~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThey didn’t. I just pointed out the obvious for anyone actually engaging in good faith. You don’t need a spokesperson to recognize inconsistency you just need to be willing to acknowledge it instead of deflecting with sarcasm every time the logic doesn’t go your way. And stop using straw man wrong. It's just sad. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/05/25 11:39 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADWe’ as in anyone paying attention to the conversation in good faith and understands how conversations about how n-counts actually work. The whole point of n-count debates is how those numbers are perceived, what they say about someone, whether they matter in dating, and how people apply different standards depending on gender or sexual history. So no, it’s not just ‘math’ and there’s no universal 'we' that decided it has to be. People bring in different angles judgment, hypocrisy, standards, and… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/05/25 11:05 PM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADYou're not correcting definitions. You're hiding behind them. We all know n-count is commonly used to refer to someone's sexual history, whether that's expressed as a number or not. You accepted a post about a song with no number, no math, just implied promiscuity because it 'felt' like n-count to you. But now you're pretending that unless numbers are used, a question about someone's dating preferences based on past partners is somehow irrelevant? If we can talk about a song implying promiscuity… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/05/25 10:35 PM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI’m just connecting the dots you’re ignoring. I’m not trying to turn this into about judging people. I’m pointing out your hypocrisy. Even if you claim n-count isn’t about judgment, it still involves evaluating someone’s past whether it’s numbers or who they’ve been with. That’s a value judgment, no matter how you frame it. You keep insisting that n-count only applies when someone literally states a number. Then you say nothing to a post about a song that has no numbers, no math, just the vibe o… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/05/25 09:50 PM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD“It’s about n-count. It’s not difficult. It’s Math, bro.” Cool, then explain how judging someone for having slept with men isn’t about their number or type of past partners. You keep saying “It’s just math,” but somehow ignore the fact that math only matters because people judge what the numbers mean. If it were just math, no one would care. So no I’m not moving goalposts. I’m pointing out what the goal actually is. N-count isn’t just a number on a spreadsheet. It’s about how people react to som… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/05/25 08:41 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADWhether you’re dating or just hooking up, people still judge others based on their sexual history. That’s what N-count is all about the number of people someone has been with, and how that affects their dating life. So, when people avoid dating bisexual men because of their past with other men, it’s still about sexual history, which ties directly into N-count, even if it’s not about a specific number. If you're going to let a song about promiscuity slide as relevant to n-count. Then why is the q… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/05/25 08:23 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADFalse Dichotomy. Oh, you’re right dating and sex are two separate things with no relevance. Like how eating and hunger are totally unrelated. Jesus titty fucking Christ. Do you know what the definition of insanity is? Okay alright. You win. You completely dismantled my point. I foolishly thought sexual history had something to do with N-count—but nope, you showed me. What was I thinking? You’re right. I’m wrong. You’re the thread champion. Debating isn’t about truth. It’s about winning and inter… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/05/25 07:45 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADJudging someone for who they've slept with is judging their sexual history which is exactly what n-count is. You’re just hiding behind technicalities to avoid the actual point. Strawman, moving the goalposts, equivocation... At this point, all you’re doing is speedrunning logical fallacies like there’s a prize for it. I’m actually getting secondhand embarrassment watching you flail around trying to twist this. It’s like arguing with someone who’s already been KO’d but keeps standing up asking wh… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/05/25 06:59 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADRight, because unless someone’s shouting "how many bi guys have you slept with?" into a megaphone, there's no relevance or connection to n-count. Incredible logic. Almost like you're allergic to nuance or just really committed to dodging.. Keep pretending context doesn’t exist. If your only counter is nitpicking phrasing instead of addressing the point, that’s not a win that’s avoidance. You're not arguing in good faith you're just playing dumb to dodge a point you can't refute. Anyone who reads… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/05/25 06:32 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADYou're intentionally ignoring context to avoid the point. The question wasn't just a random 'Why don’t you date bisexual men?' in a vacuum. The implication is clear people avoid bisexual men because of their past sexual experiences with men, just like some straight women are judged for their number of partners. That is literally about sexual history which includes n-count. If you’re only willing to acknowledge n-count when someone spells out a number, you’re not debating in good faith you're gat… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/05/25 04:57 AM |
| 6 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADYou keep saying it’s not about N-count like that makes the point disappear. But here’s the reality. I referenced the number of people someone has slept with. That’s the literal definition of n-count. It's pointed out how some people criticize men for caring about a woman’s sexual past, while simultaneously judging bisexual men for their sexual past. That’s a clear double standard, and it absolutely falls under the topic of sexual history and n-count. You can call it a stretch or ‘off-topic’ all … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/04/25 09:12 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADYou're clinging to technicalities because you don’t want to engage with the hypocrisy being pointed out and that says more than anything else. N-count = how many people someone has slept with. The original post questioned why some women criticize men for caring about a woman’s N-count while they themselves judge bisexual men for their sexual past. That’s clearly a conversation about sexual history, which is what N-count discussions are rooted in. You're trying to act like asking ‘Why don’t you d… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/04/25 03:58 PM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI laterally just proved it was about n-count. "You see some straight women criticize straight men for being overly concerned with a woman's sexual past. Like the number of the people they have slept with." "Like the number of the people they have slept with." = N - Count. Explain to me how "the number of people they have slept with" isn't N-Count. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/04/25 03:20 PM |
| 4 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADYou know what let me explain exactly what his question has to do with N-Count. You see some straight women criticize straight men for being overly concerned with a woman's sexual past. Like the number of the people they have slept with. At the same time, those same women might avoid dating bisexual men, possibly because they’ve had past sexual experiences with men. Even if that past is irrelevant to their relationship now. Instead of trying to add to the debate you dismiss it and try to shut it … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/04/25 07:22 AM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADSo if he posted "why do you avoid having sex with bisexual men?" instead. Would the question be about n-count then? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/04/25 04:07 AM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADDating doesn't involve sex? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/04/25 02:56 AM |
| 4 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADNo it's because any question people who believe n-count doesn't matter can't refute you say "what does this have to do with n-count." That's what I was trying to get at. Seen you do it for a long time and it gets old. Go ahead and keep passively aggressively insulting my intelligence like a typical Redditor. Instead of debating the original poster's question. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/04/25 12:24 AM |
| 3 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADOkay so a questions about preferences and sexual history aren't about n-count. but posting a song about being promiscuous is about n-count. okay got it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/04/25 10:47 PM |
| 4 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADwhat do that have to do with n count? edit: I just find it strange how you figure this has nothing to do with n-count but posting about a song does. Maybe you can explain the difference. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/04/25 07:19 PM |
| 3 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADWhy didn't you ask this to the person who posted about a Nelly Furtado song? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/04/25 02:26 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter