TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Krackor Archive

View 0 posts and 107 comments by Krackor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The deep dive you're looking for is in his book "Antifragile".
/r/TheRedPill05/04/19 05:43 PM
3

In an ideal world, maybe. However, not sharing the same last name has negative connotations in American culture. From an outside perspective, a family with two last names looks the same as a broken, divorced marriage. A unified family name is important to avoid that connotation, and to signal that the husband and wife are joined in support of their family in a way that they weren't before they were married. That leaves the question of whose name should be taken by the family. In the vast majorit…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/19 04:19 PM
24

It's a signaling thing. A woman who takes her husband's name signals that she's following him. A man married to a woman who keeps her own name signals that he's not leading the relationship.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/19 06:35 PM
0

Where did rape enter into it?
/r/seduction24/12/15 11:12 PM
22

No, his rule is not "don't spend money on her". It's "don't give her the impression that I spend money on her".
/r/TheRedPill26/10/15 01:29 PM
7

That's not being a minority. That's being unqualified.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 03:00 PM
3

I think I found out why you're not approachable.
/r/seduction10/05/15 04:21 AM
32

Another way of saying: Having options is attractive; desperate oneitis is not.
/r/seduction02/01/15 03:58 PM
2

it must be good for a thousand" No, of course I didn't say that. The point is that individuals make decisions based on what they think is good for themselves individually. "Society" doesn't make decisions for itself as an entity.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/14 10:52 PM
2

is a great philosophy for the individual but not a great one for society overall. Society is simply a composition of individuals, so this is a nonsense statement. If a philosophy is good for individuals, there's never going to be some transcendental entity called "society" that says "Whoa, hold up, this philosophy isn't good for me so I'm not going to abide by it". There's no jump of logic to make. There's nothing to jump to. A philosophy that's good for the individual is already complete.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/14 03:48 PM
1

Of course. Create your own frame, instead of conforming to someone else's, even if their frame is called "alpha".
/r/TheRedPill15/11/14 07:34 PM
3

It might not say specifically that you're socially awkward. It certainly does say something about you though, even if that something is just that you enjoy that hobby. Your actions define you, even when those actions are just for a hobby.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/14 07:24 PM
6

It's telling how much difference there is between students in something like astrophysics (which almost exclusively funnels into academia or a bureaucratic government organization) and something like MechE which funnels mostly into private industry.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/14 06:26 PM
0

The guy is a pussy for not standing his ground IMO. He genuinely felt he was doing something wrong. These aren't different things.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/14 04:51 PM
3

Yeah, that's kind of the hobby equivalent of "sleeping with tons of guys doesn't make her a slut".
/r/TheRedPill15/11/14 04:49 PM
5

I am in science and have quite a few female friends in astrophysics. In industry, or as students (or even worse, in academia)?
/r/TheRedPill15/11/14 04:43 PM
3

Novel learning - creating new ideas, as opposed to rote learning, which is incorporating existing ideas - is an ongoing process of trial and error, and eventually success. Algorithms like simulated annealing and genetic algorithms wouldn't work without sufficient temperature or mutation probability. Impulsiveness is the human brain's analog.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 04:44 PM
-2

It adds context to /u/RedPillSafe's comment. If you feel offended by it, don't read his comment.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 04:37 PM
5

segways Segues. Segway is the two-wheeled vehicle.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 12:05 AM
3

dog pretending he can not hear your word of command. If you have to repeat it twice he is shit testing you. My parents still have the dog we got when I was still living with them. When I go there to visit now, my dad will try calling the dog into the house from the yard. Usually he calls in a pleading tone a few times, she looks up to see what's going on, then ignores him and goes back to screwing around in the yard. Then I go out and tell her to come in, which usually works the first time, or i…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 02:15 PM
2

Every comment you're making in here screams scarcity mentality.
/r/seduction04/08/14 03:22 AM
-12

"Rape" is when the man doesn't care about the woman's consent, and the woman is attracted to the man. Rape is when the man doesn't care about the woman's consent, and she is not attracted to him.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 08:08 PM
2

I'm not interested in proving the hypothesis right or wrong (because I wouldn't get anything out of it either way) and I'm certainly not interested in doing so by doing a quote search. This entire post is about the value of subtext and non-literal communication, and about the value derived from communication rather than the literal accuracy of it. You are completely missing the point.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 04:59 PM
0

Feel free to quote Even with it spelled out for you as literally as it gets around here, you still missed the OP's point.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 06:17 AM
6

Basically if you post with obvious intent to cultivate understanding (whether your own, or another reader's), it should be easy to stay on the right side of the OP's litmus test. As soon as you start straying towards trying to win an argument (nitpicking details) or champion a cause (cry "misogyny" or something) then you're out of line.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 06:13 AM
5

Trying to socially validate their way into "winning an argument" or whatever nonsense goal they have in mind.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 06:01 AM
5

That's a bullshit analogy. You go to a guy's house alone at night because presumably you want to enjoy his company. If you don't feel safe around him, I can't imagine how you're enjoying his company. You're going to get something out of your class whether or not you feel safe on the walk there.
/r/seduction18/07/14 11:31 PM
5

If you're nervous about your safety, a good response is not to go home alone with a guy at night, especially if you have a practical option to go to your own home.
/r/seduction18/07/14 08:05 PM
1

I've been commenting a lot on that EMSK post. Well there's yer problem right there.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 11:18 AM
1

If for some reason you feel like addressing "arguments" about TRP, go use /r/PurplePillDebate.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 05:29 AM
3

The operative word in her sentence is "must". It's a defensible word because it's true in one sense - the sense you point out that women are the gatekeepers of sex. But it also has a very intended and subversive meaning, that men will refuse to be denied sex, implying forcible rape. The sentence sneaks in the (false) negative connotation while being truthfully defensible on the surface.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 02:26 PM
2

Of course, from the bouncer's perspective, it doesn't matter who's actually the more honest one, but which one appears to be more honest. If, like you, this bouncer thinks that the first to approach is more honest, then OP had better be first to approach.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 02:39 PM
10

also the "age doesn't matter" is basically a invitation for the over 50 crowd. Seems more like a subtle "Age doesn't matter to me, and you're shallow if you don't agree, so you shouldn't care about my age".
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 01:38 AM
6

It's also about people conforming to the frame that you present. If you frame the interaction as if someone is unapproachable, then it's more likely they will accept that role and act unapproachable.
/r/seduction29/05/14 04:24 AM
8

Hypoagency says that she doesn't make choices and is just a victim of her circumstances.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 03:28 AM
3

Recognize and acknowledge the exceptions when they arise, but until they become apparent the only useful approach is to generalize.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 01:46 AM
2

I've had this happen with some (female) mutual friends I have with an ex. Before and during the time I was seeing the ex, I would regularly spend time with the friends. After I broke it off, the friends avoided me unless they needed a favor.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 01:39 PM
1

It doesn't matter whether the stories are true, but whether you get something out of it. It doesn't seem like you're coming here for self-improvement, so why the fuck are you here?
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 04:42 AM
1

Depending on where you are, this may result in the state getting involved anyway: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-law_marriage
/r/RedPillWomen12/04/14 03:28 PM
-1

Own as in own, or own as in have a mortgage on?
/r/RedPillWomen04/04/14 01:53 PM
3

About as much as filling out the ballot any other way.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 12:15 AM
6

when you dont vote, you waive all rights to complain about results of the ballot. "You have to participate in this political process we made up, and if you don't participate and play by our rules, you agree to play by our rules anyway." Either way you look at elections, they're just an excuse for authoritarianism.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 01:09 PM
7

There is no other kind of self-interest.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 12:32 PM
4

Do not confuse election results with popularity. Anyone who recognizes the scam won't vote anyway, and the people on the ballot are counting the votes too.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 12:31 PM
0

Even worse are the people who spend time dwelling on mundane grammar or spelling mistakes instead of absorbing the point of the message.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 06:16 PM
1

I mean, if women are constantly told they're nothing more than fuckholes They're not. They're often told that they are the embodiment of human empowerment and the world is their oyster. and that the only thing men want from them is sex It's not, although in many cases it might be reasonable to expect little more from them. then why would they be expected to respond to a question like that any differently? Because human beings with well-developed agency can think for themselves and conceive of a …
/r/TheRedPill17/03/14 01:49 PM
2

Repetitive stress with no rest can lead to a progressive buildup of damage. (This principle applies across many domains, not just to joints and muscles.) Taking period rest periods allows time for regenerative growth to get back to original strength, or even stronger.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 02:23 AM
1

Home schooling is not equivalent to a lack of socialization. There is the potential for higher quality socialization when directed by involved parents rather than underpaid school teachers. It's also a huge benefit to socialize in an environment where kids have some choice in who they socialize with, rather than in an environment like public school where they are forced to share classrooms with people they may or may not like, and occupy an unhealthily narrow age demographic.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 02:10 AM
3

How is their long-term heart health? Joint health? Sure it's possible to work your body hard every day, but that doesn't mean it's optimal.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/14 02:52 AM
4

Actually you are failing to understand. Men's speech certainly does have implied content and emotional nuance. This is both setting up a claim which is impossible to verify or falsify, and also gaslighting kick6. No matter what evidence kick6 might provide to indicate his true intentions in communication, you can simply reply "you don't understand your own intentions".
/r/TheRedPill08/03/14 02:19 AM
2

There is a problematic assumption under which it makes sense for the girlfriend zone to be opposite the friend zone: the girl gets what she wants. This is a foundational assumption under selfish solipsism, and starting from this point it makes sense that "guy gets the sex he wants" is indeed the opposite of "guy doesn't get the sex he wants". For the truth to be realized, one must accept the possibility that the girl might not get what she wants out of the relationship.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/14 08:45 AM
1

There's a difference between caring what people think and deriving self esteem from what other people think. The former is healthy and integral to one's awareness of the world. The latter is not healthy.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/14 11:56 PM
3

Think of it this way: without a prenup, the state and its judges and legislators will determine the legal terms of your marriage. A prenup allows you and your fiance to define the terms of your marriage. As for the terms of the prenup, you should find terms that are agreeable to both of you. This should be a mutual arrangement after all.
/r/RedPillWomen05/02/14 09:35 PM
31

Too bad the dictionary definition of feminism doesn't really resemble the things claimed by feminists nor how they act.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 06:30 AM
2

The point isn't about elaborating into a story, but about sharing your values.
/r/seduction11/01/14 06:09 AM
24

It doesn't matter if they're "fair" or not. They're just the guy's preferences. If a girl doesn't agree with those preferences or doesn't want to live up to them, she can take her body elsewhere. It takes someone with a controlling agenda to complain about someone's preferences when those preferences aren't being imposed on anyone unwilling.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 07:01 AM
31

The not giving a shit is a behavioral signal of abundance. This guy doesn't act desperate around me because he evidently has his pick of the litter, so he must be attractive.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 08:16 PM
4

AWALT is a strategy more than it is a hypothesis about reality. Assuming that AWALT and acting accordingly will help protect you from the accused suffered from a woman who is like that and whom you have put on a pedestal. In the event you do find a NAWALT example, you can evaluate her rationally, knowing you've guarded yourself against pedestal bias. Assuming NAWALT is a strategy that exposes you to significant risk without and real benefit. Assuming AWALT avoids that risk while still leaving yo…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 04:22 AM
12

Turns out being a self-fulfilling prophecy to an extent.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/13 06:23 PM
1

lol, pretty much.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/13 04:13 AM
2

Here's a bit to get you started: +/u/bitcointip $0.25
/r/TheRedPill31/10/13 12:59 AM
1

My strategy of choice is to do my best to limit the wealth being taken, whether the politicians like it or not. Tax evasion is currently not as easy as I would hope. The next best option is to limit their effective revenue stream by using alternative currencies, which they do not profit from via monetary inflation. Of course I'm talking about Bitcoin here. Choosing to use it will be more effective for achieving your political goals than any vote you've ever cast.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/13 09:09 PM
1

I don't mind paying taxes, because I get a societal benefit from doing so Of course, this is one of the major ways how the haves are taking from you.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/13 06:35 PM
2

The physical nature of an asset can be a big weakness. It's (relatively) easy to physically seize physical assets like gold or federal reserve notes. It's much harder to seize an abstract asset like a bitcoin wallet, which can be stored entirely in the mind of the owner.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/13 06:26 PM
3

Default of a national bank is, if anything, likely to increase the market value of bitcoin as people increasingly desire a decentralized currency over one with a fallible central authority.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/13 06:24 PM
1

Most of human civilization is characterized by a decrease in birth rates as the quality of life improves. High birth rate is generally a strategy employed by the poor to combat infant mortality. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2054rank.html The lower the birth rate, the more prosperous the community, in general.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 01:29 PM
2

It's simply a weak pre-frontal cortex and lack of personal agency. These people are spectators in their own lives. Instead of them doing things, things happen to them.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 01:47 AM
1

Collapsing birth rates don't necessarily indicate genetic evolutionary failure. There are many more factors that account for a species' survival than the number of offspring they produce.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/13 11:45 PM
2

There is also a lot more risk in hoping that one person (dictator) is virtuous, while hoping that the average person is virtuous essentially diversifies that risk. There is an evolutionary advantage to diversity of mutation. The broader variety of mutations that take place, the more likely it is that a beneficial mutation arises and spreads. The same goes for social norms in society. Many people trying many different social norms diversifies the search for beneficial "mutations". This is in cont…
/r/TheRedPill14/10/13 05:05 PM
4

Except it seems that nearly everyone who is open to the truth knows it already. The growth of this sub indicates otherwise. the purplepill board People who actively seek out debate are usually the least likely to change their minds. They're interested in sharpening their debate skills to convince others, rather than seeking guidance for themselves. The people open to truth, but ignorant of it, won't be advertising themselves as potential students. How could they advertise if they don't know what…
/r/TheRedPill01/10/13 12:37 AM
1

You are dead on. A girl being upset that her partner is enjoying her body is not healthy.
/r/seduction20/09/13 01:52 AM
-2

our fault Speak for yourself. You're not anyone's spokesman.
/r/seduction20/09/13 01:50 AM
2

Whether or not it's a "bad thing" has little if anything to do with whether or not it's effective game.
/r/seduction12/09/13 09:33 PM
10

I'd rather my child have a lower IQ and know right-from-wrong than to be a fucking smartass. Spanking a child as punishment doesn't teach them right-from-wrong. It teaches them to avoid the punishment.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/13 12:01 AM
2

If the person in question is used to being objectified, and conceives of their SMV in terms of their outward appearance, then how a girl looks and how a girl thinks of herself will be similar.
/r/seduction26/08/13 09:42 PM
1

if we end up being boyfriend and girlfriend Phrased as if this is something that might happen to him, rather than something that he will do. He is taking a spectator's role in his life rather than taking control.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/13 04:41 AM
6

In order of appearance: Original Poster Mystery Method Mark Manson (thanks /u/shitfuckd) Average Frustrated Chump Pick Up Artist Original Gangster When in doubt, just google "<acronym> urban dictionary".
/r/seduction05/08/13 09:48 PM
4

Here's a torrent link for you: http://mgnet.me/ipqE1
/r/seduction01/08/13 03:50 AM
2

The only problem I have with the HB system is that attractiveness is incredibly biased. Basically everything in social interaction is incredibly biased.
/r/seduction09/07/13 02:11 PM
10

Much more useful to focus on the things that can be changed, rather than the things that can't. Good for you for pointing this out.
/r/seduction02/07/13 08:04 PM
6

"...money earned by men." What's so backwards about this is the standard being used to determine if these women are making enough money. They compare the pay they get with the pay men get, rather than comparing the pay they get with the work they do. Even if parity with men would leave them underpaid, that would be enough to satisfy them. It's a self-imposed glass ceiling.
/r/askTRP26/06/13 04:52 PM
5

Increases the supply, decreases the total combined price (in money, time, effort, emotional investment, etc. combined).
/r/TheRedPill23/06/13 03:15 AM
1

Do you identify as an introvert, like I do? For me it seems like my thoughts aren't necessarily linguistically expressed; language is more of an interpretation mechanism for my thoughts rather than the actual substrate of thought, which would explain why thinking about ideas and linguistically expressing ideas seem like disjointed processes for me.
/r/seduction20/06/13 08:02 PM
1

I am the same way. My initial guess would be that it has something to do with me being relatively unable to intentionally think about what I'm saying as I'm saying it. Do you get that too?
/r/seduction20/06/13 07:40 PM
3

I actually have no experience with LTRs and haven't really made much progress with women in general. But I have spent the last few years learning to be comfortable with myself which has translated to the confidence I need to face women. Five years ago I could definitely not have said that. Taking me out of the game leaves more girls for you. Ridiculous. This ain't a competition. :)
/r/seduction15/03/13 03:41 AM
1

Well I hope you enjoy the success you're looking for, even if I don't know the right advice to give.
/r/seduction14/03/13 11:27 PM
12

Sounds like you've got some things to work on for yourself before you start working on attracting others. Be happy with who you are first, and the rest will come easier.
/r/seduction14/03/13 10:40 PM
9

No, I'm not saying to be disinterested. I think you should strive to be in a position where you are interested in a positive outcome, but do not mind a negative outcome. You are fine by yourself, but you wouldn't mind some company too. You approach that attractive girl because she seems like a potentially fun addition to your social life, but you're already satisfied with your social life as it is so you have nothing to fear if you strike out. Enjoy success and disregard failure, essentially.
/r/seduction14/03/13 10:30 PM
21

Be interested, but not invested.
/r/seduction14/03/13 10:19 PM
8

How about that part where he said "The cardinal sin of all sins is the abuse of power"? I wonder what north africa and the middle east have to say about that? Or perhaps Bradley Manning?
/r/MensRights18/09/12 02:24 AM
3

Yes, I meant "no good reason". Everyone always has some reason for acting how they do. I figured that was implied.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 01:09 AM
9

There are some statements that are far less civil than saying "fuck you", yet are not readily identifiable as profanity. Claiming that one has a right to destroy property for no reason is probably one such statement. OP's interlocutor breached civility before OP did, and I commend OP for not letting her get away with it.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 09:47 PM
11

It cripples the ability for counselors to reach abusive women that need counseling, for one.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:51 AM
2

Why vote?
/r/MensRights05/08/12 11:07 PM
9

Godwin's law ain't a fallacy.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 04:51 PM
0

You've got the argument backwards. Feminists have a toe hold (in society) here, so expanding the government gives them more power. Expanding the government doesn't necessarily give any group in particular a toe hold. It just gives whatever groups that have toe holds more power.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:39 AM
5

Yes, that is a pretty good example of privilege. You've gone beyond merely citing imprisonment rates and included information about the rate that the crime is committed as well. That's what was missing from Jahonay's comment.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:08 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/vrn3h/to_rfeminism_heres_whats_wrong_with_reddit/c579xzw
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:06 PM
2

Read what I wrote carefully. I did not claim that women are not privileged compared to men in terms of imprisonment rates. I only claimed that merely citing imprisonment rates is not sufficient evidence of privilege. The rate of criminal behavior would have to be accounted for before one could make that determination.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:03 PM
8

I completely understand the effect of the definition of "crime" has here. My guess was based on what I've seen of actual violent aggression, rather than definitional "crimes", committed disproportionately by men. Anyway, the point is that simply citing lowest prisoner rate is not sufficient evidence of privilege. I bet if you look at the demographic of atheistic pacifists, you'd see an incredibly low imprisonment, but they're not enjoying "privilege" due to how the law treats their demographic; …
/r/MensRights29/06/12 06:27 AM
5

I have no doubt that's the case. From what I've seen, men certainly get the short end of the stick in our justice system. I just want to be sure the right kinds of statistics are being used to justify that position. Raw imprisonment rates do not count.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 05:35 AM
11

That only counts as privilege if they don't also have the lowest rate of criminal behavior. I'd be willing to bet that males engage in criminal behavior more often than women.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:40 AM
0

See: all forms of government ever.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:50 PM
2

Good luck getting the state to hold its own members liable for actions the state has condoned.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 01:08 PM
1

How about neither?
/r/MensRights01/05/12 01:02 PM
1

This results in a better outcome for everyone. If this were true, why do taxes have to be collected by force? Why couldn't we replace the system with a voluntary single-mothers charity? Clearly sharing the burden forcing someone to support a child that is not theirs. These are still the same thing, only now you're forcing millions of people rather than just one. How about not forcing anyone, except proven biological parents, to support the child?
/r/MensRights01/05/12 01:02 PM
1

hopefully directly from some sap rather than through tax dollars Wait, these are different things?
/r/MensRights01/05/12 12:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter