~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Why Men Aren’t Returning to Democrats — The Hard TruthSimple. Because dems are significantly more likely to push for better Healthcare Except they don't. At no point have any of them made healthcare better, cheaper, or increased the quality of access. i already have orphans I'm assuming you mean guns, so that doesn't really matter, they're going to come pick them up and throw you in jail for daring to not bow the knee. since i can't buy that from an " undesirable " off the books. If they implemented their ban all guns belief, you wouldn't be able t… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/25 08:50 PM |
| 5 | Why Men Aren’t Returning to Democrats — The Hard Truthi voted obama, bernie, biden....i want affordable healthcare and easy access to firearms So why would you have voted for them? | /r/MensRights | 18/08/25 08:01 PM |
| 1 | A Father's Rights Case is blowing up on TwitterNo he did not? In your other post you literally copied and pasted that he got exactly that. They got equal custody originally and then he did not pay child support so it was overruled. As per your own source, he had paid his child support. It's always funnier when people don't read their own sources. | /r/MensRights | 22/11/24 11:11 PM |
| 1 | A Father's Rights Case is blowing up on TwitterI like how you quoted something that doesn't dispute anything I said. Then you posted a source that indicated he had paid his support. You even included it in your quote. Hilarious. Equal legal custody is when your ex-wife can decide alone in anything other than whether to put your child on hormone therapy? It's like you don't understand that there is a timeline of events. | /r/MensRights | 22/11/24 11:10 PM |
| 1 | A Father's Rights Case is blowing up on TwitterI did not check on what he provided but based on the fact that the judge decided against him The judge didn't decide against him...What makes you think that they did? and there were no appeals this 'evidence' was not really convincing. Notice how it was not a contentious issue on any of the appeals? Your wiki article says the opposite, he lost custody because of this. No, it does not. He just retained the right to having to give his consent for medical stuff. Yes, he retained equal legal custody… | /r/MensRights | 22/11/24 01:13 AM |
| 1 | A Father's Rights Case is blowing up on TwitterOh where he disputed it? Yes and then it was never brought up again. The judge decided against him The judge granted him equal legal custody, so that would also be an incorrect statement on your part. | /r/MensRights | 22/11/24 01:11 AM |
| 3 | A Father's Rights Case is blowing up on TwitterYOU: “In the wiki article, it shows that he showed he made those payments” Yes. Wiki article: “ on August 3, 2021, Brown awarded full custody of the twins to Georgulas, as Younger had "failed to timely make the payments of child support, medical support and interest as ordered".[13]” Ah yes, where you cut off the article because you don't like what the rest says: Georgulas' legal team claimed that Younger, in addition to paying child support late, had refused to carry out court orders including … | /r/MensRights | 21/11/24 03:08 AM |
| 2 | A Father's Rights Case is blowing up on TwitterDude you’ve been smoking too much. Ah yes, the insults after you got proven wrong. The last refuge. You’re quoting my words as evidence against what I wrote in my previous post No, I'm "quoting" you to respond to what you wrote in the post. But let's actually quote you: This is a clear case of the father fucking himself by not paying child support that he could easily afford. That is what you said. In the wiki article, it shows that he showed he made those payments. Even the judge still granted … | /r/MensRights | 21/11/24 02:41 AM |
| 2 | A Father's Rights Case is blowing up on TwitterReally? It doesn’t say You should have read the very next sentence. -According to the ruling, both parents still had to consent to any future hormone therapy, puberty blockers or gender-affirming surgery for their child So it's not what you said. Got it. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/24 01:50 AM |
| 3 | A Father's Rights Case is blowing up on TwitterIt helps if you read the whole thing and not only the part you want. Try the rest of sentence you cut off to pretend you made a correct point. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/24 01:36 AM |
| 2 | A Father's Rights Case is blowing up on Twitter...have you read it? Yes It literally says what he says. That is incorrect. He provided evidence that he paid on time, and that was only one party of the entire story. Even at that time, the court had granted him joint custody in relation to treatment. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/24 01:36 AM |
| 34 | A Father's Rights Case is blowing up on TwitterHe won't because it shows that he is making shit up, so I'll link it for you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Younger%E2%80%93Anne_Georgulas_custody_battle | /r/MensRights | 20/11/24 04:01 AM |
| 17 | A Father's Rights Case is blowing up on TwitterInteresting, because the wikipedia page you want us to go find ourselves doesn't say anything that you said. In fact, it paints the opposite picture. This has nothing to do with child support. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/24 03:59 AM |
| 64 | Justin Roiland Domestic Violence Charges Dismissed, ‘Rick and Morty’ Creator Slams ‘Horrible Lies Reported About Me’This is what is crazy to me. He gets fired for what reason? The company is afraid of pr problems? Look at Johnny Depp. The guy had receipts proving his innocence and he still is having a difficult time getting attached to projects that he was in before. Disney has dropped him entirely. Warner Brothers won't take his calls. His only current project is an independent film and an animated film that he is making a sequel to that isn't tied to any major studio. And he was completely exonerated, not j… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/23 06:30 AM |
| 25 | Justin Roiland Domestic Violence Charges Dismissed, ‘Rick and Morty’ Creator Slams ‘Horrible Lies Reported About Me’Multiple shows, his video game studio, basically every single project he was involved in. His connections are permanently ruined and he is considered untouchable. It's likely he'll never run another creative project again. | /r/MensRights | 20/08/23 06:26 AM |
| 5 | thoughts?That account has been suspended lol | /r/MensRights | 16/01/23 03:11 AM |
| 5 | Child Support IdeaWouldn't most of it be automated? People have a vast over estimation of what can and cannot be automated. If we could automate transactions like this, the entire insurance industry wouldn't hire people to work claims. The reality of it is that because receipts aren't universal, claims aren't standard, and things have nuance, there's no "automation" that can realistically happen. Automation is a handy tool when dealing with tasks that are repetitive and never changing. Hand written forms, non-sta… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/22 04:50 PM |
| 4 | Women Transitions Into A Man And Doesn't Like Being A ManAs for the views of 'skaldish' above. maybe a couple of comments. Testosterone may give 'dumb bastard brain' in terms of risk-taking I mean this is just really someone who is going through puberty late in life. The increases in testosterone are something that you learn to live with and adjust to in your teens. Plus, testosterone levels aren't something you can just slap a number on, everyone responds differently to it, meaning they probably have the wrong dosage and are experiencing ill effects … | /r/MensRights | 19/07/22 02:03 PM |
| 35 | Women Transitions Into A Man And Doesn't Like Being A ManI was on board until the "actual assault" part. Being cold to everyone doesn't decrease your risk of an assault, it just means that you push everyone away. If someone wants to assault you, your reaction to them isn't going to change that. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/22 01:48 PM |
| 0 | Just returned from a 3 day almost perma ban. I’m convinced that they are targeting us here.Ah, the classic retort of someone who has realized he's wrong, but is too stubborn to just say "I was wrong, I'm sorry". edit lol he blocked me. So I'll respond in kind for everyone else here: Ah, the classic retort of someone who beleived they were always right from the beginning and refused to be open to other ideas. I'm open to your idea, but you have yet to try and convince me. You've simply resorted to strawman arguments, insults, and a general talk down attitude rather than address anythin… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 08:26 PM |
| 1 | Just returned from a 3 day almost perma ban. I’m convinced that they are targeting us here.Well, you're just wrong. Not particularly. If they followed thebfirst ammendment, they couldn't ban any speech. Well, this is dishonest because the government can and does ban speech and the first amendment is restricting government. The first amendment hasn't been mentioned here, just the principle of free speech. Secondly, it was called to punish reddit for violating the first amendment Can you quote where I said that? If you look back, it is only you who said anything about punishment. So you… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 07:52 PM |
| 4 | Just returned from a 3 day almost perma ban. I’m convinced that they are targeting us here.It's not reddit's fault people have opinions. I never claimed that it was. This is a terrible strawman to start your argument. You can't punish reddit for other people's mistakes. How am I punishing reddit? Also, if free speech must be allowed on reddit because "laws" then FDS would still be a subreddit. Correct, and while it is a distasteful sub, it should be allowed to exist. Distasteful speech is still free speech. If you open the door to shutting down the people who say things you disagree w… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 06:12 PM |
| 7 | Just returned from a 3 day almost perma ban. I’m convinced that they are targeting us here.I would argue this is true, if the laws weren't sculpted to provide them no liability. Reddit isn't responsible for content posted on their website, and as such gets protections against other people suing them for content posted. With these rights provided to them and protection from liability, they should be following the requirement of free speech. Instead, they get to have zero liability and restrict speech on a whim. If they want to play judge and jury on speech, they shouldn't be protected … | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 05:15 PM |
| 5 | Reddit Blames Recent Shooting On " In*els ". For What Reason? I don't know. Probably Judging Men Based On Their Apperance Again.Someone who knows how and where to buy a gun. Is more likely to be able to commit a mass shooting than someone who doesn't. You have equated ability with desire. This means that most home owners are mass killers with poisons or that most car drivers are murdering people with their cars. The ability to acquire something (especially a gun which does not require more than a google search of gun store and then going to one to buy one) is absurd. The "how" of buying a gun is pointing at one and sayin… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 12:22 PM |
| 0 | Woman throws beer at a man and still gets protected by the guy recording. This video is going viral and everyone is taking the side of the man.He was assaulted. Minor or major, he was assaulted. I agree. If I can't deal with the consequences of my actions, I shouldn't do stupid thing You are part of the problem if you think someone should get away with that Both my opinion, and the law, disagree. You are not granted the right to deliver your own justice. You don't know if he wasn't in danger and the thought process who thinks it's okay to assault someone. It was pretty clear he wasn't after she did it as both of them were separated by … | /r/MensRights | 23/06/22 05:42 AM |
| 0 | Woman throws beer at a man and still gets protected by the guy recording. This video is going viral and everyone is taking the side of the man.So the perpetrator should suffer no consequences? Not even remotely what I said. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/22 05:38 AM |
| 1 | Woman throws beer at a man and still gets protected by the guy recording. This video is going viral and everyone is taking the side of the man.There was already physical violence that occurred. In the broadest legal sense yes. In common terms, no. She was not threatening his life as he was hers. She, the aggressor, should be at most in jail or at least escorted off the property by security or police with a warning. I fully agree as noted in my initial response. The victim should be able to defend himself What defense should be be able to do at this point? Please point out the ongoing harm which he is preventing. The damage is done. His… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/22 05:38 AM |
| 1 | Woman throws beer at a man and still gets protected by the guy recording. This video is going viral and everyone is taking the side of the man.You are confused, otherwise you wouldn't be implying a shove I implied nothing of the sort. It is weird that everyone is trying to shove words into what I said rather than read what I actually said. As far as the law is concerned both of those actions are "simple" assault and battery. "Non-harmful violence" isn't a legal term, on the contrary its a total oxymoron. You're right in that it isn't a legal term. You know what is though? Proportional response. I do not get to pull out a gun and shoot … | /r/MensRights | 23/06/22 05:36 AM |
| 0 | Woman throws beer at a man and still gets protected by the guy recording. This video is going viral and everyone is taking the side of the man.Don't get me wrong, I 100% think that he should hit back, but the biased courts won't think so. Regardless of gender escalating to physical violence over that would land that person in jail. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/22 11:42 PM |
| -2 | Woman throws beer at a man and still gets protected by the guy recording. This video is going viral and everyone is taking the side of the man.The man was assaulted and he shouldn't defend himself? He was in no physical danger - what was he defending himself against? He has the right to hurt, possibly injure or kill her because she threw a beer on him? Ask yourself, if you got mad and threw a beer on someone, should they have the right to physically harm you? If you answer yes, you're part of the problem. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/22 11:41 PM |
| -4 | Woman throws beer at a man and still gets protected by the guy recording. This video is going viral and everyone is taking the side of the man.I am not advocating responding in this situation physically but wanted to point out that beer thrown on you, water thrown on you, being bumped without getting knocked back/down, someone poking you while arguing to make a point(you gotta shape up with a shoulder poke between each word), etc are all examples of "simple" assault and battery and you the victim would be within your right to shove them back. You never....never escalate to harmful physical violence over non-harmful violence. You seem t… | /r/MensRights | 22/06/22 11:40 PM |
| 0 | Woman throws beer at a man and still gets protected by the guy recording. This video is going viral and everyone is taking the side of the man.Oh, okay, then I guess I should throw beer on absolutely anyone that I don't like without consequences, right? Not even remotely what I said. After all, it is just a beer, not like it's cold or that it stinks or that it's wet or that it is pretty uncomfortable to sit through 1-2 hours watching a game with your son while you stink as beer and not like he paid a lot for the tickets just to have his day ruined by a psycho. You do not escalate to physical violence from that no matter the gender. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/22 11:37 PM |
| -72 | Woman throws beer at a man and still gets protected by the guy recording. This video is going viral and everyone is taking the side of the man.I mean it feels like he was doing it out a place of keeping the guy from going to jail for doing something that the cops would arrest him for instead. When I heard him saying "Bro it's a female" to me that was him coding for "Whatever you do to her, you're going to be the bad guy". And honestly, yes, telling him to shut up and calm down is the proper response. When something happens to you that isn't harmful, responding with violence or more aggression isn't the answer. If she pulled a gun on hi… | /r/MensRights | 22/06/22 12:20 PM |
| 4 | White man replaced by 2 women wins $10,000,000 discrimination suit. Employer insists they'd rather go broke than end woke.If I scroll all the way down his account I do see it, but it doesn't say he is actively working. It says he has a sound studio (which many freelance people do) and that he is a composer, which is a hobby many people partake in because for most people it is not enough to be a full time job. Like the other comment, it does not add or remove credibility from his statement. Just as someone would say they are an active woodworker and have retired simply selling small projects they make, I can just as… | /r/MensRights | 27/10/21 11:30 PM |
| 7 | White man replaced by 2 women wins $10,000,000 discrimination suit. Employer insists they'd rather go broke than end woke.The first link just proves that he's in his 60's. Doesn't really lend any evidence for or against him. He never put a date on when he won his case. Could have been last month and it wouldn't change anything. The second doesn't even have a comment from him. A quick scan through his comments shows he only posts here and it doesn't really indicate anything false in his comments. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/21 08:59 PM |
| 1 | Are incel culture and single mothers two sides of the same coin called hypergamy?I mean I still stay up late. When my parents take the kiddo on the weekend we stay up all night gaming. But when they don't, I don't mind going to bed and waking up on the kids schedule. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/21 11:41 PM |
| 1 | Are incel culture and single mothers two sides of the same coin called hypergamy?My wife and I are just shy of 10 years apart. Don't feel bad about it at all. The problem with dating in your 30's is the field is comprised of single moms (made that mistake once, never again), unstable women, or desperate women. Finding a normal woman is incredibly difficult because most of them are married in their 20's. The main problem I have is that I find myself at a slightly different stage in life than she is. She still wants to stay up late and have no responsibilities and I'm happy to… | /r/MensRights | 04/09/21 08:53 PM |
| 5 | Woman cheers in court after getting custody of child.You and me both brother | /r/MensRights | 30/06/20 06:40 PM |
| 3 | Woman cheers in court after getting custody of child.I wouldn't call them a hate group. Their response is due to things like this video. Much like vigilante justice. Some people will take the noble route of apprehending criminals and turning them into authorities and some will take justice into their own hands. Both turned away from a system that harmed them, one just takes it past a reasonable level. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/20 06:29 PM |
| 14 | Woman cheers in court after getting custody of child.In many cases, they still do. The courts don't really care if you are or aren't biologically related. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/20 06:25 PM |
| 1 | Woman reacts to having to pay child support to single DadSo yet another reply, stating the same, stamping your feet. I expected nothing and you delivered. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/20 12:43 AM |
| 0 | Woman reacts to having to pay child support to single Dad1st and foremost: Payer != payee The payer is the person generating the child support. The payee is the one receiving it. The payer ought to have insight into where that money goes. Yes, and again, if you think that a person who wouldn't spend money on a kid would have any problem falsifying spending, I don't know what discussion we can have. Again, I’m also not suggesting that the IRS take this over either. That was the assertion when you initially mentioned it. I’m saying that guidelines for s… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/20 09:08 PM |
| 0 | Woman reacts to having to pay child support to single DadI didn’t introduce bureaucrats into the equation at all Someone needs to validate the receipts submitted...are you suggesting that receipts are submitted to no one? Also, you already suggested the IRS as a source of validation - so you absolutely did suggest bureaucrats. I said the payer. So self validation. Do you really think that someone who is going to use child support funds for something other than they're child is somehow above lying that they spent the money on the child? As for the IRS … | /r/MensRights | 06/04/20 08:44 PM |
| 0 | Woman reacts to having to pay child support to single DadWe can find many exceptions, excuses and nitpicks so why bother with any form accountability? Literally not what I said at all, but continue to burn that straw man down! Your counter examples themselves fall apart quickly upon examination. This should be good for a chuckle. Diapers = WIC approved —> automatically approved. Wow, we're going to start here. OK, first off diapers aren't WIC approved since they're not food. Even if they were "WIC approved" it would have to be the certain brands and p… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/20 06:59 PM |
| 0 | Woman reacts to having to pay child support to single DadSomehow many companies manage to have expense accounting for p-cards. As someone who has had a p-card and had non-eligible expenses reimbursed, no, they really don't. taking photos of receipts and making them available for the paying party to review is not terribly onerous for someone who gets a sizeable check every month. Literally not what I said at all. Let's take a simple example. If I am receiving $300 a month in support. Can I say that since I need a car to tranport the child, that my $350… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/20 04:50 PM |
| 4 | Woman reacts to having to pay child support to single DadYeah it definitely reasonable, But i think it should be measured more objectively with proof that the money is necessary for the kid. The question really boils down to "How do you prove what is reasonable?". You could easily submit grocery bills, car payments, insurance premiums all as proof of care for the child - breaking out what proof is required is a meaningless bureaucratic mess. What we should be fighting for is for the government to get the hell out of child support as its only contribut… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/20 04:00 PM |
| 15 | I just wanted to celebrate this dad for making his daughter happy. I know I'd do anything for my children to see them smile like that.That's beautiful. The smile on her face says it all. Were my daughter in the same position, I'd probably cry to see her so happy. The geek in me really wants to know exactly how he set that up too. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/20 09:56 AM |
| 32 | Hung up at my school.It's not though. Even the most "expert" people regularly can be wrong or have outdated information. I regularly correct people who have far more experience than me simply because there are different or better ways of doing things and explain those things to them. This chart sits on the presumptuous "having more experience means you're right" which is absurd. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/19 06:23 PM |
| 33 | Woman refused to help because I "post on Men's rights"A quick browse of their posts indicate that they also work in operations for tech companies AND run their own company hiring technical people. So, I'm pretty sure this is just a case of someone making shit up for the sake of feeling smug an superior, or they work 3 full time jobs. You pick. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/19 01:07 PM |
| 1 | (Sorry if been posted before) Personally I think that this is great that this woman was jailed for lying but I don’t think 9 months in prison makes up for the fact that he spent a week in jail, lost his job and lost his wife.That's literally not a thing. You're trying to pass off a vast conspiracy as fact. It isn't. A court isn't going to convict someone simply because they want to punish them. Courts need evidence. You can argue that the evidence is circumstantial, but that doesn't mean there is no evidence. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/19 02:00 AM |
| 1 | (Sorry if been posted before) Personally I think that this is great that this woman was jailed for lying but I don’t think 9 months in prison makes up for the fact that he spent a week in jail, lost his job and lost his wife.I've watched videos and read articles saying that though. You then proceed to link a lot of articles of people "wrongfully convicted" not people who are sitting in jail because the didn't get a trial. Explain these than, these were statistics and stories about certain innocent people being convicted of different crimes and they spent years in jail. I mean when you literally prove my point after claiming they were only arrested. So which is it? Are you claiming that people are executed wrongfully… | /r/MensRights | 10/08/19 06:19 PM |
| 1 | (Sorry if been posted before) Personally I think that this is great that this woman was jailed for lying but I don’t think 9 months in prison makes up for the fact that he spent a week in jail, lost his job and lost his wife.many people that are in jail right now or got the death penalty years later were found out to be completely innocent It's probably best to delete your comments before outright lying about what you said. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/19 08:29 AM |
| 1 | (Sorry if been posted before) Personally I think that this is great that this woman was jailed for lying but I don’t think 9 months in prison makes up for the fact that he spent a week in jail, lost his job and lost his wife.I'm not saying they get excuted, I'm saying they get arrested. Which has nothing to do with the presumption of innocence. And yes, that's exactly what you said in your original statement. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/19 07:18 AM |
| 1 | (Sorry if been posted before) Personally I think that this is great that this woman was jailed for lying but I don’t think 9 months in prison makes up for the fact that he spent a week in jail, lost his job and lost his wife.Um, it DOES happen though especially in cases where men are being abused by a woman and call the police, usually it's seen as the man lying and he gets arrested. Please source for me a man who was executed for this. Hell, even provide me a source where they've been convicted without trial. I'll wait. Not going to bother to read the rest when you've made such an obtuse and ridiculous claim. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/19 06:59 AM |
| 4 | (Sorry if been posted before) Personally I think that this is great that this woman was jailed for lying but I don’t think 9 months in prison makes up for the fact that he spent a week in jail, lost his job and lost his wife.No one in jail or executed was done without a trial. Evidence was presented and the punishment occurred because of that evidence. Whether you and I think that evidence was enough doesn't matter. It was the judge and jury that decided that. Until that trial they were presumed innocent, and the prosecution made a case that was enough to convince the court that they did wrong. You don't seem to understand what "innocent until proven guilty" is. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/19 04:21 AM |
| 11 | ‘Men In Black’ Star Tessa Thompson Suggests A Woker Name: ‘Humans In Black’ | More feminist cancer. This movie already looked bad, I'm definitely giving it a miss now.Yep, they're a thing with conspiracy nutjobs. It's not a conspiracy thing - it's a literal term for government agents. The black suit has been used by many US government agencies, both public and clandestine. Men in black was a term used for the FBI, CIA, and any number of other federal agencies which showed up in suits. Much like the term Gman, it has been used by conspiracists, but is not exclusive to them. | /r/MensRights | 13/06/19 07:53 PM |
| 4 | I can here for a laugh but ended up subscribingI'm not sure where you came from Check his post history, he came from MGTOW. He has a lot of posts that are just cringy. This guy isn't here honestly. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/19 02:58 AM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!In defense of Yang, inflation concerns assume that everyone is proportionally affected the same by Yang's proposal. i.e everyone consumes around the same amount of goods. No, that isn't assumed at all. The simple fact that there is more money floating around will increase prices. We see this time and time again when things like minimum wage increases happen. Adding a VAT to all consumer goods, and maybe adjusting the percentages for common goods like food and water would be far more preferable t… | /r/MensRights | 12/04/19 05:42 AM |
| 1 | Man who contributed 850,000 out of 900,000 lines of code vs woman who added other programmers' code. Guess who gets the credit for the black hole image?Grumpy old men unite! | /r/MensRights | 11/04/19 10:10 PM |
| 2 | Man who contributed 850,000 out of 900,000 lines of code vs woman who added other programmers' code. Guess who gets the credit for the black hole image?Without knowing your audience, as is common on the internet, it's very hard to chose a villain who you would see as reprehensible. It's why Nazi's are such a frequent image. You could easily be a communist and believe that Stalin did nothing wrong, so trying to compare someone to Stalin would endear you to them creating the wrong effect. Until we have a new group that can be as derided as the Nazi's, they'll still be the default group to compare to | /r/MensRights | 11/04/19 09:18 PM |
| 4 | Man who contributed 850,000 out of 900,000 lines of code vs woman who added other programmers' code. Guess who gets the credit for the black hole image?Why always Nazi's though? Nazi's are the go to because they are the biggest foe of our time that are universally considered bad. For example, you could compare to Castro and not have near as many people consider it bad since there are a ton of people that think Communism isn't a bad ideology. You could compare to the Stalin, but even still you'll find a lot of people to stand up and support him. Some of the worst people in the history of the world have a decent amount of fervent supporters - Naz… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/19 09:10 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!The VAT isn't the inflationary effect. It's not factored into inflation numbers. The inflationary part of Yang's proposal is multi faceted. First, in order to pay for this he'll need 3 trillion in total funds. His own website only lists one income source of 800 billion. The other things he lists are "savings" from other sources. Things like "less crime" which aren't federal savings, they're savings for state or local governments meaning that the federal government isn't employing less prison gua… | /r/MensRights | 24/03/19 08:13 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Wow dude, you replied to me three times with the same idiocy and ignored everything I said to make the same wrong comments. Stick to one reply lol. | /r/MensRights | 21/03/19 03:07 AM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Wow dude, you replied to me three times with the same idiocy and ignored everything I said to make the same wrong comments. Stick to one reply lol. | /r/MensRights | 21/03/19 03:07 AM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!There is, actually. I've looked over his website, there really isn't. He demonstrates in numerous interviews how the numbers add up. Since all the items he has listed don't, there is no way he can change those numbers to make the math work. You took ten seconds to read a bit of his website and saw that PART of the plan is $800b from VAT, but that is unequivocally not the only component of the plan. No, I read it all. Thanks for telling me about my life and what I've done with it. I'm sure glad t… | /r/MensRights | 21/03/19 03:07 AM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Not without violating our international defense agreements and our NATO commitments. We would need to massively restructure these treaties in which we are supporting most of the force of the UN and NATO to other countries. Cutting our spending in half would violate at the very least our NATO funding commitment, if not many of our overseas bases. But coming back around to the idea that we could cut military funding, even in half, that's only 325 billion, there is another 1.8 trillion to cover the… | /r/MensRights | 20/03/19 03:03 AM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Regardless of the mechanics of their UBI, the result is more money in the hands of all citizens. That’s just some amount of data I’m providing to back up my assertion that concerns about inflation are unfounded. Man if you aren't even going to acknowledge the stupid high cost of living in Alaska as being a symptom then I don't know there is any reason to read anything else you wrote. You can have the last word your ego so clearly needs to feel it won. I'm done here. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/19 06:06 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Except Alaska has had a yearly basic income since the 1970’s and its rate of inflation have been lower than the national average ever since. Alaska doesn't have a UBI - it's literally a sale for what the mining companies have bought from them. That's a fair bit different especially considering that the total payment is quite low. It's also completely dishonest to say that Alaska has the lowest inflation, because the cost of living in Alaska is leaps and bounds above the cost of nearly anywhere e… | /r/MensRights | 19/03/19 03:00 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!How often is the response to climate change “I can’t even take care of my family, fuck the penguins?” I know I’ve said that myself. This really has no analogy to this situation. Making earth friendly consumer choices often requires more disposable income. Ok, this still has no bearing on anything I've said. I’m enthused by lab grown meat as a solution to bovine sources of methane. It could be adopted faster with a UBI. I mean, I know you intend well, but you clearly haven't read anything I wrote… | /r/MensRights | 19/03/19 08:12 AM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!So in order for humanity to move forward we need to let the poor die? Yes, because that's exactly what I said. Nice strawman. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/19 03:56 AM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Stop acting like I'm the one who'se retarded here, and do some reading of your own. I've done the reading. You are just trolling at this point. The government has previously promised you $100/mo or $2000/mo in entitlements. Social Security isn't an entitlement. It isn't a program that is just general fund cash sloshed into a program. It is a forced savings program. The money you pay in is to be paid back to you in the future. This is why there is death benefits for social security. With UBI, you… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/19 09:28 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!That is still wrong. No, it's not. But again, you don't read what I wrote and continue to blather on about accounting convience instead of looking at what UBI actually is. But the reduction allows the few/many who get under $1000/mo in SS benefits to get topped off. Which is almost no one. In 2010 is was less than 75k people. The minimum SS benefit is around $800 which is a trivial amount of people. You sit on a throne of lies and want so badly for me to gobble up your bullshit. If they get the … | /r/MensRights | 16/03/19 03:54 AM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Sorry was skimming this, though not positive what happens. There is a 50% clawback, but it is given back after you reach full retirement age. Only if you are working AND taking SS benefits. That's the only time they reduce the benefits and it's not a tax either. You seriously have so little information and then post links that you don't even read fully. It's no wonder our conversations have gone in circles as you ignore most of what I say in favor of making useless and unsound points. This point… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/19 03:19 AM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/102714/how-are-social-security-benefits-affected-your-income.asp You really need to read your links. Under normal circumstances, your Social Security benefits are not taxable. If, however, your income while taking benefits is higher than the maximum limits established by the IRS, your benefits become partially taxable. Nobody pays income taxes on more than 85% of benefits, however. Go find a new bridge to troll under. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/19 02:21 AM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!That worked the full 35 years. The $9/hr FULL TIME is the average wage needed including all of the $0 hours. Yes, and you are trying to tell me that people worked that wage for 35 years. Inflation adjusted that is so unlikely, especially for MANY people as you claimed. But anyway, if they are getting more than this, than it doesn't get topped off. Then I'll just repeat exactly what I said before. It's not UBI then. Why is that so hard to grasp? One reason they might want to choose UBI over SS is… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/19 03:09 AM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!You were saying section 8 housing vouchers get "bundled" with welfare. Yes, this is true. If there is a welfare case worker that you need to beg for benefits to, then you are forced to stay within commuting distance of them. This is not true and I have no idea where you would get this information from. First and foremost, welfare benefits are not tied to a location. You can at any time advise that you are moving and they will assign you to a different location that is closer to you. One does not… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 09:46 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!I'm done arguing. And yet here you are again. I'm asking an honest question at this point. Given your history here, no, it's not honest. Because their printed word is no better than their spoken word by your logic. It's just the latter put down as text. No, printed word can be referred back to and put in as black and white. It is very hard to say that you have twisted someone's words when they are in print, carefully crafted and edited. Go give the Joe Rogan interview a try that's all I ask. Aga… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 09:09 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Part of the condition for welfare is staying where you are. Uh what? No, you don't have to stay where you are. It's a voucher that allows you to rent up to the limit that they provide for. I'm not sure if everyone accepts section 8 vouchers Landlords can choose to accept them or not. Usually places with high rents choose not to while low to mid rent locations will since they are reimbursed rates near what their rent is. but if you had cash, you could rent a mansion with 20 cohabitators if you wa… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 09:04 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!And for that reason, I'M OUT! And just like that, you broke your promise. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 06:48 PM |
| 2 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!If people are getting more than they currently do, they can use it as an excuse to eliminate the programs. I'm not sure that states kick in any money for foodstamps, btw. States have to burden the entire cost of administration, plus many states provide benefits above and beyond the federal level. For example, Calfresh provides benefits to people that don't meet federal guidelines, mostly because the cost of living in California is so high that you could be in an area and not be "in poverty" but … | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 06:47 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!He should have everything on his website I 100% agree. But he had said several things that aren't there for some reason. Then it's not his platform. If he isn't willing to print it, he isn't committed to it. Hell look at Bernie's website. There's not even a single policy listed. Well that's because Bernie is selling dreams, not actual policies. You have to go by what they say as much as what you read about them then make your judgement call. Right, and when we went by what Trump said, we got Tru… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 06:22 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Food stamps and welfare is much lower than $1000/month. I don't disagree, but the total federal spending on foodstamps is only 66 billion. That's a long haul from the 3 trillion that it would cost to fund UBI as proposed. And again, states are just going to pick up welfare and foodstamps. Those programs won't go away. As far as welfare costing less, per person it certainly doesn't. Remember that welfare includes a payment for rent, which for most families in any major metro area is going to exce… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 06:15 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!He's literally discussed this tech tax on just about every interview he's given. OK, then if that is his plan, his own website should have that listed, shouldn't it? Go watch Joe Rogan's and then come back and chat. Or I could just go off his own printed words. I think I'll do exactly that. As for the TL;DR you gave on inflation, I'm well aware that 10% isn't the only cost that will be there No, you didn't. Otherwise you wouldn't have quoted "basic math" at me. Even if companies increase 10% to … | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 05:52 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Foodstamps is funded at both state and federal levels. While I agree that you could cut the federal portion, states would simply be left to pick up the difference (as many did when the federal government shut down and stopped providing payments for foodstamps). It's not a savings if you are simply shifting who is paying for it. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 05:46 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!You missed the part where he's including a tech tax for business such as Amazon that replace workers with robotics. That is not in the "How we pay for UBI" that is literally him try to pay for his other programs and has nothing to do with his UBI. Yes we pay more in taxes for the VAT. But unless you wind up paying $10,000 a month for goods and services, the amount you pay in taxes will not exceed the $1000 dividend. Basic math. Yes, that is basic math, but that's not the whole cost. See, the pro… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 05:33 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Taking money from Amazon and giving a life changing amount to the middle class won't make a difference? Okay then. Who is taking money from Amazon? He is proposing a VAT to pay for this, which is entirely YOU, as a consumer, paying that tax. He has another plan he discusses in the interview about a specific tax for big tech businesses called the tech tax. Which would be incredibly stupid as the only reason this economy does as well as it does is because of our strong tech sector. Start taxing th… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 05:16 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!National budgetary savings are relevant. They would be, if there were savings to be had. Since foodstamps is a state program, there wouldn't be any savings. We'd simply be moving the cost of foodstamp programs from partially federally funded to entirely state funded. This isn't a savings. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 05:12 PM |
| 0 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!You'll get no argument from me on that. But seeing as we are committed via pacts and agreements with defense of other countries, we can't just stop spending money on the military. If we started to withdraw our bases in foreign countries to exert our might there, then maybe, but even then, the military is only 650 billion. You'd still need to come up with another 1.5 trillion to cover the cost of the free money for everyone plan. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 05:11 PM |
| 2 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Watch him actually talk about it in an interview. He goes into more detail There is literally zero more detail. He isn't an economist. He hasn't looked at any of the places that tried this or did basic work. You honestly don't think an extra $1000 would not cause extra spending? It literally cannot. Taking over $1000 from person A (who already was using that money) and moving it to person B doesn't simply make more spending. It actually makes less because we've taken more from one person to give… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 01:41 PM |
| 0 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!But the speed of change is unprecedented. No, it isn't. It's no different now than any other period. The change only seems bigger because there are more people. Quite honestly, as a percentage of change in the workforce, automobiles were far more disruptive. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 01:39 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Oh I see. You are closed-minded. I literally detailed out why his argument doesn't work. There is no proposal that suddenly suspends how economics works. Yeah, then a debate is not possible. Because you ignore basic economics, yeah. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 01:38 PM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!LOL! Nice, try but i said that AFTER you made your comment, not after! You are not an honest person. So you do realize that you did say it and want to ignore it? I mean you could just look at your own words where you said it before: The jobs are already disappearing and the new jobs do not provide anywhere near the same work hours. No way are there as many kids designing websites as there are men who have lost their manufacturing jobs. And no way do the self checkouts require as many hours to ma… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 01:37 PM |
| 2 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Universal basic income is not a new thing, and in theory it could potentially work No, it simply cannot. There is no economical way that it can. The biggest issue most people face when listening to the argument of UBI is that the government seems like it's throwing money at people which is then never seen again. No, the biggest argument is that you are massively increasing inflation. This money actually almost completely goes back into society in forms of goods and services/fees which can then b… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 01:30 PM |
| 5 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!I mean if you want to ignore that the crimes he is talking about aren't federal so there isn't a savings there, and ignore that shuffling money from person A to person B doesn't increase the amount of money so increased economic activity isn't a thing, and you want to ignore that the amount of federal spending in programs like foodstamps wouldn't decrease, sure. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 01:27 PM |
| 2 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!3 trillion a year is the EXACT number Yang gives, and proceeds to back up that number with an exact detailed plan on how it will be paid for. I've been to his website, why would you lie like this. The only plan he has is that he will raise a VAT for 800 billion. He then proceeds to hope that an increase in spending will occur (which is impossible, you don't shuffle money and get MORE spending), and then he proposes that there will be magical savings elsewhere, both of which are only estimated at… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 01:25 PM |
| 6 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!You keep replying to me but don't seem to get the hint. It doesn't work. Milton Friedman didn't argue UBI on economic reasons, he did it for things completely outside of economics. He also supported it in line with a flat tax, which outside of that wouldn't have worked. What Yang is supporting is giving everyone money, not just giving the poorest money, as Friedman noted. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 08:28 AM |
| 1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Yes, but not at the same rate as today Yes, at the same rate as today. Or do you think that somehow the stabling, care, and workers associated with horses were somehow less effected by automobiles? not without a massive amount of jobs to replace those lost. We are replacing those jobs. They are always more skilled jobs that require knowledge or education. LOL! Given that i did not make that claim not without a massive amount of jobs to replace those lost. Uh huh.....sure you didn't. Hardware? Al… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 08:24 AM |
| 5 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!No, he doesn't. It will cost almost 3 trillion a year to do this. 800 billion isn't going to cover it. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 08:20 AM |
| -9 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!I don't need to hear his arguments. The basic economics of it simply don't pan out. It's not like this is a new thing and he is suddenly reinventing the wheel, he is proposing the same system that simply would break an economy, not to mention there is absolutely no way to pay for it aside from a massive tax which would also hurt the economy. We would need to raise 230 billion per month to cover this kind of plan, or 2.8 trillion dollars a year. That's more than half the current federal budget. B… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 08:16 AM |
| -1 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!The jobs are already disappearing and the new jobs do not provide anywhere near the same work hours Jobs have been disappearing for the last 300+ years as technology improves. This isn't something that we haven't seen in the past. I work in technolgy, to say that new jobs aren't popping up all over the place is stupid. We have started a massive move to automate a lot of functions that people used to do by hand. But there's still a lot we have to do by hand that you can't automate, like physical … | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 08:00 AM |
| 3 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Explain how "the executive branch directing executive agencies" gives the President the power to take away your guns See the ATF. Who can at any time, choose to classify a weapon as they see fit, placing onerous restrictions on that weapon, without any input from any other branch of government, at the direction of the President. Look no further than the bump stock ban. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 07:55 AM |
| 8 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!I've looked into it. It's garbage. Even assuming that you can come up with the money to do it without massively harming the economy in the process, you have another stark economic impact. When you start handing out money, you are causing inflation. "Everyone has money for their basic needs!" - Well sure, but that means there is more consumption of those needs. Those prices will rise. Not to mention that the companies who are seeing a higher tax burden for it are passing those costs along as well… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 07:51 AM |
| 17 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Of those 325 million, about a third are children, but you're right, their math still doesn't check out. Which is the real secret, we're just going to borrow the rest....shhhhhhhh....don't tell | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 07:48 AM |
| 25 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!Yes, $800B is a small number. The US Federal budget is $3.8 trillion. 800 billion is almost a quarter of that. So yes, that's a big number. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 07:46 AM |
| -5 | 2020 U.S. Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang just declared he opposes routine infant circumcision!If he was then he wouldn't believe in a $1000 a month cash payout to everyone. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/19 07:43 AM |
| 6 | Child support of $161K is no longer supporting just the child. We need limits for what the government can force a man to pay in child support.Alright, let's assume you're right, and that all 3 children haven't been paid since the beginning of their life to age 18 (minus the one who is 16). That 624 months of unpaid child support, assuming not one penny paid every and for the entirety of all three kids lives. That's $258 per month, per child. A very reasonable figure. But that isn't the amount of time they spent. He divorced in 2009, meaning that there is 9 years of back child support (7 for one child who turned 18 2 years ago). Now we… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/19 07:29 AM |
| 2 | Child support of $161K is no longer supporting just the child. We need limits for what the government can force a man to pay in child support.To be fair it is a total of $161k in back child support. He has three kids that he should have paid for so this number could easily be a realistic number. It likely isn't given that he was quite rich at one point, but without context this is not giving us any details to make a sound conclusion. It's not like his monthly was $161k and he missed a payment | /r/MensRights | 07/03/19 07:23 AM |
| 1 | Pay Gap? Non-executive isn't a job title, comparing apples with oranges...Try reading the headline again and point out to me where in the headline it says that there aren't women in executive positions. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/19 01:54 AM |
| 1 | Pay Gap? Non-executive isn't a job title, comparing apples with oranges...That is what the headline should have read, but they just stated "Look at these women making less than this guy" with no context. A real issue is "Where are the executive women" and not "Why are the top women making less than this one executive". | /r/MensRights | 04/03/19 01:54 AM |
| 11 | Pay Gap? Non-executive isn't a job title, comparing apples with oranges...Yes but i think the point is women aren't being made executives. Well no, the point being made is that women are earning less than this one guy. The subtle thing that people would notice is that there aren't any women execs, which I don't think the author intended at all. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/19 11:32 PM |
| 8 | May all feminists live in buildings built by feminist physics. A feminist scholar claims that Newtonian physics is oppressive and that we must use “quantum feminisms”No, they even included a note about that at the end of the article: Editor’s Note: This article has been emended since its original publication. While Stark believes that “Newtonian physics” is oppressive, this article originally stated that Stark believed physics as a field to be oppressive. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/18 07:36 PM |
| 5 | Repost for personal info... My friend called out his mom... not sure how to approachThis is the proper response and what I wanted to say. It should be the top comment. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/18 02:51 PM |
| 1 | Takei, a staunch advocate of equal rights, seems to be ok with sexism if not directed towards women.We are. He is not. Takei has routinely pushed the agenda that all women should be believed without question, until he was accused. It is not a matter of our beliefs, it is holding him accountable to the ones he has espoused. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/18 02:56 PM |
| 40 | Mother seeks to ban boy & mother from public park; liberal folks on twitter make much fun of it.It felt, to me at least, that it was mocking her - especially adding the "no?" at the end. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/18 02:10 PM |
| 18 | But there's a gender specific pronoun in your name...No no no, he's half man, half bear, and half pig | /r/MensRights | 13/02/18 06:53 AM |
| 2 | The naked truth about Fake newsMaybe it's been a while since you were newly employed or employed anyone, but there's a laundry list of documents that are signed and filed with a new hire or with an employee evaluation. They can all be submitted as evidence against gender-based discrimination. What does signing a document have to do with proving or disproving discrimination? Do you believe that someone signing a document saying that their negotiation for salary wasn't discriminatory would somehow validate that claim? Enforcing… | /r/MensRights | 05/01/18 05:40 PM |
| 2 | The naked truth about Fake newsUsually by having employee evaluation reports. That doesn't prove whether you are paying based on gender or not. Especially considering new hires, if someone negotiated a higher salary, you now have no proof of salary based off of gender. You simply have no way to prove or disprove pay based on gender. | /r/MensRights | 05/01/18 03:21 PM |
| 9 | The naked truth about Fake newsIf you can't prove that you're paying someone less for any reason other than being a different gender, then they are guilty. It's pretty cut and dry. How do you prove that? | /r/MensRights | 03/01/18 09:00 PM |
| 1 | Literally Hitler...Look, clearly aren't here to discuss what I said and rather want to make up arguments I didn't make, you can have the last word you so desperately need for your ego to feel you won, I'm done here. Further comments will go unread. | /r/MensRights | 13/11/17 07:49 PM |
| 2 | Literally Hitler...Apparently you are unable to see the difference between a collective you and a personal one. | /r/MensRights | 13/11/17 07:41 PM |
| 3 | Literally Hitler...I don't remember claiming it was anyone's job. Perhaps you are replying to the wrong comment? | /r/MensRights | 13/11/17 07:16 PM |
| 2 | Literally Hitler...The only way they're going to become better people is if they choose and work towards becoming better people Indeed, but did you encourage them to do that or validate their beliefs that everyone is just out to get them? But reddit didn't do that. They merely denied them a place to congregate. They are still allowed to use reddit and can form a new sub, or a private one and continue to do what they did before. If reddit wanted to take a stand, they'd stop banning individual subreddits and start b… | /r/MensRights | 13/11/17 07:02 PM |
| 1 | Literally Hitler...I think you have to be approved to post, but viewing is open I think | /r/MensRights | 13/11/17 06:38 PM |
| -1 | Literally Hitler...Yes.... /r/Anarcho_Capitalism (althought t_d has brigaded it to a bunch of shit lately) /r/GoldandBlack is a nicer one. | /r/MensRights | 13/11/17 04:50 PM |
| 3 | Literally Hitler...Are you suggesting the problem with r/incels was troll accounts and not bitter, angry, and socially inept individuals? Let's assume, for a minute, that they were exactly as you paint them. If that is the case, do you believe that banning that sub is going to change them and make them better people, or is it simply moving them into the general population of reddit? | /r/MensRights | 13/11/17 04:47 PM |
| 28 | Wendy Williams destroys audience of entitled man-haters in 5 secondsThere are only things I can't stand in this world... | /r/MensRights | 25/10/17 05:46 AM |
| 1 | Texas forces man to pay 65,000 USD for a kid that DNA tests showed is not hisYou started adding your own filler to the little that I said Uh, these are your words, not mine: On the flip side of that coin, even if the person is charged, tried, and acquitted, another level of government can step up and charge the guy. No, they cannot. That does not happen. for instance I never said or inferred that they would try him twice for the same crime You did. You said that if someone is found not guilty, that the feds can just prosecute him. Your words. So I tried to say it again i… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/17 03:33 AM |
| 0 | Texas forces man to pay 65,000 USD for a kid that DNA tests showed is not hisHow does that have any bearing on what I said? | /r/MensRights | 20/08/17 02:37 AM |
| 1 | Texas forces man to pay 65,000 USD for a kid that DNA tests showed is not hisWell, you are equating two different things. First, Zimmerman cannot be tried for the same crime by the Federal government. That would be double jeopardy. Charging him with a civil rights violation is an entirely different crime and never had the chance of seeing the light of day. By your statement, "another level of government can step up and charge the guy" is very very wrong. We do not allow levels of government to charge the same person with a crime multiple times. | /r/MensRights | 20/08/17 02:16 AM |
| 6 | Everything you wanted to know but you were too afraid to ask about those evil creatures called menYou should know, serious Jews are very racist. Dated a Jew, can confirm. Even the non-serious ones are too. Apparently they have a deep rooted thing against blacks because they think blacks hate them. | /r/MensRights | 06/08/17 06:45 PM |
| 4 | Everything you wanted to know but you were too afraid to ask about those evil creatures called mensexist "microaggressions" (hate that buzz word, they should just call it "being a dick") condescending because of sex It would be really helpful if people would stop looking at these are issues of sex when it is really just awful people. The idea that men are condescending because of sex is a lot less prevalent. Most of the people that are condescending are that way to everyone regardless of their sex. Also, a lot of times when someone is flat wrong and is being proven wrong, it is thrown out th… | /r/MensRights | 06/08/17 06:43 PM |
| 2 | This guy says it perfectlyYou won't ever see a man convicted of rape when the only evidence is her claim that he initiated while they were both drunk. http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865683051/Logan-man-charged-with-raping-fellow-USU-student.html There needs to be far more evidence than this. http://www.businessinsider.com/can-you-get-convicted-of-rape-if-you-were-drunk-2013-11 You can, and do. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/17 05:16 PM |
| 7 | This guy says it perfectlyThat would be nice if that is how the legal system worked. In reality, it does not. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/17 01:19 PM |
| 1 | Looks like The Red Pill is now available on PrimeIt looked like it stopped after the first episode when I last saw it a few months back It was just the test episode, the full season was confirmed and set for release in September (I think, might have been august). I didnt enjoy their take on Man in the High Castle Really? I loved it. The second season brought a lot more to the table. They have a show Betas which didn't get a second season but was really enjoyable. Their shows tend to flirt with much darker topics than Netflix, so you really nee… | /r/MensRights | 11/06/17 05:30 AM |
| 2 | Looks like The Red Pill is now available on PrimeThey are bringing back live action The Tick this fall | /r/MensRights | 10/06/17 09:02 PM |
| 5 | Looks like The Red Pill is now available on PrimeRemember that a third of the US population is children, thus would be benefiting from the prime of their parents. This makes it more like two fifths, or 40% | /r/MensRights | 10/06/17 09:01 PM |
| 1 | Prime example of the sentencing disparity between men and women.but seeing how ignorant redditors,altrighters and many whites are when it comes to issues minorities have to face,it proved me otherwise. So your proof that white privilege is a real legitimate thing is that people you don't like claim it isn't real? | /r/MensRights | 16/03/17 06:59 PM |
| 2 | Prime example of the sentencing disparity between men and women.There's no more than a 10%-12% variance when similar crime, lengthy arrest records, prior convictions and recidivism factors are considered. You can whittle that down even further when you compare representation. Considering that blacks disproportionately have public defenders rather than private council, they often get worse sentences as public defenders are awful at their job (not out of malice or gross incompetence but due to the huge workload). Most try to get their defendants to accept plea… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/17 06:05 PM |
| 14 | Court finally stops trying to make Detroit man pay child support for child that isn't his: Thank you attorney Cherika Harris, who took on this case with probably little personal financial rewardI am all for this person getting justice, but it needs to be in the form of action, not a sum of money. Why not both? The stigma of "deadbeat dad" hangs on a person. Both mentally and physically it harms the person. His wages were impacted, his job opportunities taken - he should be reawrded monetarily. As far as punishing those who took away his rights, you are asking the government to investigate the government. As has been the case for over 100 years, they will find themselves "innocent" and … | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 06:37 PM |
| 2 | William Shatner at War With Feminist Blog ‘The Mary Sue’Cosby is escaping trial because a lot of the accusations are he said / she said. They have little to no evidence other than the accusers story. Just like anything else, prosecutors need evidence of wrong doing which 15+ years of lag between accusations is going to destroy. If a single woman had come out when this happened, the stories could be more credible. But as of right now, there weren't any then, and the accusations now appear like bandwagoning rather than actual evidence of wrong doing. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/16 11:36 PM |
| 2 | Empty cinemas in Ghostbusters opening week. Constantly attacking your audience with vile insults doesn't seem to be a profitable strategy after alli hope that studio execs will learn their lesson that their audience is not the sjws. their audience is male nerds. Male nerds, by and large, buy into the SJW propaganda. Finding nerds who aren't "saying anything to a woman is sexism" types is incredibly difficult. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/16 05:58 PM |
| 3 | ShoeOnHead destroys the lie that "feminism is about equality"She had no answer. I love winning a debate. It isn't about winning the debate, it's about changing the way she frames it. If you just left her at no answer, a huge opportunity was missed to probe a little further. Bring up real problems represented by men and show how they aren't represented by feminism | /r/MensRights | 14/03/16 04:26 PM |
| 1 | Libertarian policy - opposition to gov. involvement in wage protection, that mean's no immigration restrictions, no unions, no job security.Recent growth in popularity of libertarianism is astrotruf manipulation of the less politically astute to advocate against their best interests.You're obviously very young I am not young. or not an American I am American. However, you are not, so speaking like you are is really funny. Both these things happen and neither is in any way illegal. Uh what? Are you sure you're talking about the US? Courts have routinely held that private speech is sacred. Even in instances where your claim is true, it is only true because they filed suit against the wrong person (in this case the Sheriff personally instead of the state) and has been upheld a… | /r/MensRights | 01/03/16 10:42 PM |
| 1 | Libertarian policy - opposition to gov. involvement in wage protection, that mean's no immigration restrictions, no unions, no job security.Recent growth in popularity of libertarianism is astrotruf manipulation of the less politically astute to advocate against their best interests.Yes. People in the US can and are fired for eg driving a car with a bumper sticker their boss doesn't like. This is not true at all. In fact, the Supreme Court has upheld that activities partaken on time which is not the companies are none of the companies business. Seriously? That is a commonplace requirement. Are you talking about a non-compete? A document which has the enforcement of a wet noodle? That is also limited in scope and geography? Yeah, this isn't really a thing. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/16 10:05 PM |
| 2 | Libertarian policy - opposition to gov. involvement in wage protection, that mean's no immigration restrictions, no unions, no job security.Recent growth in popularity of libertarianism is astrotruf manipulation of the less politically astute to advocate against their best interests.It appears that you aren't American - perhaps you should stop commenting on our political structure since the basics you can't even get correct? | /r/MensRights | 01/03/16 08:31 PM |
| 3 | Libertarian policy - opposition to gov. involvement in wage protection, that mean's no immigration restrictions, no unions, no job security.Recent growth in popularity of libertarianism is astrotruf manipulation of the less politically astute to advocate against their best interests.Well your boss already controls your life more than the government What controls? Does he tell me what I can and cant drive or do in my free time? Does he bar me from seeking other employment or who I can marry? Does he restrict my religious affiliation or where I travel for vacation? Simply put, my boss has zero impact on my life and I can change bosses whenever I so choose. The government, however, gets a lot of say in the things I do all over and I can never change my government like I would … | /r/MensRights | 01/03/16 08:31 PM |
| 2 | Libertarian policy - opposition to gov. involvement in wage protection, that mean's no immigration restrictions, no unions, no job security.Recent growth in popularity of libertarianism is astrotruf manipulation of the less politically astute to advocate against their best interests.I think a lot of Libertarians get introduced to MRA because (1) they are associated with the right wing of US politics so they don't get pressure to conform to feminist brow-beating Libertarians are not right - I don't understand how you could even begin to believe this? | /r/MensRights | 01/03/16 08:19 PM |
| 4 | Libertarian policy - opposition to gov. involvement in wage protection, that mean's no immigration restrictions, no unions, no job security.Recent growth in popularity of libertarianism is astrotruf manipulation of the less politically astute to advocate against their best interests.They are libertarians on social issues but remain authoritarian on economics. They would be against having a boss tell you what religion you are but have no problem with a boss dictating facets of economic life, starting with the right of the elites to rule over everyone else. This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. Libertarians don't want anyone to dictate your life to you. You are trying to create this argument that libertarians want to turn over government controls on your life t… | /r/MensRights | 01/03/16 08:17 PM |
| 0 | Libertarian policy - opposition to gov. involvement in wage protection, that mean's no immigration restrictions, no unions, no job security.Recent growth in popularity of libertarianism is astrotruf manipulation of the less politically astute to advocate against their best interests.Everything he says is the exact opposite of the views he publicly espoused not even a decade ago. He's only saying the things he is because he wouldn't have made it against Hillary or Sanders. Just like Sanders wouldn't have made it if he stuckto his actual party instead of jumping ship at the last minute. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/16 08:10 PM |
| 0 | Libertarian policy - opposition to gov. involvement in wage protection, that mean's no immigration restrictions, no unions, no job security.Recent growth in popularity of libertarianism is astrotruf manipulation of the less politically astute to advocate against their best interests.Trump is libertarian like Bernie Sanders is a billionaire capitalist. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/16 07:56 PM |
| 1 | What possible alternative is there...?The government doesn't decide...the courts decide TIL that courts aren't part of the government | /r/MensRights | 20/02/16 08:13 PM |
| 0 | What possible alternative is there...?You're definitely missing the difference between "government" and "jury of your peers." A jury selected by the government? Also, one can choose not to have a jury trial and have a trial by judge. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/16 07:56 PM |
| 1 | I've been falsely accused of sexual assault.Don't talk to her or anyone who is relaying messages on her behalf. Cut contact, don't talk to the police unless you have a lawyer present. She's either trying to worm into your life by falsely accusing or is actually falsely accusing and NOTHING you say to her or the police will help. Delete this thread, work with a lawyer. Lastly, GO GET A LAWYER | /r/MensRights | 17/02/16 08:15 PM |
| 5 | /r/ Feminism is a jokeThat was just a running joke on reddit for sometime, not anything serious. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/16 12:14 AM |
| 17 | /r/ Feminism is a jokeYou've been banned from /r/Pyongang | /r/MensRights | 16/02/16 11:30 PM |
| 1 | Female privilege in action - she is free to act like this because she knows nobody will fight back.I have heard that if you pull the concealed carry you better fire it, and you better kill them. Because if you just injure them or brandish it then somehow that's worse. Well, if you injure them, without any other hard evidence, it becomes a he said she said case and then you run a 50/50 shot of going to jail for attempted homicide. If you just pull your gun out and wave it around, it's brandishing which in many states can be enough to revoke a CCW. It has the added benefit of giving the person … | /r/MensRights | 21/01/16 07:51 PM |
| 2 | Lady Gaga's sexist new video shows men as predators, quotes bullshit 1 in 5 stat.Emma Watson is pretty educated Educated does not equate intelligence. Nor does it confer wisdom or knowledge. On top of that, the people who are doing the "education" are the ones pushing this nonsense. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/15 01:54 PM |
| 7 | UPDATE: Teen charged with sexting girlfriend will be forced to get an erection via an injection and be photographed by police for evidenceSaid the [insert whatever bad guy you want].... Soldiers in the gulags, the FBI in Waco, Chinese prison guards.... The point isn't any less valid because people don't like Nazi comparisons. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/15 03:07 PM |
| 4 | UPDATE: Teen charged with sexting girlfriend will be forced to get an erection via an injection and be photographed by police for evidenceHow is it wrong? If you can't acknowledge this then there really is no conversation to be had here. legally its not wrong The government needs to follow its own laws that it has created. Period. Full stop. nothing morally or legally wrong was done by the police 4th Amendment violations aside, they have taken a minor, forced a substance into his body to give him an erection, taken photos of his erection, and then are detaining him for engaging in legal sexual conduct. you idiot Projection at its … | /r/MensRights | 27/08/15 01:57 PM |
| 10 | UPDATE: Teen charged with sexting girlfriend will be forced to get an erection via an injection and be photographed by police for evidenceYup cops responding to a report made by a parent are clearly like the nazi Your rationale is they were just "doing their job" even though they know it's wrong. The Nazi's and every other bad guy in the world uses that excuse. It isn't one. Wrong is wrong whether it is your job or not. People in good conscience would stand up and say NO. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/15 01:29 PM |
| 20 | UPDATE: Teen charged with sexting girlfriend will be forced to get an erection via an injection and be photographed by police for evidencethey are just doing their job Said the Nazis in Nuremberg... | /r/MensRights | 27/08/15 01:20 PM |
| 5 | "Sexual Assault by Deception" Bill Introduced in New Jersey.I wonder why British secret agents are so often the subject of stories and movies and fantasy's like this? Because Ukrainian secret agents don't seem quite so glamorous? Joking aside, in things like this, the UK is a good target. It is a close ally of the US with an accent that most people can't spot as fake or could easily be "americanized". It is as private as most other developed nations meaning that you can fake this kind of thing rather readily. Lastly, it is a well known country with secre… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/15 06:48 PM |
| 1 | Probably the realest thing you will see on Facebook today.I tend to refer to the state as an embodiment of the laws The problem with states in general is the laws are meaningless and the people behind them are the more meaningful. For example, we have a constitution which has explicit rights stated in them. For the entirety of the country's existence, we have had the government trample those rights, even after the court has said no. The people in power, the people we "elect" are the problem and they certainly don't care about the children, parents, or … | /r/MensRights | 25/05/15 07:15 PM |
| 11 | Probably the realest thing you will see on Facebook today.What about all the men that give up custody after divorce/break-up, or simply go away and cut contact? What about it? I have the assumption than men abandon their family more often than women That's a pretty terrible assumption. In the cases of most divorces, women take a majority of the assets and typically stick the man with a larger share of debt. For example, a woman may get the house and say "Well I have a $200,000 debt now and the house is only worth $150,000" and stick the man with an add… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/15 03:35 PM |
| 13 | Probably the realest thing you will see on Facebook today.The state doesn't give a shit about your relationship with your ex, they care about the welfare of the child. I can agree with most of your post except for that. The state doesn't care one way or another. If they were doing everything for the welfare of the child, jailing and punishing the parent who is behind on support is quite the opposite of helping. Once that person goes to jail, they now have a criminal record reducing their job opportunities, losing their current job because they are in j… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/15 03:24 PM |
| 3 | Feminists blame Mens Rights for MMA fighter John 'War Machine' Koppenhaver brutally beating up his ex: "All MRA's want to rape women" etc.That whooshing sound is the joke going at supersonic speeds over your head. | /r/MensRights | 21/08/14 01:42 PM |
| 0 | NPR, accused of anti-male bias, doubles down.Do you have any data? Pretty sure I have said 5 times now, no, no one has any data except a number, the genders, and general ages. Because all you currently have is the bald-faced assertion that "men can fight, therefore they are all combatants." Not even remotely what I said. In the middle east, in islamic culture and religion, women and children don't fight. They are not combatants. Men are. You get closer to a real figure assuming all males as combatants than assuming everyone killed was a ci… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/14 12:15 AM |
| -1 | NPR, accused of anti-male bias, doubles down.Quite a troll aren't you? | /r/MensRights | 11/08/14 02:06 PM |
| -8 | NPR, accused of anti-male bias, doubles down.Are you offended at the presumption of men being civilians? I am offended that you are presuming things without enough data to support your conclusion. This would imply you have an issue with presumption of innocents in regards to males. Whether someone is involved actively in a war or not does not make them innocent. A man who shelters a soldier in his home is not a combatant but is not innocent in the war. The man who casts his ballot to send another man to war is not a combatant but is not in… | /r/MensRights | 10/08/14 11:44 PM |
| -10 | NPR, accused of anti-male bias, doubles down.Calling a man a fighter does not make it so. Calling a man a civilian does not make it so. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/14 09:21 PM |
| -2 | NPR, accused of anti-male bias, doubles down.So you're saying after a battle or attack, after the bodies have been separated from the weapons, the best estimate of dead fighters is dead adult males? Without any additional information, that is really the only way to determine it. The media should still say "including many non-fighters" though. Why? They have no information to support that. It could be entirely all men who were fighting and it could have been all men who were non-combatants. There is no way to know and that statement would b… | /r/MensRights | 10/08/14 09:21 PM |
| -1 | NPR, accused of anti-male bias, doubles down.There is no way to distinguish. Hamas will publish a body count of how many people were killed, they will give ages and genders, but not who was actively carrying a weapon. It is impossible to distinguish from a number and gender chart who is and is not a combatant. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/14 09:18 PM |
| -8 | NPR, accused of anti-male bias, doubles down.But there is no solid way to determine who was fighting. We get a total death count - of which all men are presumed fighters and women and children are not. Do you think Hamas is going to ever say that anyone who died was actively firing rockets at Israel or that ISIS would ever say that anyone wasn't actively fighting them? The PR involved with who is and isn't a combatant is muddy at best and we cannot rely on the people reporting the statistics to report who was or wasn't. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/14 06:32 PM |
| -11 | NPR, accused of anti-male bias, doubles down.Thy could also simply say, "500 people were killed, many of them innocent civilians." But that isn't a correct formulation of the information then. In this instance, all men, regardless of if they were or were not actively involved in combat, are considered enemy troops. This is because they are the ones fighting. Especially in the Middle East, women are not considered combat capable. So the number takes all men of age, and that is your enemy combatants, and the rest, women and children, are civ… | /r/MensRights | 10/08/14 06:30 PM |
| -1 | Whoopi Defends Stephen A. Smith: If You Hit a Man, Don’t Be Surprised if He Hits BackThe right conclusion for the wrong reasons... | /r/MensRights | 29/07/14 03:25 PM |
| 17 | Wife wants to have our 14-year-old son circumcised. Need help ASAP.Ewww, it's a girl! Seriously, all views are welcome in our discussions, regardless of the gender of the person. This is not a place where discussion is relegated to those who have the equipment. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/14 04:33 PM |
| 5 | Sexual health scientist asks about female privilege at /TwoX. Called a moron, told to fuck off, post removed, and topic is censored.You asked for responses and most people are just bashing you so I will give an honest opinion. I can agree with most, but I will single out the ones I disagree with. 4 - Attractive people, both male and female will receive free things. This is an anyone kind of thing. 13 - Men have contraceptive items as well, none nearly as handy as the pill, but things we can use. There is also research into a male pill. 16 - Men can also get alimony. It is more common for women as they often are the stay at h… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/14 09:23 PM |
| 1 | The hostility to men accused of sexual assault on campus becomes unhingedI also believe that they don't use the word rape and more often use "non-consensual" or other terms that leave vague underlying meaning. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/14 07:58 PM |
| 1 | [via r/SRSsucks] Male feminist suffers cognitive dissonance after experiencing false accusationI know you meant well here, but this is kind of an extension of the whole "a real man does x, y and z" which is the same tactic people use to try and shame men into doing what they want. In fact that's pretty much what you're doing here, although I realize it's coming from a good place. I don't see that at all. Truth is not subjective, despite what anyone will tell you. If I say that the person in front of me is a man, when it is in fact a female, just because I believe it does not make her anym… | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 01:59 PM |
| 0 | [TW: Jezebel] Women should masturbate, but men that masturbate are lonely creepsA dictionary does not convey things that a group does, nor does it define them. Feminism is so much less than equality and we have provided you scores of evidence. You even acknowledge that leading feminist authors, commentators and voices of your movement are not advocating equality, but you cling to the title as if it is some cherished prize. Why do you want to so badly associate yourself with people who do not care about the rights of others and actively try to promote some peoples rights ove… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 04:56 AM |
| 1 | [TW: Jezebel] Women should masturbate, but men that masturbate are lonely creepsI have no choice to identify as a man. It is who I biologically am. I can choose to identify as a feminist. Feminism is an organization of ideas and beliefs. Ideas and beliefs that you claim to not support. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 04:46 AM |
| 2 | [TW: Jezebel] Women should masturbate, but men that masturbate are lonely creepsFrom the entirety of that nasty comment, you don't seem to want to engage in constructive dialogue. Perhaps you are too close to the subject matter? Let's play a word game: I identify as a Nazi, and I don't think being a Jew is bad. Nor, I think, do most Nazis, especially modern Nazism which is the current wave. or I identify as a Klan member, and I don't think being black is bad. Nor, I think, do most Klan members, especially neo-Klan members, which is the current wave. or I identify as a commu… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 01:49 AM |
| 1 | This was in everyone's pidgeon-hole @ Kinder today, written by a parent. I think it's scaremongering but my wife thinks it's fine. What does /r/mensrights think?Your whole premise is that it is rape. This was a daycare center, is it beyond the realm of thought that she had her child with? A dog is a great accomplice for a robbery as well. Just because it is a woman being wary of a man does not mean she instantly thinks rape. I saw nothing in the letter to suggest that. As I said, the wary part is understandable, the rest of the letter is not. | /r/MensRights | 28/05/14 06:43 PM |
| 1 | This was in everyone's pidgeon-hole @ Kinder today, written by a parent. I think it's scaremongering but my wife thinks it's fine. What does /r/mensrights think?No. I said it is bigotry to think a group of people is more likely to be a predator or criminal because of their ethnicity, religion, race, gender or sex. I apologize, it was unclear what your reference was to. Back to the original issue - I still see nothing wrong with her initial assumption (someone is following her, presumably with her child, raised awareness is called for). It is the rest of the letter that goes into hyperventilation mode. I do not remember seeing anything in the letter that… | /r/MensRights | 28/05/14 06:05 PM |
| 1 | This was in everyone's pidgeon-hole @ Kinder today, written by a parent. I think it's scaremongering but my wife thinks it's fine. What does /r/mensrights think?The fact is he was guilty of being male. In this letter, yes we see that as the letter goes on. However, no matter who is walking on a similar path to me, be they a woman, man, Mexican, Asian, Polar Bear or space alien, I am wary of them. The rest of the letter, as I noted was unlikely to be of consequence. And this is called bigotry. Are you calling me a bigot because I am wary of all other human beings? | /r/MensRights | 28/05/14 05:48 PM |
| 1 | This was in everyone's pidgeon-hole @ Kinder today, written by a parent. I think it's scaremongering but my wife thinks it's fine. What does /r/mensrights think?Anyone who engages you in conversation and then proceeds on the same course as you can be threatening. Wary is simply a state of increased awareness. Not necessarily that anything will happen, but making a conscious effort to keep an eye out. For example, if I see a bunch of teenagers wearing gang clothing walk into a 7-11, I am going to be wary of why they are there. I won't immediately walk up to them and accuse them trying to rob the store, but I will take careful note of them. | /r/MensRights | 28/05/14 05:20 PM |
| -3 | This was in everyone's pidgeon-hole @ Kinder today, written by a parent. I think it's scaremongering but my wife thinks it's fine. What does /r/mensrights think?It seems like (what I can only assume is a woman) was rightfully wary of a man that seemed to be taking the same path as herself. Whether she was in an real danger or needed to put out that notice, I would lean on the edge of no. I chat up people with my dog all the time and talk about him - this isn't really out of the norm. | /r/MensRights | 28/05/14 06:00 AM |
| 10 | Mankato football coach fired and arrested for possession of child pornography. "Child pornography" turns out to be picture/video of his own kids playing in the bath.It does happen in the US. The biggest one I can recall was in Philadelphia. There was a plea bargain struck and the records were sealed because it was a minor. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/14 08:25 PM |
| 7 | Mankato football coach fired and arrested for possession of child pornography. "Child pornography" turns out to be picture/video of his own kids playing in the bath.The media played, willingly, into the prosecutors hands. Not so much. The media did what they always do - drum up stories and make a big hoopla about it to get ratings and see advertising. Until we have a protection for the accused persons rights, the media will continues to vilify the accused rather than allow for the presumption of innocence. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/14 08:23 PM |
| 3 | Mankato football coach fired and arrested for possession of child pornography. "Child pornography" turns out to be picture/video of his own kids playing in the bath.I'm pretty sure he was referencing the sexting pictures and not baby pictures. But I'll leave him to clarify it, that was just how I read it | /r/MensRights | 20/04/14 08:21 PM |
| -10 | Mankato football coach fired and arrested for possession of child pornography. "Child pornography" turns out to be picture/video of his own kids playing in the bath.The players refused to play for the replacement coach, holding out until the wrongly accused coach was reinstated. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/14 07:55 PM |
| 8 | Mankato football coach fired and arrested for possession of child pornography. "Child pornography" turns out to be picture/video of his own kids playing in the bath.Prosecutors have extreme leniency to determine who they will and will not prosecute. This is a case where someone should have looked at the evidence and the lack of supporting evidence and thrown it out. This is akin to a prosecutor trying to charge someone with murder and the only evidence they have is that he owns knives similar to the ones that were used in murder and they don't have an alibi. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/14 07:54 PM |
| 21 | Mankato football coach fired and arrested for possession of child pornography. "Child pornography" turns out to be picture/video of his own kids playing in the bath.He already can't go back to his normal life. Stigmas like this will live forever. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/14 07:52 PM |
| 59 | Mankato football coach fired and arrested for possession of child pornography. "Child pornography" turns out to be picture/video of his own kids playing in the bath.http://bc.ctvnews.ca/sexting-b-c-teen-found-guilty-of-child-pornography-1.1633678 There's more like it. Basically kids who send naked pictures to other kids that they took themselves are being charged with creation and distribution of child pornography. It's fairly common and some police are hesitant to get involved unless the pictures are distributed to people other than the original recipient. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/14 07:50 PM |
| 7 | Man writes a satirical and over-the-top article on the modern "empowered" woman. Thoughtcatalog.com publishes the article and some commenters agree with it completelyLooking at other articles on the website, the entire site is satire: "Article" about euthanizing his daughter Food stamps for sex reassignment | /r/MensRights | 16/03/14 05:58 PM |
| 6 | Never forget the AMAmo. The day a top rated AMA was removed simply for being done by an MRA. Today is the one year anniversary.Any you just took me here with that comment. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/14 09:33 AM |
| 2 | Shocking Facts About America's For-Profit Prison IndustryI am really saddened to see your comment so heavily downvoted. It's the truth, whether people want to believe it or not. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 07:03 PM |
| 1 | Feminist suggests that famous men should be denied the right of a jury trial when accused of sexual offences.I wonder if she would offer unconditional support and belief to a woman who claims that she raped them. | /r/MensRights | 08/02/14 01:53 AM |
| 6 | Feminist suggests that famous men should be denied the right of a jury trial when accused of sexual offences.There is a difference between moderation and oppression. You moderate comments which contain things that do not move forward discussion or debate. Things which are insulting, vulgar, threatening. Oppression is removing all voices other than your own or those who agree with you. While we do not have a right to free speech in someone elses domain, they do not have a right to twist words to fit their own meaning. | /r/MensRights | 08/02/14 01:52 AM |
| 3 | "Why Every Woman Should Get a Prenup" Cosmopolitan (USA Feb 2014 issue)I didn't say that every single instance of alimony is uncalled for. No, you said that "alimony laws are fucking insane". Not that alimony needs reform, but the institution is insanity. Things which we do not deem sane are not things for reform, but abolition. Is she a feminist? The article doesn't mention anything about feminism. She often talks about womens empowerment and her movies are just that. For example, she was quoted on legally blond that the movie was the "ultimate exhibition of girl … | /r/MensRights | 19/01/14 11:27 AM |
| 16 | "Why Every Woman Should Get a Prenup" Cosmopolitan (USA Feb 2014 issue)And she's goddamn right. She is a strong successful woman who doesn't rely on a man, she's not leeching from anyone, and she recognizes that alimony laws are fucking insane. Alimony is a necessary construct of divorce. Someone who sacrifices their life for the family should not be penalized if the other wants divorce. If a husband chooses to be the primary parent and a stay at home dad for 15 years and then the wife declares that she wants a divorce, it is immensely difficult for that man to get… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/14 08:22 AM |
| 7 | "Why Every Woman Should Get a Prenup" Cosmopolitan (USA Feb 2014 issue)It is. But part of feminism is it's roots. This is part of the root of feminism which is why I point to it. Feminists today will still point to alimony as a need to empower women who have been "oppressed" by their husbands. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/14 08:16 AM |
| 66 | "Why Every Woman Should Get a Prenup" Cosmopolitan (USA Feb 2014 issue)She called the spousal protection laws as "antiquated". You know, the laws that feminists decried as necessary because of patriarchy. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/14 01:00 AM |
| 17 | A Mother, Feminist turns in to MRA when her son is held to standards she fought for.I don't think that she really admitted she was wrong. This is a very ingrained belief and she only seems impacted by the rape charge and the way the college handled it. There are many pillars of feminism and she has only chipped away at a small one. She did not come out and say that she now rejects feminism or that she is an MRA as the article title so misleadingly states. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/14 05:40 PM |
| 3 | Boy, 15, kills himself after ‘facing expulsion and being put on sex offender registry’ for STREAKING at high school football gameThat list should be reserved for people who are actually a threat. The list shouldn't even exist at all. It is a permanent criminal status that only makes people care less if they commit their particular brand of crime again. This is a pretty good article about it. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/13 10:27 PM |
| 20 | Boys Gone WildAbout 23 years ago, I found myself in school with a teacher who had a notorious history for disliking boys. It was at this young, elementary age, that I discovered sexism. Despite having high marks in school up to this point, I started receiving very low marks. Assignments were turned in near perfect and my grade never reflected it. During a parent teacher conference, my mother was told how terrible she was for simply having a son because "boys can't pay attention in school". Not me, but anyone … | /r/MensRights | 31/07/13 05:18 AM |
| 2 | I am a divorce lawyer, AMAJust because it is a bias held against both parties doesn't make it any less a bias. Also, this was my first foray into your comment thread. I get it. The court goes through long procedures to make everyone swear to tell the truth, there are penalties for not telling the truth, there is legal requirements for the truth, and yet the court presumes that someone is lying. This is no way to run a legal system. If evidence is entered and accepted by the court, then it should be the other parties job … | /r/MensRights | 24/06/13 02:09 AM |
| 1 | I am a divorce lawyer, AMAJust because they exist does not mean that they are prosecuted. There are thousands of laws about guns on the books but we very seldom enforce them. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/13 01:58 AM |
| 1 | I am a divorce lawyer, AMAThis is how the court looks at it: everyone lies. So much for justice being blind. If the court is going into a situation with this type of bias, then they really shouldn't be deciding anything. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/13 01:52 AM |
| 13 | If you get falsely accused of rape, do this.This is especially true where judges are elected or face voters. Someone who lets a "rapist" off the hook, will likely lose his cushy judicial job. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/13 06:14 PM |
| 2 | If you get falsely accused of rape, do this.Do jurors simply erase from their mind hearsay? | /r/MensRights | 17/04/13 06:09 PM |
| 2 | The European Parliament will vote Tuesday on whether or not to begin to take steps to ban all porn in Europe. To end discrimination against women. Whut.Devil's advocate here. They can and would have different laws and punishments for different violations due to different ages. Yeah, we've tried that before. Criminals don't really think about jail time when committing their crimes. Regardless of how long your prison sentence is, you still would lose all your money and equipment to continue making it. Plus, how much money is a girl worth if she is 18, and how much might people pay if you film her when she is 16 or 17? There is an entire genre of … | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 05:09 PM |
| 3 | The European Parliament will vote Tuesday on whether or not to begin to take steps to ban all porn in Europe. To end discrimination against women. Whut.One does wonder what would happen once most porn is driven underground though No regulations means no IDs. Legitimate studios driven underground may hold to some morals, but the newer ones will say "16, 17, 18, doesn't matter". When they run out of that age demographic they just move younger. Since all of it is illegal, they don't care if they are caught with a girl or a woman. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 04:47 PM |
| 5 | The European Parliament will vote Tuesday on whether or not to begin to take steps to ban all porn in Europe. To end discrimination against women. Whut.Not really, California keeps actively pushing porn out. Los Angeles just voted to require all porn made there to have condoms so most studious just moved outside the county. Now they are trying to push it at the state legislature. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 04:43 PM |
| 2 | The European Parliament will vote Tuesday on whether or not to begin to take steps to ban all porn in Europe. To end discrimination against women. Whut.I think it is funny that there will be vast unintended consequences. If all the sudden normal pornography is illegal, why would anyone care the age of the person appearing in the now illegal material? Child porn will become a HUGE problem as studios aren't going to stop making it and since it is going to be done in backrooms, no one is going to check ID. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 04:41 PM |
| 1 | You know you've got problems when your misandrist views can make Sean Hannity seem like a reasonable guy.You're moving the goal posts and generally being ridiculous and paranoid. Uh, no...I'm not. The entire premise of this discussion is about how gun ownership is supposed to prevent interpersonal violence, such as rape. Keep the discussion at that because I really don't care how you feel about the steely piece of freedom you purchased for yourself at Walmart. I am responding to someone elses tangent on the discussion. Furthermore, I don't even own a gun. So please, keep your poorly placed and assu… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 06:52 AM |
| 2 | You know you've got problems when your misandrist views can make Sean Hannity seem like a reasonable guy.There's never enough guns for them and it's never an "option" so much as the "only valid option" beyond laying on your back and letting someone have their way with you. This is a very poor framing of the debate. I'm a Marine Corps veteran, I've qualified as expert in rifle and pistol, as well as being a SAW gunner and using an M2 .50 cal in combat. Yet personally, I find the gun-rights crowd to be closer to the full-tilt knee-jerk paranoid conspiracy theorist bent than people who are even remote… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/13 08:14 PM |
| 2 | You know you've got problems when your misandrist views can make Sean Hannity seem like a reasonable guy.The "arm women to the gills" crowd blindly ignores legitimate rape such as marital rape by suggesting that at any given moment, the proper way for a woman to defend herself from a potential rape is to blow the guy's head off. This is the most misguided statement I have ever read. The idea is not to "arm women to the gills" but to allow them the option to choose a gun for protection. The key there is "option", as in a choice. Currently, in most situations, women are prohibited from carrying a gun… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/13 07:49 PM |
| 7 | You know you've got problems when your misandrist views can make Sean Hannity seem like a reasonable guy.Hannity's idea is pretty stupid though. Encourage women to kill men if they say they felt they might be raped. Hannity, and his progun guest were talking about violent rape. His prodisarming guest was talking about situations of perceived rape (that is, rape in which the women does not want to have sex but does nothing to indicate otherwise such as saying no). Because they were talking about 2 different situations, one came off like a looney because she didn't frame her conversation correctly. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/13 03:58 PM |
| 7 | You know you've got problems when your misandrist views can make Sean Hannity seem like a reasonable guy.Actually, the Army is one of the safest places for women because they aren't in active combat. They suffer far fewer deaths and injuries than their male counterparts. Now that they are actively being deployed for combat scenarios, we'll see if that changes. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/13 03:55 PM |
| 0 | Victim is labeled a predator because he's a boy. Boy is a 4 year old preschooler who received oral sex from a 5 year old female preschooler.Given that the Church is ELCA, it wouldn't surprise me if there was worse going on. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/13 04:30 PM |
| 6 | Just in case people missed out on the story of Bridezilla. (X-Post SRSsucks)Guys father dies, woman claims that the father was a misogynistic asshole, husband to be goes into rage, drops elitist woman, throws party. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/13 04:39 PM |
| 18 | Just in case people missed out on the story of Bridezilla. (X-Post SRSsucks)Hopefully he stays far away from her, forever. Hopefully EVERYONE stays far away from her, forever. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/13 04:36 PM |
| 1 | Huff Post profiles 36 cases of teacher-student rape last year, the majority of which were perpetuated by woman teachers. Maybe the wrong gender gets stereotyped when they want to work with children.Actually, 2000 years ago in subsistence cultures, both parents took part in raising children, just like about everything else. It was what was done, because it needed to be. In subsistence cultures, yes. The Romans and Greeks (along with other cultures) built up infrastructure and schools where you had women as caretakers over children. The female slaves were usually the caretakers of children too. When they came of age they followed gender roles and men went into hard labor (farming, metal mani… | /r/MensRights | 15/01/13 07:15 PM |
| 4 | Huff Post profiles 36 cases of teacher-student rape last year, the majority of which were perpetuated by woman teachers. Maybe the wrong gender gets stereotyped when they want to work with children.Oh come on now, you know that teenage boys are using their patriarchy to oppress the teachers and force themselves upon an adult woman poor helpless girl. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/13 04:47 PM |
| 2 | Huff Post profiles 36 cases of teacher-student rape last year, the majority of which were perpetuated by woman teachers. Maybe the wrong gender gets stereotyped when they want to work with children.If I had to guess, it would be that the rates of sexual abuse probably correlate pretty closely to actual representation in the schools. Representation could be, but in many schools there are as many male male teachers as female. In most of my schools it was at least 40% male teachers. I would think that there are 3 factors that play into the prevelance of women teachers with students: Access - most of these stories are with teenage boys who (from my own personal experience) think sex is pretty … | /r/MensRights | 15/01/13 04:46 PM |
| 2 | Huff Post profiles 36 cases of teacher-student rape last year, the majority of which were perpetuated by woman teachers. Maybe the wrong gender gets stereotyped when they want to work with children.Because a womans role 50 years ago and 2000 years ago was to raise children. Because of this the natural role of women is to be with children and feminism has only reinforced this with encouraging women to be teachers. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/13 04:40 PM |
| 16 | Askreddit thread asks "what's the worst thing you've ever been accused of?". Thread EXPLODES with false rape allegations.Explodes doesn't mean "Brought to the top" | /r/MensRights | 09/01/13 10:43 PM |
| 5 | Askreddit thread asks "what's the worst thing you've ever been accused of?". Thread EXPLODES with false rape allegations.In addition to the rape comes these kind of stories too from that same thread. Ugh. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/13 10:42 PM |
| 6 | Why do feminists and mens rights activists so frequently represent each other according to their most extreme elements?Why does each side claim to fight for equality while accusing the other of trying to gain an unequal advantage? This is the art of negotiation. Let's say we are splitting some money we found on the street, $100. If I start with, let's split it 50/50 then the other person come back and states that it should be all theirs because xyz reasons. You slowly start to concede a percentage to them because you started at reasonable and in order for the other side to accept a deal, you have to give in dema… | /r/MensRights | 29/11/12 07:24 PM |
| 0 | California voters have just approved a new, dangerous way to criminalize sex, spread hysteria about "sex offenders", and marginalize menI realize that it's an infringement on freedom in either case. Only a moron thinks putting on a different hat suddenly makes an infringement on freedom lose its nature. "Yeah, that was the state government though!" Whether the state or federal government is the part infringing is irrelevant to the question of whether freedom is infringed. In the context of what we are talking about, yes it is. A state is able to pick and choose its own laws. In this instance the people of the state chose to inst… | /r/MensRights | 08/11/12 08:55 PM |
| 0 | California voters have just approved a new, dangerous way to criminalize sex, spread hysteria about "sex offenders", and marginalize menRight. The freedom to voluntarily associate is not a freedom infringed when the government prohibits voluntary association between certain individuals. Perhaps you fail to realize the role of the federal government versus the role of state government. Right. The freedom to secede from the union, voluntarily associate, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom itself (out of prison), freedom from indentured servitude (draft), among quite a few others were not infringed during the Civil War… | /r/MensRights | 08/11/12 05:24 PM |
| 0 | California voters have just approved a new, dangerous way to criminalize sex, spread hysteria about "sex offenders", and marginalize men. Absolutely fabulous retort! One of these things is not like the other, one of these things is not the same. You claimed to have not read what I said. But then proceeded to tell me what I said and how I was wrong. So tell me which it is, did you lie about not reading my whole comment or are you intentionally misrepresenting my post? Which part was a non-sequitur? All of them. Neither was state granted monopolies to their friends? Not a freedom granted nor taken State granted monopolies through … | /r/MensRights | 07/11/12 08:07 PM |
| 0 | California voters have just approved a new, dangerous way to criminalize sex, spread hysteria about "sex offenders", and marginalize menNo thanks. I'm not going to bother. If you wanted to carry on a rational or productive discussion, you wouldn't have started it with this manipulative, abusive rhetoric. It isn't rhetoric. It seriously was a non-seuitur. Do you know what that is? I didn't even read past this sentence. A truly enlightened way to debate someone. Such bravery! doubt I will have a productive discussion with someone who asserts that 1) chattel slavery didn't exist from the beginning of the U.S. until around 1865 2) a… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/12 07:37 PM |
| 10 | California voters have just approved a new, dangerous way to criminalize sex, spread hysteria about "sex offenders", and marginalize menThis fucking scares me. While I don't know that they ever would, but IF any of my children ever engaged in prostitution, I become guilty by association simply by living in the same household. This is the most disgraceful bill ever passed in the history of the US and makes me so angry that people are so uninformed. For those non-residents who don't know, every proposition here gets people who are both for and against it to speak about it and then it is published in a booklet and sent to every reg… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/12 04:57 PM |
| -1 | California voters have just approved a new, dangerous way to criminalize sex, spread hysteria about "sex offenders", and marginalize menYes-however don't think for a second that if Kalifornia can't say that somehow part of this crime was committed in their state (think internet traffic, like Google) that they won't charge you here. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/12 04:52 PM |
| 1 | California voters have just approved a new, dangerous way to criminalize sex, spread hysteria about "sex offenders", and marginalize menSo slavery wasn't an important knock against "actual freedoms"? I didn't realize slavery existed in 1920. Random rant on other non-sequiturs It did not require the government taxing its citizens to implement reform of its policies. Freedom of your pocketbook is where it all starts. Currently I am in a situation where my relationship is borderline abusive but because I am dependent upon my other half for financial support I am trapped. This is where the US is right now. So many people are trapped… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/12 04:51 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter