage of drunk people and rape them. If a person is too drunk, and your are sober enough to realize this simply dont have sex. As for pressured sex, yea you shouldnt have to pressure a person into sex, if they dont want to have sex then dont have sex.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:39 AM
1

and I didn't take women rights issue seriously till a close friend was raped and was treated like crap by the police and nothing ever came from it. False rape accusations are a serious issue, but from all i know a rare occurrence
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:17 AM
0

Pretty sure as a man I kinda know how it feels. Don't know what it like where you are but I sure as hell am not treated like a rapist or if I'm attracted to a woman I'm treated like an asshole. Manliness is common in movies, books, video games, tv, commercials its everywhere.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:04 AM
0

"Because society only focuses on the bad things men do, and anything else is seen as misogynist" Oh bullshit, look there are absolutely gender inequalities but give me a break, its no where close to what your describing.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 02:27 AM
3

I would, but since you and mountaingoats seem to be going through my comment history and downvoting my posts in this sub, i have to wait 10 mins to reply, so sorry i dont feel like arguing with these restrictions
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:53 PM
1

but why does that matter? Also it would be great if you and Donkey_Schlong would not go through my posts and downvote all my comments so i can at least not have to wait 10 minutes to reply.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:43 PM
1

"I choose to go into a career without giving a shit about what other people think" Yea and a fuck load of people dont do that and are guided and pressured by society. Same way men are pressured to be big and strong protectors and showing emotion is considered weak. Working on an oil rig for a women is considered mans work.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:33 PM
-2

All I'm saying is that a major reason you don't see a 50/50 spilt of female to males on an oil rig is because its seen as a mans job and not a woman's. I just don't see how you can't see this, Shawn you think of an oil rigger or a lumberjack do you think of a guy or a girl doing it? Certain jobs are just viewed as more male oriented. Certain jobs are seen as more female oriented.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:22 PM
-2

So? Doesn't mean they can't do construction or other dirty job. A huge reason they don't I into this work force is because society shows that a women should be the one staying home
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:12 PM
3

I don't see how we undervalue a certain gender by saying both co tribute equally, men may do more dirty jobs and women may do more child rearing but why does it matter? Sorry if I'm not understanding your points
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:41 PM
2

figured, hes points were ridiculous but thanks for the warning
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:33 PM
0

You keep saying men contribute more, but there's no way to judge that in a society. Because more males are in construction does that make them more valuable? Or does the raising of children count as more valuable? Who judges this?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:26 PM
-3

And you don't think that's heavily influenced in how society views those jobs as a "mans" job?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:18 PM
0

I'm saying it doesn't matter what gender does more. Both contribute, both can do all the dirty and dangerous jobs and both can raise kids There doesn't need to be a winner
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:12 PM
1

Men can raise kids just fine, just as women can dirty jobs just fine. Sorry I prefer equality.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:03 PM
0

So? What does that have to do with anything? Society was raised and supported by both genders.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:41 PM
-5

Nope all those things were made by people, both men and women contribute to society and work hard.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:12 PM
0

No they really don't
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:58 PM
-2

"We have VAWA, no reproductive rights, forced infant circumcision (ok thats a side issue but still), fatherhood is all but meaningless in the mainstream, violent rape against men is a cultural laughing matter. I could go on like that for days." There are also thousands of issues that effect women, you still see it as a us vs them mentality and with that viewpoint there will never be equality. We have to stop looking at womans rights and mens rights and just look at simply the rights of people.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:33 PM
-1

Because ladyboners is essentially gone wild for guys to post in
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:35 PM
0

Same reason this sub isn't called human rights, why my benefit both genders?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:27 PM
2

If you think of men's rights and feminism as a war between two sides there will never be equality
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:24 PM
-2

Arguably the reason women don't choose high risk jobs is because they are seen as a "mans" job.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:07 PM
2

What? Because all women are receptionists? I don't get the point of this comment
/r/MensRights18/10/12 05:11 PM
-2

sorry when you said the site i thought you were talking about reddit. As for the content on reddit, your very much less likely to see pictures from sites like tubecrush on reddit because most males on this site dont want to look at other attractive males. Hence why you dont see so much outrage over them, because it snot relevant to the majority's interests. The times they are posted on reddit, its in subs like ladyboners and twox and they have been seen as negative.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 10:12 PM
2

theres been plenty of times where ive seen threads in Twox or even ladyboners get mad over a tubecrush picture. there isnt a widespread fight against it because this site is dominated by men, who dont care about or visit those sites. I also dont know of a subreddit dedicated to male creepshots as well. I agree on the hypocrisy, i just dont think its sexist against men. Gawker would publish any scandal regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 08:50 PM
9

It's not like its only limited to men, they have up skirt photos as well
/r/MensRights16/10/12 08:29 PM
37

Why does it have to be a god damn competition? both genders face huge inequality in their daily lives, in multiple facets.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:47 AM
0

Statistically speaking, most sexual assaults dont happen violently or in a bar or alley or anything like that. So being "prepared" like the for such a statistically small chance is foolish.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 01:47 AM
0

I said 20s as in the range from 20-29
/r/MensRights27/08/12 05:24 PM
1

You don't think being a registered sex offender is a little harsh for having sex with a 16 year old in your 20s?
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:54 PM
-2

Or you know it should be used properly. A 20 something year old teacher having sex with a 16 and 17 year old should be fired not have to register as a sex offender. Just because the media is bias and might label men improperly doesn't mean it's ok for it to happen to women. This is a joke of a punishment, it's incredibly harsh.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:25 PM
6

Pedophilia? For having sex with a 17 year old? Seriously?
/r/MensRights27/08/12 03:54 PM
3

So both genders don't have a disadvantage? Is that a joke?
/r/MensRights27/08/12 03:42 PM
2

what does nature have to do with it?
/r/MensRights19/08/12 11:44 PM
1

So you decided to just skip over the whole part where she says he made fun of her for being a lesbian
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:16 PM
-2

" Anyways if they WERE they would show that on a polygraph test he was found to be innocent of this crime." Oh really? How do you know this? Its very clear that you wont be changing your mind on his innocence, so im not going to bother with the back and forth. But you did provide a worthy debate and didnt result to insutls or downvotes so i respect you for that. But no one in this thread even considered the fact that he could be guilty and that shows me the bias in mens rights that I cant suppor…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:38 AM
-2

See if maybe one person in this entire thread just gave one single though to the fact that he might actually be guilty I would agree with you. But no one did, everyone just assumed that the girls are lying.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:26 AM
-2

ok so 2 victims isnt enough but 46 is? so whats the cutoff 3? 4? 19? just trying to keep track of why witness testimony as you put it is "statistically proven to be unreliable, especially in times of heightened stress" ok so now you say the 46 victims testimony is worthwhile right? Also in the article they do state that there was some physical evidence. So in this case with 2 victims testimony's its a case that should be thrown out, but in the Sandusky case the victims testimony is worthwhile ri…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:14 AM
-4

2 witnesses in this case as well, how many does it take?
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:02 AM
-2

So then you're against the Sandusky ruling as well right? That case had zero physical evidence and only witness testimony.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:01 AM
-6

But it was proven...and if your against this case because it's only about witness testimony then I guess you would also want Sandusky free as well? Right? He had zero physical evidence as well.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:00 AM
-4

So then I guess you don't believe Sandusky was a rapist because there is no physical evidence to convict him.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 03:17 AM
-3

And a lot of guilty people are convicted too.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:45 AM
-5

"Innocent until proven guilty" He was proven guilty....and now apparently the jury system isn't a good enough system.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:44 AM
-2

And apparently that combined with witness testimony was enough
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:43 AM
-3

well a court and a jury convicted him, I have to put my faith in their hands. No on here was a member of that jury and saw the evidence presented.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:22 AM
-5

Because I have faith the the court system, I wasn't in the courtroom I didn't see all the evidence presented. Why are you assuming he is innocent? he was convicted in the court of law by a jury of his peers. There was physical evidence presented as well as witness testimony. If I was on the jury maybe it wouldn't be enough, but everyone on her is essentially assuming he is innocent, when in fact he may very well be a rapist. According to the court of law there was enough evidence to convict him.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:19 AM
-8

I wasn't in the courtroom, it also states that there was physical evidence presented.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:13 AM
-6

and a guilty verdict also doesn't mean hes innocent.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 01:47 AM
-2

well the article states that there was some physical evidence, I dont know all the details of the case, but he was convicted.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 01:41 AM
-4

article states there was some physical evidence, i wasnt in the court room so i have to trust the jurors
/r/MensRights25/07/12 01:38 AM
-6

Well technically he was proven guilty.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 12:48 AM
-1

Nope just posting the possible other option of him actually being guilty.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 10:57 PM
8

All the other things posted are also complete assumptions but gives no credit to the chance he actually raped her.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 10:56 PM
-6

H)he actually raped her
/r/MensRights24/07/12 10:04 PM
2

Generalizations this guy.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 09:01 AM
3

Probably because it was a retarded question.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 09:00 AM
1

Really? Canada is that bad
/r/MensRights25/04/12 06:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter