TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LFuculokinase Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by LFuculokinase on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
22

One of the biggest problems we face in understanding sex differences is that we rely a lot on self-reporting, yet in the terms of Gregory House, "everybody lies." One study concluded that after years of assuming men had way more sex on average compared to women, it turns out that number was highly inaccurate. This was discovered when men were attached to a fake lie detector test http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12806529 Garcia 2008 found that few differences exist overall between genders in te…
/r/PussyPass08/04/17 06:37 AM
8

Oh god. Our education system has failed you. I am so, so sorry. I'll try to explain this as simply as I possibly can, but let me know if I'm being too confusing or using too big of words for you, as I know being a scientist can make me sound a tad bombastic. First of all, even just basic deductive reasoning skills should lead one to the conclusion that that if swallowing DNA led to chimerism, all of us would be incorporating plant or animal DNA as part of our own almost every time we ate (which …
/r/TheRedPill20/01/17 03:54 AM
128

How old are you? I used to laugh at stuff like this and blow it off, but it makes me so sad now that our education system is so horrible that anyone can be this clueless to basic human anatomy past the fifth grade. Women are born with hymens because they're merely left over from the mesonephric duct after the paramesonephric duct starts developing. In other words, the only reason it exists in babies is a leftover structure during fetal development. Assuming the fetus isn't intersex, a female fet…
/r/MGTOW23/12/16 07:21 PM
6

That was the intended concept, but it's an erroneous concept. A woman is born with all of her eggs. These eggs already contain the next generation's haploid DNA, and have contained that DNA since she was a fetus. If sperm have to undergo capacitation and pass three different barriers (the zona pellucida, etc) to be able to penetrate an egg, how on earth would free DNA casually make its way from a Fallopian tube (assuming it even made it to the ampulla) into an egg that's already protected by the…
/r/MGTOW07/12/16 04:10 AM
1

You can use whatever ad hominem you most prefer.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:00 AM
6

I this research really explains this comment more than anything: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06806.x/full
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/16 12:53 AM
1

That's not how evolution works, nor is that how research works. Most people on review boards are older men, not young female feminists. There wouldn't be a feminist article that would ever be published unless it was studying the impact of feminism itself (or published in a sketchy biased journal). I'm also not implying anything is wrong with older men reviewing papers either; it's just reality. And anything portraying obvious preconceived bias that doesn't follow the scientific method is going t…
/r/MGTOW04/10/16 11:07 PM
1

This research would be rather hard to find considering 95% of people have had premarital sex at one point or another. How many sexual partners are you counting as "promiscuous?" Would this degree of promiscuity change according to genetic predisposition such as vasopressin receptors? The divorce mentioned in the first article did not show any correlation between women's perception of their husband's looks and divorce, but if we're including sexual partners to the equation, we'd have to form a do…
/r/MGTOW03/10/16 10:40 PM
1

What you're actually implying seems as if life is even worse for women than it is men. I don't personally believe that, since I think gender expectations can suck for both men and women. But one of those things someone has some kind of control over, and the other someone has no control over. Sure, you can have an exercise regimen or hair cut, but that won't magically change someone's actual facial features. Not everyone has access to 100 grand worth of plastic surgery. In other words, if this wa…
/r/MGTOW03/10/16 06:34 PM
0

Actually, not only are you incorrect in your assumption, but women seem to be almost completely the opposite of what you're implying: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090626153511.htm Women don't seem to have a certain "criteria" when rating men, thus, man fell all over the scale. In other words, a man may be a 3 to one women and an 8 to another. There is also no research I have ever found hinting at certain percentages you mentioned in relation to attraction. Of course, men looking…
/r/MGTOW03/10/16 05:53 PM
2

Sorry, but this isn't backed up by peer-reviewed science in the slightest. I already commented on another post, but I'd be more than happy to share information by giving you a couple dozen links if you'd like. In reality, according to sociological research that has dated as far back as 1966, people date others who are on the same looks and status scale. This has been supported over and over again with both a high p and n value, showing statistical significance. A woman will usually choose a part…
/r/MGTOW03/10/16 05:24 PM
1

Not only is your premise completely erroneous, but men have been shown in multiple peer-reviewed studies to have the higher p value when comparing the relation between the wife's looks and their overall happiness in marriage. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4011637/ Men also seem value looks more when finding a mate in general. Nothing I see backs up your statement in any way. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/24588091/ Let me also point out what I'm providing I'm not pretending…
/r/MGTOW03/10/16 05:05 PM
44

That isn't the way science or evolution works. Evolution doesn't work by choice (as in, men liking beasts wouldn't cause the mutation or cause it to persist), evolution takes place by completely random mutations and subsequent ability to physically reproduce. There's about 70 new mutations each generation, and any of these could lead to viability changes or reproductive changes. Choice doesn't cause this: mistakes do. As someone actually in the science field, we simply don't know why human women…
/r/MensRights02/10/16 07:44 PM
3

Hi, I'm a "cute and skinny" woman. Of course, everyone reading that sentence is probably going to roll their eyes at the ridiculous nature of me having to specifically tell you that to further nullify your argument (and understandably so). Since you seem to be the kind of person who would want me to elaborate, my family was into pageantry growing up, and I went to state for Miss Teen and nationals for Miss. I know random choreography to practically every national song while wearing hand-sewn gli…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/16 07:44 AM
1

Yes, you're definitely right. There's been a ton of studies done on female erotic plasticity, finding that more women than men go back and forth between sexual preference. Not only seem to be naturally attracted to both genders, but also seem to have much better sex with other women (more orgasms and much longer sex). We're definitely hard-wired to be bisexual, most likely for the reason you mentioned, as also stated in the conclusions in research studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/16 05:17 AM
2

There's actually a legit test I had to learn in med school called "the sniff test." Exactly what it sounds like. Case in point: it's not supposed to smell fishy. That's a sign of an infection. Vaginas and penises definitely have their own unique smell, but mine has always just smelled like a vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/16 08:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter