TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KrytenKoro Archive

View 0 posts and 54 comments by KrytenKoro on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Like Casey Anthony. Like Karla Homolka. Like Gypsy Rose Blanchard. Like Diane Downs. Problem is, none of those murderers killed men. The analogy doesn't hold -- male suitors are certainly fucked up and monstrous, but they're not choosing their own destruction by pursuing these women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 02:40 PM
1

...ragebait? Like, this is the fakest one ive ever seen. There absolutely are abusive wives, there absolutely are abusively trad wives, but they don't talk like this. For one, evangelicals dont have nuns, and for two, she seems awful uninterested in God or pastors for someone so angry about her husband not being trad enough. This is clearly written by a non Christian trying to rile reddit up.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 11:01 PM
1

Those were blatant dog whistles, you know they were dog whistles (and explicitly admitted that you'd already been told they were dogwhistles ("spreading hate") before reposting it here) and this isn't even a rare occurrence in this community.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:31 PM
1

The race of this, Mr. Thugnificent wasn’t stated in the post You can't possibly think anyone is stupid enough to fall for that.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 04:32 PM
1

It's not going to be my ass on the line when Mr. Thugnificent decides to get fistalicious with his flavor of the month Oh wow. Just, wow. Y'all can't even pretend you actually care about all races of men, huh.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 10:00 PM
1

"some" lol.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 09:57 PM
0

Literally everyone who has replied to my posts has posted some aggressively misogynist shit, and my posts were just along the lines of "this is literally scientifically inaccurate, and it is easy to confirm as such". So, no.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/19 05:27 PM
1

I literally just had someone on this sub claim to me that women are physically unable to spread their genes, and that's why women who have multiple partners should be looked down on. So, bullshit on your "we just want equality" claim. Maybe some of you do. OP's claim isn't false, though. But people like you no longer want equality, you want more rights than men and you want no consiquences for your actions. For fuck's sake.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/19 05:26 PM
-2

literally the first google result for "matriarchal tribes": https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/g28565280/matriarchal-societies-list/ also, on wikipedia: Anthropological, archaeological and evolutionary psychological evidence suggests that most prehistoric societies were relatively egalitarian, and that patriarchal social structures did not develop until many years after the end of the Pleistocene era, following social and technological developments such as agriculture and domest…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/19 05:12 PM
0

What’s disingenuous about it? The exact thing I describes. You used that word, I don’t think it means what you think it means. Assuming a pose of naïveté to make a point or for deception. It means exactly how I fucking used it. You're claiming you're not making an argument that you're still waggling a finger at it and shouting "look over here at this argument!"
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/19 05:06 PM
0

Congrats, you just made my argument. They made the exact opposite of your argument. Women are just as biologically driven to spread their genes by creating children as anyone else.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/19 05:04 PM
-1

They cant spread them. Lol. ...Do you not know what spreading genes means? Like, for fuck's sake, do you think the woman's children don't have their genes? Hell in a handbasket, have none of you ever heard of cases of women pumping out as many children as they can, on par with men? Jesus christ the scientific illiteracy on this site.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/19 05:03 PM
-11

Also, very disingenuous to claim you're not saying they should be shamed, and then claiming that it is ironic self destruction a paragraph down.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/19 12:16 PM
-12

This was literally the design of tribes for tens of thousands of years ...of some tribes. Plenty of others were the reverse, or balanced. Jesus Christ, dude. Do more research than an antivax parent.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/19 12:15 PM
-13

Women are biologically driven to choose partners who have solid genes to ensure her genes are passed to a successful child. They are supposed to be lucky to improve the next generation. As such, a woman with a high number is showing she doesn’t value herself or her genes by letting so many partners take a shot. That's...not how genetics works. Women are trying to spread their genes too, dude. Have you taken any biology courses, ever?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/19 12:12 PM
1

to breach a contract A slave isn't in contract to their master. That's a violation of the basic definition of a contract -- if you can't consent to it in the first place, it's not valid, no matter what it says. An arranged marriage where the husband or bride had no choice in the matter is not a valid contract between the husband and bride. It's therefore not a marriage in which "cheating" could definitionally occur. your morality is based on a very specific tradition in a very specific time Cons…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/18 01:36 PM
1

You, sir, are boringly terrible at logic. Mkay. I wasn't wondering, but now I'm concerned that you don't know what "begging the question" means.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/18 01:30 PM
1

The first I disagree with the posters, but no actual cheating is confirmed. The second, I'm not sure how you're interpreting that as civil.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/18 10:48 PM
1

That's BS. You brought it up as a counterexample to the moral axiom being discussed in this post. It's not context less.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/18 10:45 PM
2

Go read the relationships sub, then. Happens a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/18 10:44 PM
1

So you're saying they're not roasting a guy? No, I'm not. Their response to the man is irrelevant to your claim that they would forgive a woman for cheating or encouraging cheating. And, ironically, you are explicitly proving the opposite of your claim by providing evidence that they are outraged by both a man and a woman who cheated. I'm saying it's either ignorant or dishonest to claim that they would treat criticism of a woman as "slut shaming", with literally the exact quotes you provided. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 11:13 PM
3

Some people are genuinely nice just because they are, not because they're not in positions where they could be rude. Absolutely. There's nothing forcing celebrities to be absolute fucks. But a ton of them are, because they lack any inner principles, and no longer have society imposing boundaries on them. The sad truth is that a huge amount of people lack any actual principles or meaningful morality, and that the only reason they pretend to is because of consequences to their actions imposed by t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 11:09 PM
0

war? bondage? slavery? I'm not sure how much clearer "self-defense" can be made. The Rape of Nanking was murder. The Battle of Gettysburg was not. Is that really a hard line to understand for you? would you say it’s immoral if i killed Hitler in 1931? Are you doing it because you like killing men with mustaches, or are you doing it to save lives? Seriously, "self-defense" is a basic legal doctrine recognized the world over. There's definitely some variations in exactly how it's defined, but ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 11:06 PM
0

furthermore, what about arranged marriage adultery? If you physically do not have the ability to break up in the first place, and you were forced into the relationship, it's not really "marriage", is it? There's no consent involved there. absurd and empty morality designed to make yourself feel better imo as opposed to trying to make up excuses for why cheating is totally okay, and comparing a guy who habitually cheats on his friend's sisters friend to an arranged marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 11:03 PM
1

But sure enough, they are roasting a guy for cheating. Never claimed they wouldn't. ...they're roasting the poster, who is female. Then take woman cheating on a guy, and suddenly criticizing her is apparently slut shaming dude, are you actually illiterate? The commentors explicitly tell her that she's going to hell, and they hope she suffers. They call her a heifer, for fuck's sakes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 11:00 PM
1

I mean...yeah, the metaphor works. People definitely have destroyed their lives and families chasing after sex. Both men and women do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 10:31 PM
1

Seriously though, people pined over the Boston Bombers. Charles Manson got love letters. It's A Thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 10:09 PM
4

Sure, but I have seen people explicitly state that they banged a guy because he was an asshole, and they were attracted to that. It's not just the canard of confidence, etc. Just like many guys are attracted to "fixer-uppers", so are many women. Sometimes it's just a coincidence that they are ignoring for other things (looks, money), but a lot of the time it's to fuel their own dysfunctions, munchausen's-style stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 10:07 PM
5

In my experience, it's kind of the other way around -- those who finish last act nicer, those who finish first don't feel the need to play nice. So, celebrities, politicians, CEOs -- they don't get chosen by being awful, they just...find that they no longer really have to respect boundaries. It's like setting a dog loose, and it becomes feral. When you put someone on a pedestal, and start treating them like they can do no wrong...they usually believe you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 10:03 PM
2

an incapability of understanding strong male friendships. I have almost exclusively strong male friendships, and we are constantly holding each other to a higher standard. When did "being manly" devolve from stern-jawed integrity and Greatest Generation-style resoluteness to..."ah naw he made my girl angry at me by telling the truth, what a terrible friend"?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 10:01 PM
3

I seriously doubt you've read /r/relationships if you think that's the case. They hate cheating, almost above all other things. Gender doesn't matter. https://iy.reddit.com/r/relationships/comments/8ojsnj/is_once_a_cheater_always_a_cheater_true/ Example this -- the sub tells a female poster that she is going to hell, and is dogshit of a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 09:51 PM
2

BP part is that if roles were reversed, advice would absolutely condone hiding it. That is some rank dogshit, bro. That sub is virulent about hating cheating. Seriously, actually read it for once. I have personally been on threads where the sub walked a woman through breaking up with her longtime friend who was fucking a married guy. i.e., the friend wasn't even the one cheating. EDIT: https://iy.reddit.com/r/relationships/comments/8ojsnj/is_once_a_cheater_always_a_cheater_true/ There you go. Ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 09:49 PM
1

...you're the one shaming people here!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 09:48 PM
1

... still not sure exactly... Integrity and to try to encourage society to not just be a bunch of moral degenerates. then you are a bad friend who lacks loyalty. Good friends don't hand their junkie friend another needle when they see he's ODing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 09:46 PM
1

Cheating doesn't become acceptable. It's really easy to just say "fuck off, I don't want to be with you anymore". Murder doesn't either, although killing in self defense isn't murder. Theft is only okay when it's to save a life. Caveat to all of these being that they are forgivable if the person actually shows remorse and betters themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 09:45 PM
3

How is it pathetic? Seriously, in which moral system is it a good thing to support men or women that betray their loved ones? I've heard bad things about the red pill before, but fuck, that was never one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 09:43 PM
4

They see the world in black and white and expect people to white knight for random girls over their besties. ...and to "white knight" for random guys. Which shows that they're not equipped to give life advice. It is utterly bizarre to me to see someone who is seemingly for red pilling equate integrity with being blue pilled. I almost always see the red pill guys criticizing women and their "white knights" as being liars who cover up misdeeds...and yet here you are explicitly supporting such beha…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 09:42 PM
1

...right, that's called begging the question. You are insisting X, and when asked what evidence you have that it's X, you respond "are you stupid?! It's obviously X! Because of X! How can you not understand that?!" That is stunningly irrational.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 09:34 PM
1

You fail to understand why crime rates are down. Because you're insisting on begging the question over and over, instead of providing evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 12:31 PM
0

Sure, because the subjugation and genocide of other people is a fundamental part of Nazism. It's part of the definition. It's not even just a side effect of Nazism, it's the goal. The subjugation and genocide of men is, at best, a fundamental part of TERFs (and even then it's not all TERFs, though I'll happily agree with you that TERFs are assholes). Which are very, very much a minority of the groups that call themselves feminism, and are pretty strongly hated by the rest of the feminists, becau…
/r/MensRights23/03/18 11:36 AM
1

Same reason the tops of most wide-tent organizations are hypocritical and two-faced -- it's the nature of being at the top, is that you're trying to appeal to many conflicting groups. Like, yeah, Linda Sarsour is an asshole. Donna Hylton should never have been at the women's march. The same pretty much goes for any other mainstream group. Yeah, it's definitely something that should be improved, but it's also far and away not unique to feminism.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 11:34 AM
1

I mean, no, that's categorically untrue. TERFs are a small subset of modern feminists that are pretty much opposed by all the rest of the feminists. I mean, I'm not going to claim that every mainstream feminist is completely logically consistent, but the specific claim you are making is simply not true for the bulk of feminism.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 11:31 AM
0

Mkay? I'm still a feminist.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 11:29 AM
-8

mkay buddy, that sounds totally rational and not at all generalizing.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 10:13 PM
0

You're thinking TERFs. TERFs are the ones who hate men and transgenders.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 09:58 PM
4

I mean, I'm a feminist, and I absolutely think this needs to be equalized. I can't speak for the big-name feminists, in fairness.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 09:58 PM
1

And yet we see Milo and others get 'deplatformed' occasionally.. Twitter doesn't remove shit unless it gets public and ad dollars are at stake.'' Anyone on either side who courts too much controversy has that happen to them. That's my point -- twitter isn't enforcing its stated rules, it's enforcing its public persona.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 03:41 AM
1

I've reported plenty of stuff on both sides talking about how all men need to die, all women need to die, everyone should be raped or put in camps, etc. No matter how flagrantly hate speech it is, on either side, twitter always tells me it's not considered hate speech. And that makes sense, since twitter was created by people who thought google wasn't free speech enough. Twitter doesn't remove shit unless it gets public and ad dollars are at stake.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 05:59 PM
1

I know of specific, personal cases where a parent was deeply abusive and then claimed that the other parent was "alienating the children" and "poisoning their minds against them" when the kids said "no, I don't want to visit you anymore and be abused". (However, I'm not saying that parental alienation doesn't exist -- it certainly does, and is one method an abusive parent will use to keep the kid isolated if their abuse isn't rooted out in time. Just that abusive parents also claim alienation wh…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 04:08 AM
1

Twitter doesn't remove shit one way or the other. It's not about political agenda, they just simply don't care until somebody with money to throw around starts intimidating them about clear malfeasance.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 01:36 AM
2

If he's paying, he deserves at a minimum visitation rights. I agree with you in most cases, except cases of abuse. If one of the parents is abusive, the child should be removed from them, but they should still owe parental obligations (in this case, child support) to the child. Of course, that should go for whether the parent was male or female.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 01:33 AM
35

Disney doesn't protect any of their actors from anything but the most aggressive sexual harassment. Esmeralda got the same treatment. Disney is greed incarnate.
/r/MGTOW13/06/17 11:56 PM
6

Disney did this with Esmeralda, too -- they have a habit of throwing their employees under the bus for a dollar.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 11:55 PM
0

http://www.nytimes.com/1981/03/22/us/women-join-battle-on-all-male-draft.html Since 19-fucking-81. It's like none of you actually read anything but tumblr.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/16 03:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter