TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LanceCoolie Archive

View 2 posts and 12 comments by LanceCoolie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
26

LanceCoolie/r/MensRights27/09/11 03:06 PM
21

LanceCoolie/r/MensRights31/01/12 09:18 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

And this is a classic example. Of course you're absolutely right, it should have been a joint decision. But how can an equal discussion be had? If I disagree with her decision I'll not just face abuse for "not supporting her", I face divorce, the loss of my daughter, child support and likely alimony. Seriously? You can't have a mature discussion with your wife about the financial impact on your family of her quitting work and trying to start a business without her threatening to divorce you? I'm…
/r/MensRights15/02/14 03:21 PM
3

I agree. That's not what he said though, and based on subsequent posts, it's not what he meant either.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 03:13 PM
10

For most women, work is basically optional. I sincerely doubt that's true. Yes, it's more socially acceptable for women to be stay at home moms or take non-traditional career paths. But work is far from optional for most women. my wife has decided to start her own business but isn't earning any money or trying to find work, and I'm expected to pay for everything - house, two cars, private school fees, bills and food - as and when she demands it. That sounds like an issue between you and your wif…
/r/MensRights15/02/14 01:53 PM
16

Pretty pleased with Prudence's response.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 09:19 PM
-3

In the context Tyson used it in, it would appear so.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 03:40 PM
2

Yes, I was referencing US law, since that is where this sign was located. I'm aware of EU "hate speech" laws, and I think they're ridiculous.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 05:27 PM
7

Nope, probably not even then. Abstract advocacy of violence is protected speech, and requires intent, imminence, and a likelihood that violence will actually result in order to be criminal. It's doubtful that all three elements would occur from just a sign, but obviously external factors come into play. And it wouldn't proscribe a civil suit if someone was inspired to violence by such a sign. That's sort of how the SPLC bankrupted the White Aryan Resistance.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 05:15 PM
10

Holding a tiny sign during a protest is not incitement in a criminal sense.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 04:55 PM
7

I think it arose from a misunderstanding about her disability. She wrote that she has ataxic cerebral palsy which is not a mental illness.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 01:47 PM
5

I wonder if this woman has noticed that she's a caricature.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 03:39 AM
6

Just off the top of my head, since I read it earlier today
/r/MensRights07/10/11 01:11 AM
7

Speaking of witch hunts, additional viewing
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter