Lajho Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Women are not opressed, we are You're just proving my statement that you're delusional. Stop humiliating yourself already, it's pathetic.	/r/MensRights	06/05/19 02:53 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are You're wasting your own time. I have nothing to do with it.	/r/MensRights	06/05/19 02:52 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are No, don't project. You're the one that ignored the evidence I provided. Nothing I said was biased and dishonest, but your comments were. Dude, go check yourself into a mental hospital. You have to be hallucinating or some shit to be this delusional. As I said, I'm not interested in talking to you any longer, you're already demonstrated that you're a moron without the capability of seeing reality for what it is.	/r/MensRights	06/05/19 02:51 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are I'm not going to go dig for evidence for you when you've already demonstrated that you're extremely biased and unlikely to do anything but ignore it regardless. It's impossible to honestly believe that male privilege doesn't exist. Every demographic that exists has privileges, it's just a fact. Literally the simple idea that men are superior in terms of biological strength and size is male privilege. That's what privilege means. If you're going to ignore reality like that then there's no point i…	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 09:53 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are Apparently explicitly stating that the evidence was in another comment prior to that one has been redefined as "expecting you to magically know." I guess I missed the memo.	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 09:28 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are You tell me, I never asked what your gender was. And I'm not the one getting angry and offended by facts and playing mental gymnastics, or circlejerking. Chill yourself.	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 08:37 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are Is that supposed to absolve you of responsibility?	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 08:20 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are Lmfao that's fucking hilarious. "Get out of here, we don't want your facts!" Clearly, you're right. This isn't a sub for men's rights, it's a sub to bitch and whine about women and circlejerk to delusional nonsense. At some point you have to wake up and smell the daisies, when every argument you have is fallacious and/or refutes your own claims then you're not on the side of truth.	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 08:04 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are But you gave no evidence. Why are you lying? I obviously did, why are you lying and ignoring it? You just said "Men aren't nearly as likely to experience sexual assault or rape." But gave no link or evidence. Yeah, and I linked the evidence in another comment ages ago the first time someone asked me about gender inequalities. How about you try reading it for once instead of sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "la la la?"	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 07:40 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are Lmfao, "stop calling the condescending misogynists delusional, people are fragile" Then why are you defending condescending misogynists? So stupid.	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 05:53 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are Ignoring the evidence I've given =/= no evidence. Keep deluding yourself though, please.	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 05:51 PM
-1	Women are not opressed, we are Dude you're obviously delusional. There's not even a point in this conversation anymore, you've even gone into denial to the extent of claiming your fallacies are valid and straw man arguments are correct. I can't reason you out of a position you clearly haven't reasoned yourself into.	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 04:29 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are It's not about feelings. It's blatantly obvious given that every argument amounts to "I didn't click the links and look at the evidence, therefore the evidence doesn't exist," and giving men a universal free pass and always counting anything as oppression while women's issues are held to an impossible standard even on the same exact issues. i.e. If I give anecdotal evidence and link to an entire group of people who experience both genders with universal corroborating testament that what I said i…	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 11:39 AM
0	Women are not opressed, we are Tolerance by definition requires intolerance of intolerance. Secondly you're not even using the word properly, this has nothing to do with tolerance, unless you're admitting that you're misogynist and in denial, not that it wasn't already apparent.	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 11:19 AM
0	Women are not opressed, we are Nah you're just delusional and misogynist. I'm sorry reality bothers you so much.	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 11:14 AM
0	Women are not opressed, we are Lmfao you're straight up delusional. Ignoring evidence that contradicts what you want to believe doesn't magically make it disappear.	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 11:14 AM
2	Women are not opressed, we are I agree. I just use oppression because if everything in the OP qualifies as oppression then so does what women experience, and a lot of sexist people are crawling all over this thread making fallacious arguments after fallacious arguments trying to enforce a double standard where men get a free pass and everything is oppression but any inequalities women face are "just unimportant because reasons" and therefore "not oppressed." And that's the problem with this sub, exactly as you said. There is …	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 09:57 AM
1	Women are not opressed, we are You're not wrong. But if we began every post with an obligatory statement about how women have their problems too, it would get very tiresome very quickly. You're straw manning. If I go on a blog to complain about issues white people have, and title it "Racism against black people doesn't exist" or "Black people aren't oppressed" I'm factually wrong and lying for no reason. Simply title it what it is instead of being sexist and throwing them under the bus. Pretty much everyone has been raised on…	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 09:53 AM
0	Women are not opressed, we are Most of what you said is either mostly or completely false Proof by assertion fallacy. The link you gave doesn't support your claim at all, and that's a single example. LOL....so you mean, the fact that male victims are discriminated against or even arrested when calling the police for help, is a "privilege"? Straw man fallacy. You're also fallaciously using female privileges as claims that male privilege doesn't exist. LOL...nice "privilege". It seems to me your issue is that you fail to compre…	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 09:50 AM
-1	Women are not opressed, we are First one is not oppression double standard fallacy. Then men are not oppressed by your own definition. Second one is just a straight out lie. Proof by assertion fallacy. I demonstrated that it is fact in multiple ways, you just refused to read it because you don't want to be proven wrong	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 09:44 AM
1	Women are not opressed, we are I'm not going to respond to anything here until we get this out of the way: I also don't have to fully agree with the OP (newsflash) I've responded to this politely what feels like 7 times. So now I'm doing in the asshole way: No fucking shit. Newsflash: My stance is that the OP is wrong, if you're not contesting that, then stop making endless delusional and fallacious arguments to the point of humiliating yourself for, by your own admission, no actual reason or intent to debate, because I'm not…	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 02:20 AM
1	Women are not opressed, we are Well if people are dying then it's a problem... not many women die from a stranger yelling "nice tits" out a window. Fallacy of relative privation and once again, double standard. You just disproved your own stance that legal oppression even matters and much of the OP in the process if you think this logic is valid. You just asserted that anything that doesn't involve people dying is a nonissue. So, rape is fine, child molestation no problem, child abuse is morally justifiable, genital mutilatio…	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 01:20 AM
-6	Women are not opressed, we are Men aren't nearly as likely to experience sexual assault or rape. Men are perceived to be more competent than women. Men are raised to be assertive and confident, etc. Men who are bad drivers aren't told it's because they're men. Men aren't required to wear makeup to be seen as competent. Men aren't expected to be unrealistically thin or even underweight to be not be considered fat. Men aren't held to unrealistic body standards in general i.e. simultaneously being very skinny but having biology-…	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 01:05 AM
1	Women are not opressed, we are How do you define equality then? How you feel? The same way you define it to figure out that the non-legal issues in the OP are about equality. But many also do. Again, many also don't. You're special pleading or at least missing the point here. If those things are oppression, so are the non-legal issues women face. There's an obvious double standard. Women aren't oppressed and men are, legally. It's just a fact. And it's also a fact that oppression and inequality aren't exclusive to legality. L…	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 12:45 AM
1	Women are not opressed, we are Missed this one before: So you were cat-called but you choose to ignore that because muh narrative? The fuck are you even talking about. How did I in any way ignore it, I explicitly pointed it out.	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 12:42 AM
0	Women are not opressed, we are I'm gonna preface this by just saying, you are very clearly super biased and defensive in this response and I'd suggest reevaluating how you came to the conclusions you outline here. Also let me know if I missed something, this was long af. but saying men are oppressed doesn't mean they are oppressed by women or should hate them though... It seems like you're kicking a straw man, none of that was my point at all. And men don't get called sugar, baby, sweetheart honey etc by people? I got called …	/r/MensRights	23/04/19 12:32 AM
1	Women are not opressed, we are So you just linked back to your OP... It was supposed to be this I guess I hit the wrong permalink. It's basically directly under that though, don't see how you missed it. Well both sides have it shitty yes, but I would argue that women are not legally oppressed because they were allowed to fight for their rights (or just fought for them) and got a lot of rights men never have had (like the ones I listed before) Sure but legality = actual equality, so you're just agreeing that the claim women ar…	/r/MensRights	22/04/19 11:53 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are depends on how you define sexual harassment. For example a guy saying a woman looks nice is not sexual harassment. I would say it would have to be repeated, after being told to stop and would have to clearly have intent to threaten or otherwise imply harm. In the workplace companies pretty much universally consider comments like this to be sexual harassment depending on the circumstances, and frankly I don't think being told to stop is necessary. It's essentially the same issue with saying it's …	/r/MensRights	22/04/19 11:48 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/bg5sw3/women_are_not_opressed_we_are/elj22cu/?context=3	/r/MensRights	22/04/19 11:28 PM
3	Women are not opressed, we are But the feminist narrative is that all men are rapists and patriarchs, have no feelings, always act so as to dis-empower women ... the list of bad characteristics and evil deeds imputed to all males goes on and on, quite dismally. There is no universal feminist narrative, and many people here are guilty of making the same sort of wild generalizations about women. Like, I don't call myself a feminist because of exactly this inaccurate generalization but otherwise I would and I consider myself one…	/r/MensRights	22/04/19 11:25 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are I know you haven't read it yet, but are you saying that sexual harassment isn't a "real problem" because I'd strongly beg to differ.	/r/MensRights	22/04/19 11:07 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are All of this is anecdotal though. I haven't done this. This sub hasn't done this... and I have no evidence this was done at all. Fair enough, though just in case, I'm not sure if that's where this person is about to go but: Then we need to first define what is essential. x	/r/MensRights	22/04/19 11:06 PM
2	Women are not opressed, we are Then we need to first define what is essential. It has been defined. Something along the lines of "extremely important" or "absolutely 100% required" "necessary." I'd say it's absolutely 100% required that women in all of society aren't bleeding all over the place, and all over themselves, and on carpet and the bed and so on and so forth. Especially from a public health standpoint. The idea that not doing so is a "luxury" is ridiculous to me. Are you seriously about to argue that it's not? Give …	/r/MensRights	22/04/19 11:04 PM
1	Women are not opressed, we are Anytime, yeah. I agree completely. But I also just noticed the response below mine whose first two words is "You're right" then got upvoted, seemingly by the people who think I'm not right. It makes no sense to me, I'm kind of lost in that regard lol.	/r/MensRights	22/04/19 10:37 PM
2	Women are not opressed, we are "I think we shouldn't pay sales tax on essential items and pads, tampons, and the like are demonstrably essential" is the argument every time I've heard this though, nobody claims it's oppression in an institutional sense, but most of the time when women bring up this argument men will jump on the bandwagon to immediately argue that it's not necessary and make ridiculous arguments laced with sexist insults against it, so that's probably where the idea of it being an issue of sexism and inequalit…	/r/MensRights	22/04/19 10:33 PM
2	Women are not opressed, we are Exactly, thank you, it seems like you're the one of the few or maybe even the only one here who understood my point.	/r/MensRights	22/04/19 10:27 PM
0	Women are not opressed, we are I know but that's not really relevant to what I said. I'm not arguing with the content of the post itself (I didn't even read the entirity of it, either, just skimmed over the top half really) but I understood that aspect of their point. It's the title I take issue with. OP's doing the exact same thing and acting like they're superior or more knowledgeable for it. It's also kind of sad that, I get downvoted for pointing this out, which is the same thing people complain about happening in feminis…	/r/MensRights	22/04/19 10:15 PM
-11	Women are not opressed, we are Special pleading by exclusively citing the ways men are oppressed and ignoring the ways women are demonstrably just as oppressed makes you no different than the people who claim men aren't oppressed at all. Both sides are oppressed, and it's shitty in both cases. Women have privileges in some areas and disadvantages and stigmas in others. Men have privileges in some areas and disadvantages and stigmas in others. To claim otherwise is to be in denial of reality. It's the equivalent of black peopl…	/r/MensRights	22/04/19 07:54 PM
1	Apparently threatening to chop off a mans genitals and deposit them where the sun doesn’t shine is considered ‘harassment WITHOUT violence’ Look this is going nowhere. You can keep taking little bits out of context and ignoring the parts that prove you wrong to pretend it didn't happen, but I'm done listening. You're not fooling anybody, we all know what you said and what you clearly meant, I'm done arguing about it with an 8 year old. your fetish with violence has nothing to do with me or anything Red herring. Making up stupid shit to go on tangents about isn't an argument.	/r/MensRights	29/06/18 08:18 AM
1	Apparently threatening to chop off a mans genitals and deposit them where the sun doesn’t shine is considered ‘harassment WITHOUT violence’ You sir, are a liar. Red herring Demonstrably false. You're the one being intentionally dishonest and pretending that the quote wasn't clearly made as a response to argue that threats are violent. You claimed a threat was violent, then used the fact that it's illegal as an argument as to why they are violent. You're not fooling anyone but yourself here. Stop doing mental gymnastics and learn to admit when you're wrong.	/r/MensRights	26/06/18 02:11 AM
1	I just finished “The Red Pill” and I just want to post this to solidify that I am no longer a feminist. No, I'm calm. You're just being defensive and taking correction as an attack. And frankly, it's pretty ridiculous.	/r/MensRights	26/06/18 02:02 AM
1	Apparently threatening to chop off a mans genitals and deposit them where the sun doesn’t shine is considered ‘harassment WITHOUT violence’ Piracy on the high seas is a very violent crime. I'm not sure whether to call this a straw man or a red herring, but either way, you know that isn't what I was talking about, you just want to avoid the point I'm making. Is it violent to download a movie or song onto your computer/phone? Can you joust at that strawman somewhere else? Threats are also illegal. That's not a straw man. It IS your argument. "It's illegal, so it's violent" right there. I quoted you word for word.	/r/MensRights	26/06/18 01:57 AM
-3	Cambridge teacher wears 'feminist fashion' to work. If a straight white man showed up like this, he would absolutely be fired for sexual harassment. Double standards. Because they are in a different category. Yes. A different category. That we have made up, as a society. Even if you claim that sexuality only objectively applies to genitalia, which is true, like I said, being related to sex does absolutely nothing for your argument. So what if they are sexual? Why would we not get used to looking at them? You're not only ignoring the facts but you're making ridiculous claims that don't add up with no evidence whatsoever and pretending you're magically right be…	/r/MensRights	17/06/18 08:51 AM
-4	Cambridge teacher wears 'feminist fashion' to work. If a straight white man showed up like this, he would absolutely be fired for sexual harassment. Double standards. "It's no longer sexual" Demonstrably false. I don't know a single woman who would agree to that statement. And yes, because those places are considered SEXUAL. Yet, hm, odd, grabbing a woman's elbow isn't sexual assault. It's not even assault, or battery. It's not even illegal. I wonder why that is. Because it's not a sexual body part. Touching people just anywhere isn't a crime. And the fact that you have to note that touching a "woman" specifically is a crime to exclude men is pretty pathetic.…	/r/MensRights	17/06/18 08:19 AM
3	Aussie Feminist defends double standard in groping and sexual assault. Woman gropes man's genitals, but that's ok... Not that I disagree with what you're saying here, but it doesn't matter whether the "social context" is different or not and anyone who claims it does is a fucking sociopath. Even IF men had the mythical privilege feminists claim we do, that doesn't magically redefine what sexual assault and rape are. I don't care if a 10 year old groped fucking Genghis Khan, rape is rape, assault is assault. I don't know why it's so hard for these retards to understand.	/r/MensRights	17/06/18 08:06 AM
3	I thought the world was moving towards science, skepticism and evidence based decision making. But this societal push towards believing someone’s accusations without evidence is a huge step back. Unfortunately, the culprit is human nature. Humans are prone to believing whatever they hear first, even if it's disproven later. It's called anchor bias.	/r/MensRights	17/06/18 07:33 AM
-1	Cambridge teacher wears 'feminist fashion' to work. If a straight white man showed up like this, he would absolutely be fired for sexual harassment. Double standards. > If toplessness is now legal, then it is no longer considered sexual by the legal system. Look saying something doesn't magically make it true. And frankly, not only are you wrong, but it shouldn't be true either. All of your arguments about different cultures are completely irrelevant. We aren't a tribe in Africa and our culture is different. There, tits aren't sexual. Here, they are. Demonstrably so. I don't think it matters that a few select feminists here and there have no problem being t…	/r/MensRights	17/06/18 07:30 AM
2	Discussion: False rape accusations have significantly worse consequences for the victim than rape does And all that is assuming you even tell anyone you were raped. Lots of victims don't. I wasn't raped, but I was sexually assaulted. I've never told anyone and I never wanted to report it. I don't regret not reporting it either. I healed on my own, no support, no therapy, nothing, and I was back to normal even though it took a while. Maybe a year? The only thing I had to deal with from other people was my twat parents relentlessly nagging me to talk to "them" day after day ignoring the countless t…	/r/MensRights	17/06/18 07:04 AM
1	Apparently threatening to chop off a mans genitals and deposit them where the sun doesn’t shine is considered ‘harassment WITHOUT violence’ So is piracy, does that make it a violent crime? Just because something is illegal or mean doesn't make it violent. A threat of violence is not violence.	/r/MensRights	17/06/18 06:40 AM
1	Dr phil telling a male victim of domestic abuse not to hit his girlfriend back for abusing him because she's a woman (a woman who has been in military and knows how to fight) It should be obvious. I'm not sure what pisses me off more, the fact that Dr. Full of shit said it or that the guy is actually agreeing with him. Hopefully he just doesn't know what else to do and doesn't believe a word of it. Poor dude needs a hug.	/r/MensRights	17/06/18 06:24 AM
1	Dr phil telling a male victim of domestic abuse not to hit his girlfriend back for abusing him because she's a woman (a woman who has been in military and knows how to fight) Well as long as we designate women to do it all Dr. Cunt won't mind a bit. Apparently he doesn't mind a good ol' chair to the face either, so we can throw in a couple of those for this poor guy.	/r/MensRights	17/06/18 06:19 AM
1	I just finished “The Red Pill” and I just want to post this to solidify that I am no longer a feminist. That's a common way of thinking but it's completely flawed. I'm an atheist and I have strong negative opinions of religion, but face to face or even online, I won't necessarily disclose that information in most situations. Even just on reddit alone I've only spoken about it in a couple of subs out of the dozen or so I frequent and deflect when it's brought up. By your logic that's because I'm not confident that I'm right. But the reality is that daring to admit to being an atheist tends to mean …	/r/MensRights	17/06/18 06:10 AM
-1	I just finished “The Red Pill” and I just want to post this to solidify that I am no longer a feminist. I swear I could make a dumb post on showerthoughts about orange juice or something and someone somewhere would read it and say "2 day old throwaway. Must be troll, not buying it."	/r/MensRights	17/06/18 04:32 AM
1	Alan Woodward, who leads a suicide prevention charity in Australia named "Lifeline", stands by notorious misandrist Clementine Ford No, you refuse to read the multiple answers handed to you on a silver platter because you don't like them and would rather delude yourself that reality isn't reality. You are either a troll or so ideologically blind you can't see how hopelessly retarded you are. Bye.	/r/MensRights	03/06/18 04:13 AM
1	Alan Woodward, who leads a suicide prevention charity in Australia named "Lifeline", stands by notorious misandrist Clementine Ford The mutation, when it occurs, is dominant, Everything possible trait humans have originates from mutation. Humans having 10 fingers is a result of mutation. Humans wouldn't have eyes if not for mutation, humans wouldn't even exist at all if not for mutation. Nor would any species that exists on this planet, sentient or not. Saying that something is a mutation doesn't change the nature of the argument. You're just repeating the same thing I've already said, the only difference is that I understan…	/r/MensRights	03/06/18 04:03 AM
1	Alan Woodward, who leads a suicide prevention charity in Australia named "Lifeline", stands by notorious misandrist Clementine Ford I'm completely ignoring the first paraphrase because you completely ignored my actual argument and pretended that me correcting you was my argument when it obviously wasn't. Yes it is impossible for this to be a dominant trait, it's impossible for it to be a recessive trait, given the rate it happens, it can only happen when an error occurs, how is that even relevant? Uh, what are you even talking about? No, having 12 fingers doesn't occur when there's an error. Like I said it's the dominant tra…	/r/MensRights	02/06/18 10:44 AM
1	Alan Woodward, who leads a suicide prevention charity in Australia named "Lifeline", stands by notorious misandrist Clementine Ford It's not over 99%. It's 97-98% possibly less. It's over 99% only if you count only transgender people because that amounts to something like .58%. But the studies never account for all of the other ways that people can have sex and gender that are different, like intersex people, nonbinary people, you might also count people whose chomosomes are XY when they have female genetalia and they identify as female and so on, in which case the number gets smaller yet. There are other cases too but there…	/r/MensRights	31/05/18 08:02 AM
1	Alan Woodward, who leads a suicide prevention charity in Australia named "Lifeline", stands by notorious misandrist Clementine Ford You have not given any real answers to my questions I've given plenty of answers to your questions, you just don't like them so you've chosen to disregard them. no articles Articles aren't proof of anything. Studies are. I already did link you an article and the only reason I did was because all the studies were directly linked to in the article. I provided the article specifically because I thought it might be easier for you to understand and would take less reading to find what I was linking i…	/r/MensRights	31/05/18 03:59 AM
1	Alan Woodward, who leads a suicide prevention charity in Australia named "Lifeline", stands by notorious misandrist Clementine Ford You're just repeating the same arguments over and over that I've already responded to without addressing my responses at all. I'm not going to keep retyping the same 4 things over and over hoping you'll eventually stop being retarded and answer them. So bye.	/r/MensRights	19/05/18 04:17 AM
1	Alan Woodward, who leads a suicide prevention charity in Australia named "Lifeline", stands by notorious misandrist Clementine Ford Brain cancer can CAUSE mental illness, one is the physical issue the other the functional result. Yet brain cancer ISN'T a mental illness. I don't even know what to say to you anymore. If you don't get it, then you just don't get it. You're beyond hope at this point. they are linked traits I never disagreed with that. But "linked" doesn't mean "the same." For two concepts to be linked, they have to, by definition, be different things. You're just disproving your own stance with your poor argumen…	/r/MensRights	18/05/18 06:40 PM
1	Alan Woodward, who leads a suicide prevention charity in Australia named "Lifeline", stands by notorious misandrist Clementine Ford Is everything to do with the brain a disorder, no. But anything that causes the individual distress, or interferes with their or others lives is. By that logic, brain cancer is a mental illness. So in other words, yes, you do think that everything that involves the brain is a mental illness. I said they are the same for most people, they are different but tightly linked things You just contradicted yourself. You said they are the same thing, but then directly after you said they are different. W…	/r/MensRights	17/05/18 03:34 PM
1	Alan Woodward, who leads a suicide prevention charity in Australia named "Lifeline", stands by notorious misandrist Clementine Ford Bi-polar is a mental disorder caused by an underlying issue with the brain, in terms of specific neuro transmitters, we actually have more evidence for it to be a physical condition (in that we have isolated the differences in brain chemistry). You're going around in circles. Do you understand that everything concerning the brain isn't a mental illness/disorder? Or don't you? Yes or no? Trying to invalidate a perfectly good analogy for biological differences using cookies is a poor attempt, biol…	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 10:06 PM
2	This Is Why Men Don't Want To Date Modern Women I always want to joke that I'll start growing a second dick asap but I never do. Afraid of the reaction that might get.	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 09:53 PM
2	Alan Woodward, who leads a suicide prevention charity in Australia named "Lifeline", stands by notorious misandrist Clementine Ford That's what I meant, it's mental in that the brain is involved, like being bi-polar. But it's not like bipolar. Bipolar is a mental disorder. Transgenderism is not. That's why I didn't get it the first time, because even if you agree that it's mental in the same way brain cancer is mental, you're using mental illnesses as examples rather than physical conditions, so it's not describing your point well at all. Nope A small minority who deviate from the norm do not invalidate the norm Yes it does.…	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 09:07 PM
2	Alan Woodward, who leads a suicide prevention charity in Australia named "Lifeline", stands by notorious misandrist Clementine Ford Mostly the former, becasue it makes no logical sense, and is utterly unsupported by the evidence. It's completely contradicted by the evidence actually. And what I hate about it is that as a trans dude, people who say this are just saying that trans people don't exist. If gender roles are just made up by society then how exactly does it make sense that I can be born with gender that doesn't match my sex, when no such concept of gender actually exists? How can a gender be 'wrong' if I can just ma…	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 08:30 PM
-2	Alan Woodward, who leads a suicide prevention charity in Australia named "Lifeline", stands by notorious misandrist Clementine Ford What in particular is wrong with it to you? Do you think the problem is that they're essentially saying that gender is just a made up social constuct and none of it really exists? Or if your problem that it refers to transgender and nonbinary people as being valid? If the former, I agree it's nonsense. If the latter, whether transgender people exist or not is no longer a subject of debate. We understand the cause of the condition and what it is, and we already know the best way to treat it and i…	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 02:36 AM
7	The Subtle Sexism Of Your Open Plan Office \| When you look at the world through a feminist lens, you see sexism EVERYWHERE. Yeah, at the very beginning I could see what they were saying. I'm an introvert. I like my privacy, and I really hate super open places like that. I understood why people wouldn't like it and would feel watched, because that's 100% me. I was confused how this had anything to do with sexism or what the title was on about. But then I read further and they went right off the deep end.	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 02:20 AM
2	Natalie Portman: "There are no rules about what it means to be a feminist, or a good mother" Well that's what they all tell you, but once you get into specifics it's usually made clear they want furthest thing possible from equality of the sexes. Even if you agree that feminism is about equality of the sexes, the second you say something they don't like suddenly you're "not a real feminist" and the definition changes so that you don't count anymore.	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 02:09 AM
4	Natalie Portman: "There are no rules about what it means to be a feminist, or a good mother" The dumbest thing about it is that even if they were actually right, nothing they do would be helping then either. If 'straight white men' are really the ones with all the power, you don't go about getting more power by pissing everyone with power off, demonizing them, and throwing whiny tantrums when people don't demonstrate blind obedience. You need to change their minds, and that's not how you do that either.	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 02:07 AM
2	Democratic Party doubles down on stupid - goes All-In on Gender Politics for midterm This isnt so clear cut. The cost to force gender-neutral bathrooms is a burden that will be both financial, spacial, timely, and political. It will also open a platform for every other ridiculous gender to advocate on behalf of their “identity”. I feel like I have at least a little authority to speak on this because I am/was trans. I don't actually care about gender neutral bathrooms. Even if someone considers themselves nonbinary or whatever, there's no reason they can't just pick whichever one…	/r/MensRights	15/05/18 08:34 PM
2	Women are better drivers than men Pretty sure what she means is "OMG, nobody's worshiped women in this sub in the past 12 minutes!!! Sexism abounds!"	/r/MensRights	15/05/18 08:18 PM
1	Feminism, why are people against it? All i did was point out the fact that his example was terrible. It wasn't terrible. Everyone else understood it's purpose. You're just a moron. As it didn't add much and he wasn't willing to add to it. He said everything that he needed to say for the purpose of his argument. There was no reason to add to it. The invasive and completely inappropriate comments and questions you decided to harass him with were the least relevant thing to the conversation. He didn't state the situation for you to "a…	/r/AntiFeminists	29/10/17 08:33 AM
1	Genderrr Agenderrr! Sorry to burst your stupidity bubble but the same study that proves the existence of transgender people pretty much proves that non-binary genders exist as well. Plus all of the changes being made to alleviate dysphoria of these people don't even affect you. You're crybabying over nothing.	/r/AntiFeminists	29/10/17 07:44 AM
1	Feminism, why are people against it? Obviously as an example, retard. Can't you even understand that much? Of course someone as stupid as you would be a feminist. Who else would start squealing like a pig about someone elses' life when it's obvious to even an amoeba that you don't have a goddamn clue what other peoples' experiences are. I've never seen anyone who was such a dumbass to the point that they actually think they're an expert on someone else's life and have a right to talk back like you know better or tell them what happ…	/r/AntiFeminists	29/10/17 07:39 AM
1	Feminism, why are people against it? Its a little hard to make a proper analysis of your failed marriage with such limited knowledge of what went wrong Exactly so shut the fuck up and learn your place.	/r/AntiFeminists	12/10/17 01:03 PM