TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kwangira Archive

View 0 posts and 126 comments by Kwangira on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm answering his question and my answer for both sexes was already implied in that answer. Your bias is showing, this isn't worthy of a warning at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 03:59 PM
4

Yes, it is harmful for you, any future partner, your family and the community you belong to as a whole. The more partners you have, the more that the most intimate act you can perform with the opposite sex devalues to something akin to a recreational past time, like playing videogames for dopamine rushes. What is supposed to bring two people closer together is offered up mainly for sensual pleasures. Then there's the fact that any intercourse, that isn't the result of a pre-existing deep bond be…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 03:55 PM
1

I wish.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 03:29 PM
1

Good old personality detector, right.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 03:01 PM
1

Men embody every positive human quality, women none. There is your question answered.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 02:31 PM
1

There is nothing positively admirable about women. Negatively, I'd say they are great at dissimulation, manipulation and lying to others, including themselves. The more learn about them, the more I interact with them, the more I come to definitely despise them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 02:10 PM
2

You say that absolutely no study corroborates anything red pillers put forward. One only needs to provide a single study and this absolute statement of yours falls apart else the burden of proof is on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 12:05 PM
3

Only if you squint and ignore the actual findings in favor of your preconceived notions. You apply this to every single thing they claim. I firmly disagree. The burden of proof is on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 11:41 AM
2

Where's the scientific proof that they are right? They've got plenty of studies that serve to corroborate their findings. I don't think I need to link the thread, you're probably familiar with it. What you do is dismiss the red pill altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 11:16 AM
3

Where's your scientific evidence that red pillers are undeniably wrong akin to flat earthers? They're not entirely correct or intutive the way the black pill is correct and intuitive but they have their merit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 10:18 AM
1

That depends on your patience as a man and how well raised the woman in question is. Her "personality" is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 08:36 AM
2

Ok, you're wrong then.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 08:17 AM
1

It's as if incels don't realize the most important thing about a partner is their personality This reads as intentional sarcasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 07:58 AM
-1

You can't. A bluepiller is always either a massive liar(to himself or others) or straight up delusional. They are disgusting people.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 07:43 AM
1

Exactly 0%
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 07:18 AM
4

The only fix is return to a strict Patriarchy. The West is done for though, sit back and enjoy the shitshow.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 03:55 PM
1

You don't address anything, go off on a tangent and then accuse others of having a temper. Your self-awareness couldn't be lower.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 02:32 PM
3

No, I just told you about the unnecessary amount of rhetorical questions. I'm pretty sure you already had this answer in mind when you asked me in your previous comment. Unfortunately for you, you've made yourself look like the extremely biased one here instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 11:38 AM
2

Irritated tone that is identifiable by abuse of rhetorical questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 11:32 AM
2

When did you question my motive? You stated what you thought my post was about. You didnt question me, anything. Either you are unintelligent or deliberately acting obtuse, to call something into question stands synonymous for expressing your doubt. I understand the motives of some men who cheat, have multiple baby mothers, etc. Does it make me respect them? No. But at least its something that when I hear about it i won't throw a fit saying AMALT and dismiss the men that arent like that. I clear…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 11:24 AM
2

Yet you take issue when motives are questioned. Understanding one's motivations through empathy does not mean you respect them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 11:09 AM
2

No, what you're asking for is more sympathy else you wouldn't throw a tantrum like this when motives are questioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 10:51 AM
2

Explain.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 08:35 AM
1

This is an issue of semantics, not facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 08:22 AM
5

No thanks, that is not true. This sounds like a post that's attempting to trick men to become more naive in taking the shitty, mostly worthless anecdotes of women in this subreddit more seriously. Nothing in this post has any relation with empathy. A very empathetic person would be able to notice when a woman is lying through her teeth for more attention and sympathy for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 08:06 AM
18

First part of your post makes the naturalistic fallacy that letting women be ruled by their primitive animal instincts so that they can act like unrestrained horny wild chimps, is necessarily eugenic. No, they are only attracted to the most sexually dimorphic traits. It's female sexual selection gone wild. To draw an illustration, the sable tooth tiger has been hypothesised to go extinct because females selected for the longest sable teeth rendering it less and less practical for hunting. Thanks…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 07:54 AM
1

most Incels I come across use feelz over realz to mean literally anyone with an emotion must be incorrect. You definitely pulled that out of your ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 06:24 AM
0

Safe for Homeros his time of which I'm not sure, women were definitely permitted to write literature in the time of Shakespeare, Tolstoy's and Thomas Mann's. Also, you saying that women are the most successful authors of our generation is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 05:54 AM
1

Another thing I'd like to add. I completely disagree that women have higher emotional intelligence than men. The greatest and most moving writers of all times to name a popular few such as Homeros, Shakespeare, Tolstoj, Thomas Mann needed immense emotional intelligence to create the marvels they've brought forth.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 08:35 PM
4

They seem to conflate rationality with total lack of emotion. This is wrong. Your post is useless. Edit: My impression is that you seem to conflate rationality with lack of emotions and then project this idea onto others. You become more rational, the more you can separate your emotions, not eliminate them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 08:16 PM
7

Point out and name a single logical fallacy I've made. I'm waiting.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 08:00 PM
1

The irony about this comment of yours is that you're exactly proving /u/Ultramegasaurus point by pretending that women put heavy emphasis on the oh-so wonderful personality before the man gets any chance to intercourse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 07:45 PM
6

If you shut up or could raise the effort to actually provide anything convincing against another person's case instead of opting for the lazy strategy of discredit by attribution, you could maybe get a large perspective on the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 07:41 PM
1

Lol, no. If you were correct, you wouldn't hear anybody lay the blame at men's personalities for their lack of romantic success.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 07:35 PM
0

I only say it because 'toxic' has now negative connotations attached to it due to its overabuse by people who treat is as a word to describe anything that personally offends them (or they personally dislike).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 07:28 PM
0

That's not the point of MGTOW but there are men like that in the community.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 07:24 PM
-4

Safe for your application of the useless 'toxic' buzzword, you're correct in your judgement of the red pill but that's not why women dislike it. They lack the self-consciousness to reach such a conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 07:19 PM
9

Females are repulsed by any truth that doesn't benefit them or paints them in a negative light. Simple as that. A woman can not and doesn't value the truth as valuable in itself. Not to say that the red pill is the truth by the way, it's very unintuitive and unnecessarily overbearing for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 07:10 PM
1

Worthless post.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 07:07 PM
3

Most likely it is lack of interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 06:46 PM
1

I'm quite certain I understood your point and you are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 02:25 PM
1

You are literally wrong on that. 100%, utterly, completely, undeniably wrong. That's why I asked you if you were interested in me providing a wash list of studies to put your ignorance on the spot.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 02:14 PM
1

You should not put emphasis on personality and hygiene because it gives the wrong impression that they are decisive in initial mate attraction when the first is a nice bonus while the second is basic decency you shouldn't even mention to anyone who doesn't live under a rock.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 02:00 PM
1

Are you new here? You are so wrong it's not even funny. You unironically mention a variant of "just have a good personality and be hygienic" as if these are deciding factors in mate attraction. It's so ridiculous that this kind of stupidity has been memed to death. I can easily provide you an entire wash list of reputable studies that decimate this delusional nonsense you're repeating. Interested?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 01:44 PM
0

Your comment: "But muh anecdotes and muh feels! > realz"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 01:21 PM
2

Your point is that these women are supposedly more feminine as desired by men when that's not what this study confirms.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/18 09:25 PM
1

Greater gender differences != more feminine women in the traditional sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/18 09:20 PM
1

There is no reason to be impulsive, that's my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/18 09:17 PM
1

It's synonymous for basing your actions on shortsighted quick gratifications. Clearly, you can avoid this by doing the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/18 09:06 PM
1

Because you're impulsively driven.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/18 08:45 PM
1

You're not asking any specific question.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/18 08:39 PM
3

Because there's nothing genuine or valuable about female "kindness".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/18 08:36 PM
1

Redpillers because they're compromised by a majority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/18 07:20 PM
2

Not leftists but liberals. Nothing of value would be lost with the demise of hookup culture, it would be a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/18 07:13 PM
1

14 have voted yes and only one has voted no until now. I can say with certainty now that at least 85% agrees with me even when many more votes are needed. Right now it's an idea and over time support will grow and that's when the chances for implementation grow as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 06:56 PM
1

I made a poll on that site especially for you. Let's wait for the results.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 06:12 PM
1

Yeah, you who's made a quick glance must know better than I who's been around for two years around incels. Incels.is has many more than 500 members, right now there are 150 online.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 05:49 PM
1

I wouldn't be able to give you a number but I suspect a majority of incels.is agrees.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 05:08 PM
1

Nope!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 04:54 PM
3

That's called having a self-respect and not letting yourself be taken advantage of. Anything else is redundant.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 04:52 PM
1

How do you know blackpill’d incels believe this? Because I interact with them on a daily basis. Outside of incels.is, you have large discord communities of them as well. And braincels has some of them too, although a minority. However, saying anything like that gets you banned on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 04:50 PM
4

I'm referring to their autistic theories of shit tests or the alpha/beta dichotomy that demands you to become a dark triad piece of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 04:34 PM
0

Denial is the first step to acceptance.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 04:31 PM
1

We are DONE with "cope" so let's replace it with "Nope!", right?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 04:22 PM
2

The red pill is unintuitive, extremely dogmatic, uncompromising and makes things seem more complicated than they actually are. They have more in common with the bluepillers than with the blackpillers. The red pill has never been really attractive safe for chauvinistic white american dudes. The black pill on the other hand will continue to grow.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 04:05 PM
1

because individual rights matter the most I agree but only when this pertains to moral agents, in other words men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 03:17 PM
-1

You're the one who wants to literally enslave 50% of Humanity because they won't fuck you. Sticking to a certain conviction purely for selfish end goals without eye for the common good is solipsistic and more of a feminine thing. I lurk Braincels and even most of those guys aren't that fucking nuts, just sad virgins. Becoming blackpilled takes time and you go through certain stages but I can assure you that plenty OG incels fully agree with me, even those who have "ascended". The ones who disagr…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 03:01 PM
-2

Thanks, that was very constructive.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 02:47 PM
-1

Blackpilled incels are unapologetic about the removal of female rights and turning them into property because the female sex is (rightfully) considered amoral, alogical, manipulative, dissimulative, hypergamous, lacking a free will and a soul and thus only capable of obeying her primordial drifts. It's not an issue of misunderstanding on the part of incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 02:44 PM
10

Anyone who's a hedonistic and opportunistic degenerate will definitely disagree with JP on pretty much everything, not to say that the man is always right but he's made valid points.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 02:08 PM
1

Truth hurts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 12:14 PM
1

You probably think you sound smart It sounds more to me like you're thinking this. all you're doing is dodging a discussion you don't wanna have Beautiful groundless accusation mister troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 12:09 PM
1

If you're a dishonest provocative troll why should anything you assert be taken seriously? If you desperately want to tread the pathetic infantile route of attaching credibility to one's assumed integrity instead through assessing the presented arguments, you're already on the losing side.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 11:56 AM
1

It's like I'm talking to an unconscious robot because this totally predictive and unintelligent answer has already been invalidated in my two previous responses. Intellectual honesty must be incredibly repulsive for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 11:36 AM
1

That was clearly a rhetorical question. I see already you're more of the provocative and less of intellectually honest type. Anyway, I refuse to answer for the reason that whether I'm incel or not has nothing to do with the argument at hand nor would it prove any counterargument against mine more right.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 10:52 AM
1

Very weak response and more of a projection from your part that anyone who does not endorse a certain pattern of action is compelled that way by his circumstances, it's basically denial of free will and self-reflection. I'm sure you're a very impulsive type who mainly obeys his carnal drifts and lacks anything that resembles long term thinking if that's the only inference you can make.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 10:38 AM
1

Yes, women are vapid lesser humans I've already said this. Men aren't the same at all as long as the woman in question isn't physically deformed or mentally deficient.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 08:49 AM
1

Because anyone who's against liberalism must be part of that one and only other team within your small western sphere of thought? I'm not even American. You're not correcting me for shit, you're only showcasing that you have a very limited perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 08:46 AM
1

Was this your attempt of making a "subtle" jab towards me by assuming I'm an American Conservative republican and economic liberal? Or is it a random out of the blue rant?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 08:40 AM
1

That doesn't make it any better if her initial reason is totally vapid and humiliating for who you are as a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 08:29 AM
1

This isn't about "happiness", it's long term thinking for the good of those beyond your own generation. Not something you or liberals in general are very good at, keep selfishly pursuing your YOLO dogma.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 08:22 AM
0

I don't believe in premarital sex, maybe you have an idea now.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 08:16 AM
1

Ah yes, the Liberal positivist belief that history is a linear progress of humanity so that you can accuse anyone who doesn't agree of being an archaic nut because nearly everything was supposedly worse for people in the past. Very original, intelligent, objective and well educated from your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 08:13 AM
0

I'm sorry you prefer people to act more like feral bonobo's instead of humans with stable families.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 08:20 PM
1

I don't trust you enough (or anyone else here) to carry out honest moderation that's why I ask you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 04:42 PM
1

I've had exactly three comments I can agree on that may fall under "incivility". Point out the rest and present me your reasons or else you're just flaunting your bias. Other than that, what is the limit of "uncivilized comments" you're allowed to make before a temporary ban is issued? Exactly 4?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 04:40 PM
-2

Ye, just adopt the empty-headed idea of what enough people believe to be right must be right regardless of its truthfullness. Or better yet, don't address anything. Bring the other in discredit by invalidating any inference he makes through lazy character assassination.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 04:37 PM
1

lso how can you “be sure” of a relationship before you’re actually in it. By getting to know the person before you enter the relationship and not jump into one after a mere 2 months. I say that approximately one year is appropriate before making it official. What would be a worthwhile reason for ending a relationship? Anything that is worthy of lawful punishment.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 04:26 PM
0

Very convincing and nuanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 04:22 PM
-1

The majority of relationships have an expiration date. Make sure to add that's primarily the case in the Western liberal countries of decadent and repugnant nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 04:01 PM
5

No, it can not under any circumstance with the sole exception of death. Don't enter a relationship you're not certain of and don't break it off when inevitable tensions occur. A sustainable relationship is and always has been hard because it continiously demands you to work on yourself. Anything else is lowering yourself to a wild impulsive lecherous chimp.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 03:40 PM
-1

A female isn't capable of self-reflection and will only judge an aspect of herself negatively if it's the same aspect her entourage scoffs at because the idea of a personal set of morals is totally foreign to the female as they entirely lack a moral compass in the first place. They are quite literally subhuman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 03:00 PM
1

Wrong. There is nothing undignified about an appropriate insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 02:38 PM
1

Not true. women are attracted to a combination of traits. But as a first attraction you have to get her attention with something looks, wealth. If you have wealth chances are pretty high that you are intelligent as well. Sexual success is inversely correlated with intelligence, women do not give a shit if you're smart as long as you aren't retarded. Women are mostly boring shallow creatures who are incapable of appreciating any form of depth, that's what you have male friends for. That is true, …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 02:09 PM
1

You dont think that succes is one of the key factors in attracting women? Is it humilating if its because you are ripped? Or smart? It is a key factor in attracting stupid vapid women who are mainly driven by their instinctual drifts like an animal which is 99,99999% of them, yes. Oh, quick edit. Women are not attracted to intelligent men. Attraction is superficial, I dont see why wealth is more humilating than say looks. Sexual attraction is. However friendship (to turn back on the example) is …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 01:46 PM
1

Imagine if someone wants to befriend you mainly because of your wealth instead of your character to put it in perspective, it is humiliating. So why not on the level of a relationship? Now, I realise that women are vapid lesser humans who are incapable of anything like exploration beyond the surface. It is best then that they are treated as property so that a more rational male guardian makes the choice for them in let's say an arranged marriage, the chosen man will always retain his right to de…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 01:05 PM
6

That is yawningly obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 12:43 PM
7

To take an extreme example, you think that being a cuck because you're in relationship is preferable to being single?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 12:38 PM
9

It's better to stay celibate than to degrade yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 11:30 AM
1

Yeah, there's no debating with a trousered ape who believes in the subjectivity of morals.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 11:22 AM
1

Oh ok, in other words you have no concept of dignity or a relation with the idea of behaving as someone with self-respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 11:11 AM
2

What point are you trying to make? Aren't you doing exactly the same by this reasoning?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 10:56 AM
3

You mean trofee wives? What is dignified about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 10:51 AM
3

Ascension is a myth.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 10:47 AM
1

It's not ascension for a man with self-respect but rather a descension.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 10:45 AM
10

If you just want to pump and dump like a degenerate, the most straightforward option is to pay for a whore.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 10:42 AM
37

No man with a shred of dignity is interested in gold diggers.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 10:35 AM
1

It's simple. Women are undoubtedly the inferior sex in every respect. It's like being called a chimp or a dog if a man is called a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 06:01 AM
1

Imagine being this retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 05:52 AM
1

The narrative exists because the West in its current state is exceptionally decadent and degenerate after its embrace of the most soulless and moronic ideology called liberalism(enlightenment values), so any excessive indulgence is excused next to being cheered on as long as 'nobody gets hurt' with the eye for the common good flushed down the drain. Your question carries the undertone that shaming someone's sexual past is always bad because 'people should be able to do what they want and have fu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 05:50 AM
2

I misunderstood, that's not the point of this thread anyway. Make your own thread and I'll give you a detailed response some time.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 11:58 AM
1

I already have. I've noticed that I have to repeat myself a lot when arguing with women, I don't know whether it's because you are stupid or because you're looking to catch me off guard by making me ramble as much as possible so that you can nitpick a minor consistency.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 11:53 AM
1

Understanding which emotions he's experiencing is not the same as experiencing those emotions yourself in that given moment to make sure we're on the same page here. Empathy is accompanied by respect and humility for another because you know you can't break the boundaries that make you and him two different persons.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 11:49 AM
0

Nothing about your comment is logical. If you accept the premise that women are solipsists then women lacking total and utter empathy is the inevitable conclusion. Instead of fighting the conclusion, why don't you present arguments against the solipsistic nature of woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 11:34 AM
0

Nothing about your comment is logical. If you accept the premise that women are solipsists then women lacking total and utter empathy is the inevitable conclusion. Instead of fighting the conclusion, why don't you present arguments against the solipsistic nature of woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 11:33 AM
1

Empathy stands synonymous for the recognition of a someone's totality, his inner universe, understand him for who he is by virtue of his individuality. Now, you can not recognize something you haven't identified before. It is then an absolute requirement for you to have a full consciousness of your own person and you can only have a lucid awareness of your inner being by staying true to yourself, in other words respect yourself. This gives you the ability to distinguish and recognise the same pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 11:29 AM
1

He is wrong. Empathy can not be restrictive (article implies women can not have empathy for men) but it is all encompassing as long as you can recognise your object of empathy as an individuality and that can only happen when you have a strong consciousness of your own individuality or you wouldn't understand the idea of individuality. The weaker that consciousness, the harder it is to elicit empathy for another.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 10:50 AM
2

I just did define it. Do I need to repeat myself or is that you don't understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 09:59 AM
1

No, she judges her entire "character" strictly from the external.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 09:57 AM
2

Negate how I've explained solipsism in my first paragraph of my first comment and there you have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 09:44 AM
0

Replace solipsism with a strong sense sense of being rooted in your own individuality from which you derive your self-worth and your title would be correct. Unfortunately women are entirely lacking in that aspect because a woman can only view herself through the lens of others and judges others by that same standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 09:15 AM
4

Wrong. Solipsism is the result of not being able to relate to others because you lack a frame of inner reference so that you are unable to identify a similar individuality in another person grounded on your own individuality as inner reference. It comes down to having a lower consciousness, like an animal. This is corroborated with the fact that an animal can not act ethically towards other beings as it will never understand the golden rule of morality known as 'act as you would have others act …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 09:06 AM
1

Recognizing that females are overall inferior because they experience the world on a lower plane of consciousness, are characterless, alogical, amoral, more suggestible, that they're basically soulless beings with a closer relation to wild animals going off on instinct than a human being (men) with a free will has no relation to misogyny. Such an accusation serves as a detraction from positing arguments by attacking the integrity of the one accused.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 03:53 PM
1

Nothing of value will be lost if it is actually females that are keeping this dumpster fire of a subreddit alive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 03:09 PM
1

I would also say that the presence of females strongly diminishes any sense of direction in this subreddit because of how easily they take personal offence, are nonsensical and all around extremely averse to the truth which results in this nauseating mish mash of endless irrelevant anecdotes that ought to validate anything they feel strong towards. Ban every female and the quality of discussion will increase tenfold which will still be low though.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 02:59 PM
3

Retards stroking their ego by assuming overly pedantic tones and elevating their personal experiences above everyone else's by shouting the loudest or writing enough bullshit in one huge autistic wall of text without a drop of substance. This entire subreddit is arguing against anecdotes, for anecdotes, with anecdotes. It's a low IQ subreddit for low IQ people who pretend to be smart.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 01:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter