TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kirkaine Archive

View 0 posts and 73 comments by Kirkaine on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Thanks. And if you're ever in town, the Oxford Union is a great place to work on those communication skills, I assure you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 01:35 AM
1

Lourettes Yeah, we're done here.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 01:31 AM
1

You know if you can't find any you could at least have the basal decency to admit it. John Major was the answer to the HoG question by the way. Aren't you supposed to be British?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 01:24 AM
1

Yes, and I said I don't fetishise CEOs and communication as much as you do. Go on then, Nobel Laureates.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 01:22 AM
1

Anyone who has genuine drive and intelligence does not need debt driven pieces of paper to be successful. Then once again, find me a (non-peace) Nobel Laureate (or Fields, Turing, Rolf Schock winner) with no formal education, who succeeded on their drive and intelligence alone. EDIT: If that's too specific, how about a President, or HoG of any developed country?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 01:16 AM
1

I'm not sure you know what the word 'impressive' means. Do you find Olympic athletes impressive?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 01:07 AM
1

Yes, it is basic. That's why it's not impressive. Parsing that statement was like Communications 101, you need to catch up (it's important, you know). Also, I assure you that every single Nobel Laureate had good communication skills also How many Laureates do you know? Because trust me, they really don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 01:02 AM
1

networking I think you'll find that being able to hold a conversation does not impress me as much as it does you. Find me a Nobel Laureate who failed out of university, then we'll talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 12:53 AM
1

Decent attempt. I'd change Tarantino to Kripke in future iterations though. As for the rest: Whatever you need to tell yourself to get to sleep at night, man.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 12:42 AM
1

On occasion. It's a one-factor model, I don't expect 100% accuracy. 3, working on the 4th.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 12:52 AM
0

Because education correlates with intelligence. I suppose hyperbole would depend on your personal baseline. Mine is high. I'm happy with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 12:43 AM
4

"Don't do things unless you have a good reason to" is a good principle to follow in most of your life, I'm not sure why you only want to apply it to marriage here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 12:37 AM
3

"Should I get married" is a lot like "should I go to the hospital". It's not a decision to make in the general case.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 12:33 AM
3

The best ones are usually married by their early 20s. Really? I know exactly one woman who married in her early 20s that made it to grad school (and that was a matter of urgency, her boyfriend was military and was getting deployed, she needed all the legal stuff in place). Who wants to spend that much time with an idiot?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 12:29 AM
5

Remember kids, MBTI has 16 categories, so it's 33% more scientifically valid than horoscopes (doesn't look good for Alpha/Beta though)! MBTI is bullshit but kind of addictive, so let's go. I've always scored ENTJ and I'm resoundingly Blue.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 12:23 AM
1

Once again, there's a difference between asking out coworkers and asking them out at work. I've dated coworkers before, but I asked them out at the bar after work on Friday, not in front of the whole room during a company-wide meeting.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 11:21 PM
1

Asking someone out is very different to asking out a co-worker while they're just trying to do their job.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 10:16 AM
1

Not by a long shot.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/15 05:59 PM
1

Hmmm, I guess I was on target then.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 02:26 AM
1

It must be so hard to be that popular and powerful. There we go, the root of the problem. Let me guess. White male, late twenties to mid thirties, at least some college (but a third-tier school), unemployed or poor wage, single. You've spent so long hearing 'straight white men have it easy', that you somehow took that to mean you didn't actually have to have any valuable skills, or actually work hard for anything. Needless to say, you don't and you didn't, and now your life isn't going great. So…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 03:42 AM
1

Hmm, I have you RES-tagged as a political "science" student. That's an odd place to be up on that STEM high horse. So, obviously superior male, how much progress have you made towards curing cancer?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 04:07 PM
1

That doesn't look like any data I've ever seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/14 11:27 PM
1

Once again, 'I'm right, I'm right, I'm right' is not evidence. Data or GTFO.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/14 02:12 PM
0

You seem to be confusing saying something twice with actually having evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/14 01:02 PM
1

But it actually happens a lot, so maybe those scientist should review their methodology or not start with a feminist concept and then try to prove it with biased research. TRP, where the conclusions are set, and the evidence doesn't matter!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/14 12:08 PM
2

