TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kirbyoto Archive

View 0 posts and 40 comments by Kirbyoto on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I pointed out that essentially legally at least women are coddled/treated almost as minors Pathetic. You do realize that gaylubeoil is purposefully incendiary? He always goes for the most emotive/offensive language in his posts, it's part of his style Pathetic. also he's Russian, very different cultture Pathetic. You really show a lack of actual understanding of trp And the crown jewel. "I believe TRP, and I think GLO is trolling, but also he's right, but you shouldn't use his words to judge TRP…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:33 PM
1

Where have I ever given the indication that I hate women? "I don't hate them, I just think that (a) they're entitled harpies and (b) TRP is correct when it says All Women Are Like That" Nice try, dude. the concept that women are essentially seen as teenagers He says "children" in the post you cretin.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:09 PM
-2

It's not literal but a good maxim Plus you see examples on this sub, women today have zero responsibilities You see? This is what I'm saying. /r/mensrights is a bad community because it gives a home to people like you - virulent, hateful individuals who are here because they hate women, not because they genuinely care about the problems men face. You have lost the right to complain about Cosmo when you believe shit like that. Oh, also? You just said "that's an exaggeration" to defend TRP's reput…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 03:36 AM
0

Cosmo is a best selling magazine, i'm sure more than a few follow it's advice I'm sure they do. When you find a community of them you can let me know and I'll denounce it. That's an exaggeration. Is it? Well, let's follow the logic. A big part of TRP is the phrase "AWALT", or "All Women Are Like That". So if a well-endorsed TRP poster says something about women, and people agree, then it applies to all women. Here is a post from GayLubeOil, one of the most consistently upvoted users on TRP, wher…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 01:03 AM
-1

The difference is that Cosmo is a magazine and you're only dealing with its fans hypothetically. The Red Pill is a subreddit, which means I can see all the people who follow it specifically. If I found a woman who was like "oh I love how Cosmo tells women to twist up their husband's dicks" I'd think they were a crazy person. I don't need to find men who agree with the sentiment that ALL WOMEN ARE BASICALLY CHILDREN THAT YOU CAN LEGALLY FUCK, because they're all right there, in the Subreddit, whe…
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:42 PM
1

when she's right she's not only spot-on but brilliantly eloquent and quotable and deliciously vicious. When she's wrong, however, you want to send her to the nuthouse. I'm curious: you realize that she's insane. You realize this. However, you don't think this taints the things that you agree with her on. At no point do you think "wow, if she feels this way, and she's obviously crazy, maybe I'm crazy too???" Instead you think it's cleanly divided between TOTALLY SANE [when she agrees with me] and…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 07:30 PM
2

The whole point of the campaign is to create an enemy group. As opposed to Paglia's article, which furiously decries "the sexual stalker", "an alienated loser consumed with his own failures"? An individual characterized by "animal eyes glowing at them in the dark"? Who can only be stopped by refraining from "bared flesh and sexy clothes"? This lady sounds like the most misandrist woman possible. I mean, sure, she's not talking about "all men", but she's basically saying that "some men" are anima…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 07:29 PM
16

Drunk guy on the street: "Hey, gimme a hug!" Oppressed and enlightened womyn: "Touch me and I'll mace you." I dunno dude, it sounds like she was doing a pretty good job of being Rape Aware and defending her body. I mean, considering that people shit all over rape victims for not taking enough steps to defend themselves, maybe this is what we would call a natural progression? Like maybe you're helping to create an atmosphere of paranoia and distrust when you put the onus on the victim?
/r/MensRights23/09/14 10:15 PM
-5

You can if what those men are saying is "this is how women are". For a community so hell-bent on demanding that NOT ALL MEN be lumped together, you sure are angry at the idea of not lumping all women together. Even though you use the expectation of not lumping all women together to justify not lumping all men together, which means that your denial of the former is now making the latter seem pretty ridiculous. So yeah. Women don't ask men out because they're fraudulent and deceptive. Sure. Just l…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 04:19 PM
1

Which is why we're going to say whatever we like. And it turns out that what you'd like to say is exactly the kinds of things that feminists accuse you of wanting to say, which negates your claims that they're making these issues up. Perfecto~
/r/MensRights15/09/14 11:11 PM
4

¡Hola, compañeros! One could also note, by the way, that all the terrorists who initiated the attack were men. But that wouldn't prove anything. In fact, like the link itself, it's totally irrelevant.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:10 PM
0

I really love this idea that the draft only remains in place because women aren't voicing enough contempt for it. Like it's not patriotic dudes who'd refuse to be associated with such a contemptible undermining of our nation's defense, or whatever. It's just women who refuse to help their sons and brothers and husbands avoid being sent off to die. In any case you guys are super-obsessed with the draft despite it very clearly being a politically unacceptable practice post-Vietnam. Do you guys rem…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 06:24 AM
2

Fun fact: so is the "Jihadis think women killing them will prevent them from going to heaven" idea.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 06:22 AM
0

No it isn't, it's a preferrence. Uh, it's a preference to say "I prefer not to get politics mixed up with games". It's a worldview to get mad at people who talk about politics in games, like how people got mad at Carolyn Petit for taking half a point off GTA5 for bad treatment of women and minorities. That happened. Hey, you want an example of it? Look at the post above us. Look at the so-called game reviews... They aren't game reviews. They are social justice critiques. Does the game get the fe…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 10:39 PM
0

it has nothing to do with forcing a worldview on others "There's no politics allowed in games" is a worldview. "You're not allowed to complain when we do gross shit" is a worldview. I know you guys are used to being isolated and self-justified, but hey, we're talking about "communication" now and you have to actually pay attention.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 09:30 PM
1

You hate their fantasies. Well nobody is asking you whether or not you approve. You don't have the right to police how people think. So who's the one "ticking the cult boxes" again? Also fucking LOL @ your counter being OH YEAH WELL NOBODY CARES WHAT YOU THINK, you very clearly do since you're so mad at SJWs you want to "evict them from the gaming world" What right do you have? Oh, also, are there any "rights" when it comes to interpersonal communication re: electronic games? Which constitution …
/r/MensRights05/09/14 09:27 PM
-1

Sorry, I had to come here just to laugh at something: This is the twisted fucking world they live in - and they want to make every single gamer out there accept their worldview. Gaming is founded in self-indulgent player adulation. That's what you people play games for: so someone can tell you how cool and masculine and bro-manly you are. So you can beat people up. So you can be better than other people. So you can get laid. So people can think you're a worthwhile, valuable human being. You know…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 01:45 PM
-1

When talking about biology, never think in absolutes. Okay, see this? See this thing you just said? This is the exact opposite of what TRP stands for. Ask a TRPer about AWALT sometime. Also, your assumption that women are generally inferior? Yeah, still pretty unacceptable, broski. I don't know if you caught on to what I was doing, but I don't actually think women are inferior or deserve to be treated like idiot children. TRP does. So the fact that GWW supports TRP means that she is basically sa…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:52 PM
-4

nonviolent Oh, my sweet summer child. What a little treasure you are. Violence would get them arrested. What you're essentially saying is that the only thing that would make you denounce them is something that they would never do because it would be objectively bad for them to do so. This ignores the huge spectrum of harmful behaviors that they can engage in without literally putting a fist in someone's face. Now, let me ask you a question here: if you're willing to say that TRP is a valid viewp…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 06:08 AM
1

Firstly, I'm just going to leave this here: http://imgur.com/a/bGiiW Secondly, feminists don't care - they just want to shit on us in anyway that's possible "Feminists might falsely accuse us of rape, so we shouldn't condemn actually committing rape" Thirdly, It's simply a way to view our culture in a different light, and improve yourselves. Technically any political philosophy is about "viewing culture in a different light" and "self-improvement". I don't think there's a political philosophy ou…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 06:01 AM
1

Anyone who agrees with it has never had to kill someone.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:21 AM
2

Yes, this is so grim: Social cockroaches You bring the beers, I'll bring the whiskey, and we can sit back together and watch it all come down. :) I don't think the post-apocalyptic dystopia will have trigger warnings anywhere. You guys seem really bummed about the upcoming apocalypse and not totally happy and psyched about it.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:39 PM
1

Because all that bad stuff like murder and genocide everything isn't nearly as horrible as rape. Here's an exercise: find a single place where I said that an apocalyptic scenario would be worse for women. If you go on the actual rational logic of my statement, what I'm saying to GWW is that if she expects feminism to come crashing down, it's curious that she thinks she'd be in a safe enough position to be watching it. I didn't say that AS A WOMAN YOU'D GET RAPED. I said "it's curious that you th…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:37 PM
1

"What they've always done"? I wasn't aware we had an apocalypse already. That's curious. Well, in any case, your intention to "watch it all come down :)" suggests that you feel safe enough about the end results.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:35 PM
1

It's curious you think you'd be exempt. Do you assume you'd hold up your CERTIFIED MRA card and the post-apocalyptic death squads would be like "oh okay you're one of the good ones"? Like, is this a feminist-targeting apocalypse that you're suggesting here? I'm just trying to understand the mythos and lore of your quasi-fetishist scenario.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 04:16 AM
0

That's funny, I thought Men's Rights was about relieving the pressures of toxic masculinity and things like the Draft. But here you are celebrating the idea of "might makes right" under the pretense that women would finally be put in their place and strong, manly men would be societally necessary.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 04:15 AM
0

Anything from this woman Huh, that's weird. All I ever hear is that it's wrong to attack the person, and right to address the argument. Isn't that why people feel okay citing Paul Elam and Stefan Molyneux despite their myriad flaws?
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:53 PM
-19

See, here's what I love about Men's Rights, okay? Check this shit out: some people would use this revelation as a reason to go "holy shit, maybe our insane focus on violence in video games is really pretty fucked up. Maybe the fact that I take so much pleasure in pretending to cause harm to my fellow human beings is something I should think about. Maybe the knee-jerk reactions that gamers have to any attempts to criticize violence in games should say something about the culture they're propagati…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 09:35 PM
12

IMO that applies to feminists/MRAs/red pills/PUAs. The latter two groups are founded on crazy principles. You cannot be a Red Piller or a PUA without being at least partially fucked up. It's really disingenuous to throw feminists (and even MRAs) next to Red Pills and PUAs because "some of them are crazy, ergo they're the same".
/r/ExRedPill14/07/14 06:32 PM
5

I don't think I've ever heard a positive thought come out of TRP This is basically why this sub is always going to be terrible. The blue pill position is "treat people with some basic respect". That's it. That's too much for TRP to deal with because their philosophy of "self-empowerment" is founded around putting everyone else down and treating them like shit. If they complain, then they're lying about their true nature. Women say "no" when they mean "yes" all the time, and a beta who says you'r…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 07:03 AM
-1

rape people => go to prison ...and that's the only bad thing that happens with rape? So if you don't get caught, it's okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/14 12:20 AM
4

Whenever you're not busy jerking off and showering yourself with compliments. I thought the Red Pill was a fan of self-confidence in men? Or is it only when people are self-confident BECAUSE of the Red Pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/14 07:50 PM
0

I'm neutral and without any biases clouding my opinion I'm skeptical of your ability to self-analyze your neutrality.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/14 07:49 PM
1

Anybody arguing with an analogy fundamentally misses the point of what they are used for. The idea that you can't argue with analogies because they're "not to be disproved" suggests that you believe analogies exist outside of actual logical discussion. Which is to say, you don't believe that it's possible to have a productive, educational dialogue that makes use of analogies, because the usage of analogies circumvents analysis. Or, in short, what you're telling me is that you want to be able to …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/14 07:44 PM
0

but sometimes when a metaphor is rolling off your fingers you already know TBP is going to have a ball with it So what you're saying is, it's your natural inclination to be an awful self-parody, and rather than stopping to consider changing your behavior, or reflect on the choices you've made in your life that got you here, you just let it come out with the knowledge that TBP is going to make fun of you for it? That's, you know...that's really something. you probably dont have an entire sub look…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/14 07:42 PM
8

Rather it would be a sign that the people reading his cartoons think he's an asshole. It would be a sign that YOU think he's an asshole. You would be showing this in a way that is illegal. Any more questions, or...?
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:54 AM
4

mras jumping at their own shadow every time the statistics don't go their way is a funnier joke than any srs poster could ever make who believes in the boogeyman
/r/MensRights13/04/14 01:37 AM
-9

"One may as well bemoan the objectification of the players on a foosball table." So what you're saying is that the entire medium of video games, with all its potential for interactive storytelling and character development, is basically equivalent to a game of foosball. Slow clap. It's consistently amazing how the people who claim to love gaming the most are also the most eager to drown any critical analysis of it in the name of "well just do what's fun".
/r/MensRights05/08/13 12:06 AM
14

IT'S GENERALIZING THAT MEN DON'T CARE ABOUT RELATIONSHIPS AND ARE CAVEMEN WITH BASE ANIMAL DESIRES, YOU FUCKING IDIOT
/r/MensRights13/07/13 04:34 AM
25

"We're not looking for sexist undertones in everything" except for SITCOM DADS of course
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter