TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Kyteno Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by Kyteno on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

_> It is pretty annoying. I understand that men are more comfortable when they take up space. But if you take up more than a seat, you're being inconsiderate. On one hand, this isn't that big a deal, but acting like people telling you to not be douchebags is the worst thing in the world is also pretty annoying. If you have room, then do what you want. If someone wants to sit down or even walks past that open seat next to you, adjust so they can sit down. This is pretty pathetic. >_> probably why…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 01:02 AM
3

"Hi." and "Good Morning" Is not harassment, nor it even catcalling. I don't know why people keep saying this. Regardless of whether their intent is to get into your pants or not. Harassment has to be aggressive and catcalling has to be inherently sexual. Most of the people that she showed, even combing through the 100 comments she received in 10 hours, were generally innocuous. Also, I don't see the inherent problem with catcalling anyway other than the fact that it is rude and (ineffective). I …
/r/MensRights30/10/14 07:37 PM
1

Also, women do the same thing to men.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 04:21 AM
1

I disagree mostly. Men would look at women for their looks no matter what they wear or whether their pictures were on the web. However, I don't think this is a bad thing. It's no less shallow than evaluating someone based on their mind, or their success. After all, beauty, sexual attractiveness is a feature, and such is a feature. It should be expect that people notice things that are appealing to them and look at them longer than things they find relatively unappealing. But objectification is m…
/r/MensRights09/10/14 04:21 AM
2

Yeah, you could basically do this with anything. Showing some successful African Americans in new york next to a homeless caucasian. Racism is over guys, mission accomplished. It would not change the fact that African americans suffer larger penalties for the same crimes. That being said, it is definitely true that while men are on the top, they are also on the bottom.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 09:19 PM
1

This worries me. It should not be an even split. Logically of all cases, most of them should be indeterminable, and a minority should be false and slightly more should be true accusations (This can partially be attributed to the fact it's hard to prove someone made a false allegation). In most cases of rape, the courts cannot tell for sure who is telling the truth so the accused goes free. So I seriously question a study that splits between 2 categories of black and white.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 01:14 PM
1

yeah
/r/MensRights04/10/14 01:08 PM
1

k
/r/MensRights04/10/14 08:06 AM
9

This is a logical fallacy. Just because most of the time patriarchy was in place does not mean that in its absence we would not have arrived the place we are now or a better place. Always be careful about using arguments like that because its easy to tear arguments like that down. You could say "slavery was GOOD, without slavery..." "colonialism was GOOD, without colonialism". We're at a good place now and we did bad things in the past, but saying that everything in the past that we did is good …
/r/MensRights04/10/14 07:33 AM
2

Eh. Now I don't like either of them. I hope that was his goal. Instead of trying to discredit all of Stefan's arguments by flat out debunking them, he's simply pointing out that he doesn't like him because of views he doesn't like. I do not know what this has to do with men's rights. I disagree with him about anarchy in general, but his men's rights views are on point. Just because a person has one set of views that are bad does not mean all of their views are bad. I don't care about Anarchists …
/r/MensRights03/10/14 11:49 PM
20

That's the thing. I'm not particularly outraged when a 16 year old female has consent with older men either. I wouldn't do it, but like I said, they're arbitrary rules. The problem comes with hypocrisy. So you'll have to forgive me if I cannot get outraged on behalf of this young boy... I wouldn't get outraged on the behalf of a female either. I simply don't think of it as a big deal.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:51 PM
3

Age restrictions on things are arbitrary at best. Assuming he actually liked the teachers he'll be more traumatized by the legal proceedings and such than the actual act.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:11 AM
2

“So what kind of message does this send to the millions of girls and women the U.S. national team has empowered and inspired over the past couple of decades? That alleged domestic violence is somehow different and less alarming when the alleged abuser is a woman?” What about the message it sends to boys and men? I mean, I understand what they're thinking and it's fine, but even the rhetoric isn't inclusive.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 01:18 AM
1

She seems like she would make a fantastic fiction writer.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 07:43 PM
2

I don't think any society has ever flourished over the rule of one group of people over another based on genitalia, race, religious belief, sexual preference, or any other arbitrary quality that has nothing to do with ruling. I wonder if they are going to actually put forward evidence. I wonder if men should have a debate about whether society flourished more under male rule. No wait, that would be misogyny.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 01:25 PM
3

What? No. It's quite literally based on things that republicans literally say. How do you even know that I'm liberal? You literally made that up. I'm sorry politicians in the republican party say hateful things and their pundits say bad things as well. Keep in mind, when I say "Republicans" I am not saying "All Republicans". I'm saying a loud possible minority of republicans. To fix this, moderate conservatives need to show the same outrage that I expect moderate liberals to show when democrats …
/r/MensRights27/09/14 01:51 PM
6

Yeah but Republicans hate gays, atheists, women's right to choose, the poor, minorities, and pretty much everything else that I think it was important. Yeah hyper liberalism is effectively a haven for feminism, but you need to understand that on pretty much every other social issue democrats stomp on republicans. I lose either way. Ah the life of a moderate african-american atheist.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 11:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter