| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | It's not women and children first anymore.Your point? No, there is no point to prove here. Logically speaking, it doesn't make sense. Your judgement is the following: whoever has more potential future needs to live first. But you are forgetting about something: people who will and can reproduce themselves have a more potential future since they are going to have children, children who are not born yet, and those children are going to have a more potential future than the ones who are still alive. See, an adult willing to have children i… | /r/MensRights | 12/02/24 02:01 PM |
| 0 | It's not women and children first anymore.In this situation, someone is inevitably going to die. It doesn't matter what you do. You just feel morally superior because you let someone who has potentially less future than other people die. I imagine you will feel way better if you let a 19 years old boy die over a 13 years old boy just because the 13 years old boy has... potentially 6 years more to live. Where is the reason and the moral superiority behind all this? With such a teeny tiny mind, you will never be able to call yourself an o… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/24 10:37 PM |
| 0 | It's not women and children first anymore.In my experience, people who think they are better than others end up not being better than others. Really a nice way to show your superiority, with insults and aggressiveness. This is what I'm talking about, self-righteousness will always lead to hypocrisy. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/24 02:11 PM |
| 1 | It's not women and children first anymore.No, you need to stop assuming things and you need to stop with your aggressive behavior. doesn't mean they have more possibilities to change it. And finally: speaking about the future, the potential baby I'm going to have once I leave this boat will have more future than any kid who has ever been born yet (following the previous logic, I'm still the future). This was only introduced because of the sake of the argument, not that i ever want to have children. Do not assume i hate children, chemist… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/24 10:43 PM |
| 1 | It's not women and children first anymore.that hates children When did i say i hate children? because you never managed to find anyone that would deal with your bullshit wait what?... are you going full aggressive because you have a different opinion than me? | /r/MensRights | 10/02/24 10:07 PM |
| 1 | It's not women and children first anymore.you could have just disagree with me and leave it like that. But you had to insult me. Insulting people who have different perspective, experience and opinions than you doesn't make you better than me. I pretty much doubt my arguments are weak, of course there are some points weaker than others, but weak overall? don't think so. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/24 10:05 PM |
| 16 | It's not women and children first anymore.I don't like children. I'm 22, I'm the future just like any child. Maybe you're not "the future" once you're close to retirement, I guess. But other than that, if you still contribute to society and change it, and still will in the next 10 years or more, you're still the future. Just because someone is more likely to have more future doesn't mean they are worth more. And it doesn't mean they have more possibilities to change it. And finally: speaking about the future, the potential baby I'm goin… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/24 12:23 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter