TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Late_For_Username Archive

View 0 posts and 114 comments by Late_For_Username on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I knew a woman who accused her husband of being gay because he had trouble getting erections.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/25 01:36 AM
4

He's funny, he's charismatic and he's wealthy. Also, according to the podcast, he's pretty attentive to her. These are very attractive features for a male. She's just being honest. Women are attracted to different things in men then men are in women.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/20 01:27 PM
1

I've heard that studies have shown a negative correlation between aids contraction and circumcision.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 05:24 PM
2

all of them were addicted to something I've heard no-one does SW without having an addiction first.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/12/19 07:52 AM
1

Really? Gender relations in the past resembled Feminist fantasies?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/12/19 07:48 AM
3

That sounds like insecurity talking. You should have checked to see if her personal needs were different from her professional needs (stimulation, conversation).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/12/19 07:46 AM
-1

https://i.redd.it/ohfkr4ijoo601.jpg More serious symptoms
/r/MensRights29/03/19 10:49 AM
1

I'm left-wing. ​ A lot of posters here are left-wing.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:54 AM
2

I'd like to present a different argument. These are rarely accepted in circumcision discussions.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 01:41 AM
1

According to the law? Definitely not (if you're an older male the 14 year old is a female that is). In reality? Maybe there are a handful of 14 year olds who are mature enough to make their own decisions.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 11:39 AM
-4

The idea that it's OK to feel x emotion only in certain circumstances is called emotional invalidation SJWs reading this would blush. Sometimes you need to have your feelings heard and acknowledged, sometimes you need to realise that the world doesn't revolve around how you feel.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 01:35 AM
-7

There are immature reasons for an individual to feel anger.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 01:12 AM
-9

Anger is not a sign of immaturity. It sometimes is.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 12:57 AM
3

Are you sure that's the reason?
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:30 PM
4

Look at your post. You've got problems. Seek help.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:30 PM
2

No. The foreskins would have been removed whether or not the women wanted to rub them on their faces.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:28 PM
2

I'm a straight male. Why would I watch the Oscars?
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:32 AM
2

What the fuck are you on about? The author said some MRAs go too far, you said all MRAs haven't gone far enough. I said that "some" and "all" were two different things. What's the troll?
/r/MensRights02/03/18 12:59 PM
0

"Do some (perhaps many) MRAs go too far?: WHAT? No, MRAs haen't gone far enough. He's talking about small parts of the MRA movement. You're talking about the entire movement.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 01:56 AM
0

Loose skin?
/r/MensRights23/02/18 02:04 PM
1

First of all it isn't, not always, though many laymen seem to think it is. Who taught you about science?
/r/MensRights23/02/18 03:49 AM
1

Political organisation has political view on gender. Imagine my surprise.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 03:41 AM
0

Let's look at all those people in Europe, South America, and Asia that have no difficulty washing themselves. And consider how Europeans have the reputation as the world's best lovers. I've never come into contact with penises that aren't my own. I'm only going by what I've heard from a small sample of Australian women. A family member, a foster mother to an infant and a nurse. I'm concerned about body autonomy, I'm concerned about the pain and suffering of babies, but I'm also concerned about h…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 03:40 AM
-1

Well you're the one comparing it to an unrelated case of maggots, which is hilarious. Well, no. Someone else posted the image. As for hygiene, seriously just wash yourself. It doesn't seem that simple. It might be that some people just don't wash, but I've heard others say that no amount of washing gets rid of the smell. All I've heard is anecdotes from females though. However, they're the ones who get up and personal with penises the most, so I think their opinions should be heard. If you're lo…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 07:24 PM
0

So there's no room for discussion? You know everything you need about the topic and don't need to understand anything more?
/r/MensRights20/02/18 06:00 PM
-2

But there is never any mention of the sometimes massive differences in hygiene when comparing a circumcised penis to an uncircumcised one. For example, a disgusting webm thread on 4chan had a webm of a guy with maggots eating the flesh off his skull, and the next webm was of a porn webm of a porn actress pulling back the foreskin of an actor to reveal clumps of smegma underneath (dick cheese). That's how disgusted many people are at the idea of poor penis hygiene, that we'll compare it too maggo…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 04:59 PM
-8

Okay now don't attack me You're right to feel uncomfortable. Intactivists go off on anyone who dares question them. I first came to a circumcision thread ready for a genuine discussion, but found such places to be a den misinformation, extreme hypersensitivity and sometimes downright lies.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:16 AM
0

I'm a fan of fixed machines, and there appears to be a good amount of equipment in Planet Fitness.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 06:00 AM
3

Can we get a better source than $1 Molyneux?
/r/MensRights18/02/18 05:56 AM
-7

Actually, there might be a few benefits to circumcision. I'd like to discuss the issue, but guys in here won't accept any different points of view.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 09:30 AM
-8

Really? What do they remove in normal cases of FGM?
/r/MensRights07/02/18 04:17 AM
-16

Not even by a long shot. Female circumcision removes a cluster of nerves essential for orgasm. Those nerves are not removed in male circumcision.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 03:30 AM
1

Everyone here is emotionally charged. I'm emotionally charged for different reasons though.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 12:35 PM
0

Don't diagnose me with having a problem until you understand that challenging someone isn't imposing a point of view on them.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 12:20 PM
0

Defensive? You mean disturbed and disgusted? Damn right I am.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 12:13 PM
0

What's imposing my point of view on others? Challenging them on their points of view? That's extreme SJW thinking right there my friend.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 11:59 AM
-2

I'm angry because I came to this issue with a genuinely open mind, and all I've encountered a bunch of narcissists snapping at anyone who dares question their weird interpretations of science and the motivations of others.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 12:55 PM
-4

Yeah, your former girlfriend wanted you to get circumcised because of social norms or some shit.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 04:41 AM
-2

Where the men circumcised?
/r/MensRights17/01/18 04:15 AM
-9

Are you serious? You just told everyone that you had a girlfriend who wanted you to undergo surgery because of the smell of your penis, and you're accusing me of having a smelly penis? No, I haven't been told my penis smells. I'm circumcised.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 04:14 AM
-9

Despite what they say in places like this, uncircumcised penises can smell really gross.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 03:36 AM
-4

What did she complain about most? The smell?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 08:06 PM
1

Is it the glands that secrete more oil? Or is it the folded skin adding more oil to the area. And from what I've heard, once a day washing isn't enough to keep the smell away.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 07:31 AM
1

Sebacious glands a small gland in the skin which secretes a lubricating oily matter (sebum) into the hair follicles to lubricate the skin and hair. So, skin oil? The stuff we wash away in the shower?
/r/MensRights15/01/18 05:18 AM
1

Do these specialised scent glands have a name?
/r/MensRights15/01/18 04:59 AM
36

A lot of misandry is a result of there being absolutely 0 consequences for engaging in it. She is providing a consequence. However small it is, it's a sign things are changing.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 10:01 PM
1

Do these specialised glands have a name? And female circumcision involves removing the clitoris. It's not accurate to portray male circumcision as the same thing.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 09:49 PM
1

What are these glands called? And you're very defensive.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 09:28 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smegma Is this what you're talking about? It says it's a combination of dead skin and skin oils.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 09:09 PM
1

And also provides mechanical function and lubrication during copulation to ensure smooth gliding and to eliminate friction. Where does this lubrication come from?
/r/MensRights14/01/18 12:49 PM
1

If every doctor was prosecuted for every mistake like this, there'd be no doctors.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 12:45 PM
2

Sex trafficking is a Feminist invention. Women who go into prostitution because of social and/or economic reasons are apparently forced into prostitution by men because men control society and the economy. So when prostutes get offers to make more money (men again) plying their trade in a western nation, feminist claim that "women are being forced into prostitution, then being trafficked into western nations!" (Whose societies and economies are also controlled by men). Idiot politicians, journal…
/r/MensRights12/01/18 04:39 AM
1

It's a mildy sexist joke based on a stereotype.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 04:03 AM
2

What is sex trafficking?
/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:52 AM
2

But you can have an unreasonable threshold for believing something. http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x23erz
/r/MensRights11/01/18 10:16 AM
2

So they had a standard for reasonable doubt. What is the problem? Because it suggests an impossibly high standard. You're supposed decide on the basis of "reasonable doubt". Before anyone says that the jury should just vote on whether the law was violated, but what if the statute is unjust or unreasonable? What if the standard of evidence is unreasonable? Wouldn't following that law blindly just create more injustice? You seem to be asking philosophical questions that I'm not capable of answerin…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:38 AM
6

I had vowed (to myself) going in that if they didn't have the rape recorded in Hi-Def, I could not in good conscience vote to convict.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:30 AM
-3

Yes it is ridicuolous. Your eye is lubricated by the tear ducts, whose secretion is coated over the eye with the assistance of the moving eyelid, keeping it moist and clean at the same time. The foreskin and eyelid have nothing in common with each other. Also, removing the teeth and removing the foreskin are far from close to being the same thing. Your teeth have an unambiguous purpose in the body's primary functions. Your foreskin on the other hand has at best hypothesised functions.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:27 AM
5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juror_misconduct Bias "An inclination of temperament or outlook; especially: a personal and sometimes unreasoned judgement"
/r/MensRights11/01/18 05:39 AM
-4

You should have recused yourself before the trial. You're as much a danger to society as a false accuser. I pray you're never in a position of power again.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:32 AM
5

Did they ask you whether or not you had any reasons to not be able to view the case in an unbiased fashion? You said yourself you had impossibly high standards for voting for a conviction. You lied to get on to a jury, and then let your biases influence the outcome of the trial.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:19 AM
10

Yeah, bringing your politics into the jury room is a pretty terrible thing to do. You can't blame false rape accusers for your actions either. They have their own rationale for doing bad shit, same as you.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:53 AM
-3

Doesn’t circumcision make the penis cleaner? The foreskin is largely analogous to the eyelid. Would your eyes be cleaner if your eyelids were cut off? This is a ridiculous anaolgy. I stopped reading after it.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:34 AM
3

Men are somewhat expendable in an evolutionary sense.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 03:57 AM
-2

And?
/r/MensRights09/01/18 03:37 AM
5

It's potentially a science.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 08:11 AM
2

6 months may be too long to be honest.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 03:30 AM
1

Including the ones that see opposition to child circumcision as an affront to their manhood and family? What? Well if you have a name that conveys pain and risk to infant then go ahead and use it. The name is just convenient short hand, not meant to appeal to every person's particular interest (an impossibility). People read a lot into names. "Intactivists" sounds like a bunch of guys who cry themselves to sleep over having some skin taken off their penises instead of being people who are concer…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 09:28 PM
-2

And a lot of men, an overwhelming majority in fact, don't feel anything is missing. I just mentioned in another post that I'm not really interested in how certain men feel about being circumcised, I'm interested in more objective concerns.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 08:45 PM
1

I mainly have problems with men who view circumcision through a lens of their own hypersensitivity. I'm not interested in whether someone feels "intact" or not, I'm more interested in other details, such as pain and risk to the infant.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 08:42 PM
1

I see the white horse you rode in on to save the damsel in distress I was the damsel in distress?
/r/MensRights16/12/17 08:21 PM
2

Well that's adding five syllables So? I get the feeling that you wouldn't 'take certain positions on male circumcision' seriously anyway What certain positions?
/r/MensRights16/12/17 08:18 PM
2

Anti-circumcision activists?
/r/MensRights16/12/17 06:33 PM
3

What frustrates me about the whole circumcision debate is that women think they have a say in whether or not babies do or do not get circumcised. To be fair, women have a perspective on male genitalia that men don't seem to share. I've overheard women say that uncircumsised penises are never as clean as circumcised penises. That could be affecting their decisions when deciding whether or not to get their male children circumcised.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 06:32 PM
1

A name that doesn't make me cringe and allows me to take people with certain positions on male circumcision seriously.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 06:27 PM
-1

Adopting the name is very close to picking the name.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 05:55 PM
0

intactivists How about you pick a less divisive and less cringe-worthy name for yourselves then? Most of us who are circumcised don't feel like half-men.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 04:51 PM
2

Impotent, ugly, emotional problems...
/r/MensRights16/12/17 05:10 AM
-3

Very relevant to this subreddit
/r/MensRights16/12/17 05:09 AM
3

We can't address certain problems because white people might benefit more so from addressing them than others might?
/r/MensRights16/12/17 03:03 AM
0

What kind of person watches Tucker Carlson? Howard Stern is less trashy than this shit.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 12:54 AM
-1

Why are you whispering?
/r/MensRights14/12/17 09:41 AM
-1

Don't think I've ever watched anything by Sowell. However, I've noticed that the people who quote him or post his videos usually aren't the brightest.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 06:32 AM
0

he wants to give Argentina back the Falklands against the expressed wishes of the people who LIVE on the Falklands What? All 20 of them?
/r/MensRights14/12/17 03:39 AM
1

Unfortunately, most of them will end up finding some form of work again. Where?
/r/MensRights11/12/17 07:48 AM
2

Dozens of big ones though.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 07:45 AM
1

Feminist content is still extremely profitable Don't a lot of feminist writers live on daddy's money?
/r/MensRights11/12/17 07:45 AM
1

https://www.ted.com/talks/christopher_mcdougall_are_we_born_to_run#t-355029 I was watching this a few years ago and got the impression that women were outperforming men in really long marathons. My mistake.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 12:35 AM
0

http://running.competitor.com/2015/01/news/study-women-better-marathon-pacers-men_121379 Men are better sprinters by far, but women might be better built for long spells of jogging.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 12:22 AM
-2

They don't need to be good reasons. And I hear that the jury is still out on circumcision and hygiene.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 06:34 AM
1

Hygiene? Tradition? Misguided ideas about male sexuality?
/r/MensRights08/12/17 05:18 AM
3

I'm not actually a big fan of lengthier sentences for female sex offenders. I'm more interested in simply using their lower sentences for exposing hypocrisy and double standards.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 01:30 AM
1

What has he said or done that makes you think he's an ally of yours? He attacked Buzzfeed because it attacked him. He doesn't give a shit that Buzzfeed attacked you.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 01:26 AM
12

She probably gets some kind of warped kick out of it Calm down. Those kinds of assumptions aren't healthy.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 11:47 PM
-9

Where I live, it used to be that only low-lives would not get their male children circumcised. It was a sign that you took an interest in the future cleanliness of your child's penis.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 11:40 PM
1

Once again, President Donald Trump is proven to be correct as MRAs support glorified used car salesmen now?
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:53 PM
2

Why did I get downvoted? Women are equal, if not better, than men in marathon running.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:35 AM
0

Marathon running
/r/MensRights06/12/17 05:36 AM
1

Treating students like one big androgynous group is an interesting idea.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 08:53 AM
1

I think you have issues mate.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 08:50 AM
1

To be honest, I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that underage sex trafficking is anything much more than a myth. Fucking kids is at the very least a social taboo pretty much everywhere in the world.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 02:03 AM
2

A quick look at your post history reveals that you're quite a progressive person. I like having my world-view challenged, but I have to wonder if someone such as yourself has a personal issue with a story that reveals feminists to be out of touch with reality. Edit: A closer look at the user's claim reveals it to be amiguous. Meaning, it can be either in support or against the claims made in the article.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 12:32 PM
1

Old
/r/MensRights05/08/17 10:42 PM
5

State sponsored birth control isn't a big thing for me. In fact, I'm suspicious of people who would get so worked up over it.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 01:41 AM
1

Is there any problem that you can't trace back to big government?
/r/MensRights18/07/17 02:47 AM
1

How? Aside from this case?
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:30 AM
6

The higher up SJWs have learned to hide their crazy. Be careful judging by looks.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:30 AM
2

A not clever post about a not clever movie.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:28 AM
3

Switch some words around, and you have a full-blown SJW here. And some people say Horse-shoe Theory is bunk.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:25 AM
1

Has this ended? Is it done?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:00 AM
9

What the fuck are you on about?
/r/MensRights14/07/17 07:31 AM
1

Someone sure got triggered.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 04:49 AM
1

I can't get past this guy's voice.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 09:58 AM
2

A female Doctor Who isn't a terrible idea.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 01:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter