TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LargeTry88 Archive

View 2 posts and 114 comments by LargeTry88 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

That man thinks women who wear lip stick ask to be harassed and cannot expect men to not hatass them (he didnt say it exactly like this, but we arrnt stupid). His daughter wears a lot of make up btw. I dont like this whole family.
/r/ExRedPill24/01/26 01:32 PM
14

How can a woman seriously date a guy that thinks women became wh*res while looking up to Andrew Tate? These dudes truly think that women dont see through that nonsense.
/r/ExRedPill13/01/26 07:08 AM
2

Do xou know many Red piller that have truly high respect for their wives?
/r/ExRedPill12/01/26 10:41 PM
–

The himself solely judged women for dating more than one person (serial monogamy)...I assume that he himself probably also views female divorcees worsd than male ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 11:14 AM
–

"Bastard children".. Jesus Christ. Its not the children that are a problem, let alone insulting them would be something ok to do. Its the irresponsible parents, the fathers as well. Tho I know many "Bastard children" that have couples marrying later on, its pretty common Here actually. I agree that divorce is bad. Especially the person causing the divorce. shouldnt cheat on their women,women shouldnt cheat either. Both genders f*ck up
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 11:06 AM
–

"Men are not the choosers" There is no "chooser", women are not the gate keepers of relationships..
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 11:03 AM
–

Men cheat more, abuse more drugs. Initiating more divorces doesnt mean causing them. Again, men also engage in serial monogamy. OP seem to be ok with that. He def has SOME wild double Standards, even if other things may be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 11:01 AM
–

I like how he complains about women being able to date more than one guy before marrying but is ok with men doing that. I hate this purple pill group.... oh no a woman dated 3-4 men before settling down. She should marry her first boyfriend at age 21 (most likely to divorce within 10 years btw)....
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 10:59 AM
–

Dude its also allowed for men to enage in "serial monogamy" and "jump from Partner to partner" and not settle down TOO. Actually most men and women do settlw down but after they "jumped" from a couple of partners before. Its not even a bad thing. One night stands are bad IMO . Dating 3-4 people before marriage is not a bad thing. Considering people marrying their first gf/bf at age 21 or so are most likely to divorce within 10 years (statistically, obviously not all). Most things you mention are…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 10:55 AM
–

Both genders are easily blinded and women shouldnt be held to higher Standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 10:54 AM
1

Some men date female arseholes just bc they are hot. Looks can make up for some shitty traits for sure. However most of these relationships end up being unhealthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 10:50 AM
2

This old saggy shitcake called objectively way hotter and younger women "too old" bc they were in their 30s, its hilarious. Why do these men always do that? No mirror at home I guess
/r/ExRedPill05/12/25 02:15 PM
1

Yeah many red pillers are using this to bash all women. F nf are disloyal degenerate losers who cant have healthy relationships themselves, so they should be quiet on that one. However many normal people, Aba and Preach for example, are calling this out in a more nuanced and rational way. I dont think its just the red pill. I think talking about this is valid since it is a crazy case to be honest. Nothing to do with gender tho.
/r/ExRedPill05/12/25 02:03 PM
1

Men can be the prize or the punishment, depending on the man I guess
/r/ExRedPill05/10/25 02:08 PM
1

The reason women are trying to hide their flaws is bc women are Held to higher Standards. Men are forgiven more likely. Red pill also bashes women for things men do too. A mans imagine is also his strenght but his humanity Status isnt based on it
/r/ExRedPill05/10/25 02:07 PM
0

I dont agree that a woman is a slut for being a freak in the bed so long as she only does it within relationships. Madonna whore complex doesnt represent most women, most women arent whores or angels. Otherwise I agree, red pill is full of hypocrisy.
/r/ExRedPill10/05/24 07:55 PM
-1

Being drunk makes some people behave hirribly, but some people just get 2-3 drinks and know their limits. Women and men do cheat equally often. At least where Im from girls just drink and dance, they usually only go there with friends including their boyfriends if they have one. Drinking at the Bar with friends while being dressed normal (maybe sexy but not "over the top"..) is OK. A bar is also kind of like a table where you sit and get some drinks, maybe there will be a dance floor but itd usu…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/24 09:12 PM
5

Men and women are whores, going out to a bar with friends doesnt make you one. Yeah SOME women are, if you obsess over the fact and ask yourself why, you might as well also obsess over the fact men in all jobs, serious Jobs or not, cheat on gheir pregnant partners or behave badly.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/24 08:39 PM
-8

"She isnt allowed go".... YOU arent allowed to go to a Bar scene without her either, right? Since she surely applies this rule to you as well. She "allows you" things and vice versa. My god, I remember why I left this sub. She will cheat on you if she wants go, bar or not. You probably will cheat on her too if you get so drunk and go to Bar, hence you dont go there bc you seemingly dont trust yourself or her in those places. Imagine being so scared you cant even trust your partner going out with…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/24 08:36 PM
-1

Side note..you cannot destroy pussy, chad or not. Some dudes talk about sex as if its rape or maybe they dont know anything about vaginal anatomy. Its basically just some manwhore talk
/r/TheRedPill01/05/24 08:29 PM
7

Also: Women should bot date ugly men just bc they dont assault or cheat on them, thats the bare minimum. A woman has to be physically attracted to a man. Would you say men should date ugly women they dont find hot?ofc not. Many handsome men happen to be decent humans. Many dont. Most assholes I know arent even handsome, they look mid.
/r/ExRedPill29/04/24 10:18 AM
20

The fact he thinks attractive guys just cheat shows je himself would be cheating and mistreating women if he had the options???
/r/ExRedPill29/04/24 10:16 AM
6

"Its just what attractive guys do"...pardon but its just arseholes do, not all attractive guys cheat on several women at the same time or pretend to like a girl just to mistreat her behind her back. I think you hold men to very low Standards and basically say women should never date a good looking man bc they are bad by default.... and ofc you blame the victims. What do you expect them to do? Never date nice looking people? Do you blame men who are cheated on by attractive women too? "Its just w…
/r/ExRedPill29/04/24 10:15 AM
1

Depends... if we say age 45 is where it may get significantly riskier in terms of diseases, but even there most kids still turn out fine, so Id say a child isnt neccessarily a bad idea at old age. Getting autism foe exmaple may be 4x more likely in the 40s but its still overall unlikely. The biggest worry IMO are the energy levels of a man 50+ and the time he has left for his children. Old dads can be great but there are many trade offs. Men should be realistic about that and their dating option…
/r/ExRedPill13/03/24 09:20 PM
1

https://pathfertility.com/age-affects-male-and-female-fertility/ There you can also find the links to the studies
/r/ExRedPill13/03/24 07:37 AM
1

In everything in terms of his body, its well known men peak in their 20s physically, humans in general. Can you use Google? Every source mentions this. We talk about sperm quality which is optimal in his 20s. Not about his skills. Being with a man that grows his skills is amazing, no one is saying daging a man between 28-32 is bad, it has benefits as well. They solely mentioned sperm quality of a sperm donor. Id agree that 30 is a good age for a man, 20 is too young and 40 too old. So 30 can be …
/r/ExRedPill13/03/24 07:29 AM
3

Most men dont experience the phenomenon where their sexual options "greatly" multiple once they hit 40, thats the red pill delusion. Most men arent in their prime at that age usually. Sperm quality aside.
/r/ExRedPill12/03/24 01:11 PM
3

Lifestyle defintely helps but males fertility decreases significantly after 40 regardless, thats the science. Lifestyle cannot remove the impacts of a natural aging process, it can maybe minimize them a little but your genes play a bigger role than Lifestyle. Men do have a natural clock too, Lifestyle doesnt change that. Age is a much bigger facfor than Lifestyle sadly. If you are 28 and drink and smoke, ofc your sperm is going to be shitty. But probably still better than the sperm of a healthy …
/r/ExRedPill12/03/24 01:03 PM
1

No, age has a significant impact on mens fertility regardless of Lifestyle, you cant beat the natural aging procress. Thats what the facts say. However a good Lifestyle obviously will help and minimize these impacts, not remove them however.
/r/ExRedPill12/03/24 12:59 PM
1

Its nothing New that sperm quality is shit after 40. But humor stays forever ;)
/r/ExRedPill12/03/24 12:55 PM
2

That makes no sense. They achieve their success at age 30 bc they had to work for it and it doesnt just happen. But PHYSICALLY a male does peak around 25, his sperm is best at that age. Maybe not his skills, thats not relevant tho lol.
/r/ExRedPill12/03/24 12:54 PM
4

I think most men peak at age 28-32 physically, women at age 24-26. There has to some nuance. Red pillers pretend women become ugly and infertile by age 3p, which isnt true. However saying that 40 year old women should date 20 year old men is just weird. Maybe a 40 year old woma should date a 30 year old man, ok, but not some 20 year old dude that still has to figure out life.
/r/ExRedPill12/03/24 12:51 PM
4

Most women prefer men their age but there are some women who dont. Tho these men tend to be one of those that DID age gracefully, so you wouldnt really notice the age gap of these couples and money doesnt always play a role. Yes a man can still have options in his late 30s, same way a woman still has options in her early 30s. There are some years men have that women dont, but men will eventually "age out" too and most do at age 40-42.
/r/ExRedPill12/03/24 12:47 PM
5

Back then red pillers said a womans wall is around 35, maybe 30. Now its 25. Its damn, why would a 27 year old woman be less desirable than a 34 year old male REALISTICALLY? It makes no sense in 95% of cases..."but muhhh If I get rich"....yeah winning the lottery surely helps lol.
/r/ExRedPill12/03/24 09:28 AM
7

Most men dont age like wine. I can say some men have a slight peak at age 30-35 but from there it goes down hill quickly. Maybe 10% of men look very good after 40. Its rare, and its ok to age.
/r/ExRedPill12/03/24 09:26 AM
1

Not sure tbh. Its my bf in these fantasies and him desiring me to the point he loses control is kinda hot. Its probably not a rational or good fantasy but I have them sometimes. But I could never have these with men I didnt desire
/r/ExRedPill04/03/24 04:42 PM
1

I do have rape fantasies. But its also not "real rape". Its more likey I know Im horny as fuck and truly wan that dude to "force" me and give me pleasure, in a more gentle way (not besting the shit out of me). But yeah its a fantasy and not reality. Very different from actual rape. More like "rape play" aka its still consensual.
/r/ExRedPill04/03/24 04:26 PM
1

Yeah they just hate women, nothing New.
/r/ExRedPill04/03/24 04:15 PM
1

Men are also less satisfied sexually in marriage and less satisfied in marriage if they had a lot of partners. But I guess it depends on the Level or promiscuity. OP mentioned 3-9 partners which I think are ok. But the 11% of women, or lets sa 5% of women that had more than 20 partners are ususlly also less educated and less stable.
/r/ExRedPill04/03/24 04:13 PM
1

Most civilized societies are not patriarchal these days but more egalitarian. A culture where monogamy is the norm vs a man having multiple women is more stable over all. Surely some patriarchal structures and norms existed for a reason, not everything was due sexism", but it was also easy to "add" lot of sexism on top of that... like violence and else.
/r/ExRedPill04/03/24 04:09 PM
2

Good points. Its fair to care about a body count but its not fair to ignore education. Both things can be important to some extend. Tho only when talking about women with VERY high body counts. Ofc these red pill nut Jobs even argue that educated women are more likely to divorce. What I find quiet shocking is that they seem sooo easily, willingly ignore that men with a higher body count are more likely to be less satisfied in a marriage TOO. They will show you a graph that shows both genders to …
/r/ExRedPill04/03/24 03:58 PM
25

No we shouldnt.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 02:53 PM
1

You said attractive men, which partly implies good looks. Looks are especially important for casual sex. Good looking men do have more options as well. MOST men, attractive and non attractive do NOT sleep around. Its also explained why in the study I mentioned. Sociosexuality is different among men too. Hence, its no unreasonable to expect an attractive man to not have been with 15+ women. Not at all. Like you said, looks arent everything. Diszipline and self control are attractive as well. A ma…
/r/RedPillWomen11/01/24 01:45 PM
4

Ehm..actually no, most atttactive men dont sleep around like wild, most people in general dont do that. Saying that wanting a man you are attracted to who didnt sleep with 15+ women is a "fantasy" is a huge stretch. The median for sexual partners for men at age 30 is 5. A man not being promiscous is the bare minimum, and its a reasonable expectation. Doesnt mean you have to only date ugly, fat men. Here the assumtion that most attractive men sleep around is debunked: https://datepsychology.com/m…
/r/RedPillWomen08/01/24 09:16 AM
4

I dont care if they grow, I still prefer men that didnt had a "ho phase". I also know women that were promiscous in their laze teens/early 20s and ended up married and most of them dont end up having STDs and many kids out of wedlock. Its fine, Im not hating on anyone.. ofc there is a difference between having lets say 12 partners and 50 or more, there are levels of promiscous behavior I guess and some peoppe are just promiscous for a very short tome and learn quickly. But I just prefer men that…
/r/RedPillWomen08/01/24 08:12 AM
8

Men have two different strategies/agendas. Men want commitment too but are also able to separate sex and commitment (some women are able to do so but less). Look into Alexanderdstepsych, he has done quiet good research on sociosexuality and how it Varies a lot from men to men, not all men want to have many random partners (but more men compared to women) and more attractive men dont have much more partners on average. That doesnt mean they dont want any experience. We talk about heavily sleeping…
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/24 11:11 PM
15

My fiance was a Virgin when we met (we met when I was 22 and he 26), I had 2 partners before him. I Was attracted to him and I even liked that he was a virgin and wished I had stayed one too bc it would have been more special. He isnt into hook ups and just never had the need to do so to be validated. He pursued me and it worked out fine bc of his humor and his demeanor. He spent his late teens and early 20s with studying and building himself up. I dont think a man is weird for being a virgin, I…
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/24 10:42 PM
9

Lol what. Men have two "Agendas", one is being promiscous and the other is being a stable psrtner and raising healthy children, both things are equally valuable biologically but one is significantly more damaging to family and society as a whole. No man is proud of creating many kids out of wedlock that likely will die or perform poorly, even tho he spread his seed. This tactic may make sense as a sexual Strategy, but it has many down sides, especially to their female partners. The idea that men…
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/24 10:10 PM
1

Both genders suck tbh.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 06:53 PM
1

Same way abusive women are often desrcibed as overly masculine...loud, aggressive and all. We have a term called "mansweiber" in germany, implying violent women are "like men".
/r/MensRights07/01/24 06:49 PM
1

To be fair other platttforms lick mens arses, depends on the community more than the plattform. Reddit is also full of incels and else, its a very mixed group and both extremes are present. Women defending men are called pick mes and men not being Bat shit incels are "simps"....childish. women are Held accountable on reddit most of the time, not less than men.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 06:39 PM
1

Traveling without him is ok...traveling ALONE (no friends)...on valentinsday is weird....regardless of gender. Id understand it if she offered him to come with her and he refused bc he doesnt like that place or has no time and now she Plans a Trip with a friend bc she wants to Visit that place.
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/24 06:18 PM
1

Lmao its always about cheating. And no, these places arent Las Vegas. It seems weird to travel alone tho. Maybe she could take some friends or ideally ask him if he wants to join. If he cant, thats ok, but the offer was there.
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/24 06:14 PM
2

Maybe he just wonders why she doesnt take 1-2 friends or just asks him to join? Its def a bit weird. Going out alone is ok but traveling for 4 days alone... I dont think he has an issue with her looking nice but its the sudden Shift and only doing that when he isnt around but not on dates with him is also weird
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/24 06:12 PM
1

Some HVM would be ok with more than 5, but rarely more than 10. Especially older HVM tend to be ok with a lil more. But to play safe 5 or less is a good advice. Regardless of gender, having 3 LTR just look better than whats "normal" these days.
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/24 06:09 PM
1

Id say 5 at that age would be absolutely fine too. 10 more would be too much.
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/24 06:06 PM
0

This video doesnt state what being a "girl boss" actually is nor does it state that working women are miserable (Black and white thinking isnt supported by these studies). Merely that they tend to be less happy in some cases, not generally unhappy. A woman working a job and having kids isng exactly a "girl boss". Maybe a woman working 70 hours while childless AND SINGLE (not all childless people are single).
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/24 05:45 PM
1

Not one study stated that empowerment are "miserable", its way more nuanced as the video itself admits. Women being "somewhat happier"when xy doesnt equal "others miserable" and some studies even stated that career women are happier in some european areas. But its pretty complex. What can be said is that women working full time AND having kids tend to be less happy, whereas women who work part time and have kids non surprisingly are less stressed and thus tend to be happier. But Not "all women",…
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/24 05:42 PM
1

These type of men arent very marriageable either, if they sleep with anyone and lack control. But a man with a low count usually cares about n count.
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/24 05:09 PM
1

He deserves someone that accepts him and his sillyness and cuteness. I hope he finds a good woman.
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/24 05:07 PM
1

He isnt based, he is a mron. Its fine to not want to date someone like that (male or female) but saying women deserve to be treated poorly, lack of basic human respect is incelsht. Especially if he doesnt think men deserve this treattement. Women shouldnt hold themselves to a higher Standard while men dont. Both should if he considers promiscuity a bad thing. If you dont want to date a woman that had 20 people, thats valid. Saying she deserves bad treatment (like sexual harassment or lying), tha…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/24 04:00 PM
1

Im just Pro Fairness. Also why would you ask a womam about what kind of sex she had with her two ex boyfriends and then be triggered and grossed out bc she had oral sex. Wtf. Id get that her f*cking 7 dudes in such a short time is weird tho. Tho I assume the Story is fake anyway, but interesting that you made that "she ate ass" part in your head, probably a Hidden fetish.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 03:08 PM
1

Most women will still have less than 10 partners, the ones with more can be sort out. Thing is Most men who are degenerate are honest so women have it easier to sort then out unlike men
/r/MensRights07/01/24 03:03 PM
1

Sorry for my rants. Women that exercise this preference are less likely to be promiscous themselves where as many promiscous men still believe they deserve a non promiscous woman, id argue that these men are bashed. However in real life its true that women indeed do prefer less promiscous men.Obviously most men are loyal and non promiscous and these men 100% have the right to look after themselves and prefer women with single digit body counts. You can make a hoe into a housewife, but the likely…
/r/MensRights07/01/24 03:00 PM
1

Bc of the double Standards and focusing on whamen only despite studies showing very promiscous men are also less stable
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:48 PM
1

Would you say the same to a woman that dates a man who had 100 women before and expect him to be loyal? How likely is he compared to men who had 5 women? 50 men are a lot and very uncommon. These women probably cheat a lot. More realistic would be her having 5-10 partners which is more stable and fine to accept. So most men probably dont care SO LONG as the number isnt very high, or generally less than 9.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:47 PM
1

Yeah same way most men report sexual Motives to cheat, meaning happy mansl*uts also cheat. Its pretty clear that you keep ignoring that tho. Somehow you dont call men names, its VERY obvious that you have a bias against women here. We need to remember that sexual number is just one factor. So indeed a happy former male and female sl*t can be loyal, obviously. Its just on average they are less likely to.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:43 PM
1

Same way red pill would ban you if you posted links that Show men with many partners are ALSO more likely to cheat. Plus many of these studies focused only on women in the first place, doesnt make them bad tho. Studies that focused on both also showed that there is a correlation for both. Most of these sources basically Show that women (and men) with partners in the double digits are significantly more likely to stray, having 4 vs. 5 partners for example makes little to no difference but having …
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:38 PM
1

Im a woman and I also wouldnt date a man that had 15+ partners before me bc men are also more likely to cheat if they had many partners....and if they had MANY MaNY partners its probably wildly more likely, so these PUAS are red flags. Men can date whomever they want TOO. A good portion of promiscous women will be loyal but just less COMPARED to non promiscous women.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:19 PM
1

Nothing wrong with it but he ignores all the citations, studies that Show the same to be true for men? Why? This isnt about mens rights at this point. He seems to get defensive when people bring up that manwh*res are also less loyal "The high correlations for males (r = .85) and females (r = .79) between reported numbers of sex partners and EPC partners may bear on questions of both paternity and abandonment in the face of infidelity… But the question remains: does promiscuity predict infidelity…
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:13 PM
1

Ok but then why do you only focus on women? Seems like happy mansl*uts also cheat more often.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:11 PM
1

Biology?! Bc men cheating should be acceptable? With whom will men sleep? Men? "The high correlations for males (r = .85) and females (r = .79) between reported numbers of sex partners and EPC partners may bear on questions of both paternity and abandonment in the face of infidelity… But the question remains: does promiscuity predict infidelity? Our data are consistent with those of Essock-Vitale and McGuire (1985) in suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variance in infidelity can be …
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:10 PM
1

"The high correlations for males (r = .85) and females (r = .79) between reported numbers of sex partners and EPC partners may bear on questions of both paternity and abandonment in the face of infidelity… But the question remains: does promiscuity predict infidelity? Our data are consistent with those of Essock-Vitale and McGuire (1985) in suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variance in infidelity can be accounted for in terms of number of sex partners… promiscuity is in fact a good…
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:08 PM
1

I mean if you are a guy and you like to "eat ass", should the woman also avoid you bc of "where your mouth" has been? You have to stay a Virgin if so. Her having sex with her two ex boyfriends isnt being promiscous, her giving that Detail is gross tho. Both genders cheat (men even more often) and men with high body counts are also more likely to cheat. "The high correlations for males (r = .85) and females (r = .79) between reported numbers of sex partners and EPC partners may bear on questions …
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:02 PM
1

Both genders are more likely to cheat if they have a high body count, so maybe also focus on not having too many partners yourself The high correlations for males (r = .85) and females (r = .79) between reported numbers of sex partners and EPC partners may bear on questions of both paternity and abandonment in the face of infidelity… But the question remains: does promiscuity predict infidelity? Our data are consistent with those of Essock-Vitale and McGuire (1985) in suggesting that a substanti…
/r/MensRights07/01/24 01:58 PM
1

Doesnt this applies to men and women? "The high correlations for males (r = .85) and females (r = .79) between reported numbers of sex partners and EPC partners may bear on questions of both paternity and abandonment in the face of infidelity… But the question remains: does promiscuity predict infidelity? Our data are consistent with those of Essock-Vitale and McGuire (1985) in suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variance in infidelity can be accounted for in terms of number of sex p…
/r/MensRights07/01/24 01:57 PM
2

Being a proud homewrecker that lacks morals but acts surprised he only atttacts the same kind of women
/r/TheRedPill07/01/24 12:42 PM
1

Yeah but most women still dont go out to hook up, and most young men I know only go out with their friends groups that are female and male. Im bot from Miami, but here people just out out with their friends and not to meet new people for sex, some probably do but not all. They go to clubs every couple of months, not weekly. There is a portion of promiscuous people ofc. Most people tend to go out to have time with friends, dance, not hook ups, I assume there are many men that go out for that reas…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/24 12:39 PM
1

My only problem with this text: Women with very high sex drives are not a problem, its good if both if your sex drives Match in a relationship
/r/TheRedPill07/01/24 12:19 PM
1

There are taken women/men in relationships who go out and go to bars, trying to hook up. Why do you go there? Just to dance, surely some women and men just go there to dance and all but many are seeking for a hook up. I prefer Bars bc there people just sit on a table with their friends group and drink and behave less insane.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/24 12:14 PM
1

Yeah but at the same time you were only her turn as well
/r/TheRedPill07/01/24 12:09 PM
1

Men who have a lot of partners are also more likely to cheat and risk the stability of the relationship and even health of the woman. Unlike popular belief of some Red pillers women do prefer more stable men that dont constantly seek hook ups. And.. By Definition any woman that is not a virgin isnt "chaste" anymore, if she had one bf befofe she is obviously not chaste anymore. The reason why men only married virgins was bc women got pregnant, tho you could never tell if a woman was a Virgin anyw…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/24 12:07 PM
1

Some parents excuse bad male behavior with "boys will be boys" and this needs to be called out and its called out usually. But ignoring the other side seems to be normal. When I was 14-16 Ive witnessed girls touching boys without consent and the boys were visibly uncomfortable but didnt know how to articulate that. Boys are very overly sexualized, objectified in a way bc society teaches them that every sexual attention is good and sleeping with 200 women is a good thing (consensual or not). Obvi…
/r/MensRights05/01/24 05:02 PM
-1

Dont think this is true. Both genders dictate what masculinity is and its mostly men calling other men gay or what not but generally both genders dictate whats "acceptable". I hope you get out if this constantly angry circle of blaming only women, thinking that only women act a certain way and focusing on negative habits of only women tho. I agree that its (toxic) moms ususlly shaming and punishing both genders bc they spend more time raising them whereas the father just watch is happening
/r/MensRights05/01/24 04:49 PM
5

Im a daughter and I also listen to her ramblings too often. Its not just sons, its every child I guess. However my dad isnt also pretty awful at times when he makes fun of her and calls her stupid in front of everyone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/24 04:41 PM
6

There isnt anything wrong with listening to your girls Problems. Obviously if it gets to a point where she doesnt try to solve ANY of it, it becomes exhausting and needs to be addressed. Mature women will listen to this asvice and will also accept that sometimes they can be part of the Problem. Communicating these things respectfully between adults should be normal. Immature women will ofc not be able to do so, so wont immature men. Its not an "all women" or "all men" thing, both genders perform…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/24 04:40 PM
1

Wikipedia isnt that feminist and seems more neutral than most news Outlets or plattforms, not saying a lot but yeah.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/24 04:21 PM
-1

Everyone is valued for what they can provide and no one is loved unconditionally.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/24 04:15 PM
1

Why wouldnt they test then on non-pregnant women? I mean the women should make regular pregnancy Tests and Fill a paper that they arent planning to get pregnant and are aware of these risks. But I dont know how these things work legal wise If the main reason is that they dont want to kill off a fetus and be sued, I guess its not "sexism" to not include women. Most drugs work fine on both sexes, cancer treatments as well. Not sure if including women is needed, if not, then its defintely not reaso…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/24 04:13 PM
1

Most women marry in their early 30s and have kids in their 30s in my country, so its not true. And most single women didnt have meaningless sex with 10+ men anyway, usually just relationships. These men are mostly old and dried up themselves but its OK when they are I guess
/r/ExRedPill05/01/24 07:01 AM
1

Its cringe for normal people but super based and funny for online weirdos. Its like telling a man "bad sperm donor". A dude once called me names and said "empty egg carton" to me when I argued with him, I was 19 lmao. So creepy
/r/ExRedPill05/01/24 06:59 AM
1

Bc most sources say that its fine until 35 and most women are fertile enough to have kids without issues until 35 and even later most women manage to do that.
/r/ExRedPill05/01/24 06:57 AM
1

I remember when red pill said women over 35 are too old , then it was 30, now its 25. Somehow they assume that they themselves are more desirable at age 40 than they were at age 28....
/r/ExRedPill05/01/24 06:56 AM
1

But if you research every source says that up until 35 female fertility is fine or "fine enpugh". After 35 it does get more difficult tho and after 40 its very difficult. That being said, this "no eggs" is cringe. Its like saying "bad sperm!" to me older than 35 (I know they dont like hesring thst sperm quslity decreases a lot lol). Its not even funny just weird....
/r/ExRedPill05/01/24 06:53 AM
1

There us no study that proves this (the "oxytocin" garbage is also debunked), I mean they never have actually cited the study or looked into it. The study there is that they sometimes mention shows women with two partners are way more likely to split within 5 years than women with 3-9 partners, women with 10+ partners were LESS likely to Split in the 80s. So that study does not really show what they claim. There are surveys on that men with a lot of partners are more likely to cheat, wonder why …
/r/ExRedPill05/01/24 06:45 AM
1

Your IQ is way too high for reddit, delete the App.
/r/ExRedPill05/01/24 06:39 AM
2

I mostly wear brownish lip Stick, I guess I mimic fecies
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 05:09 PM
1

Pretty and extroverted women arent much more promiscous, at least many of them arent. Most of them tend to be in relationships. Its a him problem. He is a promiscous dude and wonders why only promiscous women are into him. He is at the Club and f*cks around, so why is He surprised.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 05:05 PM
1

"Orgasm lips". You dont know how they look bc you never been in the same room with a woman that just had an orgasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 03:50 PM
2

He isnt that bad and he actually has some positive Videos about women as well as some toxic ones where he compares womens sexuality as "defining their worth" to a man or some shit like comparing them with objects on discount. But in one of his Videos he said that men shoulnt obsess over the fact their wives may had a few hook ups bc women are humans and not angels. Im unsure about him. His followers seem to be rp mostly tho.
/r/ExRedPill24/11/23 05:44 PM
1

If a man is a Player I assume he is unstable. This "assuming he has what women want" is crap bc you need to judge the man for what He is, not based on assumptions. The women that want such a male are also troubled and have failed relationships bc they chase degenerate "chads". And most very promiscous men are not good partners. Most not all. My husband Was a Virgin and he is def of higher mating value" than most of these degenerate males who has 20 relationships and couldnt keep one.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 10:52 AM
1

Women also look for looks in a man actually, not just resources.... but both seems to be important Red pill def has some true but getting sucked into it Its jsrd to realize whats true and what not. Id believe anything Ive seen online and it was hurrful bc it messed with my self esteem as a woman
/r/ExRedPill22/11/23 10:26 PM
1

He is a single father himself....
/r/ExRedPill31/10/23 07:48 PM
1

Notice how I hot downvotes but Im just right lmao. If incel is hate speech, so is simp, cuck. Btw I never would call a man any of these words in real life bc they all sound ridiculous and its just shaming language
/r/MensRights21/10/23 05:24 AM
1

Using the word Simp is hate speech
/r/MensRights21/10/23 05:23 AM
-10

Men call women "crazy feminists" and so on all the time tho. Btw you dont have to be a feminist just bc you call actually sexist men "incels". Well this Word kinda has lost its meaning. Its meant to desrcibe virgin males (not by choice) and is now solely used for sexist men. Edit: If calling men incel is hate speech then calling men simps should also be considered hate speech...or at least just Not normalized.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 06:55 PM
2

There are things are are pretty obviously harassment. Like yelling "nice ass" and grabbing someones hand while he/she walks by just to talk to them. I think its also true that some things can be put in the grey area.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 06:52 PM
1

Im right tho. The fact so many mras Supported Paul Elam makes me sick as a MRA
/r/MensRights09/10/23 11:25 PM
-10

They are also more likely to raise them/ spend more time with them. Men are slightly more likely to kill their own children, and if its not their own they make up 80% of child murderer However mothers are lore likely to inflict socially "acceptable" harm like beatings bc society views it as "what a mom has to do"... in my home country at least
/r/MensRights09/10/23 11:22 PM
1

If women are begging to be raped bc they flirted with a guy then men are begging to be murdered by their girlfriends if they cheated on them. You dont expect both to happen tho.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 11:14 PM
1

No one can beg to be raped same way as no one can beg to be murdered by walking down the streets at night or marrying a bad woman that posions you bc you cheated on her. People cannot beg for something like this to happen to them. And if so, the same would apply to male rape and murder victims, or men who are falsely accused. If a woman begs to be raped just for wearing a miniskirt of fllirting with a man, that doesnt mean men look that great. His comparison with "saying mean stuff so you are pu…
/r/MensRights09/10/23 11:08 PM
1

Women arent "asking to be raped" by being mean or narcisstic or even just flirting with men. This applies to male rape victkms as well. Nice try to compare rape with two people arguing and starting a fight tho. This is simple rape apologia and nothing else...as if wearing a Mini skirt means you habe to expect rape whereever you go. Or arguing with your boyfriend/ girlfriend. Its like saying "men are BEGgING to be murdered if they get intimimate with women/ say something mean to women". Jesus Chr…
/r/MensRights09/10/23 11:01 PM
1

Paul is a rape apologist. I wouldnt support a woman saying the nasty stuff about male rape victims either. Paul Elam isnt about mens rights.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 10:56 PM
1

Thats not satire, ypu dinr understand what satire is. Yelling "men are beging to be raped cuz they are narcisstic and stupid" wouldnt be satire either.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 10:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter