| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Saw this at Walmart. Sorry about potato quality....or their marketing team just thought it would appeal to women if they knew it was a woman-owned company, and decided to put it on the package. Why does it have to be part of some sinister agenda? This is the same as when feminists make a big deal out of the prevalence of male protagonists in video games. Who fucking cares? Some private company made a decision about what they want to do with their product. If you feel this strongly about it, don't buy their product, but bringing this shit up l… | /r/MensRights | 13/02/17 03:00 PM |
| -4 | Saw this at Walmart. Sorry about potato quality.Who cares? Bad marketing strategies are not a men's rights issue. The fact that women are more likely to buy a product that's "women owned" and people are less likely to buy one advertised as "man-owned" is not a "problem" I personally care to spend time being concerned with. Or a problem at all, really. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/17 05:22 AM |
| 4 | Saw this at Walmart. Sorry about potato quality.I saw that; I fail to see any problem whatsoever here. If the company is owned by a woman, how is it in any way related to men's rights for them to state as such on the packaging? It's no different than, say, Chik-Fil-A publicly advertising that they're a Christian company. They aren't saying "Men can't buy this", or making any anti-male statements. The implication is that they think some people will be more inclined to buy it if they know it's a female-owned company. How does this negatively af… | /r/MensRights | 13/02/17 03:06 AM |
| 4 | Saw this at Walmart. Sorry about potato quality.I'm sorry, I fail to see any problem whatsoever here. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/17 02:59 AM |
| 4 | Should loving fathers be given legal right to halt abortions and enforce paid surrogacy on pregnant women? Would a nine month income be enough to save a human life?Uh, no? Absolutely not? Is this a serious question? | /r/MensRights | 29/08/16 05:49 PM |
| 2 | Why is gender a legal qualification for a scholarship?I see what you're saying here, but scholarships are just individuals or foundations giving money to people for education. I could set up a scholarship that was only awarded to dogs, if I wanted to, and there'd be nothing illegal about it. It's their money, and they can give it to whomever they want based on whatever criteria they want to. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/15 08:51 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter