TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KissesUwU Archive

View 0 posts and 127 comments by KissesUwU on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Which executive order.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 01:21 AM
0

Yes. Thank you for finally understanding my point. I don't feel inclined to read the rest because it's under the presumption that I disagree with your original statement.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 01:18 AM
0

Problematic arguments, they are saying coercion to get consent is in fact rape. This is true for men too. Shame on you. I agree.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 09:40 PM
0

Still waiting for you to justify your statistical claim with a study.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 09:34 PM
-2

Great so you just misrepresented it. 1 explains that coercion is rape. And you have yet to justify your 50% claim. 2nd source misrepresents data. The data only proves that most rape cases that go to trial do not win. This doesn't imply the the cases that did not win are in fact false accusations. 3rd source is true story of false accusation which is horrible. 4th source is a a horrible person. So in total we've got misinformation and 2 instances of false accusations. Good one.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 09:26 PM
-2

That's really not a lie but whatever you say right. Are you denying that the caregiver title is forced onto women? That women don't work in the majority of healthcare settings? Google is free bro. Use it. What I said is factually true. https://news.yale.edu/2016/02/25/first-instinct-women-are-more-altruistic-men https://www.amacad.org/daedalus/why-do-women-care-more-men-couldnt-care-less https://www.artsci.utoronto.ca/news/people-pleasing-linked-gender-differences-problem-solving-study
/r/MensRights29/06/26 09:17 PM
1

Straight up wrong. Give me a source. Weak law enforcement is why you see so much rape. You are so focused on false accusations and not the insane prevalence of rape? Yet you tell me about truth.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 08:52 PM
-4

You don't accurately represent femenist spaces. Reading comprehension. I say that MRA exists to say that men need more advocacy alongside women. NOT stop support for women and reallocation of funding.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 08:48 PM
0

It is very interesting and somewhat satisfying seeing this realization vindicated because she is right. I'm gonna rant. I've been in here for a few years and I come back every once in a while just to see what is going on. I am a man and care deeply about men's issues. But man this extremist focus on femenism is sooooo tiring. Genuinely I've done more for men neglected by our system then some of these people realize and just recently I was called a freaking enemy of men. All because I stay factua…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 02:39 PM
-1

Okay so not gonna address what I just said, cool. Have a good day. I believe feminism does help men in terms of sociological research.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 02:03 PM
0

I'm actually not a feminist I'm just not anti-feminist. I've actually been trying to do that same thing! How ironic!
/r/MensRights29/06/26 02:02 PM
1

That is not refuting any of my claims. I looked them up and couldn't find evidence of your claims. If I missed something then by all means the floor is yours. If you don't want to engage with me because you think I'm your enemy then so be it I suppose.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 01:44 PM
2

If I was wrong I'd be happy to be corrected. Can you refute anything I said meaningfully? Also I take offence to you saying I'm against men because I disagree on your points about policy. I volunteer at a local shelter for men and my entire career path is focused on helping men in the first place. I find it incredibly dishonest to characterize me that way because I am skeptical by nature of a lot of the propagandistic claims said in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 01:38 PM
3

I'm in college. The title IX is not that way for me. But maybe I'm wrong can you expand on that? VAWA and well more specifically the Office on Violence Against Women that came about because of VAWA is funding male shelters and local groups that help men it just has an outdated and sexist name. Women's healthcare stuff is simply wrong because the ACA applies to both men and women. Before the ACA women paid more than men for healthcare premiums. Affirmative action didn't only apply to women but sp…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 01:29 PM
-2

No them acting like men to the detriment of everyone else would still be "toxic masculinity" masculine and men are not mutually exclusive. Also these are the traits explicitly mentioned when describing the difference between the genders regarding gender studies of how they both interact negatively with their gender roles. You seemed to go off on a tangent regarding women who are just horrible people. The whataboutism is crazy. But I agree that shit sucks. Not everything men do is toxic masculini…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 01:15 PM
-2

1 untrue. That wasn't even a claim about Feminism I'm talking about MRA.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 01:02 PM
1

Which laws specifically and when?
/r/MensRights29/06/26 01:00 PM
-4

Ah yes Israeli propaganda. The India stuff may be out of context. IIRC India has one of the worst legal systems for rape in the world. To the point that rape is pretty much legal. It doesn't even define rape as a violent act. So I have no idea what the reprecussions of gender neutral laws would be in their country. They claim that women would be hindered from legal punishment of rapists. You can see general laws and also quotes from lawmakers that claim rape should result in the execution of the…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:38 AM
-8

Its not bullshit and rote. People expect women to be caregivers and men to be leaders. The societal expectations of men and women are both unrealistic. When women try to fulfill their gender role to an unhealthy degree it leads to their own relationships failing. Not because they care too much but because they are emotionally unstable. Being a people pleaser is not being too much of a perfectionist.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:14 AM
1

Only do so when you are comfortable. Unfortunately it's very common in gay communities to find sexual assault due to stigma and discrimination. That's probably why you've seen overwhelming support. Realistically most people who care about you and accept you will be supportive of you is my experience. It's far more rare to see evil people willing to destroy your reputation and tell your secrets. Build that trust with your partner and everything will be alright, probably.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:42 AM
-5

I know you believe this and this subreddit believes this. But it's untrue. This movement was started by feminists. And it persists to say that men need more advocacy as well as women. Not stop support for women and reallocate the funding given toward women's causes to men's causes. Thank you for your time.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:08 AM
-9

I never used the 1 in 4 stat because it's wrong. And never mind how the Duluth model has changed as the science progresses right? This link is a deleted post put great win! And 4. There is one near me that literally say "previously named Women's Resource of area I live by" If 5 links in a row don't work and the only links I can see are Wikipedia articles of events 80 years ago then I'm sorry but you need to update the list. I said many because I've volunteered with a few of the men's shelters in…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:06 AM
-3

Good try again. Please refer to my other comment. You don't have to copy and paste your arguments when I'm saying something you agree with.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:01 AM
-17

Just by reading the first few. It makes sweeping generalizations of all feminists from claims a while back. I don't trust every instance where a feminist says something as indicative of the entire group. Otherwise I'd claim all men are sexist and think women are property. The reason you see earlier examples of feminists fighting for their rights is because they were fighting for human rights. I have no doubt I could find similar examples with most movements ever. Like Black Lives Matter. And in …
/r/MensRights29/06/26 09:56 AM
-6

Unmanaged selflessness. Women are more likely than men to prioritize others and ignore their own needs and wants. Leading to negative outcomes in their reltionships. Typically this results in burnout, resentment, and negative mental health outcomes. So yes, both masculinity and feminity (or is it femininity? Idk) can be harmful if they are left unchecked.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 09:49 AM
1

This is untrue. I'm generally in favor of feminist perspectives. But toxic masculinity or as research usually indicates as unmanaged independence is typically only a small problem comparatively to other issues. The issues have been created by men in power though. Like for example harsher sentencing on men. Or disparities in schooling due to later brain development/puberty. Violence in all forms not being taken seriously against men. Etc.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 09:41 AM
-22

Because this subreddit has somehow lost the plot and United itself against a ideology that largely wants to help them. I've gone at length debating this idea on this subreddit and win these debates with -10 downvotes and it's like watching paint dry. They don't understand that feminism and women on Twitter who say mean shit about men and have feminist in their bio are two separate things.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 09:37 AM
5

True
/r/MensRights29/06/26 09:34 AM
1

No. Rape culture is any social system the enables rape to persist or occur. The legal standard of care is not an effective solution for helping victims of IPV. Most get back with their abuser after they get out of jail and the cycle continues. The legal punishment is used against them and increases the severity of the abuse. Did you like read what I said. Yes the presumption of innocence protects rapists and abusers.. Your idealized version of our court system is not reality. If you actually loo…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 09:27 AM
-1

Let's go one by one IPV and violent crime is not the same thing Not a lie. Link any study indicating that men and women rape at the same rate. You are coping. Men are far more likely to commit severe forms of abuse. Which is indicated by the study you all tout in this subreddit about situational couple violence... The point of the matter is that men commit the majority of murder against women. The majority of these murderers are their spouses. Indicating high levels of severe abuse. Literacy. Co…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 09:00 AM
0

I don't know about violence. But crime yes. Always has been. Not because men are born that way but because gender roles frequently place men in positions to commit crime. For example the vast majority of men believe it acceptable to hit others unless they are women. It is also shamed for men to seek mental health treatment by other men (I've seen it on this subreddit) Men lack mentorship and emotional support/emotional awareness because of the broader societal expectations of men to be strong, r…
/r/MensRights28/06/26 02:09 AM
1

But what if women are getting married specifically to pay for school that type of legislation would discriminate against poor women. And only help those who can already pay. I think a generally better piece of legislation is one that targets the university pricing structure making it unaffordable in the first place. It has exceeded inflationary price increases over time for no reason other than poor management and competition.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 12:20 AM
1

I only was responding to the part of your argument that claims "Collective female bartering" is "a social behavior and strategy of females well before our evolution into Hominids Species" This is factually incorrect. I'd be happy to go to other topics but you can't just ignore that. That being said I do agree. Most concepts like the end goal of feminism is impossible or too far in the future to be feasible to reach soon. So is Utopia. But that doesn't mean it's not beneficial to make policy and/…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 08:54 AM
1

Yes I also don't think feminism has always existed. From a systemic level, the inequality of men and women haven't existed from the start of civilization. The early humans didn't have the incentives that we do. We didn't always have the privilege to let women not do work or primarily be gatherers. According to paleoanthropology it's actually quite untrue that women and men in early civilization have had certain gender roles identical or similar to ours. Women hunted. Relatively egalitarian gende…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 07:41 AM
1

Jesus Christ. I hide my account history because of people like you. You went into multiple posts LOOKING for my comments to argue with me for no reason big man. You are just exemplifying yourself as a petulant child.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 12:22 AM
1

🤦🤦🤦 dude why do you think I'm here... You are purposefully misrepresenting me and my arguments for no reason. I'm not a feminist. You are literally making a fool of yourself.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 12:13 AM
1

When you correctly present my arguments and opinions I will reply. The first sentence you stated is wrong and not what I think. Try speaking to me like a sensible human being. Not a paragon of feminism and what you think about feminism. And then mentioning topics outside the purview of what I am saying. Thank you in advance.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 12:04 AM
3

Often the results simply revert back to before they were married after divorce in terms of psychological benefit. Although, divorce is absolutely stressful and we should be focusing on the mental health of men going through divorce.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 12:01 AM
2

Actually true. It's only positive so long as you are married. Women also receive that benefit to a lesser degree. I think literature shows the lifespan increases are likely due to increased emotional engagement and women urging men to seek help for issues they would otherwise ignore.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 12:00 AM
0

It's not a brainless defense. I'm using facts to determine what information is being left out intentionally. Your argument only harms. You'd rather see this legislation that helps women disappear than maybe advocate for more men focused legislation. That. Is. Wrong. I'm not a fucking brainlet who is going to accept any and all bullshit that confirms what I already believe. I care about facts. And if we are supposed to be productive we should arguing from a standpoint of truth. Do not attack me b…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:55 PM
1

You are wrong. Feminism does help with these issues. IPV work is very prevalent among feminist scholars and you don't get to just say no and that's just what we're gonna go with. You have to prove it and I can prove feminists are doing work to help victims of IPV including men.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:50 PM
1

Your argument against the first claim is to mention other shit? Dawg this is exactly what I'm talking about. Do BOTH. You don't have to make it a contest IPV is more common against women and more severe. That is fact. It doesn't mean we ignore men. I've read the study about non-reciprocal violence. The study uses 2 questions in a questionnaire to determine abuse makes no mention of sexual abuse, limited definitions of frequency and severity of abuse outside of injury. Even the researchers in tha…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:47 PM
0

Like I've said before education is by and far the most effective way to reduce birth rates and it contributes to the economy. Your argument only harms west bangal. The legislation is sound. I already said that they should also address the men's dropout rates. Again. You can walk and chew gum at the same time. I don't criticize positive legislation. I wish for more toward men.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:33 PM
0

Reading comprehension bro. Read my other comments. I agree the dropout rates are lower for women. But that's not the primary goal of the legislation.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:22 PM
0

Something that is knowingly leaving out information or telling the wrong information to manipulate people into thinking or feeling something that doesn't accurately reflect what they would think or feel if they knew the truth. Saying they are giving out loans to women to curb dropout rates is false to intentionally foster outrage. They are giving out loans to Unmarried women to curb childhood marriage/pregnancy and lower birth rates ALONGSIDE reduce dropout rates.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:21 PM
1

So what news instead?
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:15 PM
1

No I'm not. I'm saying you didn't research beyond the article.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:14 PM
-1

Dawg I don't know why you're doubling down on this. I investigated further and found that you didn't do your due diligence before crying wolf.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:11 PM
-1

I did read the post and investigated further which is why you should read my replies to myself. I'm merely skeptical. You for some reason left out the childhood marriage and birth rate part. Which is dishonest. It seems you listed a secondary benefit to this without actually digging into the facts about why the grant is only for Unmarried women. I don't think we have to lie to say that men should get support too.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:03 PM
1

I like the direction you're going but you should try strong arming the feminist position. Not making a definition that is so broad it doesn't fully encapsulate their arguments. It feels like a debate bro definition that seems dishonest. Feminism = reducing barriers and leading to gender equity. They claim women and in terms of research, move on to broader concepts like specific minorities such as LGBTQ+ people or racial minorities face systemic barriers to do things like recover from Intimate Pa…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 10:50 PM
1

Ouu I found a thing https://www.google.com/amp/s/timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/state-offers-rs-50k-for-every-unmarried-girl-in-college/amp_articleshow/131918798.cms It has a picture that's been translated. This effort is in fact to reduce birth rate, childhood pregnancy, and childhood marriage, and dropout rate due to marriage/childbirth. Frankly I'm not against this policy. I just want more stuff for male dropout rates too. We can walk and chew gum at the same time. Hope y'all found …
/r/MensRights25/06/26 10:20 PM
-1

Okay did a little research it's to reduce childhood marriage. I think probably the women were marrying at young ages to go to college. It's a one time grant of 50,000 of their currency. Only offered to Unmarried women. So maybe the rates are different for Unmarried women. I'll be back.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 10:14 PM
0

Also is the goal population control? I know that the most effective way to reduce birth rates is educating women. I just need more information.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 10:11 PM
-2

Is it different in west bengal. I know the statistics you mentioned are true for the United States but this is a different country. Not being facetious just curious.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 10:09 PM
2

Yeah that's absolutely bullshit. It happens to women more frequently and to a more severe degree. But that doesn't mean we should just not prioritize male victims. It's not like a contest to see who's trauma is worse. You treat both. You can walk and chew gum at the same time. Systems create inequality for men too and not acknowledging that makes someone out to be a misandrist not someone who cares about equity.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 10:05 PM
2

Notice how the argument just devolves into laughing at me instead of acknowledging the research backing my claims. It's because you don't genuinely have an argument. How ironic when the comment below says shame and ridicule are the weapons of feminism. "Shame and ridicule are Feminisms most utilized weapons. They will use any phrase they can that they believe will shame those who challenge them, and frighten those who might be considering it." Does that sound familiar? The first study is a revie…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 08:06 PM
1

Are you dead ass. Just because I didn't list the feminist literature doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I listed the consensus but here is some research you'll find compelling. Since you genuinely believe that this shit is the same as a baseless claim about feminism... https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12645783/#Sec18 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9125790/#S23 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11672103/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13059357/ https://www.hrsa.gov/…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 07:51 PM
-8

I just did define how it's impactful. Last paragraph. Rape culture is ways in which sociological systems create risk factors for rape to occur and persist. For example, hyper individualism. Where rape should normally be a crime committed to someone, frequently in the US people will ask what the victim could have possibly done to avoid being raped. You could also use criminalization as a factor of rape culture. For example under criminalization. Russia is a classic example of this. They have esse…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 12:04 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:04 AM
-9

I don't think you are being productive. Can you prove that this sentiment is the most prevalent concern for feminists? That they just simply hate men and want to put them down to make women more powerful? I put that challenge to you to simply show you that it's bullshit what you are peddling. Women are cheaters. Can you disprove that statement? Some of them certainly are. But you make sweeping generalizations to characterize the whole group. Using generalizations like "feminists want blank" or "…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 09:52 AM
1

Trump?
/r/MensRights25/06/26 05:11 AM
5

Free speech is still protected you can say racist bs and not go to jail. Which is arguably far more harmful than feminism.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 04:58 AM
5

Freedom of speech, respectfully.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 04:56 AM
-7

I don't think that's true in all honesty as someone who has spoken to feminist scholars. A lot of their work actually focuses on intimate partner violence. Primarily women. But it's not as though we aren't also seeing these scholars research and help men. One of the best ways to reduce rape is to teach young boys healthy relationship building skills. Which was gained from feminism. It's not always so black and white I feel just because extremists on Twitter say stuff. And no I don't think boys a…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 04:53 AM
3

I'd like to applaud this sub. I've seen us change to more respectable people over time. There was a lot of misogyny running in here a few years back and as a dude it made me a little ashamed to care about men's rights.. I'd hop in every once in a while and slowly, day by day, I've seen us be more than just hurt men with a grudge and actually start calling out bs in our own community while keeping the conversations productive. So thank you.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 10:04 AM
-4

Are the women in the room with me right now?
/r/MensRights24/06/26 10:00 AM
1

Wrong
/r/MensRights24/08/25 04:57 PM
1

Quantify that difference for me with a study.. And explain how that counters literally anything I said.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 07:10 AM
1

I'm straight and I do it more than once a week. And regardless it's not like once a week is infrequent at all. Sure gay couples could have more sex. They also are typically way more likely to engage in non-monogamy. If you have an extremely active sex life... good for you. This isn't an argument for why married couples don't have sex. If anything all you're saying is a subsection of married people have even more sex than everyone else. Regardless there are gay folks who also have sexless relatio…
/r/MensRights19/08/25 06:54 AM
1

Gay couples often engage in polyamory too and there are so few and to be quite honest many new gay marriages that there is practically no long term data to support that claim other "duh, I think this is true" From everything I've read the large majority of Married Couples are sexually active. Here's what we know: People tend to have sex less frequently as they age. Factual. Libido goes down with age and sex becomes less frequent. Married people have more sex than people who aren't married. There…
/r/MensRights19/08/25 06:22 AM
1

Most married couples are sexually active. Women arent these promiscuous creatures you make them out to be. Men in fact are more likely to cheat on their wives. And before you start, no, it's not because the men are sexually frustrated. Although it could very well be part of it. There's plenty of other reasons we know cheating happens. And sexual desire is a very small part of it. Since, y'know they are sexually active. It might've sounded like a slam dunk when you typed that out but it was ignor…
/r/MensRights16/08/25 03:53 AM
-3

See you made an assumption. And that's what he meant. 😭 It's not on me.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 03:51 PM
3

That's not my experience. I've been with my partner for 4 years and we still have a healthy sexual life. Idk perhaps an outlier.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 03:48 PM
3

I mean sure. It's not entirely equal you're two different people. But in my experience and idk maybe I'm insane, the woman is just as excited about sex as me. Like, I'm pretty sure that's normal. Sex is a positive not a negative. Also this insidious woman is just as common as a man who is inconsiderate of women's desires. I don't think women are evil and only go for a mean husband and all the nice guys get left in the wake. That kind of rhetoric is sad imo. Finding women like that is not only un…
/r/MensRights14/08/25 03:27 PM
-11

Man you gotta be more specific. That something else can be insinuated to some horrific stuff. Not saying that's what you meant but just my initial reaction had me reread it a few times.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 04:36 AM
6

I think women want sex just as much as men in a relationship ngl. I don't understand why anyone would delineate men and women for sex lmao. It takes two to tango. In my experience sex is something both people are up for. Any relationship where sexual desire is 1 sided is hardly a relationship. Y'all are just friends and someone has a crush otherwise. Demonizing sex is even weirder. We're all a product of sex. 😭 So anyone tryna make it seem weird people wanna have sex must be some virgin Incels. …
/r/MensRights14/08/25 04:32 AM
1

Sorry I was so focused on the first source I didn't see the second. First let's get to the claim. Half of all the violent relationships were mutually violent. 70% of no reciprocal violence is perpetrated by women. The method also uses a report system so quite literally the participants just tell them how often the violence occurs and the authors acknowledge the limitations with this. "The first set centers around the measures of partner violence. All measures were assessed using only participant…
/r/MensRights10/08/25 05:33 AM
1

Where do they control biology? They are literally studying guys. It's focused on the demographic you care about. Also dummy this is what is called a meta analysis. They are controlling for external variables in the studies that are included in the meta analysis. And the meta analysis says when looking at both men and women there is hardly any difference in the effectiveness of treatment. To get back to your idiotic source. You linked something called an Annotated Bibliography this is NOT a study…
/r/MensRights10/08/25 04:58 AM
1

1st That literally is true. 2nd there are studies y'know what fine https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6199457/#:~:text=While%20psychological%20treatment%20has%20been,2007;%20Spendelow%2C%202015). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3330641/#:~:text=Our%20review%20of%20the%20literature,significant%20gender%20effects%20were%20found. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26291131/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212657023000296?via%3Dihub The last one shows men are reluctan…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 10:42 PM
1

I'm saying there is science backing the profession. You are speaking like it's a friend group of housewives who talk to each other. That is the misconception. Your personal opinion isn't relevant. In fact it's untrue that women during the start of therapy were actually discriminated against. It doesn't have the wrong fundamentals because science controls for gender. Therapy is generally as effective for men than women. It's not effective for everyone. Those statements are both correct. Backed by…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 09:52 PM
-1

I'm saying talking is the solution. And it's not "JUST" talking. Therapists don't just talk they are trained to ask you specific questions and each therapist uses a different approach. For example, eclectic therapists try to use a personalized treatment. CBT is often homework tasks as well as constructive criticism. Humanistic therapy works on making the patient feel good about themselves now. Psychodynamic therapy is often recognized as traditional therapy which includes talking often to make t…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 04:03 PM
1

Talk therapy is effective regardless of gender. it's less common for men to seek out professional help. In part because of the misconception that therapy is ineffective for men. Therapy can be ineffective for men in different ways than women. But not ineffective in general that's just bs. The truth of the matter is therapy simply isn't for everyone. But throwing out the baby with the bath water here is insanity. Therapy isn't magic pseudoscience that somehow only works for women and not men. It'…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 07:06 AM
0

I'd be careful of using this kind of thinking. First off the claim is unsound. Drugs and Therapy do not have the same efficacy. The article you linked claims it's 1.5x more effective. This is untrue. Which is it more effective than? The meta analysis does not find it more effective either. Here is the conclusion of another paper in the same part of research with more participants and is a year more recent. (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-075847): "Exercise is an effective treatment for depress…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 06:50 AM
1

This is a misconception about therapy. Yes there is talking but if it was JUST talking anyone can be a therapist. Simply not true. These people are professionals and some suck. Same as doctors. At the end of the day it's very easy to see from an outside perspective how trivial it all seems. But it's also very easy to forget there is actual science behind it. And it is proven effective. If it was just talking your insurance wouldn't pay for it.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 06:09 AM
0

Mmmmm like does circumcision make the penis look better? I that's personal preference. I mean asking another guy is kinda sus 😭. I appreciate the fanfic of Dr. Evil you're writing though! If it makes you feel better go for it.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 02:51 AM
0

Btw I stop reading every time you claim I said something I didn't say. Unfortunately I didn't get very far.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 02:40 AM
0

Someone just hears what they wanna hear. 🤓 Imagination is pretty powerful though. Keep putting words in my mouth. I like it.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 02:36 AM
0

I just thought about it more because you guys keep replying. I really didn't care. Then I did research so that I was informed. Yippee. The power of human intelligence. I know, pretty amazing isn't it. That new information can inform people and change opinions. If anything the more questions I ask the more nonsensical your argument becomes.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 02:24 AM
1

I'm not making them equal I'm diffusing this extreme language to describe a harmless procedure. Also answer the question I asked. Sure you don't live with it. But you live with the scar. Same as a circumcision. So they are pretty similar. It's just one is necessary the other isn't.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 03:00 AM
-2

Not gonna reiterate my last comment you can stop replying now.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 09:54 PM
-2

Yeah figured I shouldn't have replied. Just spewing more nonsense. Ah good point but we shouldn't discuss it and fuck you. Also your point let's throw it out the window and pretend you didn't address my circumcision is pointless claim. Have fun being ignorant. You know what they say.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 09:42 PM
-2

Considering you disregarded a fact I don't think I should entertain this argument but let's go. Not ALL boys get circumcision. The infant isn't "sick" they just have a condition that may be unknown for example how is a doctor supposed to know the infant has coagulopathy if the parents are too poor to test their baby's blood or do genetic tests. Circumcision isn't necessary. It's akin to Russian roulette with about 49,000 empty chambers, yes. Also every time the bullet shoots the person has a hea…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 09:01 PM
1

I have explained why it's not the same though. Because it's not the same procedure and doesn't have the same benefits/cons. One gives you lifelong pain, one is relatively harmless at worst and has some marginal benefits with hygiene at best. I don't think the foreskin harvesting claim is realistic either. It's certainly not worth changing my opinion over. Since it borders on conspiracy. Not actual practice of medicine. Often the foreskin is disposed of as medical waste. Or maybe used for skin gr…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 01:55 PM
1

This isn't a stone age practice tho. It's a modern practice. So no. Wrong. Also I understand your point, but as the victim in your angry defense of baby boys I don't feel slighted and actually aesthetic-wise I feel quite good about my own circumcision. So who are you really defending here? Those who don't want to be defended. I actually did ask a few people I know personally and they said they don't really feel too strongly about it either. Because I thought, you know what maybe I'm wrong here..…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 09:05 AM
0

Considering you're well read on the subject. You would also know most of these babies have a high rate of comorbidity. Meaning they have other pre existing conditions that make them more susceptible to death. So no. The number would be lessened but not 0. And if medicine got to a point where no deaths would occur would you suddenly believe it's okay? Would it simply be a matter of time you change your morals? I only ask because the argument is flimsy at best.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 08:59 AM
1

Boys have died to comorbidity not circumcision. And it's extremely rare. Complications happen with babies all the time. The reality is babies die. I'm sorry it's the truth. But modern medicine accounts for saving much more lives. If medicine got to a point where no babies could die from circumcision would you think it okay? Probably not. So I think that point is more for shock factor than an actual point you want to make for why it's wrong.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 08:54 AM
1

https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/43749/9789241596169_eng.pdf Does this help? I mean I only knew second hand but here you go. Also I know from firsthand experience that I feel no pain or discomfort from male circumcision. 😀 If the WHO articles aren't good enough would you like more? It's not like there's no precedent here. One isn't the same as the other. Vaginas aren't the same as Penises. The benefits for male…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 08:43 AM
1

1.my point still stands albeit some of it is incorrect. Women do not make laws. They vote on them same as men. To vote on a law there must be support from both men and women. In fact this just exemplifies my point entirely. Society = issues not feminists. While it is true that women can be pro life the majority of them are not whereas the majority of men are pro life albeit by a little. That sway allows some states to barely win on the roe v Wade stuff. Such as Florida who won the banning of abo…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 08:22 AM
-5

There are negatives to circumcising women though like life long pain. Whereas I don't feel any pain? Am I on the wrong side of history here? Correct me if I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 12:26 AM
-18

As someone circumcized because it doesn't really matter all that much. It's a historical practice with literally no negative effect. So no one is particularly mad at circumcision. Except guys here.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 03:48 PM
-2

Okay I put a very wrong comment but I did some further digging essentially. People who are charged with sexual misconduct usually are implicated in very serious sexual assault or statutory rape charges. Whereas student reports tend to be more focused things like flirting, boundary violations, essentially less serious stuff that cannot be prosecuted. The discrepancy could be, women are more likely to engage in misconduct but men have a higher likelihood of more serious infractions. I know that we…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 07:22 AM
0

You again seem to have missed the point, society is created by both males and females. You have, despite my reiteration TWICE, gotten this wrong. SOCIETY ≠ MEN ARE RESPONSIBLE. SOCIETY = BOTH MEN AND WOMEN RESPONSIBLE BECAUSE IT IS CULTURAL. Having gender equality groups is not inherently bad. In the end we all want better for ourselves. Having laws that benefit women ≠ unfair laws against men. For example, is letting women vote a "+" or "-" to men. It is absolutely a negative. Men overnight los…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 06:27 AM
0

Buzzer sound effect I said it's a societal problem not solely men not solely women. You think it's majorily women. Let's break down each of these points clearly and concisely. 1. For example, who is voting on any of these laws. Do you genuinely believe Women make up a larger portion of voters than men? False and unsubstantiated. Lawmakers being women? That's news to me last time I checked 28.7% of Congress is women. I can guarantee you any law created that benefits a woman unfairly was voted on …
/r/MensRights24/07/25 03:49 AM
0

Name a systemic issue that wasn't created by men. I'm curious. Do y'all think judges are mainly women? Lawyers are mainly women? Do women murder men far more? It's not just white knights coming to the defense of women. The fact you can't change certain things is because men have systemically placed value on women above men in society. It's outdated. But to think women are the sole reason that all the boys in my neighborhood said we can hit boys and not girls was created by women is insanity. Gir…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 02:50 AM
1

Then don't get divorced. Marry the right person. Don't rush into a marriage. Ensure happiness. The second you start blaming marriage, blaming the system, blaming women especially is when you start to take your hands off the wheels in your own life. Like I said 90% of people get married. Your argument is basically like saying man I love my brother. I'm happy.... until he dies. Like what kind of idiotic logic is that. Would you rather have never had a great relationship with your brother before he…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 02:39 AM
-6

False. They are just the object to direct your hatred toward. Men have put you in a disadvantage as well. It's mainly a societal problem. NOT the oppressive women making your life hard. It just sounds easier that way.
/r/MensRights21/07/25 05:47 PM
2

Try to find spaces where feminists aren't. Or change how you think about feminists. There's plenty of people here who hate women it's just coming with the territory. You have to recognize people on both sides have been hurt by the other gender. Acknowledge their hurt and ask if they want men to suffer. Usually it's a no we all just want better. Same with politics. Same with religion. We all want the same thing but it's the tendency to focus on the "enemy" that distracts us from real solutions fo…
/r/MensRights21/07/25 05:44 PM
1

As a dude. Guys sorry to be the bearer of bad news but you can be about men's rights and still like love women. People who are married tend to be happier than those who aren't and about 90% of the population will get married. No your anecdotal evidence doesn't disprove that fact. I understand why you are here. I think we all like a good story. But why men should "NEVER" get married while pushing what is generally considered an outdated family dynamic is quite sad. I know plenty of marriages go s…
/r/MensRights21/07/25 07:40 AM
33

I'm sorry if it feels that way. But the stereotype you were trying to reinforce is that women should be afraid of men because men are violent. It's not hard to simply infer what the argument was... If you didn't believe the stereotype then why try arguing with the person saying it's not true? It's like responding to black lives matter with All lives matter. Sure the argument is sound but the way it was used was wrong. That being said I do think it's overblown and I'm sorry if I spoke too disresp…
/r/MensRights29/05/25 06:19 AM
0

On second thought I agree
/r/MensRights29/05/25 05:23 AM
72

Anyone who claims either gender does anything as a whole is a loser imo. Serial killers and murderers are quite rare. Most people die of cancer or heart disease. Not being murdered by men. It's not statistically possible for "men to be murderers" it's only statistically possible for men to be more likely to be murderers than women. And at the same time men are 3-4x more likely to be murdered by another man, the likelihood going especially up for a stranger, than a woman. It's incredible women st…
/r/MensRights29/05/25 05:12 AM
1

It's probably just a bad show lol.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 05:03 AM
1

I'm sorry and thank you for the clarification
/r/MensRights27/05/25 02:58 AM
-3

I hope you can heal from whatever experiences you've gone through to give you such a twisted version of reality. When people understand all their worth as looks and money they will never not be used. People care. But not if you're looking for the ones who only recognize your wealth and attractiveness.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 07:09 PM
0

While I agree about the courts being designed to keep those who aren't guilty out of prison is a good thing. I will not abide by that 20-40% of women falsely accusing their ex of SA. That is an absolutely abhorrent claim. While it is true there is an extremely high percentage of false claims in SA cases (around 10 percent if I'm being favorable to false claims) there is NOT 1.6 billion false SA accusations. Again false claims are horrible but gladly uncommon in the grand scheme of things. The li…
/r/MensRights26/05/25 03:06 AM
67

Um not to be that guy, but you might be the asshole here. So what if you disagree with the premise of the video. Doesn't make you justified in blaming women for their SA which I assume the "women try to wear anything but underwear" comment is. And using your own experience with SA to justify your bullshit. SA is wrong for both genders. Just because women have it better legally doesn't mean you get to discredit women who go through trauma. The act of sexual violence is the problem. Not the people…
/r/MensRights25/05/25 07:20 PM
1

First off it literally says in the post after he got upset she realized what he thought she meant and then talked with him about it. Hence clarification. Second sure I have, I've also heard stories where a married couple DONT feel forced to have sex. So what exactly is this point. Third she is trying to say that she thinks he is more valuable than a shallow relationship like a one night stand or FWB. She'd rather be married with him and in a lifetime commitment. Not that she would never have bee…
/r/MensRights10/08/24 06:09 PM
1

You just don't respond 💀 lest you become an even bigger evil.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 05:49 PM
1

Please point to where it says that this woman even said that she doesn't desire her partner of 2 and a half years. They have probably slept together. And who am I to assume the dynamics of their relationship. The fact of the matter is that is not what she meant and she clarified. The point that you seem to have forgotten. You are projecting this weird insecurity that you're not enough sexually onto a situation where it simply doesn't exist. Like I said before. This idea that she doesn't want him…
/r/MensRights10/08/24 05:38 PM
1

Yeah I knew we mostly were on the same page and I don't blame the guy. I just find myself disgusted by the people in this subreddit. It's seems less about mens rights and more about bashing women nowadays. Just like our female counterparts in r/feminism. Well hey have a good day. Sorry if I came off a bit abrasive.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 06:08 PM
1

I'm not avoiding it you want me to include friends with benefits too? And that'll somehow drastically change my point?
/r/MensRights08/08/24 06:00 PM
1

No one said these things. You're fighting the ghosts in your head. She said and explained she wants to marry him. And that she'd rather be in a lifelong commitment than a shallow one night stand because he's so great. He misinterpreted it like you. She reiterated, and you still are mad at her. Edit: I take back my last sentence.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 05:04 PM
0

Also I was referring to the ugly quotes because she never explicitly says she insulted him. Hence it doesn't sit right with me. It's an assumption. She meant it as a compliment but your point is it's interpreted as an insult. The reality is that it never was and the context wasn't even in a bad light. And again we both agree she clarified when he got upset yet people here still get angry. The quotes give the statement more power than it should have. It's an opinion. On something explicitly expla…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:59 PM
4

Also I really understand the last part. There was a guy on this subreddit once who posted a question asking how to get a girlfriend. I gave him actual advice. And the other men were saying things like "don't until you get a lawyer and the ability to change your locks" like what the actual fuck.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:34 PM
-3

This reinterpreting put in quotes doesn't do anything for me. I'm not going to pretend like she insulted him while she was trying to compliment him. I'm sure the phrasing wasn't even how you are implicating. So "you're ugly, but you've got a great personality" is complete and utter bs. However I understand where it's coming from. But speaking from experience (and I know that's not much) if my girlfriend said this to me I would take it as a compliment. I am in a 2 year long relationship. I trust …
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:29 PM
0

I think the thing is not whether or not they help men, to be quite honest you probably do more for men than me. What bothers me is this thinking being passed down into specifically this subreddit. It's mens rights, not women's mistakes. Also, nothing about this situation even claims that she is some promiscuous person. I've hooked up with people before, and I have been in a friends with benefits situation as well. Does that make me some dirty slut, absolutely not. And this assumption about the w…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:52 PM
-23

Yeah, your guy's take on this is wild. If someone says they want to marry you and not be a one night stand and you think that means something bad idk. For some reason you guys think being sexy and attractive is more desirable than being in a lifetime commitment. I don't feel that way and never will because being a slab of meat is just not it. This idea that you don't want to be a marry worthy person and instead want to be a whore candidate is seriously bullshit. Could she have worded it better? …
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter