TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KoNP Archive

View 8 posts and 279 comments by KoNP on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you say so.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 09:56 AM
1

Usually drug addicts have zero problems in the world until you take away their drugs. Or until they run out of money and start robbing people to get their fix.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:47 AM
1

So the same thing that you women do to buff tradies (and defend your right to do so) is tantamount to rape when a man does it to you? Fuck you, lady. Or don't, actually. Anyone that does is risking getting labelled some kind of degenerate sex offender.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:35 AM
7

Defriend them unless you constantly want to be hit in the face with how much you rape women by being a man.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:53 PM
2

Magpies have, do, and will continue to blind and otherwise seriously injure people in this country. They're not nasty birds by nature, they're not evil or anything, they're just very protective of their family unit. So offering to quickly transport someone out of their territory makes sense considering the alternative. Interestingly enough, if you manage to befriend a magpie, it will remember who you are for a very long time and not swoop you because it recognises you're not a threat. Pretty wiz…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 08:54 AM
8

I would want to help because it's the right thing to do. I used to feel the same, then I noticed just how fucking much us men were getting looked at sideways for doing absolutely nothing wrong. Fuck it. I'm done helping people who would throw me under a bus if it convenienced them.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 08:52 AM
5

Should the guy have let the girl get attacked? Yes. If society has decided the role of a man approaching a child for ANY reason is that of a child molester, then the only sane choice is not approach any children anywhere regardless of the reason or the situation they're in. If guys everywhere just stopped lending assistance and let the children of these cumrags get injured/hurt/whatever en masse, then when the cunt parents inevitably cry about how "onlookers did nothing", they can be told "We're…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 08:49 AM
6

You don't see the necessity in allowing an organ to perform its primary function properly? Lol, ok bro. I can see this conversation's not going to go well so I'm bowing out now.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 09:42 AM
9

Protects the glans from damage and irritation (which is why people who've been cut have that rough dry look - that's because it's become keratinised i.e. more like skin. The covering of the glans is a mucus membrane, hence how easily it gets damaged), contains a good couple of thousand extremely sensitive nerve endings (arguably among the most sensitive on the penis), reduces or removes the need for lubricant due to the gliding motion, and arguably makes sex better for the woman (if performing c…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 07:40 AM
23

Eyelids gather gunk, let's get rid of them too. Who cares if they perform a necessary lubrication and protection function, that's never stopped them removing foreskins before.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:52 PM
6

Yeah, it does matter, because if you're raising someone else's kid while they're off probably having more with women married to unsuspecting men, then you've failed at the evolution game and the guy whose baby it is has won, HARD. He's managed to disseminate his DNA and not have to put any effort at all into the upbringing. Parasitic cuckoos do it as well.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:41 PM
1

But of course, only he'll be charged, because she's the victim, amirite?
/r/MensRights22/04/12 11:21 PM
16

Welcome to Reddit, where character judgement is more important than contributory posts.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 02:18 AM
6

Wait for the tumor to kill her. If it's gone untreated for 10 years chances are this behaviour marks the beginning of serious personality changes characteristic of late-stage brain involvement.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 04:35 AM
-4

you denounce them as 'sanctimonious assholes'. Because they are. do you even understand how fucking selfish your worldview is? I got this T-shirt for christmas, it sums up my feelings on your statement.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 07:27 AM
-9

You mad, trannybro?
/r/MensRights26/12/11 07:27 AM
2

It's funny that you think you have a right to "educate" people and be safe from being told to go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 07:23 AM
12

Someone pointed out some threads going back several months calling for the banning of subreddits, the removal of users they disagreed with, the enforcement of "laws" that had to be vetted by them and so on. Basically the poster child for a bunch of people who want supreme bureacratic control over as much as possible. I'll try and find the collection of links for you. -edit- Here you go, I'll just link you to the post containing the links I'm talking about. Please note that the sentence on the en…
/r/MensRights26/12/11 12:19 AM
–

Hey, you wanna see some REAL crazy people? /r/transphobiaproject Bunch of sanctimonious assholes, those ones. Think it's their duty in life to "educate" everyone.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 11:24 PM
–

That's what happens when a bunch of women filled with impotent rage get together. I guarantee you these bitches are the same kind who talk big about what they're gonna do to someone who "hurt" them next time they see them, but when they DO see them, it's all smiles and rainbows and cupcakes. Cowards, all of them.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 11:07 PM
20

I don't know whats wrong with those people over there. They're extreme feminists who are actively looking for things to get angry about. They fancy themselves the censors of the world - whilst at the same time showing behaviour that has no respect for personal opinion or non-popular points of view. Interesting that their statements about themselves make them out to be protectors of freedom whilst their behaviour showcases them as, essentially, the right hand of a totalitarian dictatorship (namel…
/r/MensRights25/12/11 10:59 PM
–

Angry little feminists with no real power and a whole lot of crazy, that's what they are. Their subreddit is just an exercise in browbeating into submission the people they disagree with, throwing around the words "misogyny!" and "TRIGGERS!! TRIGGERS!!" like they're fucking confetti at a wedding, and generally just being a bunch of shitstirring cunts. Fuck them, and fuck their idiotic den of feministic circlejerking. I couldn't give a rat's ass if they decide to link to me over this comment eith…
/r/MensRights25/12/11 10:57 PM
2

For some reason, Mostly that Sydney women are heinous, uppity cunts of the highest degree. Who the fuck would willingly put up with that shit when they could just have a few beers at home, maybe watch the game and have an idle wank to boot? Sounds like a much more enjoyable night than listening to some crusty bitch's whining.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:09 AM
1

I'm always on top when this happens. Not sure how she'd manage to arrange that kind of position. Even if that were the case, she's right: it is remarkably pleasant to wake up inside her.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:45 AM
2

I wake my girlfriend up with sex all the time. I seem to be one of those "sexsomnia" "sufferers". Several times I've woken up in the middle of penetrating her, which I obviously initiated. She doesn't Mind. She says it's nice to wake up to. From the sounds of things your girlfriend is OK with the idea of what happened. You're right in that it's your saving grace, but you shouldn't be freaking out about it as much as you are. Making a huge deal of his will just make you both feel worse, an it's a…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 10:59 PM
2

It wouldn't matter how many people do it, he never will step down. He's the perfect example of someone who shouldn't be a mod being given mod status. I'd like to throw my vote in for the "get rid of this scumbag" party.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 10:49 PM
–

You should not be getting downvoted for this. It's true. In fact, it's verifiable and true. I'm guessing somebody posted this thread to /r/lgbt when they sensed they were losing the argument in a big way. Such a shame.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 04:15 AM
2

There are no fights between my girlfriend and I over the position of the toilet seat. Why? Because neither of us are small-minded petty-thinking slackjaws. It would appear to be a rare scenario.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 09:35 AM
8

Because he's a coward. It's easier to rant on the internet about "next time" than to actually man up (yes, I said it, fucking bite me if you don't like it) and do something about it THIS time. By not being completely dismissive of his behaviour here you're essentially enabling him. If everyone told him to GTFO and either do something about it or STFU and left it there then maybe he'd be motivated to do something. But continually responding to him just allows him to put it off for longer.
/r/MensRights02/05/11 09:45 AM
-6

Why not reply like others have? Because there's no point. Unless you didn't notice, poffin and her little crowd of man-haters are blaming pretty much everything on men and MRAs. Why waste your time trying to talk sense into someone who has none?
/r/MensRights20/02/11 12:10 AM
-1

Basically anyone whose need for the seat outweighs my own. So simply being a woman is enough "need" in your mind for you to give one your seat for no other reason? Wow, they've certainly got you trained well, haven't they.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 10:01 PM
-3

Are you fucking dense or something? What part of "please stop trying to drag the thread off-topic" is unclear to you? Do you feel you've achieved something beyond simply chronicling who mentioned what first in order to make a point (what that point is, I don't know or care)?
/r/MensRights12/02/11 09:23 AM
0

That's nice, but we're not talking about people with kids/carrying children here. Please stop trying to drag the thread off-topic.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 07:49 AM
5

but in the end it's only a bus seat. True. So I guess the healthy, non-pregnant woman who wants to sit there won't mind if I refuse to get up for her just because she's female, right?
/r/MensRights12/02/11 07:36 AM
2

So then why doesn't the hypothetical woman in question just deal with having to stand up on the bus while I sit? After all, it's hardly an inconvenience, correct?
/r/MensRights12/02/11 07:22 AM
3

Well I'm not in the States either, but given the amount of abusive messages I've received since posting my thoughts, I had the distinct impression that it's expected of people (men) to get up and let a woman to sit down or face shaming. but from where I'm from if you have legs you can stand, no matter what genatalia you have. Yeah it's like that here too.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 05:37 AM
5

Wearing heels is a bad fashion choice and a worse public transport one. I wouldn't feel the need to give someone my seat because they made a bad choice in footwear - their blisters might force them to think twice before wearing them next time. As for pregnancy - I would give a visibly pregnant woman my seat because carrying an infant in her uterus is a tiring task for a woman, and it's better for her cardiovascular health and the well being of her potential child to not be standing up in a crowd…
/r/MensRights12/02/11 05:34 AM
3

It's not. The expectation of preferential treatment to women simply because they are female is, however. Look at the thread I've linked to. Not one person replying to me in the negative has managed to provide any kind of justification for it besides something linked to a woman's gender. What does that tell you?
/r/MensRights12/02/11 05:19 AM
4

I would think it showed great manners to offer the seat, I don't, have never and will never disagree with this. Yes, it is particularly good manners to do so. However, and this is my contention here, it is not BAD manners to NOT do so, nor is it fair that getting up and giving a woman your seat on the bus is expected of you to the point of abuse if you don't submit. That's been my point the entire time. Sadly, people seem to be missing that and are just seeing "HURF DURF BITCHEZ N WHOREZ R SLUTZ…
/r/MensRights12/02/11 05:17 AM
4

There are so many ways to interpret that, and it can be linked to so many other issues such as the age of consent, freedom of artistic expression, relation to porn in general. No topic of discussion should be banworthy because mods think so. My point exactly. By doing this they're basically just saying they don't want any discussion to take place on a topic they find personally disagreeable - even if it's only obliquely related to said topic through application of insane troll logic, and even if…
/r/MensRights03/11/10 01:15 PM
–

It's still bullshit to threaten a ban for anyone discussing the subject using "advocation of child porn" as a hand-wave excuse. It's fucking sad that you think discussion of a topic that has many, many grey areas and differs around the world is "shit". I guess when you're a simpleton there's only so much you can comprehend though, eh?
/r/MensRights03/11/10 12:37 PM
12

I read the thread that supposedly "advocated child porn" and all I saw was the OP attempting to make some valid points about how real child exploitation is lumped into the same category as a 15 year old girl taking photos of her own tits on her own camera in her own mirror. Instead of intelligent discourse I saw a bunch of fire-breathing idiots, a few people talking about killing people like OP, a few people saying "durrhurr the law sez 16 yr olds iz chilluns derp" without addressing the dichoto…
/r/MensRights03/11/10 09:28 AM
2

or illegal small breasted australians and illegal 40 year olds in pig tails. But it's already like that in... Oh. I see what you did there.
/r/MensRights03/11/10 09:16 AM
1

that's about it, example: if I whine about not being able to find the right jacket in exactly the right color, I should check my privilege and remember that this is a strictly first world problem and that I am lucky to be able to afford jackets let alone to get picky about them. That's utterly ridiculous. But hey, I guess it's feminism so that comes with the territory, right?
/r/MensRights31/10/10 01:40 AM
0

I'm gonna agree with this, right here and now; reddit has been turning to shit for a long time but it's become painfully obvious this last few months exactly how far down the shitter it actually is.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 12:41 PM
23

Throw the whole fucking bookcase, hopefully.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 10:58 AM
4

Society is severely regressing at an alarming (and accelerating) rate.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 01:46 AM
5

Because they're not for men to benefit from - that'd be sexist, remember?
/r/MensRights12/10/10 02:20 PM
10

See it's easier for everyone if we just gnash our teeth and rage on reddit. The second anyone mentions actually getting some good ol' fashioned real world restitution, the "don't be hasty"/"don't put yourself on their level" crowd steps up the plate to implore us to "fight the good fight" and "not to give in to their bullshit". People are getting their lives completely and totally ruined at the hands of empowered modern women and the best we can do is tell each other not to "overreact". Let's fa…
/r/MensRights12/10/10 01:38 PM
4

Edit 3 is the one that's telling.
/r/MensRights12/10/10 01:43 AM
1

Because it's not termed chivalry if it's towards another man?
/r/MensRights11/10/10 01:31 AM
0

Which is why firemen are given extensive training to deal with these situations. Seriously. Are you advocating dragging someone out of the room by their ankles/shoulders simply because getting through a door is a little "tricky"? What the fuck is this lowest common denominator shit? Guess people have forgotten how to fuckin' turn sideways or something.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 11:52 AM
1

Like... orca fat.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 07:51 AM
0

A fireman's hold or fireman's carry is performed thusly. You bear their weight across your shoulders making it the easiest and most efficient non-assisted lifting technique (when you're lifting another person, anyway).
/r/MensRights10/10/10 06:47 AM
4

Living in fear of your fiancee. In what universe does this pass for a healthy relationship?
/r/MensRights10/10/10 06:46 AM
2

She hit me hard enough to rock my head pretty much fully forward causing my neck to overextend (which hurts like fuck, if you don't know from experience) and my eyes to water. This was not a playful slap. What would you consider a "proportionate" response? Better yet, don't even answer that question, I'm not sure I want your opinion.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 05:58 AM
0

She can't lift a body in a fireman's hold which is the most efficient (and therefore simplest) way to do so. What makes you think she can control a firehose, something that typically takes 2 to 3 well-built men to hold, aim and brace properly?
/r/MensRights10/10/10 04:51 AM
7

Yeah and I've got a "don't want to burn to death because I was trapped behind a fat, slow, fat, self-centered, fat fat fat bitch who is fat" problem.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 02:01 AM
1

That makes me more angry than it's healthy to be. He should kill her and everyone who mocked him. What the fuck has happened to society when that kind of shit is just ignored or worse, excused? Oh yeah. WOMEN. Fucking... bitches and whores, seriously.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 01:41 AM
-1

What does marriage mean to her? Meal ticket and an easy way to score some money and cool shit. Pretty much the same as it means to any modern woman.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 01:37 AM
3

That's exactly what it is. Feminism has nothing to do with equality and everything to do with power. Women love power - look at how often they seduce and blackmail male co-workers in large companies. Look at how they manipulate office politics to best benefit them. Women as a group cannot be trusted.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 01:32 AM
1

Wow. How did we get to the point where such a thing would be so unusual? Ask the women, they're the orchestrators.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 01:30 AM
2

Measlymonkey is demanding this guy be banned and calling him a "sick fuck" because he's posting something that goes past measlymonkey's personal boundaries without going past the boundaries of the law. I can imagine that anyone pointing this out is going to be called a "sick pedo scum fuck childfucker" as well, because that's the logic these people tend to work on - "MY MORAL BOUNDARIES ARE BETTER AND MORE VALID THAN YOUR MORAL BOUNDARIES SO I'M GOING TO FORCE MINE UPON YOU". Personally I think …
/r/MensRights10/10/10 01:24 AM
4

if your fiancee is worthy of your trust Don't think she is. They're not even married yet and she's dictating what career he's to have and what space in the house he's permitted to do his thing. This is a toxic relationship and I guess OP is just another passively angry dude who "hates" women but isn't willing to make the necessary changes to his life. In fact, I'd say the majority of his hatred is a slow simmering aggression towards his fiancee that he's just too cowardly to do anything about - …
/r/MensRights10/10/10 01:20 AM
6

So fuck your fiancee. Her "I want you to do something different" is just her trying to control your life. You're not even married yet and she's already saying what she wants you to do, because you know that's so much more important than what you want to do, right? If this is a deal-breaker for her then to be frank: she never wanted you, she only wanted what she could potentially change you into. And I'm not sure if I'm reading this right but did you say she's moved all your shit into the garage …
/r/MensRights10/10/10 01:16 AM
1

You have yet to say something I disagree with.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 01:06 AM
2

A friend's girlfriend decided she'd deliberately mishear something I said the other night so she could slap me full-force across the back of the head. It took every fibre of my being to not turn around and break her jaw. I did it not out of some retarded "you don't hit girls" ideology, but respect for my friend. I did tell her "never again" though. I'm pretty sure she got the point.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 01:05 AM
17

But, I thought that wouldn't be very chivalrous, Yes because I'm sure if the building were really on fire, your chivalry would impress people as they burned to death due to the FAT IGNORANT WOMAN TAKING HER FAT-ASS FUCKING TIME GETTING DOWN THE STAIRS BECAUSE SHE'S A FAT FUCKING SELF-CENTRED MINGER WHO CAN'T TAKE CARE OF HER OWN HEALTH. Yes, I can see how your chivalry would make all those dead people's families happy.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 12:55 AM
1

I've been in fire drills where gargantuan fat ladies waddle down the stairs at a leisurely pace having a discussion with the other fat ladies about the cupcakes they baked at home, or what their <generic relative here> did the other day, or... HOLDING UP THE GODDAMN LINE AS THEY DO IT. If it'd been a real fire we all would have been toast. But oh, the dirty looks I got when I piped up and said "get a fucking move on please". Fuck women in the workplace, seriously. Drama, drama, drama when they'r…
/r/MensRights10/10/10 12:53 AM
4

Well, yeah. I mean, she's a woman, she doesn't HAVE to pass the tests that show she can save someone's life as per the safety requirements. How dare anyone tell her she can't have that job, why, that's DISCRIMINATION. My father was a paramedic and once they had a blind woman apply to be one. A BLIND WOMAN. They turned her down, she sued. Thankfully the courts overturned her and said "don't be ridiculous, this has nothing to do with discrimination and everything to do with your physical capacity …
/r/MensRights10/10/10 12:49 AM
4

But... male... female... penetrative intercourse with condoms... Dude, alternative nothing. If I called my cat a dog, kept repeating it and defending it as an "alternative nomenclature", the cat would still be a cat and I'd be a deluded idiot - and people would tell me so. Why is it not the same case here? Are we that up our own asses as a civilisation as far as political correctness and "everyone gets a fair go" goes that we're now defending this kind of idiocy? "No, they're not deluded, it's a…
/r/MensRights08/10/10 06:51 AM
-2

I think it's the "not really gay". I mean she insists her boyfriend is really her girlfriend, refers to his genitals as "girlcock" (I mean what the fuck) and they use condoms which shows she recognises the possibility of pregnancy which can only occur due to heterosexual intercourse. She's also, like I said, clearly insane. I'll spare her the indignity of posting what she said to me here, but yeah. Several lettuces short of an allotment, that one.
/r/MensRights08/10/10 01:10 AM
-4

I downvoted you and then I re-read this statement and realised that I'm in complete agreement. I frequently mock, ridicule and demean people who have ridiculous ideas. Like the "lesbian" who's having a relationship with a pre-op male tranny and says that she loves "her girlcock" and refuses to see that penis -> vagina penetrative intercourse is by and large heterosexual behaviour. She's also clearly insane, judging by some of the private messages she's sent me.
/r/MensRights08/10/10 12:55 AM
5

He chose... poorly.
/r/MensRights08/10/10 12:51 AM
4

You frequently send shills over this way to make "why is MR so hateful"-esque threads, there's usually a new one every week. So basically your "agreement" is worth about as much as your opinion on the subject - not a great deal.
/r/MensRights08/10/10 12:49 AM
1

Side effects of a chemical abortion are largely the same as a standard run-of-the-mill miscarriage.
/r/MensRights05/10/10 11:37 AM
-13

You seem to be lost. This isn't 2XC. Scuttle back to your feminist keepers, troll.
/r/MensRights05/10/10 11:22 AM
5

Basically they haven't made me feel disgusting for my "maleness". I'm sorry, I'm not really sure how to elaborate further.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 10:15 AM
6

"Like everyone, men deserve to feel as though their sexuality is hot, awesome, delicious, valuable, and can be pleasurable for all parties".... Be honest, guys. How many of you have ever felt that way in your lives? Actually I'll be honest - I've been made to feel that way by pretty much every girl I've slept with. I've also had female friends that I haven't slept with give me very positive reviews of my sexuality.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 08:42 AM
5

Lol I love when the whole "the vagina doesn't sense that much" crowd throw that bullshit around, and then a woman like you comes along to categorically disprove them. My hat goes off to you, good woman. As a student of biology I am also aware of the sense capabilities of the human vagina.
/r/MensRights29/09/10 09:58 AM
8

I have absolutely nothing to compare it to, but I enjoy sex just as much as uncircumcised men, guaranteed! You're an idiot. If you circumcise your kid, you better do it to both genders otherwise you're saying you've got absolutely no problem with the gender-bias around genital mutilation, not to mention you condone a monstrous, archaic practice that deprives a male of a huge area of sexual sensation. It's not "just another bit of skin", it's protection for the glans not to mention like I just sa…
/r/MensRights29/09/10 09:47 AM
3

This is a new and exciting topic, and I'm excited to be a part of it!
/r/MensRights24/09/10 12:48 AM
2

Ignorant women who either don't know what they're missing out on or refuse to entertain the idea of trying the alternative because it's "dirty and disgusting".
/r/MensRights17/09/10 02:33 AM
2

Primal urges = natural instincts. They mean the same thing. Why do men have to "rise above" their "primal behaviour" but women are practically applauded by their own gender when they indulge in theirs? It's a primal urge for them to fuck alphas when they're ovulating - plenty of other mammalian animals on earth do it.
/r/MensRights17/09/10 12:35 AM
4

Once again, the Australian DCS/Social Services department shows just how much contempt they have for the people they are supposed to be helping. Also, the Parliamentary Ombudsman once again displays just how toothless they really are - much like every other single ombudsman in the country (I worked for a little while for the energy ombudsman in my state. "Useless" would be a compliment).
/r/MensRights15/09/10 12:07 AM
7

(For you logical fallacy fans out there who've been following all the action here, the comment I'm addressing is what's called a "straw man" argument.) Actually, no it isn't. It would be if I proceeded under the assumption that that's what you were saying. I merely asked - if you believe it's good for males for reasons of hygiene, then do you also believe the same for females. As predicted it exposed your hypocrisy and your intellectual dishonesty.
/r/MensRights14/09/10 06:48 AM
7

So I guess you think that women should get their clitoral hoods and labia removed too, right? I mean it would prevent "vag cheese" and it would lower the chances of them getting STDs and urinary tract infections, right? I mean, this is all following your logic and reasoning, of course.
/r/MensRights14/09/10 06:27 AM
12

A wikipedia page full of disproven and outdated theories is a "proportionate response"? In several studies, uncircumcised men were found to have a greater incidence of human papilloma virus (HPV) infection than circumcised men.[110][110][111][112][113] One of these studies[110] has been criticized on methodological grounds.[108][114] One study found no statistically significant difference in the incidence of HPV infection between circumcised and uncircumcised men.[115] The role of male circumcis…
/r/MensRights14/09/10 05:55 AM
17

Now their child will be at lower risk for STDs, [Citation Needed] yeast infections [Citation Needed] and general dick cheese! Cut people who don't shower also get dick cheese. All this is an argument for is the defence of poor personal hygiene.
/r/MensRights14/09/10 05:45 AM
3

medicinal marijuana licence? You have a legal document that says you're allowed to use it and you live in a state where said legal document applies, and they still hassle you for it? Isn't America grand? Land of "free", home of the "brave", place where cops will beat you til you bleed because your girlfriend is crying or because they just plain don't like "stoners". Personally I think you'd be better off expatriating.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 12:25 AM
6

Hahaha no wonder you keep getting in trouble with the cops. Seriously. Enjoy your beatings because you'll be getting more of them.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 11:55 PM
9

Don't date psychotic women who cry and flake out on you at the drop of a hat. No, seriously. Your girlfriend had to be begged to help you out after you'd just had your ass handed to you for no good reason. Is that really the kind of woman you want to spend your life with - one that a) doesn't do shit to defend you when it matters and b) doesn't do shit to help you out afterwards unless you beg for it? Dump the bitch and fly solo for a while.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 11:31 PM
0

She has tried to steal money from us on multiple occasions, and actually prevented us from taking actions that would have increased the value of the property that she was awarded unless we gave her our voting rights on that property. Put a hit out on her. I am 100% serious. She is not your mother, she is someone who views you as a meal ticket, her next victim and some easy cash. She's basically the enemy in every way that suggests. She doesn't love you, she doesn't care about you and she probabl…
/r/MensRights06/09/10 11:12 AM
0

Learn to fucking format your text, for christs sake. You can't reasonably expect someone to read that eyeraping wall of bullshit you just posted.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 03:23 PM
0

Appeals to society and nature, Naturalistic fallacy, correlation does not imply causation.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 02:52 PM
1

You were not following science and we both know it. Your conclusions were faulty and they were based on biased, uncited comments. Your genetics argument was invalidated by the fact that it's entirely possible to fuck without risk of pregnancy. And as I mentioned after every post, each one of your walls of text was riddled with logical fallacies, faulty premises and circular reasoning. That wasn't science. It was ignorant opinion. By the way, the post I'm replying to is yet another logical fallac…
/r/MensRights28/08/10 02:50 PM
0

Too bad, because I wanted to have a discussion. No, you didn't. That was why I went and pointed out each and every one of your fallacious statements that I could identify. If you were interested in having a discussion you wouldn't have resorted to the ones that require intent - and if you were open-minded enough to have the discussion you wouldn't have fallen prey to the ones that require a narrowminded view to adhere to.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 02:40 PM
2

That's fair. What you've outlined there is a whole other can of worms I'm not in the mood to get in to right now. My issue is with the people who universally declare "incest is evil" like HeWhoDoesNot is doing, and then use outdated, invalid and underhanded arguments in an attempt to "prove" their position - or invalidate mine. I honestly see absolutely no problem with incestual activity provided it: a) Takes steps to minimise the probability of pregnancy to the absolute minimum it can. b) Is be…
/r/MensRights28/08/10 02:36 PM
-1

Argumentum ad nauseum.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 02:34 PM
1

Have you ever read "I Promessi Sposi"? Manzoni parodies the use of latin phrases and concepts during a normal discussion. Some of his characters, "Azzeccagarbugli" and "Don Abbondio" often use latin phrases to confuse the poor, ignorant proletarian "Renzo". The idea is that while Manzoni is a very stealth narrator, it's very obvious that Don Abbondio, Azzeccagarbugli and their likes sound like pretentious idiots while Renzo sounds natural and reasonable. Now, you aren't an idiot and I'm not a pr…
/r/MensRights28/08/10 02:19 PM
–

My post directly attacks the main point of your argument: that having sex with your sister is fine because birth control is perfect and there is no risk of children. But I never said that. My question was: if the sex is consensual and there is no risk of children, is it still a bad thing? That =/= "birth control is foolproof". Your argument is a strawman fallacy.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 02:08 PM
3

Do you think that if you broke a taboo like incest everyone will still be like it is? It's true that the only incest that would be legal would be the one between consenting adults, however think about what would happen if kids grew up seeing couples of brothers and sisters around. Appeal to consequences. Teenagers of ages 14-15 would have sex with literally everything, do yo think that legal age would stop them from having sex with their own brother or sister? Reduction to absurdity. Appeal to p…
/r/MensRights28/08/10 02:07 PM
–

Strawman argument.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 01:51 PM
5

It wouldn't be difficult to groom a younger sibling in order to have sex with them; the concept of "consent" and "above the age" would fall apart. Do you think that if incest were legal only people "above the age" would practice it? Come on, it's an utopian view that doesn't even apply to the article posted. Moving the goalposts. Appeal to consequences.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 01:46 PM
2

First, the whole "consensual" thing would fall apart if incest were legal - do you think kids below the age of consent would stop themselves from having sex with their siblings if everyone else started doing it without any consequences? Reduction to absurdity. Still, the "strawman" argument is by far the most valid: take a look at animals. They don't normally have sex with their pets and seek mates outside their families, in most cases. Appeal to nature. Laws concerning those aspects aren't simp…
/r/MensRights28/08/10 01:44 PM
6

Are you saying that just because now contraception is so easy everyone should have sex with everyone? If all parties consent and are above the age where they're legally recognised as being able to, then yes. Who are you to demand otherwise?
/r/MensRights28/08/10 01:16 PM
7

By your logic, pedophilia is alright because children can't get pregnant, right? As long as you continue to use that strawman - even when I've gone to the effort of stating it's consensual sex between people at or above the age of consent - I will refuse to discuss this with you and will simply downvote your "arguments" as I feel they contribute nothing at all to the conversation. That, and you're still not answering my question.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 01:13 PM
10

Nice wall of text. I'll ask you what I asked the other guy - given that we're in the 21st century and significant advances in contraceptive technology have been made, what reason is there not to engage in consensual (above consenting age) incest provided there is no risk whatsoever of having children? Your post would seem to suggest that if you find a member of your family sexually attractive then you're deviated, full stop. It would appear you're "free" to find anyone else hot but not a brother…
/r/MensRights28/08/10 12:52 PM
–

It's the 21st century. With the advances that have been made in birth control technologies, the "geneticz meens insest iz baaad" argument is all but rendered moot, which leads me to ask you why, if the sex is consensual and there is no risk of children, is it still a bad thing?
/r/MensRights28/08/10 12:39 PM
22

Don't see why not. They both wanted it. In all honesty the real problem here (IMHO) is the "incest is illegal" law.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 12:10 PM
–

I don't see what this has to do with men's rights to be brutally honest. However if you can outline it for me I'll adjust my views accordingly.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 11:01 AM
2

They're not accountable full-stop.
/r/MensRights27/08/10 01:14 AM
1

She finds hair on her legs and under her arms to be physically uncomfortable, especially in the Australian summer. She doesn't do it for the look of it although she acknowledges the benefit there.
/r/MensRights20/08/10 03:10 PM
0

Oh dear, it seems the powers that be at 2XC have let their pet retards on the loose again.
/r/MensRights20/08/10 12:54 PM
2

My girlfriend shaves her armpits and legs because it's her preference to do so, not because society says she should. She doesn't shave her pubes - not that I'm complaining about that though ;P
/r/MensRights20/08/10 12:52 PM
2

If they insist you use it or face penalties you should report them for wilfully exposing you to hepatitis as well as a bunch of other nasties. I frequently go into work after having not shaved for the better part of a week. Fuck 'em if they want to complain. It's facial hair. It happens. I produce testosterone because I'm a male of the human race. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights20/08/10 12:25 PM
1

D E C E P T I O N
/r/MensRights15/08/10 01:32 AM
5

I second this. Thanks :) Of course you do. You have a vagina.
/r/MensRights15/08/10 01:06 AM
2

Be obviously loaded down with excess cash.
/r/MensRights11/08/10 12:14 AM
3

I find myself agreeing with you. No amount of going through the courts or trying to get this sorted out legally has ever helped a case like this. Men are finding themselves taken advantage of more and more and more these days. The courts don't give a shit, they're there only to grease up the money-dildoes the women then fuck themselves on - money taken from the last guy they took advantage of, of course. It's sad but the women that do this really deserve nothing else than to have a hit taken out…
/r/MensRights08/08/10 09:02 AM
-1

Because casting a negative light on ANYBODY who is gay, regardless of accuracy and regardless of relevance to their sexual preference, is homophobia. Haven't you read your tolerance handbook?
/r/MensRights07/08/10 08:57 AM
3

The high moral ground (FWIW). He might be brain damaged and she might have gotten off without a sentence proportionate to the assault, but at least he's got the MORAL HIGH GROUND!!! (tm) Give me a fucking break. This bitch deserves to be tortured to death.
/r/MensRights07/08/10 08:56 AM
1

Yeah I'll correct that.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 04:04 AM
1

Cut their ears off. Then tell them they're over-reacting and you just did them a favour by removing extraneous pieces of flesh that can quite easily become dirty, occluded or infected. Failing that, punch them in the throat and tell them next time they come near you with a comment like that you won't pull the punch.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 02:39 AM
-1

I'm gonna voice my agreement here. ak49vigilante, your girlfriend is a whore on top of being a disrespectful bitch and an adherent of heinous double-standards. You're pussywhipped, indicated by phrases like: but she's not that kind of girl.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 02:26 AM
4

Oh dear lord I couldn't read that without grimacing.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 07:25 AM
2

I don't see what that has to do with... anything, really. But thanks for the totally useless factoids, dude.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 04:41 AM
–

Yes, it has been taken over by feminists. However, the mods that are here do one of two things. They either a) Say "Prove it!" and then go "LALALALALALAL CAN'T HEAR YOU LALALALALALAL" when you do; or b) go "We recognise there's a problem but we don't want to stoop to the level of banning them, because that's just too mean and it would be QUASHING LEGITIMATE DEBATE YOUBETCHA". In short, the mods here are either feminazi shills or complete fucking idiots. This has become brutally apparent as of la…
/r/MensRights01/08/10 06:41 AM
6

For some reason, this link was reported. The reason was 2XC and the fact that we still will not ban feminazi trolls that originate from over there.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 10:58 PM
–

Fucking shut up. I am sick to death of hearing this fucking statement. Women can walk around saying whatever the fuck they want about us - disgusting, pigs, brutish, stupid, insensitive, threat to children - but the minute we start trying to get some of our own back we're told not to because it's "petty"? Fuck you. Why don't you try getting your balls back from the handbag of the cunt that's got you around her little finger? Dipshit.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 10:57 PM
3

I say this every damn time a thread like this comes up: you don't like it, do something about it. I'll probably get downvoted for this but to be honest I'm tired of seeing this crap every day and noticing that it's getting worse.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 10:55 PM
4

As I noted above my ex used to wear that shirt, and she turned out to be an emotionally unbalanced, manipulative, man-hating dyke.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 01:16 AM
10

My ex used to wear the "Boys are stupid, throw rocks at them" shirt made by the same lot that made the shirt in the picture. She turned out to be an unbalanced man-hating dyke. Who'da guessed it.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 01:12 AM
1

She has no marketable skills? He has no marketable skills? FUCKING TOUGH, IT'S NOBODY ELSE'S PROBLEM.
/r/MensRights29/07/10 09:20 PM
0

This is a miserable, bitter, and bullshit answer. Yes, heavens forbid I want people to actually be responsible for their own marketable skills when they're a single entity. You're just another feminazi apologist. It's unconscionable to argue in favour of things like spousal support using wheedly arguments like "but she has no marketable skills!!" Fucking tough. Not my problem.
/r/MensRights29/07/10 08:53 PM
4

But it's fucking true. Seriously. Whatever, man. Jam your head into the sand until it's so deep you can taste last year's cat turds.
/r/MensRights29/07/10 10:01 AM
2

You know, as long as people keep accepting this shit and act like it's not common and widespread behaviour, pretty soon these are the headlines we're going to see "Innocent woman sues man for having a penis and hence being a potential rapist scumbag". This shit has got to fucking stop and yet nobody is willing to do what it takes to stop it.
/r/MensRights29/07/10 09:59 AM
-1

Pft, yeah fucking right. Courts have already got fathers paying for kids that provably not theirs. They've got them paying "child support" when the wife is making more than them. They've got them paying "spousal support" when the wife's new boyfriend just happens to be loaded. What the fuck makes you think they'd respect a little piece of paper that says "Prenuptial agreement" on it? By this point it's abundantly clear that in the family court there's no such thing as a "miscarriage of justice" …
/r/MensRights29/07/10 07:55 AM
1

Women seem to think having a warm moist hole in their crotch is the only marketable skill they need to have. And that's fucking reinforced by a society that practically gives them a free ride simply for having two X chromosomes.
/r/MensRights29/07/10 07:52 AM
0

nd now she has no marketable skills to live off of And who's fucking fault is that? It shouldn't be my fucking responsibility to financially support my former other half post-breakup. What the fuck kind of insane troll logic is it to suggest that because SHE doesn't have any marketable skills, I should have to pick up the slack? Fuck her, if she was lazy and self-centred enough to feed off me instead of getting out and GETTING some marketable fucking skills, then she should have to suffer the co…
/r/MensRights29/07/10 07:48 AM
2

I think it's funny that even though all of this shit happens on a verifiably regular, visible and wide-spread basis, people still insist that a) cops are on your side, *really!! and that b) women are not by-and-large amoral self-centred gold-digging whores. Regardless of how damn much this shit occurs, people still pretend like it doesn't. Now we have at least one guy, more than likely quite a few, dead because of people's refusal to help with a bad situation their passivity helped create. Oh, a…
/r/MensRights29/07/10 07:42 AM
2

Not trying to sound like an insensitive asshole...but did adoption never cross your minds? You have no idea how tightly women will cling to their children when they see their potential as, essentially, a meal-ticket.
/r/MensRights29/07/10 07:37 AM
4

You forget, she has a vagina. Hence, she can do absolutely no wrong in the eyes of the law. Equality for all!
/r/MensRights24/07/10 04:30 AM
–

I'm pro-banning and the first person on the chopping block should be atomicparrot. This jackass exists solely, it seems, to deliberately and maliciously derail ANY conversation that doesn't follow his strict, twisted and absurdly narrow-minded guidelines. I've seen entire threads go to waste because of that fuckhead's nattering. Downvoting doesn't do shit because he/she clearly does not care about karma. He just wants to watch the place burn.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 09:17 PM
0

Or vice-versa, that she DIDN'T want kids and then surreptitiously fell pregnant?
/r/MensRights22/07/10 12:06 AM
7

I guess you missed the part where she has an idiot-proof unfakeable contraceptive implant in her arm that has kept her completely parasite-free for the past 3 and a half years - which I witnessed her getting implanted and even if I hadn't, it's visible and palpable below the skin in her arm. Which she just had replaced. So a fresh one. I guess you either missed or ignored that, yeah? I mean I'm all for being wary and careful things like you outlined don't happen, but not to the point of being ag…
/r/MensRights21/07/10 07:55 AM
0

Dude I would deface the fuck out of that if I saw it. I don't care what the penalties would be - that's not art and it's not an exhibit; it's a disgusting and shameful display of misandry and represents the worst kind of intolerance there is. So I'd slice it up with a knife, or spray paint over it. Any fine would be worth it.
/r/MensRights21/07/10 12:48 AM
1

I'm considering getting one, but right now don't need it - my girlfriend has the implanon rod in her arm which is impossible to fake, and if she got pregnant she'd be tossing herself down the stairs uterus-first before I could even think about ringing around about abortions. Still, it's something I'm considering.
/r/MensRights21/07/10 12:45 AM
-1

There's more places in the world than just the united states of america, you know.
/r/MensRights21/07/10 12:36 AM
–

I see, so it's only a "great idea" as long as nobody is actually putting it into action. You see, America? This is why your constitution is worth less than a smear of shit on toilet paper.
/r/MensRights20/07/10 10:21 PM
–

Yeah, because clearly sitting around whining about it and posting faux-outrage on a niche internet forum has achieved things on a much grander scale, amirite?
/r/MensRights20/07/10 10:11 PM
-4

So do something about it then. You've got the second amendment for a reason.
/r/MensRights20/07/10 09:06 PM
0

Hey cool, she's even got you making excuses for her. You know what? Since you're uninterested in doing anything to alter your situation, I'm uninterested in hearing you whinge about it. You made your bed, now lie in it.
/r/MensRights17/07/10 02:02 PM
–

But you are. You're basically saying "She never would have cried rape if men and society hadn't fostered her neuroses about sex." Once again, how is that not blaming the victim?
/r/MensRights17/07/10 02:35 AM
–

What you're saying is that the woman never would have "had" to cry rape if the men of the world/"society" hadn't made her feel "embarrassed about sex". So you're not only trying to make a false rape charge an excusable and understandable thing to do, you're placing a large portion of the blame on the person who is being accused. How is that NOT blaming the victim?
/r/MensRights17/07/10 02:02 AM
2

LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER LEAVE HER In case you didn't catch that... FUCKING LEAVE THE CUNT
/r/MensRights17/07/10 01:53 AM
5

For context, it's a parody of this thread which essentially blames the guys for getting falsely charged with rape.
/r/MensRights17/07/10 01:51 AM
–

If the woman had no reason to feel ashamed of what she did, would she have any reason to cry rape? Did you just... blame the victim? Why is it ok to do it here, but it's not ok to do the equivalent: If the woman hadn't felt the urge to dress provocatively and attract a large amount of male attention whilst drinking like a sailor, would she have had any reason to cry rape?
/r/MensRights17/07/10 01:47 AM
2

So guys aren't allowed to defend themselves when a woman comes at them with a knife, is that it? They just have to stand there and take it, because they're "physically more powerful"? Fuck your noise and fuck you. Go back to your keepers at 2XC.
/r/MensRights15/07/10 04:12 AM
0

and then you will be dead and she'll be let off with a light slap on the wrist due to the "trauma" the whole experience caused her being a "better punishment" than jail time. FTFY.
/r/MensRights15/07/10 04:10 AM
0

I just want someone in my corner. We're in your corner but you refuse to take our advice re: leave the cunt, so all we can do is stand here and watch you get your balls handed to you.
/r/MensRights15/07/10 04:06 AM
-1

Wow. Yeah, she is a MILF, that's for sure.
/r/MensRights13/07/10 11:45 PM
1

It's hypocritical to embrace anti-woman sexism but freak out when it's against men. You missed my point in that it's not hypocritical when only one gender is able to behave a certain way and get away with it, to call them on it.
/r/MensRights13/07/10 03:50 AM
2

Women do all of those things too, but I can't remember the last time I heard of a man getting awarded extra child support from a woman for a child that isn't even hers.
/r/MensRights13/07/10 12:22 AM
7

Wait, hang on. She was found guilty of sexual molestation of a child... and nothing was done about it? What the fuck? Meanwhile, men are being treated like they are disgusting scum if their gaze lingers a little too long on a 16 year old in a bikini? For fucks sake.
/r/MensRights12/07/10 09:45 PM
1

you can contest paternity and get out of the relationship before the courts would consider you a father. In theory, yes. In practise, all the woman has to do is refuse to do a paternity test and you're screwed. Given the cases I've been seeing where she's done exactly that and the guy still has to pay, anyway.
/r/MensRights12/07/10 09:35 PM
14

Your ex is a woman, yes? Not only can you not stop her, she will continue to abuse the system with the blessing of the courts, no less. To her, you're not a person, you're a meal ticket. And to the courts, she's a woman and thus is pure, virginal and can do no wrong. I wouldn't be surprised if there's a sharp increase in the amount of young adult men getting vasectomies. Not that it'd help - seems the courts like awarding child support to women and taking your money even if you're provably not r…
/r/MensRights12/07/10 09:20 PM
4

I think they subpoena the guy with a court order to get a DNA test. Which they then promptly ignore because the guy "accepted the responsibility"/"was the only father the kid knew"/"makes more than the woman and is therefore fiscally responsible for the child". So tell me again why it's wrong to regard all women with disdain and suspicion until it's proven that the individual examples of the gender I encounter DON'T fit the above formula? I'd really like to know what part of limiting my own liab…
/r/MensRights12/07/10 09:17 PM
8

she can toss my name down and if she doesn't "tell me" within that window I'm just shit out of luck? Pretty much, yeah. But you can't point out how insane that is without being labelled a misogynistic prick.
/r/MensRights12/07/10 09:14 PM
4

They just want somebody to pay for the mother's high living standards, because she "deserves" it for discovering the practical use of her uterus and vagina. FTFY.
/r/MensRights12/07/10 09:13 PM
9

Aren't women and equality grand?
/r/MensRights12/07/10 09:11 PM
3

With all due respect, fuck off, Hahaha, you white-knighting disingenuous coward. Fuck off back to your keepers at /2xC.
/r/MensRights10/07/10 02:01 AM
3

Of course they are. There's absolutely nothing they can say on this issue that won't compromise their position and cost them credibility. So they're just pretending it didn't happen. Because you know, denial changes reality if you deny REALLY REALLY hard. Fuck women's rights groups and fuck feminists.
/r/MensRights10/07/10 01:56 AM
1

I've been following this for the past few days. You know why she killed her kid? It wasn't because she was sad. It wasn't because she was trying to "protect" it from abuse. It wasn't a merciful killing because it was facing a horrible life with its father. The mother was about to lose custody. This was an evil, petty, "if I can't have the kid then nobody can" revenge move, plain and simple. This woman never gave two short shits about the kid or its father - she was selfishly motivated the entire…
/r/MensRights09/07/10 01:48 PM
1

I feel for their families. Feel sorry for the man who had his child murdered by a selfish psychotic cunt. Don't feel sorry for her and definitely don't feel sorry for her family - they raised her and resulted in this, after all. Her mother more-than-likely instilled a "princess" entitlement complex into her at a very young age. Fuck feeling sorry for them. BLAME them.
/r/MensRights09/07/10 01:47 PM
4

I've been following this for the past few days. You know why she killed her kid? It wasn't because she was sad. It wasn't because she was trying to "protect" it from abuse. It wasn't a merciful killing because it was facing a horrible life with its father. The mother was about to lose custody. This was an evil, petty, "if I can't have the kid then nobody can" revenge move, plain and simple. This woman never gave two short shits about the kid or its father - she was selfishly motivated the entire…
/r/MensRights09/07/10 01:45 PM
3

If you keep getting bitten by dogs, experience teaches you that dogs are vicious creatures that bite you. Don't fault someone for changing their default position on the basis of repeated experience. For example, the fact that I can even remotely trust my current girlfriend as well as the fact that I'm happy with her would be considered fucking astounding if you knew my history with women. As far as I'm concerned, I'm fucking entitled to a streak of misogyny.
/r/MensRights09/07/10 01:36 PM
-1

And they can't figure out why so many single fathers try to kill themselves. GEE I FUCKING WONDER WHAT COULD BE MOTIVATING THAT KIND OF THING. Fuck women. Fuck the courts. But most of all fuck women. Evil, soul-sucking cunts.
/r/MensRights09/07/10 01:34 PM
1

The only way I'm having kids is if they can somehow go from 0 to 18 and move out in the space of one day. Either that, or human cloning gets perfected so I can clone a version of myself age 18 and send him out there. I really don't want kids. Neither does my girlfriend. We're pretty content with this and each other, as you can imagine.
/r/MensRights05/07/10 08:02 AM
1

If you think it's stupid to like Stephenie Meyer's books: they're nicely written For very low values of "nice".
/r/MensRights04/07/10 10:41 AM
2

but I like both Stephenie Meyer's books ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights03/07/10 11:41 PM
5

Don't get into a fight with atomicparrot. It'll end with your brain attempting to exit through your ears in a desperate bid to get away from the stupidity and ceaselessly circular reasoning. You'd have better luck talking physics with a moose.
/r/MensRights03/07/10 11:39 PM
2

"irreversible vasectomy. Vasectomies are reversible - it's called a vasovasostomy. Also these days it's my understanding they don't sever the vas deferens completely, instead they install a tiny little clip that "pinches" them completely closed, making any "restoration" of function that much easier.
/r/MensRights03/07/10 11:11 PM
3

Why, so some woman can get anonymous artificial insemination and then subpoena them for my details so she can take me for 18 years of "child support"? No thanks. Besides, don't want kids. At all. Can't stand them.
/r/MensRights03/07/10 03:37 PM
2

Women like this are the reason that I'll be getting a vasectomy if for whatever reason my current relationship goes to pot. My current girlfriend has respect for me (and me her) plus the contraceptive rod in her arm - she's not likely to pull the "whoops I got pregnant, time to leech you financially" thing unless she's got some kind of preternatural control over her hormones. Other women, though? Lately I've realised that there's a fractional percentage who behave like my current girl - the rest…
/r/MensRights03/07/10 12:44 PM
-2

Wow. Why is someone this misandric, bigoted and offensive permitted to post on reddit, let alone permitted to continue to exist? One day she's going to say the wrong thing to the wrong person and wind up beaten, raped or killed. Gonna be honest here - that wouldn't be met with any pity or sympathy from me.
/r/MensRights03/07/10 12:41 PM
-3

you are just OLD. OLD and BITTER and CYNICAL and HATEFUL and VICIOUS!! I wish I could hurt you back, but you are the masters, congratulations, dry old fucks No 14 year old knows how to talk like that. There's several other things in your post that make me doubt the credibility of your story. Sorry, but I'm calling troll on this one. Scamper back to your friends over at /2xc and tell them how "the mensrights men are bastards just like we said".
/r/MensRights24/06/10 09:01 AM
7

Funny how "your vagina was wet and your clit was engorged so you must have liked it" wouldn't stand in court. What double standard?
/r/MensRights02/06/10 10:45 AM
19

You got banned from there because you post here. The same thing happened to me. I've never posted over there either and got banned for it. That's also how to fight like a feminist - pre-emptively remove your opponent from the argument so you win by default due to their absence. What nlakes said about their lack of integrity and honour is spot-fucking-on.
/r/MensRights24/05/10 08:41 AM
4

No, it's innocent until proven guilty, unless you're a man, in which case you're guilty by default. Shit like this makes me livid.
/r/MensRights09/05/10 07:21 AM
6

Nice try, woman who's waiting to get married so she can divorce her husband and take half his shit.
/r/MensRights09/05/10 06:24 AM
0

Fuck a goat :)
/r/MensRights01/05/10 10:24 PM
0

The arrogant behaviors you present are very much capable to turn people away from evidence-based medicine who then find their relief in the arms of the quacks who are always 'nicer'. Wow, nice. In addition to burning strawmen for me, you're also blaming me for people making bad emotional decisions and getting burned for it. Fuck you, buddy. People as stupid as you should be weeded out of the gene pool before you have a chance to procreate.
/r/MensRights01/05/10 08:33 AM
1

Hahahah. Keep it up, man. You're making my argument for me with statements like: You seem believe that you are able to diagnose anybody with anything, from a distance, using scarce or even non-existent data Considering I'm arguing FOR the use of medical tests on babies that present with fever.
/r/MensRights01/05/10 06:54 AM
-3

That post was so amazingly stupid and ignorant, I don't think I'm going to add to it. It's a perfect example of late-stage mob-mentality retardation as it is.
/r/MensRights01/05/10 05:27 AM
2

Thank you. I appreciate the support amidst a sea of ignorant emotionally-triggered downvotes. Babies can have febrile seizures quite easily, temperature is usually the trigger there and it doesn't have to be elevated much at all. Additionally, for blood to be spewing out the way the story-writer claims, the doctor doing the tap would have been too incompetent to have gotten her license in the first place. Of course there's going to be bleeding, they're sticking a big bloody needle inbetween your…
/r/MensRights01/05/10 03:43 AM
-1

Lol, keep it up with the insults, smart guy.
/r/MensRights30/04/10 11:26 PM
1

Well for starters, the idea that you could get cerebral palsy from a spinal tap is ludicrous. Lets just get that out of the way. Secondly, the father admitted in another thread to not understanding the medical procedures AT ALL. Due to my mother and father's professions AND my studies I know much more about them than he does. In the first part of the story, he flat-out says "because she is a hypochondriac" when talking about his wife. When I challenged him on this statement (being as I saw it as…
/r/MensRights30/04/10 11:22 PM
-6

WTF, what are you more interested in here, sympathy for your daughter, or praise for your writing skills?
/r/MensRights30/04/10 10:51 PM
-1

So stop sympathy whoring.
/r/MensRights30/04/10 10:49 PM
-2

You and I have already been over the fact that: a) a baby presenting with fever is a very, very bad thing. b) a spinal tap to test the presence of meningitis is not abnormal here. c) you disregarded your wife's concerns and called her a "hypochondriac" d) and you're more bitter about your wife "hurting you" than anything else, which is the main impetus for you REPEATEDLY posting about this. I don't expect anyone to read this comment either because it'll just get downvoted into oblivion by the co…
/r/MensRights30/04/10 10:47 PM
3

Not to mention this marks the eleventy-billionth time it's been posted here.
/r/MensRights30/04/10 10:34 PM
21

How on earth is this a MR issue? It's girls beating another girl almost to death. /r/2XC is that way.
/r/MensRights23/04/10 02:17 PM
3

Yeah I'm downvoting this stupid fucking thread because it's entirely NOT what happened in the video. Vote with the lower part of the invisible H, dude.
/r/MensRights17/04/10 10:58 AM
3

I'm not defending it. Of course not. You're just listing multiple things you think call the man's testimony into question.
/r/MensRights14/04/10 03:12 AM
1

eh?
/r/MensRights13/04/10 11:53 PM
0

Harass? No. However I'm more than aware of the fact that there's several people here who could mount cohesive, non-aggressive arguments against what she's saying. I am not one of those people, and on a point as important as this it would be counterproductive for me to respond to her because I'd degenerate into enraged ranting all too soon.
/r/MensRights12/04/10 08:54 AM
-1

I tried to highlight to her that her statements were misleading and misandric only to be basically told that I wouldn't understand and that men are simply "more likely" to commit rape/violence. I was also told that men are more likely to prey on drunk women then vice-versa, because they're men. I was ALSO told that if it were otherwise, then there would be research done into it and the statistics would reflect it. Basically, Jenjena seems to believe that men are more likely to be monsters just b…
/r/MensRights12/04/10 03:50 AM
2

I was more amused/disgusted by this gem. You may miss it at first, so read through it a few times.
/r/MensRights12/04/10 01:40 AM
–

Go back to /r/2XC to be with your own kind.
/r/MensRights08/04/10 07:51 AM
6

That just looks to me like something explaining why there IS a wage gap between men and women. There is no wage gap. Women are paid equal rates to men. They just do less work. A LOT less work, in some cases. If women want the same per annum income as men, they need to stop their bitching and do the same amount of per annum work, simple as that.
/r/MensRights08/04/10 04:18 AM
19

She thought this was the most disgusting, sexist idea ever and, in the end, made me take time out of a busy schedule to do it. /rant I would have said no, stood my ground and politely but firmly challenged her to take it further if she thought anything would come of it. All you achieved by capitulating to her unreasonable demands is establishing that you will jump on command in future if pressured slightly. Expect it to keep happening.
/r/MensRights08/04/10 04:09 AM
0

They need to rein in their members, they really do.
/r/MensRights28/03/10 01:13 AM
2

What a fantastic world we live in.
/r/MensRights28/03/10 01:08 AM
0

And then the judge says she was under a lot of strain and pressure and besides, he was being emotionally unsupportive and should be more aware of the effect he has on other people. Verdict: a commuted 6 month sentence with no recorded convictions whilst the guy is sent away to think about how he could have "handled the situation better". I hate society. I hate the institution of women. I wish it would go back to the way it was in the 30s where their opinion didn't count for shit. A reset might a…
/r/MensRights28/03/10 01:07 AM
5

Hitting someone in self defence, hell even SHOOTING someone in self defence is not only "okay", it's legally recognised and allowed. I don't give a rats arse if the court of public opinion thinks it's wrong, because the court of public opinion is made up of morons, hypocrites and liars. And they would not hesitate to behave comparably when it's them copping the short end of the stick.
/r/MensRights27/03/10 11:24 PM
72

Hitting a girl in self-defense is not okay. WHAT THE FUCK ಠ_ಠ How fucking dare he say it's "not right" to defend myself if some crazy bitch is swinging at me with fists or worse, a sharp object (as they so frequently like to do). Am I to just stand there and take it with my face? Hell, if that's the case I might as well hike my pants-leg up and cut my entire wedding tackle off with a knife, save them the hassle of having a man who dares to try and defend himself. For fucks sake. Men like the one…
/r/MensRights27/03/10 02:05 PM
3

I see his point - his co-workers as women don't give anywhere near as much of a shit about prostate cancer as they do about the possibility their tits might get malignant lumps, so why should he give a rats arse that their tits might get malignant lumps when the question of prostate cancer is a much more important one to them? I hold myself to similar principles. When Victoria was busy burning down the year before last, there were numerous donation drives at my then-job for it. I flat-out refuse…
/r/MensRights25/03/10 01:03 AM
3

It would be Skene's Gland cancer, not Prostate cancer. Prostate =/= Skene's gland. If they were the same, they would be called the same. Anatomically, they're not. There's precedent for this too - every other organ in the human body that's the same is named the same regardless of gender. To me, calling the Skene's Gland the "female" prostate is as idiotic as calling the vagina the "female penis", or the labia minora the "female scrotum". Whether they're analogous to one another is besides the po…
/r/MensRights25/03/10 12:58 AM
3

They can't get testicular cancer though, and there doesn't seem to be anywhere near as much funding for research into that as their is into female tit cancer.
/r/MensRights25/03/10 12:53 AM
–

Wow, you paid for your own ring AND the three that your wife wanted. It's going to hurt so bad when you catch her cheating and she divorces you, taking everything you own in the process.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 01:07 PM
1

Yeah there is. She's also a redditor. She also recognises how pants-on-head retarded it is to assume someone didn't do something when they obviously did, just because they weren't witnessed doing it.
/r/MensRights15/03/10 01:42 AM
9

I would have turned to her and said "Well how the fuck is the house getting clean, bitch? The bad noise you're making tells me it's not you doing it, so maybe harry fucking potter got his house-elf buddies to keep the place tidy when we're not looking." Then again, I'm a complete cunt, so that's not unusual for me. Your mileage may vary.
/r/MensRights14/03/10 03:32 PM
-4

Oh look, it's this thread again.
/r/MensRights08/03/10 03:41 AM
–

Find this woman and punch her. OR get your wife to. Just keep punching until she pisses blood.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 12:53 AM
-11

LOL America. According to them, I'm probably the father of a black person in Rwanda that's been alive twice as long as me. You know, because 'MURRKA YEEAAAHHHHHHHHHHH BOIII!!!! HURRRRRR!!!! Embarrassing to be on the same planet as this bullshit.
/r/MensRights22/02/10 03:08 AM
-10

This is true on both sides of the coin. Women like to cocktease all the way up to the end of the night and then claim they never wanted to do anything. If they're not allowed to do that then neither are guys. You're a coward, OP, pure and simple. Nothing was stopping you from saying "I'm not that into you" when you first had misgivings, and the fact that you continued to fraternise physically with this woman makes your story dubious at best.
/r/MensRights20/02/10 11:57 AM
2

She was a complete moron in the situation but still doesn't make it right that she was raped in her sleep. Saying that it serves her right and her behaviour led to this outcome =/= condoning or excusing rape. It's fallacious and intellectually disingenuous to deliberately confuse the two, and it's the same kind of error that us MRA accuse women of all the time. Personal responsibility is not just a buzz-word, it actually means something. Stringerbell is absolutely correct in what he said.
/r/MensRights19/02/10 03:54 AM
2

Who said anything about women not trusting me? I think you need to go back and re-read my comment, specifically this part: find a bitch like this I'm not raging against women indiscriminately. If that's not obvious to you then I'm sorry, perhaps you should see someone about your comprehension difficulties.
/r/MensRights19/02/10 03:06 AM
1

It's a Palin child, it's never going to amount to shit if it doesn't do this so what's the problem? I just thought to myself, I wonder if Michael Palin of Monty Python is embarrassed that there's a distant familial link between himself and these anti-intellectual mouth-breathing pituary homonculus fucking mongoloid half-wit failures?
/r/MensRights19/02/10 01:38 AM
0

I did say I hate how angry it makes me. You think I like feeling like that? No. But what's the fucking alternative, passivity and going "oh, it's not so bad?" Fuck your judgement, you stupid shit.
/r/MensRights19/02/10 01:02 AM
-1

I read shit like this and it makes me want to find a bitch like this and shoot her in her thighs and cut her tits off just to watch her bleed. I don't like that this kind of shit is allowed to fly these days, I don't like feeling like I'm a second-class citizen due to cock and balls, and I hate even more how fucking angry it makes me and how little I can do about it.
/r/MensRights18/02/10 11:29 PM
1

After calling them out on the "feminist troll" comment and asking for them to back up their accusation, I was told that it "didn't matter" if I was a feminist or not, simply because I'd been disrespectful to someone and then called an overzealous mod out on their bullshit. Nice to see the guys in charge display that level of intellectually dishonest behaviour. There was absolutely no way for me to win that once Rygarb had decided I was a feminist. Amusing, really.
/r/MensRights14/02/10 12:04 AM
4

DISREGARD FEMALES, ACQUIRE CURRENCY!! I'm going to go heat up a bagel and then fuck it. DOWN WITH WIMMENZ. ...er...what was this thread about again?
/r/MensRights09/02/10 12:15 PM
5

Well, of course. My penis makes me an evil, bad man remember?
/r/MensRights09/02/10 04:24 AM
8

You forgot to remove a conscious and non-anaesthesized infant's frontal and temporal lobes whilst chuckling. Oh, and moustache-twirling of course.
/r/MensRights09/02/10 01:03 AM
-2

ZUB ZUB
/r/MensRights08/02/10 11:23 PM
14

Don't forget being chained to the kitchen sink and being forced to wash razor-sharp knives and disgustingly-dirty plates in blisteringly-hot water, with a kidney-punch awaiting even the slightest complaint. /Burns a box of kittens and punches a baby whilst moustache-twirling.
/r/MensRights08/02/10 11:01 PM
2

Instead, you'll make the same argument that's based in emotion, not fact - over and over again, amirite? Post something of substance and I'll consider it. Until then you're just another whiner who's sore because her precious ego took a beating and she hadn't a leg to stand on in it's defense.
/r/MensRights08/02/10 01:56 AM
10

Yes, broad generalizations will get you everywhere. Says the woman whose initial post consisted mostly of some rather broad generalisations. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
/r/MensRights08/02/10 01:53 AM
4

There already is good progressive discussion. That it doesn't meet your approval is entirely inconsequential. Cite the "hatred" or shut the fuck up, you've been asked several times already.
/r/MensRights08/02/10 01:46 AM
5

So a man having the sensitive and physically normal and healthy skin of his penis hacked off before he's old enough to consent or even form words - but not too young to feel pain - isn't a men's rights issue? Defend your position before I'm forced to declare you a sadistic, heinously abusive cunt.
/r/MensRights02/02/10 08:21 AM
-6

You're an idiot. He was saying that psychologists tell us it's where boys are "harmed" but that only ever happens in the real world if it's taken too far. The actual effect is the boy learns better control over his emotions. That was THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT to his blog post. Christ. The fact that men have control over their emotions whilst women make their emotions everyone else's problem and take no responsibility for them. Your mind must be about as deep as a rock pool.
/r/MensRights01/02/10 11:41 AM
9

You should be talking to a lawyer about this shit, not reddit. How many times is that said in threads like these? TALK TO A LAWYER.
/r/MensRights31/01/10 03:20 AM
4

Hire a private investigator to get the information you need.
/r/MensRights31/01/10 03:08 AM
–

Get fucked you fucking faggot failure. How's that for cussing?
/r/MensRights27/01/10 09:07 PM
3

You're female which automatically invalidates any opinion you have on the subject. Shut the fuck up while the men are talking, honey.
/r/MensRights27/01/10 09:06 PM
3

GO EAT A COCK AND SHUT THE FUCK UP, WHORE.
/r/MensRights27/01/10 12:57 PM
0

Somebody should take a cheese grater to your face. I'd fucking laugh my arse off, you piece of shit.
/r/MensRights27/01/10 12:57 PM
–

Fuck off, you fucking feminazi apologist. Fuck off back to the protective shadow of womyn who don't give a flying fuck about you past what they can use you to achieve.
/r/MensRights27/01/10 12:56 PM
-1

Guess you missed that recent story about the guy being forced to pay child support for a child that the courts were well aware was not his - he got arrested, and now they're taking him to court to recover the child support money he didn't pay whilst in jail. The court has once again acknowledged several times that the child isn't his. Whether the child is his or not doesn't make a difference here, THAT'S why he's screwed.
/r/MensRights23/01/10 03:26 PM
8

Uhm... what? They've acknowledged multiple times that he is in no way related to this kid. And yet they're saying he has to keep paying money? Why? What possible justification can they use that isn't going to look like a serious miscarriage of justice? Oh, wait. It's about a woman and her child. Of course.
/r/MensRights23/01/10 09:01 AM
0

Sounds like it's his kid. Not only is your girlfriend lying about the birth control, she's fucking her husband behind your back. You're screwed, pretty much. No court in earth is going to rule in your favour, they'll all tell you you should have "been more cautious".
/r/MensRights23/01/10 02:56 AM
1

Sorry, but they are. A man getting his foreskin cut off is anatomically comparable to a woman getting her clitoral hood cut off. The clitoral hood is a foreskin also, as the clitoris is analogous to the glans penis. Hell, it's even called the glans clitoris, the visible bit that is. So I guess you are an ignorant hypocrite after all. Enjoy your mutilated scarcock.
/r/MensRights22/01/10 01:04 PM
1

I'm a dude, and my girlfriend prefers me uncut, yes.
/r/MensRights22/01/10 10:37 AM
1

If you have a daughter, you have to get her labia and clitoral hood cut off before she's old enough to refuse. You know, if you don't want to look like an ignorant hypocrite.
/r/MensRights22/01/10 08:36 AM
8

So you think that having normal, healthy, functioning flesh hacked off leaves it looking more NORMAL? I'm uncut and any woman that dares utter the words "cut is better" around me gets a disapproving glare and a snap of "go and get your pussy lips cut off then." And yes, I do actually say this, in public, if I hear the advocacy of circumcision for cosmetic reasons.
/r/MensRights22/01/10 08:33 AM
18

A place for pussies to whine about the pains coursing through their vaginas... Actually wouldn't that be "/r/feminism"?
/r/MensRights20/01/10 10:49 AM
0

How about: That's the way I piss, that's always the way I've pissed since I could walk, and fuck anybody that tries to tell me I don't have the right to piss that way? That seems pretty logical to me.
/r/MensRights17/01/10 09:17 PM
2

If you do it for your own reasons, that you reached with no outside persuasion or "assistance" then there's no problem, it's just your preference. If however, you do it because a woman or a pussywhipped man told you you have to, then you're a failure as a man.
/r/MensRights16/01/10 07:16 AM
3

Don't bother replying to that cunt - she trolls mensrights just so she can snipe at guys and win points with her little feminazi club. Check out her comments page, it's patently ridiculous and somewhat enraging.
/r/MensRights16/01/10 06:50 AM
4

Can't upvote you hard enough, dude. You forgot to include the part where a man who has a "reason" for being crazy is still asked to justify his behaviour and treated as if he's in the wrong, whereas the woman gets a "leave her alone" brigade.
/r/MensRights16/01/10 06:40 AM
5

You know what, lets turn that logic on it's head.... ANY Woman at ANY AGE should be able to control her vaginal lubrication. If she doesn't it means that she's a child molester. Of course, it's different for women, right?
/r/MensRights14/01/10 02:38 PM
1

And now you're going "lolol just kidding" because I've not only proven you wrong, but I've embarrassed you on reddit, and you still think you can save face. Intolerably stupid, a piece of shit, and pathetically predictable. Glad to see you went for the trifecta. It's interesting to note just how frequently those three talents are found in each other's company. I was using effect as in "to bring about" I highly doubt that otherwise your original statement would have read as: "Prostate cancer brin…
/r/MensRights14/01/10 01:41 AM
7

and what the assailant's intentions were. And yet when threepio was showing you that the intent in this case was clearly to severely hurt or kill the guy, you completely ignored it. How many points is this winning you with your little pink feminazi brigade?
/r/MensRights14/01/10 01:37 AM
6

It's the amperes that are fatal, not the voltage. A sufficiently high-enough voltage will set you on fire or turn you to ash, but "sufficiently high" is a fucking big number.
/r/MensRights14/01/10 01:33 AM
2

That's right, attack my perceived manhood because you want to save face over being verifiably wrong. Intolerably stupid AND a piece of shit, my you're an accomplished individual.
/r/MensRights14/01/10 01:24 AM
1

Oh, my god. You're intolerably stupid. Let me spell it out for you: Affect: af·fect 1 (-fkt) tr.v. af·fect·ed, af·fect·ing, af·fects To have an influence on or effect a change in: Inflation affects the buying power of the dollar. To act on the emotions of; touch or move. To attack or infect, as a disease: Rheumatic fever can *affect** the heart.* Effect: tr.v. ef·fect·ed, ef·fect·ing, ef·fects To bring into existence. To produce as a result. To bring about.
/r/MensRights13/01/10 11:37 PM
1

affects FTFY.
/r/MensRights13/01/10 01:06 PM
0

But, I asked my wife her take on this question, and she said, "Because men can live with prostate cancer for years... it's not as threatening as breast cancer." In all seriousness: what do you see in such a braindead woman? She must go off in the sack to make up for her unrelenting stupidity.
/r/MensRights13/01/10 01:04 PM
2

Simple answer? Tits are far more sexy than a gland whose only mode of access is fingers in arse.
/r/MensRights13/01/10 01:01 PM
10

There's clubs that only allow women, and yet many traditional "men's only" clubs have been forced under threat of suit to allow women entry. You know, in the name of equality.
/r/MensRights10/01/10 06:14 AM
22

Even if the woman pokes holes in the condoms? Even if she deliberately stops taking the pill and lies about it? Even if she cheats on him and doesn't use protection? Even if the man in question was a sperm donor and winds up being liable for child support? (it has happened). I like how you're absolutely dedicated to being as irrational and hate-filled as you possibly can be.
/r/MensRights10/01/10 03:07 AM
1

Oh but that implies a level of personal responsibility that "we the people" just aren't comfortable with! Government, can't you just make it illegal for people to make me feel a little uncomfortable? That would be easier, and I promise when I learn my own coping strategy I'll ask you to take it back to normal.
/r/MensRights09/01/10 02:16 PM
1

As far as I can tell from oxamus' comment history, they're quite genuine.
/r/MensRights09/01/10 01:03 PM
–

You're in the wrong place, /r/MisandricIrrationalCunt is in that direction. Don't let the door hit your arse as you leave. And by the way, as you're doing it, go ahead and file your little charges. They'll get thrown out faster than you can scream "thought crimes are crimes too".
/r/MensRights09/01/10 12:05 PM
2

I'm not in the U.S. so I don't know what women from Brooklyn look like. I don't know why but I just pictured a generic NJ/NY girl. That was enough.
/r/MensRights09/01/10 10:34 AM
8

She made a comment in here, but it appears to have vanished. Something about me being pathetically predictable, something to that effect anyway. Just noticed this gem in the same thread So there we have it, user bklyn_chic believes that men do not have the right to look at her if they choose to. It's interesting to note how long it took to get that out of her and how much dancing around the subject she did. "Intellectually dishonest" indeed.
/r/MensRights09/01/10 07:45 AM
0

Uhm... what? I hope someone kicked that cunt's legs out from under her on her little jaunt up the stairs.
/r/MensRights09/01/10 04:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter