TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lasttoflinch Archive

View 5 posts and 638 comments by Lasttoflinch on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Just give X number of paid sick leave per employee regardless of age and gender. Having an additional set of mandatory paid leave for women will certainly make compaines view women as riskier hires. Having equal amount of paid leave for everyone is much fairer as this doesn't disregard menses implications but extend the same regard to other conditions. Menses can be debilitating for some women but there are many other chronic conditions that warrant the same regard. For example, some people suff…
/r/MensRights01/06/26 12:37 PM
19

AWARE's recent FB post blamed boy-only caning on the 'patriarchy' but I failed to understand their mental contortion. Women are vastly overrepresented in the education sphere for decades. In primary schools, approximately 80% of teachers and 75% of principals are women and nothing have been done about gendered school caning. I find one of the old AWARE post especially distasteful (see cited comment below) as they seem unwilling to recognise male-only caning as a form of gender discrimination. Th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 07:19 AM
13

I reported the post for CSE violation. X replied that no violation has taken place.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 03:22 AM
7

Maybe we'll see a new White Feather Movement.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 05:37 AM
26

A national study in Singapore found that women were more approving than men about the benefits of (male-only) conscription, but less than 10% were willing to serve themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/25 05:34 PM
10

The same applies for government homes.
/r/MensRights05/11/25 05:59 PM
36

Woman got raped, boyfriend most affected.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 12:50 PM
28

Since the UK has closed all female juvenile prisons, are these scumbags serving their sentence in an adult prison or one of those luxurious girls' homes?
/r/MensRights12/10/25 05:47 PM
16

It wouldn't be sexual assault if he had explicitly stated (whether verbally or in writing) what the performance entails, but that doesn't seem to be the case. The bigger problem for me is the apparent double standards. It's pretty common for female strippers to stroke the faces and chests, as well as sit in the laps of male customers without explicit consent.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 12:47 AM
-2

And if a woman rapes a men then the men have the right to force the criminal woman to abort And if he wishes to be a committed father, maybe he should have the right to legally compel the offending mother to give birth to his child. I'm not against either circumstance in principle. However, when it comes to pregnancy, time is of the essence and First Information Report (FIR) to conviction may take years. Such a practice is not exactly feasible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/25 08:40 PM
4

Women can stand and pee too.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 05:11 AM
4

Many of the comments over there are vile, as usual.
/r/MensRights30/08/25 12:14 PM
2

S437 of the CrPC “Provided that the Court may direct that a person be released on bail if such person is under the age of sixteen years or is a woman or is sick or infirm, even if there appear reasonable grounds for believing that he has been guilty of a non-bailable offence...”
/r/MensRights24/07/25 07:19 AM
13

Don't forget the Constitution. Article 14 states that all persons are entitled to equal protection of the laws but Art 15(3) states that special provisions (i.e. positive discrimination) can be made for women and children. In other words, Article 14 is useless and men are not entitled to equal protection under the Constitution.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 01:57 PM
2

This is most likely rooted in historical context, where penile penetration was long considered a necessary element in defining rape. Additionally, society tends to view penile penetration as more severe and deserving of more opprobrium compared to penetration involving other body parts or objects. As far as I know, before the introduction of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, stakeholders were consulted and there was significant agreement that the legal definition rape should remain an offence of pen…
/r/MensRights30/05/25 08:47 AM
1

Singapore
/r/MensRights29/05/25 03:16 PM
3

For my country, National Service should be gender-neutral. Either all serve or none serves. Caning (whipping with a ratan cane) is only for males under 50 in judicial, school, reformation and military settings. Either abolish caning or amend the law so no one is legislatively exempted. Able-bodied, gainfully employed wives are eligible for spousal maintenance (alimony) but only incapacitated husbands who cannot maintain themselves are eligible for it. The law should be amended so husbands have t…
/r/MensRights29/05/25 10:33 AM
2

Certain laws have gendered implementation (e.g. chemical and surgical castration for sexual offenders) even though they are gender-neutral in writing.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 10:26 AM
9

It is known as assault by penetration in the UK. The maximum sentence for this and rape is the same. However, the starting point for rape is 4 years imprisonment, whilst it's a community order (non-custodial) for assault by penetration.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 10:23 AM
1

i am not really sure they would castrate all those female teachers who "have sex with" their male students You can be sure about that. I have never come across a case where chemical castration was imposed on a female sex offender, even in jurisdictions where the laws on chemical castration are gender-neutral. On a side note, in Kaduna where surgical castration is practised, male offenders are subjected to bilateral orchidectomy (removal of both testicles), while female offenders are only liable …
/r/MensRights23/05/25 07:35 PM
82

Again, why only for women?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/25 04:20 AM
1

if women are rear ending kids and working. The husband needs to step it up. I'm not against this whatsoever. I'm saying that men in similar circumstances (e.g. househusbands, primary caregivers) should have equal rights to alimony. Also, how do you let someone half as strong as you that can get pregnant outearn yoi. Physical strength is not a significant factor in most occupations. There are plenty of women who outearn their partners.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 02:55 AM
2

I'm pretty sure the AI botched the translation. The prosecution, which did not acknowledge her claim, put A on trial, saying it was certain that A was sexually assaulted. How can the prosecution put A on trial if they were certain that A was SAed? It dosent make any sense.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 02:50 AM
5

The first trial court sentenced him to 17 years and six months in prison and permanently banned him from serving in the educational profession. The him means her. Apparently, the AI translator couldn't tell 他 (him) and 她 (her) apart.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 12:21 AM
1

The vast majority of people who operate heavy vehicles are men, so it's one of many factors that skew the figure upwards significantly.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 12:12 AM
1

In Canada, they give you tax credits if you have kids. In Singapore, only mothers are entitled to most of these tax credits. Doesn't matter if you're a male primary or sole caregiver.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 12:55 PM
3

She was booked into Louisville Metro Corrections on second-degree assault in connection to a shooting charge Ought to be 2 charges of attempted murder.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 01:23 AM
1

I don't object to alimony (with some tweakings), so as long they are gender-neutral and husbands have equal rights to it. It doesn't make sense that gainfully employed wives are eligible to file for maintenance but househusbands aren't. A common and deeply flawed argument is that wives need greater protection as they are generally the financially dependent party. However, a gender-neutral maintenance policy doesn't mean a male billionaire is somehow entitled to alimony from his jobless wife. Eve…
/r/MensRights15/05/25 07:46 PM
9

Solicitor Harriet Wistrich: "It doesn't surprise me at all. It seems to me to be reflective of a higher value placed on men over women in our culture basically, and so it's more appalling to be a male victim than a female victim. So men (and only men) who raped other men were given harsher sentences for a few years and that's indicative of society placing a higher value on men? Why start the comparison from 2018 and not 2003 when they expanded the legal definition of rape to include male - male …
/r/MensRights13/05/25 12:50 AM
10

She gets a pre-sentence report by default as she's female. Another day in two-tier justice UK.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 07:03 PM
28

When they say partners, what they really meant is women.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 11:58 AM
18

If I recall correctly, she said female on male rape should be considered "unwanted touching."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/25 12:16 AM
3

Unsolicited contact with the opposite sex.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 12:49 AM
4

If I remember correctly, in certain years (e.g. 2011 and 2012), more men reported being MTP than women reported being raped.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/25 03:59 AM
20

Plenty of studies have found that female perpetrated sexual violence is extremely under-reported.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 12:24 AM
7

There are also videos of nude male offenders being subjected to judicial caning.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 06:13 AM
2

It's mostly yes for most jurisdictions. Moreover, in some areas, only males can be charged and convicted for certain SA offences.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 12:03 PM
53

Women do not start wars. The contrary was found based on empirical evidence.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 03:15 PM
57

Many feminists say being a feminist is the same as believing men and women should have equal rights. However, ask them if they're a musculinist and they'll say no, despite it having the same generic definition.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/25 04:59 AM
2

When My Singaporean friend attempted suicide, two women cavity searched him. He wasn't even accused of violence towards anyone else. This is atrocious. Was he forcibly searched? Did he indicate that he preferred to be searched by a male? As far as I know, consent is required for intimate searches unless it's for suspicion for terrorism. A male officer may also be assigned to search him on a discretionary basis. We all know there would be massive campaigns against Singapore if it was male staff w…
/r/MensRights10/03/25 03:23 AM
4

There is no justification on why part XI of the WC should only recognise women and girls as possible victims. Similarly, there is no reasonable explanation to impose additional prerequisites for husbands (must be incapacitated before or during marriage and unable to maintain themselves) regarding spousal maintenance.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 04:13 AM
1

In almost all rapes, against both men and women, the perpetrator is a man. It depends on which definition one uses. Your statement would be right under the CDC's definition, which limits the purview to A sexually penetrating B without B's consent. However, the figures look very different if made to penetrate scenarios are counted as rape. In fact, the NISVS has consistently found similar prevalence for women who were raped and men who were made to penetrate another person without consent in the …
/r/MensRights08/03/25 04:08 AM
12

Malaysia and Singapore share similar gendered laws. Some of them include men are not legally recognised as possible victims of rape (and women not being legally recognised as possible perpetrators), Men are only eligible to file for spousal maintenance if they were incapacitated before or during the marriage and are unable to maintain themselves. However, the same prerequisites do not apply to women, and able-bodied, gainfully employed women are still eligible to file for spousal maintenance. On…
/r/MensRights07/03/25 10:20 AM
14

They also include a long list of other ‘minority’ criminals to be covered by the measures, including transgender people, young adults and addicts. It should also apply to all women offenders, they add. It is very much in the article.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 05:46 PM
3

Not sustainable when you only have 12 inmates per year. I believe the figure should be higher, just that female youth offenders are more likely than male ones to receive non-custodial sentences for the same offence severity (the government is extending the same leniency to minorities now). I am just saying that this decision is really not taking away men's rights and not as discriminative as people thought. Rights are relative. They are not necessarily taking away existing rights for male youths…
/r/MensRights06/03/25 01:37 AM
11

It also makes sense that you don't want to throw female inmates into the a space filled with 98% male inmates. They can build separate female youth prisons, or they can close down all youth prisons and build enough secure youth homes for all youth offenders. People should be treated as individuals. It is disgusting to treat individuals of certain groups more or less harshly by default just because members of such groups are more or less likely to offend.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:06 AM
2

This is like vasectomy for men, which is nowhere as severe as castration. The equivalent should be oophorectomy (removal of the ovaries).
/r/MensRights04/03/25 12:13 AM
12

Yet to see a man accused of SA using this as a defence.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 12:41 PM
14

schools as well as judicially. Caning for males is practised in government homes (e.g. juvenile reformative centre) and the military too. The government abolished corporal punishment for girls in government homes in 2020 but retained it for boys. While the law doesn't explicitly exempt females from military caning, only conscripts are subjected to it to the best of my knowledge, and conscription is only applicable for males.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 11:44 AM
4

He then proceeded to the fact that two sexes are different for a purpose Let's hope they don't come up with some "gender-sensitive" policies that give men and boys the short end of the stick.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 12:57 PM
58

The sentence should be postponed to after she gave birth.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 02:33 PM
1

And "you people are next." Why wouldn't the authorities interpret that as a legitimate threat with the Brian Thompson's slaying still so fresh?
/r/MensRights17/12/24 11:39 PM
23

Some pedos don't act upon their urges. Can't be predatory if there's no prey.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/24 03:01 PM
-2

I have no criminal record and don't own any guns, yet if I walked into my bank and screamed at the teller to hand over all the money, my face would probably be on the floor in seconds.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 05:10 AM
2

As far as I'm aware, there's no law that criminalise harassment against men in India. Aside from the aforementioned law, section 498A of the IPC (Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty) is also gendered and men are not recognised as victims under said provision as well.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 03:48 PM
29

Under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, only women can be applicants and only men can be respondents. In other words, the law does not recognise male victims and female offenders.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 02:21 PM
1

It is gender-neutral in writing, but its implementation seems otherwise. If the provisions are enforced as written, common sense would have prevailed and the female party would be the perpetrator in cases like this (use Google translate) and this.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 07:41 AM
14

At least in the UK, males are recognised as possible victims of rape by other males, and made to penetrate scenarios are recognised as "causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent", under s4 of the Sexual Offences Act. India is definitely worse as there is literally no law prohibiting sexual assault against adult males. Even the supposedly gender-neutral POCSO Act seems to ignore women sexually assaulting male minors.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 06:00 PM
14

Utterly unjust
/r/MensRights29/11/24 02:44 PM
99

If the POCSO Act is truly gender-neutral, the female parties would be the perpetrators in such cases (e.g. see this (use Google translate) and this). And the court called the perp a lady. Doesn't the term "lady" denote a dignified woman? It's like calling a male rapist a gentleman.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 02:40 PM
1

I'm not certain how widespread these charges are, but in this particular case, I believe the charge to be unjust. He neither encouraged her to take her own life nor assisted in her suicide. While charging him with harassment might be reasonable, charging him with aiding and abetting suicide seems unjustifiable.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 06:03 AM
2

No worries
/r/MensRights29/11/24 02:05 AM
8

The boyfriend called her before she killed herself, earlier that day, and said one day she would die by suicide. I can't find this info anywhere in the article. From what I read, the deceased was the one who called her boyfriend to inform him of her intention. The boyfriend rushed back to her upon hearing that but was too late. Excerpts from the article Police said that in the early hours of Monday, Tuli had called Pandit - who was on his way to Delhi by road - and said that she would die by sui…
/r/MensRights29/11/24 12:23 AM
35

India is definitely worse since there is literally no legal safeguard for adult male victims. For male minors, whilst the POCSO Act may be gender-neutral in plain writing, it may as well not be with the blatantly biased prosecutorial discretion (e.g. see this (use Google translate) and this).
/r/MensRights16/11/24 03:05 PM
2

IMO, sexual assault (with the man as the victim) and misrepresentation (e.g. the female partner lied about having her tubes tied to convince the man into having raw intercourse) are about the only circumstances where a man should have the right to decide whether to keep or abort his child.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:22 PM
9

One carriage exclusively for women (and their young children) and one exclusively for men (and their young children). Alternatively, men pay lesser fares.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 12:05 PM
16

If I'm not mistaken, Elise Edith Bowerman, a prominent British feminist, was part of the White Feather Movement. She was also a RMS Titanic survivor along with her mom. I wonder if the women and children first doctrine played a role in their survival.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 12:10 AM
21

I wonder if they would defend a depressed father with the same enthusiasm. It is estimated that 25% of new fathers experience varying degrees of paternal postpartum depression (PPPD).
/r/MensRights01/11/24 12:14 PM
15

Calgary Harbor, Unity Shelter, Resilience Lodge.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 05:46 PM
14

Genital mutilation should be considered equal in severity to r*pe! Unfortunately, the maximum penalty for voluntarily causing grevious hurt (which includes emasculation) is a mere 7 years and possible fine. But unfortunately such offenses against men are not only ignored, but also decriminalized according to Indian laws! Let's not forget that adultery is now essentially a male-only offence. The original gender-neutral adultery provision (s497 of IPC) was abolished, but the BNS retained s498 (Ent…
/r/MensRights24/10/24 04:54 AM
5

Not all men are fathers, but all fathers are men. My original comment is meant as a casual remark, and it's not related to the topic.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:16 AM
6

It's an appropriate description for fathers.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:11 AM
77

It's like saying Pablo Escobar is less culpable than his mules.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 02:53 PM
7

I'm not a proponent of surgical castration for any gender, but if male offenders are liable for it, so should female offenders.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 03:22 PM
13

I'm not American either, but as far as I'm aware, what I said is true. You can find some info here.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 07:08 AM
9

Numerous girls would be subjected to FGM if there were no explicit laws against it.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 04:52 AM
35

Castration (both physical and chemical) for sexual offenders. As far as I'm aware, female offenders are exempted.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 04:51 AM
20

The laws are section 16 and 17 of the Sexual Offences Act. In such cases, the effective age of consent is 18.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 10:26 AM
13

Back in primary school, a female classmate and I had a quarrel in class that led to her throwing my pencil case out the window. During recess, I returned the favour by throwing her water bottle into the school pond. As punishment, I was publicly caned on stage (3 strokes) in front of the entire school. For her, her mother was called, and she was given a stern talking to by the principal. As a boy, I was subjected to a much more severe form of punishment even though her misconduct was more severe…
/r/MensRights04/10/24 12:32 AM
13

I think a plea deal is unnecessary and unjust in the presence of overwhelming evidence like in this case, where there's video evidence of her administering the drug into her victim.
/r/MensRights03/10/24 03:06 PM
37

She pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy to import a controlled substance, importation of controlled substances, conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance and distribution of a controlled substance that resulted in death. So she was the one who delibretely administered the poison into the victim but wasn't charged with murder or even manslaughter?
/r/MensRights03/10/24 12:05 PM
1

They published the name of the victim but not the assailant?
/r/MensRights03/10/24 12:01 PM
11

Maybe this author is suffering from hysteria.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 04:56 AM
2

She'll be Charged for what? She could be charged with s307 of IPC for attempted murder and s326 of IPC for voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 03:26 AM
78

Sentence disparity is something you will not see in any gender inequality index.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 10:11 AM
119

She's on bail because under s437(1) of the Indian Code Of Criminal Procedure, women have special rights to be granted bail for non-bailable offences. Abetting suicide Is a non-bailable offence in India.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 05:26 AM
52

reverse gender gaps favour girls by 2 percentage points. Reverse gender gaps lol
/r/MensRights22/09/24 02:54 PM
21

So if a man did that, he is no longer a man and thus not liable for conscription?
/r/MensRights16/09/24 03:03 AM
9

Yes and while not ok not the same in terms of affect as focible rape. I bet he'd think differently if some dude made his daughter polish his prostate with her tongue.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/09/24 11:03 AM
33

Classic hypocrisy, considering feminists have pressed for gender-neutral terminology like firefighter and police officer to be adopted in the place of their gendered counterparts.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 04:04 PM
1

Despite women outnumbering men nearly two to one amongst the undergraduate population, I don't remember seeing any male-only or male-centric programs even in female dominated courses like nursing and early childhood education.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 12:27 AM
11

Yes, it is, blatantly so.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 11:59 AM
2

but I do hope there is some recourse for the family to pursue custody if they choose. As far as I'm aware, custody reversal/transfer after adoption is rare. I think it's almost impossible for the father to secure custody (if that's what he wants), especially if the child has already settled well into her new family. The overarching principle is "the best interest of the child." As unfortunate as the situation is, uprooting the child from a loving family and a familiar environment can be extremel…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 12:40 AM
9

It blows my mind that someone who was found guilty of sexual assault of a minor would get custody at all. Yeah. Unfettered, unsupervised custody. Personally, I wonder why the father’s family didn’t take the child. There could be many factors. The father and his family may not want or even hated the child since he/she is a product of rape and only exists because the father does not have the legal right to abort him/her. The court did not award custody or access to the father. The mother unilatera…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 12:25 AM
3

I believe that in such cases, unless the father somehow has the legal authority to decide on the termination or birth of the child, he should have the option to surrender his parental rights (and responsibilities). The state (especially safe haven states) can offer modest financial assistance should the mother decide to birth the child but is genuinely unable to afford to raise him/her. The amount can be decided by factoring the reasonable expenses of the child, assets and earning capacity of th…
/r/MensRights20/08/24 11:57 PM
34

In the US, Hermesmann v. Seyer set the precedent that a woman is entitled to sue the father of her child for child support even if conception occurred as a result of a criminal act committed by the woman.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 06:24 AM
34

As far as I'm aware, under India's legislation, a woman cannot be charged with any sexual offences against an adult victim.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 04:03 PM
6

Quite a number of comments were justifying what she did. One was even calling for the boys to face criminal action for "abetting" her.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 04:09 PM
3

The group with more freedom is somehow the oppressed one.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 11:28 AM
68

In most developed societies, women and girls have more liberty than men and boys when it comes to grooming standards, and it's not just limited to workplaces. Most schools have some kind of gendered grooming standards. Generally, boys can only wear short hair while girls can wear theirs both long or short. Girls can also wear ear accessories if they wish, but boys can't. The same is true for prisons. In my country, it is mandatory for male inmates (except Skihs and Tamils) to shave their heads, …
/r/MensRights07/08/24 05:23 PM
60

We had had family discussions about consent so he is able to navigate confusing signals well enough. I wonder if he was told that his consent is equally important. Unfortunately, in many such conversations, consent is a unilateral concept, something that a man seeks from a woman.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 11:46 AM
24

It wouldn't be nearly as bad if male passengers are allowed the same option.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 12:49 PM
1

The modesty of men are treated as secondary.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 01:41 PM
1

Both clothed and strip searches.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 12:50 PM
1

I believe it is the preferred position. However, it is not mandatory. For example, if no male officers are readily available, female officers can conduct such procedures too. On the flipside, only female officers can conduct such procedures on female subjects, regardless of circumstances.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 09:37 AM
7

In Singapore, female officers are authorized to conduct body searches on all individuals, while male officers are restricted to conducting body searches on female suspects only in cases where terrorism is suspected and female officers are not immediately available at the scene. Similarly, forensic medical examinations involving sensitive procedures such as swabbing of genitals and photographing intimate areas are exclusively performed by female staff on female subjects. Male subjects may request…
/r/MensRights27/07/24 02:51 AM
12

Hi. What is your definition of feminism?
/r/MensRights20/06/24 01:39 PM
22

Sorry to play the DA but it's possible that the stats are swayed based on women being less likely to go out at night alone. There's no need to be sorry. It's most likely a significant factor. I'm not sure what the stats would be with all variables corrected, if that's possible at all.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 02:46 PM
130

Generally, it describes the phenomenon of which certain demographics (i.e. women and the elderly) are more fearful of becoming victims of crime than other demographics (i.e. men and young people), although statistically, the former is less likely to become victims than the latter.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 07:11 AM
169

I think I read somewhere that women feel more threatened walking out in public alone while men are actually assaulted more often and are more often seriously injured from these assaults. It's called the fear victimisation paradox.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 06:35 AM
50

"By using available federal databases, the [Selective Service] agency will be able to register all of the individuals required and thus help ensure that any future military draft is fair and equitable," Except it's not "fair and equitable" when half the population is exempted by birthright.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 06:00 AM
5

Indeed. Having different sentencing frameworks means non-rape offences are lesser offences.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 02:22 PM
98

found guilty of offences including grooming, inciting sex with a child, inciting sexual activity with a child and sexual assault by touching. It would be rape of a child under 13 if the genders were flipped.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 10:23 AM
45

The female equivalent is oophorectomy, but I don't think it's gonna be used as a punishment, just like how chemical castration is used almost exclusively on male offenders.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 02:30 PM
2

There is no quota for men. This means that hypothetically, women can hold 100% of the positions whilst men can only hold 70% at most.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 01:06 PM
1

it is not fair to force taxpayers (including other men) to support your child. Safe haven laws contradict this.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 12:14 AM
165

Systemic discrimination against men in the nursing field. 80 percent of nursing positions in AIIMS institutions are reserved for women. 90% of nursing positions in Maharashtra’s district hospitals are reserved for women.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 04:49 PM
65

I'm guessing this entitlement is only for women, and men aren't eligible for maintenance even if their partner out-earn them.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 03:32 PM
38

It's like women sit on men's laps on a regular basis.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 05:33 AM
12

they are inviting a woman to take advantage of them. I'm not sure what u mean by "take advantage of them." I don't think it's remotely unreasonable if it means women stealing quick glances at their cars and watches.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 04:44 PM
162

Such conduct is very unbecoming, but it does seem like girls are more likely to get away with this kind of behaviour. Some girls from my niece's secondary school made a "smash, pass, or kill" list of their fellow male students, and as far as I am aware, there were no consequences.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 01:29 PM
6

If anything, I believe there's a drop in the factual number of offenders. The increase in reporting may be attributed to the evolving legal and social landscape.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:12 AM
1

There isn't any mensrights group in Singapore, at least to my knowledge.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 04:53 AM
1

or is it that when men try to, they get refused by these same organizations because of misandry? If you're talking about the DV shelters, they are dedicated women DV shelters to start with, so men are explicitly ineligible by default. They are private organisations but I'm unsure if they receive any form of public funding. As far as I know, there is no dedicated DV shelter for men, much less fathers with children tagging along.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 03:59 AM
1

Singapore. To be fair, it is probably rare for men to seek DV shelter with their kids, so it doesn't make economic sense to the government and society to have dedicated DV shelters for such circumstances.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 03:45 AM
1

If they have kids than they will be accepted by a dv shelter (according to her). If I'm not mistaken, I think the situation is the opposite in my country. As there are virtually no male DV/IPV shelters, male victims are likely to be housed in homeless shelters and halfway houses, and these places do not admit children, at least not in the same facility as their fathers. On the flip side, there are multiple female IPV/DV shelters here, but they only admit the male children of victims if they are …
/r/MensRights03/05/24 12:04 AM
7

A significant downside is not having any say in it.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:06 AM
2

It's as though women can impregnate themselves and/or other women.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 04:12 PM
10

Guilt by proximity.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:51 AM
25

Would it be an offence if only men did it, or would both men and women be possible perpetrators?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 12:46 AM
31

Years ago, I've glanced through an article about criminal castration in the US. If I remember correctly, some states do (or did) allow chemical castration for female sex offenders, but virtually no such orders were made because the court has full judical discretion. I also remember a separate article that reported the drug used for chemical castration is not effective on women.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 03:43 PM
211

A 2008 Louisiana law says that men convicted of certain rape offenses may be sentenced to chemical castration. They can also elect to be physically castrated. Is castration a punishment that only male offenders are liable for?
/r/MensRights28/04/24 05:59 AM
12

Doubt there would be any marches.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 05:56 AM
2

It would not be in Singapore since the law doesn't permit institutional corporal punishment on women and girls.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/24 11:57 AM
2

The specifics were not mentioned in the article.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/24 12:53 PM
8

which country is this? Singapore. Caning is an asian thing, right? It's a British legacy.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/24 11:50 AM
31

The offence carries a jail term of between two and seven years and caning. Do note that female offenders are exempted from caning.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/24 08:28 AM
2

How is masculinism anti-feminist when it has the same general definition?
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:13 AM
10

No, I can't. I'm not in favour of lowering standards for any roles. Most notably in uniformed services (military, police, civil defence) with regard to physical proficiency.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 03:20 PM
17

Condemned male prisoners were observed with erections after being hanged. Doesn't necessarily mean they enjoyed it.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 05:30 PM
30

Oprah Winfrey is shivering with anticipation.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 11:45 AM
-29

I missed that part. Thanks for pointing that out.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 07:09 AM
97

At least in my jurisdiction, self-induced incapacitation is not a valid mitigating factor. In some cases, it may even be an aggravating factor.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 06:06 AM
444

Self-induced incapacitation isn't a defence for DUI and sexual assault cases, so why is it so for homicide?
/r/MensRights17/03/24 05:48 AM
12

So why is she still anonymous?
/r/MensRights13/03/24 11:41 AM
10

November 9th is International Men's Day, It's actually on 19 Nov.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 02:02 AM
18

For some reason, the identity of the victim was publicised.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 06:19 AM
87

I like how the article continues to refer to her as "the victim." I guess there wouldn't be any charges for furnishing false information.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 05:56 AM
1

Yes SK too, though I'm not sure how stringently such provisions are enforced.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 05:08 AM
29

If I remember correctly, women in China and Japan must technically seek their spouse's consent if they wish to terminate their child. That said, I think it's not really enforced. I read that in Japan, a woman can ask her male friend to tag along with her to the abortion clinic to act as her husband. No verification is required.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 05:55 PM
6

Porn producer/distributor vs consumer.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 02:53 AM
66

Maybe these male influencers can lead the boys to stand and apologise for being born.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 12:48 PM
15

Under s437(1)(ii) of the Indian Code Of Criminal Procedure, women have special rights to be granted bail for non-bailable offences.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 02:46 PM
9

Did sex occur at the material time? Correct me if I'm wrong but if sex did occur, by virtue of s114A of the Evidence Act the onus is on him to prove that it was consensual, instead of the prosecution proving that it was not. Essentially, it's guilty until proven innocent.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 01:05 PM
2

One the premise of voluntary, informed consent, none of the jobs can be said to be exploitative. Such people are free to not participate if they wish.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/24 09:22 AM
5

What's the context here? What does "being forced" entail? Does it mean one is being subjected to work involuntarily due to violence/threats/intimidation? Or does it mean one is "forced" to work in a job they don't like (likely because the renumeration is better than other jobs).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/24 09:09 AM
5

It doesn't. Legally, the criminality of the child's mother is independent from the father's civil liability to provide for his child. Hermesmann v. Seyer is a notable example.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 11:19 AM
13

The stats aren't in their favour tbh. Excerpt from Substantiated Incidents of Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Correctional Authorities, 2016–2018 by the Bureau of Justice. There were 1,598 perpetrators of staff sexual misconduct and 716 perpetrators of staff sexual harassment. Two-thirds (67%) of staff sexual misconduct perpetrators were female and a third (33%) was male. The distribution by sex for staff perpetrators of sexual harassment was the opposite: 69% male and 31% female.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 03:59 AM
6

All is justifiable since she was in a dark place then /s
/r/MensRights21/02/24 03:12 AM
3

U mean prostate cancer?
/r/MensRights19/02/24 11:44 PM
1

Prosecution is impossible if the boy isn't willing to testify.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 06:20 PM
9

Primary custody ought to be reversed to the father.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 08:26 AM
5

Does it go either way?
/r/MensRights08/02/24 04:27 PM
2

Largely yes. As far as I know, section 24/25 of the Hindu Marriage Act is the only statutory provision that allows husbands to seek spousal maintenance from their wives. In practice, it is reserved for Hindu men who are unable to provide for themselves due to physical or mental incapacitation sustained before or during the marriage. This right is only available to Hindu men, as non-Hindus are not allowed to marry under the Hindu Marriage Act. They can instead marry under the Special Marriage Act…
/r/MensRights08/02/24 12:32 PM
1

Technically, the law recognises both boys and girls as possible perpetrators. However, it's enforced in a gendered manner. I have yet to see a female minor charged for having sex with another minor. It's always the male parties who were prosecuted, even when they too were minors.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 05:50 PM
25

False allegations of sexual violence typically attract very lenient sentences in SG (see this, this and this) Meanwhile, the sentence for rape starts at 10 years jail and no less than 6 strokes of the cane.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 09:17 PM
48

Fear victimisation paradox
/r/MensRights15/01/24 03:55 PM
4

£600000 seems plentiful when one consider the fact that Andrew Malkinson is only eligible for a maximum of £1m for spending 17 years in jail for a wrongful rape conviction.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 07:51 PM
2

but the situation changes in rape cases where man is supposed to prove that there was consent during the sexual intercourse. Yes, I mean circumstances within the purview of 114A and 114B. It is absolutely preposterous for the onus to be on the defendants to prove their innocence.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 06:23 AM
1

Thanks for replying. Since one is deemed guilty until proven innocent, does this mean the burden of proof falls on the defendant?
/r/MensRights09/01/24 06:13 AM
17

Well she was pretty….so…. It's almost like being attractive is a mitigating factor.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 03:48 AM
3

Can I ask if section 114A and 114B of the Evidence Act are being actively enforced?
/r/MensRights09/01/24 12:17 AM
5

Great find. It's rare to find a study with >1000 respondents that focuses exclusively on male victims and female perpetrators. Also, I wonder about the purview of harassment in this study. Does being looked at the "wrong" way count?
/r/MensRights25/12/23 02:18 PM
13

The same goes for elderly people. It's known as the fear victimisation paradox.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 12:28 PM
5

So men were not ignored as victims. They were, to an extent. Research on male sexual victimization remains significantly underexplored compared to studies focusing on female victims, with most findings confined within academic circles and not effectively influencing public policies. That said, female on female sexual violence is probably even less studied.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 07:44 AM
8

I believe that an offence should not be constituted if a minor delibretely concealed the fact that he/she is underage, and/or actively deceived the major into believing that he/she is of consenting age, and that the major reasonably believed that the minor is of consenting age. In fact, honest but mistaken belief is a defense in some jurisdictions such as the UK. This is one such case. However, there is a limit. In the UK, for instance, one cannot rely on this defense if the minor is under 13.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 04:35 PM
30

Disparities in sentencing represent only a fraction of the problem. Women are statistically less prone to being arrested, prosecuted, and convicted for identical crimes. In certain countries, specific offenses don't acknowledge women as potential perpetrators, absolving them from facing charges for such crimes. Furthermore, some countries impose male-specific penalties, such as caning/whipping and various forms of castration (both physical and chemical).
/r/MensRights08/12/23 06:29 PM
2

For what? For procreation? It's not as if there aren't any precedent. Who would volunteer? Aspiring surrogate mothers.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 03:58 AM
1

Surrogacy.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 03:22 AM
38

So no postmortem egg retrieval for dead women?
/r/MensRights02/12/23 05:47 AM
2

It's ridiculously archaic. The relevant legislation was from 1955 and 1939 for New Zealand and Singapore respectively.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 09:23 AM
10

The restriction only applies unilaterally. Single women are eligible to adopt children of any gender.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 05:29 AM
16

Some countries, like New Zealand and Singapore, expressly prohibit single men from adopting girls. I could see a similar policy being extended to the artificial womb domain.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 12:47 AM
47

It's a skit promoting the implementation of male-only carriages. The description of the video is translated using ChatGPT. Currently, a video featuring "false accusations of groping" is gaining significant attention on social media. In response to incidents of false accusations and other related issues, a temporary, male-only train carriage has been introduced on the tram service. ■ Last year, 2,233 cases of groping arrests, nearly half... The video starts from casual scenes in everyday train li…
/r/MensRights20/11/23 06:36 PM
8

He should at least receive back pay for the duration of his suspension.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 05:11 AM
3

Is there an equal number of lots further from the entrance/exit that are reserved for men? If not, not only are women getting better lots, they effectively get more lots too.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 12:10 AM
2

Are you saying that, when the parents of a four year old divorce, they should be able to give their four year old up for adoption if they want to? Even now, parents are allowed to jointly put up their child for adoption regardless of their marital status. In my country, the child has to be unmarried and an infant (legal term for a person under 21 years of age).
/r/MensRights06/11/23 04:41 AM
3

One cannot choose to send their child into foster care. Generally, children who require foster care have a genuine need for it. They may have been hurt by abuse or neglect, or are unable to be cared for by their parents who may be ill, incarcerated or have passed away. However, both parents may legally place their child up for adoption.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 04:33 AM
9

Now imagine the mother and father want to get a divorce. Should the father be able to abandon his financial responsibilities to the child? If a couple divorce, should a mother's responsibility towards her child be absolved? The default position should be no, regardless if it's the mother or father. The breakdown of a marriage should have no bearing on one's responsibility towards his/her child. However, I'm in favour of a man having the right to absolve his responsibility in special circumstance…
/r/MensRights06/11/23 04:17 AM
24

In jurisdictions where abortion is legal and the man is aware of the pregnancy, the man should be able to terminate his parental rights and liabilities up to the statutory periviable period. If the decision to abort was made jointly by a couple, both should contribute financially for the abortion procedure. A man should not be responsible for a child if the child is conceived due to sexual assault or fraudulent means perpetrated by the child's mother.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 12:45 AM
142

Repulsive
/r/MensRights03/11/23 05:12 AM
79

Instead she was ordered to pay the victim £150 in compensation plus £172 in costs and a victim surcharge. JP Mark Turner, in sentencing, told her: “The offence on that evening was not predatory - it was basically, as we see it, a drunken joke that goes wrong. So self-induced intoxication is an absolute defense now? I wonder if this case would set a precedent.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 12:28 AM
172

Does the program include forcing boys to stand and apologise for their birth?
/r/MensRights28/10/23 11:50 AM
9

The prohibition of physical punishment is explicitly found in the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009. The school and teacher should be taken to task.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/23 11:34 PM
44

Such an approach is fairly common. For instance, the Global Gender Gap Report by WEF only penalise domains where men are advantaged while disregarding the reverse.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 09:28 AM
61

The judgment was made in 2018. However, from an 2007 article, the court ruled that the married woman in question can live with her lover, and that her actions did not amount to adultery (but her lover's actions did, inexplicably). On the other end, in 2011, Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy found a man guilty of having an affair and sentence him to 6 months of rigorous imprisonment (he was initially sentenced to 2 years), of which he was subjected to hard labour. If an extramarital relationship o…
/r/MensRights15/10/23 07:43 AM
2

I'm slightly apprehensive of the introduction of such a minister. If passed, part of me thinks the post's primary function would be to combat 'toxic masculinity'.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 01:55 AM
10

With a scope that broad, I'm amazed it's not 99.99% of all human beings.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 04:09 PM
52

Stender says regardless of how valid the defamation claim is, the suits can have a “chilling effect” among sexual assault survivors... As if victims of false accusations aren't real victims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/23 12:42 AM
9

It will guide Australia’s actions to protect and promote the human rights of all women and girls. [...]the National Plan to End Violence against Women and Children 2022-2032, and Australia’s National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security 2021-31. They are quite explicit about it.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 04:05 AM
19

If they do that, their woke points are going to be in the negative.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:21 AM
70

They should go all out and feature a Black boy.
/r/AntiFeminists05/09/23 04:30 PM
6

Page 53 of WEF GGGR 2022 [...]Hence, the index rewards countries that reach the point where outcomes for women equal those for men, but it neither rewards nor penalizes cases in which women are outperforming men in particular indicators in some countries. Thus, a country that has higher enrolment for girls rather than boys in secondary school will score equal to a country where boys’ and girls’ enrolment is the same.
/r/MensRights01/09/23 02:46 AM
3

You can argue about the response not being equal without diminishing that what he did was wrong. Exactly, they are not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 05:19 PM
3

In general, policies wouldn't move without broad ground support and consensus, especially for highly intrusive and controversial ones such as conscription. A poll was conducted last year for the Polish population and it found that more women than men are in favour of male-only conscription.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 02:13 PM
5

The only way out is to receive a royal prerogative of mercy. This is only granted in very exceptional circumstances.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 03:25 PM
11

Yes, so are many other sports.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:35 PM
143

The greater issue is that there's no men's category in chess. Women are eligible for both the open and women's categories, but men are only eligible for the former. There's a structural inequality of opportunity here since being a woman entitles one to participate in more events (and win more tournaments and money) by defualt.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:18 PM
39

The body positivity movement was created by women — specifically Black women That's like saying that since white men created suffrage, others should not get to vote.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 04:55 PM
10

It's positive in that sense, but I fear there are also shortcomings. The foundation of this campaign seems to be premised on the male perpetrator/female victim paradigm. Whilst I believe the underpinning law (likely under the Public Order Act 1986) for this campaign is gender-neutral, I don't believe the undercover cops are going to enforce it without prejudice. Do you think the cops are going to go after women who catcall men/women and men who catcall other men with the same pertinacity?
/r/MensRights16/08/23 12:13 PM
7

I'm not sure anyone would take it seriously. That's unfortunate to hear. Still, if he wishes to pursue, he can still try. Gather his witnesses (yourself included) and go to the principal to call on an investigation. The victim may tell the principal that he would be going to the police if an investigation is not conducted. He can also threaten to sue the school for negligence. If the victim wishes to pursue a criminal case, he can report this incident to the police, provided what the girl did co…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 09:41 AM
13

Depending on your friend's wishes, he can try to escalate the issue up the school hierarchy.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 08:43 AM
1

But his name is on the birth cert, wouldn't that make him the legal father? From what I know, in most instances, this is enough for him to be liable for child support. Therefore, for this case, how is it the case that he has no legal rights to the child but is concurrently legally obligated to support the child?
/r/MensRights16/08/23 02:14 AM
1

As 'punishing' as the ruling is, it's sort of meaningless. Make voyeurism an explicit criminal offence and enforce it.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 11:47 PM
16

That's a scary figure. It's one thing for a man to knowingly and voluntarily adopt the role of a father for a child that isn't his. Being taken for a ride and having no legal recourse is another thing.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 10:48 AM
34

Perhaps the end goal is to prevent the government from being obligated for child maintenance. If true, this probably implies that the government knows there's a substantial population of cuckolds out there.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 05:28 AM
1

She outright lied. OP's post edited the post and added more content. My comment pertains to only the first paragraph. I got lied to too, not about body count, but something probably more important. I'm sorry for your experience. I hope you are doing well.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 06:07 PM
3

You certainly are required to give a truthful response. If you do not want to tell the number, say so. I don't recommend lying. Be forthright with your partner. If you're reluctant to divulge, speak frankly. A reasonable partner should respect that, and this respect should be mutual.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 03:47 PM
9

Is it a man’s right to know your body count? I don't believe it's anybody's right to compel their partners to divulge their sexual history. One may ask, but don't demand. If you have slept with a lot of other people is it ok to have kids and not tell him? Just like having STD, having a child from a previous relationship is different from not divulging one's "body count." It is a distinctive issue and has its own implications, especially if one is to marry their current partner. For example, one …
/r/MensRights09/08/23 01:52 PM
8

I agree that it is less likely for society to sympathise with male child killers. Nonetheless, there was this case in Singapore which garnered much sympathy from the public. A father killed his 11 year old special need twin sons. He was found to have major depressive disorder of moderate severity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/23 11:27 AM
48

It is interesting how many commenters automactically assumed she was experiencing post-partum depression, despite the fact that it wasn't even mentioned in the article, and tried to justify her actions. While psychological issues can be mitigating factors, they do not absolve liability entirely unless there are exceptional circumstances. Some claimed that she was suffering from post-partum psychosis, which may result in her having no control over her killing. The article made no mention of this.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/23 08:43 AM
488

He will soon obtain a driver’s license, and later get a voter’s registration. Think that's also around the time when he gets his Selective Service System registration notice.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 02:18 PM
125

Faces 600 years, not sentenced to 600 years. The maximum possible sentence is not a good indicator of the actual sentence.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:38 AM
2

It does indeed sound awful, especially when it is imposed on a specific demographic by the way they are born.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 02:40 PM
10

Commuting the sentences of every woman sentenced to death for an offence that does not involve an intentional killing committed by the woman. Essentially, they are asking for women to be sentenced less harshly by default solely because they are female, regardless of case specific factors. To some extent, female offenders in Singapore are already subjected to lesser punishment. Caning, which is prescribed for a variety of offences, is only applicable for men below the age of 50. An enhanced sente…
/r/MensRights04/08/23 05:14 AM
155

Link for the article. [...] Therefore, the possibility of the appellant causing the death of the deceased while being deprived of the power of self-control, due to the provocation on account of the deceased not agreeing to pay Rs.500/- to PW-1, cannot be ruled out," the top court observed. If someone is to club their spouse to death because the latter did not agree to cook or perform domestic chores, will the court see it as a provocation of equal measure? Will it be deemed a case of self-contro…
/r/MensRights02/08/23 01:05 PM
11

Sounds like a miniature form of slavery Speaks volume when our constitution goes all out to expressly exempt NS as a form of slavery.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 02:23 AM
16

Going for another cycle of useless ICT tomorrow to waste 2 weeks of my life, along with summary trial for defaulting IPT.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 01:00 AM
5

No idea, the info isn't available. The article reported that the nature of their relationship is unclear. It is also not stated if their relationship predates the one he has with his fiancee.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 07:38 PM
11

He didn't have a wife then. They matched on the dating site in 2020. He subsequently broke off with her in 2022 and moved to another state with his then fiancee, who later became his wife.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 07:25 PM
51

Some women rights activists fear that speaking of abuse against men might steer the narrative from the abuse of women and children. And they say feminism is not a zero-sum game.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 06:09 PM
7

Would the father be liable for any child support? Also, if a couple had their embryos frozen prior to their divorce, can the man proceed with gestational surrogacy if the wife does not give her consent?
/r/MensRights27/07/23 02:57 PM
-43

It's perfectly fine for the wife to not pay for the husband's trip. She's bearing the lion's share of household expenses. The guy's spending his earnings on his hobby, which has no direct benefits for the family.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 06:27 PM
25

Even if he gets the maximum restitution, it's only £1 million.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 03:41 PM
56

Ironic, considering what they did with The Red Pill movie (by Cassie Jaye).
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:48 AM
19

I don't know about other countries, but in Singapore, delibretely lying about or compromising contraception is a crime if a man does it (e.g. lying about having a vasectomy) but not a crime if it's a women (e.g. lying about having IUD, tubal ligation). This is explicitly spelt out in the law (refer to s376H(3)(c)(i) and (ii)).
/r/MensRights25/07/23 02:41 PM
3

I don't see how it's reasonable for character reference to be a non-factor for CSA cases but relevant for other offences. Either retain the current system or abolish the use of character references as mitigating factors for all kinds of offences.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:48 AM
1

If a man says "mate," is he asking for consent?
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:07 AM
4

Indian rape law under IPC does not recognise males as possible victims and females as possible perpetrators. Since the girl in the story was under the age of 18, the 12 year old brother had technically committed rape, even if she was the one who forced him into the act. The POSCO Act, which deals with sexual offences against children, is gender-neutral. However, for cases involving sex between minors, I have yet to come across a case where the girl was prosecuted. It looks like gender-neutral la…
/r/MensRights16/07/23 12:22 PM
17

I believe there was a case in Singapore, of which a boy was sentenced to probation for having consensual sex with a girl but the latter was described as the "victim" The boy and girl were 14 and 15 years old at the material time.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 05:31 PM
26

Out of B-C, which scenario would you want to see the underage girl charged with something? None of the above. However, I would like to see her, and especially her, prosecuted and punished.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 05:26 PM
35

I'm speaking generally, not just of this particular case or cases in the UK.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 05:14 PM
109

I don't think I've ever come across a case of which a girl was prosecuted and convicted for consensual underage sex. It's always the boys who got sanctioned.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 12:19 PM
36

Indeed. The ball was not in the court for that one.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 04:03 PM
245

All lawsuits against the school and defendants were dismissed
/r/MensRights11/07/23 02:28 PM
22

Because he is not married to his son's mother, legally, Jennings had no parental rights. “My name’s on the birth certificate. I'm not familiar with Florida or US family legislation, so correct me if I'm wrong. If a father's name is on the birth cert, doesn't that mean he has legal parental responsibility? If so, doesn't that also mean he has parental rights? How is it the case where he has the former but not the latter?
/r/MensRights23/06/23 02:55 AM
30

And he doesn't have custody of his child. I doubt there's even any meaningful access granted.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 03:55 AM
1

Essentially, for non-bailable offences, granting bail to female suspects is the default position. It is seemingly very rare for exceptions to be made. Take this case for instance, where a woman is granted bail for allegedly murdering her husband. The court granted her bail as the facts of the case are "not so grave" (what an irony). While looking at the conduct of the accused for having surrendered before the police for alleged murder, and she has no prior criminal record, hence granting bail sh…
/r/MensRights16/06/23 01:52 PM
2

Under subsection 1(ii) such person shall not be so released if such offence is a cognizable offence and he had been previously convicted of an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for seven years or more, or he had been previously convicted on two or more occasions of a non- bailable and cognizable offence: Provided that the Court may direct that a person referred to in clause (i) or clause (ii) be released on bail it such person is under the age of sixteen years …
/r/MensRights16/06/23 11:49 AM
20

Under s437(1)(ii) of the Indian Code Of Criminal Procedure, women have special rights to be granted bail for non-bailable offences.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 12:26 AM
24

Causing suicide is akin to criminal homicide under PA state law.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 06:18 PM
13

Perhaps the mass implementation of female urinals is part of the solution.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 02:11 AM
21

Moving forward, if she takes the kids out again for a prolonged period without your consent or knowledge, do the same as she did. Your kids should have little issues if you've been an involved father, and the trip is fun and meaningful.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 01:57 PM
6

You can, but she is probably entitled to a share of the proceeds. In most jurisdictions, the matrimonial residence is considered a matrimonial asset.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 02:33 PM
2

Unfortunately, I'm not well-versed with the laws, so I can't really answer you. That said, for the case in my original comment, the Ohio Supreme Court relied on DOJ's definition rather than the one from Ohio state law. However, the court stated that the overthrowing of the case is due to the narrow definition under Ohio state law. I find it puzzling since DOJ and Ohio have vastly different definitions. In actuality, the current definition under Ohio state law covers 'made to penetrate' scenarios…
/r/MensRights29/05/23 06:17 AM
8

OK, drumroll please, here's the 17 sta4tes that agree with the CDC An Ohio woman who caused her 2 year old son to sexually penetrate her had her rape conviction overthrown by the state Supreme Court due to a technicality regarding the legal definition of rape. I am puzzled by the ruling as Ohio Supreme Court used the DOJ/FBI definition and called it the state law. However, the actual definition under Ohio state law is nothing like the former. DOJ/FBI definition of rape the penetration, no matter…
/r/MensRights29/05/23 01:01 AM
305

They also have men-only carriages, but they are headed for the frontlines.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 11:40 AM
37

It's like saying it's reverse rape when women rape men.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 04:54 AM
91

And adjust the amount of tax one pays to commensurate with the quality and quantity of public amenities and services one's eligible for.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 04:47 AM
-6

Ukraine's situation is unfortunate, but AFAIK, the women there aren't conscripts. I'm referring to OP's claim that female conscripts in many nations can choose whether or not they wish to be deployed to the frontlines.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 12:45 PM
5

female conscripts cannot be sent to frontlines without their consent. Hi, do you have any specific examples? Thanks.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 12:14 AM
6

Common sense prevailed, unfortunately a rare thing nowadays.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 03:59 PM
8

I hope hospital janitors start filing suits for not having equal pay with heart surgeons.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 09:54 AM
39

Imagine her working in BBC.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 01:35 AM
9

If you live your gf for more than 3 years; She is entitled to half of his assets if the relationship breaks off. It’s called “de facto” relationship Is a man also entitled to half of his partner's assets? What if both parties are male or both female?
/r/MensRights17/05/23 10:03 AM
80

Boys ≠ humans 🤷
/r/MensRights15/05/23 02:12 PM
10

Feminist: If you're not a feminist, you're either a misandrist or a misogynist. Its pretty concerning that you're talking about feminists as a separate thing from what YOU are.... Mens rights is actually part of feminism, by definition. So like Ask if him/her is a masculist, since 'by definition', masculism and feminism are the same thing.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 12:22 PM
14

allow a civil action against any person causing an unintended pregnancy or any person aiding or abetting someone to have caused an unintended pregnancy. The way it is formulated sounds like (certainly not intended as) men can sue women for causing unintended pregnancy as well.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 01:34 PM
2

Largely no, at least not in most legal sense. Many jurisdictions have explicit parameters regarding sexual consent. For example, in Singapore, the boundaries are defined under s377CB of the Penal Code. Subsection 1 reads 377CB.—(1) Despite section 90(a)(ii), a consent for the purposes of an act which is the physical element of a sexual offence is not a consent given by a person under a misconception of fact only if it is directly related to — (a) the nature of the act, namely that it is not of a…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 01:02 AM
2

Excerpt from the 2017 NISVS: Contact sexual violence (women) - 54.3% Contact sexual violence (men) - 30.7% Are these the lifetime figures? Do you have access to the 'last 12 months' figures? To add on: If I remember the NISVS stats correctly, women are more likely to experience sexual violence in their life. But as for experiencing sexual violence within the last 12 months of a survey, the prevalence is comparable for both men and women. A reason for this disparity may be that men are less likel…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 03:21 AM
6

Basically the argument goes that it takes a lot longer for a woman to use a bathroom That may be true, but I believe it's primarily attributed to the urinal. This argument is not valid if there's no urinal in the neutral/handicapped toilet (it most likely didn't have one).
/r/MensRights27/04/23 11:30 PM
7

Try 'teaching' that to certain ethnicities.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 11:18 PM
15

In some countries (e.g. Singapore, Malaysia, etc), their laws explicitly prohibit corporal punishment on female students (and female prisoners).
/r/MensRights21/04/23 03:55 PM
60

Depraved as fuck if true. Also, are the other kids' parents ignorant or complicit?
/r/MensRights17/04/23 01:51 PM
2

The rising statistics is most likely attributed to increased reporting rather than a factual rise in cases.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 01:13 AM
3

I'm rather ignorant on these awdtsg groups. Are the identities (name, photo, address, etc) publicised? What kind of details or allegations are shared? Are there any guidelines that restrict the sharing of certain information? In many countries, there are doxxing laws that prohibit the publicising of such details. Some jurisdictions even have criminal defamation laws. From the few things I've heard about such groups, it's astounding how no charges were brought up.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 07:57 PM
3

Even this is merely 'for laughs'.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 02:59 PM
6

Takes one to know one.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 05:16 PM
12

Yes. But, the study also found that men were more likely to inflict harm that causes injury, and reciprocal IPV is associated with greater levels of injury.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/23 01:01 PM
88

The article is probably referring to this Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%) of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/23 09:24 AM
30

Justice Secretary Dominic Raab said this would mean "longer jail sentences for those who kill women in the home". Is he implying that a victim being female is an aggravating factor in itself?
/r/MensRights17/03/23 07:14 AM
10

Let's see if the Scottish parliament will give in to this baloney.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/23 05:05 PM
53

Women making unwanted sexually-motivated advances towards men, or discussing their sexual conquests in public, would not face sanctions under the legislation. Main takeaway
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/23 04:39 PM
3

No worries. I entirely agree with your original comment had there been no direct victim.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 04:58 AM
12

In January, during an interview with a District Attorney’s Office investigator, Gries is said to have admitted to lying about the rapes and written an apology letter to the man who was the target of her allegations. “She stated she was upset with the victim because she felt he gave her ‘false intention’ and turned her friends against her,” prosecutors said. There seems to be at least one direct vicitm.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 04:43 AM
65

“These false reports are damaging, both for true survivors of sexual assault and for the members of our community who experienced fear and alarm from the reports,”... Deliberately omitting the most significant (and obvious) demographic. They afraid of something?
/r/MensRights16/03/23 03:47 AM
6

Unfortunately, there's obviously distinctions between male and female rape simply by legal definitions. As rape has a harsher sentencing guideline compared to 'causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent', there is likely to be sentencing disparity between the two offences. ​​Ordering Lord to serve two years in jail and two under supervised licence conditions The accused is effectively ordered to serve 2 years in jail and 2 years of probation, excluding potential sentence remis…
/r/MensRights15/03/23 04:00 AM
6

Report her to the school administrator. If that didn't help, escalate it to whatever's the next level in your area.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 03:43 AM
214

Because putting others down is the best expression of empowerment.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 03:20 PM
19

Probably something resembling the magic carpet. The more important question is, why is Ford trying to stir shit when there is none?
/r/MensRights08/03/23 11:37 PM
24

This would be recorded as another case of violence against women and girls (VAWG)%20covers%20a%20range%20of,upskirting'%2C%20as%20well%20as%20many).
/r/MensRights25/02/23 01:01 PM
30

It is. Such incidents are probably grossly under-reported too. Young boys have also been raped by ISIS women in the Roj camp, where jihadi brides Begum and Muthana are held. At least they used the appropriate term somewhere in the article.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 02:27 PM
2

The defendant was cleared of stalking, involving fear or violence to cause serious alarm or distress, but she was found guilty of a lesser charge of stalking, without serious alarm or distress, between January 2021 and August 2022. Eh prolonged harassment and attempted murder don't cause serious alarm and distress?
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:27 AM
5

Are the toilets single or multi users?
/r/MensRights02/02/23 04:51 PM
8

Perhaps I'm a outlier but I don't readily associate with designations like feminist or anti-feminist or their counterparts. That doesn't mean I don't believe in the core ideals (e.g. men and women should have equal rights and opportunities) of certain strains of feminism. In fact, such ideals are shared with certain strains of masculism. I merely believe that people should be regarded as individuals first and foremost.
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 01:34 AM
8

Appalling isn't it? I hope he appeals the decision or files for a fresh application.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 03:45 AM
16

Forget jail. The judge even dismissed the victim's application for Safety Order.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 03:42 AM
5

Under this current system, a female billionaire is eligible for free rides whilst a male barely making workman wage isn't. The appropriate thing to do is to revamp the system to regard people as their own person and take their individual circumstances into account (e.g. to conduct a means-test for such benefits). Statistically, more women than men would likely be eligible for the benefits, but deserving men would not be denied. Furthermore, this would prevent abuse from high achieving women.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 11:43 AM
242

The prosecution’s demands were met by the judge in the case, resulting in a three months’ suspended prison sentence for the unidentified woman in the case, a fine of €500, and the completion of a citizenship values course. She did not serve a day in prison.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:46 AM
26

It's appalling that this came from the judge. 'In drink people can and often do things which are very out of character. I am sure the lady had been drinking during the course of the afternoon. 'She was a lady in high spirits who was hurried by her friends and taking last sips of alcohol in the process.' Firstly, he's shifting the blame to her supposed intoxication when he should very well know that self-inflicted intoxication or incapacitation of any sort is not a mitigating factor Secondly, a l…
/r/MensRights20/12/22 11:54 PM
14

This relative lack of liberty and additional gender-specific legal protections go hand in hand. Many laws concerning voyeurism explicitly cover only women's breasts.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 10:57 AM
25

These indexes do not measure gender equality or inequality to begin with. Page 53 of the Global Gender Gap Report 2022 (the study used in the article) states the following. The third distinguishing feature of the Global Gender Gap Index is that it ranks countries according to their proximity to gender equality rather than to women’s empowerment. Our aim is to focus on whether the gap between women and men in the chosen indicators has declined, rather than whether women are winning the so-called …
/r/MensRights06/12/22 12:55 AM
47

I believe it will in many contexts. Still, the objective of abolishing AA is not that it should benefit men, but that it allows fairness for individuals.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 03:48 AM
6

In Singapore, if consensual sex occurred between a man and a woman but the man had lied about contraception (e.g. lied about having a vasectomy), that's recognised as procurement of sexual activity by deception or false representation and is punishable with up to 10 years of imprisonment with fine, caning (a male-only punishment) or all of the above. Conversely, if a woman lied about contraception (e.g. lied about being on the pills, having a tubal ligation or IUD), that is not recognised as an …
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:57 AM
26

How is giving men equal legal protections a bad thing? Doing so doesn't take away existing legal protections for women. It just makes men eligible for the same protections.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 08:07 AM
4

It's blatant discrimination. If only society recognise the other way is too.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 03:03 AM
74

According to the Sentencing Council, the court may give an offender an absolute discharge. This means that the court has decided not to impose a punishment because the experience of going to court has been punishment enough. The glaring issue is that she did not even stood trial. Where did her experience of going to court came from?
/r/MensRights25/11/22 03:42 PM
13

Even senior police officials said if he was sexually abused, he should lodge a complaint with the police. The problem is that, as far as I'm aware, there's no law that recognise adult males as possible sexual assault victims of female perpetrators in India.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 04:03 PM
2

I see. In Singapore (where I live), there are no laws that grant mothers additional rights and privileges with regards to care & control (custody meant a different thing here and shared custody is the norm). However, principles set forth in precedents favour mothers with young children. For example, maternity bond is an explicit consideration whilst paternity bond isn't. With everything being equal, CC of young children is generally awarded to mothers.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 02:10 PM
3

Thanks again. Currently, is it still the default position for courts to award custody of children to mothers in the UK?
/r/MensRights21/11/22 02:02 PM
6

Thanks for the info. Does the Custody of Infants Act explicitly favours/favoured mothers over fathers pertaining to custody of children? Sorry I'm not from the UK.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 01:56 PM
4

The Tender Years Doctrine/Principle. As far as I'm aware, it's not actually a law but precedents established in family courts.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 01:39 PM
43

It's called the fear victimization paradox. In general, women and the elderly are more fearful of their safety despite the fact that men and younger people have a greater likelihood of experiencing harm.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 12:19 AM
-16

I agree. Retribution should not be the primary objective of the penal system.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 03:47 AM
6

Perhaps worse is that his name is now plastered all over the Internet.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 11:40 AM
36

Muslims who aren't terrorists give a hell lot of shit if you call them terrorists. How inexplicable.
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/22 03:22 PM
15

Rape and denial of rape by those in power is rampant there. Also, even when charges were filed, there were cases where family members remove those charges due to shame / being harrased. It's not a zero sum game. Both sexual violence and false accusations of sexual violence are reprehensible and victims on both sides deserve justice.
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/22 05:32 PM
2

I meant to say a reason rather than the reason. Thanks for highlighting. I have yet to see proof that Koss has actually influenced the FBI and CDC. She was a consultant and reviewer for the CDC and DOJ
/r/MensRights02/11/22 03:19 AM
11

Apparently in India, male victims of acid attacks are not eligible for full compensation, if any at all. Male victims also have to plead with the relevant authorities to have any hope in securing any compensation. This is unlike the case for female victims who receive compensation as a default position. Acid Attack Survivors: Implementing Their Right to Dignity The Court was highly critical of the compensation schemes at the time, noting the need for uniform, adequate and proportionate compensat…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 12:16 AM
23

She's arguably a reason why the CDC still classifies female perpetrated rape against males as 'made to penetrate' rather than rape. Most rape statistics do not account for 'made to penetrate' cases, thus omitting a substantial number of male victims and some female victims. Edit: the reason a reason
/r/MensRights01/11/22 07:19 AM
38

Not sure about the thread but Mary P. Koss is probably the person you are talking about. Excerpt from her Wikipedia page. On the issue of male victims of rape, Koss has written: "Although consideration of male victims is within the scope of the legal statutes, it is important to restrict the term rape to instances where male victims were penetrated by offenders. It is inappropriate to consider as a rape victim a man who engages in unwanted sexual intercourse with a woman." (Koss 1993 pp 206-207)…
/r/MensRights01/11/22 06:27 AM
49

That's like saying women appropriated voting.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 12:24 PM
178

Yeah comment section is a cesspit. Apparently, paying for all the bills is a sign that he isn't concerned about the wife and kids. Not wanting to be sexually violated means he's disregarding his wife's 'mental pain'. Working hard and having a burnout equates to being autistic.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 06:30 AM
54

I hope he's able to sue for the wrongful convictions.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 04:15 PM
25

Because most of the comments on Twitter and Reddit have already made him gross, even predator and paedophile. I wonder what they think of the story of a 19 year old male teen being engaged to a 56 year old grandma. The latter knew the former since he was 10 years old. Facebook users seem to think that age is just a number. Personally, a mutually consensual relationship between two majors shouldn't be anybody else's business unless exceptional elements (e.g. historical grooming) are present.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 01:18 PM
3

I guess it depends if the term "rape" is used generically (all non-consensual sexual conducts involving penetration) or in accordance with legal definition, which differs across jurisdictions. In my country, a man lying about or intentionally compromising contraception is not considered rape but rather as procurement of sexual activity by deception or false representation. Also, only men are recognised as possible perpetrators and women as possible victims with regards to lying/compromising cont…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 12:38 AM
55

By early 2022, she let boys take a glimpse at a photo of her vagina... She let boys... It's as though those boys were the active parties.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 06:11 PM
8

Childbearing is a noble thing. Women risk their health and life for the propagation of our species, not to mention decades of period pain and inconvenience in exchange for this ability. That said, the recognition of childbearing and the recognition of men's issues are not mutually exclusive. I don't believe any reasonable person is disregarding the implications of childbearing and childbirth. This is not a zero sum game. Edit: Congrats on your little bundle of joy. I hope all of you are doing we…
/r/MensRights09/10/22 03:35 PM
56

Don't expect any protest on the streets.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 10:32 AM
48

My god. I hope it is manifestly clear to the jury who's the victim. During the fight, Simon’s girlfriend allegedly stabbed the worker in the shoulder with a knife she had in her purse, according to Alba’s defense attorney — but she is not facing charges. Another ridiculous example of prosecutorial discretion.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 10:29 AM
141

Men get caught more. Not only that, women are less likely to be charged even when caught. Some jurisdictions also have gender-specific crimes (primarily sexual offences) so women are not liable for charges even when substantial evidence is present.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 09:17 AM
3

Regarding the second article, "Our society has not yet accepted that the woman of the household should contribute (financially). It is a woman's choice to work. She cannot be compelled to go to work. Just because she is a graduate, does not mean she cannot sit at home," Justice Dangre said. "Today I am a judge of this court. Tomorrow, suppose I may sit at home. Will you then say I am qualified to be a judge and shouldn't sit at home?" she said. It seems like in India, choice is only reserved for…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 12:10 AM
15

The argument for redshirting has its merits but I can't imagine it being particularly practical or popular, especially in my country where education for men is already delayed for at least two years due to mandatory national service.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/22 03:12 PM
3

I see. Thanks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 12:16 PM
4

With all due respect, do you mean refrain from expressing opinions rather than voting? At least from where I'm from, there is no specific public voting for women's health issues. That said, I believe that any individuals should be eligible to express their perspectives regarding public policies. For example, male-only conscription is practiced in my country, and women are involve in national surveys concerning conscription.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 11:53 AM
9

TIL in the UK accused persons can be identified prior to prosecution.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 11:32 AM
12

What's the rate for fake phone numbers?
/r/MensRights03/10/22 12:27 AM
40

Yes. She was found not guilty and we ought to presume her innocence. However, presuming a defendant's innocence and not trivialising male sexual victimisation are not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 12:07 PM
10

If I remember correctly, female inmates in the UK get the privilege to don causal clothings by default while male inmates has to earn that privilege. Female inmates also get to make free phone calls while male inmates has to pay for that service.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 03:54 AM
32

It is in mine. It is explicitly under s376H(3)(c)(i) of the Penal Code. On the flip side, it is not illegal for a woman to lie about or deliberately compromise contraception (if doing so didn't also compromise protection against STD). Compare the aforementioned provision with (3)(c)(ii).
/r/MensRights20/09/22 10:11 AM
54

Unfortunately, it's totally legal in some countries (including mine) while the reverse isn't.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 10:04 AM
130

A definitive yes. However, it is often conflated with the urging of exercising reasonable caution. This applies for victims of any gender and crime.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 12:51 AM
21

A popular narrative is that punishing people who make false sexual accusation is detrimental because it discourages true victims of sexual violence from reporting their ordeal. A great flaw of this argument is that it treats the entire issue as a monopoly of victimhood and totally disregards the very real impacts faced by victims of false sexual accusation. These victims aren't any less real.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 03:17 PM
38

But punishing false accusers harms real victims... As if victims of false accusation aren't real.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 02:17 PM
4

In principle, I believe it's reasonable that a man or boy has legal say in abortion (both for and against) if the child is conceived from sexual assault or deception by the child's mother. However, a criminal conviction must first be secured before the father can exercise this right. This means that in practice, such a right is very difficult to be exercised. While pregnancy last for around 40 weeks, a criminal conviction may take years. Nonetheless, it could be practicable for statutory rape ca…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:23 PM
4

I mean, the education domain is female dominated (especially in preschool, primary and secondary levels and with regards to teachers and administrators) but the situation is seemingly getting worse in some places.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:13 AM
13

Here is part of the literature. However, do note that mothers are more likely to be primary and sole caregivers of children, and thus have more access to their children. This is probably a significant factor for the abuse disparity.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:56 PM
25

Installing female urinals, discouraging wearing makeup and waiting for friends in women's bathrooms may alleviate the issue.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:37 AM
5

I have to disagree. Rape should be made gender-neutral but I don't believe non-penetrative acts should be included under its purview.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:51 PM
2

what should a prosecutor need to prove in order to find a false accuser guilty? The same standard for every criminal offence, which is beyond a reasonable doubt. The issue is that prosecutors are reluctant to commence charges for cases of alleged false sexual accusation even when compelling evidence are present. Due to prosecutorial discretion, charges are sometimes not made as it 'goes against public interest'.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:39 PM
8

No legal recourse as far as I'm aware.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 06:11 PM
20

The laws being gender-specific makes it infinitely more reprehensible. As far as I'm aware, there is little to no legal recourse for male victims of sexual and domestic violence in India. Our Penal Code (I'm from Singapore) was based on India's but gradual reforms made it much more gender-neutral, although not entirely.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 04:12 PM
19

Acts like whistling, obscene gestures, and sexual overtures against women also fall under the category of crime in the state after the amended act... The aforementioned acts are already covered under s509 of the Penal Code. Do they really have to come up with a superfluous provision that continues to deny female perpetrators and male victims?
/r/MensRights22/08/22 04:00 PM
1

Thanks, great to know. Do you also know if there's any male-specific scholarships in the UK for candidates in female-dominated studies such as nursing and early education education? I heard that female-specific scholarships (such as this) are rather common.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 01:11 PM
24

I have yet to see the reverse for fields over-represented by women.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 05:13 PM
16

Expanded rules prevent sexual assault complainant's past from being used against them How far do these rules extend? Does this mean that if the complainant has been alleged/convicted of other false accusations, this fact cannot be brought up? Conversely, does this safeguard extends to defendants, such that their past cannot be used against them?
/r/MensRights04/08/22 12:49 AM
5

Asking for context’ which I assume is just wanting more information to an accusation Context matters. Fart rape isn't exactly rape.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 06:59 PM
56

They may as well adopt s114A of India's Evidence Act. Presumption as to absence of consent in certain prosecutions for rape- In a prosecution for rape under clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) or clause (d) or clause (e) or clause (g) of sub-section (2) of section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, (45 of 1860), where sexual intercourse by the accused is proved and the question is whether it was without the consent of the woman alleged to have been raped and she states in her evidence before the C…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/22 11:28 AM
24

Here you go
/r/MensRights28/07/22 05:09 PM
24

I don't think you're against a specific gender. I'm merely pointing out that retaining a gender-specific offence like infanticide is utterly ridiculous and discrimitory. It wrongly assumes that only new mothers experience adverse psychological issues (hormonal or otherwise) and hence only grants special leniency to such demographic. Not only that. The UK government also prepared a policy paper to tackle sentence inequality. In particular, it proposed that since women are over-represented in the …
/r/MensRights28/07/22 02:47 PM
45

There is evidence that new fathers experience hormonal changes, namely the decrease in testosterone. Hypotestosteronism is highly correlated with depression. In any case, available literature on paternal PPD is extremely limited. Hopefully, more studies can be conducted on the subject.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 02:06 PM
70

That would be because postpartum depression is exclusive to people who have XX chromosomes. Not true. There are compelling evidence that paternal PPD is very real and rather prevalent.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 01:56 PM
4

I believe that its a completely valid remark.
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/22 10:54 AM
273

It is worth noting that infanticide is a lesser offence compared to murder/manslaughter/culpable homicide. It is also women-specific. This means that fathers who killed their infants whilst suffering from post-partum depression would be charged differently and more severely.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 06:56 AM
4

I mean after the child is born. Although 50/50 should be the starting point, the parents have the liberty to vary care arrangement amongst themselves based on mutual agreement. Any disagreement should be settled in family court and rulings should be based on objective evaluations and not gendered principles and precedents.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 06:17 PM
243

Paternity test should be mandated for such cases. Also, the dad should have 50 - 50 physical custody as the starting point.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 12:53 AM
20

Anyone knows if this is legally considered doxxing or defamation in Toronto?
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:53 AM
11

Not only are men made to look like natural sexual predators, they are made to look like natural sexual 'consenters' too. Consent is a unilateral concept for a large proportion of society.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 04:07 PM
14

Many similar statues across the world include so many exceptions (primarily benefitting women and girls) they're antonymous to what their names suggest.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 06:20 AM
2

if the prosecution can’t convince the jury The accused was already convicted of rape in a lower court. Her conviction was overturned by the supreme court and only on the basis of technicalities (legal definition in this case)
/r/MensRights03/07/22 04:06 PM
6

I'm not from the US so I'm not familiar with its laws on sexual offences, particularly the different provisions across different states. Still, rape in Ohio is defined as any form of unwanted sexual contact obtained without consent and/or obtained through the use of force, threat of force, intimidation, or coercion, which technically includes the mother's act. However, the court ruled that it only amount to gross sexual imposition, which is a lesser offence. Not to mention, under the same defini…
/r/MensRights03/07/22 04:00 PM
6

They know that if they included made to penetrate, the rape stats would go from 99% to 50-50%. This was actually found in the NISVS (last 12 months prevalence). What I'm perplexed about is why the mother in the article I've linked had her rape conviction quashed when made to penetrate scenarios are clearly within Ohio's rape law. Am I looking at the wrong law or something?
/r/MensRights03/07/22 03:50 PM
196

She admitted that she used to drug and rob men to 'make a living'.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 03:38 PM
18

According to here, the elements of rape is as such. Rape is any form of unwanted sexual contact obtained without consent and/or obtained through the use of force, threat of force, intimidation, or coercion. From the above definition, it seems like rape is a gender-neutral offence in Ohio, and includes any sort of sexual contact. However, this contradicts a recent case in Ohio, in which a mother made her 2 year old son sexually penetrate her vagina with a sex toy. She was initially convicted for …
/r/MensRights03/07/22 03:36 PM
428

So many Cardi Bs running around.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 03:04 PM
102

In the UK (and indeed most of the world), women cannot rape another person as the narrow legal definition of rape meant they are generally not legally recognised as possible perpetrators. Still, it is possible for women in the UK to be charged with rape but only as accessories.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/22 02:00 PM
8

As far as I'm aware, only fathers are liable to pay for child maintenance, and only female majors are entitled to child maintenance (unless they marry).
/r/MensRights23/06/22 07:07 AM
-8

Nothing to do with this post. Respectfully disagree. Sexual assault cases are circumstances whereby paper abortion is arguably the most justifiable and palatable to the general population. I believe that's a good place to start.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 04:17 PM
-8

Perhaps start with overthrowing Hermesmann v. Seyer. Women who conceive due to being sexually assaulted should have the same option as well, though they already have that in some jurisdictions (eg. safe haven law in the US).
/r/MensRights15/06/22 03:12 PM
2

You may want to seek legal recourse if things escalate further. Hopefully, your management can do something about it before it reaches that point.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 08:53 AM
1

Did she behaved the same way towards other co-workers? If so, get together and file a police report against her for harassment, criminal intimidation or their equivalences.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 08:44 AM
7

Thanks. I did lots of self-evaluation and had since came to terms with it. Hope everything works out for you eventually.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 09:15 AM
71

Yes, multiple times, and the assaults were downplayed not only by the people around me but by myself as well.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 02:00 AM
1

I see. Thnaks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 06:56 PM
150

Meaning a company board may comprise 100% of women but at most 60% of men?
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:33 PM
27

why shouldnt both sexes be equally represented in all things? Because imposing the same things on every individual is paradoxical to the notion of equal opportunities, not to mention it's virtually impracticable. You can't make sure all individuals have the same life span can you?
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:05 AM
5

The court will seldom accept a voluntary termination of parental rights if an adoption is not already in the works, unless there is some sort of extreme circumstance. This is because the child has a right to support from the parent, instead of being immediately placed into the care of the state. It is noteworthy that voluntary termination is not readily accepted by the court (albeit with good reasons) unless in exceptional circumstances.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 01:58 AM
62

She probably pleasure herself to the SCUM Manifesto.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 05:40 PM
11

Each time a man have sex with a woman, a baby may be born. This goes both ways.
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 02:15 PM
16

My niece tried as a joke. It's certainly possible. Alternatively, female urinal can be installed in the ladies to speed up the process.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 04:18 PM
52

Guess men should be able to use the ladies because of "potty disparity". The reverse is rather prevalent.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:52 PM
9

Is the complainant investigated for perjury or obstructing the course of justice? Also, the wording is terrible. Judge Moleboheng Mdlana-Mayisela, in turning down the man’s R6m claim but awarding R350 000, commented that the purpose was not to enrich the aggrieved party but to offer solatium for his injured feelings. He was wrongfully arrested and incarcerated for rape, of which his family, friends and colleagues were probably in the know. His feelings aren't the only things wounded.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:07 AM
46

Rape is unfortunately a gendered offence in the UK.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/22 02:28 PM
1

Rape does have a requirement for a penis to be involved, but everything else falls under sexual assault which (just like rape) carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The maximum sentence may be similar but their sentencing frameworks differs, with rape having a harsher one. "Causing sexual activity without consent" also does not convey nearly the same opprobrium compared to rape. Still, it's relatively better than many other jurisdictions just like what you've said. Take India for inst…
/r/MensRights28/05/22 07:34 AM
7

Unwanted sexual penetration and being made to penetrate. Wholly agree.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 06:40 PM
4

It doesn’t have to be a penis. Rape is penis-specific under UK's law. Still, it's as you've said, there are many places that do not prescribe such a narrow requirement. It does have to be penetration (in most places). Which is why it’s so difficult to have males be considered victims of rape by females. More specifically, the penetration needs to be done by the perpetrator. Not many places consider a person being forced to penetrate another as rape. In fact, a few countries (e.g. India) don't re…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 05:59 PM
5

Not the penetration itself is important but all the circumstances around it, i.e. the context of the sexual act. Yes, and the severity corresponds with the sentencing bands. it can be rape without penetration (your female rape example) Female rape (a woman forcing a man to penetrate her vagina with his penis) entails penetration too. for example when you consent to sex and your partner suddenly sticks a finger up your butt without asking you first, that's not severe enough for rape imo). Whether…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 05:52 PM
4

Yeah I've seen numerous such petitions and it always ends with the same old generic response from the UK government.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:50 PM
13

Pretending to be someone else is clearly much less severe than physically attacking and forcing someone in a park at night. Yes there is a stark difference, and this is reflected in the corresponding sentencing bands. The former is a category 3 whilst the latter is a category 1. What I'm saying is that unwanted sexual penetration by anything other than a penis, as well as made to penetrate scenarios should all be considered rape rather than being treated as lesser offences by default. Take "caus…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:47 PM
8

And I think this is blatantly unjust.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:31 PM
4

There are certain limitations, and with very good reasons indeed. I'm not really aware of UK's law but in Singapore, these limitations are stipulated under s377CB of the Penal Code. If I'm not mistaken, the UK's equivalent has a broader scope compared to Singapore's.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 03:57 PM
22

As far as i'm aware from the article, the Trans Man had consent, as the article isn't mentioning otherwise. The consent were given on the premise of him being a (biological) man and using his penis and not a prosthetic. It was found by the court that he hid these facts from his partners by performing the acts only in the dark, using clothing to conceal his prosthetic and assaulting them when they asked questions. Under the law, sexual consent as a result of deception is not valid and hence he wa…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 01:32 PM
24

But the Three women are only claiming rape because it was a prosthetic device and not a real penis. Hence my sentiments. Under UK's law, rape is penis-specific. I believe that unwanted sexual penetration by an object (or anything for the matter) should constitute as rape too. The article mentions nothing of the Accused forming himself onto the women. I assume you meant forcing himself? In the UK (and many other jurisdictions), sexual activity is consent based. One does not need to physically for…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 01:07 PM
92

The legal definition of rape should be broadened to include all kinds of unwanted sexual penetration. This perpetrator got away with a lesser offence.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 12:21 PM
9

Child support should be the reasonable expenses of the child x proportion the parent is liable for
/r/MensRights22/05/22 01:29 PM
11

I don't really feel shamed for going to the hospital, but I so think male patient modesty is often sidelined. I went for a cystoscopy a while back, and I requested to my urologist for my examiner and his technician to be men. My request was granted but during the procedure, of which my lower body was exposed, I saw at least two female staff crossing over from the adjacent room into my room via the room connector for reasons I'm unaware of. If the patient is a woman, I don't believe the same woul…
/r/MensRights19/05/22 01:10 AM
16

To be fair and objective, either expand of the scope of this leave and extend it to all employees, or adjust the wages accordingly to the number of hours worked.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 03:26 PM
18

Not only that. It seems like the so called quota applies unilaterally to female board members only. They aren't even trying to mask their blatant discrimination.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 01:04 AM
10

Internalised misandry
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:15 AM
345

Self-inflicted pay gap.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:02 PM
32

Perhaps he should file a complaint against her for sexual assault instead.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:00 PM
1

Thanks for your response.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 05:21 AM
3

Thanks for the reply. As long as mother is able to give informed consent (she is conscious, not totally crazy, etc), she should be the only able to determine what happens to pregnancy. Do you mean termination post birth like not paying child support? No, I do not mean the nonpayment of child support. Example 1 A child is conceived by a married couple via a planned pregnancy. The mother subsequently wants to abort the child as she has fallen in love with another man. The father is against the abo…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 04:59 AM
0

Hi. I would like your perspective on some issues regarding abortion. With the exception of circumstances where the life of the mother is in danger, do you think women should be allowed to abort their children after the period of perviability? Do you think there are any circumstances where men should have legal say with regards to the termination of their children, rather than it being unilaterally decided by the mothers? Do you think men should be allowed to file for paper abortion? If so, do yo…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 04:32 AM
3

If the child is conceived from mutual consensual sex, the father (and the mother) should rightfully be liable to fulfill their parental obligations. That said, the parents can always surrender their child via safe haven law if they wish to be absolved of parental responsibilities.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 01:16 AM
0

In principle, do you think a man should be able to file for a court order to compel the termination of his child if the child is the product of rape or sexual deception perpetrated by the mother?
/r/MensRights06/05/22 04:16 PM
46

Then don't do that to yourself either.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:45 PM
28

Is she willing to get a tubal ligation instead, since it's her suggestion?
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:19 PM
18

Unfortunately, gender-neutral law does not equate to gender-neutral enforcement, prosecutorial discretion and sentencing.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/22 04:09 PM
6

AFAIK, alimony is only gender-neutral for marriages amongst Hindus under the Hindu Marriage Act. Spousal maintenance for civil marriages remains gender-specific under the Special Marriage Act.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 07:39 AM
109

Wtf is gender nonconforming? Does that mean a man should not recognise himself as a man, or vice versa? Who came up with all these brainless terminologies? People shouldn't perpetrate unbecoming behaviours. It has nothing to do with not accepting one's innate identity.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 02:11 AM
228

The ultimate victim blaming.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 02:39 PM
2

It is still an offence to engage in sexual activity with a minor even with the minor's consent. However, the lack of consent is an aggravating factor, and engaging in non-consensual sexual activity a minor is treated more severely compared to the former. Generally, this is reflected in differing sentencing bands or differing laws. AFAIK, this is true for most jurisdictions. Take my country for example, engaging in sexual penetration with a minor 14 years of age and above without the minor's cons…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 07:07 PM
18

It is indeed a massive problem. The Indian government tried multiple times to amend rape laws to be gender-neutral but was met with furious protest by women's groups. Numerous studies actually found rough gender symmetry with regards to both perpetrators and victims of sexual violence. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) of 2010-2012 found that an annual average of 4% of women experienced contact sexual violence and 3.2% of women had non-contact unwanted sexual exper…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 04:49 PM
38

Statutory rape, or rape in general is a gender-specific offence in India. A girl (or woman) cannot be charged with rape or even outrage of modesty (molestation) even if she commits the most grievous of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 04:40 PM
48

During the enquiry, the girl revealed she was in an intimate relationship with the boy and that he was responsible for the pregnancy. After this, the boy was booked under the POCSO Act and produced before a local court. The article did reveal that they were in an intimate relationship, which implies consent to sexual activity. The details are vague so we can't tell for sure. Still, if this case is of any indication, blatantly discriminative discretion is seemingly commonplace with regards to pro…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 04:33 PM
152

https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/chennai/thanjavur-12-year-old-boy-held-under-pocso-for-impregnating-17-year-old-girl-7881746/lite/ Inexplicable how the boy (who is 5 years younger) is arrested and deemed a perpetrator while the girl was recognised as a victim. A gender-neutral POSCO Act is meaningless if it isn't enforced as such.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 12:47 PM
29

Don't forget the The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is as its name suggests. Only women are recognised as possible victims and men as possible perpetrators of domestic violence. This means that there's little to no legal recourse for men who experience domestic violence. AFAIK, there is no commensurate provision for male victims.
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/22 02:21 AM
30

So allowing Men to look and act like Women is your idea of "equality" Allowing all individuals the same liberty is my idea of equality. This includes opportunity for self-expression.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:58 PM
9

Women are different from Men. Fully agree but that's immaterial to the issue at hand. A neutral grooming standard does not mean men and women are the same, nor does it impose that men and women should be the same. It merely means according the same liberty to male personnel, of which they get more choices. Sounds like you want to wipe out all individuality and make everyone an NPC. Quite the opposite. It expands the possibility for self-expression, not constrict it. Most men will probably stick …
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:56 PM
35

I thought Men's rights was to deal with real issues Issues that are arguably less pressing are not any less real. There's no need for monopolisation. This is just nonsense complaining from sone who has no desire to actually join and server but join "for the benefits" and uses his hair as an excuse. Perhaps it's 'nonsense complaining' for you but it isn't for many. As one who've served his two years of full-time NS as a conscript, many of the male personnel are constantly subjected to reprimand/p…
/r/MensRights11/04/22 05:06 AM
92

A double standard that's being taken for granted. It would be objective if grooming standards are prescribed on the basis of functionality but this is not the case for most forces, where female personnel are allowed both short and long hair while male personnel are only allowed short hair regardless of vocation. The same goes for things like nail polish and makeup. There are very few forces that prescribe gender neutral grooming policies, the Royal New Zealand Navy is the only one I know of.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 02:03 AM
9

Is the reserve true too or is it unilateral?
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:17 AM
7

It's appalling how blatant falsehoods can be sprouted with impunity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/22 03:59 AM
149

While 99% of gender-based violence is committed by men Where did she pull this from?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/22 01:20 PM
44

A primary reason may be that mothers generally have much more access to their newborns (and young children) compared to fathers. Anyway this is besides the point. Having PPD, as unfortunate as it may be, does not and should not absolve a parent of his/her responsibility for killing his/her child as a default position.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 01:57 AM
6

What they did may be unbecoming, but there's no reason to be sad if you genuinely don't feel that way. This applies to circumstances involving any gender.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 01:47 AM
95

Postpartum depression affects fathers too.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 01:43 AM
10

Just amend the law to make rape gender-neutral. Just because female perpetrated rape isn't legally and culturally recognised (in Pakistan) doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
/r/AntiFeminists04/04/22 12:43 AM
17

Apparently this is meant to be funny.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 02:40 PM
7

Personally, I would like to see criminal proceedings taken.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 12:45 AM
2

I am new to reddit and yet have seen qn abundance of fellow men argue in favour of forced-birrh. Do you mean anti-abortion or something resembling mandatory childbearing. From my limited experience on Reddit, sentiments for the former is quite prevalent but I have yet to come across the latter.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 12:43 PM
12

I don't get it. What is there to argue? Due to innate biological constraints, only women are capable of bearing children, and only men are capable of fertilising women. Narrow exceptions exist for trans individuals.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 11:25 AM
2

RIP little boy
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:00 AM
41

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/ Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%) of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases.
/r/AntiFeminists21/03/22 01:51 AM
3

Reid said based on the Family Law Section's interpretation of this bill, if one member of a 65-year-old couple didn't work for much of the marriage in favor of being a homemaker and that couple retired and then divorced, the person who was the homemaker wouldn't be entitled to alimony. The section is calling on Gov. Ron DeSantis to veto the bill. That's where matrimonial assets division comes in. The division should be made in a fair manner, taking into account both direct and indirect contribut…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 01:14 AM
11

Terrorists wearing suicide vests be like "WHY U STARE“?
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:35 AM
11

Utter injustice
/r/MensRights15/03/22 02:51 AM
22

Why would I owe you my life for being physically stronger than you? Do physical attractive people owe their bodies to people who are less attractive physically? Do you owe me a living because you're earning more than I do?
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/22 10:47 AM
44

Molly stood firm and said the business was specifically intended to appeal to women, who make up 75 per cent of book buyers. She said: 'I perhaps wouldn't say that the ultimate purpose is to level the playing field. My opinion it's to amplify voices and I think women being the biggest book buyers are the receptors of that. We can see the value in it being a unique, female-only space.' So women require exclusive female-only space for being over-represented? You'll probably never hear the same for…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:09 PM
9

That would be ideal.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 06:58 AM
10

Individuals who want to join voluntarily as career service personnel will be doing it on their own accord. That's different from being compelled to serve, with legal repercussions if one is to refuse or desert, and generally comes with poor stipends and benefits. Anyway, my suggestion is mere food for thought.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 06:58 AM
25

One can also make the argument that forced servitude (which is what conscription is) goes against everything America stood for. My rights and liabilities are relative to yours. As far as I know, men who registered for SS enjoy no additional perks compared to exempted persons, and I believe that is absolutely unacceptable. Do you think that men who register for SS should receive additional benefits/rights? Or do you think exempted persons should have additional liability (eg. additional defence t…
/r/MensRights10/03/22 06:16 AM
16

I believe that ideally, no one should be compelled to serve, and if SS is determined to be necessary by collective consensus, it should be gender-neutral. In the current state, SS (and consequently the draft) is unfortunately male-specific. I am not inclined to agree that a woman should not be president because women are not included in the SS. However, I believe that men who get drafted should be entitled to two votes per individual.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 04:33 AM
1

Speaking only for myself. Women should not have the unbridled right to abortion in any and every circumstances and men should not have the unbridled right to financial abortion in any and every circumstances (if this ever came to be).
/r/MensRights10/03/22 01:23 AM
12

It wouldn't be if there's a commensurate event for boys.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 01:15 AM
33

The fact that he remarked 'less of a man' suggested he holds men to higher standards, however arbitrary and unreasonable they may be.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 02:28 AM
3

I'm honestly fine with low pay. If it's justified and appreciated. Ideally, no one should be subjected to forced service. Nonetheless, if selectively (how one's born being the main factor) compelling someone to serve is deemed to be 'necessary', commensurate measures of compensation should be in place. No money? An extra vote then. The Singaporean society is drowning in its own propaganda. "Every woman is a mother, sister, or boyfriend". Warm comforting words assuring women and foreigners that t…
/r/MensRights04/03/22 04:27 AM
17

Why don't women get the same privilege? Some believe it's because of patriarchy and misogyny. So internalised is this misogyny that despite the vast majority of women being supportive of NS, only 9 percent of them are willing to undergo full-time mandatory conscription.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 03:49 PM
77

In my country where male only conscription is practiced, the government's position is that it's a 'privilege' to serve, and that slavery service cannot be measured in dollars and cents (meaning conscripts get shitty stipends). Still, our government just announced yesterday to enhance benefits for NSFs and NSmen. Regarding your question, I believe that individuals who had completed full-time conscription or volunteered for service for an equivalent duration should be entitled to two votes/pax.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 06:43 AM
26

There was no decree that forced anyone to stay and fight, unlike what's happening in Ukraine.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 06:34 AM
34

One can help him up to the chair, fetch him a drink, show him some concern instead of treating him as if he doesn't exist etc. Assisting him doesn't necessarily involves physical contact with his gonads.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 10:59 AM
52

Another appalling video where a boy accidentally shot himself in his nuts with a party popper and collapsed in pain. His sisters laughed at his agony and not a single adult went over to assist him. Worse still, the video was uploaded by none other than the boy's mother, who seemingly thought it's funny to title the video "2019 balls hit". From the comments, the mother and the sisters thought the entire thing was hilarious.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 10:04 AM
23

Because society believes that men are immodest by default.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 03:07 PM
69

Classic expectation. Playful if it happens to a man, devious if it happens to a woman.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 01:37 PM
69

I do not know who he is but apparently it's not the first time. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2116695/Dermot-gets-groped-woman-X-Factor-auditions.html
/r/MensRights13/02/22 01:09 PM
26

In cases of rape, it's literally guilty until proven innocent. Section 114A in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 1[114A. Presumption as to absence of consent in certain prosecutions for rape.—In a prosecution for rape under clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) or clause (d) or clause (e) or clause (g) of sub-section (2) of section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, (45 of 1860), where sexual intercourse by the accused is proved and the question is whether it was without the consent of the woman alleged…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/22 01:01 PM
3

A couple of years ago, a pal's gf terminated their daughter without his consent because she was seeing another guy. He even agreed to be solely responsible for the child but to no avail.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 02:23 AM
1

Fathers should have legal say with regards to abortion. Also, this is hypothetical but fathers should not be allowed to 'financially abort' unless certain requirements are met.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 06:46 AM
1

Section 498-A: Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty — Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine. Explanation. — For the purposes of this section, “cruelty” means— (a) any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger t…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 04:04 AM
41

To some extent its not only normalised, but glorified and deemed virtuous.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 07:42 PM
18

What's the extent of access granted? Chances are it's nowhere near 50/50.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 09:48 PM
9

Section 498-A: Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty — Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine. Explanation. — For the purposes of this section, “cruelty” means— (a) any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger t…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 08:13 PM
10

That's unfortunate.
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/22 02:19 PM
14

The trial is still ongoing... I don't know what you mean. She was fully acquitted of all charges. Men have more rights tf, rape culture caters towards men in most countries far more than women, where'd you get that idea from? Manifestly wrong. Look at the relevant legislations in most countries. Chances are, the laws and public polices pertaining to sexual violence are gender-specific, some more extreme than others. Take India for instance, where virtually all sexual offences concerning adults a…
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/22 02:06 PM
20

Similar cases such as this are perpetrated by women against boys too. In fact, gender-specific sexual offences are the norm in many countries. Men/boys actually have less rights and protections in this regard.
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/22 12:55 PM
-4

Not all women or not all anything are just as applicable, in just about any context. It's a pretty meaningless phrase.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:49 AM
6

I wonder if their musical repertoire comprises of only female composers.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 10:52 AM
4

she states in her evidence before the Court that she did not consent, the Court shall presume that she did not consent. TIL. Essentially, the burden of proof lies on the defendant, and he is presumed to be guilty until proven innocent.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 04:01 PM
17

Sadly it's nothing new. Girls are deemed to be more vulnerable by default. In almost all jurisdictions, rehabilitation is more likely to the primary sentencing principle for females while retribution and deterrence are more likely to be the primary sentencing principles for males.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 03:12 PM
9

There are a few issues that need to be evaluated. Firstly, it concerns the notions of marriage and conjugal duties. Should sex be a form of default duty, to be expected by virtue of entering a voluntary contract that is marriage? Should sex even be deemed as an essential element in a marriage? Personally, I don't believe that it should be. However, legally and socioculturally, sex is embedded in the context of marriage, even if marital rape is stripped of its immunity. For example, consummation …
/r/MensRights22/01/22 10:44 AM
109

Sadly, male modesty has always been secondary.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 04:59 PM
29

My stand is that there should be no default position with regards to gender, and each case should be evaluated as objectively as reasonably practicable.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 02:11 PM
45

My bad
/r/MensRights21/01/22 02:00 PM
430

Sophie Francis-Cansfield, of Women’s Aid, said: “One woman is murdered by a man every three days in the UK. Priority must be given to ensuring women’s safety.” Blatantly ignoring the fact that men are almost 3 times more likely to be victims of homicide.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 01:43 PM
9

In my country, it is possible to convict a person solely on the testimony of a sole witness (the alleged victim) if the testimony is 'unusually convincing'.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 07:22 PM
24

Bain argues that ordinary people believe in ‘rape myths’. These are false assumptions people supposedly hold about the nature of rape, such as that people are only ever raped by strangers, or that rape necessarily causes bodily injury. Or that only men can perpetrate rape. Oh wait that's not a myth it's the law...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/22 01:29 AM
2

Sadly, sexual harassment (insult of modesty) is a gendered crime in India so there's no possibility of legal recourse for male victims.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 01:59 AM
5

Thanks for the info. Yes made to penetrate (including by fingers and objects) should rightly falls under the definition of rape. I also think that forced penetration of the urethra should also be included under its purview.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/22 02:24 PM
9

Anyone knows if the NISVS figures include attempted but unsuccessful made to penetrate cases? For rape figures, both attempted and completed cases are taken into account.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/22 12:40 PM
5

I'm not really familiar with the situation in the US (all articles are from the US) but in Singapore, mothers are indeed favoured by the family courts with regards to Care & Control (physical custody), especially if the children are young. This is largely because of an unofficial tender years doctrine. With everything being equal, CC is generally awarded to the mothers. According to the family courts of Singapore, the maternal bond is an important factor, and typically outweighs paternal bond in…
/r/MensRights06/01/22 06:40 AM
8

Largely depends on circumstances.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 05:13 PM
0

Like I said he can opt out. Actually he can't. In most, if not all jurisdictions, a father is liable for child support even if conception occurred as a result of a criminal act committed by the woman. See Hermesmann v. Seyer for instance.
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/22 07:07 AM
1

Not sure what you meant by hypotheticals. Do you think lying about contraception should constitute an offence? If so, do you think it should be specific or neutral gender wise? Speaking of abortion, do you think a father (who was a victim of sexual deception perpetrated by his child's mother) should be accorded legal say with regards to the termination of his child? Should he have the right to be absolved of parental obligations if the offence is substantiated? Should he have the right to contes…
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/22 05:38 AM
5

Do you hold the same view for the converse? If a woman consented to having unprotected sex with a man on the pretext of a lie (the man lied that he had a vasectomy) and becomes pregnant as a result, do you think it's unreasonable for the woman to seek recourse?
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/22 01:35 AM
13

Traditional gendered expectations also demand fathers to be the sole/main providers and sacrifice precious time with their children. All parents deserve better.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/21 04:07 AM
0

A non-conviction does not necessarily means that a defendant is factually innocent. It merely means that there isn't enough evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Conversely, and to a much smaller extent (hopefully so), a conviction does not necessarily means that a defendant is factually guilty. Wrongful convictions aren't that uncommon, and securing acquittal is enormously challenging.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/21 04:19 AM
4

The sociological notion of 'face' is extremely significant in Asian societies, especially when for public events involving relatives, friends, bosses and associates.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/12/21 01:07 PM
15

He continued: 'These false allegations of rape, false allegations which will inevitably be widely publicised, are likely to have the perverse impact of increasing the likelihood of guilty men going free. 'Cases such as this bring a real risk that a woman who has been raped or sexually assaulted may not complain to the police for fear of not being believed.' Because only men are perpetrators and only women are victims. Also, the harms and implications caused to the falsely accused are apparently …
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/21 04:27 PM
22

You declined to give a statement, with her lawyer saying she was "very distraught", according to the Boston Herald website. Apparently, for not being able to profit from her offence. The fact that she's not liable for any custodial sentence is infuriating.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 12:53 AM
2

In the UK, rape is explicitly penis-specific. Using a strap-on constitutes an offence under section 2 (assault by penetration) and not section 1 (rape). The woman in question was convicted of rape by abetment and not as a first person, since the latter is legally impossible.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 08:15 PM
2

I believe she was convicted of rape as an accessory, for abetting rape. Under UK's law, women cannot be prosecuted for rape in the first person.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 08:10 PM
2

It affects males as well but men are ignored. It's as if the notions of dignity, modesty and safety do not apply for men and boys.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 02:06 PM
4

Personally, I don't find anything wrong with it, as long as there is consistency and alignment. (eg. not using females (as a noun) and men in the same sentence)
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/21 04:49 PM
42

The internalised misandry is strong in the comment section.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 05:10 PM
10

The majority of rape/sexual assault cases involve little to no physical aggression.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 07:00 PM
65

Judge Vasta’s barrister, Jeremy Kirk SC, told the court he was only “a human being” So was Luis Garavito.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 02:12 PM
1

16 is the AOC in the UK.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/21 03:06 PM
55

Ironically, if the roles are swapped, the husband is a "LVM".
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/21 08:44 AM
163

She was cleared. There's no repercussion for her.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/21 02:52 AM
35

Essentially a five year sentence if parole is granted. A blatantly inadequate sentence that doesn't commensurate with the severity of her actions at all.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/21 03:40 PM
0

There's no right or wrong answer. It depends on the context of different families and desires of different individuals. For my case, I'm the primary provider for our family and my partner is the primary caregiver of our two children. Importantly, such arrangements must be made mutually and both partners should be ready to accommodate reasonable changes to suit any changing needs. This applies in a gender-neutral fashion.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 06:29 AM
3

By this appalling logic, "all women" is just as true.
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/21 11:45 PM
103

Article title: Female caregiver handed life sentence for rape of mentally challenged man Article: Mawela assured the public that the SAPS in Gauteng is determined and dedicated to fighting crimes committed against women and children. Even in such a case, they just can't acknowledge that men can be, and do get raped/sexually assaulted. Rape/sexual assault of adult males by female perpetrators is the least reported and most inconvenient variant of sexual violence. By the looks of it, they wish to …
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/21 11:00 PM
13

If the best interests of the child is the paramount principle, is it reasonable for a mother to unilaterally terminate the pregnancy without the consent of the father, regardless of reasons, even if the father is able and willing to support the child by himself? If voluntary parenthood is the paramount principle, is reasonable for a man to be subjected to mandatory parental obligations if he does not wish to be a parent? Is it reasonable to subject him to such obligations even if his child is th…
/r/MensRights27/11/21 02:14 PM
30

All nerve endings are equal but some are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 05:35 AM
54

Incompetent little shit. Everyone knows ChrisFix blinker fluid is the best.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/21 11:02 AM
2

Not in any way knowledgeable in this but sociocultural conditioning and expectations aside, men may be, on average, biologically less inclined to express emotions outwardly, particularly manifestations of emotion that suggest weakness, vulnerability and incompetence. (please correct me if I'm wrong) I don't like the idea (specifically how it's put across) that men (and boys) should cry, or they should be encouraged to cry. Nobody should be actively encouraged to cry. Rather, we should tell indiv…
/r/MensRights24/11/21 09:44 AM
129

She didn't have her card or even her phone? Smells like an engineered tale.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 01:09 PM
5

up to $750,000 That's the upper limit, and he most likely not getting that.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 11:53 PM
11

I guess I remembered wrongly. However, there is prejudice against males with regards to the implementation of Title IX. The Women's Sports Foundation says that, under Title IX, boys should only be allowed to try out for girls teams when "there is no team for boys offered in that sport, boys are underrepresented with regard to total athletic opportunities and the strength and skill levels of the boys are comparable to those of the girls." The foundation continues: "Boys cannot participate on girl…
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:54 PM
18

IIRC, it's because Title IX explicitly allows positive discriminations for "historically disadvantaged groups". What "historically disadvantaged" entails and how selective it is are anyone's guesses.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 04:38 PM
7

Better make sure that their school fees are relatively proportional to the amount of goods and service rendered.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 04:32 PM
2

I mean, castration turns them on. Enough said.
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/21 10:40 PM
1

Much appreciated. Thanks.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 06:02 PM
3

Legally, both can't consent. Nonetheless, prosecutorial and judicial double standards are evidently rampant. One couldn't be convicted if they weren't charged in the first place. This prejudice is seemingly even more prevalent in the kangaroo courts of campuses.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 07:20 PM
22

Where's the Navy Seals when you need them?
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/21 06:48 PM
-2

Technically yes. But as far as I'm aware, no one's gonna get charged unless one party alleged that the other is not adequately intoxicated. It's like two minors having consensual sex with each other. Technically, both have committed an offence, but by virtue of prosecutorial discretion, charges are seldom pressed.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:23 PM
-22

Unfortunately, you'll have to live with this then, including being a parent for your child. Determine the reasonable expenses of your child and have it split proportionally with regards to the difference in earnings. I'm not sure about your plans going forward. Still, if you are planning to be an involved father, it is wise to secure some kind of custody or access arrangement. Please seek legal advice asap. Edit: First and foremost, insist on a paternity test.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 05:51 PM
22

A drunk person cannot consent. Was she drunk too? Any witnesses? If she was not drunk and took advantage of the situation it's rape.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 05:23 PM
14

Mr O'Halloran told the tribunal: 'I'm merely saying that [it was] someone who is a larger person, Mr King, versus a smaller person... Store manager Lee Murphy claimed he did not think Ms Francis was 'threatening at all'. That's like not investigating a sexual abuse complaint because the alleged perpetrator doesn't look "rapey". 'Ms Francis was in a vulnerable position... [It is] reasonable to assume that someone wouldn't want to put herself in harm's way.' We have priuses playing the breaking ga…
/r/MensRights09/11/21 11:39 PM
28

Don't disrespect actual heroes, people who have given their lives to protect you because of the actions of one person. That's asinine and reeks of privilege. I served my two years of full-time national service (male conscription is mandatory in my country) and continues to serve annual reservists and manning. "Noxious" refers to the toxic culture typically exhibited in armed forces and other uniformed groups. We call it "tekan" culture over here. It is this culture that led to so many unnecessar…
/r/MensRights09/11/21 06:16 PM
54

Noxious culture typical of armed forces. 'If she was in a bad mood she would punch us. She did punch me on one occasion... just a quick jab to my stomach. I didn't have any warning but I had seen it happen to other people so I was expecting it, and she didn't hit me as hard as she hit the males.' Unfortunately expected.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 05:37 PM
5

Know that (and live as if) the notion and necessity of giving consent applies equally to everyone, not just women. Seems easy on the surface but many men, including male victims of SA and my previous self, have trouble with this. Know that the physical state one is in does not equates to or implies consent. Having a hard on ≠ consent. Ejaculation from being sexually assaulted ≠ consent. Unfortunately, aside from general society, many male victims of SA who exhibited these characteristics are not…
/r/MensRights09/11/21 02:48 PM
10

But I can’t help but wonder what if it was a woman who groped someone. The victim hero will be lauded. Laughter and joy would accompany him.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 10:08 AM
5

One man two votes seems to be a fair deal.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 11:45 PM
3

I see. Didn't expect it to be the physics department where male lecturers are generally over represented. I'm presuming it's the humanities, arts or life sciences instead.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 05:51 PM
20

May I know the name of the institution that your friend's working in, as well as the program/field of study? Is the preference explicitly stated in the hiring policy like the one OP shared? Thanks.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 03:32 PM
15

And if one shows them a used condom they would think that's insulting to their dignity.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen04/11/21 03:03 PM
117

Duluth model is working as intended.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 02:51 PM
2

Hence the irony.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 01:41 AM
5

women cannot be charged for rape because she is not seen as an equal An equal? They are seen as superiors and want to keep it that way. The Indian government has on multiple occasions proposed to render rape law gender-neutral. Every single time, women's groups in India have protested vehemently against it. They have also protested the amendment to make child rape laws gender-neutral, and were disappointed when it went through. or as a possible threat. Not really, especially considering the late…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen04/11/21 01:41 AM
21

The UK government is proposing to "enhance sentence equality". It proposed that since women are more likely to kill their own children, they are "disproportionately affected" and hence they should receive a downgraded sentence of infanticide or manslaughter instead. Bear in mind that this consideration is only applicable for female offenders. Male offenders do not have the same leniency. "There is a possibility that the policy may disproportionately affect female offenders as women are more like…
/r/AntiFeminists03/11/21 03:08 PM
25

As usual, no examination of the other side. It's interesting how they brought up India, where women can legally rape men regardless of marital status or any other circumstances. The same is true for domestic violence. The Domestic Violence Act of India does not recognise women as possible perpetrators and men as possible victims. Let's not also mention alimony and monetary compensation for injuries caused by acid attacks, of which only women are eligible for.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen03/11/21 03:04 PM
33

Generally, they are indeed held to different standards.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 05:38 AM
20

Somehow it's caused by the patriarchy and misogyny.
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/21 06:05 PM
31

Exposing yourself to more bestiality can gradually rid you of your nasty anthropocentric tendencies.
/r/AntiFeminists16/10/21 02:42 AM
9

Childbearing is a personal choice while registration for Selective Service is a legal requirement. They are not comparable at all.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 03:34 AM
4

I wouldn't like this to happen to anyone regardless of their gender. Still, it seems like such things happen a lot more when the genders are swapped. In fact, a recent study found that 23 - 33% of women had engaged in a foodie call, where despite a lack of romantic attraction to a suitor, chooses to go on a date to receive a free meal.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:03 PM
7

Nothing is universal. There are women who took on the dual roles of breadwinner and caregiver, same for men. Their spouses/partners may be incapacitated, going through a rough phase, downright deadbeat etc but that's besides the point. The point is with regards to this arbitrary notion of "unpaid labour", its flawed methodology of evaluation and the narratives it's seemingly pursuing.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 11:28 AM
3

I think 'security guard' is one that gets completely forgotten. Who's going to investigate noises in the night, or deal with a crazy person at the door? I think this really depends on where one lives. It could be totally significant in some countries/areas to virtually irrelevant in others. Another one that is forgotten is 'driver'. When both spouses are in the car, who drives? Already included in my original comment.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 10:42 AM
29

Depends on what one's looking for. It has an awful lot of gender-specific laws though. Male-only conscription, male-only corporal punishment, gendered rape laws and so on.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 07:59 AM
68

For jurisdictions like Singapore, only wives are eligible to seek spousal maintenance/alimony, regardless of earning/asset/contribution disparity. This means that even if one is a househusband (with zero income) who sacrificed his career for his household, he is still not eligible for alimony as it is strictly gendered, no matter the income of his wife. However, do note that a 2016 policy amendment made it possible for incapacitated husbands to file for alimony. To be eligible, one must be medic…
/r/MensRights13/10/21 06:41 AM
168

Time spent on such work does not measure productivity. Waiting 2 hours for the chicken to thaw does not really demonstrate 2 hours of "unpaid labour". Similarly, the time one spend with their children does not necessarily equate to meaningful caregiving. Tasks performed predominantly by men (home repair, landscape maintenance, driving etc) are often omitted from such studies. "Unpaid labour" isn't really unpaid in practice. Division of functions within a household is natural and dynamic. The par…
/r/MensRights13/10/21 04:50 AM
30

Two pending bills in the Florida legislature would give DuBoise $1.85 million for the years spent in prison. A similar bill filed earlier this year did not reach a vote. $1.85 million is not nearly adequate. Perhaps $185 million and a statue in Times Square would suffice.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 11:47 AM
2

Good for you for not holding resentment.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 11:33 AM
2

I'm sorry about that. There is no "correct" reaction. However you reacted (or not reacted) does not change the fact that what they did to you was reprehensible.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 11:28 AM
3

An unsolicited squeeze most definitely constitutes sexual assault.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 10:52 AM
101

With such broad definitions, I'm actually astonished it's not 100% of everyone.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 01:53 PM
3

It's dedicated for both alleged and convicted female offenders. Just like r/femalesexpredatornews.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 09:45 AM
5

Maybe she's a part of this and doesn't really like her preys fighting back.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 01:17 AM
35

Husband: "What can you bring to the table"? Wife: "Myself"?
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 07:41 AM
10

Internalised misandry
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:07 AM
1

Yes. I'm well aware of the fact that "made to penetrate" is statistically and academically defined as a separate category. That's exactly what I'm explaining in my earlier comment. I don't know much about the prevalence of male sexual victimisation in juvenile facilities. However, I remember reading a US study which found that in adult facilities, sexual assault among inmates is more prevalent for women than men. This means that at least from that study, there are both more female victims and fe…
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:58 AM
3

I understand. There is no "correct" response to sexual violence, or any forms of victimisation for the matter. How you feel and what you do is entirely up to you. Whether one decides to report, confront, forgive etc is their call. Nonetheless, as someone who had experienced sexual assault by a female coworker, it took me a few long years to sort out my thoughts and emotions. As with many male victims of sexual abuse, it is socially expected that males are "lucky" to receive any sexual attention …
/r/MensRights03/10/21 06:02 AM
2

I'm very sorry for that. Indeed, trauma (or the extent of it) is not a prerequisite for rape/sexual assault, the lack of voluntary consent is. Also, getting hard is not synonymous with consenting, so are getting wet, engorged, not resisting etc. Don't beat yourself up for it.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 03:35 AM
5

They also don't fart.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 11:45 AM
4

You're most welcome.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 06:18 PM
5

Kinda hard to ignore the "nearly 1 in 5 women and 1 in 71 men in the U.S. have been raped at some time in their lives" statistic right next to the table. As stated before, the act of women having non-consensual intercourse with men is defined as "made to penetrate" and not rape. This means that by CDC's definition, rape is largely a gender-specific act/offence. You can refer to the TIME article for more elaboration. There is compelling evidence that at least 1 in 6 men have been sexually abused …
/r/MensRights01/10/21 05:13 PM
6

From the exact same sources that study and report on the prevalence of female sexual victimisation. Notable literature includes the CDC's National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Surveys. It's just that more often than not, people have the despicable tendency to monopolise injustice and victimhood. The NISVS has continuously indicated rough gender parity with regards to both victimisation and perpetration of non-consensual sexual intercourse in the last 12 months of the studies. NISVS 2010 …
/r/MensRights01/10/21 02:37 PM
23

Thanks! Ideally, it can include the fact that around 50% of all victims of unwanted sexual penetration are men.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 08:07 PM
14

I sort of understand their point, wanting to protect women (because women can have babies) . . . Having babies is not an appropriate counterpart to conscription. The former is not a legal requirement while the latter is, and thank goodness for that. It's almost as if the people (typically women) who bring up having offsprings as an equivalent to conscription think it's reasonable to mandate childbearing.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 04:59 PM
24

Is the "lady" charged with attempted rape?
/r/MensRights25/09/21 02:05 AM
10

The other sex should not be allowed to compete in an explicitly gendered event or for an explicitly gendered title. However, if it's neither of those, individuals of any sex should be allowed to participate on their own accord.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 01:05 AM
26

Whaling is illegal anyway
/r/AntiFeminists15/09/21 01:37 PM
21

Elizabeth II was accused of being a lizard and she became the longest reigning British monarch. Keyphrase: accused of
/r/MensRights13/09/21 11:01 AM
61

We should request same for male models and male porn stars. No way that's simply too equal.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 01:17 AM
50

It's only discrimination based on sex if her request was granted to a male colleague but not to her. Apparently this was not the case. This is not even mentioning the fact that British fathers are accorded lesser statutory parental leave by default, and are legally discriminated against.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 04:48 PM
60

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act is exactly what it sounds like. Men are not legally recognised as possible victims.
/r/PussyPass04/09/21 05:50 AM
0

Based on whose terms? If two people mutually made the informed decision to conceive a child, none of them should be allowed to absolve their responsibility whimsically. However, I fully agree that exceptions should be made available, such as when continuing the pregnancy is dangerous for the mother. In family law, the primary consideration is of the child's well-being. It is, in my opinion, totally absurd that this principle does not apply to unborn children.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 06:35 AM
0

And that includes the fundamental right to live for unborn individuals.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 06:06 AM
3

Cheapened terms like "misogyny" and "objectification" will absolutely fly.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 05:40 AM
3

Have a look at this ad. A definitive no no had it been the other way round.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:52 AM
14

If one finishes but was expected or made to carry on, it is almost a given that he no longer feels comfortable to continue. Generally, one will experience a refractory period, which makes sustaining an erection virtually impossible. As a matter of principle, consent can be withdrawn at any time for any reason. At least that's what they tell the ladies. Therefore, the same principle must be abided to, no matter the gender or circumstance.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:42 PM
6

Essentially, offences perpetrated largely by women should have their default sentences lightened, but explicitly only for female offenders. How chivalrous indeed.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 02:16 PM
33

Thanks for pointing that out.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 10:05 AM
159

The mere fact that the girl was referred to as the victim and her brother the accused speaks volume. She later pressured her brother to have sex with her without her consent Such logic...
/r/MensRights28/08/21 09:17 AM
0

It's kinda ridiculous the rights and bodily anatomy of unborn children were not even mentioned, despite them bearing the ultimate implication of abortion.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 12:15 PM
28

Examining only hours spent is stupidly meaningless. It does not measure or demonstrate productivity. I could be thawing the frozen chicken for 2 hours while lying on the couch and on paper I have performed 2 hours of unpaid labour.
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/21 12:41 PM
61

A woman is innocent until even when proven guilty.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/21 07:48 PM
4

The prosecutor will be singing a much different tune if he's the one on the receiving end.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 07:26 PM
2

I'm using 'guy' here in a gender-neutral fashion, same with 'feminists'.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 11:40 AM
16

But the moment some guys start advocating for anything constructive these purported feminists shriek and wail. I don't give a hoot about them not caring about men's rights. It's their care for depriving men equal rights and protection that I'm concerned about. Of course I'm not speaking about all feminists, or self-proclaimed feminists. Feminism is a broad notion with different sects and interpretations.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 07:10 PM
12

The body autonomy and modesty of males have always been sidelined.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 02:06 PM
32

But when the reverse happens the man is just lucky. /s
/r/MensRights06/08/21 12:25 PM
24

Thanks. I'm actually referring to another one where the provost explicitly stated that it is the man's responsibility to seek sexual consent. I believe it is an except of an interview or something, can't remember.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:13 AM
182

A college provost said something like the following. "If both parties are intoxicated, it is the man's responsibility to seek consent". Note that this isn't just some random remark but literally part of the the school's sexual violence policy. Someone made a post on this quite a while ago but now I can't find it. Anyone has the link?
/r/MensRights06/08/21 05:36 AM
30

It is sexist. But remember that girls can join the Boy's Scout but the reverse is not true.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen03/08/21 07:35 PM
57

But gender-neutral conscription is too equal.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 09:55 AM
50

Something the Equality Act doesn't give a shit about.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 01:53 PM
32

Legal protection for killing one's young infant is gender-specific. A father in similar circumstance will be getting a very different deal. The hypocrisy of having an 'Equality Act'.
/r/PussyPass26/07/21 05:17 PM
102

'Internalised misandry'
/r/MensRights25/07/21 06:05 PM
16

Uniformity, hygiene, occupational safety, operational functionality, equal liberty...
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/21 03:36 AM
174

The hair policy should also be gender-neutral. Either allow male personnel to keep long hair or number 1 for all.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/21 01:13 AM
36

'Those embryos are half genetically ours,' Jess told Daily Mail Australia. But it's suddenly misogynistic when fathers employ the same reasoning for their unborn children.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 01:02 AM
47

Is this how they use tax-exempted products?
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/21 03:37 AM
20

Shouldn't regulate a man's wallet too. Financial abortion ftw!
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/21 06:06 PM
5

Men experience greater sexual impulses, not weaker self control. Therefore cheat-shaming is a gendered issue and men should not be blamed for cheating. It's a 'genetic default'.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/21 01:39 PM
33

Aren't you being rather non-inclusive?
/r/MensRights12/07/21 09:03 AM
147

Boys are painting each others' fingernails red and pink in school time as part of 'wellness' workshops aimed at reducing 'toxic masculinity'. They should screen one another for cervical cancer to redefine masculinity.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 04:15 AM
10

That's like saying "I agreed to the boxing match but not the bruises."
/r/MensRights08/07/21 03:27 AM
26

Why isn't the woman named?
/r/MensRights04/07/21 01:26 PM
54

Gianpaolo Damiani, defending all three, invited magistrates to read pre-sentence reports and said: “The three of them need some intervention from probation regarding their thinking skills. “The comments were made out of frustration; they fully accept their responsibility.” Magistrates told Ms Bourne she had set out to cause her victim as much emotional harm as possible and had shown little or no remorse. Both remaining defendants had shown some remorse, said magistrates. Fully accept their respo…
/r/PussyPass30/06/21 06:21 PM
6

I mean, not at all trivialising female DV victims. DV is horrendous, no matter who the victims and perpetrators are. Still, it is glaringly obvious that it's not merely a social phenomenon but an institutional endeavour when it comes to sustaining that pervasive narrative.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 06:09 AM
56

No parliamentary outrage? Where is the outcry for curfew?
/r/MensRights30/06/21 03:31 AM
3

Masculism is also for women.
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/21 01:44 AM
7

I'm sorry about your experience. This is technically sexual assault/molestation. Unfortunately I don't believe there's any recourse for you since it will most probably be dismissed as frivolous.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 04:55 PM
16

Is the same true for school employees?
/r/MensRights24/06/21 05:31 AM
5

While it is certainly true that males are less likely to come forward, sexual violence is generally under-reported regardless of gender. Imagine then saying that women and girls aren't coming forward because of toxic femininity.
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/21 04:19 AM
22

Mr Edwards should be awarded sole custody of his child, lest this smiling lady murder the kid when she crave her own milk.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 11:55 AM
22

A black female cleaner earns 7382738% more than Ping-Pong the otter.
/r/AntiFeminists18/06/21 05:29 PM
60

Change "men" to "women" and "feminist" to "masculinist" and all of the sudden it's misogynistic.
/r/AntiFeminists18/06/21 01:42 PM
11

The hypocrisy of such institutional feminism knows no bounds.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 01:58 PM
21

"Feminism is life affirming. Women and children suffer disproportionately through war around the globe. One's equality shouldn't be based on acquiescence, submission to the military." Can't suffer if one's dead.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 12:37 PM
39

On a side note, take a read at this empowering article. Few things are as pleasurable and enlightening as defecating in the face of a victim. Don't ever forget to flick at half the world's population while one's at it because why the hell not?
/r/MensRights22/05/21 04:08 AM
-3

Could very well be the case. Rosie was not arrested until later that day after Christian made a formal statement. Still, to arrest her without investigating her claim is reprehensible, especially since she's the initial complainant.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 02:12 AM
12

Reverse Duluth Model? Not agreeing with the police's approach in the slightest but the reverse happens too, and much more prevalently.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 01:45 AM
46

The husband supposed to be the provider Conversely, the wife is "supposed" to bend over on the whim of the husband. Matters on abortion are also "supposed" to rest solely upon the husband's decision.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 09:58 AM
18

Reproduction rights
/r/MensRights14/05/21 03:49 PM
3

Alexus Orianna Harris, 25, was charged with simple assault, WRAL reports Matthew James-Stark Artero, 47, was charged with assault on a female and damage to personal property; Both were cited and released with a court date Apparently escalated charges and more severe repercussions are warranted for the guy simply because the one who initiated the fight is a woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/21 11:06 AM
1

I will say its repulsive. An attempt to highlight the ever diluting definition of sexual violence.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 09:39 AM
37

I was squeezed through my mother's vagina without consent. Is this sexual violence?
/r/MensRights02/05/21 03:26 AM
5

It is stated in the article that CRUK prioritised female cancers. it was clearly focused on women’s cancers, specifically breast cancer. and it continues to massively neglect male cancers, particularly prostate cancer, to this day. Note that it's what the article says. I'm not able to verify its truthfulness. Be that as it may, it is largely true that cancers that are female specific or predominantly affects women are generally given more attention and resources. For instance, breast and prostat…
/r/MensRights22/04/21 04:15 PM
29

In a bid to boost funds, organiser Cancer Research UK is inviting men, as well as women and children to take part in the five kilometre or ten kilometre run, or the Pretty Muddy event. Boosting funds is the primary motivation for including men and boys, and apparently the bulk of the funds goes towards women's cancer anyway.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 06:43 AM
12

In other words, demanding more fundings that go into dubious programs and line the pockets of dubious individuals.
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/21 07:33 PM
17

Triage nurses should be paid the same as brain surgeons.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 01:21 PM
240

The inquest heard the couple started to experience difficulties in their marriage and on one occasion Rfn Matthews overslept because he had been drinking and playing video games and missed taking his daughter to school. This led to his wife asking him to leave the marital home. I would imagine being chased out of his home for failing once to take his daughter to school contributed partly to his downward spiral.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 04:37 PM
137

I protect and educate all my children.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 04:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter