TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LD_in_MT Archive

View 1 posts and 49 comments by LD_in_MT on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

LD_in_MT/r/askTRP22/10/14 03:27 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Check out this pic of two 13 year old boys. https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/5zwds1/my_brother_and_his_friend_both_age_13_we_loved/ It shows just how hard it is to guess someone's age.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 08:15 PM
6

"Citation, please."
/r/MensRights10/03/17 07:22 PM
16

The point is that even if you grant the premise, all men do not benefit equally. What would make sense be internally consistent would be to charge people different amounts based on what they actually make, without regard for gender. Note that this doesn't work in the real world because no one, under normal circumstances, would pay 10x the price for a muffin just because they make 10x the median income.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:27 PM
43

What's absurd about their tactic is that is assumes ALL men automatically make x% more and can, therefore, pay x% more. Any sort of (theoretical) gender pay gap would not apply evenly.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 02:56 PM
4

Right now, in my state (Montana) there is pending legislation that will eliminate the force requirement under the rape statute. This would mean taking away the requirement of there being any physical evidence that would differ from consensual sex and turn it into a he said/she said situation. While I do believe that there can be rape without bruising (for instance), I do not believe that the legislature can draft a good statue without a requirement for physical evidence -- which would make false…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 10:00 PM
19

This is why allegations uncorroborated by witnesses or physical evidence are insufficient evidence in rape cases.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 09:26 PM
13

That's crazy. People open doors for each other all the time.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 03:35 PM
1

It's sad. I just think that there has to be a way to "win."
/r/MensRights20/02/17 09:51 PM
1

On internet forums, things can go south quickly and it can turn into a witch hunt and it's nearly impossible to defend yourself. In public, people make a lot of assumptions based on looks and situation. You just need to own the narrative and not let people fill in the blanks. It's wrong that you have to do anything, but I wonder what motive cues you could use to look less threatening? Maybe bring a dog as a subject? Maybe a sign: Pro Beach Photos $50 for 10. Maybe a higher price would communicat…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 06:18 PM
2

"Male privilege" requires us to go out and do the dirty work. But seriously, I wonder what the statistics look like if you exclude gang/drug-related homicide?
/r/MensRights16/02/17 09:34 PM
1

It would be a crime to do so, which is more protection than potential fathers currently enjoy. If the woman is married, that would presumably be her husband. If single, it's stickier. I've never seen a good discussion of the issue of men's rights with unborn children, but it seems wrong for it to be 100% the woman's choice when the father will bear ~50% financial responsibility. I would support 100% paternity testing for child support/welfare liability.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:14 PM
4

They should have worded the scholarship to say some about the less enrolled gender instead of specifically saying "male". And while I'm bitching, the title should have said "...new scholarship program which prioritises male applicants gender equality.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 08:41 PM
62

Sarcasm on Men's Rights issues is difficult because no matter how over-the-top you make something, you can usually find something saying the same thing seriously.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:59 PM
2

http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=8738
/r/MensRights07/02/17 06:09 PM
1

"Feminism" means different things to different audiences. To some it just means equality under the law. To others, it means a women's-needs-first, female-dominated culture because men (the Patriarchy) have been the source of all evil.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 04:59 PM
5

Direct link to video to get around ad-block blocking: https://embed.tune.pk/embed?videoid=3876639
/r/MensRights24/01/17 06:00 PM
22

I think we need to consider how the response and receptions of the film would have been different had it been the work of a male. It seems that in mainstream culture, only women are free to question feminism and misandry.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 03:18 PM
1

I see what you mean about kind of getting into an argument about gaming characters and seeing how they deal with it. I think that's fair game in an interview but some people would get their feelings hurt. I can't believe she would have her mother call. I'm embarrassed for her.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:29 PM
1

Agreed in general about the sense of entitlement of millennials and some women, but she should be interviewing you as well to make sure this is the right fit for her. I've been in the position of having to choose between a few different potential employers and it's important to ask questions and make sure the job is a good fit.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:11 PM
1

Perhaps I should have said that the statute is problematic. Right now, we have one crime called "rape" that encompasses what used to be called rape1 when I was young (stranger in van abducts, rapes and kills woman) and is being applied to what was called "date rape2" in the 80's and 90's and millennial "regret rape3" that was by most definitions consensual at the time. The punishment is as one would expect for rape1 -- near that of murder. It's problematic to draft a statute that falls between r…
/r/MensRights29/12/16 09:33 PM
34

That's the problem. No one expects that this kind of law will be applied equally and it's usually one person's word against anther's. Men and women both do shitty things in relationships, but they tend to be different things. The things that men do tend to be criminalized, the things women do? You go girl!!!
/r/MensRights29/12/16 09:10 PM
5

It's completely one-sided legislation. This is just a draft bill by a democrat in a republican-controlled senate (and house) and I think it has little chance of passing. It's part of a push to redefine "consent" to require affirmative consent. The Montana rape statues currently require use of force as an element. This definition is problematic but it's very difficult to craft legislation that isn't overly vague or cast too wide a net (as demonstrated above). The thing about requiring physical fo…
/r/MensRights29/12/16 05:57 PM
22

Exactly that I was thinking. It's telling when you turn the gender tables and the outcome is absurd. It's terrible legislation. Impossibly vague; probably constitutionaly so. If a girl says "I'm a virgin" and it's not true, that's somehow rape by deception? IIRC, an earlier draft included a definition of "intoxicating substance" to include any substance that can cause impairment or death, which would make water a date-rape drug. Beyond crazy.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 05:35 PM
26

Rape by deception is on the books in some places but it usually means impersonating a wife's husband. There has been a push lately to expand the definition to just about any false or misleading statements. The draft bill I saw was so vaguely worded that any misleading statement could qualify. (18) "Deception" means knowingly to: (a) create or confirm in another an impression that is false and that the offender does not believe to be true; (b) fail to correct a false impression that the offender …
/r/MensRights29/12/16 04:58 PM
212

They've been talking about "rape by deception". Is there a tort for "marriage by deception"?
/r/MensRights29/12/16 02:54 PM
5

That's why many (US) states require force as an element of the offense -- because a forceful rape leaves physical evidence and differs from consensual sex. Otherwise it is a he said/she said. Not perfect, but the best balance we've found.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 10:31 PM
1

Because simplistic thinking and confirmation bias are easier than actually delving into the differences.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 04:17 PM
2

You left out that that his books are usually cataloged under Young Adult fiction.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 04:57 PM
8

In my town, we had sightings of two bears and a mountain lion in the last week. The hell a modern man has no use for a gun. NYT is completely living in a NYC fishbowl on some issues.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 05:39 PM
1

"Actually, it's a benefit. It makes it easy to find out who's shallow in the group because anyone who would criticize someone for things they can't change, like being black, female, gay, etc, just gave themselves away as not being worth of serious consideration."
/r/askTRP18/09/15 10:05 PM
1

782 If your level is at 782, you don't need to increase your testosterone. Your problems lie elsewhere.
/r/askTRP14/07/15 10:48 PM
1

Hope reigns eternal.
/r/askTRP22/05/15 05:26 PM
3

TominatorXX, basically you won, on an intellectual level.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 11:35 PM
1

The programs and perks seem to change every time I look. Talk to the recruiters for all branches before you make a multi-year commitment. Consider National Guard/Reserves while going to school, as well as ROTC.
/r/askTRP01/05/15 07:52 PM
1

Ask her straight up what's in it for you. Suggest that she cook you dinner. If you are interested in any of her friends, suggest that she invite them over as well.
/r/askTRP29/04/15 10:39 PM
3

A lot of cool websites we're created by people in their 20's who were full of idealism. After a decade, many have decided it's time to move on/cash in. Corporations take over and all corporations can agree about is profit. You can say whatever you want so long as it doesn't threaten profitability.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 03:18 PM
1

Don't trust the B____ in apt 23. Available on Netflix. I couldn't have watched it before TRP, now it's hilarious.
/r/askTRP24/12/14 09:15 PM
1

I've a question on the whole 10 rating scheme that I've never heard addressed. Do looks follow a normal distribution (bell curve) or is it straight line? To clarify, a straight line means there at ten 10's, ten 1's and ten of everything in between. Normal distribution, is more like one or two 1's and 10's and 60% are in 4,5,6 land. You also, of course, have to account for age. The only place you can get a good sampling is like a high school year book. But I'd call most girls, 6's or 7's with ver…
/r/askTRP30/10/14 10:43 PM
1

"Oh, you're too good for cake now?" One of my SO's friends said that when I declined some carbs/bread. I told her, "My body, my choice". Shut her right down.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/14 08:07 PM
1

I'm getting good at telling if girls are interested. Body language, eye contact, etc. My main problem is sealing the deal. I think it helps if they have to take some initiative to get in touch.
/r/askTRP22/10/14 04:56 PM
1

you get 15 potentially bored women ringing you up randomly at the last moment to hang out. I don't see this as being too much of a problem. Just pick one and tell the rest, "Sorry, you should have called sooner. I have plans now," signaling unavailability. And now I have their number :-;
/r/askTRP22/10/14 04:35 PM
1

That's hilarious. There doing it "to be different" but they are really just conforming to the new normal.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/14 02:56 PM
1

I agree in general, but there's obviously a huge difference between a Hello Kitty tat below the panty line and a large visible piece.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/14 02:54 PM
2

It's just basic economics. Women want prostitution illegal to increase their own market value by increasing scarcity. It has much more to do with self-interest than morals. Though, wives worrying about STD's is a potential concern.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 10:30 PM
2

Brad Pitt is also extremely wealthy. He is (was?) married to a hot actress, which ups his value.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 09:05 PM
1

If she was in control enough to ask about a condom, she knew what she was doing. This is regret rape.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 08:47 PM
1

What would happen if "John" had filed the complaint against "Jane"? Is it too late for him to do so now?
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 08:39 PM
2

This worked well for me: I asked a girl to a movie and it wasn't clear if we were "just friends" or if this was a date. We get up to the ticket window. She asks if I'm going to pay. I say, "Yes, if this is a date, no if were just friends". I paid and we ended up going back to my place....
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 10:26 PM
2

Threesomes are are to come by. Hit that. My main concern is making sure those girls don't poison the well on you afterwords.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 10:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter