| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ever given it a thought that how a lot of feminists think women should be able to have an abortion at any time, is really suggesting of their strife for female supremacy?While it may not be relevant towards the state of its existence. It's relevant on the topic grounds of personhood. Giving an unfeeling, non sentient organism more personhood than a living being is crossing dangerous ground. Which is what I was initially discussing. Surely there is a massive difference between an 8 week old embryo and a 2 month old infant. This difference between cognitive functioning, feeling and sentience is really the most important information regarding the topic. My reasonin… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/16 07:50 AM |
| 1 | Ever given it a thought that how a lot of feminists think women should be able to have an abortion at any time, is really suggesting of their strife for female supremacy?Sure. Even bacteria and viruses are considered living organisms. But that still doesn't change the fact that a lack of brain activity is classified as clinically dead. Nor does that mean an embryo is sentient and equal with a man or woman. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/16 06:33 AM |
| 1 | Getting reports that taxpayer-funded BBC drama 'War and Peace' tonight features scenes of 'ripped' naked men. Male objectification ok is it?I've seen plenty of vaginas on late night television but never a penis. But we're talking about shirtless men and women in bikinis. Not genitalia. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/16 05:37 AM |
| 1 | Ever given it a thought that how a lot of feminists think women should be able to have an abortion at any time, is really suggesting of their strife for female supremacy?Actually it is. You can google or ask any medical professional or scientist. An embryo or zygote does not have a fully functioning brain. It's not classified as living on that fact. The same as how brain dead people on life support are considered clinically and legally dead. "Potential life" and "living thing" are not synonymous. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/16 05:27 AM |
| 1 | Getting reports that taxpayer-funded BBC drama 'War and Peace' tonight features scenes of 'ripped' naked men. Male objectification ok is it?Sure it is. Since men and media are never going to stop objectifying women at every turn. At least they could make men objectified at the same rate. When was the last time you saw a half naked man suggestively eating something as promotion for a new item at a food joint? Never. Media had been catching up to showing both genders cleaning and parenting (though not quite the same rate, but it's progress!) so the least they can do is portray both equally as sex objects. I'd like to say that no one s… | /r/MensRights | 01/02/16 04:59 AM |
| 1 | Ever given it a thought that how a lot of feminists think women should be able to have an abortion at any time, is really suggesting of their strife for female supremacy?Many women do not receive abortions due to a superiority complex. And comparing rape to abortion is just silly. Rape actually causes harm to living, sentient beings. A zygote, fetus etc is not scientifically or medically considered living. I've also never heard of anyone advocating for "5 minute before birth abortions". While I advocate for women to be granted access to abortions for whatever reason. I personally can't nor do I know anyone, who advocates for third trimester abortions. Should the… | /r/MensRights | 01/02/16 04:49 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter