TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LFMagee Archive

View 3 posts and 72 comments by LFMagee on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Tell her the truth: if women want to close the earnings gap, they can (a) work longer hours, and therefore earn more money or (b) reject hypergamy and date people who earn less than they do. Problem solved!
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:10 AM
6

Brilliant, compassionate woman. Can we clone her? ;)
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:07 AM
11

If the more "powerful" party is the one who works more, we're going to have to rethink slavery. Feminism is quite absurd if you stop and think about it.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:05 AM
6

Is it on Netflix streaming yet?
/r/MensRights08/03/17 04:31 AM
3

Agreed. Women are going to have to make a choice. You can have female privilege plus patriarchy or you can have equality -- meaning men's rights.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 08:08 PM
8

Right. That's what I just wrote. There is a broader trend however of claiming that any boy, even if he's 11 or 12, is "lucky" if a woman molests him. There was even a case where a woman molested three 8 and 9 year old boys in a trailer park and was only given probation. Since no one apparently cares about boys, perhaps if people knew that woman-on-boy child abuses causes the rape of women we will reconsider our flippant attitudes.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 08:07 PM
3

That's true. But there were very few of them among the suffragettes. They were part of the "progressive" movement, which sought to reform rather than replace the capitalist system. In the US they focussed on things like child labor, anti-alcohol campaigns, eugenics, "civilizing" Native Americans, etc. They were openly racist, unlike the socialists and anarchists from the time period. In Britain the suffragettes were also highly classicist, arguing that only propertied men and women should have t…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:52 PM
3

Jordan Peterson has talked eloquently about this. He notes that language is supposed to evolve organically. What feminists are doing is trying to force people to use different words. It's an extreme form of totalitarianism that will only make people resent the groups they are supposedly trying to protect.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:42 PM
22

It's definitely a positive review, surprisingly enough. However the author can't help but insert identity politic bullshit throughout: I would guess that the vast majority of the over 100 million murders committed during the 20th century (including all wars) were at the hands of men, most probably white men. Not to mention the raping, pillaging and countless heinous acts that have been the result of men’s behavior. "Men's behavior" is here presented in a vacuum. It doesn't distinguish eg between…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:27 PM
5

'emotional labor.' What does that mean? Nagging your husband? Seems like most of the labor is once again on his end.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:03 PM
1

Fuck. I knew this was too good to be true. The feminists probably chickened out. They'll selectively edit your footage and ask Janet a bunch of questions about Donald Trump.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 06:57 PM
16

You're right in a sense. Boys actually mature more slowly than girls.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:51 PM
3

Finally, there is an alarmingly high rate of sexual abuse by females in the backgrounds of rapists, sex offenders and sexually aggressive men - 59% (Petrovich and Templer, 1984), 66% (Groth, 1979) and 80% (Briere and Smiljanich, 1993). A strong case for the need to identify female perpetrators can be found in Table 4, which presents the findings from a study of adolescent sex offenders by O'Brien (1989). Male adolescent sex offenders abused by "females only" chose female victims almost exclusive…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:43 PM
6

Finally, there is an alarmingly high rate of sexual abuse by females in the backgrounds of rapists, sex offenders and sexually aggressive men - 59% (Petrovich and Templer, 1984), 66% (Groth, 1979) and 80% (Briere and Smiljanich, 1993). A strong case for the need to identify female perpetrators can be found in Table 4, which presents the findings from a study of adolescent sex offenders by O'Brien (1989). Male adolescent sex offenders abused by "females only" chose female victims almost exclusive…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:42 PM
1

Already linked below.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:23 PM
28

I think one study had it at 65%, another at 70% and another at 80%, 59%, 66%, 80% so a good estimate would be three-quarters. The studies are referenced here: http://canadiancrc.com/The_Invisible_Boy_Report.aspx Evidently feminists were wrong about the causes of rape just like they've been wrong about practically everything else.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 04:28 PM
12

A growing number of women are starting to realize that feminism, in addition to harming men and boys, is also harming women themselves.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 04:15 PM
5

"There are no coincidences." - Frasier Crane
/r/MensRights07/03/17 04:06 PM
3

What are the actual percentages though? So far as I'm aware the number of Muslims living in Western nations is relatively small. Is there reason to believe there is going to be a huge uptick in the numbers? I also think the right bears some responsibility for this. They have supported unnecessary interventionist wars and insurgencies in Muslim nations, which have caused massive dislocation. The other issue is that the "left" -- or what passes for it -- is being financed by the capitalist class, …
/r/MensRights07/03/17 03:31 PM
9

Unbridled narcissism.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:59 PM
2

https://archive.org/details/b20442580
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:54 PM
13

A new campaign is urging boys to open up about their emotions Epic fail. We've already been doing this since the 70's and things have gotten progressively worse. What is needed, at minimum, is an end to the privileging of girls in school, the celebration rather than demonization of masculinity and men's contributions to society, more male teachers, and an end to feminist custody laws that drive fathers out of their children's lives. This program will only help the very small number of highly eff…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:47 PM
3

Just like every other group at any point in time. Perhaps. But one could argue that feminism is a particularly toxic and dangerous movement because it is completely irrational and relies entirely on lizard brain biological instincts (keep the womynz safe at all costs! We will go extinct otherwise!). It has become a runaway train at this point, with feminists now wielding the power of the state aka the most violent institution in history. Things are going to get very interesting in the next decad…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:43 PM
51

Studies show that the majority of male rapists (80 percent in one study) were sexually abused by women as children. So we would be wise to treat this issue with the seriousness it deserves. I don't have a problem with sixteen year olds dating adults, but in this case it was a teacher and he had learning disabilities. She also clearly abused her position of power over him.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:38 PM
17

Will this idiocy never end? Should we give them little gold stars while we're at it?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:34 PM
3

Anticapitalism was already a feature of first-wave feminism. Actually the suffragettes were mostly rich women. The first major critique of feminism was written by a socialist (Ernest Belford Bax). It was during the second wave that feminism sank its fangs into the left, and has basically destroyed it as a result. Class analysis has been replaced by "patriarchy" analysis. I agree with your comments about the state, incidentally.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:32 PM
13

Great comment, sums it up nicely. The constant feminist complaints about "sexual harassment" (which may be real or may simply be unwanted attention by an "unworthy" male); "female objectification" (attractive women showing off, which causes resentment in less attractive women); cat-calling (lower class males making sexual comments to women); and even the "male gaze" (reminds me of royalty demanding that peasants not look them in the eye) suggest that we've been through all of this before. Indeed…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:00 PM
1

Women are more likely to use proxy violence, ie "Let's you and him fight." Using the state via a false accusation also qualifies as extreme violence. The reason women are perceived as "less violent" is because (a) we ignore proxy violence (b) women are often not even charged when they commit overt acts of violence, so they don't show up in the stats (c) women will usually (not always) do less physical damage when they commit physical violence (d) emotional "violence" is typically not recognized …
/r/MensRights07/03/17 01:37 PM
2

And I'll probably eventually write a book. That would be tremendous. I also think you would make a great subject for a one on one biopic. Could be called "The Anti-Feminist" or something and explore your ideas in depth. If such a film hasn't been made a year from now I'll do it myself and release it online for free, though will have to use a pseudonym otherwise I'll be blacklisted from the industry.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 01:22 PM
6

It's pants on head retarded. The word "female" is used when referring to both girls and women. You don't see men complaining when people use the word "male." Feminists are just bullying people because they can. These sorts of campaigns only highlight the feminist movement's utter toxicity. While they whine endlessly a la "The Princess and the Pea" men are lacking basic human rights like the ability to see one's children.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 01:14 PM
2

I'll take your word for it. You should realize that there are people on all sides of the political spectrum that support you, and are eagerly awaiting a book (which apparently you have no intention to write :( Good luck with the feminist sharks on Teevee. You should know, and probably do already that you'll be the one regarded as a "progressive" in terms of equal rights. The term "progressive" has become ridiculous; it SHOULD mean "we can do better", and that's about it. Good luck, everyone is r…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 12:26 AM
1

Next time, be sure to let your kids/relatives "win" at chess, even though they would have won anyway. You always lose, yes, but there's no need to make yourself the laughing stock of the neighborhood. Turn your frown upside down :)
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:49 PM
1

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1717/1717-h/1717-h.htm
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:36 PM
3

Thanks and good luck.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:09 PM
0

You caught me. I didn't really think a poster named "muh-soggy-knee" would have something valuable to add to the conversation. I was baiting you to prove your idiocy. Well played by not showing more of your hand ;)
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:04 PM
7

Wow. I really will have to watch this movie now. Thanks. In terms of the religious stuff, it's all about ceremony, not science. If a religious family wants to do the ceremony -- go right ahead. Just do it symbolically. No need to actually mutilate the baby for Christ's sake (sorry ;)
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:03 PM
7

That's great to hear. Jews really need to lead the charge on this. It's not PC to say but Jews wield considerable power. They can use it for ill or good.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:55 PM
3

I just heard that Judgy Bitch intends to defend first wave feminism on CTV. That seems rather counter-productive. One can support the idea of women achieving equal rights while also stressing the minor fact that feminists didn't demand equal obligations. I'm sure you've read these two papers but in case Janet hasn't and you would like to forward: http://www.academia.edu/746242/Favoured_or_oppressed_Married_women_property_and_coverturein_England_1660_1800 https://www.jstor.org/stable/643334?seq=1…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:49 PM
3

Do feminists frequently speak out about female perpetrators of sexual abuse? It's interesting because studies show that up to 80% of male rapists were sexually abused by WOMEN as children. That puts rather a dent in the whole "rape is a tool of the patriarchy" myth. The hypocrisy is also noteworthy. For example the Vagina Monologues was celebrated by feminists even though it involved a "good" rape scene of a woman against a girl. Finally, Dunham is both a sexist and a racist (against white males…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:36 PM
4

I was probably overstating the case. I think enough people will watch it that it will make a difference. Just saying that it's a brutal "procedure" to behold.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:30 PM
0

It's only "reasonable" to you because you hate men and boys.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:28 PM
1

Cheers.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:27 PM
13

No one will watch it is what will happen, unfortunately. There's a reason Cassie Jaye only spent about 30 seconds on the topic, and did so just by showing a brief video clip. When people actually see it they are rightly mortified unless blinded by religious dogma. I HOPE I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:22 PM
1

I wasn't aware he wrote more than one work on the subject, will have to check it out.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:14 PM
22

Dick-shaming? I'm cut, I oppose MGM and I don't feel remotely ashamed. Some women even prefer the aesthetics of a circumcised dick. That doesn't mean we should be mutilating little boys (causing hundreds of deaths per year) for Bronze age religious purposes or to provide women with skin cream. I don't blame my parents either, they were bamboozled by doctors funded by the eugenics movement (circumcision was popularized in the US by Harvey Kellogg as a means of curbing masturbation). There are eve…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:13 PM
1

Wow. Your post belongs at the top.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:09 PM
9

Imagine how evil you would have to be to call someone a "rape apologist" just for arguing in defense of due process rights. Especially considering the history of lynching and knowing that rape (of females, not males) is practically considered worse than murder in our society.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:06 PM
76

Seems like a good fit to me. Privileged, insecure, miseducated, talentless, man-hating, mentally disturbed. Did I mention unattractive? Checks off all the right boxes.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:55 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:34 PM
0

The two aren't remotely comparable. Until recently, a significant majority of the people alive at any given time in civilized history have been women. This has been confirmed by DNA studies. Men were far more likely to die unnatural deaths in wars and workplaces than women giving natural births.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:46 PM
9

You're comparing apples and oranges (or, if you'd like, baby peas and giant pumpkins). Current feminist concerns include the horror of seeing attractive women's bodies, men sitting comfortably on the subway, and "mansplanning" (aka being told facts). Current MRA concerns include things like genital mutilation, being forced to die in wars, having one's kids taken away from you, being twice as likely to be charged with a crime, receiving 63 percent longer prison sentences, being arrested when you …
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:42 PM
3

Your entire argument is hinged on this statement, which is factually incorrect. (a) It is you who are incorrect and (b) even if he had been wrong about the present, men were literally dying by the millions in foreign wars when women were agitating for suffrage. So the point stands regardless.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:13 PM
2

The socialist Ernest Belford Bax wrote a book called "The Fraud of Feminism" (you can read it online) in the early 20th century, in which he discussed things like male obligation. The Catholic GK Chesterton wrote another book exploring similar topics from a traditionalist perspective.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:11 PM
1

I listened to the first few minutes. Something about the "alt-right", so nothing to do with men's rights. If they talk about the MRM you should let us know at what time marker.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:55 PM
9

That's a very good point. There are a surprisingly large number of white Muslims. That's actually what altered Malcolm X's worldview about "white devils" when he visited Mecca.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:21 PM
23

There are three reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. Two of the three are written by sniveling male feminist ideologues and are negative. One of them even references Dave Futrelle! It's going to be interesting to see how other critics respond, because I'm a documentary buff and I can say with 100% certainty that the Red Pill deserves positive reviews. It presents both sides of the story, challenges dominant views, brings light to issues long suppressed, has decent production values, provides a compelling…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:19 PM
27

It's just a dark joke. We could use a little levity around here once and awhile. MRA's are not saintly beings and even if we were, that wouldn't make any difference. Feminists would vilify us regardless. It's not even clear that acting like perfect gentlemen is the correct approach. Warren Farrell is basically a pussycat but he was ignored for several decades. It took Paul Elam a few years of shit posting and a documentary was made about the MRM.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:13 PM
50

Justifiably brutal.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:50 PM
65

lol. I love how some joke on a forum is supposed to discredit people fighting for human rights. Conversely the leading lights of feminism can say things like "we are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men" (Elizabeth Cady Stanton, the founder of the feminist movement in the US) or "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race" (Sally Miller Gearhart, who founded the first "gender studies" program) or "Women are the primary victims of war" (Hillary…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:49 PM
32

This sort of thing is simply another form of bigotry and hate-mongering. If it was socially acceptable to hate on some other group they would be doing so. These are people who can only feel better about themselves by putting others down, ie pathetic individuals.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:31 PM
5

You're acting like a quintessential white night. It's a term to describe a man who throws other men under the bus to protect m'lady even when it's painfully obvious the woman is in the wrong. It usually describes pathetic individuals with low self esteem who place women on a pedestal rather than treating them as equals.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:28 PM
11

feminists of the day shouldn't be held responsible for how it got fucked up. Of course they should. If they had started with an actual commitment to equality then feminism wouldn't have evolved into the shitshow it is today. We would have an egalitarian movement that looks at the problems of both sexes. That's not what they did. They were a supremacist movement from the start, exploiting the male protective instinct to grant women ever more privileges. You can see it right at the beginning with …
/r/MensRights06/03/17 05:44 PM
15

Voting, financial independence, equivalent legal rights...they had every reason to complain. I didn't see them complaining about male obligations, whether it be conscription, having to support their wives under threat of imprisonment, being forced to pay a woman's debts, receiving longer prison sentences, making up 95% of workplace deaths, etc. So yes, they had a right to complain but no, they weren't looking for "equality."
/r/MensRights06/03/17 05:23 PM
10

"The MRA" lmao. I think she means "The MRM." Absolutely shameless. But a fascinating glimpse into journalistic incompetence and deceit. Imagine having so little empathy and integrity that you are willing to lie and vilify a group fighting for human rights. God forbid that baby boys not be mutilated, that fathers be able to spend time with their children, that men receive equal treatment in the criminal justice system etc. Feminists are scum and are increasingly being recognized for the hateful b…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 04:58 PM
7

One of the humorous things I've noticed about this and other feminist faux-outrages involving sexy women is that if it's "artistic" it's less objectionable. Why is that? Presumably because (with some exceptions) the more "artistic" it is the less likely that men will find the images sexually stimulating. We also see this with actresses saying "I'll only get nude if it's essential to the plot." God forbid you turn a man on. Strangely we don't see complaints about sexy powerful men a la "Shades of…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 04:49 PM
6

You say that sarcastically but we're honestly not far off from such a prospect. In Sweden they have a crisis hotline for women who suffer the trauma of "mansplaining." What is "mansplaining" if not the communication of facts that some women find uncomfortable?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:57 PM
3

Why don't feminists just go buy some land and live only with other women if they hate men so much? Since most feminists are middle class or rich they have no shortage of money. Come on ladies -- put your money where your mouth is! Go create your female utopia. I'd even support a kickstarter for the project -- on condition that you film everything so we can enjoy the ensuing shitshow.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:40 PM
2

Still national though right? That's yuuuge. Don't forget to bring ham sandwiches in case there are any male feminists on the panel. In all seriousness, good luck, I'm sure you'll kick ass as per usual.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:23 PM
-8

You're a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 01:23 PM
5

I support this measure. However feminists themselves need to be the ones to actually change the signs, pro bono (obviously tax payers, mostly men, should not be forced to pay for such a vanity project when there are real people in need). So they'll have to learn the necessary skills, get up on the ladders, and start fixin'. Get to work ladies!
/r/MensRights06/03/17 01:18 PM
7

I don't recall any criticism by feminists of the women posing for page 3, especially since many of them are as you describe, limited in their sources of income. This is true. Feminists portray women who exploit male desire in order to make money as "victims of the patriarchy". This is sort of like portraying drug dealers as victims of the drug consumer. It is based on the myth than women lack agency and are just damsels in distress. A lot of poor women have historically chosen to act as sex work…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 01:12 PM
10

It sounds like Swedish men have it better in some respects. At least according to this guy from the comments: For all the calumny (förtal) against the excesses of Swedish feminism, it is quite different in kind from that in the US. Father's rights, for instance, are much stronger: they have access to parental leave and enjoy default shared custody in cases of divorce. Women work full-time almost as much as men, relieving the breadwinner burden. Alimony has been abolished, and child support is ra…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 12:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter