TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LacksBeard Archive

View 0 posts and 147 comments by LacksBeard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So Women are acting crazy, mentally, emotionally, and physically abusing men and children and still Women most affected, smh.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 12:03 AM
1

Also. https://www.tmz.com/2011/08/10/camille-grammer-kelsey-grammer-small-penis-video-real-housewives-of-beverly-hills/
/r/MensRights10/07/26 08:10 PM
1

"Nah, I’m just not an incel that hates women but obsesses over them at the same time." Nah you clearly are a dumbass, your genuinely almost on the level of a guy I once seen who said that washing your body with a singular bar of soap cleans you because it cleans dishes that way. It's been a while since someone made me set my phone to the side and contemplate what's NOT going through their head. "Also, that’s a lot of words to just say you haven’t ever actually seen, heard, or experienced any wom…
/r/MensRights10/07/26 08:08 PM
3

"“Why do I need to experience or see a thing to ‘notice’ it?” 🤦🏻‍♂️ Because that’s how human sensation works, if you don’t experience / see something happen then you are just assuming / speculating that it happens. That’s the crux of my entire point. You are asserting that “women” do this terrible thing to men, but you can’t name a single instance of it happening in your actual life that you’ve ever seen or experienced. At best it’s gossip, at worst it’s libel. You are perpetuating a negative tr…
/r/MensRights10/07/26 07:54 PM
3

"I said that making a woman cum through mind blowing sex being the most important quality of a man only happens in porn and I said most women don’t cum from PIV. Those two things are in no way contradictory. Certainly there are “some” humans that do ‘anything you can come up with an example of’ so there are ‘some’ women that shame men for having a small penis and there are ‘some’ women fly into space and there are ‘some’ women that murder their own children and there are ‘some’ women that… fill …
/r/MensRights10/07/26 07:08 PM
3

"That only happens in porn, not real life" "Most women don't cum from PIV" As in some do so you just contradicted yourself, also your other comments are stupid especially if you think women don't shame men for having small a penis.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 09:26 PM
1

Stop acting like there's not a genuine issue between men and women in the west.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 03:32 PM
1

Nah, it's still women that abuse children AT LEAST as equal to men. I just made multiple comments about this very thing actually.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 03:30 PM
1

Telling me to use my brain but your arguments in the other thread is a big ol appeal to nature fallacy lol. From CDC. 87% of male victims of (completed or attempted) rape reported only male perpetrators. 79% of male victims of being made to penetrate reported only female perpetrators. 82% of male victims of sexual coercion reported only female perpetrators. 53% of male victims of unwanted sexual contact reported only female perpetrators. 48% of male victims of lifetime non-contact unwanted sexua…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 03:33 AM
1

Notice how you didn't actually refute it tho? And how did i pull it out my ass and yet you just listed where it potentially came from? Use your head.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 03:13 AM
1

Because if I say people of a group often does a thing more than others someone will say, "but i know someone of that group that doesn't do that" and I can just say the same thing in reverse on how someone of that group did the thing.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 02:41 AM
1

People have conversations about all types of things doesn't mean it's going anywhere. And it doesn't make a stronger point, it'd basically be a loop until someone starts generalizing
/r/MensRights17/06/26 02:32 AM
1

Because no conversation would go anywhere if people could just say "but I know someone who doesn't do that" or things of that nature
/r/MensRights17/06/26 02:26 AM
3

And this matters in regards to his question because? All your doing is obfuscating from the question. Should there be segregation based on race because some races may or may not commit more violent crime? Everything else you said is essentially irrelevant to that question especially considering there's next to no 1:1 parallels with humans to begin with.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 06:32 PM
3

You didn't explain shit, like this new comment, your previous one where you apparently "explained" it away was you just making a baseless assertion and a asking a question which doesn't fly considering he asked you a question first. The common denominator is immutable characteristics so stop being a wuss.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 06:23 PM
-1

The same reason everyone ever makes generalizations?
/r/MensRights09/06/26 06:19 PM
1

If they get no help and no support then how are the awful women being held accountable? Also if you blocked that other guy your a wuss.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 06:18 PM
3

That's just a pussyfoot way of obfusactating out of addressing his question, both are immutable characteristics. He nor anyone should have to answer that question when you didn't address his.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 06:15 PM
2

Blatantly not true, actual non biased statistics or statistics with suspect methodology have at least around equal.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 05:42 PM
1

Also nice chat bot
/r/MensRights09/06/26 05:22 PM
1

Have you been paying attention to anything? ANYTHING boy related is "critiqued".
/r/MensRights09/06/26 05:21 PM
1

Nice chatbot folk
/r/MensRights09/06/26 05:15 PM
8

Honestly a thing that happens in general, people are just fine with positive comments but if one is not pure praise that person is just a hater or something. A piece of wet toilet paper is 1000x stronger than a lot of people backbone nowadays
/r/MensRights09/06/26 04:59 PM
4

You need to consume more media if you think PunPun is unmatched, especially in regards to men's issues, it's above average.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 11:34 PM
4

Old gender roles worked, the contract has been broken.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 12:21 AM
3

You don't know who I voted for and being lonely has nothing to do with whether matriarchies are better than patriarchy, which they arent.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 11:31 PM
1

There is no proof. Oh ok, I guess nature gave you your technological device, your house, your toilet, car etc, I'm sure i can just find one absent humans right? Men didn't steal from women because women by and large don't invent like men amd they still don't and I hope you realize that marginalized groups include men too.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 11:20 PM
2

I didn't see that, anyway, it's still a no that there's successful matriarchies anywhere at any time and there's no evidence to think it's better than patriarchy that gives you all the conveniences you love.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 11:09 PM
2

You mean native Americans? They aren't matriarchal bro
/r/MensRights18/03/26 11:00 PM
3

Not even advanced, just successful, as for the rest, I can't see your comment
/r/MensRights18/03/26 10:44 PM
2

Can't believe this crap has a single upvote. And a matriarchal society would be trash, there's a reason there's not one advanced matriarchal society. As for the rest, first off the idea that civilizations like the Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, and Aztecs “failed because of patriarchy” is way too simplistic to be taken seriously at all. Those societies lasted hundreds to thousands of years amd the Fall of the Western Roman Empire, for example, wasn’t caused by “men in charge" it was a mix of economi…
/r/MensRights18/03/26 10:14 PM
0

The only decent all women sub is r/vindictaratecelebs
/r/MensRights28/01/26 12:08 PM
2

No, you get blocked for doing things like denying that rape and abuse happened. You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't get into with reason. Never once denied that and right back at you. You then spam responded to a bunch of linked sources with zero counter sources all within a few minutes of each other proving you didn't read any of the sources at all. They were fine counters and I've already been had most of the things I link in these type of discussions because you feminist al…
/r/MensRights27/01/26 06:36 AM
1

Classic internet Rome take, a mash-up of half-truths, legal anachronism, and modern ideology projected backwards onto a civilization that operated on a completely different social logic. Let’s start with the biggest falsehood: “women were the legal property of their husbands.” That is not Roman law and that description fits only one early and increasingly rare form of marriage, manus marriage. By the late Republic and throughout the Empire, the dominant form was sine manu marriage, in which a wo…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:47 AM
1

The claims in those sources by the way you framed them particularly around hysteria and lobotomies, are misleading. The term “hysteria” in early psychiatry but it was a catch-all diagnosis that could include anxiety, depression, epilepsy, or neurological disorders, and while it was disproportionately applied to women, it was not universally used to justify forced lobotomies or institutionalization for “defiance of husbands” or sexual behavior. Most women labeled with hysteria were receiving trea…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:14 AM
5

The best feminist tool is to put what someone said in a short version with quotations because there's nothing they can actually say against the actual claim. I'm gonna go ahead and refute your other stuff right quick. Edit: lol now I know the reason nobody is responding to your nonsense, you do nothing but block people before you amd your claims can get cooked to much
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:08 AM
2

I don't get it, these women are financially independent way before 50 years ago, what's with the goalpost shift? I could refutes this anyway though, but maybe later.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:02 AM
1

Women did work in agrarian societies, but not equally in type, volume, or social recognition compared to men. In most pre-industrial agrarian societies, labor was highly gendered. Men did heavy fieldwork, ploughing, animal husbandry, constructing buildings, managing forests, and hunting and so this work required raw physical strength and was central to food production and survival. Women typically handled domestic agriculture, such as gardening, weeding, milking, collecting eggs, food processing…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:01 AM
2

“Roman women couldn’t live without men, had no education, couldn’t participate in society that’s the literal definition of oppression.” Is your stance right? Well it's bogus. First off, Roman women were citizens with legal status and agency in many areas, not mere extensions of men. They did have limitations compared to men (no voting, no public office), but they still exercised real autonomy in areas that also mattered. They could own, inherit, manage, and dispose of property independently in m…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 06:53 AM
2

Over 200 million women worldwide have had their genitalia cut off. Now it'd be a problem in feminist circles if i said "but by other women" now would it?
/r/MensRights26/01/26 06:45 AM
2

When people say "women were not oppressed for centuries" what we mean is that there wasn't a holistic agreement by men to subjugate women just for being women, ESPECIALLY when 8/10 the same grievances can apply to men and not solely women.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 06:43 AM
3

First, coverture did not make women property, that is a blatant lie. Married women were legally dependent on their husbands in some ways, yes, but they were never chattel. They could own dowries, inherit land, and in practice, they ran households, farms, businesses, and even estates, often holding far more power than you acknowledges. The idea that widows “returned to their fathers’ control” is laughably fals as widows often became legally and financially independent, sometimes commanding more a…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 06:41 AM
3

Bro-man, link me that comment, id be more than happy to refute that.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 10:45 AM
6

Believe me, as a Black man, we are definitely facing issues too, whether it's leftist wolves in sheep's clothes or our own women spitting out sheer venom. Just look up divestment black women.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 10:43 AM
5

"True feminism" pushes for nothing but the elevation of women at the expense of men and boys, what your talking about is basic decency, not feminism nonsense. And since when did patriarchy push this idea? (also nice victim blaming btw) drop the feminist idea of patriarchy and look at what it actually is and what it produces, aka, the bedrock of civilization.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 05:45 PM
4

He's not angry at all women, just feminists women and in such, it is a valid name to call. If misandry exist because of misogyny then where did misogyny come from?
/r/MensRights23/12/25 05:43 PM
0

And what ways are those?
/r/MensRights15/12/25 06:22 AM
0

Islam is crap but Christianity is the answer to really everything, and come off it what's so bad with the "slavery" of telling people not to murder and it actually has a reason outside of "Muh preferences"? Yall can act like brow-beaten sissies sometimes I swear.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 06:21 AM
1

Saying gender roles are BS makes you as bad and as annoying as feminist or very close to it.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 06:20 AM
4

I had a debate about conscription not to long ago and never thought about it like that, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 02:47 AM
3

Choose the right one
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 02:45 AM
5

I think the overall point is that feminists will project their narratives in to just about anything
/r/MensRights24/11/25 04:27 AM
29

I always ask that if thier son was accused of SA would they instantly side with his accuser.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 04:25 AM
5

I genuinely thought it was a skit or something fake until I saw the police report.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 04:23 AM
1

Yeah it does matter about your stance on abortion. Its where you draw the line between foetus and baby. I think a lot of countries have a good definition of being the point of viability. Once a baby is viable to be born and likely to survive outside the mother, there is no justification for killing it. It's always been a baby, what do you think fetus means? Go ahead and copy paste the definition of the word fetus and offspring. There's no justification to begin with. Its wild that they even ackn…
/r/MensRights18/11/25 12:35 PM
1

Oh, well, I think he meant human made issues.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 04:11 PM
1

TB?
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:17 PM
1

This actually strengthens the pro life or the better side of abolitionist. The fact that your body naturally incorporated your twin isn’t framed as “you killed your brother.” It’s a biological event that happens WITHOUT intention, without agency, without any moral capacity behind it. Nature causing death has never been considered morally equivalent to a person causing death. If a lightning strike kills someone, no courtroom opens the next morning. If a parent intentionally drowns someone in the …
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:16 PM
0

Terrible method, not to long ago slavery was legal and in some places still is, is slavery now ok?
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:09 PM
1

Yes it is
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:08 PM
0

Yeah, abortion is probably the biggest collective evil of all time, i say probably only because I dont know what happened when the Earth was flooded by God.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:08 PM
1

Why
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:07 PM
2

Stance doesn't matter, its is murder
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:06 PM
0

Likely? Idk but women do in fact murder more than men. It's called abortion.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:06 PM
1

None of this should then allow prison abolishing or people to support it.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 09:36 AM
1

I wouldn't say that, especially of we count animation. Master Splinter, I'm pretty sure Superman was a dad in a show, Mae Hughes, Atticus Finch, Ned Stark, Phillip Banks. When it comes to things like this I don't think there's a single greatest dad or mom, of course some are better than others but anyone who had a good dad thinks theirs is the best despite the dad's obviously being different people in most regards. Edit: a movie series and not TV i know but let's not forget Gomez Addams. Edit 2:…
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:21 AM
1

If a man is not stronger than he has some issues
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:15 AM
2

What European countries like Sweden? A low and homogeneous population? Calling prison madness and injustice but offering absolutely NOTHING to victims smh.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:10 AM
0

The criminals should live in your house and be your neighbors then. Edit: cornball blocked me must be
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:09 AM
2

When someone commits a crime, they have used their freedom to violate the rights of others. Morally, that choice carries weight. Deserving punishment isn’t about cruelty, it’s about justice proportional to the act. If a person steals from someone, it’s not justifiable for society to shrug and say, “Oh, they don’t need consequences because punishment is unpleasant.” The victim’s rights, the trust in the community, and the natural expectation of fairness demand a response. Punishment acknowledges …
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:09 AM
3

Nah, it's pretty widely known they don't care as much as dudes
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:03 AM
-5

How do you know you have a better sex life than straight couples and why does it have to be specifically be straight couples? Ive seen many homosexual relationships where they say they dont like having sex with thier boyfriend or girlfriend. What Devil Fruit gave you that power? Anyway, I don't really know, I think you can definitely make this argument but go to any source of a female teacher raping a child and you'll see the infamous "wish it were me" comment by the thousands, where I know they…
/r/MensRights03/11/25 04:51 AM
6

Well those 60 percent must also genuinely hate men too because who say such things and not have any negativity towards that demographic.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 04:44 AM
3

I said you could be lying. Dude, the point is is that women don't go into those extensively laborious jobs of their own choice. It's not a sweeping generalization, all of those jobs at the very very least at least are 80% men, so it's not cognitive distortion it's a fact.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 10:21 PM
56

First off, nobody here knows your feeling the truth, you could be lying your rear off second off, even if that were true have you ever heard of the concept of an "OUTLIER"? Nobody said women don't exist in them but women for dang sure aren't going in drives for them either despite having all the ability to do so, nice try tho.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 08:06 AM
1

A yes it’s so nice to have all your decisions made for you and have generally no autonomy "Women made an awful decision with feminism lol they had the easiest life imaginable, no financial stress and no 9 to 5... Sign me up lol Also equality is impossible because men and women are not equal, no matter how hard we will it. The only time women keep up is when we change the rules to accommodate it. So no, equality can't happen." Where did you possibly get the idea that this person wants other thing…
/r/MensRights26/10/25 02:45 AM
1

"I don't know what your talking about but we don't do that" Seriously?
/r/MensRights30/09/25 09:25 PM
3

Girls also want things to make sense and understand the material instead of just doing well on the test. You quite literally just ignored everything he said to show this isn't necessarily true, males and females are fundamentally different dude, we don't learn the same. As for that study, first, the sample size is not impressive when we’re talking about something as broad as sex differences in cognition. Nine hundred kids is nothing compared to the millions tested in international assessments li…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 06:07 PM
2

Because there is?
/r/MensRights30/09/25 06:01 PM
0

He's not, and doesn't everyone need someone to spell things out "sometimes"?
/r/MensRights30/09/25 05:58 PM
0

No, you guys (you as a general term) have a whole community called MAPS
/r/MensRights30/09/25 05:55 PM
2

The funny part is the killing in question is literally one of the worst ways to go ever and that's saying something.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:49 PM
1

The issue is have with quotes like those (unless im reading incorrectly) is how often they seem to make good qualities bad because people can exploit them instead of going after the ones exploiting them.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:22 PM
1

I don't know why they'd be vexed about looks, men amd women aren't valued the same way in that department.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:20 PM
1

That exist in every demographics, differences are that one is condemned.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:16 PM
4

Except he's not? And you want to insinuate that others are dim?
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:15 PM
1

Yes, Christianity is single handedly the best thing to happen to us, whether you believe it's real or not.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:14 PM
6

Yeah amd your thought process is lacking. I don't think, I know that's a stupid preference, there's a difference.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:13 PM
6

It literally does not, what you said can apply to people who don't go to college, if the only or even main thing that matters to you is "went to college" your preferences are borderline objectively stupid.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:06 PM
2

And that's the only shared life experience you'd have? That's not even talking about how you can have different college experiences already. Yeah, you'll just get with the ones that are demonstrably make bad wives in general, when you grow older (mentally) you'll see.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:05 PM
3

Mostly yeah
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:00 PM
8

Seeing that your criteria doesn't exclusively apply to college, this is moot.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:59 PM
4

So then how does your criteria even fit? Your criteria for shared life experience is not applicable to the idea that they are college educated? And how are those secular marriages turning out? Not good and iirc, college educated women especially don't make good wives.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:58 PM
6

Right because all of those have to do with college for some reason, it's not like those can't be things everyone enjoys or do, I never went to college and all those things are applicable, you honest to God think the majority of people interested in learning new things are college folk? Nah it was stupid before and now it's even more stupid.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:46 PM
12

Yes it is, also, you can have shares experience and values outside of education unless your life is 98% focused on education which is also at least stupid no matter how you slice it. Attending higher education? I don't know where you've been but there's nothing higher about college.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:45 PM
4

Why is passion for education such a big deal? This is unironically almost as stupid a preference as some women's preferences.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:35 PM
18

Preference or not, this is stupid as shit and is classism. It's also incredibly ignorant and narrow-minded, even historical geniuses have had issue with colleges amd things of that nature. Blud would take someone who has a degree in how cats relate to witchcraft over basically a normal woman just because lol.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:34 PM
26

This could be fixed if they just made their wants known, if a man has a real aggressive (not some initial discomfort) reaction then that's simply not a good one to be in a relationship with. It also doesn't help if your literally faking everything.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:26 PM
1

This is just a rhetorical sleight of hand, as the CONSAD report did not gain weight simply because it was commissioned by government, it gained weight because its methodology and conclusions mirror dozens of independent, peer-reviewed studies before and after 2009. Claiming it’s invalid because Bush’s administration commissioned it is fallacious. The fact that later scholars (Goldin, Blau & Kahn, etc.) independently found similar conclusions shows CONSAD was not a political anomaly. If CONSAD we…
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:22 PM
1

The CONSAD Research Corp. report commissioned by the U.S. Department of Labor in 2009 is an official government-commissioned analysis, and it concluded very clearly that most of the wage gap is explained by non-discriminatory factors such as hours worked, occupation, education, experience, and career interruptions. The “unexplained” portion was statistically small and not definitive evidence of discrimination. In other words, the claim that women are systematically underpaid for the same work is…
/r/MensRights28/09/25 12:14 AM
1

I find issues with your studies as well. Penner et al. (2023) The problem here is the aggregation bias, they pool data from 15 countries, which means huge cultural, economic, and policy differences are mashed together to make broad generalizations that don’t actually hold up in any one specific country. Another flaw is omission of control variables. Hours worked, overtime, career interruptions, and non-wage compensation like bonuses, stock options, and benefits are rarely accounted for in full. …
/r/MensRights28/09/25 12:10 AM
1

All nonsense. You admit outright this isn’t “equal pay for equal work” but average earnings differences. Average differences don’t prove discrimination instead, they reflect choices in hours worked, industries entered, and career interruptions. In the U.S., Department of Labor (CONSAD Report, 2009) concluded that most of the pay gap is explained by factors other than discrimination, such as hours, education, and experience. The term "systemic inequality" is non-falsifiable because anything that …
/r/MensRights27/09/25 11:54 PM
1

OK you've yet to see it? Explain the literal concept of Law Enforcement then lol. There’s a reason why the number one cause of death for pregnant women is homicide lol. Nope. https://www.cdc.gov/maternal-mortality/php/data-research/mmrc-2017-2019.html https://usafacts.org/articles/americans-causes-of-death-by-age-cdc-data/
/r/MensRights23/09/25 05:40 PM
1

Don't worry about it, I won't press any further
/r/MensRights23/09/25 05:30 PM
2

Yeah, I'm actually believe that some people just need an ass whoopin too lol
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:50 PM
1

unfortunately, women do tend to face more SA and it’s HORRIBLE. That not even true either, it's already about equal and that's not even talking about the fact that some wouldn't even consider it rape or SH, less likely to report it and some other stuff.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:49 PM
1

If society favors men, why draft? Why are girls doing better at school at the expense of boys? Why would the term "by other men" even exist? That fe-fail is literally talking about children being rapist, shut your corny ass up, damn loser. I bet you let your fe-fail GF walk out in dental floss.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:47 PM
1

Even if it was predominantly by other men (not even true especially when you realize women couldn't even rape men up until what? The 2000s?) So? FGM (female genital mutilation) is predominantly done on by women and predominantly supported by other women, so now i guess the crime is lesser because someone of the same demographic does it? You also sound like a white supremacist, white people talk about how "blacks are killing other blacks" in response to unjust murder or behavior to black people b…
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:43 PM
1

Id be fine with that approach (really only to your wife and family) the issue is, they won't acknowledge just how crap the dating market is, I'm looking in but even i got stressed out seeing all the crap.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:33 PM
2

Jeez I know this is painful but do you have any idea why she did such a 180?
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:31 PM
1

Dating without the intention of marriage is an extremely stupid concept and I'm 95% convinced that if they get pregnant thier gonna murder that baby if they haven't done that multiple times already. Also, it's objectively false because of your anecdote? Be serious.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:16 PM
19

I can get behind that on a social level if women behaved like ladies.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:11 PM
3

Did you not read what I said?
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:04 PM
2

That's quite literally what your saying. Because they are also bad people? What does that have to do with the whole picture? Men are biological programmed for it so much so that we inherently have bias for women over men, obviously bad people exist, that doesn't mean literal biology goes out the window.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 01:04 PM
2

Yeah that's my point about villains and such. Tbh I'm only watching it for the aliens and Wendy, overall it's just an intriguing concept.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 03:21 AM
0

No you aren't. End. Would you rather someone say this to your face with no rape or actually be raped?
/r/MensRights22/09/25 03:20 AM
1

For an ideology yeah, there's no good science from feminist that didn't exist before.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 10:45 PM
0

No they aren't, you aren't as bad as a rapist until you become one. Now on an ideological level they might be worse.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 10:12 PM
1

Kavalier is basically the villain (white male) not sure how you could think otherwise, he literally wants to experiment on people and has quite possibly killed several small children in the name of 'science'. Followed by Kirch (white male), with the only redeeming quality been that while he is portrayed by a male actor he is a synth so.... kinda like Ash he's not human. Marrow you might call a villain (black male), for now I'm happy to put him in that category until the story has a twist (which …
/r/MensRights21/09/25 10:10 PM
11

"Why don't rapist report themselves" Deadass?
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:32 PM
1

Wdym?
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:29 PM
11

Conviction rates aren't necessarily the best way to judge who does which the most
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:28 PM
0

I mean it's still true, black men are getting feminine and/or are just gangsters still, and that's just media, there's a whole thing for black women called "divested" which is basically just black women hating on black men for fantasies most don't do. As for Alien Earth, the main antagonist besides the aliens is literally a black man, Kavalier is antagonistic but overall not that bad, and the only person to stand up for the kids was a white man. The only "woke" nitpick I'd have is the red headed…
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:24 PM
5

1.Men couldn't vote for a while either and only could because of conscription rape is not systematic 3.women very much had power in government or similar institutions, even mistresses had power, or should I say especially? Not being able the get a good job is literally beyond universal for everyone at all times lol.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:20 PM
24

It's always the number of likes that gets me, but then we'll be told that people don't actually believe this in real life as if people do a complete 180 when they log off, people need to know that they just don't say it outloud.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:16 PM
-2

Nah, all the heroes are white wdym? At best black dudes get gangsters or gays, everyone else is a stereotype.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:09 PM
3

That's a terrible excuse for body shaming or demanding toxic beauty standards / expectations. It's expecting a person to change their identity or aesthetic specifically for you. It comes across as disrespectful and entitled and like you say, desperate Who's doing that? I'm just saying dudes are desperate. But you wouldn't be getting intimate if you didn't like armpit hair or leg hair in the first place. Being desperate is not an excuse to want to control people's bodies, it doesn't give you a ri…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 04:26 PM
2

That's why it's nonsense, what people think matters, if not, there wouldn't be laws against it and it's the same logic used by the grooming LGBTQ when they are completely naked in front of kids. It's not even about conformity, just keep that ish in your house or in that specific group, sorry but normal people will look at you (you as in general) weird for crawling on all fours with a dog mask on or just being a jerk under the guise of "just being brutally honest, I don't care what X thinks".
/r/MensRights23/08/25 03:50 AM
3

I totally agree, but why would a guy be getting intimate with someone who they're not even remotely attracted to? You aren't going to have troubles performing because they're not someone you'd be getting intimate in the first place, it's not a scenario which would happen. Because guys are desperate but anyway that's not even the part I was responding too. the basic stuff like pubic hair and natural body hair is something exaggerated immensely by porn and toxic beauty standards. Nothing wrong wit…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 03:47 AM
0

Which is why "just be true to yourself" and "who cares what people think" is pure nonsense.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 10:47 PM
49

Yeah no, no man minds a woman with some hair down there, a lot of men even prefer it that way but it's not "unmanly" for a guy who doesn't want a woman who has a literal mustache and armpit and leg hair, and no, peach fuz is not the same as those. That preference has been around LONG before porn. When we want something it's a "shallow dynamic" but never not the other way around? GTFOH.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 10:45 PM
39

It's been that way for a bit now
/r/MensRights09/08/25 01:49 PM
1

It's a cop out to say "but X is not a real". And it's even worse when the so called majority at worst just doesn't even try and correct the so called minority.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 07:38 PM
6

Women aren't inherently angels on the basis of being women. And men aren't inherently evil because we're men. But man, male homicide victims are killed by other men. Meanwhile women are murdered by... once again men. What the fuck does it matter if they were killed by other men? Should we now ignore or downplay (which is what your doing or else you wouldn't have said that) female gentital mutilation just because the vast majority of people who preform them are women? And women kill women to what…
/r/MensRights21/07/25 08:51 AM
1

One piece - the only relevant female top tier is big mom who was killed unceremoniously and treated as a gag during the entirety of wano the next best two option are a woman whose power only works if you get boner and the other has the ability to wash clothes and people Based off this nonsense alone I can already tell you frequent r/piratefolk. And this perfectly captures what I mean when I made this comment not to long ago. "And don't even get me started on how people just completely dismiss he…
/r/MensRights10/07/25 05:30 AM
2

Except they don't and it's actually women who commit those crimes against children? Also the whole abortion thing which is murder
/r/MensRights05/07/25 12:09 PM
2

Kick her ass to the curb dude, pls.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 12:08 PM
2

The ladder doesn't suffice because just because something hits national news doesn't make it worse than something. And no objective study says men are more likely to abuse especially since it's women who lead in all facets of crimes against children. Not even counting abortion (murder)
/r/MensRights05/07/25 12:06 PM
4

Lima overrated anyway and she has the body of the cardboard box next to me. Also this applies to media and art to, nobody bats an eye when it's men but as soon as we see the female body it's a bad thing. Took me a bit to realize you can never truly win.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 12:03 PM
0

"Fellow"?
/r/MensRights25/06/25 09:39 AM
1

Its a copout
/r/MensRights25/06/25 09:35 AM
1

The ragebait puts us below beast dude, that's not minor
/r/MensRights25/06/25 09:33 AM
1

A bear would murder a gorilla 9.9/10
/r/MensRights25/06/25 09:32 AM
1

A few comments (that are valid) vs. Entire organizations and media 🤔
/r/MensRights13/06/25 11:08 PM
1

The sisterhood ain't saying shit about it either so your point?
/r/MensRights26/05/25 08:01 PM
2

You can't
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:26 PM
2

I wouldn't say Goku represents all the positive aspects, someone like Aragorn or Superman are better examples and are more applicable to real life.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter