~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Male student expelled for rape after a girl "withdrew consent" for a blowjob she was giving him while he was passed out. His rapist "withdrew her consent" while he continued to be unconscious and he was expelled for rape. Let that sink in.Rape is defined as forcible sex. That's the colloquial definition (i.e. the common language understanding of it). The LEGAL definition varies from one state or locale to another, and often contains some language to the tune of: "penal or digital penetration of any individual's bodily orifice without their consent [i.e. the person being 'penetrated']." So, while that "construction" is indeed truly absurd, it does in fact leave open the possibility of something like OP describes; arguably even a c… | /r/PussyPass | 18/12/15 05:42 PM |
| -16 | Clinton: "If you vote for someone one the merits, one of my merits is I'm a woman"Well, since she's post-menopausal she really isn't any more... not in any functional sense; she (it?) may as well be an androgyne or eunuch. | /r/PussyPass | 14/09/15 01:15 PM |
| -2 | All of these teachers have been accused of sexual misconduct last week: "caught with a male student at home" by husband - "Lie like you've never lied before"; Another "had sex with a student repeatedly in school classroom"Q.E.D. You lead a vivid little fantasy life. | /r/PussyPass | 11/05/15 04:32 PM |
| 5 | All of these teachers have been accused of sexual misconduct last week: "caught with a male student at home" by husband - "Lie like you've never lied before"; Another "had sex with a student repeatedly in school classroom"Sometimes "kids" want to do that stuff. I NEEDED that. Like for real. Kids often "fantasize" about a lot of things that they are entirely UNPREPARED to handle. You "fantasized" about engaging in sex with an adult woman; that doesn't mean you were ready to handle the implications of it were it to actually happen. You probably also "fantasized" about driving a Lamborghini sports car, or some Grand Prix race car... doesn't mean you were READY to actually get behind the wheel of one in real life (no… | /r/PussyPass | 11/05/15 05:50 AM |
| 3 | All of these teachers have been accused of sexual misconduct last week: "caught with a male student at home" by husband - "Lie like you've never lied before"; Another "had sex with a student repeatedly in school classroom"I'm beginning to wonder... whether the mounting number of these will matter... Or whether it's more of just a "time/generation" thing -- i.e. like a paradigm change, where the attitude that "women CAN'T be sex offender/molesters" isn't something that is changed, so much as something that has to "die off"? Will that finally end the "pussy pass"? | /r/PussyPass | 11/05/15 05:42 AM |
| 1 | Are women taught how to abuse the system?That's pretty much exactly how guys DO treat each other: "Dude you forgot your wallet? You should have said that BEFORE we went out for Steak & Lobster... I might have been willing to eat somewhere else or even 'spot' you a couple bucks for a burger, but I ain't paying for your meal when you only tell me AFTERWARDS!" And it is definitely "Get your OWN damn popcorn!" | /r/PussyPass | 27/05/14 01:25 PM |
| 0 | Are women taught how to abuse the system?It still is the teacher's responsibility, especially in 9th grade, to be a major part of the learning process. She did have other avenues, sure. Ooooh, "major part of the 'learning process' "... who do I smell an education major? Because grades are objectively measurable and are a proxy for 'actual knowledge/competence'. No, they are really not. Just about everyone thinks they are, but they're not. I doubt you, being so critical of her narrative, would have believed her had she made any subjecti… | /r/PussyPass | 27/05/14 12:45 PM |
| 1 | Males receive, on average, 63% longer sentences than females for the exact same crime.I will change my opinion when convincing evidence is presented, not the word of some anonymous weirdo on the internet. No you won't. Just as you didn't arrive at your current opinion based on any real "evidence". You essentially "caught" it from the surrounding culture. Secondly, you are the one who is caught up in the "seeking to be convinced" nonsense. If you were actually interested in the truth/reality of the matter, then you would do your own digging. Instead you want to be spoon-fed predig… | /r/PussyPass | 22/05/14 05:23 PM |
| -3 | Males receive, on average, 63% longer sentences than females for the exact same crime.You made the claim, so yes, it is up to you to prove it. No, I made a statement. I don't give a crap if you (with your mindless bien pensant mindset) don't agree with it. Its no skin off my nose one way or another. You will only change YOUR opinion when society as a whole does (if then, in fact even THAT is unlikely, since such societal opinions tend to change in a paradigm-shift manner). | /r/PussyPass | 22/05/14 04:46 PM |
| -3 | Males receive, on average, 63% longer sentences than females for the exact same crime.It's not my job to prove you right. And it's not my job to prove my statement either. Certainly I am not required to spoon-feed it to YOU, since I really don't give a shit whether you have a correct view of reality, or you continue in your ignorance. Since you seem both unwilling, and incapable of doing your own reading (or anything even remotely close to it) ... you will doubtless just continue to believe what you were previously taught (whether that was valid or not), or what others (who have … | /r/PussyPass | 22/05/14 04:27 PM |
| -7 | Males receive, on average, 63% longer sentences than females for the exact same crime.Gee... you spent what < 5 minutes of "research". Wow... that's impressive. (Not!) Moreover, there is no way that you even READ the one document that I gave you a direct link to in that period of time -- at most you "skimmed" it looking for things to reinforce your current beliefs. You're throwing some content at me without actual sourcing No. I'm making a statement that contradicts your current belief -- a belief that has essentially been formed via the UNcritical acceptance of a lot of ideologi… | /r/PussyPass | 22/05/14 03:34 PM |
| -7 | Males receive, on average, 63% longer sentences than females for the exact same crime.I'm gonna need some kinda source for that particular claim. Well then -- rather than simply continuing in your bien pensant belief -- why don't you go look for some data. While male rape/molestation is vastly underreported (even when compared with female rape reports), saying that women do it far more often is a new one on me. Abuse consists of a LOT more than "rape/molestation" (as currently legally defined) -- there are all kinds of neglect & abuse that are not "sexual" -- and even with the la… | /r/PussyPass | 22/05/14 03:07 PM |
| 2 | What the fuck is this subreddit?did you just assume that as a woman, you shouldn't be expected to read? Given that she is a woman, what makes you think she would comprehend what she reads? (unless it's beauty tips or fashion advice or other crap in some gossip magazine ... or of course possibly some pulp-romance novel about pasty white vampires). ;-) | /r/PussyPass | 16/05/14 09:45 PM |
| -1 | Are women taught how to abuse the system?There are free passes because you have tits and I hate them. Do you? Do you really? Fuck that shit, if people treated men and women the same and if men would stop giving the world to women Are you certain you really want that? You made me think of this video (saw it a while back in /r/funny) -- basically a rather dry sketch-comedy of what "dating" would be like in a world where men actually treated women as 100% equals and "stopped giving them things" -- IOW, if they treated women as they treat … | /r/PussyPass | 16/05/14 12:25 AM |
| 2 | Are women taught how to abuse the system?I like you. :) And from your comments in this thread, I think if we met IRL, I would probably like (and enjoy working with) you as well. Same actually of Larry-Man (despite me taking them to task). | /r/PussyPass | 16/05/14 12:12 AM |
| 2 | Are women taught how to abuse the system?Except if you have questions about the material (legitimate questions) and the teacher is ignoring you for the students who are busy flirting it's obviously not fair. And? Who in the world lied to you and told you the world was "fair". Or that the only method of getting questions answered was to garner the attention of the teacher? The first time this happened to me was in grade 9 (it wasn't the last but it was the time I almost failed). Again, people who KNOW a subject (which as a precursor inc… | /r/PussyPass | 15/05/14 02:49 AM |
| 1 | Are women taught how to abuse the system?As for "mansplaining" it's not like this isn't a thing. Of course it's a "thing". But let me "splain" it to you... it exists as a default "assumption" because that assumption is generally proven true. If it wasn't we wouldn't have tons of stories like this one[1] about an award winning author who had her own book explained back to her. Well, duh... of course there are going to be occasional exceptions and anecdotes (as I noted there are often "clueless" and incompetent males as well). That does … | /r/PussyPass | 15/05/14 02:23 AM |
| 8 | Are women taught how to abuse the system?Seriously? I hate not knowing if my hard work has paid off. Not to denigrate "hard work" -- but when it comes to IT, the general rule is that if/when things are considered "hard work" (i.e. stressful and requireing excessive amounts of time/effort) it is generally a sign or symptom of incompetence. It's not always super conscious, I'm not saying that women are idiots. I'm saying that if people give you stuff all of the time you are also conditioned to expect it. As a non-hideous woman I loathe n… | /r/PussyPass | 15/05/14 01:57 AM |
| 6 | Are women taught how to abuse the system?guys spend a lot of time "mansplaining" at them like they don't know what they're doing. Probably because -- again the Occam's razor explanation -- is that they in fact don't know what they are doing. You see, people who actually ARE competent can usually tell (and often fairly quickly simply via body language and facial expressions, levels of stress in voice, etc) when other people (regardless of gender) are incompetent; by contrast the incompetent are essentially (if not entirely) clueless abo… | /r/PussyPass | 15/05/14 01:43 AM |
| 3 | Are women taught how to abuse the system?This exactly. As a Systems Analyst for a major US telecom, I proved I knew my shit from the time I interviewed to when I gave my notice and trained the three people who replaced me. I had no degrees or certifications, but I knew that if they allowed me to interview with someone who intimately knew the details of the job (as opposed to some dipshit HR rep only trained to look for buzzwords), I had a fair shot at it. Yup. And I've worked with a large number of women (as well as men), and only a ha… | /r/PussyPass | 14/05/14 07:22 PM |
| 2 | Are women taught how to abuse the system?women find 80% of men physically repulsive CF http://www.city-data.com/forum/relationships/1980981-survey-finds-women-find-80-men.html And the original/base survey source: http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your-looks-and-online-dating/ As you can see from the gray line, women rate an incredible 80% of guys as worse-looking than medium. Very harsh. On the other hand, when it comes to actual messaging, women shift their expectations only just slightly ahead of the curve, which is a healthier patte… | /r/PussyPass | 14/05/14 03:29 PM |
| 1 | Are women taught how to abuse the system?I'm actually looking for some genuine clarification as to why this seems to happen so much. Because it works. And women observe that it works. It takes a HUGE amount of character to not indulge in something that you KNOW (have seen demonstrated time and again over years, even decades) will give you an advantage. There ARE some women (albeit few in number) who do have that level of character -- but it is significantly rare. And not to be gender-biased, but let's be serious, there are also few MEN… | /r/PussyPass | 14/05/14 03:23 PM |
| 3 | Are women taught how to abuse the system?Not consciously. People give shit to attractive women all of the time. I disagree... and in fact I think that the idea that women AREN'T "consciously aware" of this is a bit sexist and derogatory. For the most part I think women ARE in fact well-aware and HAVE consciously "learned" (been trained) that they (especially the "pretty" ones) can very easily abuse the system... and moreover, things like the educational system gives them plenty of opportunity (and at very low "cost" in terms of consequ… | /r/PussyPass | 14/05/14 03:16 PM |
| 5 | Are women taught how to abuse the system?The women I know who work in IT actually get shit on a whole bunch and treated like retards. And I think there is a very simple reason for this: in my experience the ones who get "shit on" and treated "like retards" generally AREN'T worthy of anything better (in fact most should not even be in the field anymore); and those few (a fraction of the women in the field) who do merit respect are VERY well-treated (highly respected, etc). IT, like engineering, etc -- probably more than many other (i.e.… | /r/PussyPass | 14/05/14 03:01 PM |
| 1 | i'm beyond sure i'm not the first one to bring this up, but why is it only us guys that have to do this?The law that created the selective service was a product of the Vietnam War. Nope. Like the Income Tax and the Federal Reserve, it was yet another "gift" of that most-progressive-President-til-then, Woodrow "woody pecker" Wilson... because he wanted to be able to force people into service so that he could get us involved in the BIG European War (and donchaknow, to "end war" forever)... the one he had just finished campaigning that he would make certain he "Kept America OUT of", riiiiiight. To wi… | /r/MensRights | 23/03/14 11:07 PM |
| 18 | Males receive, on average, 63% longer sentences than females for the exact same crime.Of course men are predisposed to more risk-taking behavior naturally, so there will always be more male criminals. You're actually (whether you realize it or not) falling into the same trap. This mentality/bias that women/men have a disparate tendency towards what is considered "crime" is actually a fairly recent one (historically speaking) -- and for the most part hinges on the subjective definition of "crime". There may be some distinctions/differences in the TYPES of crimes that men will comm… | /r/PussyPass | 15/03/14 08:36 PM |
| 5 | Males receive, on average, 63% longer sentences than females for the exact same crime.63% if just the tip of the iceberg. Bingo. The arrest rates are vastly biased as well, as are the conviction rates. Imagine all the times when the prosecution drops the case because she's "she's learned her lesson and it would not do any good to continue with prosecution". There also is a VERY specific bias if/when the woman has child(ren). | /r/PussyPass | 15/03/14 08:11 PM |
| 0 | Girl tries to steal bike, guys help herYes it was SOLELY on his skin color. The others gave the same responses, openly declaring that the bike did not belong to them and that they were stealing (or attempting to steal) it. | /r/PussyPass | 20/02/14 08:27 PM |
| 1 | Girl tries to steal bike, guys help herAre you saying it was wrong to stop a thief because he was black? The assumption that he was a "thief" was based SOLELY on his skin color. ALL of the other indicators (clothing, attitude, tools, statements) were the same for the other actors. This was in effect a fairly solid "controlled experiment" (the only thing missing, was a "black female" -- and I wish they had done that option because it would have been HIGHLY illuminating as to interplay/conflict between racism/feminine privilege). But n… | /r/PussyPass | 20/02/14 12:00 AM |
| 8 | The majority of child abuse is committed by women, mainly mothers.My personal -and inevitable biased- belief is that women generally aren't capable parents. I think the problem is viewing "parenting" as a uniform activity across the entire "childhood/adolescence". Parenting a newborn or a toddler is a substantially different thing -- and requires entirely different skills, strengths, abilities, etc -- than parenting a teenager (or even a pre-teen). Without question I think that females tend to have more strengths, skills and abilities for parenting the early y… | /r/PussyPass | 11/02/14 10:47 PM |
| 6 | feminisms latest relevant & valuable contribution: work on the creation of a 'feminist programming language'I think that it mainly demonstrates just how much of a farcical caricature (a literal "joke") that so called "feminist ideology" has become. As with many other "feminist" things, she is essentially perpetuating (even expanding) stereotypes. And beyond that -- like a lot of pseudo-academic* things -- she's pretty much just piling a bunch of jargon together in a vain attempt to make it look like she's saying something profound. *And of course academia doesn't exactly have a "lock" on this kind of … | /r/MensRights | 12/12/13 08:34 AM |
| 22 | feminisms latest relevant & valuable contribution: work on the creation of a 'feminist programming language'I don't get the point programming languages aren't designed for men only. They require "logical thinking". Which pretty much by definition means people who operate under a "feminist ideology" (that posits some distinct "feminist logic") will have problems with it. That really is exactly what the author is saying, though I'd be even she doesn't fully realize it. Which, of course... is hilarious. (Especially since the first modern machine-independent high-level language, and on which nearly all th… | /r/MensRights | 12/12/13 08:15 AM |
| 24 | Female babysitter has sex with 2 14-year-old boys, but because of the pussypass, she only got a suspended prison term and probationYup just switch the genders. Mr. X. a 19/20 year old male uses liquor & drugs to obtain sex with 14 year old girls who he claims to have a "relationship" with and one of whom he was supposed to be "babysitting", and then he exposes himself to and molests other young girls in a park? Hell, they'd lock him up for life. (And if the judge didn't, then he'd probably be lynched on his way out the courtroom). | /r/PussyPass | 16/10/13 01:36 AM |
| 31 | Female babysitter has sex with 2 14-year-old boys, but because of the pussypass, she only got a suspended prison term and probationKeep reading... She liquored/drugged them up first. She allegedly plied boys with alcohol and marijuana allegedly supplied by her mother. And... she apparently like exposing herself as well as publicly molesting a host of other boys in parks, etc. --- full photo evidence. ... the pictures of her fooling around with bunch of teen boys in public park surfaced on web. In these pics, Loni can be seen fondling the teens, showing them her bare breast, letting the teen boys fondle her breasts beneath h… | /r/PussyPass | 16/10/13 12:58 AM |
| 12 | Do boys need fathers? I think this video answers that question.Actually I think that shows something that is arguably even more important than that they "need" a father... It is that the boys themselves recognize the lack and therefore WANT a father. | /r/MensRights | 10/10/13 04:06 AM |
| 2 | "But by age 18, girls had become much more involved in preying on others, to the point where they were almost as likely to be perpetrators as were boys.""But by age 18, girls had become much more involved in preying on others, to the point where they were almost as likely to be perpetrators as were boys." Keep in mind this is what they ADMIT to. Very likely females are also just as guilty of preying acts when they are younger (in fact we know from other evidence that they are) -- but this is generally more readily rationalized away (both by the perpetrator AND the victims AND society) as "nurturing behavior", especially with younger siblings, yo… | /r/MensRights | 10/10/13 03:57 AM |
| 4 | Working in a Feminist Dominated WorkplaceIf you take them to court, it'll be your word the word of an oppressive "misogynistic" MAN against all of them poor helpless wimmynfolk, and you'll loose. FTFY | /r/MensRights | 16/04/13 03:46 AM |
| 3 | Opinion: The PlayHaven devs had nothing to apologize for, DongleGate was entirely Adria Richards' fault, and PyCon is stupid.The only reason she had that job is because she is a young attractive female. Well, the fact that she is also a minority racially probably didn't hurt either (how many EEOC points is she worth? especially important in a business that is probably heavily tilted in terms of hiring mainly young while geeky males) | /r/MensRights | 24/03/13 10:55 PM |
| 3 | Opinion: The PlayHaven devs had nothing to apologize for, DongleGate was entirely Adria Richards' fault, and PyCon is stupid.In a sense she's done the tech community, as well as the rest of the world, a great favor in that she's brought to light an otherwise relatively unknown aspect of so-called feminism, its abusers and those who abuse the equal rights laws for a personal agenda. Oh, I bet she accomplished something else she isn't yet aware of. Other tech companies are going to begin looking at what online "activist" activities their various potential employees have been engaging in -- if they spot anyone that even … | /r/MensRights | 24/03/13 08:59 PM |
| 12 | Opinion: The PlayHaven devs had nothing to apologize for, DongleGate was entirely Adria Richards' fault, and PyCon is stupid.This woman should never have been in a PR role, given her past tendencies to drum up outrage from absolutely nothing, which she has made publicly available for all to see through her blogs and twitter posts. Agreed. You know though, what strikes me as perhaps the biggest irony in all of this ... is that probably a major, if not primary reason why she got her specific job (6 figure, ~twice over) was due to sexism, that she was a young, rather attractive thing... and hence useful to be an "evangel… | /r/MensRights | 24/03/13 07:57 PM |
| 9 | Opinion: The PlayHaven devs had nothing to apologize for, DongleGate was entirely Adria Richards' fault, and PyCon is stupid.Don't think Adria "lost" just because she got fired. She's probably signing book deals as we speak. And THAT would be the other reason for a lawsuit... to prevent her from profiting from what was essentially an assault crime committed by HER. A lawsuit would not be a "slap on the wrist", it would be a judgement (or settlement) for a significant amount of money... it would hit her where it counts: in her wallet. It could also include an injunction or "gag" agreement that precludes her from profit… | /r/MensRights | 24/03/13 07:37 PM |
| 37 | Opinion: The PlayHaven devs had nothing to apologize for, DongleGate was entirely Adria Richards' fault, and PyCon is stupid.Not only is there nothing for them to apologize for, they have every right, and IMO the should be suing her (and her employer) for libel & defamation of character. (Here's a lawyer saying the same thing.) She doesn't deserve death threats, and her (former) employer doesn't deserve DDOS'ing -- they (and especially SHE) DO deserve to be sued, and taught an unequivocal lesson regarding the limits of abusive speech, that LIBEL and DEFAMATION are not acceptable, you do NOT get to appoint yourself as … | /r/MensRights | 24/03/13 10:50 AM |
| 1 | Explain it like im five: Why is everyone against circumcision??Right because any of those things could be considered bad or have life long effects. How do you know? It obviously should be up to the infant to decide, rather that YOU deciding for them? Circumcision is the ONLY amputation of a healthy body part on a healthy person, who can not consent. Nope. LOTS of things are done to children, not only without their consent, but often entirely against their outspoken defiance. Everything from a haircut, to vaccinations, to removal (i.e. "amputation") of thing… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/12 07:00 PM |
| 1 | Explain it like im five: Why is everyone against circumcision??zOMG! You're so right. Just like changing diapers, and feeding them, and burping them. Why, we obviously shouldn't be doing ANY of those things. Infants should be deciding for themselves! | /r/MensRights | 09/05/12 01:19 PM |
| 2 | Rachel Maddow claims women earn .77 cents per $1.00 a man makes. Alex Castellanos disagrees with her. Feminist rhetorical tackics ensure. But, it shows our issues are starting to percolate into discourse. Starts at 05:06.All points? I made one point, and your refutation of my point was to sidestep and talk about FDR, which was not even close to what I was talking about. If you think I'm wrong, then present some relevant evidence. Actually dearie, you RESPONDED to my post, and went and digressed off into nonsense-land. I was talking about the origin of Jim Crow laws (Democrats in the 19th century) and when redlining/segregation was made statutory in federal laws (Democrats again -- FDR). And then YOU came in -- o… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/12 07:48 AM |
| 0 | Explain it like im five: Why is everyone against circumcision??Ask yourself honestly, if a random person reading this would think I won or you did. Why the Fuck should I care what a "random person" thinks? And WTF is up with the "I won or you did". I mean could you be any more juvenile? Seriously. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/12 12:08 AM |
| 1 | Rachel Maddow claims women earn .77 cents per $1.00 a man makes. Alex Castellanos disagrees with her. Feminist rhetorical tackics ensure. But, it shows our issues are starting to percolate into discourse. Starts at 05:06.I said that the Southern Democrats are today's Republicans I know that is what you said. But you are simply, completely, and totally WRONG on basically all points. And what YOU are saying is misleading (which is why you {and the Democrats} are saying it, of course). | /r/MensRights | 01/05/12 12:06 AM |
| -1 | Explain it like im five: Why is everyone against circumcision??Being feminine isn't an insult neither is being emotional. It is when you pretend that it is "reason". Are you starting to insult me because you know you have no case? Or is it because you didn't realize this and have lost any chance of winning your position? No, it's because despite your pretense, you are being irrational. You didn't "build a case", nor did you cite any studies of value to refute my points (the "studies" you linked to were both just speculative papers, aka "jokes" in terms of a… | /r/MensRights | 30/04/12 08:20 PM |
| 2 | Rachel Maddow claims women earn .77 cents per $1.00 a man makes. Alex Castellanos disagrees with her. Feminist rhetorical tackics ensure. But, it shows our issues are starting to percolate into discourse. Starts at 05:06.Wrong, wrong and wrong again. BTW, "redlining" and segregation were brought to the north by THE Democrat... FDR -- along with perpetual debt (the wonderful 30-year mortgage) and a host of other crap. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/12 07:46 PM |
| -1 | Explain it like im five: Why is everyone against circumcision??Done with your feminine-emotional rant yet? Or do you have even more to crap out? | /r/MensRights | 30/04/12 07:44 PM |
| -2 | Explain it like im five: Why is everyone against circumcision??Yeah just keep telling yourself that. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/12 06:38 PM |
| -3 | Explain it like im five: Why is everyone against circumcision??You are attempting to impose your beliefs on EVERYONE (specifically other parents AND their children). ...Just like the Feminazi's. In fact, on this issue, you are very specifically emulating the Feminazi's. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/12 05:19 PM |
| -2 | Explain it like im five: Why is everyone against circumcision??Wow... you really have a lot of BS shoved up there. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/12 05:09 PM |
| -2 | Explain it like im five: Why is everyone against circumcision??I think you mean "imposing your beliefs onto others". | /r/MensRights | 30/04/12 05:06 PM |
| 0 | Rachel Maddow claims women earn .77 cents per $1.00 a man makes. Alex Castellanos disagrees with her. Feminist rhetorical tackics ensure. But, it shows our issues are starting to percolate into discourse. Starts at 05:06.People imagine a lot of things. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/12 05:06 PM |
| 3 | Rachel Maddow claims women earn .77 cents per $1.00 a man makes. Alex Castellanos disagrees with her. Feminist rhetorical tackics ensure. But, it shows our issues are starting to percolate into discourse. Starts at 05:06.If you're black and you're conservative, you're a Self-hating, Uncle Tom, white boot-licking negro. And how ironic is that. Jim Crow laws were instituted and the South was run by DEMOCRATS. And then the racist segregationist things like "redlining" were also implemented by DEMOCRATS. To me the "Self-hating, Uncle Tom, white boot-licking negro(s)" were (and alas, still are) the ones who get duped (again and again) into voting for the D's. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/12 05:05 PM |
| -12 | Explain it like im five: Why is everyone against circumcision??Neither of those are data-based studies -- and they are both on HIV (completely ignoring all other STD's) -- the one ("How the circumcision solution in Africa will increase HIV infections") is a ridiculous joke, and despite the provocative title, it does NOT deny (nor does t contradict) that circumcision IS an effective method of reducing STD infections, merely that they believe OTHER treatments would be MORE effective (and then specifically only regarding HIV). What else do you have shoved up t… | /r/MensRights | 30/04/12 12:34 AM |
| 17 | Rachel Maddow claims women earn .77 cents per $1.00 a man makes. Alex Castellanos disagrees with her. Feminist rhetorical tackics ensure. But, it shows our issues are starting to percolate into discourse. Starts at 05:06.Sorry, wasn't certain if that was what you meant. This study discusses the impact of "emotional appeals" on voters. Note that such appeals work on ALL voters (both male and female) but they have a significantly higher impact on/appeal to women voters. I have seen other studies that show similar things -- that women tend to vote (for example) in higher numbers for "younger/more physically attractive or charismatic" candidates (i.e. Kennedy over Nixon, or for the political party reverse, Schwarzen… | /r/MensRights | 30/04/12 12:28 AM |
| -13 | Explain it like im five: Why is everyone against circumcision??I could pull better studies out of my ass. Since it would seem that this is your main source of data, I would not be surprised at all if you did. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/12 12:18 AM |
| 2 | Women are becoming more violent everyday.Good point, for some reason I had not thought of that... As women as a whole spend more time in the public sphere, so does the violence-prone portion of women. Yes, and couples are getting married later and less frequently (and divorced sooner and more frequently) -- which also increases the time women spend "in the public sphere". One aspect of the "divorce" scenario is that intra-family violence is more likely to have additional witnesses (i.e. "step" relations) and it is less likely for the f… | /r/MensRights | 30/04/12 12:18 AM |
| 2 | Women are becoming more violent everyday.more people are acknowledging its existance and don't pretend it doesn't exist? THIS. Plus, the violence is probably no longer "hidden" behind the closed doors (i.e. confined to the home with the husband and children being the chief victims). | /r/MensRights | 30/04/12 12:03 AM |
| 11 | News video of 11 year old boy sexually assaulted. No charges.Since these girls weren't doing it for sexual gratification purposes Says who? | /r/MensRights | 29/04/12 11:52 PM |
| 10 | News video of 11 year old boy sexually assaulted. No charges.Because the family is not wanting to press charges. Entirely IRRELEVANT in a case like this. The victim's cooperation/testimony would NOT be needed in order to prosecute. Prosecutors ARE in fact "pressing charges" but they are only being charged ("ticketed") with misdemeanor "assault" when in fact this was a gender related sexual assault of a child (on a young, pre-pubescent victim -- i.e. a "child" not an age-peer "teen"). That is the travesty here. If the genders were reversed, you can be cert… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/12 11:51 PM |
| 4 | Rachel Maddow claims women earn .77 cents per $1.00 a man makes. Alex Castellanos disagrees with her. Feminist rhetorical tackics ensure. But, it shows our issues are starting to percolate into discourse. Starts at 05:06.You want a study link? (They HAVE been done.) Or ??? | /r/MensRights | 29/04/12 11:34 PM |
| -25 | Explain it like im five: Why is everyone against circumcision??Sorry junior, they are not "bullshit". Edit: A totally insignificant number of uncircumcised men get circumcised later in life. It is insignificant and don't pretend otherwise. Wow. That's like REALLY convincing (not!) | /r/MensRights | 29/04/12 11:34 PM |
| -19 | Explain it like im five: Why is everyone against circumcision??Ever heard of condoms and proper sexual education? If you think condoms are the be all and end all (as you seem to) then you haven't learned what you need to know about STD's. I'm sure you have citations for this? Those that do are probably brainwashed into believing it is in their best interest or do due to religious indoctrination. Yeah, that's the way to ignore other men's medical decisions -- call them "brainwashed". Yup... it HAS to be because, well they made a different choice than you (ho… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/12 11:32 PM |
| 11 | Rachel Maddow claims women earn .77 cents per $1.00 a man makes. Alex Castellanos disagrees with her. Feminist rhetorical tackics ensure. But, it shows our issues are starting to percolate into discourse. Starts at 05:06.Furthermore, why is this election about women and the economy? Men and boys are faring worse at all levels and were hit the worst by the economic downturn yet both presidential candidates are turning towards women? Because women vote in higher numbers, and they generally tend to base who they vote for on "emotional" appeals/issues rather than rational analysis of policies. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/12 11:08 PM |
| 1 | Mrs. Control Freak And Mr. Spineless Eat OutI don't see the men's rights issue in this article. I don't either. There isn't a reference to a MAN in the article. There's a lot of stuff about some whiney, pussy-whipped guy though. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/12 10:56 PM |
| 2 | Why are anti-men commercial like this acceptable? What if ads showed stupid white people and smart black people?The reason, to be fair, is that women buy more. Should have stopped the sentence there. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/12 10:49 PM |
| -27 | Explain it like im five: Why is everyone against circumcision??4) Myths and misconceptions about it preventing AIDS and other diseases. Not a myth at all. Circumcised men have significantly lower rates of both acquiring AND of transmitting several STD's. See the CDC fact sheet 6) You don't see any adult men lining up to get circumcised do you? Actually, a not insignificant number of men DO. If circumcision is so beneficial, then I'm sure we could all leave it to men to get it done when they're adults. Not if you are constantly in denial of the benefits (i.e… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/12 10:46 PM |
| -7 | Explain it like im five: Why is everyone against circumcision??"Everyone" isn't. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/12 10:40 PM |
| 1 | Man Rescues Drowning Boy, Mom Accuses Him of Being a Pedophile « FreeRangeKidsMeh, because it is GOOD to see that the "FreeRangeKids" mom/blogger is noting and highlighting this kind of thing (i.e. spreading the word beyond reddit). I find that the "FreeRangeKids" mom with her ANTI-paranoia campaign is one of the few sane & rational beings on the planet (and thus she gives me some small hope for the future of humanity). | /r/MensRights | 29/04/12 02:36 PM |
| 2 | What's sauce for the goose is no longer sauce for the gander...'When a boy plays, it leads the way for other male players to come in and take over.’ But... but... what happened to women/girls being just as good/smart/capable as men/boys? | /r/MensRights | 29/04/12 02:27 PM |
| 4 | Chick fell in love and had sex with her foster son, then committed indecent assault on another boy of similar age. Disgusting and horrible !!Mmmm, OK. That is not a "chick"... the woman is 57 years old. It's like a Grandmother assaulting a grandchild. EDIT: Riches, who was in her 30s at the time [...snip] So (apparently) this is about incidents that happened a couple of decades ago. Still, it's more evidence that puts the lie to the caricature (a pervasive one in social workers) that all women are "nuturing" and "incapable of assault". | /r/MensRights | 29/04/12 02:25 PM |
| 1 | Today I pissed off a woman by exercising "equal" rights.Do you mean "the same thing" as a slip of the tongue? No. You proposed two possible reasons: I don't know if she genuinely meant it, OR it was a slip of the tongue/Freudian slip. I took the "/" (and the absence of another "or" which would have created 3 options) to mean that YOU understood/meant that "slip of the tongue" was the same thing as a "Freudian Slip" -- in point of fact they are entirely different.* What I was saying is that #1 she genuinely MEANT it and #2 Freudian Slip are in fact th… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/12 04:55 PM |
| -9 | Today I pissed off a woman by exercising "equal" rights.I honestly believe real feminism should be called egalitarianism Ummm... "egalitarianism" isn't about being treated equally... it is about an equal outcome for everyone (i.e. a society that refuses to reward merit, or to allow slackers to fail). Basically a form of communism, with everyone "flattened" to the exact same level. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/12 07:45 AM |
| 2 | Today I pissed off a woman by exercising "equal" rights.Women fight to have PRIORITY over men? I don't know if she genuinely meant it or it was a slip of the tongue/Freudian slip. Ummm... a "freudian slip" is simply the accident revealing of what she "genuinely meant". So either way, it means the same thing. That woman revealed that she doesn't want (mere) "equality" -- she wants privilege/power/position -- aka PRIORITY. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/12 07:40 AM |
| 2 | Dad of the year nominee - Exposes bullying by teachers by putting a wire on his son.and believe that men are the enemy Worse, they believe that males are the enemy... and since they cannot successfully abuse MEN, they instead take it out on BOYS. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/12 06:59 AM |
| 6 | Dad of the year nominee - Exposes bullying by teachers by putting a wire on his son.And yet another (similar) Teacher & Teacher Aide bullying yetanother special needs student (including ad nauseum whispering negativity that is enraging to hear when you realize the context). Again, this is NOT that rare. (And it isn't just special needs kids this happens to, ANY child where an abusive teacher* is certain they can get away with it {i.e. where they know any complaint the child makes will be dismissed as lying/whining by the parents} is a potential victim vulnerable for this kind o… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/12 07:34 PM |
| 3 | Dad of the year nominee - Exposes bullying by teachers by putting a wire on his son.BTW, this kind of thing is a lot more common than many people think. Here's another instance: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/16/julio-artuz-15-records-teacher-verbally-abusing_n_1097166.html | /r/MensRights | 25/04/12 07:14 PM |
| 3 | 'dirty DUIs' in Contra Costa County -- women hired "detective agency" to entrap the spouses they were divorcing (or divorced from) so they could claim in court the man was a drunk-driver & safety risk to children -- this shit is NOT just urban legend.You thought it was urban legend? Nope. But I know many people who have claimed that it is. Having had many friends get completely screwed over by their ex-wives, I already know that many women will stop at nothing to a) get revenge, and b) get everything they can. This article simply provided some solid PROOF of what is actually going on. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/12 06:49 PM |
| 3 | 'dirty DUIs' in Contra Costa County -- women hired "detective agency" to entrap the spouses they were divorcing (or divorced from) so they could claim in court the man was a drunk-driver & safety risk to children -- this shit is NOT just urban legend.NO ONE should ever get behind the wheel when they are clearly intoxicated. It's bad for everyone involved, and society at large. Well, the men in this case were emphatically NOT "clearly intoxicated", the police were specifically called by the detective (see page 2 of the article), to wit: Once Dutcher got into his truck, Butler called a police officer friend to report Dutcher had been drinking. Butler maintained the officer was not paid by him and did not know Dutcher had been set up. The offic… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/12 06:43 PM |
| 2 | 'dirty DUIs' in Contra Costa County -- women hired "detective agency" to entrap the spouses they were divorcing (or divorced from) so they could claim in court the man was a drunk-driver & safety risk to children -- this shit is NOT just urban legend.Too many people want to judge and charge others by what could have happened, rather than what actually happened. There is also what is known as a "Fundamental Attribution Error", to wit: Fundamental Attribution Error [...] describes the tendency to over-value dispositional or personality-based explanations for the observed behaviors of others while under-valuing situational explanations for those behaviors. The fundamental attribution error is most visible when people explain the behavior of oth… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/12 05:51 PM |
| 2 | 'dirty DUIs' in Contra Costa County -- women hired "detective agency" to entrap the spouses they were divorcing (or divorced from) so they could claim in court the man was a drunk-driver & safety risk to children -- this shit is NOT just urban legend.Maybe...just maybe...MensRights is more rational than emotional compared to the rest of Reddit. I think it is both this AND the context of the thread. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/12 05:44 PM |
| 4 | 'dirty DUIs' in Contra Costa County -- women hired "detective agency" to entrap the spouses they were divorcing (or divorced from) so they could claim in court the man was a drunk-driver & safety risk to children -- this shit is NOT just urban legend.You are forgetting that there was SPECIFIC INTENT here. The "detective" (and his hired "agents provocateur") set out with the very SPECIFIC intent to CREATE exactly this situation -- per their instruction from the detective and his client (who again, SPECIFICALLY wanted a situation created whereby "evidence" could be obtained). In addition this "detective" was himself a former police officer, and he apparently had the local police "on call" as part of this scheme. (IOW the men were not pulled ov… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/12 05:43 PM |
| 7 | 'dirty DUIs' in Contra Costa County -- women hired "detective agency" to entrap the spouses they were divorcing (or divorced from) so they could claim in court the man was a drunk-driver & safety risk to children -- this shit is NOT just urban legend.I don't understand what's wrong with this? Apparently you don't comprehend the concept of "entrapment". Go learn. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/12 05:33 PM |
| 8 | 'dirty DUIs' in Contra Costa County -- women hired "detective agency" to entrap the spouses they were divorcing (or divorced from) so they could claim in court the man was a drunk-driver & safety risk to children -- this shit is NOT just urban legend.NO ONE should get behind the wheel of a car drunk. NO ONE should get behind the wheel of a car drunk *while tired or sleepy (because THAT impairs attentiveness even MORE than being drunk). As do a host of other things -- applying make-up while driving; yakking on a cell phone while driving; having an argument with another vehicle occupant while driving; etc, etc. Also, the term "drunk" has been steadily redefined downward to lower and lower blood alcohol levels (where "impairment" is far less ce… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/12 05:30 PM |
| 4 | 'dirty DUIs' in Contra Costa County -- women hired "detective agency" to entrap the spouses they were divorcing (or divorced from) so they could claim in court the man was a drunk-driver & safety risk to children -- this shit is NOT just urban legend.Not to mention a brain the size of a peanut. Wants evidence of DUI, but doesn't want consequences of DUI... yeah, uh huh. Not too bright. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/12 05:28 PM |
| 1 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailThe very first thing I would like to do is apologize for any offense I may have caused with my user name. You are the first person to announce any problem with it, and I do apologize. I'm not "offended" by it. I am saying that I implied from it that you were a "women do everything better" type; and that "Boobs [Females are capable of/needed to] Fix Everything [which was screwed up by penises]". The general kind of idiocy I have heard my entire life from even the mildest milquetoast "feminist" (e… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/12 11:35 PM |
| 1 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailThat's a radical feminist notion, as far as I can tell. The problem with ALL labels or names (denominations) whether in politics or other fields, is that while those who use the label may cover a great spectrum, the definition of the label itself is variable. And whatever anyone's position on such a spectrum (especially in regard to certain beliefs or agenda items) there will be, almost by definition people who are further (more extreme or "radical"), just as there will likely be many who are le… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/12 05:19 PM |
| 1 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailYeah, not buying it. Feminists are not working towards "equality" but rather for a special new "privileged" status (purportedly as a correction for previous generations' wrongs -- thus privileging/punishing a new generation in a reverse fashion), but without giving back the previous privileges that were existent in the previous paradigm. MRM is basically attempting to push back -- to prevent the (new) "privileges" and/or to equalize things across the board. And BTW, "Boobs" do not fix anything. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/12 04:28 AM |
| 2 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailI think you're again dead-on. I've considered before that people are frustrated they feel the disparity between their reality, and the expectations they had/have of it. What did Palahniuk say in Fight Club? “We've all been raised on television to believe that one day we'd all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars. But we won't. And we're slowly learning that fact. And we're very, very pissed off.” -Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club Oh, most definitely. Virtually ALL little girls are raised o… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/12 02:59 AM |
| 1 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailIn the short time I've been around, 26 years, I would agree with you - look at the Lincoln-Douglas debates. They made long, difficult, and specific points with one another. We've found ourselves in a culture of sound-bites, and not every idea can be circumscribed in short bursts of interesting dialogue... Well, that was a specific instance... there were many others that were not so "civil" during that era. We have definitely lost the distinction between "debate" (in it's formal sense) and argume… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/12 02:27 AM |
| 1 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailThanks again for the dialogue & awesome responses - it seems like most people on reddit dismiss/attack/hurl insults at me when I ask questions lol Well, that does seem to be not only much of Reddit... but the way of our society these days. (And in truth, it's probably NOT just "these days" but rather the way human societies have always functioned -- or more correctly, "dysfunctioned". Though over my lifetime there DOES seem to have been a steadily increasing emphasis on "perception" rather than … | /r/MensRights | 03/04/12 01:37 AM |
| 1 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailWell, just I think you are/were maybe taking them too far, and as if they were more than mere "thoughts". I really do NOT know what makes these people do these things. (And AFAIK, no one else knows either.) There are LOTS of other theories (power-seeking, lack of affection in current adult relationships, previous abuse themselves as children, parental distance, etc). | /r/MensRights | 02/04/12 11:06 PM |
| 1 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailah, I was wrong then, thank you for the time you spent composing that reply (since your data checks out to my searching I can't fault that) and for expanding my mind. You're welcome. Alas, but the media (and most especially the sensationalistic types like "America's Most Wanted" and "To Catch a Predator") has created an entirely fictitious "bogeyman" (aka societal scapegoat) and they encite a huge (and unnecessary) paranoia around it. Plain fact of the matter is that the vast majority of "sexual… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/12 10:09 PM |
| 1 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jail2) feminists are working on feminist issues, not men's rights issues. So, then they are NOT (as they so often claim) working on "equality" issues. Just to make that clear. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/12 10:07 PM |
| 1 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailI hadn't considered that most teachers don't have the opportunity to mature because they haven't been presented with a social opportunity/necessity to. I would NOT say that.* In fact I said the opposite -- that the vast majority of teachers (probably 99%) of them DO mature -- just that their career path makes it a bit more difficult (on exit from the schooling system they do NOT go out and work primarily amongst age-peers and older adults like virtually everyone else does, but rather they return… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/12 09:59 PM |
| 1 | My experience from 2 years ago.Yeah I see your point. That level of selfishness should classify as crazy though lol. To wreck a 25 year old's life to save face...I could never do that to someone. Even someone I straight up hate, and she was friend up until I got into a fight with her sex buddy. Ugh, it's been 2 years and it still really bums me out when I think about it. No doubt. You probably also wouldn't go to the police in the first place. (And people who DO "go to the law" over trivialities are indeed a form of "crazy" i… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/12 06:39 PM |
| 1 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailReally? Why? I kind of meandered all over the place and in the end there really is no conclusion there. Some of it (the historical "trending" & creation of concepts like childhood, adolescence, etc) is well documented elsewhere (books have been written). BTW it is not that children and adolescents didn't exist prior to the concepts (just as gravity pre-existed Newton), but rather that our "view" of them as somehow being distinctly definable "phases", rather than existing on a continuum was somet… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/12 06:19 PM |
| 1 | My experience from 2 years ago.I doubt there would be a jury for a little disorderly conduct case. The charge (and what would have gone to the jury) was not "disorderly conduct" -- that was what was offered to the guy as a plea bargain. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/12 06:38 PM |
| 3 | My experience from 2 years ago.Yeah, to make the lie as bold and so far from the truth to me is a little crazy. Especially when you're telling it to the police. I think a LOT of it happens almost "inadvertently" -- the police are ALWAYS tempted to ask "leading questions". So, say she said you slapped her butt... the police will more or less say (or if not verbal then give her other clues in the form of body language, etc) "and was that all". At that point she is stuck: SHE got herself all worked up with outrage and chose to g… | /r/MensRights | 31/03/12 06:36 PM |
| 1 | A long list of female teachers who raped children, where the judge and mass media look the other way. Fewer altar boys were sexually molested compared to the number of children on this list.Sexual offenders will always look for positions where they can get into a position to abuse Personally I think this "begs the question". There really MAY be a different reason for the correlation -- that people in these positions (being surrounded by young people) lose the distinctions in age. You kind of hinted at that with your other statement: Yes it happens and its sad, but this is a problem that happens in all professions that pertain to children, not just the catholic church. So the kinds … | /r/MensRights | 31/03/12 06:05 PM |
| 2 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailWhen I say "trend" I don't mean "something that's only just now happening" - I'm referring to the qualitative data on these women: what are the correlative factors amongst them? I'm curious about why they would do this - what's the payoff? What's going on in their minds that makes them want to do this? I would venture to speculate (and that is all that it is) that they are still very much in a "high school girl" mode mentally & emotionally, and that internally (at least while they are in their o… | /r/MensRights | 31/03/12 05:53 PM |
| 1 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailwhen I noticed that you contradicted yourself in the same message: I didn't contradict myself at all. Had you actually READ and comprehended what I wrote (instead of merely skimming it looking for some reason to dismiss/discard it). The 1/3 was for the specific even in Salem, whereas the "Historically, far more MEN" was referring to he much broader history in England and Europe. Men were burned at the stake or more likely tortured but not for witchcraft but for heresy and other crimes, witchcraf… | /r/MensRights | 31/03/12 05:13 PM |
| 1 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailThat's sort of what I mean, I'm guessing a lot of those figures are drawn from people who receive the normal massive sentencing and subsequent horrendous treatment within prisons. From the studies I was aware of and looking at closely in the late 1990's, most of the data was drawn from people caught convicted and sentenced decades previously, mostly in the 1960's & 1970's when the sentences were really NOT that harsh, a year or two in prison and then a few years of probation (i.e. well before th… | /r/MensRights | 31/03/12 05:08 PM |
| 0 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailWell it is like if women in the Middle Ages asked not to be saved by the preposterous accusation of witchcraft but asked that Magicians be burned at the stake along with Witches. Historically, far more MEN were "burned at the stake" for so called "witchcraft" (and other forms of "heresy") than women. You seem to be basing your concept of that solely on distorted Hollywood versions of the "Salem witch trials", which seems to portray the victims as all beautiful WASPish blonde teenage girls -- the… | /r/MensRights | 30/03/12 08:22 AM |
| 1 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailShe'll get out, she will not have changed. She will do it again. Actually, that is pretty unlikely. People who have been caught, convicted and significantly punished for molesting (and then released a few/several years later) -- subsequently have one of the lowest rates of recidivism of any class of criminals. (Not that it doesn't happen, but it is in the single digit percentages, i.e. well under 10% -- whereas virtually all other classes of felons tend to commit new crimes at percentage rates i… | /r/MensRights | 30/03/12 08:09 AM |
| 4 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailTrend? That presumes that women haven't always done this. Studies done in Canada show that this kind of thing (women raping boys & girls, prepubescent as well as teens) has been going on for many decades (basically as far back as they could study) -- what has changed is that it is only recently that women have begun getting charged with it, previously the children/teens were simply told they were lying if they reported it. As to motivation? What is the motivation for ANY full adult (male OR fema… | /r/MensRights | 30/03/12 07:57 AM |
| 3 | Yep, this is what you call fair justice system: woman rapes boy 300 times, gets 29 months of jailThe first rule of feminism is that blaming any/all males involved (or even entirely uninvolved)... is the default. What I am surprised at is that there weren't any posts demanding the boy be charged and locked up for causing this poor sad little woman such problems. And I wish I could put a /S here. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/12 07:41 AM |
| 1 | What do you think of artificial wombs?Yeah, also kind of "scary" with the implications. Lets put it this way: you know how every now and then you read an article or hear mention on some TV show that "FUSION" is just a decade (or two) away, or that "artificial intelligence is just around the corner", or that "we could have a man on Mars within 20 years" ... and other assorted speculative stories? Well, I think the technology for an "artificial womb" will probably be implemented LONG before any of those come around. Because in the cas… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/12 03:18 AM |
| 1 | What do you think of artificial wombs?clone uterus, as in biological cloning, where you grow a copy of something by putting its genetic material in an egg. are they actually attempting to grow a uterus? From my understanding what most of the current research is attempting is taking cells from a uterus wall (typically mouse), and them cloning/growing those cells into "sheets" and layering these into the equivalent of an independent uterus wall that has blood vessels & supply integrated to provide nutrients & oxygen and remove/filter … | /r/MensRights | 05/03/12 07:04 AM |
| 6 | What privileges, if any, do women have that men don't?I work in an office with all men. It's awesome. No drama, no manipulation, and no double standards being used against me. Enjoy it while you have it! And yes, I too have been fortunate enough to have had that experience as well; it is one of the reasons that the "double standard" was so glaringly obvious in the offices with significant female presence, (it seems that one or two females, especially of the {rare} sane & competent variety CAN function as normal professional human beings). But... on… | /r/MensRights | 05/03/12 06:30 AM |
| 6 | What privileges, if any, do women have that men don't?In my experience, they can frequently get away with almost total incompetence in the workplace, with virtually no fear of being fired (because there is always the "trump card" of being able to claim that the cause of the firing was "sexism"). Likewise, they tend to be able to get away with a host of other behaviors in the workplace -- any and all of which would be considered entirely unprofessional in a male -- everything from faux emotional "breakdowns" (which are actually a disguised form of m… | /r/MensRights | 05/03/12 04:06 AM |
| 1 | Who oppresses men?Google an old work called "The Garbage Generation" -- readable online. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/12 03:50 AM |
| 1 | What do you think of artificial wombs?From what I understand, while there are a lot more detailed aspects to it, that IS basically what they are doing. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/12 03:37 AM |
| 1 | What do you think of artificial wombs?It still has senses, even if the environment is muted. You don't want to grow the fetus in what amounts to a sensory deprivation tank. But THAT is exactly what the amniotic sac IS -- the virtual equivalent of a "sensory deprivation tank", and the senses ARE in fact almost entirely muted (of necessity, to provide a safe environment for the VERY VULNERABLE fetus to grow). The mother moves about. It experiences sounds and touch sensations, warmth, the beating of the mother's heart, some elasticity … | /r/MensRights | 05/03/12 12:09 AM |
| 2 | What do you think of artificial wombs?And I don't know what you are trying to accomplish. Your scenario regarding "salvaging" a potentially aborted fetus, certainly isn't an original or novel one -- virtually every article (for the past 20+ years) that discusses "artificial wombs" either includes it in the text as being some driving factor (which as I've pointed out it logically CANNOT be, because if the OTHER forces do not bring such a technology into fruition and legal acceptability, then it would preclude such a base technology f… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 03:02 PM |
| 5 | Female journalist discusses contempt for men on national TVLink to the Press Release about this (remarkable) woman journalist's presentation: "From Women's Rights to Feminist Wrongs: Contempt for Men in Contemporary Society" Also, the sponsoring organization's website: Canadian Association for Equality which has some other good stuff as well! | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 01:58 PM |
| 5 | Female journalist discusses contempt for men on national TVOn American TV, she would have been interviewed by a woman (or at best a woman/eunuch "team"); AND they would have made absolutely certain to have at least one additional guest (a feminist) to provide a "counterpoint", and then possibly a third guest (someone supposedly "neutral" but in actual fact just a less-radical feminist). And of course -- as a result -- it would have descended into a four-against-one shout-fest, with them verbally bludgeoning her into silence. *Sigh* | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 01:49 PM |
| 2 | What do you think of artificial wombs?Yes, but the point in discussion is wider than just mensrights -- MR and the desire to have children FREE from the threat of custody loss is only one (and probably one of the smaller) societal forces/factions that will likely bring about the advent and widespread availability of artificial wombs. The "save the fetus from abortion" force/faction may be one of them, but it will be the least possible/practical, and will (if ever) follow significantly AFTER an artificial womb technology is already d… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 01:28 PM |
| 2 | What do you think of artificial wombs?I disagree here. I do want children, even as a single parent, and would be reluctant to have one with a woman given the current laws. Same here... except it is the current laws and societal attitudes (which are biased against FATHERHOOD as well as men in general). And we are not alone, these guys are proof: Cristiano Ronaldo 46 yr old Miami Doctor Toban Morrison (Candian) And an increasing number of other SINGLE men using surrogates. Not to mention a the increasing number of single men willing/t… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 11:52 AM |
| 1 | What do you think of artificial wombs?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ectogenesis | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 11:30 AM |
| 1 | What do you think of artificial wombs?I can only see this being of interest to those who can't go the original way. Sort of like how IVF is only used by those who "can't go the original way". And we've seen just how RARE that is... oh, wait, you mean it ISN'T rare? Well, what about all those 50+ year old "career women" who now long for a child they cannot have? There will be a BIG faction of people who would support the availability of such a technology (and just like IVF -- aka "test tube babies" -- they will do so regardless of th… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 11:29 AM |
| 3 | What do you think of artificial wombs?Like in the case of a female wanting to terminate a pregnancy while a man wants to keep it, this would be a good option. I think that something like that (transferring an already implanted egg grown into a fetus) would probably be at the extremes and much more difficult than a straight-forward IVF egg implanted in an "artificial womb" (i.e. ectogenesis). So very likely that the former (transfer of a pregnancy) would be DECADES farther down the line from ectogenesis. And there will be PLENTY of w… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 11:22 AM |
| 3 | What do you think of artificial wombs?I must say, I get a riotous, hilarious and total "shit kick" out of one of the quotations from feminazi types on this page where the very IDEA of an artificial womb is called (what else) "...an escalation of violence against women, a violence camouflaged by medical terms". They have used that "violence against women" so much that it has been fried permanently into their tiny little feminazi brains. But on THIS occasion... they will find that it won't work. (So they better get ready to slink off … | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 11:00 AM |
| 0 | Does it ever depress you when as a male some women often think it is ok to treat you poorly just because you are a guy?You are making a lot of assumptions. My friends are also not single. Well, maybe they are just as naive/ignorant as you are (Or maybe THEY are not so naive, and you are even MORE naive? Just because your friends are "attached" {or even married} does not mean they are NOT looking.) Many pubs in Australia are quite trendy with live music and full of young people. Yup, and the same in other countries. The keys there are "full of young people" (and therefore "empty of older people") -- which almost … | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 10:50 AM |
| 3 | What do you think of artificial wombs?They possibly wouldn't lead to psychologically healthy children. The fetus doesn't just draw nutrients from the mother during pregnacy, it interacts with her in different ways. Yeah, but also MINUS many of the health risks presented by human mothers: No more Fetal Alcohol Syndrome because "Mommy secretly drinks". Likewise with maternal smoking, and other drug addictions (including prescription medications). Similarly with a lot of infections that spread from mother to child (either during gestat… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 10:20 AM |
| 3 | What do you think of artificial wombs?the creepiness factor That "creepiness" factor was also present around the whole "in vitro" fertilization (test tube babies) before it became so pervasive. They'll probably never be as cheap as a surrogate Au contraire, they will probably be end up being significantly cheaper, so much cheaper that "surrogate" mothers will end up being an almost unheard of rarity. And the very existence of the "surrogate" mother market reveals that there IS a large potential market for "artificial wombs", and tec… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 10:15 AM |
| 2 | What do you think of artificial wombs?That's what people were saying about "test-tube babies" just a few decades back. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 10:02 AM |
| 4 | What do you think of artificial wombs?Feminazi are always laughing that "Well, men are really just sperm-donors, and child-payment providers, and will soon be obsolete and unnecessary... ha ha ha ha ha!" Whenever I hear that, I think of "artificial wombs" -- and if I am within talking range of the wimminazi's saying stuff like that, I talk about "artificial wombs"... And then when I have the opportunity, I elaborate that "In reality, it is WOMEN who are being ever-so-steadily made obsolete and unnecessary -- and that they are being … | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 10:00 AM |
| 1 | Does it ever depress you when as a male some women often think it is ok to treat you poorly just because you are a guy?I go to bars to hang out with friends, to relax after work, or it might be a pub or whatever, a bunch of people of different genders talking shit and relaxing after a week at work. Ummm, yeah... no you're not. If this is happening frequently then you are NOT just stopping at a local bar or corner pub (the kind populated by old farts & middle aged dudes, and with a picture "Dogs playing poker" on the wall) with some buds for the purposes of having a drink. YOU may think that that is what you are … | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 09:03 AM |
| 5 | Is it just me or is hiring a stripper / going to a strip club one of the saddest things ever?I really remember this one bachelor party -- we went to the nearby "big city" to a strip club, and... Lo and behold one of the strippers that came on stage about 15 minutes after we got there... Was a former classmate from High School (we were all mid 20's by then -- and yeah I know it sounds like a lame hollywood script, but this REALLY happened, and it gets even more cliche...) Because while THAT was kind of awkward enough (in varying degrees, it was funny, sad, weird, etc.) for all of us... W… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 06:32 AM |
| 2 | Is it just me or is hiring a stripper / going to a strip club one of the saddest things ever?Personally, I don't really see the point (as a "customer") of Hooters just doesn't do anything for me (I'm not a "boob" man) -- and regarding strippers -- the few times I've been in a strip joint, or seen a stripper, well I tend to just laugh at how seriously everyone is, to me it's all rather ridiculous and farcical. But, I don't find EITHER of them to be personally "shameful" -- and I think you are completely ignoring that there ARE a lot of "exhibitionist" (at least as far as their overall "b… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 06:10 AM |
| 2 | Is it just me or is hiring a stripper / going to a strip club one of the saddest things ever?I am delegating this whole stripper ordeal to another groomsman (ironically a gay friend of ours) Umm... as a precautionary note I hope you made certain you specified the GENDER of the stripper (just in case this friend has a REALLY strange sense of humor... cause that WOULD be too funny otherwise ... especially given all of your concern over the "poor girl" and all). ;-) | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 06:00 AM |
| 7 | Is it just me or is hiring a stripper / going to a strip club one of the saddest things ever?Skydiving- Damn proud of this idea. Dayum! Sounds like you have planned a whole "Bachelor's DAY" not just a night! And I'm choosing the "hire the stripper" option so it's subtly limited to just an hour out of the whole night. Not a bad idea -- the "strip club" option normally ends the night (not the least of which because some guys don't want to leave, AND because it normally becomes the "drunk lush" stage, so most of the "sober adult" attendees don't stay long, if they even stayed that long). B… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 05:43 AM |
| 17 | Is it just me or is hiring a stripper / going to a strip club one of the saddest things ever?Isn't hiring a stripper basically paying a girl who, under normal circumstances would never give you the time of day, hundreds of dollars to pretend you're funny and that she's into you? Depends on your perspective. You are hiring a "performer", or attending a "performance" a "show" -- the kind that (in our current society it is often considered a "tradition") to participate as an audience to a certain type of "entertainment act" -- not really all THAT different than hiring "BooBoo the Clown" or… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 05:18 AM |
| 3 | False Child Support Claim and Now My Tax Refund Is Stolen?This is why you should adjust your W4 so that you don't GET a "refund" but instead you need to pay in a bit at the end of the year. It's a LOT tougher for government agencies to confiscate funds when they don't already have possession of them. Oh... and you need to get an attorney. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/12 06:10 AM |
| 2 | Single Standard: Teacher, 39, jailed for 10 years after having sex with 15-year-old student in her carHowever, life situation often results in bad people looking less attractive. I'm specifically calling out meth use, but I imagine there are many other similar situations. I doubt those are thrown out of studies like that. Actually the studies I was talking about used pictures of an array of random individuals (none of whom had actually committed any crimes at all, and all of whom were relatively similarly dressed and photographed) and then did various "tests" on them with fake focus group "jurie… | /r/MensRights | 20/02/12 03:58 AM |
| 1 | How to Get Pregnant without Him KnowingYep, and if you ever have the urge for parenthood there are a lot of parentless kids out there waiting to be adopted. Yeah, there are... But good luck trying to adopt as a single male (it's basically impossible... the entire adoption industry is female-run, and VERY misandrous and the vast majority of "social workers" are single-mothers {put through college via government grants/support, in order to obtain a degree that is really only useful in obtaining a government job, with CPS, etc being one… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/12 08:32 PM |
| 2 | How to Get Pregnant without Him Knowingit's always better to adopt when they're infants to avoid having to care for a psychologically scarred kid. Alas, but that is a myth. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/12 08:20 PM |
| 2 | How to Get Pregnant without Him KnowingAnd... here are some of the results | /r/MensRights | 19/02/12 08:17 PM |
| 16 | Single Standard: Teacher, 39, jailed for 10 years after having sex with 15-year-old student in her carit seems like the few women who get longer sentences for stuff like this tend to be... well... uglier than the ones who get a slap on the wrist. This is not really that surprising. Studies have been done that show the phenomenon is true of ALL people being sentenced (i.e. across the board, the "beautiful people" tend to have much lower rates of conviction, AND to get much more lenient sentences when they do get convicted, meanwhile "ugly people" tend to get convicted faster & more frequently, as… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/12 08:08 PM |
| 1 | Men take note...Sorry, but synonym simply designates "closely associated words" -- not that they have identical meanings. | /r/MensRights | 04/01/12 03:54 AM |
| 1 | Feminists: demented, stunned or cultistsThen perhaps that (which is an entirely different thing) is what you should have written the first time around, rather than dancing around in qualifying-adverb-land. ;-) | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 01:01 PM |
| 0 | "Scientists have made a major breakthrough that could soon see human sperm grown in the laboratory."Sorry hun, but feminism seems to have the "bigoted hate movement" market cornered already. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 12:33 PM |
| -1 | Feminists: demented, stunned or cultistsI doubt that all feminists are nearly as extreme or man-hating as the author Well, WHEW! That is certainly reassuring; I mean so long as there are a FEW that aren't AS extreme or man-hating... just as long as the ALL aren't NEARLY that extreme, then there will be no problems. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 12:32 PM |
| 2 | "Scientists have made a major breakthrough that could soon see human sperm grown in the laboratory."But could that not be linked to the traditional rolemodels Yeah, as I already said if you want to delude yourself, you can claim anything and everything is due to "traditional role models." That's not reality though. women just not being interested in technology and engineering That "just not being interested" is what a predisposition is all about. instead of it being some inherent fallacy in females? Inherent "fallacy" ? The only "fallacy" that I talked about was this idiotic statement that men… | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 10:51 AM |
| 0 | "Scientists have made a major breakthrough that could soon see human sperm grown in the laboratory."And the donkey that impregnated the mare thought he was all that too! | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 08:44 AM |
| 3 | Men take note...She stated that she had an inclination and not skills. No she stated a desire, which could have many motivating factors, most of which do not qualify as an "inclination." | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 07:03 AM |
| 5 | Men take note...People often misunderstand the difference between ability and inclination. Yet inclination itself has prerequisites. To have the inclination, and be able of really gaining any mastery is not just a matter of desire, any more than ability can be gained via mere training; one must also have the capability, that is the underlying thinking processes such as spacial visualization, time-motion conceptualization, mental "mapping", and logical/analytical reasoning. While certainly not exclusive (nor aut… | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 07:03 AM |
| 1 | Why are American women so hateful towards women from other countries? Especially in the context of marriage, or a relationship?HA! Excellent and picturesque choice of wording. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 06:46 AM |
| 2 | Why are American women so hateful towards women from other countries? Especially in the context of marriage, or a relationship?I think (some) people make the subconscious assumption that if you are dating someone from outside your own ethnic group, it's because you think the opposite gender of your own ethnic group is not good enough. Or at least they think that's the only possible reason for it. This is inherently and simply a form of racism. It is not limited to simple racism though. I have seen phenomenon the OP cites in action with men who have married within the same race, but have brought in/back brides from "outs… | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 03:45 AM |
| 6 | Why are American women so hateful towards women from other countries? Especially in the context of marriage, or a relationship?i believe you meant "vitriol" in this context, the noun. Actually, since the "noun" is already present in the form of the word "response" earlier in the sentence, in this case the use of the adjective "vitriolic" is correct, and to use "vitriol" would be incorrect. It is a common mistake of poor writers (and failed grammar nazi's) to assume that an adjective must be adjacent to the noun that it addresses; it is a symptom of a writing style that is overly-simplistic. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 03:41 AM |
| 1 | "Scientists have made a major breakthrough that could soon see human sperm grown in the laboratory."You do realise that just because something is no longer "necessary" doesn't mean anything? We don't need men anymore, either THAT is a total and complete feminist fallacy. If men were not around... this entire civilization would quite literally end and begin reverting to the stone age within less than a month. And I am absolutely 100% serious about that. It is not "misogyny" it is simple reality. I have worked with a significant number of women, including a small number who were competent equals… | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 03:30 AM |
| 9 | Why are American women so hateful towards women from other countries? Especially in the context of marriage, or a relationship?Because the competition makes them look bad. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 02:02 AM |
| 0 | Feminists: demented, stunned or cultistsAll of the above? | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 02:00 AM |
| 1 | "Scientists have made a major breakthrough that could soon see human sperm grown in the laboratory."Oh, don't worry... very very soon the female of the species will be "obsoleted" (at least in terms of "necessity" for procreation). Countless millions upon millions of Chinese men will make it so. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 01:59 AM |
| 1 | "Scientists have made a major breakthrough that could soon see human sperm grown in the laboratory."I really think that a much more likely creation will be the artificial womb. Once that is perfected (almost certainly mainly by men), along with genetic control of the gender of the child, there will really no longer be any (procreative) need for females. And females will themselves push that along -- most feminists abhor the idea of pregnancy, to wit: Singer’s vision echoed that of feminist theorist Shulamith Firestone, who made a similar argument in 1970 in The Dialectic of Sex. Once the “free… | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 01:57 AM |
| 2 | "Scientists have made a major breakthrough that could soon see human sperm grown in the laboratory."Are you really trying to claim that some people have more of a right to breed Nature doesn't give a crap about "rights" -- it cares only about fitness to survive. A species which manages to become dependent upon "crutches" will eventually die as soon as those crutches prove to be inadequate. Perpetuating bad genetic combinations is just really, really dumb. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 01:52 AM |
| 3 | Wasting a Precious Resource: Our BoysIt’s easy to see how these attributes will be a liability in a few years. My four-year-old daughter was recently described by her preschool teacher as an ideal student: she listens, sits still, and follows directions. She is quiet, polite, and excels with fine motor skills, so she is enthralled by the many craft projects that dominate her preschool experience. Or, IOW... her daughter is the perfect little compliant drone, fully accepting her indoctrination. As Thomas summed it up: “[Students] ha… | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 01:49 AM |
| 1 | Wasting a Precious Resource: Our BoysHis take is that school was geared toward the learning style of boys for so long Really? | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 01:46 AM |
| 4 | Men take note...Women who are out fixing your car. You should fix them a sandwhich. These are so rare they are mythical. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 01:42 AM |
| 2 | An 18-year-old MAN who was hit and killed by a train in 2008 will be the subject of a present-day lawsuit after an appellate judge ruled that a WOMAN injured by his flying body parts may pursue a claim against his estate.Swap the genders in the story. Woman gets hit and killed by train, some of her body parts are flung and hit a man standing nearby; man sues woman's estate for "pain & suffering" damage... Are you seriously telling me that a judge would let THAT suit go forward? | /r/MensRights | 01/01/12 01:09 PM |
| 17 | "The stereotype of the 16-year-old boy is that he has sex on the brain. But a fascinating new report suggests that boys are motivated more by love and a desire to form real relationships with the girls they date."I remember in high school teachers would remark all the time on how the boys in the class just want to have sex Here's a question. How is that NOT a form of gender assault and sexual harassment? Oh... duh, because it's against males... so that makes it ok. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/12 01:10 AM |
| 1 | "The stereotype of the 16-year-old boy is that he has sex on the brain. But a fascinating new report suggests that boys are motivated more by love and a desire to form real relationships with the girls they date."I think you meant "attempting to" | /r/MensRights | 01/01/12 01:06 AM |
| 1 | Court Upholds Termination Of Soldier’s Parental Rights: Soldier/father is in Iraq. Wife has a boyfriend who harms his child. Father rushes home to care for his child. His parental rights are terminated anyway. His appeal is "without merit"Well, 5 out of 6 judges (who have a LOT more information about the entire situation than any of us do) apparently disagree with you. The fact that someone has managed to procreate does NOT mean they are some magically "ideal" parent. | /r/MensRights | 16/12/11 10:42 PM |
| 1 | Court Upholds Termination Of Soldier’s Parental Rights: Soldier/father is in Iraq. Wife has a boyfriend who harms his child. Father rushes home to care for his child. His parental rights are terminated anyway. His appeal is "without merit"Then couldn't the state have taken direct action to save the childs life without terminating the fathers parental rights? Certainly, and I am sure that they did (in the form of medical services, surgery, etc)... but "the state" doesn't exactly give you warm hugs, tuck you in at night, read you a book, perform home-care nursing services (which I am only speculating at, but given the child's extensive injuries I am betting the kid is going to need some close CARING detailed attention -- the kind t… | /r/MensRights | 16/12/11 07:06 AM |
| 3 | Court Upholds Termination Of Soldier’s Parental Rights: Soldier/father is in Iraq. Wife has a boyfriend who harms his child. Father rushes home to care for his child. His parental rights are terminated anyway. His appeal is "without merit"Because the child was taken by CPS and with the father being unavailable to care for the child, it was placed into foster care -- and these days some states "expedite" the termination of parents rights in order to speed up making kids available for adoption. Normally when a custodial parent is accused of abuse, then the other parent is present and able to file things in a timely manner to prevent the termination of their rights (and indeed to seek immediate custody of the child) ... but of cours… | /r/MensRights | 16/12/11 06:41 AM |
| -1 | [META] Let's have a more professional environment at r/MR. It is not acceptable for a moderator to engage in a pattern of personal attacks and censorship, harming the men's rights movementWell, that's ignatiusloyola's goal. Push away real MRAs so he can control the "dialogue". Well, he doesn't end up controlling the dialog -- he only eliminates it from taking place here (in this tiny little irrelevant portion of an insignificant corner of the internet). He may think he is a "big fish" in a small pond, but all he really ends up being is a guppy in a bowl. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/11 03:05 AM |
| 1 | [META] Let's have a more professional environment at r/MR. It is not acceptable for a moderator to engage in a pattern of personal attacks and censorship, harming the men's rights movementI also just tend to avoid the /r/MensRights/ subreddit (as I've no doubt many others do as well). | /r/MensRights | 09/12/11 01:06 AM |
| 0 | [META] Let's have a more professional environment at r/MR. It is not acceptable for a moderator to engage in a pattern of personal attacks and censorship, harming the men's rights movementI've observed your responses in the past (not only to myself -- which were extremely rude and insulting) but to many others. And there is a definite pattern, an ingrained behavior, which I think is unlikely to change. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/11 07:29 PM |
| 4 | [META] Let's have a more professional environment at r/MR. It is not acceptable for a moderator to engage in a pattern of personal attacks and censorship, harming the men's rights movementThe one strong point you have made is that I should not throw out casual insults against the userbase. Yet it is highly unlikely that you will stop. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/11 05:09 PM |
| 2 | Man ordered to pay wife for lack of sexThe couple, who are both 51, married in 1986 and have two children. They divorced in January 2009 in Nice. That alone should have been sufficient evidence to dismiss the case (unless she is admitting that the kids aren't his). Beyond that, she could have bought a vibrator and some batteries. (Because women don't really NEED a man, do they? That's what the feminists have claimed for decades now.) And is not dismiss it outright, the judge SHOULD then have reduced the "award" to an amount sufficien… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/11 04:45 PM |
| 2 | Petition to pardon computer pioneer Alan Turing startedAnd he was just such a blatant horrible criminal, right? What did he do again... In January 1952, Turing met Arnold Murray outside a cinema in Manchester. After a lunch date, Turing invited Murray to spend the weekend with him at his house, an invitation which Murray accepted although he did not show up. The pair met again in Manchester the following Monday, when Murray agreed to accompany Turing to the latter's house. A few weeks later Murray visited Turing's house again, and apparently spent t… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/11 04:34 PM |
| 2 | Jerry Sandusky denies child sex abuse charges and pedophilia. Could be an example of demonization of male affection toward children.That we know about. He certainly does not come off as any "hero" in any of this. | /r/MensRights | 18/11/11 02:34 AM |
| 1 | Jerry Sandusky denies child sex abuse charges and pedophilia. Could be an example of demonization of male affection toward children.I also find it hard to believe that anyone would see a child being abused in such a way and fail to take it to the police themselves. As I understand it, the guy was pretty young... and hoping for a career at Penn State (which he got) -- and this was one of the VIP coaches/former coaches. Add in that it was probably a totally UNexpected encounter (i.e. this is not some guy who works with a youth group and had been through leadership training as to what to do in such a case). How fucked up does s… | /r/MensRights | 18/11/11 02:33 AM |
| 2 | Jerry Sandusky denies child sex abuse charges and pedophilia. Could be an example of demonization of male affection toward children.I don't see anything inherently wrong with giving gifts to children If you are playing "Santa Claus" and giving gifts to 50 children in an orphanage... fine. Giving EXPENSIVE gifts to kids you are "working with" in a program like Scouts or Big Brothers -- a definite NO (if you are feeling sorry for an underprivileged kid, for example and you want to do something like get him a bicycle or something of that nature, you do it THROUGH the kid's parent(s) {i.e. you make certain it is OK with the pare… | /r/MensRights | 18/11/11 02:23 AM |
| 0 | Ron Paul: The truth about my student loan planYeah... justify your own ridiculously rude behavior... good job. Not. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/11 10:53 PM |
| 0 | Ron Paul: The truth about my student loan planWow, I mean really... just WOW. You went ballistic on me for what reason then? Seriously, look at the thread: I asked a question (though phrased as a statement)... And YOU immediately insulted me personally. Pretty sad. BTW, I support NOT allowing a forum to become yet another /r/politics/ -- but again, I think your stated reason for rejecting this post was poorly done. Good day. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/11 10:26 PM |
| 0 | Ron Paul: The truth about my student loan planYou miss the point. Feminism most definitely WAS (and IS) a "political" topic. I find it hilarious that you believe "Mens Rights" is somehow a-political in nature. And I felt you were implying that you were intending on "banning" me from the subreddit (not just encouraging me to post elsewhere). BTW, if you will have looked, you will note I have not posted ANY "political" things to MensRights subreddit. EDIT: And finally, I think you would be right to delete this particular post from the MR subr… | /r/MensRights | 30/10/11 05:09 AM |
| 1 | Ron Paul: The truth about my student loan planWow, are you really THAT much of of an ass? | /r/MensRights | 30/10/11 04:41 AM |
| 0 | Ron Paul: The truth about my student loan planI could say the same of you... though I would give an alternate view that you are an idiot/fool rather than a "douche" (I mean seriously... feminine hygiene products? Have you been totally emasculated and metrosexualized?) | /r/MensRights | 30/10/11 04:33 AM |
| -3 | Ron Paul: The truth about my student loan planAnd you think "Men's Rights" is a NON-political thing? ROTFLMAO. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/11 07:32 PM |
| 2 | Police warned about rising risk of false confessions - up to 20% of convicted criminals had confessed to crimes they didn't commit.Ahh yes, that is very true, but not always. Sometimes, in fact I would say probably most of the time with false rape accusations specifically Again, point taken. But the article linked to is NOT talking about false accusations nor is it talking about "rape". It is SPECIFICALLY talking about false confessions (to crime in general, everything from burglary to... well murder I suppose). | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 08:33 PM |
| 2 | Police warned about rising risk of false confessions - up to 20% of convicted criminals had confessed to crimes they didn't commit.In case you are serious, it is a much better outcome to allow an actual guilty person to walk free than to convict an innocent person. I am quite serious. And I would agree that I would far rather that a guilty man go free than an innocent man be locked up (which is really a SECOND crime in an of itself). I am merely pointing out that (because it seems to be so often forgotten) that as far as "preventing crime" goes, locking up an innocent man is utterly useless... because IF a crime has in fact… | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 08:12 PM |
| 1 | 'Chickens have come home to roost': some taxi drivers think twice about picking up young women because of false sex claimsThere at least needs to be a FINE. And some type of registry. | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 07:51 AM |
| 2 | 'Chickens have come home to roost': some taxi drivers think twice about picking up young women because of false sex claimsExcept you forgot the last part: Woman then takes purse and as the man turn around to leave she clocks him in the head from behind, knocking him out ... then she pulls her cell phone out of the purse and dials 911 ... so she can report being assaulted (and of course get a free ride home from the police). | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 07:49 AM |
| 2 | 'Chickens have come home to roost': some taxi drivers think twice about picking up young women because of false sex claimsThe pertinent section from the article: The chief problem seems to be young women and alcohol. "McCarthy said some young women are drunk and pass out on the way home. He said that when the driver wakes them up, they can't remember where they are going. In some cases, he said they threaten to make false accusations against the driver to avoid paying their fare. 'You touched me or you did this or that or you made a proposition,' said McCarthy, describing what drivers have reported being told." It … | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 07:46 AM |
| 2 | 'Chickens have come home to roost': some taxi drivers think twice about picking up young women because of false sex claimsThis is all women being judged for the actions of a few. Are the rest of them MUTE? Sorry, the entirety of the feminist agenda -- and the widespread support of it by the vast majority of women (and the silent "consent" of virtually all the rest) -- means it IS in fact the "chickens coming home to roost". Women could (and indeed SHOULD) be seeking to end the epidemic of false accusations... they aren't and thus the consequences are inevitable. | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 07:36 AM |
| 1 | 'Chickens have come home to roost': some taxi drivers think twice about picking up young women because of false sex claimsLiving in a rural area it is common practice that if someone's vehicle is on the side of the road to stop and ask if they need help... and I have frequently done so (normally it's an "out of gas" thing). But you know... the other day I saw a young woman alone with her car -- and I consciously, purposefully did NOT stop -- Why? Just not worth the risk (and besides, these days there is no excuse for her NOT to have a cell phone). Still... it makes me sad. | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 07:34 AM |
| 3 | Police warned about rising risk of false confessions - up to 20% of convicted criminals had confessed to crimes they didn't commit.One thing that NEEDS to be kept in mind here -- for every single person who is falsely convicted (whether via false/tricked confession or otherwise) -- it means that another REAL OFFENDER has gotten away with it, and it very likely still free (and quite possibly committing more crimes). | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 07:28 AM |
| 1 | Mother and daughter accused of molesting teen boy for three years, police say (NYDailyNews)I agree. | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 06:54 AM |
| 0 | Is MR really this dense?Shove it up your arse (provided there's any room next to your head). | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 06:49 AM |
| 0 | Is MR really this dense?Sorry, junior... sell your official talking point bullshit somewhere else. | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 06:21 AM |
| 5 | Rape culture for women by women. Head of battered women's shelter charged with prostituting women residentsAuthorities were also investigating if children who lived at the shelter -- some as young as 5 years old -- were forced into prostitution as well, Arturo Sandoval, spokesman for the state attorney general's office, told CNN. Yikes! | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 04:28 AM |
| 0 | Is MR really this dense?you're fucking retarded for saying that tidbit about the NY fed. And thus you demonstrate your own idiocy (i.e. you learned everything you know in Econ 101, and from other blase textbooks, etc -- knowing and learning nothing from the real world.) | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 02:42 AM |
| 1 | Is there any justification for women changing their name at marriage?? | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 12:27 AM |
| 0 | Is MR really this dense?riiiiiight. you really buy into that conspiracy theory stuff? What "conspiracy theory"? Lots of people got "sucked" into becoming supporter/puppets of the NYC financial masters via LBO's in the 1980's; that's simply a historical fact. As is the simple fact that all of the non-NY Federal Reserve Board positions are basically pointless/ineffective, and that they are handed out as feudal-style sinecures to "useful idiots" -- that's just the way the FR was structured; the NYC FRB is and always was t… | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 12:27 AM |
| 0 | Is MR really this dense?Where the heck do you think he got his money? He was awarded a huge amount in LBO-shenanigans in the late 1980's... then slid into one of the "swot-spot" non-jobs with the Federal Reserve in the early 1990's. He's been on easy street ever since, tapped occasionally as a token/puppet for various GOP-side stuff. | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 12:16 AM |
| 1 | Is there any justification for women changing their name at marriage?Actually, this strikes me as a great way to keep track of inbreeding. It would fail with anything but the most obscure family names. Names like Smith, Jones, Miller, etc were all "occupation" names and hence have nothing to do with one's ancestry. It would be even better if people's last names were the genetic disorder most likely to be present in a child. ??? WTF? "Genetic markers for disease" is at present in it's infancy, and recently it is making all kinds of unvalidated claims. | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 12:05 AM |
| 1 | Is MR really this dense?Paul has him on the audit issue, but Cain is dissembling and flat-out LYING -- and for the most part getting away with it (because in general our media does NOT investigate the claims of any of the puppet-corps). Cain is hardly a finanical industries puppet. if that were true they'd be filling his coffers and they aren't. Yes, he is. And if he survives into the primaries, they will... they will (personally I think they already have begun this, it just hasn't been revealed in the campaign finance… | /r/MensRights | 19/10/11 11:27 PM |
| 0 | Is MR really this dense?Cain is little more than (yet another) puppet/member of the financial industry. Cf His attitudes/dissemblance regarding the Federal Reserve Also, see this "head to head" video and tell me, would you hire Herb Cain as an "economic advisor"? And if not, why would you want him as President? | /r/MensRights | 19/10/11 11:10 PM |
| 3 | On PatriarchyIt's true that current societies are predominantly ruled by men. I'm sorry, but the emasculated creatures running most countries may be "males" but they are NOT "men". BTW, if you want to understand the REAL meaning/value and history of "patriarchy" (which actually "binds" both Men AND Women) I'd suggest you read "The Garbage Generation" by Daniel Amneus -- it was written back in 1990, and see for yourself how the predictions in it have begun coming true.) | /r/MensRights | 19/10/11 11:05 PM |
| 3 | Is there any justification for women changing their name at marriage?Because hyphenation get's a little "nutso" really fast. Smith-Jacobsen-Harper & Jones-Larson-Nelson Wedding The parents of Janie Smith-Jacobsen-Harper are pleased to announce her imminent wedding to David Lee Jones-Larson-Nelson. The couple intend to be known as the Smith-Jacobsen-Harper-Jones-Larson-Nelson/Jones-Larson-Nelson-Smith-Jacobsen-Harper's. May god have mercy upon their children (because they're gonna need it). | /r/MensRights | 19/10/11 10:59 PM |
| 9 | Women gets boys drunk and has sex with them - walks free from court.Court documents reveal she plied the boys, aged 12, 15, and two aged 14, with alcohol on three separate occasions. The first two involved one victim and the third, all four. Judge Sue Pullen wholly suspended O'Donnell's two-year, five-month sentence and placed her on an 18-month community-based order despite her previously breaching a similar order for an attempted robbery. Crime Victims Support Association president Noel McNamara said the sentence was a disgrace. "If it was a man on those charg… | /r/MensRights | 19/10/11 10:54 PM |
| 1 | Mother and daughter accused of molesting teen boy for three years, police say (NYDailyNews)My god men are sexually submissive. No, the "good ones" aren't. (Only those who are made this way via things like this -- this started when the kid {and he WAS a "kid"} was only 13 --and "horny" or not, he was molested... for years). Do you all like to have your mistresses take a shit on you too? BTW, would you say the same of "submissive" women who chase after "abusive" men? Apparently a lot of men do... and if the "process" of making them that way IS in fact the above (and I think in many, pro… | /r/MensRights | 19/10/11 10:50 PM |
| 6 | Mother and daughter accused of molesting teen boy for three years, police say (NYDailyNews)But everyone KNOWS that it is only MEN who "molest" -- women all have that "nuturing" thing, right? | /r/MensRights | 19/10/11 10:21 AM |
| 3 | "It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocateOriginal Guardian Story. A girl who claimed she was raped when she was a 15-year-old virgin was today convicted of attempting to pervert the course of justice by making a false allegation. The girl told police that a 14-year-old boy had raped her in his bedroom and she had been "too scared" to cry out to her friends. But after a three-day trial at a youth court in Cheltenham, a district judge decided the girl had had consensual sex with the boy and had lied to police and the court. The girl, who… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/11 07:22 AM |
| 1 | Putting men down, treating them as creepy pervs, mocking them in the media is a social barometer of how bad women feel about themselves. Men work more (job+housework), spend less, invent more, build more, risk more, do more. Women who feel worthless and insecure feel better seeing men denigrated.women dont like loser men Actually women LOVE "luzer" men... they're just not very good at recognizing which men are the REAL losers. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/11 03:37 PM |
| 1 | Putting men down, treating them as creepy pervs, mocking them in the media is a social barometer of how bad women feel about themselves. Men work more (job+housework), spend less, invent more, build more, risk more, do more. Women who feel worthless and insecure feel better seeing men denigrated.From a psychological frame I think the paranoia is a form of "guilt transference" by women. They have left their traditional roles as homemakers in order to "have it all" (careers, etc.) -- leaving their children -- and feeling conflicted about it... so they seek out a scapegoat. And quite conveniently, the standby scapegoat for all things feminist is: MEN. Add in the fact that shit-turds like John Walsh have built highly successful (and VERY lucrative) media careers out of spreading the phobia.… | /r/MensRights | 17/01/11 03:34 PM |
| 1 | Oakland County, Michigan: Police arrest father on sex assault charge, jail his wife, put kids in separate foster homes. Cop accuses and interrogates son with no adult present. Prosecutors admit zero evidence in case except forced statement given by autistic girl via facilitated communication.1) afaik, lawsuit payments came from police's insurance company. Doesn't matter... taxes will eventually be raised to pay the higher insurance fees necessary to recoup these. If anything the fact that it is paid by insurance makes it WORSE, because it means the cost is then being spread to other government units and other taxpayers. 2) The argument that government should never pay for abuse of society [snip] And who the heck ever made THAT argument? Not me. I was NOT arguing that the government … | /r/MensRights | 13/01/11 04:09 PM |
| 2 | Oakland County, Michigan: Police arrest father on sex assault charge, jail his wife, put kids in separate foster homes. Cop accuses and interrogates son with no adult present. Prosecutors admit zero evidence in case except forced statement given by autistic girl via facilitated communication.And in countless other situations, the police escalate situations and promote violence. To what end? So that they "win". That is their strategy. To win. They don't concern themselves with questions of whether the escalation in violence or risk was worth the "win". They will conduct car chases at high speed, putting numerous ordinary citizens at risk, in order to catch a criminal immediately. They will destroy property in order to "win". they will destroy families and especially fathers in order … | /r/MensRights | 13/01/11 01:46 PM |
| 1 | Oakland County, Michigan: Police arrest father on sex assault charge, jail his wife, put kids in separate foster homes. Cop accuses and interrogates son with no adult present. Prosecutors admit zero evidence in case except forced statement given by autistic girl via facilitated communication.The police are allowed to lie in interrogations. Not only are they allowed to lie... it is considered SOP to fabricate anything and everything, and to regularly give completely false assurances (note the repeated statements of "you have my word nothing will happen to you" to this kid) that assurance is an utter and total LIE (and misrepresented then as "my word" as if it were some type of binding oath, which is another lie) -- especially as what will "happen" is entirely NOT under the control of… | /r/MensRights | 13/01/11 01:37 PM |
| 1 | Oakland County, Michigan: Police arrest father on sex assault charge, jail his wife, put kids in separate foster homes. Cop accuses and interrogates son with no adult present. Prosecutors admit zero evidence in case except forced statement given by autistic girl via facilitated communication.The only way to stop it is to limit the police. File a Federal Civil Rights suit and DEMAND that the police and any other "officials" be charged under 18 USC 242 for false arrest, fabrication of evidence, and failure to keep from harm. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/11 01:29 PM |
| 2 | Oakland County, Michigan: Police arrest father on sex assault charge, jail his wife, put kids in separate foster homes. Cop accuses and interrogates son with no adult present. Prosecutors admit zero evidence in case except forced statement given by autistic girl via facilitated communication.The problem with the damages is that they are paid via taxes, and are NOT imposed on the individuals who actually COMMITTED the violations of rights (which in fact are "crimes"). The sad thing is that these things are virtually NEVER prosecuted under the "color of law" statute USC 18 242 -- which is what SHOULD occur in a case like this. At a minimum they violated the False Arrest, Fabrication of Evidence, and the "Failure to keep from harm" provisions. False arrest and fabrication of evidence: … | /r/MensRights | 13/01/11 01:18 PM |
| 1 | Forty Four Percent Of UK Men Afraid To Help Children because they might be seen as pedophilesost of the time when it happens, it's someone that the parents know and trust. Actually most of the time its the parents themselves. Secondarily it is someone the parents not only "trust" but someone they basically burden with their kids (while the parents are off doing God only knows what). And the SCARIEST thing -- the "kidnap" scenario -- is almost ALWAYS due to parental divorce/breakup (and it's one parent or the other doing the kidnapping -- the kid is basically just the "toy" being fought … | /r/MensRights | 04/08/10 09:05 PM |
| 1 | Forty Four Percent Of UK Men Afraid To Help Children because they might be seen as pedophilesThis really is a sad indictment, and probably completely accurate. We have developed a very strange, media led paranoia about this problem. I can personally vouch for it from my own anecdotal experience -- in the 90's (my late twenties and early thirties) I helped with a church youth group (I'd kind of been roped unwillingly into it*) -- and then I was made aware that because some of the kids had problems (totally UNrelated to anything with me -- the problems were with their families/siblings)..… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/10 09:01 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter