TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Klaytonell_v2 Archive

View 0 posts and 8 comments by Klaytonell_v2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

The only idea you defend is that logic has to be perfect and can always be taken out of context. So keep deflecting and don't actually engage with any of the information I've linked or explained - because, you know, logic! No reason to engage the facts when you can take my statement out of context and say racist.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 07:00 PM
0

Obviously not. But the societal history of each group is far different and extremely complex so its impossible to apply the same ideas to each group. You have to find solutions that are applicqble and specific to each group.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 06:01 AM
2

More recent source. Although the old one is undoubtably still valid becase the status quo is not that far from 1998. Check the middle. The findings say there is no clear indicator of why any group assaults. Meaning 'nice guy' characteristics are no more rare than any others. I believe it is important to inform anyone of aparent dangers to them. I also believe being able to protect yourself is important, so sure.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 03:16 AM
-1

I defended my logic in this scenario and provided direct statistical data on the trends. Taking logic to its extremes will always be bad. Based on the data collected in 1998, 2.7m men and 17.7m women were assaulted. Somehow I'm not seeing how your prison argument is relevent. Men are victims of rape from other men. That's a reason to stay safe.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 02:06 AM
1

2.7m men and 17.7m women had been victims of sexual assault in 1998. I mean; inform people of dangers they might encounter. That lets them prepare for it.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 01:52 AM
-2

Source: It's not a fallacy. All of those are examples of experiences that require prior knowledge. The test is irrelevent because practice, which is synonomous with prior knowledge, is necessary to be safe. So even if there wasnt a test people would prepare. It does not increase the victim mentality. People dont leave gun safety courses feeling afraid of guns or even other people that have them. Instead, they feel confident using the gun responsibly and safely. Additionally, it's dangerous NOT w…
/r/MensRights27/05/18 12:35 AM
0

You're missing the point. I would NEVER expect any of my friends to rape or assault a girl, but who the fuck expects their friends to be rapists; nobody. Somehow rape still happens even though you seem to think 'nice guys' really don't hurt women.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 10:20 PM
-12

Prior knowledge of things youre involved in can stop you from getting hurt. I have provided statistical proof that women experience rape/sexual assault far more often than men, and analysis of sexual assault perpetrators based on 150 reports of sexual violence that FAILED to find a clear identifier for rapists. A null hypothesis is still a result and can still be learned from. All the conclusion teaches is; all types of people rape, but 1 gender rapes far more. Don't be lazy. If you really do be…
/r/MensRights26/05/18 06:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter