TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KotzubueSailingClub Archive

View 1 post and 41 comments by KotzubueSailingClub on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

The ironic thing is that it gives up all the unwanted sexual contact. So much for the butt pincher being labeled a rapist. Of course that's probably by design, as then a female serial groper is in the clear, but a man who pays for sex is now a rapist.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 02:11 PM
3

Unfortunately the only recourse for the family in this case is probably a suit against the school. Whatever they did, it was not enough to avoid his decision. The accuser may never face consequences short of the sort of Lord of the Flies shit that happens among teenagers.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 01:25 PM
45

I can't wait for the internet to accuse us of brigading the game as if the entire game's premise is fine.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 01:57 AM
1

OP wrote that, the article title is different.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 02:53 AM
-1

I've been watching all the promotions for this song on mute. No problem with it at all.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 02:25 PM
766

I'll save you the scroll, since the article is on a shit website: "Everything is huge to her. Why would she tell everyone that I have a huge penis? So that every girl who sees my dick for the rest of my life is disappointed."
/r/MensRights01/04/25 12:28 PM
9

LoL, back in my college years, we joked about how the biggest, most opulent weddings would result in divorces. That was backed up by anecdotal experience of me and my friends, who saw the rich kids on the other side of the tracks get big weddings, have 1-2 kids and regularly get divorced.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 08:30 PM
13

Just no fatties
/r/MensRights18/07/24 04:20 AM
70

Lol, and 100 comments to it accusing the OP of being a TERF.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 06:11 PM
97

Sounds like a cover for a paedo ring.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 11:27 AM
11

Correct, in general they cannot make gender a qualification, but they can, after you recommend someone, reject them, and separately state they need to ensure equity, thus implying that you need to pick a qualified woman. Then it puts the responsibility back on the hiring authority to justify why there are no qualified women applicants, and if there are, then they (the authority) is stuck hiring the qualified woman.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:05 PM
25

I always think of Till, because, as much as it was racially driven, the woman involved could have had the courage to speak the truth and didn't.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 02:03 PM
-1

Like that scene in The Abyss
/r/MensRights07/10/23 12:53 PM
2

Not creepy, just be the adult and let them know that you are uncomfortable playing online with an underage person. You understand that you cannot prevent interactions with underage people in open online games, but since you are on twitch and concerned that playing with underage people could be misperceived, that you choose not to do so. Or something to that effect. You are in total control, not the redditors that want to gaslight you.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 06:14 PM
4

Almost definitely AI generated. Get more clicks by finding obscure events that include things like pederasty, and get the articles out fast, so the human in the loops does very little editing.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 02:22 PM
9

Mainly the tabloids use what is easy to get, so they skim social media. Very deceptive though, using a picture when she herself was underage.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 02:20 PM
18

I would think no, since ultimately his status with the school is the responsibility of the school, and not the 78,000 ass-hats. That being said, he should be able to sue the school, assuming he at least attempts to be readmitted (and wants to be).
/r/MensRights18/09/23 05:21 PM
238

Hmmm, 15,000 euros now, or 18 years paying for someone else's kid? Seems more like tax from the ivory tower than a punishment.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 04:14 PM
1

Dodging the flash, not the crack.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 05:53 PM
2

You know, I was going to say you shouldn't criticize the female experience, but this is so on point, it's too good.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 01:51 PM
4

The only thing of worth that is finally taking hold (just barely), is equity in paternity leave. Even that is hit-or-miss, since there are still sectors that apply terms like "primary" and "secondary" caregiver, to the parents.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 08:10 PM
13

I'm sure the extreme feminists have been saying this for decades (not sure if Gloria Steinem ever did, but would not be surprised). My favorite "mysoginist" retort that I heard to this argument was, "if men are no longer needed and they go away, then what would women have left to bitch about?"
/r/MensRights10/07/23 08:07 PM
16

What a fucking comparison. Also, trying to define some subset of the shit done at work as "housework" is so insulting to both genders.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 02:47 PM
5

"Is it the hormones, Claire?"
/r/MensRights08/05/23 03:51 PM
11

More like how were the questions asked. Whenever you use "always" in a survey question, it can cause people to think critically about circumstances that may be exceptions.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 10:58 AM
10

They should be legally mandatory if either is requested by the pregnant woman or the alleged father. If either is a minor, then that right should roll up to the parent or legal guardian.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 04:56 PM
4

Plus she's been with Bill for like a century and that man will say whatever he wants and piece it into whatever topic is being discussed. People rag on Russell Brand being all over the map (he is) but prime Slick Willy zippered his agenda into everything.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 11:06 AM
5

Never heard of her
/r/MensRights08/03/23 12:47 AM
12

That's terrible. It's not like open-toed shoes are a standard for a gender (you said yourself, where you're from EVERYONE wears sandals). In the US, we have workers rights that if you are adhering to safety standards, you are eligible to compensation if injured at work. If some poor woman loses a toe because their sandal could not stop a corrosive substance, then that is on the woman, not the company.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 10:36 PM
18

I think even 'feminists' would laugh at that one, it's a sick burn.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 10:20 PM
1

A responsible pair of slacks
/r/MensRights28/10/22 10:36 PM
5

Her lawyers will almost certainly demand alimony and child support (I know that sounds ridiculous for a woman worth 400 million, but bear with me). The lawyers need to get paid, and she will want to take what she is "owed" that will no longer be otherwise accessible once the divorce is final. Does not matter if you are worth 400 mil or are 400k in debt, the compensation will be pursued.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 08:38 PM
66

Yup, it cannot be described, so it can be applied to any behavior by a man (or even by a transgender if they were or are male), which a woman can use to cast the man in a negative light. Self-hating men can also use "toxic masculinity" to attack other men. Specific behaviors can be negative (the actions of an "asshole" if you will) but the behavior is separate from the gender, and unique to the individual.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 03:45 PM
4

And be warry of those like Tate that want to build a cult of personality around "equal rights," both from a male and a female perspective. They are normally not their to lead, they are there to be seen and heard and get attention. The are, in a way, false prophets, who seek to exploit those who consider themselves followers.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 07:57 PM
7

Same question. Is there a crime she committed in Australia?
/r/MensRights07/08/22 08:07 PM
6

These sorts of stories tell us more about the women who write them than about the men they choose to marginalize.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 01:23 PM
1

The NGO has the right to take a position, and wants to highlight that domestic violence happens to men. They still describe themselves as protecting women and children worldwide, which to be fair is a major issue in many nations that choose not to enforce laws equally and some that have laws that actively oppress women and children and condone their abuse and exploitation, but it is good to see that the NGO chose to speak out against abuse in any form. Might be interesting to see if any high pro…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 02:38 PM
10

maybe worker ants are only getting 77 ant cents for every ant dollar that a male ant makes.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 05:24 PM
4

You really want to get them going, point out that most of these paternity laws that put the burden on a man/father are based on the archaic standard that the woman is weak and needs a male benefactor or the state to carry the burden.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 01:52 PM
19

Agreed. And absolute minimum, never touch her again, for any reason.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 03:50 AM
3

The "newish" conservative movement starting in the mid-90s embraced the evangelical ideals which focused on traditional values, as in men to work, men to protect. Therefore the idea of male-only military and law enforcement (i.e. the bullet catchers) was desirable. This is usually spun as underprivileged (i.e. minority) males get treated as human refuse, but it really put all men out there as those who would "deal with it," in the face of crisis and conflict.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 09:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter