KookyAcorn Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Lost Get yourself a public defence attorney if you can, they should be free I think. In the meantime, gather together ALL evidence of his controlling, abusive behaviour: texts, emails, fb messages, whatsapp messages, pictures, even bank statements, if you think that would help. You've got this sis, he doesn't deserve this power over you ❤	/r/FemaleDatingStrategy	18/01/22 09:35 PM
1	[Q4All]Just how easy are “ugly” women? It’s okay to categorize people, we categorize everything else in our lives. I mean... do you feel its okay to categorise people? I don't, and I think every time its been attempted, its been the wrong call. Like catagorising fruit or the weather is one thing, catagorising people with certain face or body types is... a slippery slope. What about catagorising on ethnicity, or skull size, are these categories also okay? Because people certainly believed they were not so long ago! Look up 'phrenology…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/03/21 07:07 AM
1	[Q4All]Just how easy are “ugly” women? Do ugly girls just let anyone smash/date them? Maybe, just maybe, ugly girls constitute thousands of individuals, some of whome may play 'easy' to get, some of whome may be 'hard' to get, depending on their personality, upbringing etc. Assuming the above is true, an exact answer is hard to give, as people here will likely have different experiences. Boxing large groups of broadly different people in an attempt to obtain an overall answer is impossible. Personally, I have known some unattractive …	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/03/21 10:28 PM
1	The societal role of mother kills the sex life not the kid What an overall enjoyable conversation! I agree! even genetics has some rather ridiculous research being done and put out. I can well believe that. Academic is such a good vehicle for political point scoring. I'm pretty sure its true that Victorian 'academia' was responsible for catagorising Irish people as 'a separate, lower race' when it was politically convenient to do so, for a time. And the nazi's fabricated an entire aryan backstory to legitimise their agenda, based on 'science' and 'archa…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/02/21 11:57 PM
1	The societal role of mother kills the sex life not the kid Glad you liked the piece! Good academia is hard to come by, especially in my field where people tend to get quite fanciful! caution against assuming current even extremely isolated hunter gatherer groups behaved like those of the distant past. Oh absolutely agree, it was just an example of the wide spectra of subsistence methods. human innovation builds over time even if slowly This is also true. But between the beginning of the paleolithic to the end of the mesolthic (when farming starts to app…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/02/21 11:31 PM
2	The societal role of mother kills the sex life not the kid would deplete areas of easily catchable game quickly Which is typically why groups have very large, jealousy gaurded territories in which they move from place to place, dependent on season and availability. Now it’s possible for women who generally provided 80% of all food stuffs to the group to survive without large game This was my point. Large game is good, but not a be-all and end-all, especially for scenarios where large game can't be obtained. Like I said, all hands on deck. Here's an arti…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/02/21 10:38 PM
2	The societal role of mother kills the sex life not the kid Men hunting drastically increase survival rates. Correct, all hands on deck. I'm commenting as an archaeologist with a specialism in european mesolthic societies that this: "No, it’s what you get when you can’t hunt for yourself yet require meat to survive a pregnancy and breastfeed a child" is incorrect. Trapping, gathering and fishing are responsible for a wider range of essential nutrients, and represent a very large amount of hunter-gatherer people's diets- climate dependent ofc. Game is sup…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/02/21 10:03 PM
2	The societal role of mother kills the sex life not the kid You don't have to eat meat to carry through a pregnancy, so long as you are eating a good range of stuff. But regardless, there are plenty of small animals that women in many geographically varied hunter-gatherer societies trapped and ate, so that is also incorrect.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/02/21 09:19 PM
1	Women bully each other into hypergamy Nah you're correct- I don't think you can join up in a military capacity, but she has joined as a navy cook instead.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/02/21 11:33 PM
3	Women bully each other into hypergamy Nah. I've never seen this outside of films. If I dared to make unfounded, unwanted comments about a friend's boyfriend, I'd rightly be told to STFU. I wish people here would stop asking if 'all women do insert thing'. We don't. The answer will always be no, as we are not plugged into a hive mind, controlling us. It always sets a prescient for a poor discussion, because the starting point is already flawed. Only twice have I ever stepped in 'with the girlz' to tell a friend to leave her boyfriend…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/02/21 03:13 PM
2	Women rapidly lose interest in sex once in a stable relationship or living with a male sexual partner Unfortunately I can only access the abstract, but it seems to be someone analysing self-proclaimed incells use of the word 'femoid' online? Crazy world.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/01/21 03:54 PM
1	Women rapidly lose interest in sex once in a stable relationship or living with a male sexual partner Well... this is what I was leading to. There's no good way to prove the mission statement, because women are billions of different people living in different environments. We're not programmed robots. Academics like this love to slap big labels on their research because it gets knee-jerk reactions and, most importantly, funding. In my academic field (archaeology), there are tonnes of studies done on equally small data sets, extrapolated to explain away 'all of history' etc etc. I'm always suspic…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/01/21 03:02 PM
1	Women rapidly lose interest in sex once in a stable relationship or living with a male sexual partner And are these studies also done on relatively small groups, from shared cultures? In that case, my answer to those would be the same. I also think that the very specific way in which monogamous couples pair up in certain cultures can affect this outcome too. Are we actually measuring 'women's true nature' (haha, as if such a thing exists!)? Or are we in fact measuring the way in married life affects one half of the pair differently to the other? These are the details I'd consider to be properly …	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/01/21 01:51 PM
3	Women rapidly lose interest in sex once in a stable relationship or living with a male sexual partner I do wonder about the method of qualitative questioning used in this test. This is an example of how data gathering method can affect results. Of course men will be more likely to say that their sex drives are the same as when they were young, to a researcher. Societal expectations are that men are the most horny, and constantly want sex... which I believe is patronising to men. I just want to raise another point too, where he mentions 'evolutionary perspective'... I'm sorry, but run a mile when…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/01/21 11:11 AM
8	Do you think a lot of men get very clingy and needy after dates/sex with you? a) Some have, and some haven't (and I'm referring to dates rather than sex). Its been awkward when I've not been interested after a first date, and he's been more interested, but that's fine as long as everyone is kind. I've been in the opposite position too, and I guess its just a matter of picking up on hints. If someone wants to go on a 2nd date they'll be enthusiastic about it. I wouldn't say this is a majority of men, in my limited experience. b) I don't think it's necessarily an unattracti…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/01/21 03:00 PM
1	The manosphere totally misinterprets female attraction. 👌 kewl	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/01/21 07:26 PM
1	The manosphere totally misinterprets female attraction. I mean, I'm no marital expert, but from witnessing my own parents marriage for example, I think people change a lot over time- my parents are completely different people than they were in the mid 1990's. Most people do change in time, that's a commonly cited reason for divorce. I hear what youre saying, but again, divorce happens for lots of reasons, and not just because all women-kind constantly have to find new "tingles" and lack consistency (the original statement which I am replying to). You…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/01/21 07:26 PM
1	The manosphere totally misinterprets female attraction. No, I didn't actually. You asked if there was anything to prove that women all think/act in the same way. I said there wasn't. Its as simple as that, I'm not sure where you're getting stuck.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/01/21 02:21 PM
-2	The manosphere totally misinterprets female attraction. Nothing, because its not true. Its a stupid, baseless, illogical (not to mention hurtful) fantasy, and really gives ammo to anyone arguing the opposite point.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/01/21 08:52 AM
3	The manosphere totally misinterprets female attraction. I'm sorry, but I don't see the connection between the previous comment and divorce stats- which happen for a vast number of reasons, initiated by male and female partners. Sure some may be created by people ditching their partners for other people, but its not a good enough reason to suggest the blanket statement of female fickleness!	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/01/21 11:32 PM
2	The manosphere totally misinterprets female attraction. Honestly, I'm not sure where you have had these opinions validated, but to say -"women are always on the lookout for the man that will give her more tingles. Being consistent is not enough"- is just plain stupid. What makes you feel that any or every woman on earth thinks this? That we're incapable of making the decision to stay with a man because we love him? Really? I'm sorry, but this is laughable! Its as stupid as saying "all men=blah/all women=blah". Outside of any red/blue/whatever-the-fec…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/01/21 11:17 PM
5	Despite men and women being roughly equal in population, attractive men are seen as scarce, why is that? I'd agree with that, except for the part where you say that 99% is a waste, and that it does little to improve looks. Almost every female face you see on TV, Instagram, in magazines, even reading the news, have been 'touched up' cosmetically, but in a way that appears to be natural. I wish it wasn't that way, but it is, unfortunately. Subtle pale shades on the cheek bones for example, give the illusion of larger cheekbones (more feminine), without being noticeable. This is what leads to people l…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/01/21 02:55 PM
15	Despite men and women being roughly equal in population, attractive men are seen as scarce, why is that? My take on this is that male and female physical attractiveness is roughly equal, BUT that women spend a lot more time and resources on looking good. Think of the size of the cosmetics and fashion industry aimed towards women in comparison with men. There is so much 'secret' work gone into a woman's appearance! Btw, I say this as plainish looking woman who can, after applying makeup and a nice outfit, appear to magically move up the ranks of attractiveness. Once I'm safe at home it all disappear…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/01/21 02:38 PM
1	Should we pursuit the right person or the ideal person? To offer my 2 cents; I think that everyone has a preconceived notion of 'ideal' which can be flexible upon meeting 'right'. I thought I knew what my 'ideal' was, but as soon as I met 'right' that flew out the window. My relationship with my boyfriend of almost 5 years began as him seeming to be the 'right' type of man when we first met. He was funny, kind, introverted and expressive. Over time, our growing relationship has ever so slightly altered both of us (which is natural) and we have become…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/01/21 09:37 PM