I'm a smart, hard working white man. The world is most certainly not rigged against me, and if ever I think that's a fairytale a quick look at my paycheck confirms it for me. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just making excuses.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/14 12:11 AM
3

There's a difference between immodesty and delusion. Of of my favourite anecdotes (and I really can't remember where I heard it) is the one about an old baseball coach hiring a new assistant coach. He tells the new coach "two guys run from home to first in the same time. The first guy has perfect form, the second has crappy form. Which one do you pick?" The new coach says "the first, he knows what he's doing", and the old coach tells him "you pick the second, because once you teach him good form…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 04:54 PM
2

Been a bartender and a salesman before, didn't see any of that. Surely if you're just 'clearly superior' but your female colleague is working harder then she deserves the rewards if she's actually producing more? I thought the 'I'm a genius, I'm just an underachiever' trope died at high school graduation.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 04:29 PM
2

Not changed his personality (which really wouldn't be a medical first, cf. the entire field of psychology), created a situation where he barely had enough time to eat, sleep, and study, let alone socialise. I've given you concrete examples of women I know achieving thing that men I know could not. Have I seen the other way around? Of course, but that's not the point. You, on the other hand, haven't really given an argument, let alone evidence. You've pretty much just said "women are boring" a do…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 01:32 PM
2

I say "made him a hermit" because it did. The guy I'm talking about there is one of my best mates, most outgoing person you'll ever meet. It wasn't hard to see how he changed under the workload of that degree. You asked me to defend my claim that "some of the most intelligent people I know are women". Don't act surprised when I respond with alist of intelligent women (yes, intelligent people generally do make for better conversation, but that's not the point I was making).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 12:35 PM
6

Which is, of course, completely beside the point. The question is whether or not well-adjusted women can want casual sex, not about how nightclubs effect your bodybuilding.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 10:21 AM
3

Nonsense, I know tons of great girls who go to clubs for a fun night out. Go on uni night.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 03:14 AM
2

Why not? When I said some of the smartest people I know were women, I wasn't kidding. Why do you automatically assume my male friends are better? I used to be a research engineer, there was a girl working on some next level crazy complicated shit for another project. Hell, even the guys with Computer Science PhDs who had been working there for decades said they'd never seen anyone who could write code like her. I know girls who double majored in Theoretical Physics and Electical Engineering (at …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 02:03 AM
7

Sometimes, people want to fuck. I can't believe I never knew this before, thank you GayLubeOil for showing me the truth! Where do I begin? First of all "I've drugged myself into borderline sex addiction before" is not a valid basis to show that women don't have sex drives. Secondly, why the assumption that no well-adjusted women want no strings attached sex? How do you think nightclubs stay in business? The fact that you can't find a well-adjusted woman to have casual sex with you says a whole l…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 01:44 AM
1

And I'm from Australia, which is essentially the same. When I asked where you went to school I was asking whether you went to MIT or to Central State Community College, I think that might have something to do with the quality of women you're meeting.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 07:25 PM
1

Most of my female friends are from university, though some are from work. Neither my university nor my workplace accept idiots of either gender. EDIT: Forgot to add, what the hell university do you go to where you can find those kinds of people?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 06:21 PM
2

Which is what I was asking about. As I said, I really can't think of a situation past high school where social groups are that sharply divided down gender lines.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 02:17 PM
2

I think TRP is beyond saving, to be perfectly honest. Though I do agree that there should be more people saying "be a man, don't be a misogynist" rather than taking it for granted.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 01:33 PM
3

But that's my point. Most people acknowledge this, it's not secret RP knowledge. TRP is just common knowledge with a lot of associated nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:45 AM
3

But certainly a red pill man would know better? I'm talking about/to the RP men who personally avoid friendships with women, not about RP men commenting on how they've observed others acting.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:13 AM
3

Doesn't TRP teach that that's what's needed for sexual attraction, not friendship? I'm not talking about "bad boy nice guy" fake friendship until she realises how Alpha you are, I'm talking about hanging out with a woman because she's.fun to spend time with.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:09 AM
2

Nobody is saying that men should have shallow friendships with women. What I'm asking is fan explanation of the belief that a large proportion of TRP seem to have that it's impossible to have a good female friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 08:59 AM
2

OP I ask you this, what do guys gain Staying friends with vapid women were attracted to? What benefit do I gain by having to have strained conversation with a hottie who's only redeeming quality is her body who isn't sexually attracted to us? Why should I take a woman who's "hobbies" include Instagram, drinking & watching trash TV seriously? Have you ever had a conversation with the typical american woman? None. But I don't personally know a single woman who fits that description.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 06:33 AM
4

See, I'd agree with you on that, but I wouldn't call myself RP. In my book, being dependable, decisive, and above all a leader is just called being a man. Not a red pill man, not an anti-feminist man, not a blue pill man, none of that. No qualifiers necessary, just being a man. Hell, just a person deserving of respect, I don't have much time for women who I can't depend on either, but that's a different point. The reason TRP are the only people talking about it is not because they're the sole ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 02:48 AM
2

No doubt, and I'm in favour of men being more confident and assertive (I just wish there were communities what pushed that message as hard as TRP does without all the misogyny which often comes as a side effect). I'm specifically aiming this at the more hardcore wing of TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 01:47 AM
4

You've entirely missed the point of that post. Are you in the military? If not, you don't get to claim the hard work of others to make yourself feel important, on the sole basis that you have the same genitalia as them. Show a little respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/14 09:31 PM
5

Slashdot isn't claiming that the gender imbalance is why Amazon is successful, merely that those are two interesting facts about Amazon. Even if it were slashdot saying it rather than you, it wouldn't change anything. You outright said in your post that you thought that a male-heavy senior leadership was responsible for Amazon's success. I'm asking you to explain how, to give a credible explanation for the connection. Otherwise it's just a fairytale.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/14 08:33 PM
2

It is an extreme example of a larger pattern though. Where's the data to support that? Somalians are not the extreme example of the larger pattern showing that all people are black. Could that be due to the fact that there aren't anywhere near as many female serial killers?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/14 07:34 PM
9

Based on what? All you've done is put two pieces of data next to each other as if they would spontaneously fuse into an argument. Why would a primarily male workforce be the key factor to their success?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/14 07:27 PM
1

A man in charge just exudes the aura of a leader and doesn't need to remind others. Thanks for reminding me!
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 02:19 AM
-1

The business model of RoK is to write about TRP in a deliberately offensive way, so that people will share it on facebook with captions like "Oh my god, I can't believe people think this!", then watch the ad money roll in. Don't be surprised when they try to cash in on news stories however they can.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 05:35 PM
1

Of course not. I'm just trying to point out the danger of using naively (ab)using statistics for this kind of stuff, especially when it comes to intensely personal (and thus varied) things like divorce. To say any more I'd have to actually look at the data, something I'm seriously interested to actually do now. I'll get back to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/14 03:58 PM
1

Yeah, see above. It's late and I'm only half paying attention, SE was the wrong term to use. You're absolutely right about SE by the way. The term I meant was variance. If we take the divorce risk to be y_i = β_0 + β_1*x_i,1 + ... + ε_i then SE is the difference between the true β and the estimate of it we get from the sample. You're right, that depends on the very large sample from what the 20% rate was calculated from. What I'm talking about is variance, namely the variance in ε, which is the …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/14 03:37 PM
1

but aren't sample size and SE inversely proportional? Exactly. And when you're talking about an individual person, your sample size is pretty damn small.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/14 03:07 PM
1

You should have failed (and while we're playing "here are my academic qualifications", I've published in statistics). You're forgetting the distribution of the residual. If the divorce rate for women with a college education is 20%, then (approximately) 20% of married women with college degree will get divorced. This is true. If you marry a woman with a college degree, there is a 20% (kind of, see below) chance you will get divorced. This is also true. The part you're missing is that the accurat…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/14 03:00 PM
1

No, no you really can't. You can make predictions, but if you think that they're going to be accurate enough to be worth anything then you need to learn how statistics works.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/14 02:39 PM
1

They're pretty much the same thing (happy couples don't get divorced, unhappy ones do). The fact that you think that divorce risk for a single couple is calculable from a woman's sexual history and education tells me that you really, really, really don't understand how statistics work.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/14 02:31 PM
3

And if you base it solely on the likelihood of divorce and not about how you feel you'll end up permanently miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/14 01:29 PM
4

Except not a single part of what you've said you want in a wife has been about the kind of person you'd actually like to be with, you've just been describing "the woman least likely to leave me".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/14 01:22 PM
2

They're looking to marry a woman who is content being his wife. Uh, most men are looking to marry a woman who he can be with every day for the next few decades and not get bored of. The "all I care about in a wife is that she doesn't leave me" attitude you're taking sounds an awful lot like the post-wall women you probably can't stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/14 12:21 PM
4

Wow, it's almost as if OP should have made the topic about "who here goes against these statistics" in order to find some interesting perspectives. Oh, wait...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/14 12:13 PM
1

Doesn't the name "The Red Pill" really imply that it's sort of secret, almost heretic knowledge, where only a select few see how society really works? If a normal person is somewhat RP, then it probably needs a new name.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 07:31 AM
1

This isn't RP, this is just being a functional human being. None of this should come as news to anyone. That being said, it should still be required reading for anyone coming to this sub.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 05:17 AM
1

lesbians are simply 'wired differently' than the straight women who are the subjects of the study in question. So AWALT, except when they're not.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/14 02:44 PM
1

There are lots of things pure and simple about assault. I walk up to you in the street and punch you that's assault, pure and simple. True, there are lots of times when it isn't pure and simple, but this wasn't one of them. Using physical force on someone against their wishes. That's as pure and simple as it gets. Good Samaritan laws do not apply in those cases, and they're very clear on that. Reckless rescuer clauses are exceptions to good samaritan laws, not really laws in and of themselves, w…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 06:45 AM
1

I don't know how much attention you pay in law school, but this was assault, pure and simple. As I mentioned in a comment below, take a first aid course. The very first thing they tell you is that no matter how deep your superhero fantasy runs, consent matters. If we were talking about a toddler or if she was unconscious and unable to give consent that would be a different matter, but this is a clear case of her telling you not to do something, and you using force on her body to do it anyway. Th…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 10:40 PM
2

All of that is true. It's also assault. Ever taken a first aid course? The very first thing they teach you is that you absolutely do not have a legal right to use force on someone, no matter how much you think you're helping them. They say no, you stop. No matter what the chemistry of this stuff is, no matter whether or not OP made the right call in his mind, or in his girlfriend's mind. this was assault. Zero question about it.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 02:59 PM
2

Wait, you had no idea what this would do to her (beyond "probably hot flashes for a few days"), so you forced her to throw up. Now I agree with you, in a high pressure situation people can freak out and someone needs to fucking take control and make sure shit is handled. In this situation, you were not the latter, no matter how much you seem to think you were.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 01:41 PM
1

Just about to get into work (can't have phones in my office) so I'll type out a proper response later, but go to YouTube and search "The Machine" by Bert Kreischer. The guy is a storyteller to aspire to.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 11:13 PM
2

Great list, but I feel like it's missing a critical skill. Learn to be a great storyteller Seriously, none of the cool experiences in your life are worth shit if you can't communicate them well. Everywhere from the Monday meeting at work to Saturday night out, the storyteller is the centre of the social group.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 12:39 PM
6

You think that feminism and gender studies classes are about teaching women how to best apply their makeup in order to attract the most dick?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 10:52 AM
3

Point 4&5: Good for you. Sounds like you have selected a worthy partner, and it sounds like you have developed a sexual attraction strategy that can pull down 10's. Which probably means you have a good frame and have adopted at least some of the concepts of gamesmanship. Don't pretend that you didn't go out and use what skills and talents you have to find a stupid ugly woman for a best friend and life partner. You tried to get what you viewed as the highest quality target you could find and then…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 06:04 AM
1

Red pill can discuss and anaylze this in great depth No you can't. "Because hypergamy" is not in-depth analysis.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 05:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter