TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LandLockedSailor Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by LandLockedSailor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's forcing someone into a sexual act without their consent. Punching a stranger on the shoulder, even if it's not hard enough to cause damage, is still battery.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 05:33 PM
15

It was blackmail. He was blackmailed into having sex, which is consent via coercion, which is by definition rape.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 04:08 PM
-1

I don't know if that really works, since women have to pay into welfare too, and there are plenty of men on the dole.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:31 PM
6

That's how I think people should argue if they want to be taken seriously and actually gain something from the argument. You are welcome to insult people, but I hope you understand that it detracts rather than adds to the conversation.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 09:16 PM
12

Why is this post being downvoted? It is absolutely correct. When you have an argument to make, focus on the issue. Don't let your tone or language become the issue. MRAs are already accused of being sexist and anti-woman, so anything that can be done to fight that assumption is good for the movement.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 08:37 PM
6

Certain sex acts are already illegal in several states. Not that they're remotely enforceable.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 08:44 PM
2

I completely agree. Our healthcare industry is broken, and not just the insurance side. Like most people who discuss economics or physics, I like to assume perfect conditions. The real world, and the U.S. in particular, is far from perfect.
/r/MensRights22/01/11 10:43 PM
1

No worries :)
/r/MensRights21/01/11 02:01 PM
1

This is a concern with any company in any industry. In general, competition prevents companies from setting an arbitrarily high price. There are exceptions, generally caused by government intervention or other extenuating factors, but prices for any given product should be comparable regardless of the producer.
/r/MensRights20/01/11 10:17 PM
1

Assuming sufficient competition in the market, the effects of any discrimination would be heavily muted. The price you pay should reflect your risk profile and a profit for the company, and as others have noted if you're paying too much you can negotiate for a lowered rate or switch companies.
/r/MensRights20/01/11 09:19 PM
1

I base this statement purely on my opinion. I should've said "I believe everyone deserves quality health care." I don't think that everyone should get a free ride, but I think that in such a wealthy and technologically advanced society as ours, there should be more access to better health care. Whether this is accomplished through government programs or fixing the health care market is a seperate debate, although for the record I tend to lean toward market-based solutions.
/r/MensRights20/01/11 09:15 PM
0

I agree completely. I personally believe that insurance companies should be allowed to price for risk based on ALL statistical data, but I'd much rather have consistency, even if it goes the other way.
/r/MensRights20/01/11 07:21 PM
2

I just wanted to apologize for my "free to not get insurance" point. That was an overgeneralization. I agree that sometimes there isn't as much freedom of choice as there should be, and that's when government needs to step in to make sure people are playing fair. I was taking issue with the specifics of said government intervention.
/r/MensRights20/01/11 07:17 PM
3

I think you misread what I was getting at. First off, no I'm not involved in insurance, but I did study business and econ in college and I do work for a healthcare IT company. A person who's "high risk" is simply anyone that's more at risk than the average to be subject to x health issue. I believe that we should insure everyone, but how we go about doing so is the hard part. The main reason that we have such an unconscionably high amount of uninsured and underinsured people in the U.S. (and why…
/r/MensRights20/01/11 07:09 PM
5

You're right, not every person in a group matches that group's statistical average. Some are higher, some are lower. However, since nobody can see the future, there is no way for an insurance company to assess how much of a risk you are without using statistics. It's not discrimination, it's just the facts. Women are more likely to do x, y, and z, and men are more likely to do a, b, and c. If the facts said otherwise, there wouldn't be a difference in rates. I agree that some insurance companies…
/r/MensRights20/01/11 07:01 PM
0

I feel your pain, but you have to look at it from their point of view. Unless one of their selling points is that they do lower your rates automatically for good driving records, they have no financial incentive to lower it unless you call them out on it. That may seem like total BS, and maybe it is, but it's simply human nature to try to get the best deal possible for yourself. Think about it on a personal level. If you owed some total stranger money, and they forgot, would you make a point of …
/r/MensRights20/01/11 05:56 PM
31

This. Not to get too far off topic, but every time the talking heads in politics or the media start talking about unfair insurance practices, all they do is reveal their own ignorance about what insurance is. Insurance companies (if they're allowed to do their job) price based on risk, and risk is assessed through statistics. Not to say that the insurance industry is free from corruption, but no industry is. In general, all other things being equal, if you're paying more for insurance it's becau…
/r/MensRights20/01/11 04:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter