TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KitanIV Archive

View 0 posts and 129 comments by KitanIV on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

He was not trolling, but his point flew over your head. Can't blame you, it was a bad way to build a point, but "rape should be legal in private property" was not the point of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 06:42 AM
2

Most women can't orgasm from PIV alone Is that true in the end or just a myth? All my girlfriends except one have managed to orgasm just fine from PIV. No, no faking. Considering how heavy the mental aspect is, I struggle to believe this is the case (EDIT : That it's just a myth I mean).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/17 04:32 PM
1

I know, I was baiting her into making a thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 07:16 AM
3

But that's not true. Genetically, we're equally similar to both. Socially, we only ressemble bonobos for a tiny part of our existence in small social groups found only in the Western world.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 12:15 PM
5

Please, make a thread and show us where in the Western world women are not equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 07:11 AM
6

I will do it for him : Duluth Model. Applied as a law in a country, in example, Spain. Keep in mind that the most important article of the Spanish Constitution is one that says that everyone is equal, independently of gender (and race, religion, etc.)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 07:10 AM
10

just be aware women with kids is about to be bigger. But this is false. https://web.archive.org/web/20151201021903/https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/2015-AHAR-Part-1.pdf The trends don't match your claim. The raw numbers definitely don't either.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 07:03 AM
3

that their problems are not their own but, rather, the fault of an uncaring, unsympathetic world. Yeah, this is true for feminism. How is true for TRP that says that if you fail it's your own damn fault?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 06:58 AM
2

because women are actually more accepting of showing emotions than TRP thinks. Are you willing to entertain the idea that some of us have literally seen a relationship dry up because of opening up without attacking the woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 06:53 AM
3

There are many factors, but one I just thought about is gun possession. Doesn't apply to many European countries where the suicide ratio is the same as in USA.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 06:50 AM
7

Our nearest relatives are bonobos, and they don't adhere to the alpha/beta male thing AT ALL. Why did you leave out chimpanzees? Chimps and bonobos are extremely equal, they started to split recently (in evolutionary terms) and they have a big geographical split (EDIT: To clarify this, Bonobos live only in one particular area, Chimpanzees live north of that area and are more spread to other African regions). Bonobos are also quite understudied compared to chimpanzees. I wouldn't be surprised if …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 06:45 AM
1

You can't have the same rights unless you also have the same responsibilities. So when is feminism going to start with this?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 06:40 AM
7

CMV : OP just wants to feel superior. Relevant XKCD.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 06:39 AM
8

You could say the same thing about .1% of women not showing up for their jobs though... False. Read this. Scroll down for the numbers, but basically : 100% of power plant operators, distributors, and dispatchers are men. 91% of the nation’s electrical engineers are men 97.6% of electrical power line installers and maintenance workers are men. 95.9% of aircraft pilots and flight engineers are men. 98.4% of aircraft mechanics and service technicians are men. Why do I bother anyways. You're extreme…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 08:09 AM
2

So do lots of teenage girls, that doesn't mean it's healthy for their development or that it won't have serious consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 08:37 AM
6

I see. Still no proof of what /u/zoidbergluver is saying. Considering her arguing style, we won't see it either and she'll disappear from this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 04:17 PM
5

There's no mainstream MRM. Once they start getting public funding backing, then let's talk about accomplishments.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 04:06 PM
10

So thats a misleading claim because it implies that women initiate 70% of divorces, which is false. They initiate the divorce paperwork 70% of the time. Prove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 04:04 PM
3

Because they are looking at it from their adult point of view, not from the teenager (or younger) point of view, totally oblivious of the emotional and cognitive development that has taken place with years.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 03:59 PM
1

What mistake? I'm not angry. I just find a lot of argumentation in this sub to be very dishonest. You wrote this, when replying to me, to my anecdotal evidence : Anectode, yes, cause this is anecdotal evidence. Exactly what I expect from people with red tag. How am I supposed to read this otherwise? And yes, it kinda is, because I am not treating my anecdotal evidence seriously. So you're judging your actions on intention, but not mine. How do you know mine was very serious? Anyways, the theory …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 07:36 PM
11

No sane person thinks men are "pedophiles" for being attracted to sexually mature physical features. In Reddit you can even read that girls on their 20s are "teens" and men are creeps for pursuing them* People, especially Americans, do consider pedophilia to be anything under the perceived age of consent (18), which doesn't match the definition of pedophilia or the age of consent (as it depends on the state and country). This is real. I remember it from a /r/relationships thread and I still got …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 07:31 PM
1

So your counter anecdotal evidence is fine, but my supporting anecdotal evidence is not. You see it right to him, not mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 07:28 PM
1

Hilarious. First of all, I was replying to your own anecdote. Secondly : red tag Where do you see it? Show me my red tag with a screenshot. I hope you can deliver or gtfo.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 07:11 PM
1

I'm a walking anecdote about that myself. I was quite left-winged when younger, heavily linked to my victimism as I can see it now. Lifting got rid of both.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 06:37 PM
5

I have a female friend who has the habit of sharing way too much. She can turn off guys in the blink of an eye because of the oversharing. This rule of power applies for everyone, everywhere.
/r/askTRP27/04/17 02:08 PM
1

Because it'll net you nothing positive. Be pragmatic and don't take it too personally. Dating is a numbers game.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 01:25 PM
0

bitches That's a very sexist way to name all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 08:20 AM
2

Divorce, possible cases of being a victim of DV, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 06:19 AM
3

How do you exactly work through legal problems? "I'm a real man, Duluth model doesn't apply to me!"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 06:19 AM
16

False equivalence. One side of the coin doesn't count with the support of public institutions, the media and of anyone hungry for social points.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 06:16 AM
11

There's a lot of overlap between feminists and parents who kill their children. So feminists would stop caring about the "gender gap" if they could get away with murdering their children. If anyone questions my argument, remember that there's a lot of overlap which I don't have to prove at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 06:14 AM
2

I call it out in real life and via FB, but I try to avoid social suicide by playing it naive. EDIT : Actually, I'll give you an example of a call out I did. There's this girl I know in real life with whom I have talked about a portion of the local population that is considered a burden and she had quite strong views about it. When the refugee crisis was high last year, she was posting a lot in FB about helping refugees, sharing links, etc. calling people to be as generous as her. I called her ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 10:32 AM
3

Virtue signalling is a term sometimes used by the alt right to describe those they believe to be motivated by a desire to look virtuous to post arguments. Ah yes, the famous "alt-right" that does everything the left doesn't like. I'm not alt-right (no one is) and I call out virtue signalling constantly because it's irritating and void of any content.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 10:17 AM
2

You leave if you feel like it doesn't work or it's not going to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 03:50 PM
6

Yeah, that's being the key issue on these discussions, what exactly means to be committed for each person. I wouldn't entangle myself financially with someone I haven't been with for a long time, same with moving places. By that time, exclusivity and sex have happened already a long while ago. That's why I'm saying in other posts that it seems people are treating commitment like some sort of soft-marriage, which is leading the "yes" and "no" to be misleading because the same concept can be under…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 03:48 PM
3

So you stay in the relationship and endure bad sex? For how long? What do you say to break up with them? The same you'd say in any other case if you want to say something at all. Commit to someone just to have sex. I don't see the point Just to have sex. Who's being the teenager here. Maybe we're just talking about different things when it comes to commitment and this is what is causing this discussion. I'm also biased because my best relationships came from commitment -> sex (including the curr…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 03:46 PM
3

How is it awkward? Instead of sex it could be many other things that can come up with time. It doesn't make anyone look like an asshole, there are many reasons why a relationship may fail over time and sex is one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 03:29 PM
4

Being committed means you can't leave when you want? What kind of definition is that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 03:28 PM
2

I mean what if you commit then you have sex and find out they've weird looking genitals or something? Then you leave? Why are so many people talking about commitment like if it was marriage where you have to go through lawyers and bureaucracy to leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 03:24 PM
3

That doesn't dispute what I said. You can always leave, before or after. A commitment is not marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 03:22 PM
3

Yes, but it may be a cultural thing. Things usually develop naturally and organically. From what I'm reading here, for some people commitment sounds akin to a soft-marriage or something. I also expect the other person to be exclusive as well. If those women I'm dating are having sex with other men, I'm out and I expect them to do the same if I was sleeping with other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 02:52 PM
9

Why? You can always leave if it turns sour.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 02:50 PM
1

There's no evidence that all life will die. Our genes keep moving on, leaving the meat&bone carriers behind. Are you looking at this from a philosophical or scientific point of view? It's possible that faster adaptation can be counterproductive.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 02:49 PM
1

That's how it happens, not why it's important. We're programmed to procreate and sexual reproduction is how it happens. It is important because it's our ultimate goal. if life had a goal adaptation would be much faster Faster compared to what. Time is very relative. Is a million years a long time? Perhaps for our life expectancy, but compared to the universe, it's nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 02:42 PM
2

why is it important? Because that's what we're programmed to do. The evidence we have of life suggests it is fundamentally random and has no goal What evidence is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 02:35 PM
2

How can you argue that the act brought you to life was not important. Genes propagation are the end-goal of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 02:23 PM
0

Sex and relationships really aren't that big a deal. Sex is the most important thing in life. Otherwise, life wouldn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 12:53 PM
2

Even if feminism didn't exist, men's issues would be underrepresented due to the contempt people hold for weak men. It's a biological thing and there's little to no effort to get rid of this. The "men should feel free to open up" is a poisonous message, because in reality, the reaction is not always what one could expect. Google "Earl Silverman" and read about his story. He really tried to get a man's shelter ongoing and ended committing suicide. He won't get fancy hashtags by famous people supp…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 07:50 AM
3

>low-t emotionally unstable white knight >using a gun to round-up anyone lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 07:27 AM
2

You're using the MRM subreddit, which is that, a subreddit, in order to attack the entire movement because as far I know, MRM organizations do run charities, do defend men's issues, etc. The problem with public fund raising and charities is that societ, as a whole, doesn't give a fuck about men's issues. Plus, feminism does an active work of blocking any help. Just look at Cassy Jaye movie efforts. Her movie is been smeared by feminists who were given a platform to talk about the movie without h…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 07:26 AM
3

That's on you, not on them. If someone talked about rounding up feminists at gunpoint and get them gassed, you'd be having a stroke. Hyperbole or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 07:21 AM
2

Guess which collective tends to block any funding via whining, moaning and lying and therefore deserves criticism from MRAs. I'll give you a hint from your own message : Yeah, good point. I think MRA has legit point, but instead of helping them, they choose to spend more time criticizing feminists instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 06:48 AM
2

If only they build shelters for men... If they had the amount of public funding women shelters had...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 06:46 AM
3

They're proponents of a toxic and hateful ideology that has no place in a kind and just world. these men needed to be rounded up at gunpoint, sent to camps and gassed Easy there on the hypocrisy, white knight.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 06:43 AM
2

Sorry if some of my comments seem angry. Don't be sorry. As I said, this situation sounds like a nightmare and you're under a lot of stress, it's understandable. Still, starting from today, document everything. If you're to build a case, at some point in the future, you must have lots of documentation to prove some of it at least. Gather evidence, keep it all clean and organized and have someone help you keep it on perspective so whoever can help you, will have something to start with. If they w…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 07:42 AM
2

This is a nightmare. On one hand, it sounds like you're suffering from paranoia. But what if you're not? I'd recommend you to document everything. Any strange thing, put it down on paper with the date and exact time. Don't miss anything. Can you write to your former clients? Can you very politely ask for feedback about why they left? Can you also start gathering evidence of everything? Passport denied? Ask for a written reasoning. You find something weird? Take pictures. Do you trust anyone to g…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 05:23 AM
3

I don't see any advice in those two links about recommending someone to fake being exclusive. The second one even says : I know we want to never maintain the illusion that we're exclusive With that reading comprehension, no wonders you don't understand the red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 04:40 AM
4

I see a lot of advice on TRP to lead the women on and act like they're exclusive when they're not. If you've seen a lot, it should be easy for you to find an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 06:33 PM
3

You're delusional and I can prove it. https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=%23killallmen https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=alt-right Look at the dates. No one, except for a tiny minority, knew what the alt-right was until the media needed a new boogeyman in Summer 2016.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/17 10:39 AM
1

I'm mostly talking about PUAs and MGTOWs those are the primary groups of red pillars I've encountered online Creationists and vegetarians are the most common type of gamers you can find in the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/17 10:28 AM
1

I'd have exactly the same reaction if it were a trump supporter who'd been punched. So why don't you? There have been multiple cases since November. Did you defend any of them? The guy beaten to a point of unconsciousness in Berkeley last times. The guy hit by an u-lock in the same riot as this girl. All the bloody examples that media try to hide under the rug. She is : Going to a march that is a six hours drive away having left a meme-message in FB about "collecting nazi scalps" Not dressed to …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/17 07:22 AM
2

They often get stats wrong when it comes to (...)domestic violence http://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm SUMMARY: This bibliography examines 286 scholarly investigations: 221 empirical studies and 65 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 371,600. Rape Legality issues of many countries not including a …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 06:23 PM
1

So you're educating me on the matter of logical fallacies while attributing me a quote I didn't say. I am unaware of anywhere in the thread where I did that. I'll show you : Imagine all the delightful foods you might never have discovered if you had a spec sheet with details analogous to "vaginal characteristic preference." From nowhere in my posts you can determine that I'm not open-minded or that I keep a spec sheet. Leave the objectification and the predilection checklists to women. You are m…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 06:15 PM
1

Unfortunately, you stopped being funny. Just useless now. Maybe material for some cringe sub.
/r/askTRP18/04/17 05:15 PM
1

Your assertion is based on a strawman argument you've tried to push twice, about keeping a list of specs. Is it having standards about women besides available/not-available stupid as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 05:13 PM
1

Let's talk facts. You said : try not to think your better than someone But you also said to that other guy : LOL A prize compared to who?...yourself?...cause no woman would ever think you're a prize over a guy like me. We're not in the same league. You're claiming to be better than him. Explain. Please write at least 350 words to make sure your argument is coherent.
/r/askTRP18/04/17 05:01 PM
1

Metaphor. You're talking like if I had a full list of specs or something like that. I don't, I'm just calling you out for saying that having tastes is "utterly stupid". As simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 04:59 PM
1

it's not bragging if it's true. You may want to check a dictionary.
/r/askTRP18/04/17 04:27 PM
1

Feels good to be useless. And insecure, considering how much you're bragging about stuff and giving explanations when baited.
/r/askTRP18/04/17 04:22 PM
1

Are you advocating having no standards at all and appreciate "all beauty"? I can't help having predilections on which kind of meal I'm going to eat.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 04:22 PM
3

So you're a guy with no options who takes what he can. That's the source of your """argument""" as I see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 03:31 PM
3

cause no woman would ever think you're a prize over a guy like me. We're not in the same league. But to consider yourself more valuable than someone else, good luck with that mentality in life You're a funny at least. Useless, but funny.
/r/askTRP18/04/17 02:26 PM
3

So it's utterly stupid to have tastes?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 02:18 PM
2

Here we have a poster proving OP's point accidentally.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 02:11 PM
5

Did those newspapers mention she was carrying an empty bottle as a weapon?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 06:29 AM
6

Because of this. She was armed with an empty bottle. Let's not forget she implied she was going to engage in violence in her FB before this and that she justified the usage of explosive devices during that same riot (before getting​ punched).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 06:27 AM
4

She was carrying a bottle that fell before the punch. Take a look. I patiently await to see your own hamster in action.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 06:24 AM
1

Im curious though, with this philosophy on marriage what about children? Do most red pill men not want a family? I've become too selfish to want children. I'm always having things happening in my life and most of it would be gone if I had children. It'd be a difference experience, but right now, I like having the possibility to constantly engage in new things, build long term plans, accomplish them, etc. I'm LTR oriented, but I won't get married. I want to know that each part can just step out a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 11:09 AM
0

Lucky me. Yeah, you're lucky you got those strawman at hand to make an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/17 09:23 AM
1

I didn't respond to enough of your points. You didn't respond to the non-convenient ones, including the main one, the one replying to the OP. Go take a look at Civilization and Its Discontents (a summary or something) and see how it matches the OP. As easy as that. But I won't bother any more.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/17 09:31 PM
2

And you ignore everything else. Fuck off.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/17 09:24 PM
2

By who? Who uncritically uses Piaget? Answer: no one -- because everybody knows the theory is flawed. Again, just because something is ''used'' does not mean it has not been debunked. It's just still sometimes useful as a concept. They are widely used by everyone who works in the field of cognitive development. If something is debunked, then why it's not replaced? It's not just the concept, the specifics are used. There's no replacement theory, it's improvements based on Piaget at most. The four…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/17 09:20 PM
2

Discontent of Civilization is basically the answer to this thread though. If subconscious mind or defensive mechanisms were debunked, they would not be used at all. Also Evolutionary Psychology is a field full of weeds and very few flowers. Compared to what? Sociology? Even Piaget's stage of development have partial basis on evolutionary psychology and his theories, while far from perfect, are still used to explain the cognitive development during out entire life.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/17 09:04 PM
6

That body is perfection. No sandwiches required unless it fits her macros.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/17 08:55 PM
2

Freud has been thoroughly debunked, just FYI. Interesting ideas, but not many that stand up to close examination over time. No, he hasn't. Defensive mechanisms are still a staple in modern psychology. We can't really think about the human mind without the concept of unconscious. His work on the Discontent of Civilization is one of the bases of Evolutionary Psychology. His work on dream work is also quite useful, although not as much as the other aspects. Freud has suffered a lot of revisionism a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/17 08:52 PM
1

What? I was just saying that fuck anyone who can't learn things on their own. Let's pat ourselves in the back, you and me, because we're the cool ones who can.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 03:51 PM
1

I'm not a red piller and the smug people that I see in this sub are all bloopers, who have all their life figured out. If you did, you wouldn't come here to brag.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 03:50 PM
14

Like $5* to normal people. These people are disgustingly rich.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/17 12:50 PM
2

When a meeting by the manosphere is led by a man who spent years in prison for torturing and murdering a woman maybe your giant straw man will start to resemble something of an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 10:44 AM
8

Most people are actually able to figure out how to get laid and how to have normal relationships on their own, Fuck those who can't though. Fuck anyone who wants to do anything to improve their lives I say!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 10:42 AM
3

It's not working for me either, but know-your-meme has it : http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/oh-joy-sex-toys-cuck-comic
/r/TheRedPill07/04/17 04:59 AM
1

No problem. It got a chuckle out of me when I read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 03:29 PM
2

Read my edit. I'm 100% honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 03:26 PM
2

The echoes are used to mark Jewish people or their influence. Nobody actually (((loves))) the color of someone's hair or their organizational skills or the shape of the their calves. What you're basically saying here is that you're implying that love, as you're talking about it, is a Jewish invented concept (with a negative intention). Managed to find the wiki article.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 03:23 PM
1

Should I edit them out? Yeah, unless you want to be considered to be anti-semite.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 03:15 PM
9

It's about positive female empowerment Nothing says empowerment more than forcing companies to have women into roles they, apparently, can't get on their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 10:55 AM
1

? You literally wrote : all they need to do is go find a prostitute.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/17 10:37 AM
1

Incels are not feeling how they feel because of the lack of physical sex. It's about feeling like desired people who are intimate with a woman. You can argue how everything they do is the wrong way or whatever, but a prostitute wouldn't make things any better for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/17 08:07 AM
6

You already know the answer. Next (she has already nexted you).
/r/askTRP01/04/17 10:38 AM
5

They seem like outstanding individuals.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 12:47 PM
36

He becomes unstable She left at night, came back next morning to say goodbye and got stabbed. So he didn't become unstable in that moment, he planned it. First degree murder is life sentence in Florida?
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 06:06 PM
1

You are really just unable to confront my statements. Fascinating.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 03:59 PM
1

It amazes me that you RP idiots You're fascinating. You said this two hours ago : but I think it's rude and the basic assumptions that underpin it are unfounded. I told you that you're the one with the assumptions and you go and say this : If you go around calling women sluts then you need to develop thicker skin. I don't do this. Are you a bot or just very dense? You have no idea how to engage in a debate and you certainly have no business calling other people idiots or talking about being very…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 02:37 PM
1

I'm not sure what you want me to say How is "Fuck sluts, but don't LTR them" criticism of sluts. but I think it's rude and the basic assumptions that underpin it are unfounded. You're the only one who's been rude (include personal attacks) and filling his arguments with assumptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 01:36 PM
1

You didn't address what I wrote. I'm not even defending that statement from a personal point of view and I haven't shared how I see this myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 05:31 AM
1

Let's put the word aside. Where's the criticism in "Fuck sluts, but don't LTR them".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 07:32 PM
1

But I'm not a hypocrite, so I can't concede or stop being one. I haven't made an argument. That's true. You still haven't made a single argument in a subreddit dedicated to debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 07:15 PM
1

So I fail to see how this makes the belief hypocrisy still. "Fuck sluts, but don't LTR them". Where's the criticism? Linking to rationalwiki (lol) is not an argument and you've proven incapable of making one.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 05:57 PM
1

If someone wants to sit on a couch playing video games or watching the Real Housewives while their spouse works their ass off in both their job and in the house, that's hypocrisy. Why? You're changing the meaning of the word. If someone is unattractive, doesn't work on their looks and wants to date a model, that's hypocrisy. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 05:42 PM
1

the practice of claiming to have higher standards or more noble beliefs than is the case. Let's go with the definition then. What is this noble belief you're talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 05:41 PM
1

If she's attractive herself then that's not hypocritical then. If she's not attractive, she can still be attracted to who she's attracted to, but she might expect to be single for a while if she wants a male model. If she's attractive, it's not hypocritical. If she's not attractive...you move the goalposts. If she's a gold digger who just wants a rich husband to buy her everything without doing a bit of work, that's hypocritical. But if she's also willing to work around the house then that's not…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 04:48 PM
1

Why would I be surprised? I don't care who marries whom. I respect choices even when I'm on the short-end of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 04:45 PM
1

I am not emotionally impacted by this Of course not. End of discussion. There is nothing you can say that will change that. You either have to admit that you're a hypocrite, or stop behaving like a hypocrite. There is no other valid position to take. I don't have to admit a thing because I'm not a hypocrite. I don't criticize "sluts" for doing whatever they want to do. I'll criticize you for being such a terrible debater though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 04:44 PM
5

So you're seriously comparing a woman expressing a preference for someone slightly taller to her with calling women sluts, advocating fucking them, plating them, pumping them and dumping them, and then deeming them to be worthless if they've had a certain number of sexual partners? Yeah. With a caveat though : You have stated one thing incorrectly there. If you can't spot it it means you don't understand this argument at all, which should be clear from the beginning already. I've already said pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 01:51 PM
5

You obviously do not. So when a woman wants a tall man, she's being an hypocrite? After all, she may not have the same height, how can she want a man who is tall than her? What about a woman without a career that wants a man with career? It amazes me that you RP idiots will get into a conversation with someone way smarter than you, and you actually think you have some sort of valid philosophy that isn't completely full of holes. It's quite incredible. Where's that person smarter than me? I only …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 01:25 PM
3

I've pointed this out numerous times with zero success at getting anyone to see the bleeding obvious. Probably because you're wrong on two accounts : 1) You consider men and women to be the same. 2) There's no condemnation of any sorts. There's "fuck sluts, but don't LTR them". Also, who has done the misleading?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 04:32 AM
2

At the time I'm writing this reply to you, I see a total of two red flairs (and they are not even TRPers) and lots of blue ones. Big "hmm" indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 05:26 PM
10

If right wingers would talk like adults and if they didn't generalize vast swaths of the population with a strawman they created in their head they wouldn't get called out for being bigots. ...and you said this with zero hint of irony or self-awareness. Bravo.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 12:43 PM
2

It was a /pol/ job for the most part.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 12:41 PM
2

the donald. The epic trolling of Shia LaBeouf Uh. It wasn't T_D doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 10:21 AM
1

Victoria Justice That's basically the only girl that comes to my mind when people ask for celebrities they would bang.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 10:20 AM
13

Nobody else gives a shit. Mind explaining why lack of sexual success is the to-go insult against men then?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 10:03 AM
5

A quick example of this. Find any example of story, picture, video or whatever of a man being "oblivious" to a woman flirting or showing interest. The vast majority of times people, men and women, will assume that he's being socially inept, doesn't understand women, etc. but rarely you'll see someone stating that it's possible that he's just being nice instead of outright rejecting her advances.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/17 06:31 PM
2

Seeing as you're a mind-reader who can also predict the future, go with whatever you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 01:12 PM
2

"Yet" doesn't imply it's going to happen. You can keep on whining before anything happens though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 01:07 PM
5

They haven't done anything yet though. You're protesting before anything is being done, no matter who was hired. I'm calling out Saudi Arabia and Hillary because it's related to the match. This is a "waahhh we lost" march.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 12:39 PM
6

I'm not even American, but come on : Because Trump's totally not going to make it harder to get an abortion, or attack LGBT rights. Trump with the flag and Trump about bathrooms. Hillary some years ago. Hillary's links to Saudi Arabia are many, and as you probably know, LGBT rights in Saudi Arabia are not at a very high point. Abortion? Trump said that the law has to be followed, he didn't specify anything about making abortion harder to get. There may be a time where Trump does both, make it ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 10:41 AM
1

The best female Street Fighter player(s) is(are) also MtF.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 04:01 PM
3

But Final Fight added a twist, when your main villian was suppossed to be female. But what happened? Apperantly it promotes violence against women, so they rewrote the whole character to be transgender. That's a rather simplified version of it, because as that video said, the initial draft had Roxy and Poison as "newhalf" (Japanese for transgender), so if they changed her to be a transgender to avoid having a female as villain or was the initial concept is rather in the dark. Poison is the most …
/r/MensRights24/08/14 06:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter