TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LCGiftingWisdom Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by LCGiftingWisdom on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

At a baby shower…it’s def not just the internet
/r/MensRights05/10/24 10:50 PM
3

We are all grown, just speaking metaphorically. Still sucks in the man’s side but who you “saving”? The kid that fell of their bike or the guy that just feel down some stairs? Hopefully both but you get my point.
/r/MensRights03/10/24 05:22 AM
3

It’s basically this. They are favored because they are on average physically vulnerable. Men are not favored because they are on average not physically vulnerable. They basically carry the same value as a child. We can science this all day but the basics is they are the “children” “we” need to protect, hence the global patience with sometimes more life threatening behavior (hitting people with bowling balls, stabbing, bagging heads to concrete, etc.). It’s when the context of sex gets thrown in …
/r/MensRights03/10/24 02:00 AM
1

You know what’s funny, I just got back from the feminism board and both sides says literally the same shit about each with cases and the whole nine. Starting to believe we might just be missing models to model after at this point.
/r/MensRights03/10/24 01:53 AM
2

Stats because my feelings don’t matter
/r/MensRights03/10/24 01:51 AM
2

To my understanding, it was usually by choice. The narrative is typically they were held back by their husbands, but I can’t find any unbiased papers or stories from people privately that really say that was the paradigm outside of media.
/r/MensRights03/10/24 12:09 AM
2

It was and then something happened. I’m currently investigating what the cause is but so far, it got something to do with motherhood messaging, sexual liberation without recourse, and a hijacking by another community (LGBTQ+) making it not about women anymore, but men which makes it human rights and not women’s rights, so there’s no foundation to lean on in the cause currently that I’m seeing. If a woman actually cannot be defined, that’s the red flag clearly.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 02:55 PM
2

No discrimination is justifiable, misogyny or misandry.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 05:54 AM
1

Block all the stimulants (social media, over sexualized images you are exposed to, contact, etc.) and just in general stay off the internet side of women.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 02:24 AM
1

This is gonna sound dark but there is a sexual predisposition women have to “assholes” or “dark traits”. They “sexually” don’t approve, I can go on but that’s basically it in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 02:23 AM
0

Ok
/r/MensRights01/10/24 02:21 AM
1

Women are different, not better. They are just as disgusting and evil, it just expresses differently. Lookup “dominance heirarchy in mate selection”. There’s a lot to explaining women’s evil, and men, all of which is mostly insecurity based.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 02:21 AM
1

Anything from 2024 by chance?
/r/MensRights01/10/24 02:16 AM
1

And you are awkwardly and for whatever the heck reason getting caught in the crossfire.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 02:15 AM
1

First, did you (I have to ask, it’s the internet bro)? Second, stand your ground on the subject. That’s a crazy thought and to me speaks to more of a weird thought she’s having or something she’s going through. Maybe she’s using social media too much (the general narrative might be getting to her perception of men universally).
/r/MensRights01/10/24 02:14 AM
1

Rape, physical abuse, sexual harassment, verbal abuse, and a whole host of policy breaking like lying on government forms (not common), lying to police, kinda just lying in general. My theory is because men can beat them or something of the sort is the paradigm so to most it balances out which is weird…and no, I’m not advocating for beating women if that’s where your head went.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 02:10 AM
1

We can just start a social media app. I’m sure some devs are in here. My only concern is the radical weirdos trolling and lying about the women of topic. As long as that’s covered, I don’t think anything would happen. Also, the world is slowing equalizing between the genders. Facebook groups would be fine but keep in mind they are based in SF. Discord would probably be better, just once again the trolls and weirdos have to be modded and rooted constantly.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 02:07 AM
1

Sort of. Behaviors can play a role as well. Also aggression and sexualization in the workplace as a distraction. Performance is typically why though. Not that woman couldn’t, it’s that they weren’t at the time. Me as a business owner would hire a woman for whatever she is qualified for and pay her the same if she did the same and more if she did better. Speaking for myself, it’s not gender based but performance, workplace impact, reliability, distraction, liability, and efficiency based. If none…
/r/MensRights01/10/24 02:02 AM
1

Economic morality.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 01:56 AM
3

I know…don’t rub it in man
/r/MensRights01/10/24 01:55 AM
1

This is crazy wrong. In psychology and psychotherapy, most all cases of wrong doing has a traumatic experience attached to it, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 01:42 AM
1

I’ll be completely real, I feel relieved…I’m also in the feminists sub just trying to kinda mediate between the two and so far it seems ok. I just got here but to be fair, I am coming from Twitter…holy shit that place is a Diddy party on steroids.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 01:40 AM
1

“To get the man, you get the woman” - Serpant “Filter who you fuck with” “Bullshit is shit from a bull” “Gotta take a step to walk a mile” “One more for mommy” - Arnold Schwarzenegger
/r/MensRights01/10/24 01:37 AM
1

Without even reading, it’s because she can “do what she wants without recourse consequence”. It’s like being a keyboard warrior but in real life and most people want that. She is a good spirit but a terrible example of a person behaviorally speaking.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 01:31 AM
1

It’s because she can “do what she wants without recourse”. You should look into research papers about “dominance hierarchy in women” and then check domestic”gender distribution of global spending”. This is why she’s still on top.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 01:30 AM
1

Kid you not, I had to explain women violence rates being higher to ChatGPT when I was developing a theory. Gender bias is built in. It does think men are violent without reason and women have defense based reasons. Search domestic violence cases by sexuality and then check gender distribution of domestic abuse intake.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 01:28 AM
1

Depending on the cause of the breakup, could be a civil lawsuit in the states.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 01:24 AM
2

Maybe, but to do that, I wouldn’t use the label “feminist” as this might hurt cause a divide which is the inherent issue. Anti-gender discrimination or even anti-societal might be a better label given the societal impact modern practices have had on everyone in society as of late (OF, Twitter porn, daughters going crazy, male suicides up, etc).
/r/MensRights01/10/24 01:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter