TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Klopek_ Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by Klopek_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

I think it's great when people acknowledge errors. It's not a sign of weakness but strength and integrity. Feminists could learn a thing or two from posts like this. How hard would it really be to admit that they fucked up badly (assuming their intentions were noble to begin with) on the Duluth Model and Shared Parenting, for example? I wouldn't expect the charlatans who run the DV/divorce industries to modify their views, but other feminists could force them to. Instead they attack ALL men's ri…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 12:06 AM
2

True enough. So that's one. Perhaps you can name a few more (I would honestly be interested). Monster is a fascinating example of how male vs. female serial killers are treated. That film (along with the documentary about Aileen Wuornos) was highly sympathetic. Wuornos had a horrific childhood, she was physically and sexually abused. Some feminists even regard her as a hero of sorts of for "striking back against the patriarchy." I eagerly await a highly sympathetic portrayal of a serial killer l…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:53 PM
7

You may or may not be aware that more people died in capitalist India between 1950-1970 than in all communist countries in history. US-backed capitalist death squads killed at least 6 million people in Latin America. Also, socialism is not the same thing as communism. There are libertarian socialists, who were in fact the original libertarians. Glass houses and stones etc. signed, not a communist, nor a capitalist. Edit: you may also be interested in the history of the Nazis. Guess who funded th…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:47 PM
11

Indeed. I have a degree and I don't consider myself "superior" to people who don't. It wouldn't even occur to me to select a mate based on social status. But men are also "shallow" to the extent that they overvalue physical beauty and youth. Just more proof than men and women are different. I enjoy reading "Against Men's Rights" from time to time, just to shake my head at the staggering hypocrisy. My comment on hypergamy was highlighted in a new thread there. It ironically confirms exactly what …
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:08 PM
2

I don't understand why material about Roosh V keeps getting posted here. He is explicitly anti-MRM. Feminist trolls perhaps?
/r/MensRights28/08/15 07:55 PM
6

Perhaps, but women are no strangers to serial murder. A recent academic study posted here suggested that there have been 300 female serial killers in US history alone. Odd that we never see any movies about them. I'm guessing it's because their crimes tend the lack the lurid sexual component. I can't imagine an "entertaining" movie made about female baby famers who slaughtered babies, sometimes by the HUNDREDS: http://www.sciencevsfeminism.com/the-myth-of-oppression/violence-by-women/female-seri…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 07:49 PM
5

I have no problem with the term "cultural libertarian" -- seems like a pretty good fit -- but it's important to remember that not all people who oppose the current crop of insane SJW's embrace right-libertarian economic and political views. Several of the people on that list are actually libertarian socialists/anarchists, including Wilde and Chomsky. Aside from violent campaigns against outspoken blacks, the most significant free speech battles in the US occurred during the early 20th Century. A…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 07:38 PM
39

Hookup culture isn't the real problem facing singles today. It's math unrestrained hypergamy. Newsflash ladies: blue collar workers are not "beneath" you. Anyone with an IQ above 80 can get a college degree these days. Workers make the world go 'round, and provide you with useful things like electricity and plumbing.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:32 PM
16

The Reddit user welcomed Koehler's exit. "Frankly everyone was glad to see the back of Christie Koehler. She was batshit insane and permanently offended at everything," the user wrote. "When she and the rest of her blue-haired nose-pierced asshole feminists are gone, the tech industry will breathe a sigh of relief." It was that remark that appeared to trigger Beard's warning today. That's it!?
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:58 AM
0

Not because they couldn't own property, or vote, or because it was literally impossible for a wife to be raped by her husband. It was "invented" because women were bored. I've seen it explained to you numerous times on this board that women could indeed work, and own property, and that the vast majority of men could note vote until the late 19th Century, and that women were given the right to vote as soon as the majority claimed to want it (but without corresponding civic obligations), and that …
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:39 AM
3

Absolutely not. Feminism has been disastrous for the West, it will not improve matters for the East. Feminism IS useful insofar as it demonstrates to less developed countries exactly what NOT to do. You can't build a gender equality movement by only looking a areas in which females are disadvantaged. I do that think egalitarian movements would be helpful to regions where women have less rights. But feminism? Hell no.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 01:47 AM
-1

That's your own interpretation and that's fine. I think it's a clever indictment of the absurdity of modern feminism.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 11:47 PM
2

Men should be proud of their accomplishment, but they should also recognize the equal contributions of women. Men have no problem recognizing the contributions and sacrifices of women and never have. Feminists, on the other hand, seem to have a very difficult time recognizing the contributions and sacrifices of men. Indeed they go far beyond merely not acknowledging male virtues, they attack our sex and engage in revisionist history to paint men as nothing but oppressive bastards. Men and boys a…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 11:43 PM
4

I think the post is excellent. It succinctly shows the absurdity of modern feminist narratives, while also drawing attention to the fact that class is the most important indicator of "privilege."
/r/MensRights27/08/15 11:34 PM
18

When men were doing all that great stuff, women were hardly idle - and pretty much barred from having employment out of the household. This is flatly untrue. The first labour union in the US allowed women, for example. If women weren't allowed to work (working is such a privilege! ---> feminist logic) then why were they involved in labour unions? Pretty much no feminists believe that men don't contribute meaningfully to society. They just want to highlight the under-appreciated contributions of …
/r/MensRights27/08/15 10:10 PM
20

You seem to be missing the point. It's not meant to be taken literally. The image highlights the absurdity of western women claiming to be oppressed due to their sex while men work dangerous jobs to keep them safe and privileged.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 09:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter