TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KipHackman Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by KipHackman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Exactly. I think it's ridiculous to even compare the "manliness" of a culture by the limited scope of government propaganda.... but if that is going to be the measuring stick, something like this would be more accurate (though far less convenient to make broad generalizations with).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/14 06:08 PM
3

Plus I don't think the male studies course getting shut down had anything at all to do with the fact that there was no womens studies. Oh no, I understand that. But in response to what you originally said ("If they acknowledge that a mens' studies course is needed or fair, or that there should be no women's studies course, but rather an egalitarian "gender studies" course that didn't focus on male privilege), I thought it was worth pointing out that this specific university does not seem offer a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/14 02:53 PM
4

Unless I'm looking at their website all wrong, I think that's precisely what the University of South Australia has done. I can't seem to find any courses solely on Women's Studies (though someone please correct me if I'm wrong). That would seem to me, in light of this story, to reflect a more balanced attitude to gender studies at this particular institute, instead of it being rife with feminist studies and rejecting all male-focused studies (as I was originally imaging). And apparently a course…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/14 01:40 PM
1

I mean, I can see where Vornash is coming from when he talks about the population being too small to support the amount of people that are drawing and will continue to draw from it (though I think that should be solved through revising the program, not hoping for a baby boom). I based my question off of that premise just to see what he would say... But I agree that the notion that childless people don't contribute in any way to the system is absurd for all of the reasons you pointed out :)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/13 04:33 AM
3

You know, I'd agree that things should be done (like subsidized day care.. or even an improvement in the economy, wouldn't that be nice?) to make parenthood more feasible for people who have the desire to have kids. I just disagree that anyone who makes the choice to remain childless (for whatever reason) is selfish or that a woman who doesn't want to push a baby out of her vagina is failing society. That said, I've enjoyed our exchange and have a few new ideas to read up on :)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/13 10:22 PM
5

So your position is not purely about numbers (ie there being enough workers to support an aging population), but focused more on the procreation of smart, successful people? I'm on my phone so I can't link, but I'd encourage you to read wikipedia's entry on fertility and intelligence. It states that high IQs and fertility are inversely related. In addition, female education levels and economic participation are inversely related with fertility. I'm curious as to how that research meshes with you…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/13 07:53 PM
7

Then perhaps it would be wise to encourage or incentivize people that do want children to have them (or have more). Shaming people like /u/RobotPartsCorp to have unwanted children seems like a dead end, IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/13 06:52 PM
9

But should they abstain from enrolling in Medicare? Even if it was out of their control, they have not contributed to funding the program.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/13 05:21 AM
7

I've never encountered this line of reasoning before and am intrigued. What would you suggest for people who are infertile? Or for those who have a child (or children) that does not reach adulthood?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/13 04:38 AM
6

People get offended when you point out what West Africans are bad at Funny how, historically, Africans were known for their excellent diving skills. It was used to sustain the economy in the Republic of Congo, as a tourist attraction in Liberia, and exploited by slavemasters in the U.S.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/13 02:00 AM
7

I'm sure you've heard, it's purely cultural, right? No. African Americans originate from a region in West Africa. One physical difference between West Africans and other races is their bones are far denser. This is great for sprinting, which is what West Africans are built for, but horrible for swimming. They sink! African American culture is void of swimming because with their bodies, swimming is not enjoyable and quite dangerous. This is untrue. Evidence indicates that people of African descen…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/13 10:37 PM
9

I don't know if that's the best example of the point you're trying to make. The song is about infidelity: "So go ahead and get gone/Call up that chick, and see if shes home/Oops I bet you thought, that I didn't know/What did you think/I was putting you out for?/Because you was untrue/Rolling her around in the car that I bought you/Baby, drop them keys/Hurry up, before your taxi leaves" If there was a post in TRP about those circumstances, I assume the OP would be applauded (and rightly so, in my…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/13 12:20 AM
10

So? Even supposing that the things you said are true (which I don't agree that they are), it's just a subreddit. Do you think /r/circlejerk is doomed because it doesn't have a serious ideology that is going to change the world for the better?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/13 03:00 PM
7

Mm, I'm pretty sure the Flynn Effect says otherwise. I.Q. scores are frequently normed. In general, the entire population taking the test tends to get better at the test over time -- this is called the Flynn effect, and on average we're getting 0.3 points better per year. To account for the Flynn effect, periodically the I.Q. tests are renormalized such that the median score remains at 100. (I know MentalFloss isn't a scientific source, but it was the most concise summation I could find)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/13 04:25 AM
8

No, as I wouldn't even know where to find that information.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/13 03:40 AM
14

I don't believe AcatalepticPolemic was incorrect: I.Q. tests like Stanford-Binet and WAIS have traditionally been constructed to show no sex difference in total score, by leaving out or counterbalancing items that show sex differences. Such tests therefore are not capable of measuring a possible difference between the sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/13 03:26 AM
6

Am I understanding you correctly; your stance is that the majority of women do not support a draft? If so, this poll might indicate otherwise: Sixty-one percent of females say that women should be included in a future draft, compared to 57 percent of men who think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/13 07:50 PM
6

I don't doubt that negs work for some guys and don't believe I've ever personally posted judgement on it? I don't really care about it either way. My original point was that you were comparing negs given between two people who (I assumed, perhaps wrongly) have been friends for a lengthy amount of time. Which is different from negging someone you've known 10 minutes. Or at least it's different in my opinion. Maybe not yours. As for openers, Heartiste disagrees with you. Perhaps now you understand…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/13 10:01 PM
3

I agree. It seems like both sides have terms (and ideologies) that are so fluid that it becomes difficult to have a debate without it devolving into "well, you have no idea what it even means!"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/13 09:51 PM
9

I didn't claim to know any more than you. So negs are not used as a pick-up tool on women that you do not know or have known very briefly? They aren't used as Openers? They are, in fact, used only on women that you have known long enough to build a friendship with (like your two friends in your anecdote)?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/13 09:38 PM
15

I'm not seeing how that anecdote is relevant. Your friends were engaging in banter that they were comfortable with because they have a rapport. Negging is something separate; it doesn't have that familiarity to fall back on.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/13 09:04 PM
4

I think you're right, since it would incorrectly skew the data? Oh, I believe I found the original study, which clears it up: "For disputed paternity tests median levels of Parental Discrepancy across 16 studies is 26.9%. However, being based on cases where PD was already suspected this inevitably overestimates population levels. For studies based on populations chosen for reasons other than disputed paternity median PD is 3.7%. While this is not a measure of population prevalence it does sugges…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/13 07:44 PM
9

According to the most unbiased research, the real incidence of misassigned paternity in Western countries hovers around 1%, with a few studies pushing that number to 3% or nearly 4%. That's one-tenth as common as the conventional wisdom has it. and In a 2005 paper Australian sociologist Michael Gilding reads available evidence as suggesting a nonpaternity rate for Western countries of between 1 and 3 percent; another comprehensive study of international data agrees we can't yet draw any conclusi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/13 06:56 PM
3

Haven't there been studies that show a person in love experiences different brain activity and an increase in the release of certain chemicals? So technically speaking, love exists. Now, if you personally don't believe in love, that's a different kettle of fish and really no one's business but your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/13 05:30 AM
3

The context of a remark is important. This article (which explains in great detail what benevolent sexism is and its effects) explains that: If a woman’s accomplishments must be accompanied by a reassurance that she really was “a good Mom,” but a man’s accomplishments are allowed to stand on their own, that’s a problem. If a man spends years of his life as a doting father and caring husband, yet his strong devotion to his family is not considered an important fact for his obituary because he’s m…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/13 06:03 PM
6

But if men are expected to be strong and independent, why then is there a need to label oneself as an "alpha?" Why not just be an alpha? I think I'm partly in agreement with you that people should let their actions speak for them instead of a self-imposed label (not just feminist/alpha, but in all respects), but the argument you're making definitely seems to be a two-way street.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/13 02:14 PM
1

TRP teaching is that female desires exist in conflict. How so? I was under the impression that TRP's line of thinking is, "male promiscuity is biological. Female promiscuity is just her being a slut/using it to exert power over men/etc" and this book seems to to argue that...women are biologically sexually aggressive too. EDIT: I'm reading the other comments and I think I see where you're going with this. If there is in fact an agreement between TRP and Feminism in what this means, then that's i…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/13 05:49 PM
8

I haven't read the book, so I'm only relying on reviews of it to get an idea of what it's about. However, I'm really curious as to what exactly Red Pillers identify with in this theory since, as this interview puts it, the author says, "I was by the distance between reality and the fable that we’ve been taught most recently by evolutionary psychology, that is, that men are driven to spread their seed and women, by comparison, are more driven to find one good provider, and that, therefore, while …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/13 05:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter