TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LDinthehouse Archive

View 1 posts and 43 comments by LDinthehouse on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
36

LDinthehouse/r/MensRights17/03/17 02:27 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That’s really shitty that you’ve had those experiences, I genuinely feel for you bro. On the flip side, I’ve never had anything like that happen to me and there’s no studies to back yours up so we can’t generalize that all women are like that. This woman accidentally ran over and killed her husband after she was tailing a woman who was driving her car and went to prison for it. I just think this sub is sometimes too quick to point all the blame on the woman because it fits with what they want to…
/r/MensRights19/10/18 04:36 PM
0

This wasn't from the same article but another article on the same website. ​ It actually really does, that's why she didn't get a long sentence and that's why vehicular manslaughter is a thing. The son actually celebrated the lenient sentence and yet the comment section here is acting like he hates his mother.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 04:19 PM
-29

No she will not. If anyone of you had bothered to do the slightest bit of research before blindly getting worked up you would have realized it was an accident. I am a MRA but you guys are making us look like the extreme feminists that have taken their cause and twisted it to fit what they want. Contreras had testified that her affair with Bill Hall, 50, had lasted three years. Frances Hall, during the punishment phase of the trial, testified she was unaware of the relationship until Contreras ph…
/r/MensRights16/10/18 12:35 PM
14

Ah I forgot care taking roles are crucial to our society whereas everything else is completely expendable.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 02:51 PM
1

Sounds like they do want it if the audience was predominantly young women.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 12:02 AM
1

Would it not make sense to encourage more women into physics based education and employment? This guy actually presented “physics invented and built by men, it’s not by invitation". How dense do you have to be to think women weren’t at the forefront of physics research simply because they didn’t want to or didn’t try hard enough.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 03:42 PM
-3

Fair play I probably deserve the downvotes for saying no one is because that’s not correct. However I still maintain that the comment above was very sensationalist and it certainly isn’t the “entire police”. The Wikipedia articles you linked certainly show a cover up in Oxford and Rotherham and extreme failings in Telford and Rochdale but the others (Halifax, Newcastle, Bristol, Banbury, Derby and Peterborough) that you linked are just cases of child sex trafficking/rings that were shut down and…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 11:43 AM
-10

Edit: please read the below comments for more clarification. Lol get out here with your sensational bullshit. For those that are interested it’s a much more complex situation than /u/theemulators gives the impression of. I would advise that you read up on it a little before making any conclusions. It’s also worth noting that our police here in the UK are held to very high standards and we investigate reports of wrongdoing independently regularly and thoroughly. Our police force are stretched ver…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 10:11 AM
5

56 likes but 1246 comments? Yeah it's not socially acceptable
/r/MensRights14/08/18 10:11 AM
1

'Petite Jordan' .....wow
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:18 AM
1

if it's good for the gander, it's good for the goose Doesn’t really apply to this situation as we’re fighting for different objectives. The same tactic is only going to serve to demonize women which isn’t a good outcome for anyone. I do want you to rise above it, that’s the way you are going to get results rather than furthering an image of this subreddit and any group of men trying to show the inequality as one of insecure and petty. Not saying you are but that’s what it will look like to an ou…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 06:20 PM
1

So you're saying that grouping them all together and assuming the loudest speaker is speaking for all of them is a helpful solution? What exactly is your goal? What do you want society to do? If you want truly equal rights then you have to see everyone's point of view and engage in fair debate, not start levelling stupid accusations at 'all women'
/r/MensRights27/03/18 04:55 PM
13

It wasn’t me who said that but I see your point anyway. Not really in the spirit of debate tho if we count one voice in a crowd as speaking for the group whether or not the rest of the group agree. Using that logic you could say “they [men] are rapists, billionaires, murderers and gay.” Just because there is at least one of those doesn’t mean that they represent the group. All women shouldn’t be held accountable for the writing of a few.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 11:17 PM
5

Good man
/r/MensRights26/03/18 11:04 PM
0

In what way are men the only ones that are made to take responsibility? Not every woman that carries a child to term desperately wants a baby but abortion isn’t an option for all, surely you understand that?
/r/MensRights26/03/18 11:03 PM
51

Do you trust every woman that says the same? I don’t.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 10:59 PM
10

But this doesn’t necessarily represent the majority. I know plenty of women that would prefer male over female contraception and plenty who would prefer both.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 10:58 PM
13

Not op but I think it’s unfortunate that the way it worked out, women alone have to carry the baby to term because it clearly creates an imbalance that not easily fixed. I don’t think men should have a 50% say over whether the child is brought to term or not and I do think that we should be held partly responsible if it is and therefore help to pay for its upbringing. The system clearly doesn’t 100% work the way it is because some women are left without enough to properly support their families …
/r/MensRights26/03/18 10:52 PM
1

Wow
/r/MensRights25/01/18 07:31 PM
-5

Very similar to feminism.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 05:34 PM
352

Why on earth couldn't she have a section for girls only on top of what the boys have? To create equality she's attempting to bring the boys down to the level of the girls rather that bringing the girls up to the level of the boys. Man if I were a parent at this school I would be going absolutely nuts. She's knowingly defrauded a school foundation out of a grant by lying through her teeth about what the grant was going to be used for. This sick fuck is making me furious. She places blame at toy m…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 01:12 PM
0

How will the husband know unless they report it ? Perhaps this is true, we aren't aware of whether or not he knew she left of her own accord but it doesn't make the ruling incorrect. What if she and her lover conspired this as a loophole to extract money from husband ? Because such things happened already in India. And what if a space cow told them to do this in order to feed our lizard monarchy? You're wildly speculating. Get the fuck out of /r/mensrights with your bullshit alternative facts an…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:24 AM
1

Depends on whether she and her lover reported this as facts to husband No, it doesn't. It is the incorrect charge, she was never illegally imprisoned so the court can't return a guilty verdict. It just wouldn't make sense. What if she and her lover abused this loophole ? What loophole? Are you insinuating that she should be forced into a marriage she doesn't want?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:00 AM
5

Okay so a number of things wrong with this post. Point 1: The reason why the court have made this so called "bizarre statement" is because the husband petitioned the court for habeas corpus which is incorrect. Habeas corpus is "a recourse in law whereby a person can report an unlawful detention or imprisonment before a court" Since she clearly hasn't been illegally imprisoned, the court is correct. Point 2: Both Advocates (Barristers in UK courts, not sure about US) recommended he file for divor…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:34 AM
29

Can you prove any of more that with a source please?
/r/MensRights26/03/17 01:00 PM
516

There's no mention of her trying to steal half her stuff. OP has assumed the male had more which is in itself a sexist view. Also, isn't this the same woman that tried to divorce her husband before and he wouldn't let her even though they have been separated for over a year? If so, no wonder she cheated on him. She's looking for a way out of a marriage that she's not happy in. We definitely need the man's side of the story before we can judge but at this stage I see no men's rights to be fought …
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:57 AM
1

There's no mention of her trying to steal half her stuff. OP has assumed the male had more which is in itself a sexist view. Also, isn't this the same woman that tried to divorce her husband before and he wouldn't let her even though they have been separated for over a year? If so, no wonder she cheated on him. She's looking for a way out of a marriage that she's not happy in. We definitely need the man's side of the story before we can judge but at this stage I see no men's rights to be fought …
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:57 AM
1

Says you!
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:21 AM
78

The article clearly points out all the male victims but you know... its gang related. No need for a source on that. It's gang related. Believe me. But tbh I'm don't think we should be crying wolf on this one. It seems to me pretty clear that they are targeting Muslims (once again without a source).
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:25 PM
1

Not everyone lives in America bud.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:05 PM
4

too true
/r/MensRights17/03/17 02:51 PM
7

This looks more like a magazine than a school book. What a load of shite!
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:18 PM
22

Wow. If you're spending ~40c a day on toilet paper you're doing something wrong. I won't even go into the birth control + condom = emergency contraception needed bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 04:46 PM
12

This is really strange. I would consider myself a men's rights supporter but have no interest in degrading women. Since when did the two become one and the same?
/r/MensRights08/03/17 12:12 AM
4

What?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 10:24 PM
2

Yes I think you're right. I'm rather confused where the line is drawn for that though. Obviously they couldn't convict a 50 year old teacher for having sex with one of his 40 year old students?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 10:23 PM
31

I have a feeling 16yr old you couldn't punish shit.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:38 PM
11

How honest of you. Well done sir.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:37 PM
37

That is the real story. Her quotes make it sound as though she got caught up in an innocent mistake but this is textbook predatory behaviour and should have warranted a bigger sentance. That said, I'm from the U.K. And 16 is the age of consent here so...
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:37 PM
17

Dozens took to Twitter Literally dozens
/r/MensRights07/03/17 11:31 AM
2

She hitchiked through Iran? That's surely mad? Just let it set in... Hitchinking... through Iran. On the whole thing though she's clearly deceiving men that think something might happen. I'm not saying it's wrong, people who think you can pay for love/sex probably should be taken advantage of but I think she is playing with fire on this one.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 01:41 PM
2

There are definitely sports that allow women to compete with men https://www.google.co.uk/amp/ftw.usatoday.com/2014/02/jen-welter-becomes-first-woman-to-play-in-mens-pro-football-league-at-non-kicking-position/amp
/r/MensRights26/02/17 02:29 PM
1

I think it depends on the individual sports. There are definitely sports that allow women to compete with men if they can but generally they can't match the top levels.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 02:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter