TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LacksBeard Archive

View 0 posts and 290 comments by LacksBeard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Ok, we just have that squared away. It's not about agreement or disagreement as I said, I don't care what you been through, its should be no more legal than me doing that to you. Even if i were to mot debate those numbers and grant them, yiur still switching “child maltreatment” to the narrower NIS-4 category of “abuse", my claim was that women perpetrate child maltreatment/abuse-and-neglect overall more often and NIS-4 actually supports that. The NIS-4 found that 68% of maltreated children were…
/r/MensRights17/08/26 08:24 PM
1

OK but what I'm saying is that hating men is misandry. Abortion is murder dummy, its not anything else, its no more a matter of agreement or disagreement then me saying your life isn't worth a damn and ending you. The proximity argument is BS and has been debunked, even when the amount of men and women numbers are controlled for women abuse more, for example in Juvie institutions. Not to mention it's a stupid qualification that you dont apply to men, men are around thier spouses more. I LOVE how…
/r/MensRights17/08/26 07:33 PM
1

Hatred for men is literally the definition of misandry, what's so hard to understand? It's not way higher actually when you look at non biased statistics and acknowledge that women often murder by proxy but if you want to play that game then women make men look like chumps by killing 50+ million babies every year IIRC, in the US alone, also women abuse children and elderly more then men do. You clearly didn't read his comment on your Maritime part.
/r/MensRights17/08/26 06:34 PM
1

You said "your projecting some type of hatred for men" which is misandry and I just listed the debunked talking points. That post is just saying the same things that's always been said when Lesbian DV is brought up, I already addressed the conclusion of that and many others have addressed these types. The dude you were talking to debunked it.
/r/MensRights16/08/26 02:53 AM
3

Boys being used for pragmatic things isn't patriarchal, especially since in the context of the Chinese it was to take care of parents, including women. Also, those women got those abortions of their own volition, what's easier for someone doesn't make it moral.
/r/MensRights11/08/26 10:56 AM
1

But I don't see how you can do that, I mean you can shave off termination but your not getting past the fact a growing mammal will pass.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 12:31 PM
1

Those procedures aren't the same as the others anymore then miscarriages are which are also abortions. Plus I'm sure stuff like ectopic isn't even considered abortion, things like that are triage situations, it's not really the same
/r/MensRights10/08/26 12:24 PM
0

You are
/r/MensRights10/08/26 12:10 PM
0

I said this. There's people and born children now who technically "don't have a chance" can we preform abortion procedures on them? And you said this. Women are allowed to do that. Why would it be a fantasy of mine when I clearly oppose it?
/r/MensRights10/08/26 12:07 PM
1

Except it doesn't in this case because no matter how you slice it, your getting rid of a mammal that's growing
/r/MensRights10/08/26 12:01 PM
1

It's called context clue Here's what you originally said "I will have an abortion if it's a boy" is still the best thing for the boy, with a mother like that.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 12:00 PM
3

Thank you, I swear MFs being deliberately obtuse
/r/MensRights10/08/26 11:47 AM
1

Women can stab, rip apart, or poison their born children? Since when?
/r/MensRights10/08/26 07:37 AM
1

Not according to me its the literal definition.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 07:35 AM
1

You just said to abort them.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 11:19 PM
0

No you can't, read the definition of arbitrary, its a personal preference that has no clear plan or rule or reasoning. There's no reasoning to say a sphere can be called a rectangle, all your doing taking the inception of a word and changing it, that's completely different from taking established things and then changing them. Same for abortion and termination. If its not termination then the baby wouldn't be dead.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 10:14 PM
1

Oh man, you right, my bad.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 10:09 PM
0

No they aren't. "The word arbitrary means based on a personal whim, random choice, or individual preference rather than any clear rule, plan, or reason" You can't call a sphere a rectangle.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 10:07 PM
0

You don't know what context clues are? I swear its like I'm talking to a feminists. If I say "so we should just kill people because of prolonged suffering" and you say "yeah and some would welcome it" and I say that we shouldn't oblige the whims of the mentally unstable, that clearly means what? Do you think my point is that ATLA is trash? Stop being deliberately obtuse, you wouldn't even want to live In a world where someone can kill another because of their suffering, not to mention how arbitr…
/r/MensRights09/08/26 10:02 PM
0

So you understand that what a mentally unstable person wants is not what should be done right? Your aware of this very basic principle?
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:47 PM
0

By definition its the same thing, your arbitrary distinction that's not supported in any medical literature has no bearing. If your going to use the definition of words then let's use them. "the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus" https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/abortion I'm 99% sure ectopic isn't considered abortion by definition, its more a triage situation if anything. By definition its the same th…
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:45 PM
7

"bY OtHeR wOmEN ThOUgh" I bet your completely fine with abortion but you only bitch about it solely when it comes to people saying that women shouldn't really be saying they'd abort the own sons just because of their gender. Sex specific abortion is actually one of the very few gripes that women can and should actively be protesting for violence against females but then that'd mean being against abortion which they support women should have for whatever reason and it also means they'd have to ho…
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:32 PM
7

Somehow still men's fault and for some reason it ceases to be ragebait when men do it. Why can't men who posts those videos just be responding the same way you suppose these feminists are doing? In just responding to what the other side said? Not to mention, even if this were the case, how come this excuse is never applied to dudes? Plus at least for the most part those men are talking about other grown women, these women are talking their OWN CHILDREN, yall always find a way to make women appea…
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:30 PM
1

Somehow still men's fault and for some reason it ceases to be ragebait when men do it. Why can't men who posts those videos just be responding the same way you suppose these feminists are doing? In just responding to what the other side said? Not to mention, even if this were the case, how come this excuse is never applied to dudes? Plus at least for the most part those men are talking about other grown men, these women are talking their OWN CHILDREN, yall always find a way to make women appear …
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:29 PM
10

Why is it always just ragebait when women do it?
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:22 PM
0

Abortion and termination are the same thing.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:22 PM
5

It's the same thing dummy, one just makes you feel icky for whatever arbitrary reason.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:20 PM
1

At least someone has some fucking sense here jeez
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:18 PM
-3

It's not the best anymore than me shooting you when you suffered for prolonged periods of time.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:18 PM
1

So I could come up to you in your time of suffering and put a bullet in your head because your suffering? Yall need to stop acting like yall care if your solution is to kill them.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:18 PM
6

It's not true, its completely vile to execute someone for something not in their control that they are suffering for.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:17 PM
-2

So anyone who's suffering should be executed for something they didn't do? OK bruh.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:16 PM
2

There's people and born children now who technically "don't have a chance" can we preform abortion procedures on them?
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:15 PM
3

"haha a free meal ticket? you guys complain about women outperforming men in college and in the workplace and then are somehow convinced that women of quality just want your money? if you go out on a dating app date, and she was just using you for a free meal that's because she sucks. not because all the datable (employed) women on earth are just trying to get free food. how is that logical?" Complete non sequitur, women doing that in jobs and college is a distinct issue from women feeling entit…
/r/MensRights08/08/26 05:16 AM
2

He is because hes a goober.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 05:08 AM
3

Don't really care about the war stuff but lesbian women have unusually high IPV victimization and that female-on-female IPV is a substantial component of it, the CDC absolutely supports that. In fact, the CDC's own 2013 press release says that approximately two thirds of lesbian IPV victims reported only female perpetrators, so that contradicts any attempt to explain the lesbian figure as simply lesbians being abused by men.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 05:07 AM
2

I'd have nothing of real value to say either if I thought raping of children was ok.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 04:37 AM
2

Why be civil to a child rape apologist? I hope your moved to a registry.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 04:35 AM
2

I don't know, that would mean we care about men and especially boys, you don't. This isn't a simple agree or disagree, logically you were proven wrong and statistically you were proven wrong, and in a sample of nearly 20k thousand people meanwhile the average study at best is only 1 thousand. Women rapimg men and especially boys is proven to be as bad as men raping girls. I don't wish good things on child rape apologist, id save a shitbulls life over yours any day.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 04:32 AM
2

Nah they just wouldn't care at that point.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 04:21 AM
2

"Well, I’m questioning your interpretation of the situation with your friend because he was your friend and you’re admittedly very involved in this situation, so you may be too emotionally invested to be able to step back and objectively assess the situation. Like if someone killed my friend for example, then I’m not going to have the same clarity when assessing the facts of what happened because my emotions are clouding my judgement. I wasn’t going to say that because I didn’t want to hurt your…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 04:10 AM
4

"A handful of those studies were interesting as they looked at specifically women having sex with underage boys. Those are the relevant ones here to this arguement. (I said a man having sex with a boy would be very traumatising already.)" Ok "So those studies where it was specifically boys and women had very small samples of boys interviewed (single digits). I’d bet that there’d be 10x that number of boys who it’s happened to just the same way as the study participants, but those majority of boy…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 03:55 AM
3

Okay so that shows that just because it's a rite of passage that it doesn't mean anything so moot point. Yeah people wouldn't care because little boys are and always have been the most oppressed group in any human demographic, there's not enough men that sees it for what it is, (evil) instead we got males like you and women literally just don't give a single shit, the only time they bring it up is to disparage and only to disparage men and no actual care for the victim. Your not sorry though, yo…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 03:49 AM
3

Your comment is missing but to respond to what I can see. A sick man is someone who justifies adults raping children. As for saying I ad hominem you "An ad hominem fallacy happens when someone attacks the character, motive, or traits of the person making an argument instead of addressing the real point of the argument itself. This Latin phrase translates to "against the man". It is a way to avoid a real debate by using insults or personal details that do not matter to the truth of the " I didn't…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 03:37 AM
4

As for the studies since you want to dodge them so bad here they are. "Studies comparing the physical effects of sexual assault on male and female victims Effects of Sexual Assaults on Men: Physical, Mental and Sexual Consequences "Most research suggests that the sexual assault of men is more likely to be violent, and accompanied by more and greater corollary injuries, than sexual assaults of women (however, also see Kimerling, Rellini, Kelly, Judson, & Learman, 2002; and McLean et al., 2005). H…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 03:34 AM
3

Except they literally do, MULTIPLE studies bruhz you literally just got them linked to you in another comment. That logic makes no sense, considering you didn't use statistics or logically demonstrate this, I could just as easily say that a lot of boys were shown to have suffered which they did if you actually looked at the multiple studies. OK so you ever heard of the semen warriors of Papa New Guinea? They'd rape boys under the guise of giving them strength as a rite of passage, so are all rit…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 03:33 AM
3

"Again, the ad hominens are a waste of time and pure mental masturbation and virtue signalling to get upvotes. I’m trying to have a debate with you." I didn't ad hom you by definition, the fallacious one is you. Virtue signaling and it's just me calling out absolutely wicked behavior, you literally admitted your hypothetical son was raped but you don't care much, how am I the one trying to look a certain way? I don't care if it was private DMs id still be saying the same things. "When a man is i…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 03:20 AM
4

"Why go at me with ad hominems like ‘clearly there’s something wrong with you’ — just debate rationally like a man would," An ad hom is when I use insults to respond to your arguments and treating that as if I actually argued my point, what I'm doing is insulting you and refuting your arguments, thats not the same. And what do you mean by rational? Don't use that word, you have no concept of abstraction, thats female behavior and not even good and proper ones, low level female behavior, like I s…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 03:14 AM
3

"I think probably because I see the act of men putting their penis into a woman as less invasive than a man putting his penis into a woman. " Oh ok so a man who rapes a boy by putting the boys penis in himself is not as bad? What about women raping little girls? "By your logic, I was ‘raped’ when I was 23 and I has fooling around with a lady and she grabbed my penis and put it in raw. Did I feel a bit weird about that? Kind of — I was worried about STDs. But once I was clean I just tell it as a …
/r/MensRights01/08/26 03:02 AM
3

Yes but is a boy the same as a man? Clearly not, not to mention there's some incredibly weak men out there and some very strong women, is a very weak man who's raped by another man rape to you? And if the woman isn't shocked and doesn't find it awful? As there have been cases where a woman was technically raped but didn't really feel anything about it? I mean all your doing is just making assertions your not actually demonstrating anything. I don't care what you think it's normal, you clearly ar…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 02:59 AM
3

I'm a man, but if I were a woman that wouldn't mean anything considering women and girls are sexually attracted to males very much, they aren't asexual, and girls sexually MATURE FASTER then boys. OK then drop the "lived experience" crap because it's not actually about whether a boy thinks it's ok it's wrong regardless of his feelings, this is the same logic you apply to a girl, now that thats squared away, why do you only apply that to girls and not boys? Your differences in strengyh argument i…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 02:51 AM
5

Oh OK so like girls who brag to other girls about their adult "boyfriends"? I'm the one that sounds like a woman? Your the one that sounds like a woman, you have absolutely no concept of the abstract and in the face of literal statistics that show little boys do suffer when grown women abuse them your response is "but my feelings", "but my lived experiences". That is categorically feminine behavior but of course I'm the one who is being that way, yeah aight folk.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 02:35 AM
5

"I didn’t delete any posts of mine from this thread." So post it again "Good example you have: so my first instinct with my 11 or 12 year old son would be to talk to him and ask him about why he’s sad and crying about this situation. I doubt he’s going to say, “I just felt so violated!” He’s prob crying because everyone told him he did something bad and the hysteria over it. Of course the woman who did it, should lose her job, because it crossed the professional boundary. But I don’t think she’d…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 02:30 AM
5

"8 years old is too young. I’m thinking back to when I was a male child, and probably around 11 or 12 is when I started being attracted to the women teachers at my school. That obviously accelerated when I was 13-14 in high school. " So a woman doing that to an 8 year old boy is wrong right? So what? Girls also have those feelings. "I’m basing this purely on my lived experience as a 12 year old boy and the lived experience of my friends. If I were to come out and say this has happened to me when…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 02:23 AM
2

You deleted your comment post it again. As for what I can see, thats not my point dummy, YOU made the hypothetical up and so I added to it to see how far your willing to take it. If your 11 to 12 year old son came to crying about a 10 out 10 woman raping him (as you admitted it was) would you or would you not extend that same level of passion you would your daughter if she got raped by a man? Matter a fact let's see how far you'll go, your son is crying and traumatized by it but your daughter is…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 02:19 AM
7

Why does that matter? Many rape victims not only don't but CANT fight back, some are drugged and tied up is it no longer as bad now? Does this logic apply to 8 year old boys who think sexually about their teachers?
/r/MensRights01/08/26 02:11 AM
5

"If you have a problem with people raping children, come at the Muslim community before you come at me. " Just because I have a problem with Muslims doing that doesn't mean I can't rebuke you too, especially since if we kept everything the same but the gender you wouldn't even care because your lower than a dog. "I’m saying that if a man raped a child (eg Mohammed and Aaisha) that would be far worse than if a woman had sex with a 12 year old boy. " Why is that far worse? In general I can see som…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 02:06 AM
2

Except you didn't demonstrate why what your saying is true at all.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 01:47 AM
2

Aight bru, like I said, your saying nothing
/r/MensRights01/08/26 01:45 AM
3

You can't even demonstrate why your complaints are valid vs someone else's, your the one saying nothing.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 01:41 AM
2

Alright bruh, your just saying nothing at this point.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 01:40 AM
3

Yes really otherwise why is your complaints valid but others aren't?
/r/MensRights01/08/26 01:38 AM
3

And I said. "So the same can be said for you in the vast majority of issues your tragedies you oppose right?"
/r/MensRights01/08/26 01:32 AM
5

Oh okay the same way little girls don't show overt trauma when they get "seduced" by an older man?
/r/MensRights01/08/26 01:31 AM
0

Scumbag is to kind, dude is lower a dog in my book and I say that as someone who hates pet culture.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 01:30 AM
4

Honest about what? When the other dude came at you with statistics you didn't logically demonstrate anything, when another person at length logically demonstrated your wickedness as just that you didn't even respond. You say it's far worse if the genders are reversed and then you tell others about virtue signaling? Virtue signaling about what exactly? Oh so I guess it's an echo chamber as well when people in reddit threads by the thousands say how much a man is a monster for doing things to a li…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 01:28 AM
2

"I’m also incredibly frustrated by how some, but certainly not all, feminists point to isolated cases of a sick male and try to use it as evidence of a societal conspiracy against women. If I did the same thing over a case of a sick woman, I’d probably choke to death on the irony." Anecdotes and "isolated" cases can found for just about anything, that's why we have stats so this is a moot point, your just whining bruh.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 01:22 AM
3

And that starts in this context by acknowledging that a female was raping little boys, children being raped is never a nothing case what are you talking about?
/r/MensRights01/08/26 01:20 AM
4

So the same can be said for you in the vast majority of issues your tragedies you oppose right? Also ignoring the fact he's just ok with child rape.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 01:18 AM
1

If women can't even prey on people who are not even 4 years from being single digits how the hell do you think they can be predators in any other case? I hope your trolling bruh otherwise you deserve to lose your livelihood and put on a list.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 01:17 AM
6

And women are just radio silent or are saying things that are to this affect
/r/MensRights01/08/26 01:15 AM
1

So Women are acting crazy, mentally, emotionally, and physically abusing men and children and still Women most affected, smh.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 12:03 AM
1

Someone didn't read the studies
/r/MensRights10/07/26 11:42 PM
1

The proximity argument is bunk and has been debunked, even when the amount of men and women numbers are controlled for women abuse more Not to mention it's a stupid qualification that you dont apply to men, men are around thier spouses more.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 11:39 PM
1

Also. https://www.tmz.com/2011/08/10/camille-grammer-kelsey-grammer-small-penis-video-real-housewives-of-beverly-hills/
/r/MensRights10/07/26 08:10 PM
1

"Nah, I’m just not an incel that hates women but obsesses over them at the same time." Nah you clearly are a dumbass, your genuinely almost on the level of a guy I once seen who said that washing your body with a singular bar of soap cleans you because it cleans dishes that way. It's been a while since someone made me set my phone to the side and contemplate what's NOT going through their head. "Also, that’s a lot of words to just say you haven’t ever actually seen, heard, or experienced any wom…
/r/MensRights10/07/26 08:08 PM
3

"“Why do I need to experience or see a thing to ‘notice’ it?” 🤦🏻‍♂️ Because that’s how human sensation works, if you don’t experience / see something happen then you are just assuming / speculating that it happens. That’s the crux of my entire point. You are asserting that “women” do this terrible thing to men, but you can’t name a single instance of it happening in your actual life that you’ve ever seen or experienced. At best it’s gossip, at worst it’s libel. You are perpetuating a negative tr…
/r/MensRights10/07/26 07:54 PM
3

"I said that making a woman cum through mind blowing sex being the most important quality of a man only happens in porn and I said most women don’t cum from PIV. Those two things are in no way contradictory. Certainly there are “some” humans that do ‘anything you can come up with an example of’ so there are ‘some’ women that shame men for having a small penis and there are ‘some’ women fly into space and there are ‘some’ women that murder their own children and there are ‘some’ women that… fill …
/r/MensRights10/07/26 07:08 PM
1

First off, I don't have kids and the kids and babies that would need care like that already have a mom and a dad and most moms are SAHMs and I have a big circle of family and elderly so nobody needs to hire a baby sitter. On the logic tho that makes no sense, I can't be for or against something just because you think I MAY not put my money where my mouth is? By that logic most people shouldn't be for or against many evil or even good things. Your against rape amd child exploitation? Well what ha…
/r/MensRights08/07/26 09:35 PM
3

"That only happens in porn, not real life" "Most women don't cum from PIV" As in some do so you just contradicted yourself, also your other comments are stupid especially if you think women don't shame men for having small a penis.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 09:26 PM
1

Towards men
/r/MensRights02/07/26 09:55 PM
1

Again, you haven’t answered my question. We know there are female abusers aplenty. Then why do people prefer female caretakers to their male counterparts ? Sexism, it's pretty obvious
/r/MensRights30/06/26 03:33 PM
1

Stop acting like there's not a genuine issue between men and women in the west.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 03:32 PM
1

Nah, it's still women that abuse children AT LEAST as equal to men. I just made multiple comments about this very thing actually.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 03:30 PM
1

First off, nice chatgpt, can't do your own research or use your own logic? Anyway. Your response still doesn't actually refute my point about male victimization, you just changes the subject. I cited CDC data showing that when men are victims of sexual violence, women are responsible for a very large majority share of certain categories, especially "made to penetrate," sexual coercion, stalking, and intimate partner violence. Yet your reply reply then switches to discussing the percentage of all…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 11:24 PM
1

Telling me to use my brain but your arguments in the other thread is a big ol appeal to nature fallacy lol. From CDC. 87% of male victims of (completed or attempted) rape reported only male perpetrators. 79% of male victims of being made to penetrate reported only female perpetrators. 82% of male victims of sexual coercion reported only female perpetrators. 53% of male victims of unwanted sexual contact reported only female perpetrators. 48% of male victims of lifetime non-contact unwanted sexua…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 03:33 AM
1

Notice how you didn't actually refute it tho? And how did i pull it out my ass and yet you just listed where it potentially came from? Use your head.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 03:13 AM
1

This logic was essentially refuted in my other comment
/r/MensRights17/06/26 03:04 AM
1

You example doesn't rebut my point, because your conflating generalization itself with false, rigid stereotyping. Humans generalize constantly because it's how language and reasoning work. If I say "children are more vulnerable than adults," "men are taller on average than women," or "elderly people are more likely to have health problems," I'm making generalizations based on group-level patterns. Without them, we'd be unable to discuss demographics, public health, criminology, psychology, or so…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 03:03 AM
1

Because if I say people of a group often does a thing more than others someone will say, "but i know someone of that group that doesn't do that" and I can just say the same thing in reverse on how someone of that group did the thing.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 02:41 AM
1

People have conversations about all types of things doesn't mean it's going anywhere. And it doesn't make a stronger point, it'd basically be a loop until someone starts generalizing
/r/MensRights17/06/26 02:32 AM
1

Because no conversation would go anywhere if people could just say "but I know someone who doesn't do that" or things of that nature
/r/MensRights17/06/26 02:26 AM
1

My original bit was women-only buses due to male harassment on buses so thats a public transportation scenario justified primarily by safety concerns. If someone supports women-only buses because of concerns about harassment, the relevant principle is not bodily privacy when it's clear in your view that segregation can be justified when one group poses a sufficiently elevated risk to another group in a public space. Once that isnon the table, it becomes fair to ask where its limits are. If the r…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 02:25 AM
2

No it wasn't obvious until a few comments ago, idk why you have to rewrite history, everyone can see the comments. I refuted it well enough you essentially say the exact same thing, I'd say that's a good refutation or your slop logic all things considered. But whatever you need to feel better about yourself ig.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 07:00 PM
1

Your answer was nonexistent up until a few comments ago, and apparently it's so basic yet you still couldn't preform, until a few comments ago. All your doing is essentially regurgitating the exact "logic" I literally just refuted so unless your brain can cook something else that's not regurgitation this conversation is over.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 06:54 PM
2

As if these supposed "context clues" aren't just you obfuscating but sure, I'm the one with the comprehension problem after I had to hold your hand for you to finally answer the question. I already addressed this shoddy "logic" briefly but I'll go further as your basically trying to dismiss the comparison by waving it away as “everything is different so nothing can be compared" (which is the logical framework of your "logic") and yet by this "logic" nobody could compare anything. The question is…
/r/MensRights09/06/26 06:48 PM
2

Thank you for finally answering the dang question. It's braindead yet you pussyfoot around it so hard, also that's another baseless assertion. If you wouldn't for them then by your own admission, logically, you shouldn't for women either. I really don't care about this conversation that much though, I just wanted you to stop pussyfooting.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 06:37 PM
3

And this matters in regards to his question because? All your doing is obfuscating from the question. Should there be segregation based on race because some races may or may not commit more violent crime? Everything else you said is essentially irrelevant to that question especially considering there's next to no 1:1 parallels with humans to begin with.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 06:32 PM
3

You didn't explain shit, like this new comment, your previous one where you apparently "explained" it away was you just making a baseless assertion and a asking a question which doesn't fly considering he asked you a question first. The common denominator is immutable characteristics so stop being a wuss.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 06:23 PM
-1

The same reason everyone ever makes generalizations?
/r/MensRights09/06/26 06:19 PM
1

If they get no help and no support then how are the awful women being held accountable? Also if you blocked that other guy your a wuss.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 06:18 PM
3

That's just a pussyfoot way of obfusactating out of addressing his question, both are immutable characteristics. He nor anyone should have to answer that question when you didn't address his.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 06:15 PM
2

Blatantly not true, actual non biased statistics or statistics with suspect methodology have at least around equal.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 05:42 PM
1

Also nice chat bot
/r/MensRights09/06/26 05:22 PM
1

Have you been paying attention to anything? ANYTHING boy related is "critiqued".
/r/MensRights09/06/26 05:21 PM
1

Nice chatbot folk
/r/MensRights09/06/26 05:15 PM
8

Honestly a thing that happens in general, people are just fine with positive comments but if one is not pure praise that person is just a hater or something. A piece of wet toilet paper is 1000x stronger than a lot of people backbone nowadays
/r/MensRights09/06/26 04:59 PM
4

You need to consume more media if you think PunPun is unmatched, especially in regards to men's issues, it's above average.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 11:34 PM
0

No, something women say to men all the time, it's just another version of "who hurt you?" In this context.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 11:28 AM
2

You did if after presented with an argument you resort to such a feminine response in this context.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 02:15 AM
2

I think it worked better for some, worse for others. I don’t think there’s a biological backing for not allowing women to have bank accounts. No system is perfect but some are clearly better than others. The bank account part is a non sequitur, saying there’s no biological reason for restricting women from bank accounts doesn’t contradict the existence of biological influences on gender roles. Biology can inform general tendencies,like differences in average physical strength, reproductive inves…
/r/MensRights19/03/26 01:32 AM
2

Is it an opinion if it worked better than any other system and there's a biological backing for it vs other systems? And there was a contract, a social one. Do you think morality is subjective.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 01:12 AM
4

Old gender roles worked, the contract has been broken.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 12:21 AM
2

I'm better than pro life, I'm an abolitionist. And don't even think to talk to me about valuing life when you think women should be free to abort (murder) babies by poisoning them or ripping them, or cutting their limbs off while alive. If you really cared about women you'd know and be in opposition to abortion considering the evidence that most sex select abort happens of baby girls.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 11:47 PM
3

You don't know who I voted for and being lonely has nothing to do with whether matriarchies are better than patriarchy, which they arent.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 11:31 PM
1

There is no proof. Oh ok, I guess nature gave you your technological device, your house, your toilet, car etc, I'm sure i can just find one absent humans right? Men didn't steal from women because women by and large don't invent like men amd they still don't and I hope you realize that marginalized groups include men too.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 11:20 PM
2

I didn't see that, anyway, it's still a no that there's successful matriarchies anywhere at any time and there's no evidence to think it's better than patriarchy that gives you all the conveniences you love.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 11:09 PM
2

You mean native Americans? They aren't matriarchal bro
/r/MensRights18/03/26 11:00 PM
3

Not even advanced, just successful, as for the rest, I can't see your comment
/r/MensRights18/03/26 10:44 PM
2

Can't believe this crap has a single upvote. And a matriarchal society would be trash, there's a reason there's not one advanced matriarchal society. As for the rest, first off the idea that civilizations like the Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, and Aztecs “failed because of patriarchy” is way too simplistic to be taken seriously at all. Those societies lasted hundreds to thousands of years amd the Fall of the Western Roman Empire, for example, wasn’t caused by “men in charge" it was a mix of economi…
/r/MensRights18/03/26 10:14 PM
2

What are you talking about? Newsflash but you can find an outlier in almost all cases of anything but said outliers prove the rule, you wouldn't even be talking this way if women were as strong as men on average. It's just a fact that women are physically way weaker then men and what characteristics are constructed? Only women can get pregnant and only dudes can have a penis and are behavior and why we have some systems we do nowadays are from our biology. Extended family thing I agree with but …
/r/MensRights18/03/26 09:59 PM
0

The only decent all women sub is r/vindictaratecelebs
/r/MensRights28/01/26 12:08 PM
2

No, you get blocked for doing things like denying that rape and abuse happened. You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't get into with reason. Never once denied that and right back at you. You then spam responded to a bunch of linked sources with zero counter sources all within a few minutes of each other proving you didn't read any of the sources at all. They were fine counters and I've already been had most of the things I link in these type of discussions because you feminist al…
/r/MensRights27/01/26 06:36 AM
1

Classic internet Rome take, a mash-up of half-truths, legal anachronism, and modern ideology projected backwards onto a civilization that operated on a completely different social logic. Let’s start with the biggest falsehood: “women were the legal property of their husbands.” That is not Roman law and that description fits only one early and increasingly rare form of marriage, manus marriage. By the late Republic and throughout the Empire, the dominant form was sine manu marriage, in which a wo…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:47 AM
1

The claims in those sources by the way you framed them particularly around hysteria and lobotomies, are misleading. The term “hysteria” in early psychiatry but it was a catch-all diagnosis that could include anxiety, depression, epilepsy, or neurological disorders, and while it was disproportionately applied to women, it was not universally used to justify forced lobotomies or institutionalization for “defiance of husbands” or sexual behavior. Most women labeled with hysteria were receiving trea…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:14 AM
5

The best feminist tool is to put what someone said in a short version with quotations because there's nothing they can actually say against the actual claim. I'm gonna go ahead and refute your other stuff right quick. Edit: lol now I know the reason nobody is responding to your nonsense, you do nothing but block people before you amd your claims can get cooked to much
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:08 AM
2

I don't get it, these women are financially independent way before 50 years ago, what's with the goalpost shift? I could refutes this anyway though, but maybe later.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:02 AM
1

Women did work in agrarian societies, but not equally in type, volume, or social recognition compared to men. In most pre-industrial agrarian societies, labor was highly gendered. Men did heavy fieldwork, ploughing, animal husbandry, constructing buildings, managing forests, and hunting and so this work required raw physical strength and was central to food production and survival. Women typically handled domestic agriculture, such as gardening, weeding, milking, collecting eggs, food processing…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:01 AM
2

“Roman women couldn’t live without men, had no education, couldn’t participate in society that’s the literal definition of oppression.” Is your stance right? Well it's bogus. First off, Roman women were citizens with legal status and agency in many areas, not mere extensions of men. They did have limitations compared to men (no voting, no public office), but they still exercised real autonomy in areas that also mattered. They could own, inherit, manage, and dispose of property independently in m…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 06:53 AM
2

Over 200 million women worldwide have had their genitalia cut off. Now it'd be a problem in feminist circles if i said "but by other women" now would it?
/r/MensRights26/01/26 06:45 AM
2

When people say "women were not oppressed for centuries" what we mean is that there wasn't a holistic agreement by men to subjugate women just for being women, ESPECIALLY when 8/10 the same grievances can apply to men and not solely women.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 06:43 AM
3

First, coverture did not make women property, that is a blatant lie. Married women were legally dependent on their husbands in some ways, yes, but they were never chattel. They could own dowries, inherit land, and in practice, they ran households, farms, businesses, and even estates, often holding far more power than you acknowledges. The idea that widows “returned to their fathers’ control” is laughably fals as widows often became legally and financially independent, sometimes commanding more a…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 06:41 AM
3

Bro-man, link me that comment, id be more than happy to refute that.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 10:45 AM
6

Believe me, as a Black man, we are definitely facing issues too, whether it's leftist wolves in sheep's clothes or our own women spitting out sheer venom. Just look up divestment black women.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 10:43 AM
5

"True feminism" pushes for nothing but the elevation of women at the expense of men and boys, what your talking about is basic decency, not feminism nonsense. And since when did patriarchy push this idea? (also nice victim blaming btw) drop the feminist idea of patriarchy and look at what it actually is and what it produces, aka, the bedrock of civilization.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 05:45 PM
4

He's not angry at all women, just feminists women and in such, it is a valid name to call. If misandry exist because of misogyny then where did misogyny come from?
/r/MensRights23/12/25 05:43 PM
0

And what ways are those?
/r/MensRights15/12/25 06:22 AM
0

Islam is crap but Christianity is the answer to really everything, and come off it what's so bad with the "slavery" of telling people not to murder and it actually has a reason outside of "Muh preferences"? Yall can act like brow-beaten sissies sometimes I swear.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 06:21 AM
1

Saying gender roles are BS makes you as bad and as annoying as feminist or very close to it.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 06:20 AM
1

Also, assuming your nor going to give me a cope answer like "it's so stupid I'm not going to respond", feel free to respond to me exposing how under your worldview of men being natural predators of women would actually make women more blame-worthy then men, along with victim blaming women indirectly. Again, of course assuming your not going to cope your way out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 01:16 AM
1

Yes they were if they had a baby to feed every 2-3 hours with their boobs they wouldn’t have been doing all that. Complete nonsense, no they were not. If a woman was breastfeeding every 2 to 3 hours, that still does not REMOTELY compare to the constant, high-risk labor and mortality men faced in pre-modern and Paleolithic societies, men were essentially on call for life-or-death tasks every single day. They hunted dangerous megafauna, traveled long distances to procure raw materials for tools, d…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 01:13 AM
1

And yes men shouldn’t get special credit you didn’t say women were sacrificing their bodies having babies and men were inventing and building. You want to prop up men like they were doing more Again, the argument falls apart the moment anyone actually looks at the historical record instead of vibes or whatever. The claim that “men and women died at similar rates” is simply not true across ANY pre-modern population with actual demographic data, instead every anthropological dataset we have, from …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 01:13 AM
1

Again what does that prove? We simply don’t know because historically women’s contributions were not recorded as much. But what we do know is men weren’t inventing and building while birthing and nursing multiple children back to back. That we know for sure. What do you mean what does this prove? You asked me how I knew most inventions were made by men and I told you one of the ways. That's irrelevant of they were recorded or not, this same standard applies to men, every useful and convenient te…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 01:13 AM
1

You claimed that men are protectors of women against wild animals. I responded by pointing out the wild animals are far less likely to be a real threat to women than men are. Since I never claimed that women were protectors of men I have no idea why you bring that up in response. Nevertheless men actually kill men at a much higher rate than wild animals or women kill men. Hell men kill men more than they kill women. As for children it’s actually about 50:50 women don’t kill children more than me…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 12:54 AM
4

I had a debate about conscription not to long ago and never thought about it like that, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 02:47 AM
3

Choose the right one
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 02:45 AM
1

No idea how you’re calculating the figures regardless men weren’t birthing and nursing babies while inventing so again no comparison to be made with women. It's called the internet and the fact that mostly everything you use can be traced back to being made by a man, a comparison can be made and has been made multiple times, that's why your running to this excuse but then later you'll say that women were doing both. If either sex “disappeared” the human race would be gone—assuming we had zero sp…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 02:15 AM
1

Considering you actually thought that men are literally natural predators of women tells me and anyone that anything you have to say short of the sky being blue is a factually incorrect take, it's also dumb, people in general are around people more, not animals so it's a false equivalent. More men are killed by women than animals too, especially if we include little boys. If men are natural predators than women also share literally half the blame because then why are women enabling future predat…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 01:57 AM
1

Oh is that so? Yes. Huh? I think it’s funny how people really believe humans were the main prey of bears and lions. Humans don’t have a lot of predators in the wild humans were dying from bug bites and snake bites way more than bear attacks. The main ones men protect women from are OTHER MEN. 🙄 Women’s natural predator is literally a man. Nowadays? Sure, we aren't a food source, back then? Your flat put wrong. The idea that “humans barely had predators, it was mostly bug bites and snake bites lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 04:12 AM
1

Yeah and there's women who are working hardcore blue collar jobs, that doesn't defeat the fact the vast majority of inventors and people working those jobs are men, with things like that they are always at least 79% men. Most inventors are men and most useful inventions are made by men. Not really we could theoretically sustain a human population with IVF 😂 IVF isn’t scalable like sci-fi cloning chambers. It’s invasive, extraordinarily resource-heavy, and horrifyingly INEFFICIENT compared to nor…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 04:12 AM
1

And seriously, your formatting is trash, make it easier for both of us and format even a little better.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 12:13 AM
1

Before i refute you, i just want to say your formatting sucks. How do you know this? Because we can look it up. Not that it matters anyways because men weren’t inventing and building while birthing and nursing children. So again there is no comparison. If men weren’t building and inventing it was to make themselves useful because they had more free time compared to women You act like father's weren’t taking care of their children too, and if the concept of men as a whole having "free time" matte…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 12:12 AM
1

What does that mean? You know everything ever invented? Also a lot of people attributed with inventing something didn’t even invent said thing by themselves. History sells us a narrative it doesn’t necessarily tell the complete truth. What do you think it means? I know that most of the things that benefit us globally came from men, yeah they had other men working with them. History sells a narrative until it's time to paint women as victims, then it's all true. Birthing and caring for kids doesn…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 11:03 PM
5

I think the overall point is that feminists will project their narratives in to just about anything
/r/MensRights24/11/25 04:27 AM
29

I always ask that if thier son was accused of SA would they instantly side with his accuser.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 04:25 AM
5

I genuinely thought it was a skit or something fake until I saw the police report.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 04:23 AM
1

Women did create and invent there are many women in history who created and invented things. Most not as prolific or valuable as what men created and thought of. Um you just implied that this reproductive labor isn’t very important and that men are “better” because they were doing philosophy and math. So which is it? See the reality is women CAN do math and philosophy yet men can’t gestate and nurse babies so women are more foundational to any type of society remaining in existence. A society wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 04:20 AM
1

Oh so you need men lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 04:15 AM
1

Yeah it does matter about your stance on abortion. Its where you draw the line between foetus and baby. I think a lot of countries have a good definition of being the point of viability. Once a baby is viable to be born and likely to survive outside the mother, there is no justification for killing it. It's always been a baby, what do you think fetus means? Go ahead and copy paste the definition of the word fetus and offspring. There's no justification to begin with. Its wild that they even ackn…
/r/MensRights18/11/25 12:35 PM
1

Oh, well, I think he meant human made issues.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 04:11 PM
1

TB?
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:17 PM
1

This actually strengthens the pro life or the better side of abolitionist. The fact that your body naturally incorporated your twin isn’t framed as “you killed your brother.” It’s a biological event that happens WITHOUT intention, without agency, without any moral capacity behind it. Nature causing death has never been considered morally equivalent to a person causing death. If a lightning strike kills someone, no courtroom opens the next morning. If a parent intentionally drowns someone in the …
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:16 PM
0

Terrible method, not to long ago slavery was legal and in some places still is, is slavery now ok?
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:09 PM
1

Yes it is
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:08 PM
0

Yeah, abortion is probably the biggest collective evil of all time, i say probably only because I dont know what happened when the Earth was flooded by God.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:08 PM
1

Why
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:07 PM
2

Stance doesn't matter, its is murder
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:06 PM
0

Likely? Idk but women do in fact murder more than men. It's called abortion.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:06 PM
1

None of this should then allow prison abolishing or people to support it.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 09:36 AM
1

I wouldn't say that, especially of we count animation. Master Splinter, I'm pretty sure Superman was a dad in a show, Mae Hughes, Atticus Finch, Ned Stark, Phillip Banks. When it comes to things like this I don't think there's a single greatest dad or mom, of course some are better than others but anyone who had a good dad thinks theirs is the best despite the dad's obviously being different people in most regards. Edit: a movie series and not TV i know but let's not forget Gomez Addams. Edit 2:…
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:21 AM
1

If a man is not stronger than he has some issues
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:15 AM
2

What European countries like Sweden? A low and homogeneous population? Calling prison madness and injustice but offering absolutely NOTHING to victims smh.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:10 AM
0

The criminals should live in your house and be your neighbors then. Edit: cornball blocked me must be
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:09 AM
2

When someone commits a crime, they have used their freedom to violate the rights of others. Morally, that choice carries weight. Deserving punishment isn’t about cruelty, it’s about justice proportional to the act. If a person steals from someone, it’s not justifiable for society to shrug and say, “Oh, they don’t need consequences because punishment is unpleasant.” The victim’s rights, the trust in the community, and the natural expectation of fairness demand a response. Punishment acknowledges …
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:09 AM
3

Nah, it's pretty widely known they don't care as much as dudes
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:03 AM
-5

How do you know you have a better sex life than straight couples and why does it have to be specifically be straight couples? Ive seen many homosexual relationships where they say they dont like having sex with thier boyfriend or girlfriend. What Devil Fruit gave you that power? Anyway, I don't really know, I think you can definitely make this argument but go to any source of a female teacher raping a child and you'll see the infamous "wish it were me" comment by the thousands, where I know they…
/r/MensRights03/11/25 04:51 AM
6

Well those 60 percent must also genuinely hate men too because who say such things and not have any negativity towards that demographic.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 04:44 AM
3

I said you could be lying. Dude, the point is is that women don't go into those extensively laborious jobs of their own choice. It's not a sweeping generalization, all of those jobs at the very very least at least are 80% men, so it's not cognitive distortion it's a fact.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 10:21 PM
56

First off, nobody here knows your feeling the truth, you could be lying your rear off second off, even if that were true have you ever heard of the concept of an "OUTLIER"? Nobody said women don't exist in them but women for dang sure aren't going in drives for them either despite having all the ability to do so, nice try tho.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 08:06 AM
1

A yes it’s so nice to have all your decisions made for you and have generally no autonomy "Women made an awful decision with feminism lol they had the easiest life imaginable, no financial stress and no 9 to 5... Sign me up lol Also equality is impossible because men and women are not equal, no matter how hard we will it. The only time women keep up is when we change the rules to accommodate it. So no, equality can't happen." Where did you possibly get the idea that this person wants other thing…
/r/MensRights26/10/25 02:45 AM
1

In the LGBTQ whatever there is, and an org called Gays Against Groomers was ostracized from the LGBTQ
/r/MensRights01/10/25 01:56 AM
1

If said path is outright demonstrated to be a bane on society then yeah, people OUGHT to rebuke that nonsense, and if that requires force legally and/or socially so be it in, casual dating has no fruits so it ought to be socially shunned. No, there's a reason specific demographics do better than others, everyone can have different takes on some things sure, but when you allegedly "intellectualize" yourself to the point your a passive doll you become a useless or useful tool so you can take your …
/r/MensRights30/09/25 09:52 PM
1

Well then let's keep it secular. Outside of your literal feelings why is casual dating not an issue for you. A fe-fail is just a fancier name of calling some women losers.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 09:38 PM
1

There's no disagreeing, God is real, to disagree would be saying ATLA is overrated garbage (it is) and you saying it's not, that's agree to disagree (on a level), but God is real especially via TAG. If you don't understand how casual dating is an issue you are part of the problem, you quite literally sound like a fe-fail.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 09:28 PM
1

"I don't know what your talking about but we don't do that" Seriously?
/r/MensRights30/09/25 09:25 PM
1

Yes you do and yeah, casual dating is a huge issue.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 09:15 PM
3

Girls also want things to make sense and understand the material instead of just doing well on the test. You quite literally just ignored everything he said to show this isn't necessarily true, males and females are fundamentally different dude, we don't learn the same. As for that study, first, the sample size is not impressive when we’re talking about something as broad as sex differences in cognition. Nine hundred kids is nothing compared to the millions tested in international assessments li…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 06:07 PM
2

Because there is?
/r/MensRights30/09/25 06:01 PM
0

He's not, and doesn't everyone need someone to spell things out "sometimes"?
/r/MensRights30/09/25 05:58 PM
1

Even for an atheist or whatever you should have a system that's not encouraging absolute hedonism, how are you on this subreddit while actively contributing to men's issues?
/r/MensRights30/09/25 05:58 PM
1

Morality isn't subjective and secular humanism is pure nonsense. We say "rape is wrong full stop", you say "well it's only my opinion that rape is wrong, just my opinion though", that's the difference.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 05:57 PM
0

No, you guys (you as a general term) have a whole community called MAPS
/r/MensRights30/09/25 05:55 PM
3

Live and let live is a lazy and even immoral viewpoint. It doesn’t because im in a relationship but that doesn't mean I can't talk about other people's struggles. No, it's not odd, just not a foolish one.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:57 PM
2

The funny part is the killing in question is literally one of the worst ways to go ever and that's saying something.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:49 PM
1

It's from Dark Empire, despite what people say I liked it a bit, I really liked the one where he has white eyes amd is looking at Leia but it doesn't look good as a PFP. I mean, that's part of my point, it's only "disfavorable" because people exploit such behavior or beliefs when those behaviors and beliefs in question are great qualities to have.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:46 PM
3

I don't care about your existing or nonexistent issue, the whole concept of casual dating is modern slop. Your part of the problem lol.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:44 PM
3

Your perspective is literally a reason the dating market is utter shit right now and you sound exactly like a fe-fail with this casual dating talk. But it is, just because both are in on it doesn’t mean it's not.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:29 PM
1

Usually with quotes like that is basically "good people get taken advantage of more often so people shouldn't be good", now im not saying that's what she was saying but that's the vibe I got from it and it's also something that's becoming more popular by the day. Thanks for the compliment, Luke is a god tier character across any fictional story.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:28 PM
3

Yeah, and that's also stupid, nobody should be reduced to being temporary in a flippin relationship. My critique to you about casual dating would apply to your older "partners" too. It's already selfish at least.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:23 PM
1

The issue is have with quotes like those (unless im reading incorrectly) is how often they seem to make good qualities bad because people can exploit them instead of going after the ones exploiting them.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:22 PM
1

I don't know why they'd be vexed about looks, men amd women aren't valued the same way in that department.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:20 PM
1

That exist in every demographics, differences are that one is condemned.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:16 PM
4

Except he's not? And you want to insinuate that others are dim?
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:15 PM
1

Yes, Christianity is single handedly the best thing to happen to us, whether you believe it's real or not.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:14 PM
6

Yeah amd your thought process is lacking. I don't think, I know that's a stupid preference, there's a difference.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:13 PM
3

Didn't say anything about it being your only one. I'm not bitter, I genuinely believe that's a stupid preference you have amd dating without intention of something more serious is also ridiculous, very ridiculous I might add. "OH im just dating you temporarily" That's what all that sounds like.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:12 PM
6

It literally does not, what you said can apply to people who don't go to college, if the only or even main thing that matters to you is "went to college" your preferences are borderline objectively stupid.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:06 PM
2

And that's the only shared life experience you'd have? That's not even talking about how you can have different college experiences already. Yeah, you'll just get with the ones that are demonstrably make bad wives in general, when you grow older (mentally) you'll see.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:05 PM
3

Mostly yeah
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:00 PM
8

Seeing that your criteria doesn't exclusively apply to college, this is moot.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:59 PM
4

So then how does your criteria even fit? Your criteria for shared life experience is not applicable to the idea that they are college educated? And how are those secular marriages turning out? Not good and iirc, college educated women especially don't make good wives.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:58 PM
6

Right because all of those have to do with college for some reason, it's not like those can't be things everyone enjoys or do, I never went to college and all those things are applicable, you honest to God think the majority of people interested in learning new things are college folk? Nah it was stupid before and now it's even more stupid.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:46 PM
12

Yes it is, also, you can have shares experience and values outside of education unless your life is 98% focused on education which is also at least stupid no matter how you slice it. Attending higher education? I don't know where you've been but there's nothing higher about college.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:45 PM
4

Why is passion for education such a big deal? This is unironically almost as stupid a preference as some women's preferences.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:35 PM
18

Preference or not, this is stupid as shit and is classism. It's also incredibly ignorant and narrow-minded, even historical geniuses have had issue with colleges amd things of that nature. Blud would take someone who has a degree in how cats relate to witchcraft over basically a normal woman just because lol.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:34 PM
26

This could be fixed if they just made their wants known, if a man has a real aggressive (not some initial discomfort) reaction then that's simply not a good one to be in a relationship with. It also doesn't help if your literally faking everything.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:26 PM
1

This is just a rhetorical sleight of hand, as the CONSAD report did not gain weight simply because it was commissioned by government, it gained weight because its methodology and conclusions mirror dozens of independent, peer-reviewed studies before and after 2009. Claiming it’s invalid because Bush’s administration commissioned it is fallacious. The fact that later scholars (Goldin, Blau & Kahn, etc.) independently found similar conclusions shows CONSAD was not a political anomaly. If CONSAD we…
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:22 PM
1

The CONSAD Research Corp. report commissioned by the U.S. Department of Labor in 2009 is an official government-commissioned analysis, and it concluded very clearly that most of the wage gap is explained by non-discriminatory factors such as hours worked, occupation, education, experience, and career interruptions. The “unexplained” portion was statistically small and not definitive evidence of discrimination. In other words, the claim that women are systematically underpaid for the same work is…
/r/MensRights28/09/25 12:14 AM
1

I find issues with your studies as well. Penner et al. (2023) The problem here is the aggregation bias, they pool data from 15 countries, which means huge cultural, economic, and policy differences are mashed together to make broad generalizations that don’t actually hold up in any one specific country. Another flaw is omission of control variables. Hours worked, overtime, career interruptions, and non-wage compensation like bonuses, stock options, and benefits are rarely accounted for in full. …
/r/MensRights28/09/25 12:10 AM
1

All nonsense. You admit outright this isn’t “equal pay for equal work” but average earnings differences. Average differences don’t prove discrimination instead, they reflect choices in hours worked, industries entered, and career interruptions. In the U.S., Department of Labor (CONSAD Report, 2009) concluded that most of the pay gap is explained by factors other than discrimination, such as hours, education, and experience. The term "systemic inequality" is non-falsifiable because anything that …
/r/MensRights27/09/25 11:54 PM
1

OK you've yet to see it? Explain the literal concept of Law Enforcement then lol. There’s a reason why the number one cause of death for pregnant women is homicide lol. Nope. https://www.cdc.gov/maternal-mortality/php/data-research/mmrc-2017-2019.html https://usafacts.org/articles/americans-causes-of-death-by-age-cdc-data/
/r/MensRights23/09/25 05:40 PM
1

Don't worry about it, I won't press any further
/r/MensRights23/09/25 05:30 PM
2

Yeah, I'm actually believe that some people just need an ass whoopin too lol
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:50 PM
1

unfortunately, women do tend to face more SA and it’s HORRIBLE. That not even true either, it's already about equal and that's not even talking about the fact that some wouldn't even consider it rape or SH, less likely to report it and some other stuff.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:49 PM
1

If society favors men, why draft? Why are girls doing better at school at the expense of boys? Why would the term "by other men" even exist? That fe-fail is literally talking about children being rapist, shut your corny ass up, damn loser. I bet you let your fe-fail GF walk out in dental floss.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:47 PM
1

Even if it was predominantly by other men (not even true especially when you realize women couldn't even rape men up until what? The 2000s?) So? FGM (female genital mutilation) is predominantly done on by women and predominantly supported by other women, so now i guess the crime is lesser because someone of the same demographic does it? You also sound like a white supremacist, white people talk about how "blacks are killing other blacks" in response to unjust murder or behavior to black people b…
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:43 PM
1

Id be fine with that approach (really only to your wife and family) the issue is, they won't acknowledge just how crap the dating market is, I'm looking in but even i got stressed out seeing all the crap.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:33 PM
2

Jeez I know this is painful but do you have any idea why she did such a 180?
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:31 PM
1

Slut
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:17 PM
1

Dating without the intention of marriage is an extremely stupid concept and I'm 95% convinced that if they get pregnant thier gonna murder that baby if they haven't done that multiple times already. Also, it's objectively false because of your anecdote? Be serious.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:16 PM
19

I can get behind that on a social level if women behaved like ladies.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:11 PM
3

Did you not read what I said?
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:04 PM
2

That's quite literally what your saying. Because they are also bad people? What does that have to do with the whole picture? Men are biological programmed for it so much so that we inherently have bias for women over men, obviously bad people exist, that doesn't mean literal biology goes out the window.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:04 PM
1

Your actively just ignoring the sources that say otherwise to all of this.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:00 PM
1

Again all of this is false, goes against biology, and isn't even historically accurate. This account last comment was old so I'm not gonna debunk all your comments (OP kind of already did that) right away.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 12:59 PM
1

It's as if you ignored all the sources that say otherwise. Such a nonsensical idea that even goes against men's biology.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 12:56 PM
1

Then it must be a shame for you because there's no lie here
/r/MensRights22/09/25 12:55 PM
2

Yeah that's my point about villains and such. Tbh I'm only watching it for the aliens and Wendy, overall it's just an intriguing concept.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 03:21 AM
0

No you aren't. End. Would you rather someone say this to your face with no rape or actually be raped?
/r/MensRights22/09/25 03:20 AM
1

For an ideology yeah, there's no good science from feminist that didn't exist before.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 10:45 PM
0

No they aren't, you aren't as bad as a rapist until you become one. Now on an ideological level they might be worse.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 10:12 PM
1

Kavalier is basically the villain (white male) not sure how you could think otherwise, he literally wants to experiment on people and has quite possibly killed several small children in the name of 'science'. Followed by Kirch (white male), with the only redeeming quality been that while he is portrayed by a male actor he is a synth so.... kinda like Ash he's not human. Marrow you might call a villain (black male), for now I'm happy to put him in that category until the story has a twist (which …
/r/MensRights21/09/25 10:10 PM
11

"Why don't rapist report themselves" Deadass?
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:32 PM
1

Wdym?
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:29 PM
11

Conviction rates aren't necessarily the best way to judge who does which the most
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:28 PM
0

I mean it's still true, black men are getting feminine and/or are just gangsters still, and that's just media, there's a whole thing for black women called "divested" which is basically just black women hating on black men for fantasies most don't do. As for Alien Earth, the main antagonist besides the aliens is literally a black man, Kavalier is antagonistic but overall not that bad, and the only person to stand up for the kids was a white man. The only "woke" nitpick I'd have is the red headed…
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:24 PM
5

1.Men couldn't vote for a while either and only could because of conscription rape is not systematic 3.women very much had power in government or similar institutions, even mistresses had power, or should I say especially? Not being able the get a good job is literally beyond universal for everyone at all times lol.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:20 PM
24

It's always the number of likes that gets me, but then we'll be told that people don't actually believe this in real life as if people do a complete 180 when they log off, people need to know that they just don't say it outloud.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:16 PM
-2

Nah, all the heroes are white wdym? At best black dudes get gangsters or gays, everyone else is a stereotype.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:09 PM
1

I've heard that it's not the case tho
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:03 PM
3

That's a terrible excuse for body shaming or demanding toxic beauty standards / expectations. It's expecting a person to change their identity or aesthetic specifically for you. It comes across as disrespectful and entitled and like you say, desperate Who's doing that? I'm just saying dudes are desperate. But you wouldn't be getting intimate if you didn't like armpit hair or leg hair in the first place. Being desperate is not an excuse to want to control people's bodies, it doesn't give you a ri…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 04:26 PM
2

That's why it's nonsense, what people think matters, if not, there wouldn't be laws against it and it's the same logic used by the grooming LGBTQ when they are completely naked in front of kids. It's not even about conformity, just keep that ish in your house or in that specific group, sorry but normal people will look at you (you as in general) weird for crawling on all fours with a dog mask on or just being a jerk under the guise of "just being brutally honest, I don't care what X thinks".
/r/MensRights23/08/25 03:50 AM
3

I totally agree, but why would a guy be getting intimate with someone who they're not even remotely attracted to? You aren't going to have troubles performing because they're not someone you'd be getting intimate in the first place, it's not a scenario which would happen. Because guys are desperate but anyway that's not even the part I was responding too. the basic stuff like pubic hair and natural body hair is something exaggerated immensely by porn and toxic beauty standards. Nothing wrong wit…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 03:47 AM
0

Which is why "just be true to yourself" and "who cares what people think" is pure nonsense.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 10:47 PM
49

Yeah no, no man minds a woman with some hair down there, a lot of men even prefer it that way but it's not "unmanly" for a guy who doesn't want a woman who has a literal mustache and armpit and leg hair, and no, peach fuz is not the same as those. That preference has been around LONG before porn. When we want something it's a "shallow dynamic" but never not the other way around? GTFOH.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 10:45 PM
39

It's been that way for a bit now
/r/MensRights09/08/25 01:49 PM
1

Remember when my mom told me about this, jeez.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 05:54 AM
1

It's a cop out to say "but X is not a real". And it's even worse when the so called majority at worst just doesn't even try and correct the so called minority.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 07:38 PM
6

Women aren't inherently angels on the basis of being women. And men aren't inherently evil because we're men. But man, male homicide victims are killed by other men. Meanwhile women are murdered by... once again men. What the fuck does it matter if they were killed by other men? Should we now ignore or downplay (which is what your doing or else you wouldn't have said that) female gentital mutilation just because the vast majority of people who preform them are women? And women kill women to what…
/r/MensRights21/07/25 08:51 AM
1

That's a shame, maybe go grow some moral backbone.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 09:28 PM
1

One piece - the only relevant female top tier is big mom who was killed unceremoniously and treated as a gag during the entirety of wano the next best two option are a woman whose power only works if you get boner and the other has the ability to wash clothes and people Based off this nonsense alone I can already tell you frequent r/piratefolk. And this perfectly captures what I mean when I made this comment not to long ago. "And don't even get me started on how people just completely dismiss he…
/r/MensRights10/07/25 05:30 AM
1

Dude, stop obfuscating, gravity has nothing to do with anything you've claimed.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 04:16 PM
1

Except the fact we have? And what does that have to do with any of your claims?
/r/MensRights08/07/25 01:26 PM
1

It really isn't and you can't prove it
/r/MensRights07/07/25 01:46 AM
3

Has this guy provided ANY studies?
/r/MensRights06/07/25 08:42 AM
2

That's not a fact on any objective study
/r/MensRights06/07/25 08:40 AM
2

Except they don't and it's actually women who commit those crimes against children? Also the whole abortion thing which is murder
/r/MensRights05/07/25 12:09 PM
2

Kick her ass to the curb dude, pls.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 12:08 PM
2

The ladder doesn't suffice because just because something hits national news doesn't make it worse than something. And no objective study says men are more likely to abuse especially since it's women who lead in all facets of crimes against children. Not even counting abortion (murder)
/r/MensRights05/07/25 12:06 PM
4

Lima overrated anyway and she has the body of the cardboard box next to me. Also this applies to media and art to, nobody bats an eye when it's men but as soon as we see the female body it's a bad thing. Took me a bit to realize you can never truly win.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 12:03 PM
0

"Fellow"?
/r/MensRights25/06/25 09:39 AM
1

Its a copout
/r/MensRights25/06/25 09:35 AM
1

The ragebait puts us below beast dude, that's not minor
/r/MensRights25/06/25 09:33 AM
1

A bear would murder a gorilla 9.9/10
/r/MensRights25/06/25 09:32 AM
1

A few comments (that are valid) vs. Entire organizations and media 🤔
/r/MensRights13/06/25 11:08 PM
1

That's... not what feminism is nearly. The point is for women to reach equality in terms of social dynamics, especially terms of systemic sexism as opposed to systematic sexism in the past. They do not want women to dominate culture over men, they simply want women and men to have equal representation in modern society, of which much of media and government systems disproportionately represent the male population. Well that's not the message it puts out (overtly) but as we have been seeing for d…
/r/MensRights13/06/25 09:36 PM
1

Nobody within the feminist movement truly believes that. This is what I mean by how radical perspectives are disproportionately represented in the media. Most feminists acknowledge that men experience SA extremely often. “It is inappropriate to consider as a rape victim a man who engages in unwanted sexual intercourse with a woman.” She elaborated “Although consideration of male victims is within the scope of the legal statutes, it is important to restrict the term rape to instances where male v…
/r/MensRights13/06/25 09:31 PM
1

From your descriptions of feminism, I'm seeing that your understanding of feminism is regurgitated from anti-feminist echo-chambers that immensely misrepresent the movement. Or straight from feminist themselves, literally, did a very prominent feminist not say that women can't rape men or was this speaker of feminist not a real feminist? You always come out on top with that cop out logic but even then it's trash, considering the so called "real" feminist say not one thing. Doesn't matter though …
/r/MensRights13/06/25 08:45 PM
1

Your basically just repeating these same things in your other comment that I've responded too just now, so I'll leave this alone.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 03:20 PM
1

Feminists commend and acknowledge all of these issues. In fact, a part of feminism is advocating for men's mental health, which can be detrimented due to harsh gender stereotypes. No they dont, obviously there's some things so they can keep up a facade but everything literally points to the opposite happening, it was feminist who shutdown a man trying open a men's shelter. You're neglecting the fact that even in two-parent households, women are still the primary caretakers of the children and wo…
/r/MensRights13/06/25 03:17 PM
1

You may not be doing this on purpose or even at all but I love how people talk about circumstance and poverty and things of that nature when it's women, I've literally never seen that same train of thought applied to men and even when feminists do do it, they still blame the man, as they should because ultimately it's a choice. No similar allowance is made for low-income fathers, combat veterans, unemployed men, or men with mental health issues. The National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Ne…
/r/MensRights12/06/25 11:59 PM
1

What are traits that are found exclusively in men that cannot be taught by women? Bravery, courage, strength, how to treat women, even male puberty are all concepts that can be taught by experts within those areas, regardless of gender. Male influence is important, but feminism is not trying to dismantle or rid of it, it is trying to eradicate toxic masculinity, which causes violence and discrimination to numerous marginalized communities. This is a non sequitur of my whole stance and is a borde…
/r/MensRights12/06/25 11:58 PM
1

Research still showed that women with equal income still had worse outcomes.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 09:14 PM
1

Additionally "abuse" is an iffy term that is commonly debated. A lot of abusive cases from the mother have been shown to be punishment in the forms of smacking, whereas severe physical abuse is more likely from the father (which tracks). If we have to debate influence, then it is shown that women who have been hit by their male partners are more likely to hit their children. The "masculine influence" contained violence that passed onto the mother, then to the children. The entire subject of men …
/r/MensRights12/06/25 09:11 PM
1

It's not about masculine influence, my mother influenced me much more than my father did as he was working, and grew up around women and girls as friends, close ones, etc. and I also received the positive benefits you state. It's about having two parents. Yeah it literally is, if that's true it's an anecdote which isn't congruent in the general sense obviously. Maybe when it's one person raising the child when the dad leaves them, they have to focus more on working and feeding the child, which r…
/r/MensRights12/06/25 09:11 PM
1

You probably barley comprehended what he was talking about despite him still being hilariously wrong.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 09:03 PM
1

For what? The most objectively wrong takes on the subject?
/r/MensRights12/06/25 09:02 PM
1

The sisterhood ain't saying shit about it either so your point?
/r/MensRights26/05/25 08:01 PM
2

You can't
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:26 PM
2

I wouldn't say Goku represents all the positive aspects, someone like Aragorn or Superman are better examples and are more applicable to real life.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter