Knoestwerk Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	I was refused service today in the U.K. because I’m a man Sorry but this sounds so fake. If you're a MRA why would you accept it calmly. Why didn't you call your SO when they said no? She knows the owners, why would go back home, let your SO get it sorted and then go to another store?? EDIT: a supermarket gave you a free item after you bought flour?	/r/MensRights	14/03/21 06:49 AM
-1	So apparently (in the usa) only men have to register in the draft and somehow the initial (obviously correct) ruling got overturned. What the fuck is this shit A lot of feminist groups have fought for being able to serve, but it was denied until fairly recent by the (US) government. I agree with your point of shit needing to be equal, but the draft/service is not one of those points on feminist shoulders.	/r/MensRights	03/02/21 05:43 AM
21	Imagine men being cancelled after being ACCUSED of rape and then this. The court didnt rule he was a wife beater. They ruled it wasnt libel. Two different things, unlike Amber Heard and a make-up doll that got filled with shit and hatred.	/r/MensRights	20/01/21 01:42 PM
2	Following a petition, Winchester University cancelled a talk with two men's rights activists in 2019. Here is the text of one of the talks (by William Collins) that were planned. It covers education, suffrage and coverture. It's disappointing that such views can't be expressed in such a forum. Perhaps so yes, doesn't discredit the existing problem though. As the guy starting the thread chain mentioned, both sexes have issues in place.	/r/MensRights	10/01/21 06:19 PM
1	Following a petition, Winchester University cancelled a talk with two men's rights activists in 2019. Here is the text of one of the talks (by William Collins) that were planned. It covers education, suffrage and coverture. It's disappointing that such views can't be expressed in such a forum. Have you read your own source? The paper linked is a paper by a philosopher who talks about (amongst other things) the discussion whether morals come from a higher being, and whether they can be taken as proof for the existence of god. And it states literally in the conclusion that there is "No version of the moral argument constitutes as proof of God's existence". How is that a peer-reviewed paper arguing for Gods existence?	/r/MensRights	10/01/21 12:13 PM
3	Following a petition, Winchester University cancelled a talk with two men's rights activists in 2019. Here is the text of one of the talks (by William Collins) that were planned. It covers education, suffrage and coverture. It's disappointing that such views can't be expressed in such a forum. My question was to provide this peer reviewed paper.	/r/MensRights	10/01/21 11:42 AM
2	Following a petition, Winchester University cancelled a talk with two men's rights activists in 2019. Here is the text of one of the talks (by William Collins) that were planned. It covers education, suffrage and coverture. It's disappointing that such views can't be expressed in such a forum. And your peer reviewed paper of God existence that is supposedly a discredit to academic papers?	/r/MensRights	10/01/21 10:47 AM
-5	Following a petition, Winchester University cancelled a talk with two men's rights activists in 2019. Here is the text of one of the talks (by William Collins) that were planned. It covers education, suffrage and coverture. It's disappointing that such views can't be expressed in such a forum. Sources are key here. I have seen none for any of your statements.	/r/MensRights	10/01/21 10:38 AM
-8	Following a petition, Winchester University cancelled a talk with two men's rights activists in 2019. Here is the text of one of the talks (by William Collins) that were planned. It covers education, suffrage and coverture. It's disappointing that such views can't be expressed in such a forum. So your anecdotal evidence goes over academic papers? I think that sums up the problematic trend of this sub. I miss the days where we would pride ourselves for being reasonable.	/r/MensRights	10/01/21 10:24 AM
-13	Following a petition, Winchester University cancelled a talk with two men's rights activists in 2019. Here is the text of one of the talks (by William Collins) that were planned. It covers education, suffrage and coverture. It's disappointing that such views can't be expressed in such a forum. Here's one that you dont hear often on this sub: Women are taken less serious when complaining about pain, resulting in undiagnosed issues which in turn can lead to serious consequences. One source from a Harvard paper	/r/MensRights	10/01/21 09:25 AM
6	Netherlands Will Promote Shared Parenting Source? When it comes down to most powerful passport the USA isn't even ranked in the top 40. It's also harder to move from the US to (Western) Europe than vice versa. If you go for citizenship specific you could go by the QNI which ranks the US 25th right behind Bulgaria and just in front of Japan. Edit: Highest spot with some googling I could find was some US based news site that put the US at 15th. Which was using GDP per capita as the main weight in their methodology.	/r/MensRights	10/12/20 12:33 AM
-9	Male victim of rape: "I got raped for 3 years in a row and I don’t think I’ll ever recover from it" Reddit: Remove post! No clue what that meme is, do you mean faulty generalization fallacy? In that case I am not arguing I'm being downvoted en masse, I'm saying I'm being downvoted by people who are buying in this false narrative of both the title and the poster above me, which are members of this sub.	/r/MensRights	08/12/20 09:46 AM
-15	Male victim of rape: "I got raped for 3 years in a row and I don’t think I’ll ever recover from it" Reddit: Remove post! She said that she thought he loved her. She could be talking about her dad. She is trying to show support in her way and shares her experience and you shit all over it? EDIT: Screw your downvotes. The post I replied to is full of shit. The original post is full of supportive people. People that show disgust towards the shitty rewards, people that show sympathy, people that share. The OP was not "Downvoted into oblivion", it has over 2K upvotes. There is also no indication that Reddit removed the…	/r/MensRights	08/12/20 07:36 AM
1	Like slut shaming, period shaming, childcare shaming, childbirth/breastfeed decision shaming.... child free shaming is also done mainly by women to women.... yet feminist (not women who know the truth) due to ideology blame men for this? Da F**K? Exactly my point, why is he complaining about people being okay with women not getting kids while they are shamed for it as well.	/r/MensRights	07/12/20 11:02 AM
6	Like slut shaming, period shaming, childcare shaming, childbirth/breastfeed decision shaming.... child free shaming is also done mainly by women to women.... yet feminist (not women who know the truth) due to ideology blame men for this? Da F**K? Shamed for being clever and brave? Did you not watch the video?	/r/MensRights	07/12/20 09:32 AM
3	This is from the 1912, a world that encourage and expect men to sacrifice their lives for women is not a world of male privilege and domination over women. the patriarchy is a conspiracy theory. I'm not saying I'm disagreeing they don't tend to die earlier, but I am saying that using the life expectancy difference to say men had it worse across the board and that women are privileged is a narrow statement.	/r/PussyPass	04/12/20 03:33 PM
5	This is from the 1912, a world that encourage and expect men to sacrifice their lives for women is not a world of male privilege and domination over women. the patriarchy is a conspiracy theory. Ad hominem, I'm not a feminist, I'm arguing that the arguments made here are missing points. And false equivalence, classism existing doesn't change the difference between men and women. How about women born into a family of coal miners? How about wealthy men? Also in wars the majority of casualties tend to be civilians, not soldiers. Ask them how much say they had in that. Claiming no women suffer in wars is at the very best a shortsighted statement.	/r/PussyPass	04/12/20 02:14 PM
2	This is from the 1912, a world that encourage and expect men to sacrifice their lives for women is not a world of male privilege and domination over women. the patriarchy is a conspiracy theory. That's why I mentioned universal.	/r/PussyPass	04/12/20 11:45 AM
0	This is from the 1912, a world that encourage and expect men to sacrifice their lives for women is not a world of male privilege and domination over women. the patriarchy is a conspiracy theory. It took more than a decade for black men though. The 3/5th law was still in effect till 1868. Even then there were extra laws in effect that would turn black men away from voting booths untill the 1960s, aside from that there was the general social environment (Tusla Massacre 1921 for instance).	/r/PussyPass	04/12/20 11:38 AM
3	This is from the 1912, a world that encourage and expect men to sacrifice their lives for women is not a world of male privilege and domination over women. the patriarchy is a conspiracy theory. Very anecdotal. On that note, who said the world was fair? It wasn't. But just because men had the draft and "forced chivalry" doesn't mean that women were holding the power. For instance men were legally allowed to take their wives earning, even if it was the woman working. In a divorce a man would always get custody if they'd choose so, and they would have the right to keep all property (house/money etc.).Women were seen as overly emotional to the point that they were not taken serious. Men co…	/r/PussyPass	04/12/20 11:32 AM
11	This is from the 1912, a world that encourage and expect men to sacrifice their lives for women is not a world of male privilege and domination over women. the patriarchy is a conspiracy theory. Depends on country. In the US white men had universal suffrage in 1856 regardless of property owned. Women had it at in 1920 and people of color had it in 1965. Europe and other parts of the commonwealth tended to have it earlier than the US, though times vary widlly.	/r/PussyPass	04/12/20 10:30 AM
21	This is from the 1912, a world that encourage and expect men to sacrifice their lives for women is not a world of male privilege and domination over women. the patriarchy is a conspiracy theory. It was 1912 dude. Men truly had a bigger say. Yeah some worked coal mines, but they at the very least had voting rights.	/r/PussyPass	04/12/20 07:52 AM
-6	Remember folks, our fight isn't against women, but the current wave of feminism Here's Jess Butcher's Ted talk about equal rights, and how women are treated better than men in a lot of ways that are ignored. I do not think conscription and voting rights are the same issue. Which I'll refer to my other reply that female and male rights can coexist and instead of saying "my God look what they have let's take that way" to change it to "-Our- rights can be improved here" regardless of what others might have as rights. Also in the future I suggest you drop the "sigh". It comes across as very demeaning and is non-constructive.	/r/MensRights	23/09/19 08:20 AM
-2	Remember folks, our fight isn't against women, but the current wave of feminism Here's Jess Butcher's Ted talk about equal rights, and how women are treated better than men in a lot of ways that are ignored. Theres enough old school feminists that are not of the extremist variant. And I would like to not be seen as a Male counter variant of 3rd wave feminists, but rather recognise that more moderate feminists bring about serious discussions about women's issues. And MRA would talk about actual male issues, there is no reason both can't exist at the same time. Just because the biggest voice of feminism is the current wave of feminism doesn't mean the majority of feninists is like that.	/r/MensRights	23/09/19 06:03 AM
9	Remember folks, our fight isn't against women, but the current wave of feminism Here's Jess Butcher's Ted talk about equal rights, and how women are treated better than men in a lot of ways that are ignored. Because screw equal voting rights? If we want to be heard as a voice of reason instead of women haters, stick to the topics that would benefit us and not stop to the level that some current wave feminism has brought itself to. Voicing MRA like this is what gives MRA an (often undeserved) bad name.	/r/MensRights	23/09/19 05:35 AM
3	Repost but so true! Father’s are important! (Ironically humorous) Disagree, it's not perfect but there is a fair share of women that are forced into single parenthood and raise great kids. The single greatest detriment would be situation like abusive households, intense drug use, living in a warzone, or no gaurdians whatsoever. To put single mothers in that bracket is unfair to say the least. On top of that it also suggests that single fathers are better than single mothers of which there is no proof.	/r/MensRights	07/05/19 05:39 AM
12	Doris Lessing: Let's never forget one famous feminist who finally decided to speak out against misandry. 3rd wave is. 1st and 2nd are a different story.	/r/MensRights	19/04/19 09:13 AM
7	Female double standards are ingrained in our society. 80 lbs though?	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/03/19 01:13 AM
40	Woman pays to get her nails done The last option was "both" though...	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/02/19 12:52 AM
2	Me too double standard is sickening Poor attempts at being edgy then.	/r/PussyPass	01/02/19 12:57 AM
1	Me too double standard is sickening FYI, Chris Rock is the comedian, not Chris Brown.	/r/PussyPass	31/01/19 08:35 AM
6	Do We Need An Alarm? Animal?! Did you just assume that beings state of being? It could identify as a pineapple slicer, you don't know!	/r/MensRights	29/01/19 09:39 AM
1	Cosmo says it's bad that men get turned on during sex... AFAIK yes, seems to support the exact same values, though more focus on equality in sexes.	/r/MensRights	04/11/17 08:03 PM
8	Cosmo says it's bad that men get turned on during sex... Is it though? The meaning is defined by the people using it, and if enough people find feminism to be pro-female and anti-male, it will just become that, horrendous as it may be. Labels often don't stick to their original meaning, and labels even differ in meaning regarding cultures where they are applied.	/r/MensRights	04/11/17 12:52 PM
20	Cosmo says it's bad that men get turned on during sex... You're right ofcourse. But the problem is that the loudest (selfproclaimed) feminists nowadays are the radical ones, giving people the idea that radical feminism is synonym to all feminism. To the point where I have people my age distancing themselves from the title feminist and proclaim themselves equalist instead.	/r/MensRights	04/11/17 09:18 AM