TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LWJ748 Archive

View 0 posts and 116 comments by LWJ748 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

You won't find an exact equivalent because men and women are different. Most men's dress criticisms are around criminal associations with that particular style. It's equivalent in that both men and women in the situation are wearing clothing that could bring criticism or ire , but are choosing to wear it anyway. It's called self agency or free will. Just like the men wearing clothing tied to criminality nobody is forcing women to wear extremely revealing clothing. I just think men and women shou…
/r/MensRights30/07/26 10:33 PM
8

Is that lower effort than parroting feminist talking points? It's also called steelmanning. You won't answer me because the obvious answer proves that we have different standards around self agency between men and women when it comes to choosing clothes.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 09:11 PM
6

Let's say I'm a heavily tattooed and heavily muscled white guy. I decide to shave my head, wear tank tops, tactical pants and boots. I know society has a negative perception of this look, but "I'm doing it for myself". Should I be insulated from any form of criticism?
/r/MensRights30/07/26 06:37 PM
25

They are still interested in women. It's just that the evolutionary itch is being scratched by porn for more and more men. We've all heard of women wanting the top 20%. Online dating has made things far harder for that bottom 80%. Porn had made checking out of the game more attractive for the 80%. So if more men from the 80% check out not only does it remove the guys that are more of women's backup plans, but it removes competition for the top 20% of men. They are less willing to settle down and…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 02:03 PM
14

I have noticed that as well. Essentially if the man doesn't want the exact same amount of sex as the woman he can be called a bad person. It's a really interesting sub from a psychology standpoint.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 05:06 PM
74

Even couples are having less sex than they historically have. Besides just the raw data have a look on the deadbedrooms sub. You'll see a surprising amount of married women complaining about how little interest their husbands have in sex. This is the unspoken thing. Women have always relied on men to have the higher libido so they had to do less romantic work in the relationship. Now that porn more attractive of an option than times past many men are saying that irl sex isn't worth the work. The…
/r/MensRights24/02/26 02:50 AM
15

This truly is a mystery. People that have more sexual partners seem to have a harder time staying in sexual relationships. If only we had something like deductive reasoning to figure out the why.
/r/BlackPillScience24/02/26 02:29 AM
-21

We'll always have some form of patriarchy because of force doctrine. It's just that enforcement of feminism is done through patriarchal means. IE the police, judicial system, heads of state, corporate power etc. Does that make sense?
/r/MensRights11/02/26 01:04 PM
1

I didn't say women are essentially asexual. Just on average they have lower libido. Imagine you have a friend that is really into hiking. You like hiking too, but not as much. He is the one that calls you to go hiking. He plans hiking trips. You can enjoy hiking at the same time as admitting your friend lives for hiking. That's how differing libidos work in relationships.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 07:57 PM
3

Does it make more sense to dress for the 100' walk from the air conditioned office to the air conditioned car or should you dress for the air conditioned environment that you're going to be all day? Secondly you're being intellectually dishonest by ignoring that fact that outside of puritanical groups like Muslims, Orthodox Jews, or Amish women in general show a lot more skin than men. This goes for beach, gym, office, sports, etc attire. Going right to mini skirts and tube tops is a strawman to…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 06:05 PM
2

Assuming the court system cannot be perfect I'd prefer we lean more towards innocence than guilt. A small percentage of guilty people getting away with crimes is preferred to innocent people behind bars. The move towards removing the statue of limitations on crimes outside of murder is a move towards putting more innocent people in prison. Memory is incredibly unreliable especially after 25 years.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 08:30 PM
21

Most feminist talking points have already been destroyed once anyone could look up statistics instead of taking a feminist professor's word for it. The last bastian for feminist talking points was men had/women good when it came to heterosexual relationships. It was simply "he said/she said". Gay marriage statistics have destroyed these remaining talking points. The other one that has been destroyed is "women have just as high of a libido, we just need men to do etc around the house.". Lesbians …
/r/MensRights28/03/25 11:41 PM
10

The idea had it's place at one time. Before tech women were at a disadvantage in the workplace. It would be unfair for a wealthy man to divorce his wife for a younger woman and leave her in borderline poverty after she gave him her best years. Currently it really doesn't make sense and if you look at population numbers we need to eliminate this crap that discourages marriage. Married couples have more kids and typically provide the best outcomes.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 02:06 AM
5

Men's rights movement is about having equal rights with women. Do men have legal reproductive rights that women don't have?
/r/MensRights15/02/25 02:24 PM
9

Our suicide rate is the highest it ever has been. If you track school shootings back to the 50s you can see some school shootings separated by decades between them. Now we are happy if we make it a month between school shootings. Because of the subject at hand infant homicide rates have gone up in the US. Mothers born inside the US kill their infants at 4x the rate of mothers born outside the US. Feel free to disagree with me, but I'm confident historians will look back at this time and wonder w…
/r/MensRights13/02/25 03:35 AM
4

How do you think we can reduce suicides?
/r/MensRights13/02/25 03:02 AM
22

It's interesting that as we've trended away from dealing with our emotions in a stoic manor to fully embracing all our emotions and dwelling in them we've seen suicide and mass shooting rates trending up. We have more access to mental health professionals and more focus on mental health than anytime in history, but things are getting worse. At what point do we say this approach isn't working?
/r/MensRights12/02/25 11:11 PM
16

That's a version of history only a modern feminist could believe. Women worked all the time up until the 50s in most societies. The period of "stay at home wives " was but a blink in our history. They may not have always collected a 1099, but they helped in family businesses all the time. Secondly before modern appliances running a household was very hard work. Someone had to do it. Two people couldn't work full-time. So pre-industrial revolution when 99% of work was hard manual labor it made mo…
/r/BlackPillScience11/02/25 01:33 AM
2

Paternity testing uses partial DNA.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 07:58 PM
4

Paternity tests are a partial DNA test. This could easily be handled by third parties like how the government contracts many other things.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 07:55 PM
24

Exactly or even in the situation of a strict state a father can't go one state over and forfeit his parental right. Guys have to stop white knighting despite obvious inequalities in parental rights.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 07:53 PM
19

Use Occam's Razor. What theory requires less assumptions? One theory has different societies and cultures all influencing women to marry across and up. We don't see a single one that it's reversed. The other is biological preferences influenced by evolution.
/r/BlackPillScience10/02/25 05:37 PM
13

No if the goal is equality it's BS that women are allowed to opt out of motherhood months into a pregnancy and even drop their child off at some firehouses. Alternatively men's rights end the second the sperm leaves the body. Even male victims of statutory can be responsible for child support. Reproductive rights are extremely unbalanced for something that results from a mutual act. Men shouldn't have to white knight for women to maintain far more rights than themselves. That's the opposite of M…
/r/MensRights24/01/25 02:34 AM
2

It's definitely a thing in Western media. The Notebook and The Titanic are very popular romance movies to this day and both are based around cheating. Outlander's central point wasn't cheating, but she did cheat on her husband. The key thing is the hypergamous nature that gets satisfied in the women watching this media. In cheating they find the "better man".
/r/MensRights29/11/24 01:22 PM
9

Feminist talking points...... Corporations and big companies are greedy and only care about money......also women make "70 cents to the dollar a man makes".......yet no companies exclusively hire women.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 11:25 AM
43

Women made male spaces socially unacceptable even though not illegal. I used to play slow pitch softball. Every year a new guy would drop out because of his wife not wanting him to even play one night a week. This goes into other hobbies. A family friend used to go to a board game night weekly with friends. His wife complained all the time about it. He has since stopped and she complains he doesn't leave the house as much. Secondly women are the primary drivers of this new child centric marriage…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 02:30 AM
2

If it was ever taken to the Supreme Court I think they would find it in violation. The other less obvious one is men consenting to parenthood as soon as the semen leaves the body, but women being able to opt out through abortion or even place their 8 month old baby in one of the baby drop boxes we have at many firehouses.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:08 PM
7

Can you refer me to the quote? I can't seem to find it.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 12:42 AM
39

Yeah it's ridiculous. Imagine going to a breast cancer fundraiser and they start off saying they just want to acknowledge how dangerous prostate cancer is. It would be absurd to do such a thing. Anyone that doesn't think we live in a gynocentric society should observe that you can't talk about any men's issues without mentioning women.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 07:21 PM
1

I used to cry a lot more. I got on TRT after finding out I had low T. Now I rarely ever cry. Zero therapy or social constructionism was involved in this change. It was a purely biological change.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 11:25 AM
15

We're in a bad spot because people bought into the social constructionism/blank slate equalism garbage. Men emot differently than women because of our inherent biology not because of social constructionism. Look at female to male transitions after they get in high doses of testosterone. They become less emotional. Look at male to female transitions and you see more emotions once testosterone is blocked and estrogen and progesterone increased. 100+ years ago we thought women were crazy because th…
/r/MensRights20/10/24 10:19 PM
14

That would require feminists having consistency on self agency. Instead self agency is played like Uno Reverse. We don't see this on the male side. If nearly every woman a man dates winds up cheating on him friends or family aren't afraid to tell him he may be the problem.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 05:39 PM
9

Absolutely not. Feminists are not confused egalitarians. A true egalitarian would have stances such as women should be drafted, would oppose laws based on the Duluth model, would support men's right to "paper, financial abortion" if she's prochoice etc. Women with views like I listed are openly mocked by feminist as being "pick mes". Do you see how hard it would be for a truly egalitarian woman to mistakingly label herself as a feminist?
/r/MensRights23/09/24 06:50 PM
0

They could also try selling the car off as being accident free once it leaves the body shop. Or put a different dash on the car with less mileage. Make the car seem more valuable than it is.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 12:19 PM
5

Why are you judging drivers based on the past? Some drivers like to experiment and have an active driving life. It's no indication on how they'll drive in the future.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 04:35 PM
20

If someone gets into four accidents in a year would you say insurance companies are going to increase, decrease, or keep their rates the same?
/r/MensRights31/08/24 11:39 AM
0

I don't see it as being parallel. Feminists view overbearing and obsessed men as toxic. Yet most the men in these books are overbearing and obsessed with her. Controlling behavior is bad but happens a lot in these books.I could keep going on things that the male protagonist does that is considered toxic masculinity by feminists when done in real life. In porn the fantasy is the women are really into sex. Christians don't view a wife that really enjoys sex as a bad thing or "toxic". They view it …
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:27 PM
33

I've always found it interesting that feminists are pretty heavily into romance novels and erotica. It's like they crave men they are told are "toxic" and seek them out in fantasy. All while never connecting the dots that it counters what she's learned through feminism.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 07:04 PM
2

This one is hard to figure out. You need 50% of your clientele to be men. You then proceed to produce a misandrist dating app. Men flee for some odd reason. It's truly one of the great unsolved mysteries of our time.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 12:28 AM
1

Your post won't be liked because a lot of MRAs fall for the same social constructionism/blank slate equalism that feminism preaches. A lot of holes can be seen in feminism because of this and MRA is down the same path. Ignoring humans just look around the animal kingdom. Every species the gender with the highest testosterone levels is the more aggressive and more sexual of the two. Notable is female hyenas because they have far more testosterone than males. It's intellectually dishonest to prete…
/r/MensRights01/08/24 05:51 PM
3

Divorce rates are falling because fewer people are getting married. And the ones that are getting married tend to be more traditionally conservative. You might be right about it cycling back, but I don't think divorce rates are a good indication. If anything the unsubstainability if this will force a return to traditionalism. I recently read that 46% of people over 18 are single. With how gen Z views relationships I see that number rising. It's shocking and a sign of collapse.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 02:27 PM
2

I think that's a pretty wide sweeping generalization. I grew up Christian and conservative right in the heart of the Bible belt and never heard a negative thing about Indian people. I heard many compliments about how hard working and family oriented the culture was. And liberals tend to have a softer opinion on "patriarchy" when it comes with multiculturalism. Perhaps we should look towards the very people hating men within the culture and not obscure opinions of people thousands of miles away.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 01:49 PM
9

That's not true that they want it all back. They don't want male only spaces. They want men to have to share spaces, but women reserve the right to choose between sex segregated or mixed spaces. All while keeping the right to complain about men not acting like women in mixed spaces.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 01:32 PM
3

I disagree. Most women only plan it out once an affair is close to happening or already started. Most women have responsive desire. It's why they favor erotica over porn. Why they aren't usually the ones asking men out. It's why comparing sexual frequency between gay men and lesbians we see gay men have 4x as much sex. Usually affairs come to them. I have listened to a podcast on female infidelity. The women are all anonymous and their stories are told by a narrator. So they have no incentive to…
/r/MensRights10/07/24 04:15 PM
4

I enjoy the irony of posters saying you're not supposed to post about men's issues in a men's rights sub forum. This movement won't go anywhere because of stuff like this. Even a men's rights sub is gynocentric.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:45 PM
15

Just a thought, but in a society that has normalized abortion what's stopping the powers that be from using it if women are drafted for war? We've been told for years it's just a normal medical procedure.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 02:56 PM
1

I can't help but to see the irony of TERFs while trying to fix an issue feminism created. While at the same time not acknowledging the root of the issue. The issue is men and women are different. You can't solve an issue around biological males trying to enter into female chess competitions without highlighting that perhaps the male to female ratio of CEOs is biologically driven and not socially constructed.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 03:28 PM
7

The issue is when women have an unwanted pregnancy we've turned it into a human rights issue. We even have baby drop boxes at fire houses so women can avoid the responsibility beyond birth. When men have an unwanted pregnancy we're hit with "should have kept it in your pants bro". That criticism comes from even the most sexually open people. If you offer the abstinence option towards women you're called puritanical and not "sex positive".
/r/MensRights17/04/24 10:48 AM
12

A lot of the current churches almost view men watching porn as being a "worse" sin than a woman being promiscuous.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 12:12 AM
14

It's not something blank slate/social constructionists want to hear, but it's most likely biological. Perhaps the best evidence of this is the experiences of trans people taking hormones. Biological females taking male levels of testosterone experience less emotion. Biological males taking female levels of estrogen and progesterone while suppressing testosterone experience more emotions. Hormones would be the most obvious outcome of Occam's Razoring this. Saying it's societal from the top down o…
/r/MensRights04/04/24 11:33 AM
2

Is sex work a legitimate form of work? If a boss asks employees if they want to come over and help him move or give him BJs for money is one a Me Too moment? Does 13 year old girl have the self agency to get on birth control and have sex without her parents being involved? Is a 23 year old woman being taken advantage of by her 40 year old BF? Is pornography damaging to women involved in making it? Is promiscuity damaging to women? Are women strong, independent, and don't need men? Should women h…
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:40 PM
2

Society/culture is downstream from biology. Spoken language would be considered a cultural/societal thing, but it wouldn't exist without the ability to form sounds with our mouths. Which is biological. Most everything we do is tied to our biology.
/r/BlackPillScience25/03/24 03:22 PM
52

Look feminists can say whatever they want about how much freedom women had in the past. In the present their freedom of choice comes with the ability to toggle between having self agency or having none. In this situation she gets to choose having no self agency. Women having the same freedom of men will break society if we maintain this ability to go between modes for women.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 10:34 AM
3

It's more biological than the mythical social construction everyone talks about. We have a lot of interesting data from same sex relationships that prove this. The average gay couple has sex more times in a week than a lesbian couple has in an entire month. And if you want to eliminate the human element the only mammal in which females have significantly more testosterone than the males is hyenas. Female hyenas are far more sexual than the males. We also have a lot of experiences of women taking…
/r/MensRights18/03/24 01:55 AM
2

When you say you staunchly support gay rights and minorities you're feeding the same victimhood machine that supports gynocentrism. The only path out of this is to stop focusing on sexuality, race, and gender. Nobody should get special treatment and/or held back because of these things. Support gay rights and the rights of minorities as a default of supporting everyone.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 12:46 AM
17

That's not only a Reddit thing. Try getting relationship advice anywhere aside from red pill content and you'll see a total lack of agency placed on women in relationships l.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 02:04 AM
4

I'll add to that not only is romance media porn for women male attention on social media is also porn for women. They are two things that are widely accepted by our culture. I was at a playground recently with my wife and daughter. I saw one of those public outdoor library racks close by and wanted to see what they had. One third of the books were spicy romance novels literally 50' away from a playground. Women are letting there kids play while the husband is working while fantasizing about have…
/r/MensRights29/02/24 11:52 AM
2

AI keeps learning. Eventually that 90% accuracy will inch up towards 99%. That's accounting for the small percentage of people that have major hormonal disruptions during childhood.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 04:38 PM
14

Statistically that's not true. Men are victims of more crime than women. Also most robbers are not caught and convicted of every robbery they committed. I'll give you another example of the "women are wonderful effect" and how society selectively applies and removes female agency. A 21 year old male and female drink alcohol at a party together. They decide to go upstairs and things get sexual consensually. If she later regrets her decision he could face serious life altering legal repercussions.…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 01:58 PM
19

It's called the "women are wonderful effect". If a man told a story of him being beaten and robbed walking through a rough part of town at 2am people would probably say they felt bad for him and follow it up with you probably shouldn't have done that. Nobody would get accused of victim shaming or absolving the robber of what he did. How is that situation any different than women putting themselves into dangerous situations? The only difference is the sexes. We remove any sense of agency from her…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 01:26 PM
14

I'm seeing more and more articles like this and I think MGTOW is having a real effect. I'm seeing stuff on singles events that no men show up or very little. Men are increasingly not going places just for the sake of meeting women.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 12:51 AM
5

It could be that we as a society rarely mention positive masculine traits. It's just about being less toxically masculine and being more like a woman emotionally. So when women seek a masculine partner they lack the ability to distinguish between positive and negative masculine traits.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 04:28 PM
33

This is non partisan. Conservative women use the term a lot too.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:38 AM
44

My main frustration is if you use the same saying but use women instead of men you're then called a misogynist. "Not all women have hybristophilia(attraction to criminals), but it's always women" would get you labeled a misogynist.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 09:19 PM
3

Exactly the right and left in America are just different forms of gynocentrism. The right wants you to better yourself so when women are done riding the carousel they have someone waiting for them. The left wants men to keep working so they can financially support this unsustainable economy.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 05:08 PM
3

The average age of first marriage for most women in Western countries is 30 or older. Most start having relationships around 15. So a lot of Western women spend the first 15 years of adulthood in various honeymoon stages. We are then shocked when these same women grow board of being married around the 7 year mark. But let's blame it on the emotional load she bears because her husband needs to step up. Has nothing to do with her past.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 11:22 PM
4

Nearly 70% of same sex divorces are women. Why does that matter? Because when men don't have the courts leveraged against them they still rarely initiate divorce.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 11:16 PM
8

Women are encouraged to wear pushup bras, shape wear, and use Botox to fool men into thinking they are younger. They spend billions every year on makeup to enhance their beauty. Filter use is the norm for posting pictures. Women are highly discouraged from being honest about their sexual past. These are all completely normal things in Western countries such as Australia. This is going on at the exact same time that lying about your career and sleeping with someone is rape. The double standard is…
/r/MensRights04/01/24 03:26 PM
8

Don't you see that you're doing the same double standard as the rest of society? You're holding the affair partner to a higher standard than your own mother.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 03:28 PM
8

Imagine equality being called inequality. Feminism has become a meme of itself. It's hard to decipher if an article written by a feminist is real or from the Onion.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 02:07 PM
7

Or she's picky about the wrong things. Height, does he make my pussy tingle, etc instead of future employment potential, character etc.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 08:41 PM
31

Society is at it's strongest when hypergamy is just as controlled as men's hypersexuality. It's collapsing because we're prioritizing female mating strategy at the expense of men. Rome fell because the men didn't feel like it was worth fighting for. A lot of men in the West feel that way already.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 08:37 PM
1

Average age of first marriage for women in the West is 30. By that time most women have given their youth and beauty to half a dozen to a dozen men for less than the commitment of a man willing to marry them. These divorce standards made more sense in a day and age that most women married right after high school and had very little means of making a decent living wage. This is the issue with modern feminism. It wants women to have the freedom of the sexual liberation and to make as much as a man…
/r/MensRights27/09/23 04:18 PM
9

This is so true. If anyone doesn't believe hypergamy is real and innate I challenge you to find a top selling romance novel in which the male is poor or middle wage earner. A warrior type doesn't count because the honor of being a hero is another form of hypergamous status.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 11:21 AM
8

It's mostly because women only cum because of left over penile tissue(clitoris). The orgasm "gap" is akin to complaining about why people with malformed pectoral muscles usually bench press less.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 10:41 AM
8

It's only shocking to people that think monogamy is equal on both sides in our current culture. Look at the Jonah Hill situation. Women are offended if the relationship isn't borderline open on their side and closed on yours. Basically the only thing that isn't broadly excepted is for the women to kiss or f*ck other men. They can maintain contact with all their exes, have a ring of beta orbiters, have a "work husband" etc. So with those realities letting another man be a "bull" to your wife isn'…
/r/MensRights15/08/23 11:16 AM
7

Where the hell did this line of thinking come from? I've seen it posted regarding the Jonah Hill situation. Boundaries in a relationship are a symbolic line that you don't want your partner to cross. Doing so can trigger the end of a relationship or however you want to handle it. But boundaries definitely can apply to the behavior of your romantic partner.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 02:50 AM
2

Be more like females essentially because we're all blank slates and biology has nothing to do with the differences in male and female sex drives.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 02:42 AM
3

This is funny and so easy to refute. Almost 75% of worldwide purchasing is done by women. Consumerism is the number one driver of carbon. Just because it's mostly men in the trucks, trains, plans, and ships doesn't mean men are the cause. Another factor is more households mean more carbon. In the west nearly 80% of divorces are initiated by women. When she has a college degree it's 90%. Women are the main drivers of carbon.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:57 AM
3

I agree. Feminism definitely picks and chooses equality. However I don't think the MRA strategy of pushing total equality across the board is going to provide a better outcome. Men and women are just different. Our society is failing because we're living in this weird false reality of denying these easily seen differences. Just an example is the wait times you have to get into a doctor's office. This wasn't a problem before we pushed for more female doctors. They work fewer hours and retire far …
/r/MensRights07/08/23 06:48 PM
9

My main criticism of most MRAs is they fall into the same blank slate/social constructionism camp as feminists. Nothing will get fixed from this position. Evolutionary psychology reveals a lot of the differences. Men and women have different strengths and weaknesses.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:11 PM
4

A simple way to call out the BS around expectations on how women have to dress at work is to bring up the concept of standard work uniforms. It quickly flips the script. Men would be more on board than women when it comes to uniforms.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 11:32 PM
12

It's due to the victimhood mentality around feminism and patriarchy theory. An oppressed has to have an oppressor. Any hatred from the oppressed towards the oppressor is deemed to be righteous hatred or a lesser form of hatred.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 03:22 PM
5

It's even becoming that way within Western Christianity. You will find many churches that will talk about the sin of pornography while having single mom ministries. Within the public court of Western Christianity a man watching people having sex outside of marriage is considered worse than a woman having sex outside of marriage. Or men are being told not to lust meanwhile women in the church are wearing clothing that would have been considered undergarments not long ago. It's as if speaking out …
/r/MensRights12/07/23 11:26 AM
7

I don't think all women do stuff from monogamy 2.0 for nefarious reasons. I think many just believe this is the norm. They get peer pressure from the sisterhood for not participating. Some of it is because other women don't want to look bad. The thing is I don't think monogamy 2.0 is working well for women either. They either divorce/split at an older age when they have lost some youth and beauty or they are with a husband/boyfriend that is not fully bought in either. They may have been dedicate…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 08:08 PM
50

Since the sexual revolution we've been seeing a shift to what I call monogamy 2.0 and it's kinda been settled on after social media. Essentially women want the relationship to be borderline open on her end and closed on your end. If you dare ask her to reduce advertising her sexuality to other men, having male orbiters, or being able to easily monkey branch into the next relationship you're "insecure". Meanwhile don't you dare look at the cute waitress coming to our table. So essentially the onl…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 02:55 PM
1

The issue I see here is your past isn't truly in your past if an ex can easily contact you. If you want a shot at repairing this get rid of social media and change your phone number. Truly put your past in your past. Spanish conquistadors found that soldiers didn't fight as hard for the mission when the ship was nearby or accessible. So they started burning ships so they had only one option. You need to burn the ship.
/r/RedPillWomen09/05/23 03:59 PM
-1

You can both say women have every right to standards and also acknowledge that increasing standards are causing more incels. The two facts don't have to be mutually exclusive. We have plenty of data from dating apps and sites that prove female standards are pretty high. This is not coming from a bitter incels either. I'm more of the Chad, but I'm worried about the future for my daughter because we're reaching levels of male isolation not seen outside of very polygamous cultures. It's a recipe fo…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 11:56 AM
2

Feminism has become a parody.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 01:03 AM
2

No the reversal would be asking his wife if she's okay with him buying women in a bar drinks.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 04:15 AM
1

I think we are better together than apart. That said feminism didn't just "free women from men". It also freed men from the responsibility of providing for and protecting women. I do find it hilarious that MGTOW is being so heavily scrutinized even though they are doing exactly what feminists have been saying they want.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:49 AM
3

Sarcasm my friend.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 12:10 AM
6

Think about it. If you double the amount of workers, wages then stagnate.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 09:13 PM
5

It's because feminists have been downplaying the differences in the sexes while simultaneously fighting to eliminate male only spaces. This has lead to females spaces being eliminated. The irony is saying they were wrong about the differences in sexes and saying male spaces are fine would make the fight for female spaces a lot easier.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 09:39 PM
31

This should surprise no one. Anything that doesn't fullfil female mating strategy is "misogynistic or insecurities". Even in monogamous relationships most Western women maintain some type of "soft cheating" or keeping options. If that's not enough their will be a push for poly or hotwifing.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 12:34 PM
2

It's definitely happening. It's just not a conspiracy. It's a consequence of a gynocentric society. It wasn't that long ago that it was taboo for a married woman to be without her husband in mixed company with alcohol. Now that's the least of your worries when it comes to cheating like behaviors or cheating vulnerable behaviors. Ultimately it's going to come back to bite women. Fewer and fewer men are wanting to give women the traditional husband while they refuse to be the traditional wife. A s…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 11:45 AM
2

I went to the top topics all time on r/feminism. It's kinda entertaining.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 01:52 AM
2

Hypergamy doesn't just apply to wanting a top 10% financial or status man. It also applies to genetics. Even the preferred penis size when weighed against male average was a 90th percentile penis. It's a tough pill to swallow. If you want a woman you should try to get into as many top 10 percentile categories that women care about. An increasing percentage of men are finding Western women not worth the effort though.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 12:57 AM
8

That's true, but the public message is they are fighting for equality and women can and should do everything a man does. How they handle conscription exposes what feminism really is about.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 12:10 PM
2

As soon as talk of the draft happens the most ardent feminists start using traditional conservative talking points. Feminism will eventually fail because of the amount of inconsistent logic within the movement.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 12:36 PM
1

The old USSR state Whoristan for one and you have Copeland it's right underneath Chadstan.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 10:53 AM
0

Like marriage vows such as "till death do us part"?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 10:56 PM
2

Or look at the amount of ardent feminists that read romance novels constantly. These novels usually don't involve the type of men you'll find at prochoice rallies. They exhibit the same behavior these women say they hate in men. The argument they use is it's just a fantasy. So with that same line of logic here's the opposite. You have a guy that is very public about "healthy at every size" and "beauty is a social construct". Say that same guy watches hours and hours a week of porn and it only in…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 01:29 PM
1

Or a maybe it's biological? We're 60ish years into the sexual revolution. We're 20ish years into culture glorifying high body counts in mainstream media. All the social constructionism theory coming from college campuses seems to be dying out as we have more access to data.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 12:56 PM
9

I don't disagree on the female quality perspective. I'm only 38 for the sake of clarity. I don't see this as purely a generational thing ripping on younger generations. Has social media and the access to it through smart phones not caused some retardation of social skills. I'm sure it's prevalent in younger women too it's just that I don't interact with many women younger than 30 other than brief interactions. I also tend to think men have to work harder at socializing than women. To counter you…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 12:51 PM
3

I'm saying as uninteresting as young men and women are becoming it's easier to see why some are only interested in sleeping with the other sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 12:27 PM
2

You clearly didn't read my post all the way through. I know a fair amount about this. I'm even working on a patent of a hair loss treatment. As I said before as long as a woman has a normal estrogen to testosterone ratio, normal DHT, thyroid, and doesn't have an immune issue she will not experience hair loss. Men on the other hand can have perfectly normal numbers and lose hair. But please tell me how I'm wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 11:36 PM
44

You're absolutely right. This is where I disagree with some of the manosphere. The majority of men are very unattractive and not interesting to women. However like you said the average woman is not exactly a prize either. Physically both sexes are lacking on average. How many people can say they weigh as much as they did when they graduated high school or less. Not many. As far as being interesting I think a big issue is pop culture is so fragmented and women also have their own pop culture. A 4…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 10:32 PM
5

You do realize men and women have very different biology that makes androgenic alopecia far more common in men right? A man can have a perfectly healthy hormone profile and immune system and experience hair loss. Most will lose hair if they don't have Ronald Reagan hair genetics or take finasteride or dutasteride to control DHT. Women on the other hand have to have a screwed up hormone profile or an immune system attacking the hair follicles. Also wearing a wig is far more acceptable for women. …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 08:24 PM
2

Just for reference 6" puts a man in the 76th percentile (larger than 76% of men). 8" would put that man in the 99.99th percentile. So 6" is not "smaller" based on averages.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 09:39 AM
3

If it doesn't matter why aren't you more open about your body count?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 08:28 AM
1

I'm married to a woman my own age so I'm not an advocate of age gap dating. That said some of the commenters putting people that find an 18 year old attractive into the same category as someone that diddles a toddler is disgusting. You're helping lesson stigmas we need in society to protect actual children.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 02:21 PM
-1

Abandoning a child is a terrible thing to do. I say this from the perspective of a father. That said stop sleeping with men that would make for terrible fathers. Single mothers do have some agency in this. Secondly it was incredibly naive to think letting women opt out of motherhood(abortion) wouldn't have any downstream consequences. If it's acceptable for a mother to walk away from motherhood why are we surprised men are more okay with walking away from fatherhood? But the woman doing that is …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 11:35 AM
1

Being open about celebrity crushes is an ick thing to me. Leave that behind after high school. We all get it that more attractive people than ourselves exist. However don't rub it in someone's face then when they wonder how attracted you are to them call them insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 11:11 AM
5

It makes sense though because of hypergamy. If the bottom 90% of men are darn near invisible women are going to be focused on that top 10% of men. That includes things like focusing on male to female CEO ratios, amount of sex a Chad gets vs an average woman etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 11:06 AM
1

I like to think of this using a term red , blue, purple, and no pill can all agree on. That is the honeymoon phase. Now think about the typical life arc of modern women. Average age of first relationship is 15. Average age of first marriage is basically 30. Let's say the honeymoon phase of the marriage lasts until she's 35. At that point she has then spent 20 years in a nearly perpetual state of honeymoon phases. How happy is she going to be going the rest of her life without that feeling? That …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 01:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter