TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LadyMoustache Archive

View 0 posts and 185 comments by LadyMoustache on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

The examples you gave don't prove any of the claims you just made. You realize that no? Calling men cowards when they don't dare to approach a woman and not upholding male gender roles has zero to do with holding other men accountable for things like cheating, lying, ghosting, etc. Do you have any research to back-up your claim? "Trust me bro" is not gonna cut it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 02:27 AM
1

Lol! I thought you were talking about holding others accountable for shitty behaviour (cheating, ghosting, lying, using others for your own benefit, etc.), not for this kind of nonsense. Your male examples have nothing to do with accountability in my opinion, so to be honest, I don't understand your point at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 01:57 AM
1

Men don't hold other men accountable for anything either, so what's the issue? There's good people and there's bad people in the world. Avoid the bad ones. It's quite a simple concept really, although avoiding the bad ones might involve a learning curve.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 12:36 AM
4

What "equal accountability"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 04:14 AM
8

No, I'm describing a reality women are not prepared to deal with anymore and shitty men can't handle that. If wanting a man who's properly taking care of his own children is hypergamy, the bar is in hell indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 02:13 AM
9

It is true! In my country, 50/50 custody is always proposed by the judge and a lot of fathers don't want it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 12:10 AM
14

Stop crying about feminists. Men make it shit. A shitload of you literally prove it every day. You don't want to be fathers, you want to show your dick works and dump all the actual work on the woman. Meanwhile a lot of you are absolutely not attracted to pregnant women or the after effects of pregnancy and look for sex elsewhere, or you decide you don't really like being a daddy after all and fuck off, usually while crying about how having to pay child support is so unfair. And no, I'm not talk…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:34 PM
15

You don't need college to realize motherhood is shit. We have eyes you know. If you want kids as a woman, be prepared to be a single mother. Chances are great you'll be one at some point in your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 09:03 PM
1

Using research on bullies to make a statement about serial killers is like making a statement about apples using a study on oranges. Serial killers are a very specific, very small subset of people with complex social and psychological issues. Women dating bullies or not says zero about them wanting serial killers over shy guys. As far as I can tell, most serial killers weren't bullies at all, so what are you proving here? Bullies aren't necessarily sociopaths either btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 03:49 PM
2

Do you have any idea how many bullies there are? If all of these people became serial killers, there wouldn't be anyone left on the planet. Is it proven even de majority of serial killers were bullies before they became serial killers? Edit: "Jeffrey Dahmer. Ted Bundy. John Wayne Gacy. What do these three notorious men have in common? Obviously, all three were horrific serial killers. Also important, however, is that all three were bullied in school." - https://www.thehumanityproject.com/new-pag…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 01:51 PM
0

And there is absolutely no difference between a serial killer and a bully. All bullies become serial killers eventually. It is known.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 12:11 PM
1

It is about porn. He thinks amateur porn is people filming their real lives. He believes all women would behave like porn actresses for the right men (big dicked studs and such) and he thinks all women are just restraining their true sexuality. We would all be into all kinds of crazy sex acts if we were sexually liberated. He's into fetishes and kinks as well I believe. I think that sums up my conversation with him yesterday and earlier today.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 12:29 AM
4

I had a discussion with him yesterday. He thinks porn is real life. That's where he gets his information from, apparently x)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 11:44 PM
10

Especially when it comes to sex and relationships, you don't really want to be born a woman, you want to be born a man in a womans body. That's not the same thing. Without the sex drive and the lust you have as a man, plus the downsides of womens reproductive system and the fact that you're physically weaker than virtually all men, your interest in all those great options might come close to the interest real women express.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 04:23 PM
3

Damn! I'm definitely missing out on something big here!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 03:27 PM
6

We can also just not date and stay single. That's choosing better and still not dating people we're not interested in. Would you be okay with that? Probably not if you think we should be "open minded" and give unchosen guys a chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 01:25 AM
6

I’ve never met a man that needed the reminder tbh. Then you've never met my ex. "BuT I aM NoT sCaReD" after I told him he shouldn't throw out some smartass comment to a stranger who yelled something at him. The kind of stranger that could potentially carry knifes and stab people or wait for you with his 15 friends and family members to beat you up. Another time, we were at the entrance of a movie theater waiting for someone to pick us back up. A group of young guys (8 or so) came in and started …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 10:55 PM
3

You have to wonder what kind of company these men are keeping, or if the only interaction with women they get is with sex workers trying to make money. I'm wondering about that with every single post on this sub. Sure, I'm not in the US (Western Europe), maybe there are some differences, but still. Don't these guys know ANY normal women, AT ALL? People like their hairdresser or neighbours or family members or so? When they're throwing around the most idiotic generalizations, I feel like I'm livi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 04:13 AM
13

100% agree with this. I don't even know anyone who's openly promiscuous so I've never seen any of my friends date any Chads. Still, I'm very picky. I'd rather be alone than be in a bad or even a mediocre relationship. It's great or it's nothing, and I don't mind being single if great isn't available.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:25 PM
3

Seriously, you idiots and your sex obsession, it's tiring. That's all you have to offer it seems... Boring! Sex is not that important to a lot of women. It's yourself you are serving with "sex", not us. I would never date someone just because I want sex. WTF? And no, I don't do casual shit. No relationship is no sex for me. And no, I'm not asexual either, but I can turn that desire off quite easily when there's no one worthy to have sex with.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 02:23 PM
3

Well, I think it's only fair if women can opt out of being a parent by aborting, which I support 100% btw, the father should have that option as well. It's a little too easy to have all the rights to decide for yourself but then force someone else to be a parent/demand money of them if you one sidedly decide to keep the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 03:50 AM
3

Oh I see. I would get behind that tbh, as long as it's obvious that the guy in question did not mislead her or anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 03:37 AM
1

What do you mean by men's reproductive rights? I mean, what does that entail?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 03:21 AM
6

I mean how attracted does “attracted” need to be? For me personally, a lot more than "I want to stick my dick in you". Men like sex. A man wanting to have sex with a woman is absolutely nothing special. Doing "nice things" for your wife is... normal? It's your life partner. Wanting to do nice things sounds like the absolute basics to me. I do nice things for friends, if I wouldn't even want to do nice things for a spouse, why on earth would I be with them? If this is all men have to offer I'm st…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 06:28 PM
7

So many men in these comments confirming why it's a great choice to just stay single and don't bother dating or marrying them, lol. Unless you want kids really badly and need a sperm donor. Thanks for being honest about it though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 01:57 PM
4

There are huge cultural differences between these countries alone, and the vast majority of people on Reddit are American. So, what do you expect?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 12:52 PM
2

In modern society you'll probably need some kind of income to survive, unless you're already rich and don't need any income, which is why I said "most of us have to work". Who said anyone is entitled to a job?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 03:57 AM
1

That's such a bullshit comparison. A better comparison would be, you buy a car knowing perfectly well what options it has and then complain about the lack of features. Don't buy the fucking car then. Also, you don't have to be in a relationship to survive, but most of us have to work to be able to survive. Small difference there.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 03:36 AM
14

Then they should also stop complaining how these women don't want or don't do certain things. It's usually sexual when these comments come up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 11:58 PM
2

I'm from western Europe and I've never heard of this shit :') I wouldn't have wanted any kind of party either. There's absolutely nothing to celebrate about menstruating.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 07:56 PM
5

And its a very common trope that men also dump their highschool girlfriends once they realize they have all these options at college or after completing basic or at their jobs. It's not only a trope, I literally know a guy who did this. He went to Brazil (we live in Europe) to study and dumped his GF because he wanted to be free to have sex with girls while he was away. (Yes, he just blatantly told her.) After he came back, he wanted her to take him back :')
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 11:38 PM
0

What a bunch of crap :') I must be some kind of unicorn then, lol!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 07:59 PM
–

I think all vaginas and penises are ugly... If we didn't have hormones, no one would want to touch either. One is a wet, fleshy hole, the other looks like a crooked, fleshy mushroom with a disproportionately big stem. What's pretty about either?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:13 PM
5

We need to encourage women to pursue weak males like how society is normalising same sex marriages and so on. There's a difference between normalizing something that people want and actively encouraging people to do something they do not want. Normalizing same sex marriages has nothing to do with the people IN the marriages (they want to marry) but the morons in society who don't want to accept that idea and think they should have a say in other peoples private lifes. What you're proposing is en…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 04:17 AM
2

I say: "You think the boring, unattractive man had equal amounts of attention and options as the funny, handsome one?" You say: "Yes because they both were forced to pick one woman." I argue, it's not because the desirable men are taken of the market that the undesirable men automatically "inherit" the attention and desire of the leftover women. If you can't have what you want, you usually try to pick and choose the least shitty leftover option. You don't usually want all the leftover options, u…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 04:15 PM
2

You're constantly grabbing back to modern times with all the moronic assumptions that go with it and it's annoying. Last time, it's not because you had to marry and you usually married local dudes, that these dudes could pick and choose anyone they wanted. As far as I know, that's what "having options" means.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 04:06 PM
2

Sure, but they couldn't afford to fool around with guys who wouldn't take them seriously or go steady with them. The risk to reputation, the risk of pregnancy, and the societal pressure to get married young all contributed to why women wouldn't waste their time chasing men that don't want them, because they couldn't afford to do that then. Indeed. That doesn't mean "average dudes had options". Quite on the contrary. In such a society it's paramount to vet extensively and be very thoughtful about…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 03:26 PM
2

Yes because they both were forced to pick one woman. It's not because you're being picked as a man in such a situation, that you are wanted. Logically speaking, if the best of whatever you need is of the market, and the leftovers are a fairly homogenous group, you're going to try and pick the least shit option of what's left. Realistically, no, the women who weren't picked by the desirable guys didn't want literally any random one of the leftover group. That's such a strange assumption to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 03:17 PM
6

Why would the average guy have more options? People aren't born equal today and they weren't born equal back then. If anything, communities were smaller so your dating pool was a lot smaller too. You don't think people preferred certain potential spouses over others? You think the boring, unattractive man had equal amounts of attention and options as the funny, handsome one? The average man just asked a lot of different girls and married the one who said yes. That's not having options. They just…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 12:12 PM
21

They are so fucking delusional about the past, it's unreal. This!!! My word! None of these men have ever touched a history book in their life. Every time again I'm astounded by how insanely uneducated these guys are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:25 PM
12

Because you didn't have a huge amount of options (communities were a lot smaller) and society pressured you to marry young and start a life with a wife and kids. You didn't marry for love most of the time, you married for convenience and to have children. No one cared if you liked your spouse, let alone loved them. Usually, parents and other family members had a say in this too, especially when money and/or status was involved. Do you honestly believe that a lawyers son was allowed to marry a fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 10:48 PM
38

You're essentially telling them that women are capable of feigning love for an entire marriage and having a whole ass family with a dude they don't really love for some perceived benefit. You're a moron if you believe that the men didn't know this. It was taboo to talk about it so they didn't necessarily tell their kids, let alone their grandchildren, but that doesn't mean the couple didn't know there wasn't any love between them. It's their moronic grandkids who think because grandma and grandp…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 08:17 PM
5

To be honest, I wouldn't date a single dad either, regardless of why he's single.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 01:38 PM
1

You're just ignoring we don't want a whole lot of those options. Men who only offer a dick and something THEY consider a fun time, are of absolutely zero value to me. It's offering someone something they have zero interest in, then complain this person doesn't feel privileged because they were offered something useless. Do we have more options than men for relationships too? Probably, but that wasn't what I was initially responding to.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:29 PM
1

You would be surprised... It's quite obvious men are so obsessed with their own sexuality, they cannot phathom bad, casual crap means absolutely nothing to a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:08 PM
–

Well, that's just what happened. People (men and women) were "forced" to marry because of laws and societal norms. A lot of these people didn't really want to marry or were not allowed to marry the man/woman of their choice. I think most women still want to find a life partner these days, for the same reasons you do, but they're fine staying single if they can't find the right one. Now they can make this choice. Our grandmothers could not.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 10:47 PM
9

Traditionally, everyone was brainwashed, or at least socially forced. We're mostly talking about womens POV on this sub, but men were also forced into specific roles and expectations. Not only women had to marry men they didn't want, it happened the other way around as well. People in general had very controlled lives. Your parents and community usually decided (or tried to) what your life was gonna be like, strongly influenced by religion which still had a lot of power at the time. In my countr…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 03:10 PM
3

I'm genuinely laughing at that last part :'D In my experience, it's true though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 12:26 AM
19

I wouldn't date either of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 01:38 PM
2

That's not the kind of stuff I'm talking about. I'm talking about claims that are verifiably wrong, like laws, not subjective dating standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:27 PM
2

What standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:05 PM
7

As a European, it annoys me to no end when European guys take American talking points they heard in these manosphere spaces and throw them around in a European setting, while the laws and cultures are completely different. They'll go on huge rants about divorce and money and kids and I'm like: "That's not how things work here... Wtf are you talking about?" If you call them out, they get nasty. I had one once who started tagging me in all kinds of (American) manosphere videos on FB :') At least I…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 11:30 PM
1

You can't influence how a child is treated unless you take custody of said kid. If he doesn't, just like the mother doesn't by putting it up for adoption, there's zero influence on the treatment that child gets. The mother has the final say in this situation. Even if the father would want to abort the child, he can't. It's not in his body and it's not he who has to deal with potential consequences. He literally can't make the decision for her. That does mean though, he can't be held accountable …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:14 PM
1

But the father can't decide if the kid is born or not. Only the mother can.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:30 PM
1

Well, you are getting rid of something that could possibly be a life, although you're doing it at a point when the fetus doesn't have any form of consciousness and can't survive outside of the womb anyway. I don't know any other term or concept that comes close to what a mercy killing is. (I'm not a native English speaker.) You're getting rid of the "baby" because you know it's better for them not to be born. Of course, I do not mean (legalised) euthanasia. If a child has a shitty life that is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:16 PM
2

I agree with this. Every time, conservatives bring up adoption as if it's this great solution if you really don't want the kid. "As long as it's alive", 'cause for some reason they believe being alive is great in and of itself, no matter how shit your life truly is. I on the other hand, think about abortions as mercy killings (it's better to be dead than to have an awful life) and think people who have these babies out of principle and then dump them into a system where they have no friggin idea…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 01:39 AM
2

Same here. I wouldn't want to do anything intimate with a guy I don't like on a deeper level. If I do like the guy on a deeper level but to him it's just a hookup, I'd ruin myself mentally by putting myself in such a situation. So either way, no hookups.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 12:45 AM
5

This! Some women just like sex because sex, some don't. I don't. Never have. Zero interest, no matter how "appealing" the casual sex might look.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 12:35 AM
1

How should I know? I'm not all women, am I? Also, I never said I "don't listen to my brains". What I can't do is literally date a guy just because he looks like a good fit on paper. That doesn't mean I'm just mindlessly jumping into random relationships without thinking because "feelings". I do need the feelings to be able to even have a relationship though. There's two filters going on: the rational and the emotional. Not only one. And it's the emotional that's way harder to get through than th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 01:32 PM
1

When do they develop these types? Usually when you start to have an interest in the opposite sex, so probably at the beginning of puberty. Why did you develop your type? Good question. I have no idea. There is no real "why", there is no logical reason. You just notice that you like certain guys and you don't like other guys. Do you feel having a type limits your ability to find a good partner? Yup! It would be way easier to just rationally decide who the best partner would be instead of being de…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 09:09 PM
3

I have never stopped liking what I liked, no matter where I was or who I was with. When you look at all the guys I ever actively considered dating or actively dated (definitely NOT 20%), there are similarities among them. They are the "same-ish type". That type hasn't changed in more than 20 years so I don't see why it would change if this kind of guy disappeared. I'd just find all guys meh. I don't date meh.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:28 PM
4

No because you're throwing around some random talking points that are part of a WAY bigger picture that you're ignoring completely and I don't think this is the place for such a discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 10:48 PM
6

Lol, sure. I think you're a little naive and gullible, but I won't have this discussion with you right now. Believe whatever you want, I'm not having kids for anyone else but myself with someone I choose. So to get back to your initial point, no, "the good of society" is no motivation at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 10:42 PM
8

Prosperous and egalitarian? Have you read any newspapers lately? Apart from that, for the past 20 years society has proven they don't give a shit about me. I don't owe this society anything. So no, I'm not gonna ruin my life having kids with some random idiot I can barely stand and literally throw away my own happiness and sanity to "save" anything. If our overlords decide sharia law will be installed, they'll make it happen. Me throwing in some kids won't change that. It'll only make my persona…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 10:25 PM
7

Lol, no, it's not. If society is only good if women give up their entire lives to raise kids they don't with men they don't want, then fuck society.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 09:57 PM
3

You're complaining about a biological reality being "unfair". That's moronic! Men want to fuck women more than women want to fuck men. That's not some conscious decision women make, we're just not as sexually driven as men are. This makes dating and having sex a lot more important to men than to women. That's where your "unfairness" comes from. Blame your own biology instead of women. Imagine women complaining about the fact that we have periods and men don't, as if it's something that should be…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 04:20 AM
6

Nah, the inevitable outcome of a society where (almost) everyone is (extremely) addicted to technology and living life through schreens. This is creating people who don't know how to be functional humans. We're a social species, by nature, and a growing number of people don't know how to socialize and interact with others... That's concerning.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 03:37 AM
4

It's crazy (and maybe a little scary) how many people have difficulties being a decent human being. "Why can't I insult person x? I honestly think he's ugly AF! I can't be my true self around here!"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 09:42 PM
3

To be very honest, I sincerely hope he doesn't have succes in dating at all, ever. If he finds a girl who actually stays with him and "tolerates" him, chances are high he'll destroy her completely with his toxic asshole behavior. No one deserves that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 09:37 PM
–

Probably? I don't even know that many men who are considered attractive by a majority of women. Those guys are rare in my opinion. So it's probably unattainable if you're not one of them by genetics. Also, being very handsome when you're younger doesn't mean you'll stay that way forever. Some guys I knew who were attractive when they were teenagers ended up being not so attractive when they got older. Sometimes it's the other way around as well. Average guys with good genes might be more handsom…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 01:55 AM
–

Is it true that you find most men your age ugly? No. I'm not actively attracted to most men my age, that's not the same as "I find most men ugly". I don't fall in love easily and most men I do like have similar features. That doesn't mean other men are ugly, they're just not my type. When you say average, not noteworthy, indifferent, could those guys actually become attractive or is it determined by genetics way too much in your opinion? Maybe if they go through some kind of glow-up or they happ…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 01:41 AM
–

Some people (mind, "people", not "women") date very strategically without any feelings or emotions connected to the partner, because they're very opportunistic and/or because they don't care about love and feelings. That's a specific subset of people, not just one gender and definitely not one gender as a whole. I don't play games, I don't actively rank man, I don't have back-up lists and I couldn't care less about your stupid money and status. I have never felt any regret about any of the guys …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 02:19 PM
12

Anything sexual comes after being actively interested and attracted, not before. I have to have feelings for the guy. And for those who dont what keeps it from going there? For me, sex is linked to love and connection. That's also why I don't do meaningless casual shit. I don't love sex for sex, sex is the extension and expression of love and genuine connection.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 06:31 PM
0

Usually the fathers name, but where I live (Belgium) you can now choose: dads name, moms name, combination of both. I personally would probably choose my husbands name if I ever had kids. Not because I think he's more important, but it's easier when you're interested in genealogy, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 09:46 PM
3

It's interesting to read this. In my country it's not really common to actually, legally change your last name. You can use another name in some unofficial situation (like making a reservation in a restaurant or something), but legal stuff is always in your own name. It's crazy to see what such a change means in a practical sense for women in the US for instance.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 09:36 PM
2

Do you think we're lying about this? I honestly don't care. Is your first reaction to feel hurt by this, and try to prove it wrong, or some other reaction? My reaction is that I am not interested in the kind of man who says these things anyway. I'm not losing anything, so why should I feel hurt by this claim or want to prove it wrong? Prove it wrong how anyway? By dating such a guy "to show him that not all women are like that"? Lol, no thanks. Do you not believe us here either? As I stated abov…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 10:29 PM
10

When I look around this sub, at least part of the toxic guys can't find anyone who wants them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 03:15 AM
5

That's not true. There can be some overlap of course, but it's definitely not 100%. I never fancied any of the boyfriends my friends were with for instance. That also doesn't mean there isn't a certain percentage of guys that will always be skipped, but it's not 90%, that's ridiculous. Even if only 10% of guys is not getting any female attention, that's a lot of people in actual numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:25 PM
2

Men haven't really changed what they like either. They still prefer the slim, pretty girls with fun personalities over overweight, ugly, boring girls. What media promote and what is actually accepted by people is not the same thing. I see lots of pushback on these messages, by men and women. When I was young, this whole "iT'S WhAt oN ThE InSiDe tHaT CoUnTs" was pushed a lot, for men and women btw. It never really caught on either. People kept dating who they liked as a whole, not the guy/girl th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 05:21 PM
2

What do single mothers have to do with anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 04:38 PM
21

And btw women don't agree we all like the same 10% of guys. Ya maybe women like 10% of guys but it's not the same 10% of men This seems to be something they can't wrap their head around, lol! Also, everything that's not them is "the 10%" (or whatever percentage they come up with this time).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 04:13 PM
4

You can't dictate what others should like or care about. I know what I like and find important and no amount of promoting whatever view some moron has on dating will change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 04:07 PM
3

Guys on here cry how society is going to shit because "feminism has turned people away from building strong communities with the nuclear family and conservative values at the center". Those same guys: "I owe you nothing. Give me sex or die!" ROFL! You can't make this shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 04:36 AM
6

I think this is a cultural thing. I've never been paid for on a first date, expected gifts or men throwing money at me (this would probably make me uncomfortable tbh), being "wined and dined" (I don't even want to have a full fletched dinner with a total stranger). I always paid my share for a date. In my opinion, that's normal? But I'm not from the US so maybe that's the difference. I've noticed this "paying for a date"-thing seems more inherent to the culture in the US. Quick sidenote, I'm not…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:10 PM
7

A lot of men aren't really protectors or providers anyway, so basically, men claiming that offer nothing in my opinion. In my country, the vast majority of women provides as well (full SAHM are very rare), and I see more and more men who are too pussy or too moronic to even be able to protect. A lot of people (not only men) are cowards. They don't protect shit. So a guy saying "I provide and protect" tells me "I offer nothing". Usually that means "but I want you to do your woman role and I will …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 03:54 PM
2

I agree 100%! The audacity and entitlement it takes to tell someone they need to do some introspection on their deeply intimate choices is wild. I think it's crazy that LGB originally fought to get rid of the policing of who they could or couldn't be intimate with, and now from that same corner we have people pressuring us to justify why we don't want to have sex with certain guys. It's absolutely insane. It's none of anyone's business why you don't want to date someone. The question shouldn't e…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 09:36 PM
2

I'm not gonna unlearn anything. It's no ones business why I or anyone else doesn't want to date someone. I'm not gonna justify myself for why I reject a guy. I reject him because I don't want him, end of story. I don't care about someone else's opinion on my reasons (or my assumed reasons...). Same goes for friendships btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 04:15 PM
2

I think it's better to feel more and run the risk of getting hurt than being with someone that worships you. Why do you feel that's better?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 01:50 PM
14

The relationship is always the most fun for the person who loves his partner the least, man or woman. That's why you best leave such a relationship as the person who loves the other the most. You'll only get hurt and feel used and disrespected. These aren't healthy relationships at all. Just "fun for the one with the most power".
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 01:16 PM
6

So hot girls are party girls by default with only a few exceptions? Ugly people don't like to party? Is that a genetic condition?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 03:58 PM
1

Yeah and I say no, not usually. Usually means "most of the time". That's not what I've noticed, quite the opposite actually. The women I'm speaking of meant for relationships, not for casual.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 03:35 PM
1

Nah, the women who told me they were attracted to bad boys meant in general, not only for casual sex. It's a type they have.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 03:28 PM
2

I don't want the bad boy type either. Never understood why some women are attracted to such guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 03:06 PM
7

And who decides peoples ranks in this "dating hierarchy"? From what I can gather, RP would think a rich man is high on the hierarchy while I don't give a crap about money and status and would rate him according to his looks and personality only.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 09:26 PM
5

Where are the results of the poll that was done to get these stats?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:51 AM
8

This! I sometimes wonder if the guys on this sub live in some sort of alternate reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:24 AM
2

That has nothing to do with empathy. That is you wanting women to "admit that we have it easy" (which I don't even necessarily agree with). You can see that someone is in a shitty situation and feel genuinely bad for them without having to say anything about your own or admit to some sort of fault or mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 02:13 AM
2

I don't think I ever told anyone to lower their standards. In my opinion, people can have any standards they want. That doesn't mean you'll actually get what you want though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:21 PM
18

I think a lot of women do empathize with men's dating struggles. When I hear some of these stories, especially from men who never got the chance to date anyone and suffer because they feel incredibly lonely, I genuinely feel sad for those men. Issues start when men (in)directly say they want women to solve their dating struggles, for example "women should lower their standards (so I can date them/have sex with them)". That's where you lose us.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 03:43 AM
1

What certain treatment do men want from women? I'm genuinely curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 02:23 AM
–

"Do woman care how many Partners a Men had before?" Yes, I do. No players, no manwhores, men who slept with too many women for whatever reason are a no. Just something reasonable please. Would I date a virgin? Depends. Why is he still a virgin? If he's deeply religious or very obviously no dating material, no, I wouldn't date him.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 10:20 PM
1

I know absolutely no one who aims for some top level percentage of guys, but to be frank, believe whatever you want. And feel miserable about it too. If you all love your ridiculous generalizations so much and therefore believe every woman in every relationship is settling for some dude she secretely finds ugly and unattractive because she can't date whatever top percentage of guys you morons come up with (while using criteria you invented yourself, lol), you do you. I really don't care. I think…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 04:55 AM
2

I'm talking about a lot more realistic situations with normal people, not these insta model type guys, who are quite rare anyway. If all women were only after such guys, no one would be in relationships. And for what it's worth, I don't want an over 6 ft guy with visible abs. The obsession with height and muscle on this sub is tiring and getting old.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 04:10 AM
5

Omg, this! At one point there was such a woman who participated in a dating show in my country. All other contestants knew she was bad news, but the guy? Nope! She played him like a fiddle. The other girls were like: "HOW do you not see this?" I think the problem is that shitty people behave differently towards their "targets" than towards peers. The peers think it's all super obvious while the target is getting manipulated and has no clue. That's why some dudes on here seem to think it must be …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 09:31 PM
3

Functionally, that leads to the exact same outcome: a very small percentage of men are considered acceptable. For me personally, not for women in general. They each have their own set of men they like. The reason people bring this up isn’t to complain that women aren’t attracted to everyone. Nobody expects that. The point is that when a large portion of women filter out the majority of men for a long list of preferences, the math just stops working. A lot of perfectly normal men end up with no o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 01:22 PM
6

It's not an attempt to sanitize anything, it's true. 80/20 specifically claims "80% of women only want to date the top 20% of men", so only the hottest, richest, etc. men in society. There's a difference between finding the majority of men unattractive and wanting to date the top 20% of men specifically. Apart from the 80/20 crap, I think it's quite insane to complain about women not being actively attracted to more than 50% of the male population.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 04:15 AM
7

The problem is you guys don't understand that someone doesn't have to want the top 20% of men to still find the majority of men that are available to them unattractive. I don't date "out of my league". Men who are too hot/too rich/whatever they think is worth more than what I have to offer, are "greyed out" so to speak. I don't see them as options and they are not what I'm looking for. So top whatever percent of men is literally not in my dating pool. In the pool that's left, there's a shitload …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 01:55 AM
12

These morons seem to forget that the now 30+ year old woman they so despise, was once a 20 year old girl and she quite obviously never married the 40 year old dude. There's zero logic in these arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 09:05 PM
7

You only believe that if you think genuine chemistry can be changed through rational thinking. It can't, that's my point. Most people don't choose who they are attracted to and develop feelings for. Telling them they should try and feel something for someone because they sound good on paper, is nonsensical and doesn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 03:29 AM
13

What aspect of "attraction" is unclear to you? Choosing a partner isn't just some rational process. If it was, no woman would choose bad/boring/shitty/deadbeat men or stay with them. It has nothing to do with hypergamy. Outsiders might say things like "this or that person would be good for you", but first of all, they only see one side of you/their interpretation of you and the vast majority of people don't know you well enough to make such a statement. Second, if there's zero chemistry or spark…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 10:25 PM
4

I genuinely think a lot of people here are incapable of love, or have blocked it off entirely. Some don't seem to know the difference between lust and love and confuse the two. It's... pretty sad tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 10:38 PM
3

What surely would have?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 02:11 AM
8

In my opinion, you just defined meaningless yourself. You feel that the literal activity of "having sex" is meaningful to you personally, it has nothing to do with the person you're doing it with, outside of the amount of lust you have for said person at that moment (which can be reduced to "I want to stick my dick in her"). That's the definition of meaningless sex to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 10:16 PM
5

I stumbled upon this sub because I was bombarded with manosphere/red pill/incel content on Facebook and wondered how big the problem actually was. I know that Facebook is used to influence (groups of) people and pushes towards extremist views and narratives, so I wanted to know how many men actually believed in these mysogynistic talking points. Well... Apparently, it wasn't just extremist Facebook propaganda. And I share the same concerns. I don't believe EVERY man thinks like the guys on here,…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 05:45 PM
17

Same here! I never really hated men. There are good and bad people in this world and they can be either gender. Until I came here and saw the toxicity, the vitriol, the women hating, the bizarre focus on sex and sex only, the ridiculous generalizations about women, etc. Now I'm getting extremely close to actual misandry and my interest in dating any men has virtually plummeted to zero.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 03:55 PM
–

Ignore that idiot! I share your fear and I've seen the same thing happen. You're not crazy. He's trying to downplay your experience because it makes men look bad and diminishes the chances of incels finding someone even more. If women don't dare to take a chance with men, the dating pool becomes smaller and they don't want that. Plain and simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 02:50 PM
4

This sums this sub up so incredibly well. As a woman, if you read all the opinions and statements of the men here and believe them, there is absolutely no incentive at all to date any guy ever. Every relationship is a means to sex apparently and every guy wants to fuck the best he can get at any given time. Everything is reduced to sex and materialistic crap like money and status and women are idiots for expecting anything more apparently. Why on earth should any woman NOT take this as the trans…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:29 PM
0

No, I did not misunderstand the post. I can read. But in a practical sense, this approach doesn't make sense. You should focus on guys that have traits you don't mind but others don't like or avoid, but if I don't care about these traits, these guys are already in my dating pool. So what's the idea here? Focus solely on guys with these traits? That's stupid. That limits my chances of finding someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 09:33 PM
2

I don't have to re-read anything. The whole idea is just stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 07:32 PM
5

But, why would anyone care about traits OTHERS don't like in a partner if they themselves are not bothered by these traits? Maybe I'm too straight forward for this nonsense but if I'm not botherd by trait x, why would I refuse to date a guy because of trait x? That makes absolutely no sense at all x)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 12:48 PM
1

Stupid? Why? Why should we care how "easy" it is for a random idiot to get laid often? This is so ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 03:38 AM
1

Exactly! Usually accompanied with "I am not afraid of it. I don't care."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 03:46 PM
4

I noticed this in real life too. Every time a guy acts like a problem can be easily fixed, their solutions are just shit or no real solutions at all. They usually just ignore parts of the problem and/or the people involved and their personalities. Telling someone who's struggling with saying "no" to colleagues at work isn't helped with "Just say no when they ask x or y". If it was that easy, nobody had any problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 03:22 PM
1

I can get the "he is too nice" in certain circumstances. Some people act nice but aren't actually nice. They fake being nice which might come of as "too nice". Or when a guy seems to lack a backbone and just agrees with everything the person in front of him says. That could be considered "too nice" in my opinion. If he's just being respectful, that's not "too nice". That's just being a decent person. The other two examples are crazy...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 03:00 PM
3

Can you give some examples of these "dumb reasons"?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 02:32 PM
2

Pretending? Lol! I'm rejecting them by default. One of the first things I try to find out is their body count. Men tend to lie about it though. They know most women don't want high body count men, unless they're into casual sex themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 03:22 AM
1

In that case, Western society should bow down to the Chinese, Thai, etc. They are literally making everything you're using on a day to day basis. Without them you'd be sitting on your butt in the dirt. You were talking about running naked in the woods. People in these countries are making ALL your clothes, and before them women did. If not for women, men would've been running naked in woods for hunderds of years. Civilization wasn't built by one gender or one group of people. You're an imbecile …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 12:13 AM
3

Yeah it's insane. None of them has any access to history books so it seems. The stupid and completely incorrect claims being made on this sub are astounding! "WoMeN aLwaYs StaYeD hOmE wItH ThE kiDs BeForE fEmIniSm." Women AND kids were working in factories in the 1700s and 1800s. The first child labour laws in my country date from 1889, imagine. And that's only a tiny fraction of history.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 10:44 PM
2

You said "men built society" is a response to women saying they hate all men. I see men claim that bullshit on here all the time while I never see women on here say they hate all men or all men should be killed. Your argument is quite obviously wrong. Men say this because they're frustrated and feel women are owed them whatever, usually relationships and sex, even if they themselves never did anything useful in their lives. It's quite pathetic actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 10:22 PM
1

I've never seen women say that on this sub and even after all the nonsense and vitriol I've seen posted here, I personally still don't think that. I know it's only a specific subset of guys who behave like this and genuinely believe those things.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 09:39 PM
2

Sorry to break it to you but none of the guys who say such awful things about women come off as good men with good hearts at all and I would never consider dating any of them. Most guys on here seem terribly superficial and boring at best, extremely toxic with very shitty personalities at worst. Neither is attractive or worth considering.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 03:56 AM
6

This 100%. To be honest, this sub did teach me how to recognize red pill/black pill/manosphere/incel rethoric better and I will absolutely filter heavily on this in the future. And on how sex oriented men are. I think women looking for serious relationships already were filtering out "I only want you for sex"-men, but this sub highlighted for me how important it is to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 03:26 AM
18

When the vast majority of men never in their lives did any of the jobs they're (indirectly) referring to, are equally reliant on infrastructure and services as women and woud be completely useless if anything serious ever happened. And for some reason they also think women can't do farming... Wtf.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 12:19 AM
1

If that's the only side of women you see, you either have not a lot to offer yourself (except for a dick), or you will always reduce a woman to her puss no matter who she is as a person. Not because the woman doesn't know she's worth more than that, but because you think any other quality she has is unimportant or irrelevant. You don't really sound like a catch yourself, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 03:02 PM
-1

If you only meet women who you feel have no value besides being your sex doll, that sounds like a you problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 01:18 AM
-1

I don't crave sex enough to want to be a guys breathing sex doll. If that's all you have to offer, no thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 10:22 AM
2

I would never say I understand men having a dry streak since it's quite obvious men experience sex so differently. (And maybe being alone, but I'm not sure about that.) I'd rather be alone and sexless for the rest of my life than be in a shitty relationship with someone I don't like or am not attracted to. "BuT YoU CaN HaVe CaSuAl SeX." I have zero interest in casual nonsense. That means being single is automatically a dry streak. Do I like being single? No, but it's better than the alternative …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 07:52 AM
–

I don't think making "crass jokes" or "sex jokes" is necessarily masculine. I'm a woman and me and my friend group make crass jokes too. We just don't do it in places where other people might not appreciate such jokes. That's called being a grownup and knowing you can't behave like "yourself" in every setting.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 04:22 PM
–

And what is a typically masculine way then? That's a genuine question. I don't see how "normal masculine behaviour" would be wrong in a book club setting.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 03:10 AM
2

No worries, I didn't take it as criticism :) And I agree with the rest of your comment. OP is working/studying 14 to 16h a day and thinks it's doable to squeeze dates/a girlfriend in somewhere. If only he had money! ROFL!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 04:14 PM
8

The huge debt thing is an American issue. OP is using euros, so he's probably not in neck-deep debt for med school. I have two degrees, zero debt and I'm not rich at all. Tuition in my country is about € 1000 a year, not something most people go in debt for. Just pointing this out as a sidenote.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 02:59 AM
10

He doesn't have time to go see a movie or get dinner. He's spending 16 hours on working and studying each day and wants to squeeze in a date/girlfriend somewhere. I don't see how.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 01:43 AM
3

That's not what I said. I said ON HERE. OP is posting in PPD and here I see more extreme views from women as a response and pushback to the extremist ideas of the men. If OP reads the threads on here, I can imagine his OP is his takeaway. Extreme ideas usually form in spaces where debate is not taking place. That's one of the characteristics of extremist thinking. That's why echo chambers are a problem. People are constantly affirming each other, even when their ideas or opinions are shit and ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 06:45 PM
2

Right. And I'm arguing that's very damaging to people who feel/are vulnurable. It's literally in the first sentence in my very first post.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 05:34 PM
4

Well, then keep yelling extremist nonsense towards each other and hope someone will eventually listen to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 05:27 PM
6

There is always place for nuance in debate, especially when it comes to relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 04:54 PM
3

What has responding to extremism with more extreme stances to do with not being able to think indepentently? Extremism triggers more extreme pushback, that's it. In this case it's men vs women but you see the exact same thing in political spaces for instance. No, it's virtually all women's only spaces. So what are you implying here?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 04:51 PM
6

I think you switched misogyny with misandry tbh, but yes, some female spaces do the same thing but the focus is men instead of women. These are equally extreme views and one of the reasons why I don't call myself a modern feminist. That's why I made my argument a little broader after the part you quote. If someone starts an argument or debate with zero nuance and zero room for nuance, you'll end up with a lot of extreme rethoric. That's what's happening in these spaces. This was a more general t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 04:10 PM
17

For a guy who's struggling, these kind of subs are the worst to get on in my opinion. Because the arguments and claims that are made by men on here are so extreme, you get very extreme views from women in return. That's what I notice at least. If someone starts an argument or debate with zero nuance and zero room for nuance, you'll end up with a lot of extreme rethoric. That's what's happening in these spaces. I know no one, absolutely NO ONE, outside of subs or social media pages like these, wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 07:17 AM
2

​If you view sex as something you "surrender" in exchange for a boyfriend title, don't be surprised when men get bored and find someone who actually enjoys their own sexuality. You realize this is the intention? Women who wait want to weed out the quick-fuck-guys who aren't interested in real commitment at all, but just want their fun. Why should I give myself to someone like that? Hop along if you want immediate access to a woman. I'm not the one for you. The end.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 04:26 AM
8

If you don’t sleep with a man on the first date, what does that usually mean? It means that I'm not drunk and have not been drugged, which is a good thing, for me at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 01:12 AM
–

At this point I expect anything from this sub, so, well... But, no, I wouldn't settle for a donkey. If a guy really wanted a donkey, we can look into buying one (or two) if he wants, but it won't replace the horses.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 04:13 PM
–

To date or to have instead of the horse?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 09:09 AM
–

Thank you!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 02:16 AM
–

As a horse girl who wants horses at home at some point, my hobby is so ridiculously demanding that I can't really complain about any hobby a potential partner would have, lol. So none that I can come up with at the moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 02:07 AM
–

Read my other reply 'cause you very obviously didn't bother the first time. Or just do artificial insemination It's prohibited to use this method to choose your babies gender in the EU so no solution at all. We're back to "only a handful of women are allowed to have children".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 07:32 PM
–

So we'll kill all the male babies after they've been born then?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 07:13 PM
–

The fact that you can't grasp how stupid this sounds is... hilarious, worrying and crazy at the same time. Not in the least because tall women don't necessarily have tall sons and short women don't necessarily have short sons. Also, no one in their right mind advocates for the abortion of healthy, wanted babies. In a lot of countries you wouldn't even be able to abort such a baby. Abortion is allowed up until a certain week and the gender can only be determined around the 20th week, which is aft…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 01:34 PM
–

Because it's insane. The fact that I need to point this out is also insane. You're all so caught up in your own frustrations, that your ideas about anything with regard to women and relationships are completely detached from reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 01:07 PM
1

So, wait, you think Van Gogh wasn't happy because he was short and women didn't want to date him?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 07:04 AM
–

You think? My word... When you think you've heard it all, OP comes along.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 06:35 AM
2

Children too. I'm from (Western) Europe and in late 1800s/early 1900s children were working in the textile factories, same as women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 03:40 AM
2

There was a worse one from the indoor cycling during the olympics. A guy held up his kid and hid behind it when one of the cyclists landed IN the public. That would be instant divorce if I was the wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 01:56 AM
11

I'm not saying you're lying, I'm saying you're basing your description in your OP on something that's not real. You are making up scenarios in your head about hook-ups and FWB that aren't based on any form of experience, only on porn and stories from others (who might be lying to you, exaggerating their actual experiences and leaving out all instances where shit didn't go as planned/wasn't impressive at all). Then you generalize this to "all women are having these kind of experiences when they'r…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:43 AM
11

Your description has no base in reality, plain and simple. It's blatantly obvious you've never had sex in your life and are basing your whole OP on womens behaviour in porn. I'm gonna tell you a secret. Men are the primary consumers when it comes to porn. That means porn is catered to mens fantasies and what they think hot sex is. Women don't behave like porn actrices in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:13 AM
19

Look, I don't need to give you more descriptors. You know wtf I'm talking about. Porn. You're talking about porn. I just read a script for a porn video (or a series maybe).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 04:39 AM
–

I think the biggest difference compared to my own country is that, once settled (which can be in a different location than where you're originally from), people don't move around all the time. When you decide on a location to live and raise children, you stay there or at least in the same area. So the whole 'would you move for your partners carreer' isn't really on the table. Same goes for alimony. I've only known one case where the woman was awarded alimony after a divorce. All of this changes …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 05:01 PM
6

That's probably how YOU feel. You think being lonely is worse than being in a meh-ish relationship with someone you deem "good enough". Not everyone is like that. People make these choices based on how they know what works for them personally. I would be an awful partner to someone I don't really like. For me it's a wholehearted "yes" or a very clear "no". There's no "maybe" or "good enough". People who struggle with being alone probably can't fathom others deliberately choosing to be single, ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 05:03 AM
8

Oh dear god. 99,999% of men doesn't come close to someone like Henry. Sure, some celebs and probably a few random guys can attract (younger) women purely based on looks even when they're older, but that's a tiny minority. I'm pretty sure no one on this sub qualifies, lol. And for what it's worth, although Henry is aging quite well, I found him the most attractive in his late 20s, so there's that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 12:45 AM
–

not once i've seen them say, "yea he's attractive and women better looking than me might be interested in him i'll leave him for those" As if any man would ever say this if it was about a woman! My word!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 02:27 AM
7

Probably because at least part of the men here are 'nice guys' themselves. The ridiculous generalizations, the vitriol and the agression towards women you see in this sub, is very on par with what I've seen from nice guy posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:22 AM
1

Who on earth would rate Henry Cavill a 9, on a scale from 1 to 10 I assume. If Henry isn't even a 10, I don't know who is :')
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 03:44 AM
2

If they can? If they are offered an excuse, like in most cases now claiming they want "a traditional relationship" and therefore the woman has to do all the work in the home? 100%! It has nothing to do with not knowing or understanding. You have to be an absolute moron to not "understand" that a woman who has worked similar hours to you will need help with work in the home. Still, in my parents generation (now in their sixties), the men left the domestic work for the women. Not all of them, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 05:00 PM
2

Well, that probably is his problem :')
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:08 AM
3

I know what I saw when I was younger and not much is going to convince me that the young men were not “brainwashed” by this dynamic. How else do you explain all of the complaints that today’s younger women have about men ant their apparent reticence to do domestic work when they have a female partner present? I think it's lazyness, not brainwashing. It's not "I was taught a woman should do this and I don't know any better", it's "these tasks are boring and stupid and I don't want to do them so I…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 11:46 PM
–

Same in my country. I counted them for this thread. 10 years, 37 marriages, 27 divorces and current season isn't going really well so I expect 41 marriages and about 30 divorces by the end of this year. And because this is TV, a shitload of people that might have some serious disadvantages in their life aren't even considered! (People with children or serious disabilities for instance are consistently excluded in the tv show. Everyone is fairly average to good looking too.)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 02:52 PM
4

I agree wholeheartedly, but I have noticed that a lot of cheaters hate it when their partner cheats. To be openly poly, you have to accept your partner having other partners as well and a lot of non-monogamous people don't want that. Plus, it would drastically reduce their dating pool. If they're honest about their intentions, they might not get to date that girl or guy they really want. So they lie to get what they want instead of being upfront, like a decent person.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 07:25 AM
–

A "few" exceptions?! You say "animal species", primates are only a fraction of that. In a lot of mammals, the females raise the babies on their own! Their is no definitive bonding between one male and one female and they don't look after each other. Look at bears or cats. Except for lions, most cats are solitary animals that don't pair up with the other gender except for mating. Male house cats for instance don't bother looking after their offspring at all. The female does it all on her own. And…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 05:02 AM
–

There are a lot of animal species where males and females don't depend on each other at all, except for literal baby making. Even worse, some animal species don't even bother raising their own kids, lol!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 02:45 AM
–

Good for you that you're so happy, but I wasn't talking about YOU specifically. I said "I don't think most of you are there at all!", so unless you're schizophrenic, that's obviously about the men on this sub in general, not only you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 08:31 PM
4

If you're already there, why still make whiny posts and comments on a sub like this to complain how women don't want you? If you're already there, get on with your life and stop complaining. I don't think most of you are there at all!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 02:49 PM
33

This 100%. The only thing they're accomplishing is that I'm now very much leaning towards "I don't want to date any of you at all anymore."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 07:12 AM
15

Some of the comments on here sound ridiculous to me. As a woman, yes I definitely use "leagues", not even consciously but subconsciously, and judging from their behaviour, other women use them too. People saying "leagues don't exist": take the ugliest guy you know, put him next to the hottest celebrity you know and let 1000 people honestly tell you which one of them they find the most attractive. If anyone thinks it's gonna be 50/50, you're delusional. That's what leagues are. If you take these …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 04:51 AM
3

So, you want a hot woman who's only purpose is to f* you and give you status with other men (like a fancy car or an expensive house, maybe you can put her in your garage?) and you're annoyed no one is signing up for that? Gosh, who would have thought!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:07 PM
0

Reading these comments I have the feeling a lot of "womanizers" don't realize how many women are actively avoiding them, which means their perception of women in general might be off more than they know.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 01:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter