TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

L1et_kynes Archive

View 0 posts and 56 comments by L1et_kynes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It's because people who have been on this subreddit a long time lose interest in having the same discussions with people who share similar views.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 08:59 PM
2

No. Personally I think that the MRA agenda helps women more than feminism. There are many areas where feminism plays loose with the facts and you can't solve any issue unless you understand why it is occurring. In addition in think improved communication between the genders benefits both genders.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:50 AM
1

There are very few feminists there. And you are allowed to say most things. There are different ways to say the truth.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 06:23 PM
2

There are certain rules you have to follow if you want to post there. Figuring them out is not rocked science. It isn't a safe space it just tries to enforce some rules to keep things semi-polite and to keep feminists engaged.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:01 PM
5

There is a lot of "common knowledge" about gender that turns out to be false upon closer inspection. Without challenging and engaging with the evidence it is difficult to fully understand the MRA perspective. I recommend you try femra debates if you are interested in learning more about gender issues because the discussion here often presumes a certain level of knowledge.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 11:10 PM
1

Personally, I believe that we shouldn't help people based on racist or sexist biases we have. Perhaps that is just me.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:04 AM
0

That we should give funding based on the need without giving it specially to groups based on gender or race.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 03:50 AM
1

So it is okay to deliberately exclude people of races I don't like from my charity efforts? Okay.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 03:27 AM
4

So what if I raise money to help white victims of cancer? Is that a good thing?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:02 AM
0

No, because there is already money going to people with breast cancer.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:02 AM
3

The money doesn't go to help the people who need it more?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:11 AM
5

Johnson concluded that men were more likely to be intimate terrorists by asking questions only to women in DV shelters and generalizing from that sample to the entire population. Women are generally more likely to get injured but that is most likely because men are stronger, so if a man loses his temper a few times it could easily lead to serious harm, but if a woman loses her temper 100 times she might not be able to physically hurt the man as badly. Look at the ray rice thing. She hits him for…
/r/MensRights07/12/14 06:14 PM
1

done.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 03:35 AM
1

www.np.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/2oe8by/what_are_your_thoughts_on_rolling_stone/
/r/MensRights06/12/14 09:46 PM
1

There is a post on askwomen where people are still believing the story.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 09:22 PM
2

4.8 and 7% that cannot be accounted for. That isn't accounted for. Because there are factors that don't differ between the genders and that aren't accounted for it would be surprising if the wage gap vanished.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 05:35 PM
1

I don't really agree with the elimination of sentencing ranges.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 04:21 PM
-2

Hit him and yelled at him repeatedly for about an hour before the incident.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 11:33 PM
2

Sure. But to say the whole thing is due to discrimination is silly.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 04:36 AM
1

I can't nail down it accounting for ALL factors Well then you don't have much reason to think that any gap you have left is due to discrimination then do you?
/r/MensRights26/11/14 04:14 AM
2

Oh you are referring to the initial factoid and not the overall point of the study? Well I can't see anywhere what that study controlled for. If it didn't control for hours worked, benefits, danger of the work done, and willingness to relocate (to name a few) then it isn't comparing the same work.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 02:52 AM
1

If masculine thought is promoted that is because women want to hear that POV. Women have at least as much control over what the media shows as men, because if people don't watch something it stops being shown.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 02:04 AM
2

Well, for example, the "boys will be boys" rhetoric is used to excuse kids, when in reality they should be taught not to act in whatever way they are. Yea, children who naturally have more energy should totally just be forced to sit quietly and talk. That being said, it's more-or-less just the fact that, at least now, men control most of society, and that's seen as problematic. Men have more of the overt positions of power, but they don't control society. Men in power are somewhat beholden to vo…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 02:02 AM
4

The fatherhood bonus and motherhood penalty are because when men become fathers they typically become more dedicated to their work in order to be providers. Women typically become the more active parent and so become less dedicated to their work.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 01:56 AM
4

I mean, I'm not spouting the 70% number most feminists spout, can you provide evidence it's lower than 96%? I was using a number the number many MRA's even cite. Look at any study on the wage gap. They don't control for everything, and so cannot claim to be showing that any of the wage gap is for the same work. They can only show a certain percentage. How is my argument on Ray Rice weak? You can't just say "it was a different league" because it isn't just the league that had a problem with what …
/r/MensRights26/11/14 12:42 AM
7

He really doesn't justify a lot of his points well. You also provide basically no evidence for your points. I am not sure quite what you are looking for here. As for opinions, I agree with your friend in thinking that patriarchy as feminists discuss it generally doesn't exist (sometimes they define it in ways so it obviously exists, but they tend not to use it as if that was the definition). The wage gap is not 96%, we can definitely prove that 96% of the wage gap is due to different work that w…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 12:11 AM
1

It basically just means you have to ask before they let you post and show that you aren't a brand new or alternate account.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 02:26 AM
1

There are studies that have tried to duplicate the results and got the opposite result. That indicates that the result above could just be chance.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 04:28 AM
2

There are a few reasons it is essential to argue against feminism in general. The first one is that feminists always take credit as a group for the good things that other feminists do. The argument "how can you be against feminism, feminism means women having the vote and equality" is an example of an argument that is most effectively argued against by saying "no it doesn't". If the movement takes credit for the positive things it does as a group then it needs to bear responsibility for the nega…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:09 PM
12

The issue is geography in many cases. People here are going to be very spread out, which makes it hard to coordinate boots on the ground efforts.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 01:53 AM
1

I really don't get what you are saying. Is it a problem that people make different choices? Because at the current moment the whole wage gap could well be due to the differences in choices made.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 02:57 PM
1

The study doesn't clam to take all factors into account. They even say the rest of the wage gap could very well be due to non-discrimination factors they haven't accounted for.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 04:25 PM
0

So it yourself point out that she didn't cover every female issue, but her not covering every male issue make it negligible. If I talked about women's issues, said they were a big deal and then my example was sometimes women get called bossy the net effect would be to make people think that women's issues weren't a big deal if they were unaware of them before because my example is so trivial.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 04:20 PM
3

There are few academics who actually are honest about the wage gap because most universities are so hyper politically correct and feminist. However, it is simply to look at the studies that do attempt to show a wage gap and see how they are flawed. Most of these studies attempt to control for some things these days. But there are always differences not accounted for, for example hours commute, danger of the work, job security, benefits, and willingness to relocate are almost never accounted for …
/r/MensRights30/09/14 08:24 PM
-4

As are men.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 07:47 PM
1

That's partially because there is a lot of disagreement between feminist subreddits though.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 10:58 PM
1

If you want to take free birth control away, be prepared to make the same argument for free condoms. Is she actually saying that? I don't her advocating removing free birth control anywhere in her comment. Guys should be just as responsible for their "bad decisions" as girls, after all. Women are the ones who have better knowledge of the risks and better ability to manage them so they bear more of the responsibility when there is a failure to manage those risks.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 08:07 AM
1

You don't need to be angry to call someone who is being a stupid bitch a stupid bitch. Bad behaviour deserves to be called out.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:55 AM
27

I don't think anyone here is trying to make you into a victim if you don't want to be. Or if they are they shouldn't be.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:31 PM
1

I actually think it is the illuminati.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 05:42 PM
3

It doesn't matter if you are nice or not so you might as well be aggressive in calling out bigotry.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 04:58 PM
1

No, they don't know what rape really is because they see so many people "raping" each other and enjoying it and being happy after.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 01:39 AM
2

Feminism in India is more about protecting women. Do you have any evidence for your claims? It seems to me that you are just taking a society that you don't know anything about and assuming that the same lies that have been debunked here are true there. It strikes me that the totality of your evidence is probably a few sensationalized cases, out of a country of a billion.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 12:47 AM
1

that often don't think they did anything wrong. This couldn't possibly be because feminists imply that all drunk sex is rape, so people no longer think rape is a big deal could it?
/r/MensRights09/08/14 11:25 PM
3

Perhaps the person she slept with was equally drunk.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 11:24 PM
7

Or perhaps we could try to deal with the issues both genders face without unfairly demonizing one gender.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 11:20 PM
12

It's mostly just a way to shame male sexuality.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:17 PM
1

I don't think most people here think that fathers shouldn't have to pay child support. There is a belief here called LPS, which means that men should be able to opt out of parental responsibilities and rights until the child is born. People here also object to the fact that child support is enforced and visitation isn't, and to the fact that most of the time custody of the children is given to the woman.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:48 PM
2

I have learned things in my life other than from the study, and it is that I was basing my comment on. I apologize if that was confusing to you. Also, I am not that pissed off. That appears to be you, and I would encourage you to take your own advice.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:59 PM
3

Also, can we all agree that biological patterns of attraction are not a rights issue please? The issue is that people are not honest about being attracted to men who aren't nice, so you have things like unattractive and nice people being called assholes. It would be similar to if men assumed attractive women were just more moral and smarter than unattractive ones. People need to be honest about what they are attracted to and not rationalize their attraction as based on someone's moral qualities …
/r/MensRights28/07/14 04:57 PM
2

Was this "always" actually "contingent upon" her virginity status? Her beauty? Her willingness to stay subservient to the household authority figure (a man)? No. On the titanic there were no requirements for the women in the women and children first policy. Is power really power when it is only given to you by the discretion of the person who has the real power 100% of the time? You are missing my point here. It isn't determined which party has the power if they always want the same thing. What …
/r/MensRights23/07/14 03:05 PM
0

The concept of power only really has meaning if two groups are in conflict. For example, if a king has nominal power but always listens to his wife because he wants to do please her that much then from a practical perspective they both have power. Men have always wanted to protect, please, and prove their worth to women, so while men did have nominal power throughout history (largely as a result of women's work in the home not being as conducive to holding offices of power) I don't think it make…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 06:00 PM
1

I don't think you really know what you are talking about here.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 04:50 PM
1

Yes. Ironically I support the MRM because I think feminism is terrible for women. It gives them what they think they want which ends up being incredibly bad for them.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 05:39 AM
3

It's certainly possible to invent new legitimate sports that would naturally favor women, and work against the usual male athletic advantages, by depending more on flexibility and patience, and less on strength or haste (pick your own characteristics if these don't satisfy). I don't think that would necessarily be possible because in my opinion one of the biggest male traits that means they are more often at the top is competitiveness.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 03:16 AM
2

I'm not going to defend a statement like, "some women are begging to be raped", but there is a grain of truth to it. There is more than a grain of truth to it if you use feminists definitions of rape.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter